Columnea, Nematanthus, Drymonia, Glossoloma, and Crantzia, of Which the Latter Two Are Resurrected Generic Names to Accommodate Well-Supported Clades

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Columnea, Nematanthus, Drymonia, Glossoloma, and Crantzia, of Which the Latter Two Are Resurrected Generic Names to Accommodate Well-Supported Clades Selbyana 25(2): 182-209. 2005. A MONOGRAPH OF ALLOPLECTUS (GESNERIACEAE) JOHN L. CLARK Department of Botany, MRC-166, U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012; Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, 2023 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20052 USA. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Alloplectus (Gesneriaceae-Episcieae), whose range extends from Costa Rica to the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, comprises five species. The plants are obligate epiphytes with tubular non­ resupinate flowers. The generic circumscription of Alloplectus is based on phylogenetic analyses of mor­ phological and molecular data from the ribosomal (nrDNA) internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and the intergenic (tmH-psbA) chloroplast spacer region (details of the analyses are published separately). Alloplectus has a confusing taxonomic history with more than 150 names attributed to this poorly defined group that until recently had not been phylogenetic ally evaluated with material representing the generic type species, Alloplectus hispidus (Kunth) Mart. Many of the species traditionally recognized as Alloplectus are here transferred to Columnea, Nematanthus, Drymonia, Glossoloma, and Crantzia, of which the latter two are resurrected generic names to accommodate well-supported clades. Replacing the traditional poly­ phyletic concept of Alloplectus with a monophyletic Alloplectus presented here requires 29 new combi­ nations, two lectotypifications, and six neotypifications. A nomenclator of all excluded or uncertain species names attributed to Alloplectus is included with currently accepted names. Key words: Gesneriaceae, taxonomy, Alloplectus, Glossoloma, Crantzia, Columnea, Drymonia INTRODUCTION come a collection of species that lacked unifying synapomorphies. The genus Alloplectus Mart. has been a catch­ The taxonomic treatment here recognizes the all group for taxa that do not fit into other genera genus Alloplectus as a well-supported clade (bs in the tribe Episcieae. The traditionally recog­ = 100% in Clark et al. in press) united by the nized species of Alloplectus constitute a poly­ following unambiguous morphological synapo­ phyletic group of 40 species that requires the morphies: indistinguishable dry secondary leaf transfer of 29 names from Alloplectus into Ne­ venation, glabrous internal corolla surface, and matanthus (1 sp.) and Drymonia (4 spp.) and corollas constricted apically. Other characters of recognition of Glossoloma (21 spp.) and Crant­ Alloplectus that are useful in distinguishing it zia (3 spp.) for two well-supported clades. Thus, from Glossoloma are the subwoody perennial epiphytic habit, non-resupinate flowers, and pro­ the revised Alloplectus is here treated as a genus fusely branched stems. Characters that are help­ of five species. This paper provides a taxonomic ful for differentiating Alloplectus from other revision of Alloplectus based on recent phylo­ closely related genera of Episcieae are listed in genetic analyses of molecular and morphologi­ TABLE 1. cal data (Clark et al. in press). The five accepted species of Alloplectus range Most characters traditionally used to define from Costa Rica to Peru and are most abundant Alloplectus, such as a fleshy bivalved dehiscent in the northern Andes in Colombia. Many of the capsule, a pendent inflorescence of a reduced former species of Alloplectus, which form a pair-flowered cyme, and a haploid chromosome well-supported clade now recognized as the ge­ number of N = 9, are symplesiomorphic char­ nus Glossoloma, are easily differentiated in the acters shared with other genera such as Dry­ field by the presence of resupinate flowers. The monia and Paradrymonia. Other characters pre­ majority of species traditionally recognized in viously used to define Alloplectus, such as a tu­ Alloplectus will be treated in a revision of Glos­ bular or pouched corolla tube, are convergent soloma (Clark unpubl. data). with Nematanthus. To a certain extent, Alloplec­ tus was "defined" by what it lacked. For ex­ PHYLOGENY ample, species with poricidal