DOCSLIB.ORG

Regionally Significant Surf Breaks in the Greater Wellington Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regionally Significant Surf Breaks in the Greater Wellington Region Regionally Significant Surf breaks in the Greater Wellington Region Prepared for: eCoast Marine Consulting and Research Po Box 151 Raglan New Zealand +64 7 825 0087 [email protected] GWRC Significant Surf Breaks Regionally Significant Surf breaks in the Greater Wellington Region Report Status Version Date Status Approved By: V 1 4 Dec ember 201 4 Final Draft STM V 2 5 February 2015 Rev 1 STM V 3 22 May 2015 Rev 2 EAA It is the responsibility of the reader to verify the currency of the version number of this report. Ed Atkin HND, MSc (Hons) Michael Gunson Shaw Mead BSc, MSc (Hons), PhD Cover page: Surfers entering the water at Lyall Bay, Wellington’s best known and most frequently surfed beach. Photo Michael Gunson The information, including the intellectual property, contained in this report is confidential and proprietary to eCoast Limited. It may be used by the persons to whom it is provided for the stated purpose for which it is provided, and must not be imparted to any third person without the prior written approval of eCoast. eCoast Limited reserves all legal rights and remedies in relation to any infringement of its rights in respect of its confidential information. © eCoast Limited 2015 GWRC Significant Surf Breaks Contents CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. IV GLOSSARY OF TERMS ..................................................................................................................................... VI 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 CHARACTERISATION OF REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT SURF BREAKS IN THE WELLINGTON REGION .................................... 12 2.2.1 Rationale ....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Identification – Mapping............................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Characterisation............................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 DETERMINATION OF SWELL CORRIDORS ........................................................................................................... 14 2.4 RISK ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................................... 19 3 WELLINGTON REGION SURF BREAK IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERISATION ................................... 21 3.1 SLIPPERIES ................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 CASTLEPOINT - MAIN BEACH ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 THE GAP .................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.4 CHRISTMAS BAY .......................................................................................................................................... 23 3.5 RIVERSDALE - MAIN BEACH ........................................................................................................................... 24 3.6 URUTI POINT .............................................................................................................................................. 24 3.7 STONY BAY ................................................................................................................................................ 25 3.8 TORA PIT ................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.9 TORA STREAM ............................................................................................................................................ 26 3.10 TORA TORA ........................................................................................................................................... 27 3.11 TOILET BOWLS ....................................................................................................................................... 28 3.12 SHIPWRECKS .......................................................................................................................................... 28 3.13 GOD SQUAD .......................................................................................................................................... 29 3.14 GNARLIES .............................................................................................................................................. 29 I GWRC Significant Surf Breaks 3.15 DOLPHIN BAY ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3.16 WHITE ROCK POINT ................................................................................................................................ 30 3.17 THE SPIT ............................................................................................................................................... 31 3.18 SECONDS .............................................................................................................................................. 32 3.19 THE DESERT .......................................................................................................................................... 32 3.20 SCHNAPPES ........................................................................................................................................... 33 3.21 WINDIES /N O.4 ...................................................................................................................................... 34 3.22 NING NONGS ......................................................................................................................................... 34 3.23 DEE DEES .............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.24 OTAKAHA STREAM .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.25 HUMENGA LODGE .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.26 PARARAKI STREAM .................................................................................................................................. 38 3.27 HUMENGA POINT ................................................................................................................................... 39 3.28 WHATARANGI POINT /B OMBIE .................................................................................................................. 39 3.29 WHATARANGI BAY BOMBIE ...................................................................................................................... 40 3.30 WHATARANGI STATION ........................................................................................................................... 