anther dehiscence were treated as Drymonia, species with translu­ The neotropical Gesneriaceae comprise mem­ cent berries were treated as Corytoplectus, spe­ bers of two subfamilies, Gesnerioideae and part cies with non-translucent berries were treated as of Coronantheroideae (Burtt & Wiehler 1995). Columnea, and species with stolons were treated The subfamily Coronantheroideae contains nine as Alsobia or Episcia. Thus Alloplectus had be- genera and 20 species and extends from Chile 182 CLARK: ALLOPLECTUS MONOGRAPH 183 TABLE 1. Comparison of Alloplectus, Glossoloma, Coiumnea, Drymonia, and Crantzia, Characteristic Alloplectus Glossoloma Columnea Drymonia Crantzia Leaves Isophyllous Isophyllous Anisophy lIous Isophyllous Isophyllous (rarely isophyl- lous) Flower orienta- Non-resupinate Resupinate Non-resupinate Non-resupinate Resupinate or tion non-resupi- nate Habit Obligate epi- Terrestrial Facultative epi- Epiphytic or ter- Epiphytic or phyte (rarely epi- phyte or terres- restrial terrestrial phytic) trial Fruit Fleshy capsule Fleshy capsule Berry (rarely Fleshy capsule Fleshy capsule fleshy capsule) (rarely fleshy berry) Anther dehis- Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal Poricidal and Longitudinal cence longitutinal Corolla pouch Terminal when Terminal when Medial when Medial when Terminal when present present present present present to the South Pacific Islands and Australia (Wieh­ well supported (bs = 100% in Clark et al. in ler 1983), The Gesnerioideae contains five press) by both molecular and morphological tribes, 56 genera, and more than 1800 species data. The molecular data are from the ribosomal and represents nearly half the worldwide diver­ (nrDNA) internal transcribed spacer region sity of the plant family Gesneriaceae (Wiehler (ITS), a noncoding region between 18S and 26S 1983, Burtt & Wiehler 1995). The Episcieae is of the nrDNA and the intergenic spacer, trnH­ a member of the Gesnerioideae and ranks as the psbA of the cpDNA. Details of the ITS analysis most diverse tribe in the family with 22 genera are described by Clark and Zimmer (2003) and and an estimated 784 species, or roughly 21 % by Clark et al. (in press). of all Gesneriaceae. Episcieae is also the least The phylogenetic analysis (Clark et al. in studied, and generic concepts remain poorly de­ press) samples 21 of the 22 traditionally recog­ fined, partly because of a simplistic use of fruit nized genera with 155 species and 16 generic structure by earlier workers in delimiting genera. type species. To date, it is the most extensive A special need exists for more generic level phy­ taxon sampling within Episcieae. Although still logenetic analyses with greater sampling of spe­ greater taxon and character sampling is needed, cies diversity. the analysis is adequate to provide a framework Of the 22 genera in Episcieae, CoZumnea L. for the revision of AZZopZectus. The most recent is the only genus that has been consistently taxonomic treatment of AlZoplectus is well over shown to be monophyletic (with the inclusion 100 years old (Hanstein 1865). Hanstein's pub­ here of CoZumnea dielsii Mansf.) using morpho­ lication focused on the Gesneriaceae at the bo­ logical and molecular data (Smith 1994, Smith tanical garden in Berlin and provided an over­ & Sytsma 1994a, 1994b, 1994c). The lack of view of the family. Alloplectus was only a part monophyly for large genera (i.e., >20 spp.) in of Hanstein's (1865) entire monograph of the Episcieae has been suggested for Drymonia Gesneriaceae known at that time, but he recog­ Mart. (Smith 2000, Clark & Zimmer 2003), Epi­ nized 30 species of AZZopZectus in his treatment. scia Mart. (Smith et al. 1997), AlZoplectus Mart. More recent estimates range from 60 (Skog (Clark & Zimmer 2003), Paradrymonia Hanst. 1978 [1979]) to 75 species (Burtt & Wiehler (Smith & Carroll 1997, Smith 2000, Clark & 1995). Zimmer 2003), Codonanthe (Mart.) Hanst. Various sister taxa relationships for AlZoplec­ (Clark & Zimmer 2003), and Nematanthus tus have been proposed in the literature (Smith Schrad. (Clark & Zimmer 2003). NautiZocaZyx & Sytsma 1994a, 1994b, 1994c; Smith & Car­ Hanst. has 70-80 species (Burtt & Wiehler roll 1997; Smith 2000; Zimmer et al. 2002). 