41 3.31 BATCHES ............................................................................................................................................... 41 3.32 LAKE FERRY ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3.33 WAINUIOMATA RIVER ............................................................................................................................. 43 3.34 DRIBBLES .............................................................................................................................................. 43 3.35 ORONGORONGO RIVER ............................................................................................................................ 44 3.36 PIPES ................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.37 BUTTERFISH ROCK .................................................................................................................................. 45 3.38 PROPELLORS .......................................................................................................................................... 46 3.39 MOA POINT .......................................................................................................................................... 47 3.40 AIRPORT RIGHTS .................................................................................................................................... 47 3.41 LYALL BAY ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maori History of Ohariu1 and Maori Sites of Significance
    MAORI HISTORY OF OHARIU 1 AND MAORI SITES OF SIGNIFICANCE AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE 1. The West Coast of Wellington has a rich Maori history with significant changes over time and the greatest of these were during the early and mid-19th Century including the arrival of the New Zealand Company settlers and the Colonial Government. 2. From the sites of the earliest Maori of the Kahui Maunga or Kahui Tipua who roamed large areas to the forbears of Ngai Tara, Ngati Ira, Muaupoko and Rangitane generally referred to as Whatonga people to the Te Atiawa –Ngati Tama and Taranaki whanui who came with Ngati Toa in the early 19 Century. 3. With sea level rise and climate change events such as storm surges and the like some of the old coastal sites will be destroyed and burials for example exposed. Some will simply be covered by rising fresh or sea water. It is unlikely that there would be any strategy to try to preserve these sites on Wellington West Coast but instead recording these particularly where things are exposed that might not have previously been recorded. 4. It is important to be aware of the existing sites which might otherwise be occupied by communities wanting to retreat from climate change effects. 5. Te Atiawa-Taranaki Whanui and other Mana Whenua groups have broad kaitiaki roles, not just with the protection of Maori sites of significance, but also with the broader environment matters including in relation to flora and fauna and habitat. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Guidelines for Surfing Resources
    Management Guidelines for Surfing Resources Version History Version Date Comment Approved for release by Beta version release of Beta 1st October 2018 first edition for initial feedback period Ed Atkin Version 1 following V1 31st August 2019 feedback period Ed Atkin Please consider the environment before printing this document Management Guidelines for Surfing Resources This document was developed as part of the Ministry for Businesses, Innovation and Employment funded research project: Remote Sensing, Classification and Management Guidelines for Surf Breaks of National and Regional Significance. Disclaimer These guidelines have been prepared by researchers from University of Waikato, eCoast Marine Consulting and Research, and Hume Consulting Ltd, under the guidance of a steering committee comprising representation from: Auckland Council; Department of Conservation; Landcare Research; Lincoln University; Waikato Regional Council; Surfbreak Protection Society; and, Surf Life Saving New Zealand. This document has been peer reviewed by leading surf break management and preservation practitioners, and experts in coastal processes, planning and policy. Many thanks to Professor Andrew Short, Graeme Silver, Dr Greg Borne, Associate Professor Hamish Rennie, James Carley, Matt McNeil, Michael Gunson, Rick Liefting, Dr Shaun Awatere, Shane Orchard and Dr Tony Butt. The authors have used the best available information in preparing this document. Nevertheless, none of the organisations involved in its preparation accept any liability, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. While every effort has been made to ensure that these guidelines are clear and accurate, none of the aforementioned contributors and involved parties will be held responsible for any action arising out of its use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scarcity and Vulnerability of Surfing Resources
    Master‘s thesis The Scarcity and Vulnerability of Surfing Resources An Analysis of the Value of Surfing from a Social Economic Perspective in Matosinhos, Portugal Jonathan Eberlein Advisor: Dr. Andreas Kannen University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjör!ur, January 2011 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Andreas Kannen, Dr. External Reader: Ronald Wennersten, Prof., Dr. Program Director: Dagn! Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Jonathan Eberlein The Scarcity and Vulnerability of Surfing Resources – An Analysis of the Value of Surfing from a Social Economic Perspective in Matosinhos, Portugal 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Su"urgata 12, 400 Ísafjör"ur, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2011 Jonathan Eberlein All rights reserved Printing: Druck Center Uwe Mussack, Niebüll, Germany, January 2011 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. __________________________________________ Student‘s name Abstract The master thesis “The Scarcity and Vulnerability of Surfing Recourses - An Analysis of the Value of Surfing from a Social Economic Perspective in Matosinhos, Portugal” investigates the potential socioeconomic value of surfing and improvement of recreational ocean water for the City of Matosinhos. For that reason a beach survey was developed and carried out in order to find out about beach users activities, perceptions and demands. Results showed that user activities were dominated by sunbathing/relaxation on the beach and surfing and body boarding in the water.