1995) and is one of the few large (i.e., >20 spp.) Only one publication, however, included the episcioid genera that has not been tested ade­ type species, AZZoplectus hispidus (Clark & Zim­ quately. mer 2003). Previous analyses were focused on The recognition of AZZopZectus is based on a resolving tribal-level phylogeny of the family total evidence analysis of two molecular datasets (FIGURE 1). The plastid markers such as ndhF, for 155 species and .a morphological matrix of trnL-F, and trnE-T used in previous analyses 120 species and 99 characters. AlZoplectus is were appropriate for addressing tribal level phy- 184 SELBYANA Volume 25(2) 2005 - =80-100% Bootstrap values only one previous analysis (Clark & Zimmer = 60-80% Bootstrap values 2003) included a species that represents the cur­ = <60% Bootstrap values rent clade-based concept of Allopleetus. Previ­ ous studies (FIGURE lA-E) can be summarized "..... Glossoloma I"'" Glossoloma r<]ColUmnta as follows. FIGURE lA. Drymonia and Glossoloma (as :, .. ~. <] ! .. ~ /I "Allopleetus") form a clade that is sister to Col­ .• :. , Drymonia Drymonia ~ :"""'-J Columnta .. ,L<] umnea. Sequence data from the chloroplast gene ndhF (Smith & Carroll 1997,
Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Flora De Galilea, Anexo B
    COMPOSICIÓN FLORISTICA, ESTRUCTURAL Y DIVERSIDAD DE LOS BOSQUES DE LA RESERVA FORESTAL GALILEA, TOLIMA (COLOMBIA) WILSON MARIO MALAGON R. Biólogo DIRECTOR HECTOR EDUARDO ESQUIVEL Lic. Biología M. Sc. LÍNEA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Cadenas Sostenibles Agroforestales Industriales. SUBLÍNEA Ecosistemas Forestales Naturales GRUPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Biodiversidad y Dinámica de Ecosistemas Tropicales UNIVERSIDAD DEL TOLIMA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS PROGRAMA DE MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS IBAGUÉ 2008 COMPOSICIÓN FLORISTICA, ESTRUCTURAL Y DIVERSIDAD DE LOS BOSQUES DE LA RESERVA FORESTAL GALILEA, TOLIMA (COLOMBIA) WILSON MARIO MALAGON RODRIGUEZ UNIVERSIDAD DEL TOLIMA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS IBAGUÉ 2008 COMPOSICIÓN FLORISTICA, ESTRUCTURAL Y DIVERSIDAD DE LOS BOSQUES DE LA RESERVA FORESTAL GALILEA, TOLIMA (COLOMBIA) WILSON MARIO MALAGÓN RODRÍGUEZ Trabajo de grado presentado como requisito parcial para optar al título de MAGISTER EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS Director: HECTOR EDUARDO ESQUIVEL M. Sc. En sistemática UNIVERSIDAD DEL TOLIMA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS IBAGUÉ 2008 3 ADVERTENCIA “La Facultad de Ciencias, El Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad del Tolima, el director del trabajo de grado, el jurado calificador, no son responsables de las ideas expuestas por el autor.” Art. 17de la Resolución No 015 de Dic. 18 de 1978 del Reglamento de Trabajos de Grado. 4 El autor WILSON MARIO MALAGÓN RODRÍGUEZ, autoriza a la Universidad del Tolima la reproducción total o parcial de este documento, con la debida cita de reconocimiento de la autoría y cede a la misma universidad de los derechos patrimoniales con fines de investigación, docencia e institucionales, consagrados en el articulo 72 de la Ley 23 de 1982 y las normas que lo constituyan o modifiquen.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Hybrid Origin in Columnea (Gesneriaceae) ⇑ James F
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 106 (2017) 228–240 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Resolving incongruence: Species of hybrid origin in Columnea (Gesneriaceae) ⇑ James F. Smith a, , John L. Clark b,c, Marisol Amaya-Márquez d, Oscar H. Marín-Gómez d,e a Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725-1515, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Box 870345, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA c The Lawrenceville School: Science Department, The Lawrenceville School, 2500 Main Street, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA d Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, Colombia e Posgrado en Ciencias, Instituto de Ecología, INECOL A.C, Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico article info abstract Article history: Speciation by hybridization has long been recognized among plants and includes both homoploid and Received 12 August 2016 allopolyploid speciation. The numbers of presumed hybrid species averages close to 11% and tends to Revised 30 September 2016 be concentrated in a subset of angiosperm families. Recent advances in molecular methods have verified Accepted 3 October 2016 species of hybrid origin that had been presumed on the basis of morphology and have identified species Available online 5 October 2016 that were not initially considered hybrids. Identifying species of hybrid origin is often a challenge and typically based on intermediate morphology, or discrepancies between molecular datasets. Keywords: Discrepancies between data partitions may result from several factors including poor support, incom- Hybrid species plete lineage sorting, or hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGÍA DE LA POLINIZACIÓN Y MECANISMOS DE COEXISTENCIA DEL ENSAMBLE DE Columnea (GESNERIACEAE) EN LA RESERVA NATURAL ÑAMBÍ, NARIÑO- COLOMBIA
    1 ECOLOGÍA DE LA POLINIZACIÓN Y MECANISMOS DE COEXISTENCIA DEL ENSAMBLE DE Columnea (GESNERIACEAE) EN LA RESERVA NATURAL ÑAMBÍ, NARIÑO- COLOMBIA. OSCAR HUMBERTO MARÍN GÓMEZ UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA SEDE BOGOTÁ FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS Bogotá D.C., COLOMBIA 2014 2 ECOLOGÍA DE LA POLINIZACIÓN Y MECANISMOS DE COEXISTENCIA DEL ENSAMBLE DE Columnea (GESNERIACEAE) EN LA RESERVA NATURAL ÑAMBÍ, NARIÑO- COLOMBIA. OSCAR HUMBERTO MARÍN GÓMEZ Tesis o trabajo de investigación presentada(o) como requisito parcial para optar al título de Magister en Ciencias Biológicas Director (a): Ph.D., MARISOL AMAYA-MARQUEZ UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA SEDE BOGOTÁ FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS Bogotá D.C., COLOMBIA 2014 3 AGRADECIMIENTOS Esta investigación fue realizada gracias al apoyo financiero recibido de la beca Nellie D. Sleeth Scholarship, otorgada por The Gesneriad Society INC, y del programa de incentivos para la investigación Thomas van der Hammen (Jardín Botánico José Celestino Mutis). Un especial agradecimiento a la profesora Marisol Amaya Márquez por sus enseñanzas, su dedicación y apoyo constante en todas las fases de este trabajo y por permitir mi participación en sus investigaciones sobre biodiversidad y ecología de gesneriáceas. Al profesor Gary Stiles por sus enseñanzas y sus sugerencias en todas las fases del trabajo. Al profesor Juan Francisco Ornelas por sus aportes puntuales y evaluación del trabajo. A James Smith, John Clark y Laura Clavijo por sus discusiones sobre las gesneriáceas. A la Fundación Ecológica Los Colibríes de Altaquer, y en especial a Mauricio Flórez Pai por facilitar las condiciones para la investigación en la Reserva Natural Río Ñambí. A Diana, Jairo, Hugo y Guillermo “El Zambo” por su gran colaboración en la logística de la fase de campo y su hospitalidad durante mi estancia en la reserva.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranunculales Dumortier (1829) Menispermaceae A
    Peripheral Eudicots 122 Eudicots - Eudicotyledon (Zweikeimblättrige) Peripheral Eudicots - Periphere Eudicotyledonen Order: Ranunculales Dumortier (1829) Menispermaceae A. Jussieu, Gen. Pl. 284. 1789; nom. cons. Key to the genera: 1a. Main basal veins and their outer branches leading directly to margin ………..2 1b. Main basal vein and their outer branches are not leading to margin .……….. 3 2a. Sepals 6 in 2 whorls ……………………………………… Tinospora 2b. Sepals 8–12 in 3 or 4 whorls ................................................. Pericampylus 3a. Flowers and fruits in pedunculate umbel-like cymes or discoid heads, these often in compound umbels, sometimes forming a terminal thyrse …...................… Stephania 3b. Flowers and fruits in a simple cymes, these flat-topped or in elongated thyrses, sometimes racemelike ………………………........................................... Cissampelos CISSAMPELOS Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 1031. 1753. Cissampelos pareira Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1031. 1753; H. Kanai in Hara, Fl. E. Himal. 1: 94. 1966; Grierson in Grierson et Long, Fl. Bhut. 1(2): 336. 1984; Prain, Beng. Pl. 1: 208. 1903.Cissampelos argentea Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. 5: 67. 1821. Cissampelos pareira Linnaeus var. hirsuta (Buchanan– Hamilton ex de Candolle) Forman, Kew Bull. 22: 356. 1968. Woody vines. Branches slender, striate, usually densely pubescent. Petioles shorter than lamina; leaf blade cordate-rotunded to rotunded, 2 – 7 cm long and wide, papery, abaxially densely pubescent, adaxially sparsely pubescent, base often cordate, sometimes subtruncate, rarely slightly rounded, apex often emarginate, with a mucronate acumen, palmately 5 – 7 veined. Male inflorescences axillary, solitary or few fascicled, corymbose cymes, pubescent. Female inflorescences thyrsoid, narrow, up to 18 cm, usually less than 10 cm; bracts foliaceous and suborbicular, overlapping along rachis, densely pubescent.