    [Show full text]
  • NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2015-079 Report Date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WIA15301
    Technical Report 15 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA) – Coastal Processes Assessment Wellington International Airport Runway Extension Coastal Processes Assessment Prepared for Wellington International Airport Ltd March 2016 Prepared by: R.G. Bell For any information regarding this report please contact: Rob Bell Programme Leader: Hazards & Risk Coastal & Estuarine Processes +64-7-856 1742 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2015-079 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WIA15301 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Craig Stevens Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Andrew Laing Image of Wellington International Airport and Lyall Bay in southerly sea/swell on 20 July 2015. North is due left of image. [Source: DigitalGlobe/Google Earth] © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wainui Beach Management Strategy (WBMS)
    Wainui Beach Management Strategy (WBMS) - Surf break Protection Dr Amber Dunn Coastal Scientist, eco-i 21st June 2013 Introduction A management strategy is being devised for Wainui Beach to address coastal erosion. Work to date has identified the key community values to be encapsulated in this strategy are: • Protection of surf breaks of national significance, • Property Protection, • Maintain natural beach processes (and natural character), • Protect the foredune, and • Maintain public access to the beach The management strategy will address and examine these values. In this report, the focus is surf break protection and required answers to three key questions or queries: 1. An explanation of how surf breaks are formed and the related beach processes; 2. What are the high level design considerations or factors to consider to protect surf breaks when developing [protection] options? and 3. Are current protection works and dune care work impacting on surf break and to what extent? The community values indicate the management strategy will need to satisfy multiply needs, and therefore, should follow the key "good design" principle of 'solving more than one problem at a time'. In this respect, the community wants a management strategy that will satisfy these values: surf break protection and property protection and maintain natural beach processess (and therefore natural character) and protect the foredune and maintain public access. Therefore, a holistic approach was taken so that connections between these values are identified and explanations provided alongside answering the 3 key questions. This report is provided in two parts: (a) a brief summary - a single paragraph answer to the specified questions; and (b) an expanded explanation (or context) to support the brief summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind N Wave Surf Report
    Wind N Wave Surf Report Is Lothar folding or antigenic when err some petiolule blackmails seditiously? How frictionless is Morry when inquisitorial and real Webster superstructs some kennel? Cressy and multiseptate Kyle intimates her rampart outglare or point dubiously. Required functionality from depricated options_selection. They break either left or right, not both ways as do beach and reef breaks. The result will equal the depth the waves begin to feel the ocean floor. View high and low tides as well as predicted currents for thousands of locations in an easy to use graph and tabular format. We are a full service surf shop located on the central Oregon Coast. Shop Online Or Visit Our San Diego, CA. Their customer service is next to none. For beginner and ripper alike, the best wind direction is almost always light offshore switching to no wind at all. Swell Net offers daily observed surf reports for dawn patrol along with an afternoon update. Find out how to read a surf report with our complete guide. Listen to their perspectives, ask questions, and who knows! Get news and updates! Some surfers may prefer waves, which are steeper, faster and break quicker. When it comes to sculpting the perfect wave, wind strength and direction are as crucial as the tides. By working together we achieve more than by working alone. When the swell travel a long distance, the time between the waves increase. Anyone, anywhere can quickly and easily provide a report of conditions. Baker Beach Tide Times, CA Baker Beach Tides updated daily. Although difference in wind speed is one easy way to classify storms, hurricanes have other unusual characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Rivers and Lakes with Significant Amenity and Recreational Values Cover Page.Indd