    [Show full text]
  • 158347229.Pdf
    Vol. 30(1): 190–256 (2020) 190 Index to names of New World Gesneriaceae ISSN: 0971-2313 (Print edition) RHEEDEA ISSN: 2582-2438 (Online edition) Journal of the Indian Association for Angiosperm Taxonomy https://dx.doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2020.30.01.14 Index to names of New World members of the Gesneriaceae (subfamilies Sanangoideae and Gesnerioideae) Clark J.L.1,2,3,*, Skog L.E.2, Boggan J.K.2 & S. Ginzbarg3 1 Science Department, Lawrenceville School, Lawrenceville, New Jersey – 08648, USA. 2 National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC – 20013, USA. 3Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama – 35487, USA. **E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: A comprehensive taxonomic list of New members of the subfamilies Sanangoideae (one World Gesneriaceae is provided for all currently known genus and one species) and Gesnerioideae (five accepted names and their synonyms. The list presented tribes, c. 77 genera, 1200+ species) plus Titano- here corresponds to the subfamilies Sanangoideae and trichum (one species). More than 4000 names were Gesnerioideae plus the Old World genus Titanotrichum collected from specimens, scientific literature, and and includes 1217 accepted names and 2332 synonyms. horticultural literature. Earlier versions of these data Generic concepts and classification of New World were maintained in dBase during the 1980s and Gesneriaceae have changed with the recent surge in 1990s with an emphasis on New World molecular-based phylogenies, and that has made it challenging to determine the accepted names in Gesneriaceae. In the late 1990s, the data were historical literature and outdated names that persist in transferred to Microsoft Access and expanded to databases such as GenBank.
    [Show full text]
  • Componente Biòtico
    CARACTERIZACIÓN FISICA, BIOLÓGICA, SOCIOECONÓMICA Y CULTURAL DE LA CUENCA ALTA DEL RÍO DAGUA. TOMO III Componente Biòtico CARACTERIZACIÓN FISICA, BIOLÓGICA, SOCIOECONÓMICA Y CULTURAL DE LA CUENCA ALTA DEL RÍO DAGUA. TOMO III Componente Biótico Flora, Aves, Mamiferos, Reptiles y Anfibios Consejo Comunitario del Alto y Medio Dagua. con el apoyo de la Fundación Social Agroambiental Pacifico Vivo “Fundapav”. CARACTERIZACIÓN FÍSICA, BIOLÓGICA, SOCIOECONÓMICA Y CULTURAL DE LA CUENCA ALTA DEL RÍO DAGUA. Consejo Comunitario de la Comunidad Negra de la Parte Alta y Media de la Cuenca del Rio Dagua Fundación Social Agroambiental Pacífico Vivo – FUNDAPAV ISBN: 978-958-57728-0-9 Buenaventura. 2012 Consejo Comunitario Consejo Comunitario de la Comunidad Negra de la Parte Alta y Media de la Cuenca del Rio Dagua Representante Legal Manuel Riascos Representante Legal Manuel Riascos Rodríguez Coord. General José E. Murillo Comité Editorial Oscar O. Hernández Noviteño Secretaria General Karen Brown Nancy Sanmiguel Toro Pablo Andrés Ramos Tesorero Pedro Isabel Riascos Compiladora Tania Micolta Caicedo Fiscal Herculano Valencia Textos Conciliadora Nancy Sanmiguel Toro, Tatiana Palacios Hurtado, Mariela Angulo Sirley Vásquez Choco, Santiago Sierra, Andrés Giraldo, Alex Cortes, Andrea Borrero, Oscar E. Murillo García, Coord. De Salud Evelia Moreno María Juliana Bedoya Durán, Andrea Cáceres, Rubilda Herman Riascos, Yadira López Áchito, Jesús David Coord. Comunicaciones Viáfara Banguera, Miguel Enrique Álvarez Álvarez, Jeison Vargas Gian Carlo Sánchez Garcés, Luis Carlos Pardo L. Coord.: De Infraestructura Arley Martínez Corrección de estilo Tania Micolta Caicedo Coord.: Genero, Adulto Mayor Y Juventud Diseño Melida Perea Diego Joel Angulo Portocarrero Impresión Coord. Medio Ambiente Ferney López Entorno Digital Publicado por: Coord.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 54: 1-180
    ^ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION «K Contributions of the United States National Herbarium c7U Volume 54: 1-180 Floristic Checklist of the Mache-Chindul Mountains of Northwestern Ecuador by John L. Clark David A. Neill and Mercedes Asanza Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2006 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 54: 1-180 Floristic Checklist of the Mache-Chindul Mountains of Northwestern Ecuador by John L. Clark, David A. Neill and Mercedes Asanza Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2006 ) ABSTRACT Clark, John L., David A. Neill, and Mercedes Asanza. Floristic Checklist of the Mache-Chindul Moun- tains of Northwestern Ecuador. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 54, 1 80 pages (including 23 figures). An inventory of the vascular plants of the Mache-Chindul Mountains is presented from collecting expeditions beginning in 1991 to present. The Mache-Chindul Mountains reach an elevation of 800 meters and are located in northwestern Ecuador in the southernmost part of the province of Esmeraldas (00°21'N 79°44'W) and the northern- most part of the province of Manabi (00°25'S 79°57'W). The Pacific Ocean lies 20-30 km due west and the equator transects the 2 middle of this mountain range. The Mache-Chindul range occupies about 400 km and harbors the last large tract of coastal wet forest in Ecuador, an area less than 4% of its original size. Important protected areas include the Reserva Ecologica Mache- Chindul, Bilsa Biological Station, Bosque Protector Cerro Pata de Pajaro, and the Reserva Lalo Loor.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Forest Remnants in the Cordillera De La Costa and Adjacent
    Rapid Assessment Program RAP Working Papers 2 Status of Forest Remnants in the Cordillera de la Costa and Adjacent Areas of Southwestern Ecuador CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 1992 Conservation Priorities: The Role of RAP Our planet faces many serious environmental problems, among them global climate change, pollution, soil erosion, and toxic waste disposal. At Conservation International (CI), we believe that there is one problem that surpasses all others in terms of importance because of its irreversibility, the extinction of biological diversity. Conservation efforts still receive only a tiny fraction of the resources, both human and financial, needed to get the job done. As a result of this, we must use available resources efficiently, applying them to those places with the highest concentrations of diversity which are at most immediate risk of disappearing. CI uses a strategic, hierarchical approach for setting conservation investment priorities. At a global level, we have targeted the “hotspots,” 15 tropical areas that hold a third or more of all terrestrial diversity and are at great risk. Our global priorities also focus on major tropical wilderness areas and the “megadiversity” country concept, which highlights the importance of the national entities that harbor high biodiversity. We are now undertaking a series of priority-setting exercises for other major categories of ecosystems, among them marine systems, deserts, and dry forests. The next level of priority setting is the bio-regional workshop, a process where experts assemble their combined knowledge of an area to map regional conservation priorities using CI’s geographic information system (CISIG). We have also taken a taxon-based approach, working with the Species Survival Commission of IUCN to produce action plans for key groups of organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Etymology of Succulent Genera by Carolus Linnaeus
    ETYMOLOGY OF SUCCULENT GENERA BY CAROLUS LINNAEUS Chuck Staples, MICSS Historian, January 2017 Although I have no training in Latin, Greek, botany or taxonomy, for purposes of this article, I will attempt to give you the Etymology (the study of origin of words) of the succulent genera that Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778) [Carl von Linné upon his ennoblement be the Swedish King in 1762] described. In some situations the genera is named in honor of an individual—if not, the word will normally come from Latin or Greek origin. It's amazing the number of succulent genera Linnaeus described in the 18th Century that are still current today. All succulent genera (with exception of Cactus genus) information below comes from the six 2001–2003 Illustrated Handbooks of Succulent Plants by editors Urs Eggli and Heidrun E.K. Hartmann and the Internet. Dicots = two embryonic leaves and are the first leaves to appear from germinating seeds. Monocots = one embryonic leaf and is the first leaf to appear from germinating seeds. {Dicots and monocots are two groups into which all flowering plants were divided.} Eudicots = same characteristics as dicots with main difference in structure of pollen — a modern definition of dicots. Adansonia 1759 (dicots in family Bombacaceae): Named after Michel Adanson (1727–1806), a French botanist, systematist, naturalist, taxonomist & biologist who discovered the Baobab (Adansonia digitata) in Senegal 1749; 9 succulent species native to Madagascar, mainland Africa, Arabian Peninsula and Australia. Agave 1753 (monocots in family Agavaceae): Greek 'Agave', daughter of Kadmos and sister of Semele in Greek mythology; also Greek 'agavos', stately, noble, illustrious, for the stately nature of many species, but also for the ferocious leaf margin teeth present in many species; a large number of succulent species chiefly in Mexico, also USA, central and tropical South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Plant Hummingbird Interactions in Mashpi, Ecuador
    ECOLOGY OF PLANT HUMMINGBIRD INTERACTIONS IN MASHPI, ECUADOR Tatiana Santander, Esteban Guevara, Francisco Tobar, Holger Beck, Nicole Büttner, Andrea Nieto, Andrés Marcayata, Friederike Richter, María José Gavilanes, Cristian Poveda, Bryan Rojas, Rafael Wüest, Carolina Bello and Catherine H. Graham October 27, 2020 Contents 1. Introduction and project overview 1 2. Methodological Approach 2 Field transects ................................ 2 Time­lapse cameras .............................. 5 3. Resulting patterns 5 Plant­hummingbird interactions ........................ 5 Plants information and phenology ....................... 10 The Network of Interactions .......................... 14 4. Conclusions: 23 Acknowledgements 24 1. Introduction and project overview One of the main hypotheses for how so many related species can co­occur is resource ­partitioning where species use different resources, which limits competition among species and allows them to co­exist. In the case of hummingbirds and plants, each hummingbird species forages on a distinct set of flowers and each flowering plant species is visited by a subset of hummingbirds. Interactions between plants and hummingbirds are mutually beneficial. These mutualistic hummingbird­plant interactions are important from a hummingbird perspective because hummingbirds require nectar to fuel their high­energy lifestyles where they often hover – an energetically costly behavior – to take nectar. From a plant perspective most hummingbirds pollinate flowers as they forage on nectar, though some hummingbirds take nectar from the base of the flower, cheating the flower from this service of pollination. The intricate web of interactions between hummingbirds and their food plants evolved over millennia as a result of diffuse co­evolution which yielded a remarkable array of morphological forms and functions. On­going human activities, such as deforestation and climate change threaten these interaction webs, yet little is known as to how hummingbirds and their food plants will respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Plant Origin Influence the Fitness Impact of Flower Damage? a Meta-Analysis
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Does Plant Origin Influence the Fitness Impact of Flower Damage? A Meta-Analysis Catalina González-Browne1, Maureen M. Murúa1, Luis Navarro2, Rodrigo Medel1* 1 Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile, 2 Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, 36200, Vigo, Spain * [email protected] Abstract Herbivory has been long considered an important component of plant-animal interactions that influences the success of invasive species in novel habitats. One of the most important hypotheses linking herbivory and invasion processes is the enemy-release hypothesis, in which exotic plants are hypothesized to suffer less herbivory and fitness-costs in their novel ranges as they leave behind their enemies in the original range. Most evidence, however, OPEN ACCESS comes from studies on leaf herbivory, and the importance of flower herbivory for the inva- Citation: González-Browne C, Murúa MM, Navarro sion process remains largely unknown. Here we present the results of a meta-analysis of L, Medel R (2016) Does Plant Origin Influence the the impact of flower herbivory on plant reproductive success, using as moderators the type Fitness Impact of Flower Damage? A Meta-Analysis. of damage caused by floral herbivores and the residence status of the plant species. We PLoS ONE 11(1): e0146437. doi:10.1371/journal. found 51 papers that fulfilled our criteria. We also included 60 records from unpublished pone.0146437 data of the laboratory, gathering a total of 143 case studies. The effects of florivory and nec- Editor: Harald Auge, Helmholtz Centre for tar robbing were both negative on plant fitness.
    [Show full text]