    Selection of rivers and lakes with significant amenity and recreational values Selection of rivers and lakes with significant amenity and recreational values For more information, please contact: Greater Wellington March 2009 142 Wakefield Street GW/EP-G-09/28 PO Box 11646 Manners Street Wellington 6142 T 04 384 5708 F 04 385 6960 [email protected] www.gw.govt.nz/rps Contents 1. The need to identify rivers and lakes 1 2. The survey 2 3. The results of the survey 2 3.1 Responding organisations and their members 2 3.2 Aspects of the environment affecting its recreational and amenity values 3 3.3 What makes the recreational or amenity value significant? 4 3.4 Rivers lakes and wetlands identified 4 3.4.1 Lake Waitawa 4 3.4.2 Otaki River 5 3.4.3 Waikanae River 6 3.4.4 Whitby lakes 6 3.4.5 Horokiri Stream 7 3.4.6 Hutt River 7 3.4.7 Pakuratahi River 9 3.4.8 Akatarawa River 10 3.4.9 Wainuiomata River 10 3.4.10 Orongorongo River 11 3.4.11 Gollans Stream 12 3.4.12 Cameron Creek 12 3.4.13 Kohangapiripiri and Kohangatera lakes 13 3.4.14 Butterfly Creek 13 3.4.15 Korokoro Stream 14 3.4.16 Khandallah Stream 15 3.4.17 Karori Stream 15 3.4.18 Makara and Ohariu Streams 16 3.4.19 Ruamahanga River 16 3.4.20 Kourarau Dam 17 3.4.21 Henley Lake 18 3.4.22 Kopuaranga River 18 3.4.23 Waipoua River 19 3.4.24 Waingawa River 19 3.4.25 Waiohine River 20 3.4.26 Tauweru River 21 3.4.27 Tauherenikau River 21 3.4.28 Lake Wairarapa 22 Appendix 1: Rivers and lakes with significant or important amenity or recreation values in the Regional Policy Statement 1995 and the Regional Freshwater Plan 1999 23 Appendix 2: Survey of Recreational Users 24 Appendix 3: Respondents to the survey 30 Appendix 4: Factors making identified rivers and lakes suitable and unsuitable 31 Appendix 5: Rivers and lakes with significant amenity and recreational values listed in the proposed Regional Policy Statement, March 2009 33 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Applications Received 1 February 2021 – 13 February 2021
    Resource Consent applications received 1 February 2021 – 13 February 2021 You can sign up for a web alert at the bottom of Wellington.govt.nz to receive an email when this is updated. A Service Request (SR) number is the individual identification we give each Resource Consent application when lodged with Wellington City Council. If you contact us about any specific consent below, please quote this number. For More information on these consents please phone Customer Services on (04) 801 3590 or email Suburb Address Date SR No. Description Brooklyn 8 Monteith Grove 3/02/2021 483187 Land Use: New dwelling & associated earthworks Brooklyn 328 Hawkins Hill Road 11/02/2021 483759 Land Use: New dwelling on existing dwelling Churton Park 23 Lakewood Avenue 1/02/2021 482926 Boundary Activity: New deck Churton Park 14 Hattersley Grove 9/02/2021 483528 Land Use: earthworks Churton Park 15 Hattersley Grove 9/02/2021 483532 Land Use: New dwelling Hataitai 4 Rakau Road 9/02/2021 483529 Land Use: Additions and alterations to existing dwelling Hataitai 68 Kainui Road 11/02/2021 483753 Land Use: Additions and alterations Hataitai 45 Kainui Road 12/02/2021 483870 Land Use: New dwelling Hataitai 27 Alexandra Road 10/02/2021 483650 Change of Conditions: Relating to SR460047 Houghton Bay 13 Twomey Grove 9/02/2021 483536 Boundary Activity: New dwelling Houghton Bay 7 Ara Haewai 1/02/2021 482917 Land Use: New dwelling Island Bay 11 Erica Pabst Way 9/02/2021 483530 Change of Conditions: Relating to SR365583 Johnsonville 17 Meadowcroft Grove 9/02/2021 483589 Boundary
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast Fertility Rates (Births Per Woman)
    The number of births in Wellington City are derived by multiplying age specific fertility rates of women aged 15-49 by the female population in these age groups for all years during the forecast period. Birth rates are especially influential in determining the number of children in an area, with most inner urban areas having relatively low birth rates, compared to outer suburban or rural and regional areas. Birth rates have been changing, with a greater share of women bearing children at older ages or not at all, with overall increases in fertility rates. This can have a large impact on the future population profile. Forecast fertility rates (births per woman) Wellingto Year Chang n City e betwe en 2017 and 2043 Area 2017 2043 Number Wellingto 1.45 1.45 +0.01 n City Aro Valley 1.11 1.14 +0.04 - Highbury Berhampo 1.97 1.94 -0.03 re Brooklyn 1.52 1.49 -0.03 Churton Park - 1.95 1.94 -0.02 Glenside Grenada Village - Paparangi - 2.61 2.48 -0.14 Woodridg e - Horokiwi Hataitai 1.60 1.60 -0.01 Island Bay 1.59 1.57 -0.02 - Owhiro Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011. Compiled and presented in atlas.id by .id, the population experts. Bay Johnsonvil 1.94 1.89 -0.05 le Kaiwhara whara - Khandalla 1.61 1.58 -0.03 h - Broadmea dows Karori 1.73 1.74 +0.01 Kelburn 1.02 1.05 +0.02 Kilbirnie - Rongotai - 1.24 1.22 -0.02 Moa Point Kingston - Morningto 1.41 1.39 -0.01 n - Vogeltown Lyall Bay 2.32 2.28 -0.04 Miramar - 1.86 1.85 0 Maupuia Mt Cook 0.74 0.90 +0.16 Mt 0.75 0.78 +0.04 Victoria Newlands - 1.84 1.77 -0.07 Ngaurang a Newtown 1.53 1.50 -0.03 Ngaio - Crofton 2.13 2.10 -0.03 Downs Northland 1.22 1.21 -0.01 - Wilton Ohariu - Makara - 1.98 1.92 -0.05 Makara Beach Roseneath - Oriental 0.93 0.99 +0.06 Bay Seatoun - Karaka 1.59 1.59 0 Bays - Breaker Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Surf Breaks
    Appendix 4 Surf breaks Appendix 4 Surf breaks All provisions in this appendix are regional coastal plan [rcp]. ID Name Location Break Seabed Description Type Composition 1 Te Arai East Beach Sand Exposed beach break that is Beach Coast break frequently suitable for wave riding. (including Good wave quality suitable to all Pacific Road skill levels. Offers a 'wilderness' access point experience with lack of 'Black development. Good access. Swamp') 2 Pakiri Beach East Beach Sand Exposed beach break that is (North - Coast break frequently suitable for wave riding. 'Forestry') Good wave quality suitable to all skill levels. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with lack of development. Good access. 3 Pakiri Beach East Beach Sand Exposed beach break that is (South) Coast break frequently suitable for wave riding. Good wave quality suitable to all skill levels. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with lack of development. Good access. 4 Goat Island East Reef Rock/sand Semi exposed reef break. Coast break Relatively inconsistent. Good to high wave quality suitable to experienced surfers. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with little development. Good access. 5 Daniels Reef Leigh, Reef Rock Exposed reef break. Relatively East break consistent. High wave quality Coast suitable to experienced surfers. Good access. 6 Boulders Leigh, Reef Rock/sand Exposed variable reef breaks. East breaks Frequently surfable. Good to high Coast wave quality suitable to experienced surfers. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with a lack of development. Difficult access. Omaha East Beach Sand Semi exposed beach, bar and Beach and break, groyne breaks. Provides wave Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Appendix 4 Surf breaks Bar Coast bar quality suitable to learners break, relatively consistently.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Coast Surf Management Plan
    Gold Coast Surf Management Plan Our vision – Education, Science, Stewardship Cover and inside cover photo: Andrew Shield Contents Mayor’s foreword 2 Location specifi c surf conditions 32 Methodology 32 Gold Coast Surf Management Plan Southern point breaks – Snapper to Greenmount 33 executive summary 3 Kirra Point 34 Our context 4 Bilinga and Tugun 35 Gold Coast 2020 Vision 4 Currumbin 36 Ocean Beaches Strategy 2013–2023 5 Palm Beach 37 Burleigh Heads 38 Setting the scene – why does the Gold Coast Miami to Surfers Paradise including Nobby Beach, need a Surf Management Plan? 6 Mermaid Beach, Kurrawa and Broadbeach 39 Defi ning issues and fi nding solutions 6 Narrowneck 40 Issue of overcrowding and surf etiquette 8 The Spit 42 Our opportunity 10 South Stradbroke Island 44 Our vision 10 Management of our beaches 46 Our objectives 11 Beach nourishment 46 Objective outcomes 12 Seawall construction 46 Stakeholder consultation 16 Dune management 47 Basement sand excavation 47 Background 16 Tidal works approvals 47 Defi ning surf amenity 18 Annual dredging of Tallebudgera and Currumbin Creek Surf Management Plan Advisory Committee entrances (on-going) 47 defi nition of surf amenity 18 Existing coastal management City projects Defi nition of surf amenity from a scientifi c point of view 18 that consider surf amenity 48 Legislative framework of our coastline 20 The Northern Beaches Shoreline Project (on-going) 48 The Northern Gold Coast Beach Protection Strategy Our beaches – natural processes that form (NGCBPS) (1999-2000) 48 surf amenity on the Gold Coast
    [Show full text]
  • Makara Coast Where the Wild Things Are and Estuary
    Makara Coast Where the wild things are and Estuary Facilities Parking Swimming Four wheel driving Toilets Scuba diving Bird watching Pram accessible Fishing Cafe (in parts) Dog walking Boating (on leash*) Walking tracks Kayaking *On leash around estuary and off leash on beach. No dogs are allowed on the private farmland section of the walk during lambing season August - November. Highlight Follow the winding road, past the forest of wind turbines on an adventure to the sea. Walk the foreshore or explore one of the many tracks on the beautiful Makara coast. Description, values & signif icance Wild, windswept Makara on Wellington’s rugged west coast is an iconic site for people around the region. This estuary at the mouth of Makara Stream is one of the few remaining salt marsh areas in the region and provides important habitat for a range of native birds, fish and plant species that live in and visit the estuary. Take the Makara walkway to the historic gun emplacements along the top of the costal escarpment (steep hillside). Accessibility/How to get there/particular time of year to visit Makara Coast is located 25km from central Wellington, and is accessible by car or bike via Karori. Threatened species/species of interest The estuary hosts a range of shore birds including a large shag colony, the occasional royal spoonbill, white heron and the nationally vulnerable reef heron. The foreshore reserve contains some unique coastal plant community from specialised salt marsh vegetation to coastal scrub. The estuary is an important feeding and spawning ground, and nursery for fish such as mullet.
    [Show full text]