DOCSLIB.ORG

Parlement Européen 2014-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parlement Européen 2014-2019 Parlement européen 2014-2019 Commission de l’environnement, de la santé publique et de la sécurité alimentaire ENVI_PV(2019)0129 PROCÈS-VERBAL Réunion du 29 janvier 2019, de 15 heures à 18 h 30 BRUXELLES La séance est ouverte le mardi 29 janvier 2019 à 15 h 10 sous la présidence d’Adina‑Ioana Vălean, présidente. 1. Adoption de l’ordre du jour ENVI_OJ(2019)0129_1 L’ordre du jour est adopté tel qu’il ressort du présent procès-verbal. 2. Communications de la présidence La présidente communique les informations suivantes: Annulation de la réunion: la présidente indique que la réunion de l’après- midi du jeudi 21 février, prévue «en réserve», est annulée et confirme que les réunions du mercredi 20 février et du matin du jeudi 21 février auront lieu comme prévu. Le projet d’ordre du jour de la réunion sera distribué en temps utile. Modifications au sein du secrétariat de la commission ENVI: la présidente annonce qu’Emilia Romano quittera le secrétariat de la commission ENVI le 1er février. Interprétation: correspond au profil linguistique type de la commission; elle est assurée dans 21 langues, à l’exception de l’estonien, du letton et de l’irlandais. Dossier de réunion au format électronique / Retransmission en ligne: la présidente indique que, comme à l’accoutumée, le dossier de la réunion est disponible au format électronique dans l’application e‑Meeting et que la réunion est retransmise en ligne. PV\1176352FR.docx PE634.742v01-00 FR Unie dans la diversité FR 3. Communications de la présidence sur les recommandations des coordinateurs du 21 janvier 2019 La présidente indique aux membres de la commission que les recommandations des coordinateurs du 21 janvier 2019 ont été transmises par voie électronique. Aucune objection n’ayant été soulevée, ces recommandations sont réputées approuvées (cf. annexe II). 4. Compte rendu des négociations interinstitutionnelles en cours Conformément à l’article 69 septies du règlement intérieur du Parlement européen, la présidente fait rapport à la commission sur les résultats des trilogues sur les dossiers suivants: * Normes de performance en matière d’émissions de CO2 pour les véhicules utilitaires lourds neufs * Transparence et durabilité de l’évaluation du risque au niveau de l’UE dans la chaîne alimentaire * Véhicules propres * * * *** Heure des votes (vote électronique) *** 5. Proposition de règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil modifiant les règlements (UE) nº 1308/2013 portant organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur des produits agricoles, (UE) nº 1151/2012 relatif aux systèmes de qualité applicables aux produits agricoles et aux denrées alimentaires, (UE) nº 251/2014 concernant la définition, la description, la présentation, l’étiquetage et la protection des indications géographiques des produits vinicoles aromatisés, (UE) nº 228/2013 portant mesures spécifiques dans le domaine de l’agriculture en faveur des régions ultrapériphériques de l’Union et (UE) nº 229/2013 portant mesures spécifiques dans le domaine de l’agriculture en faveur des îles mineures de la mer Égée ENVI/8/13532 ***I 2018/0218(COD) COM(2018)0394 – C8-0246/2018 Rapporteur pour avis: Herbert Dorfmann (PPE) PA – PE630.373v01-00 AM – PE631.855v03-00 Fond: AGRI – Eric Andrieu (S&D) PR – PE623.922v01-00 AM – PE632.001v01-00 AM – PE632.002v01-00 AM – PE631.782v01-00 Adoption du projet d’avis Décision: le projet d’avis, tel que modifié, est adopté par 44 voix pour, 7 contre et 4 abstentions. PE634.742v01-00 2/25 PV\1176352FR.docx FR 6. Semestre européen pour la coordination des politiques économiques: Examen annuel de la croissance 2019 ENVI/8/13122 2018/2119(INI) Rapporteur pour avis: Andrey Kovatchev (PPE) PA – PE631.843v01-00 AM – PE632.853v01-00 Fond: ECON* – Tom Vandenkendelaere (PPE) PR – PE630.674v01-00 Adoption du projet d’avis Décision: le projet d’avis, tel que modifié, est adopté par 43 voix pour, 8 contre et 2 abstentions. *** Fin des votes (vote électronique) *** * * * 7. Audition publique sur la «Stratégie pour la réduction à long terme des émissions de gaz à effet de serre de l’Union européenne, conformément à l’accord de Paris» ENVI/8/15392 Interviennent: Miguel Arias Cañete (commissaire européen chargé de l’action pour le climat et de l’énergie)), Michal Kurtyka (Président de la COP24 et secrétaire d’État au ministère polonais de l’environnement), Marco Mensink (membre d’A.SPIRE (industries de transformation innovantes) et directeur général du Conseil européen de l’industrie chimique (CEFIC), Benjamin Denis (conseiller chargé de l’énergie et du climat à la Confédération européenne des syndicats (CES)), Jérôme Meessen (ClimAct), Rachel Ward (responsable des politiques, Groupe d’investisseurs institutionnels sur le changement climatique (IIGCC)), Claire Roumet (Energy Cities/Conventions des maires de l’Union européenne), Peter Liese, José Blanco López, Jo Leinen, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Michèle Rivasi, Miriam Dalli, Bas Eickhout, Jytte Guteland, Tilly Metz, Seb Dance, Tiemo Wölken, Paul Brannen, Miriam Dalli et Mauro Petriccione (directeur général de la DG CLIMA) Pilar Ayuso (doyenne d’âge) assume la présidence à partir de 17 h 15. * * * PV\1176352FR.docx 3/25 PE634.742v01-00 FR 8. Stratégie pour la réduction à long terme des émissions de gaz à effet de serre de l’Union européenne, conformément à l’accord de Paris ENVI/8/15158 2018/2974(RSP) Corapporteurs: Peter Liese (PPE) RE – PE632.778v01-00 Jytte Guteland (S&D) QO – PE632.780v01-00 Nils Torvalds (ALDE) QO – PE632.779v01-00 Lynn Boylan (GUE/NGL) Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE) Eleonora Evi (EFDD) Fond: ENVI Examen de la proposition de résolution Interviennent: Peter Liese, Jytte Guteland, Bas Eickhout et Eleonora Evi Décision: Délai de dépôt des amendements: 31 janvier 2019, à 17 heures Vote en commission ENVI: 20 février 2019 Vote en plénière: Mars I ou II 9. Questions diverses Néant. 10. Prochaines réunions 7 février 2019 – réunion conjointe des commissions ENVI et DEVE (article 55 du règlement intérieur) (Bruxelles) 20 et 21 février 2019 (Bruxelles) * * * La séance est levée à 18 h 25. PE634.742v01-00 4/25 PV\1176352FR.docx FR ПРИСЪСТВЕН ЛИСТ/LISTA DE ASISTENCIA/PREZENČNÍ LISTINA/DELTAGERLISTE/ ANWESENHEITSLISTE/KOHALOLIJATE NIMEKIRI/ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΩΝ/RECORD OF ATTENDANCE/ LISTE DE PRÉSENCE/POPIS NAZOČNIH/ELENCO DI PRESENZA/APMEKLĒJUMU REĢISTRS/DALYVIŲ SĄRAŠAS/ JELENLÉTI ÍV/REĠISTRU TA' ATTENDENZA/PRESENTIELIJST/LISTA OBECNOŚCI/LISTA DE PRESENÇAS/ LISTĂ DE PREZENŢĂ/PREZENČNÁ LISTINA/SEZNAM NAVZOČIH/LÄSNÄOLOLISTA/DELTAGARLISTA Бюро/Mesa/Předsednictvo/Formandskabet/Vorstand/Juhatus/Προεδρείο/Bureau/Predsjedništvo/Ufficio di presidenza/Prezidijs/ Biuras/Elnökség/Prezydium/Birou/Predsedníctvo/Predsedstvo/Puheenjohtajisto/Presidiet (*) Adina-Ioana Vălean (P), Benedek Jávor (1st VP), Pavel Poc (3rd VP) Членове/Diputados/Poslanci/Medlemmer/Mitglieder/Parlamendiliikmed/Μέλη/Members/Députés/Zastupnici/Deputati/Deputāti/Nariai/ Képviselõk/Membri/Leden/Posłowie/Deputados/Deputaţi/Jäsenet/Ledamöter Marco Affronte, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Zoltán Balczó, Catherine Bearder, Ivo Belet, Biljana Borzan, Paul Brannen, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Nessa Childers, Birgit Collin-Langen, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Mark Demesmaeker, Bas Eickhout, José Inácio Faria, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Jens Gieseke, Julie Girling, Sylvie Goddyn, Françoise Grossetête, Andrzej Grzyb, Jytte Guteland, Jean-François Jalkh, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Karin Kadenbach, Urszula Krupa, Giovanni La Via, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Valentinas Mazuronis, Susanne Melior, Miroslav Mikolášik, Rory Palmer, Massimo Paolucci, Bolesław G. Piecha, John Procter, Julia Reid, Michèle Rivasi, Davor Škrlec, Renate Sommer, Ivica Tolić, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Damiano Zoffoli Заместници/Suplentes/Náhradníci/Stedfortrædere/Stellvertreter/Asendusliikmed/Αναπληρωτές/Substitutes/Suppléants/Zamjenici/ Supplenti/Aizstājēji/Pavaduojantysnariai/Póttagok/Sostituti/Plaatsvervangers/Zastępcy/Membros suplentes/Supleanţi/Náhradníci/ Namestniki/Varajäsenet/Suppleanter Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Herbert Dorfmann, Eleonora Evi, Fredrick Federley, Eleonora Forenza, Christophe Hansen, Tilly Metz, Dubravka Šuica, Babette Winter, Tiemo Wölken, Carlos Zorrinho 200 (2) José Blanco López, Andor Deli 206 (3) 53 (8) (Точка от дневния ред/Punto del orden del día/Bod pořadu jednání (OJ)/Punkt på dagsordenen/Tagesordnungspunkt/ Päevakorra punkt/Ημερήσια Διάταξη Σημείο/Agenda item/Point OJ/Točka dnevnog reda/Punto all'ordine del giorno/Darba kārtības punkts/Darbotvarkės punktas/Napirendi pont/Punt Aġenda/Agendapunt/Punkt porządku dziennego/Ponto OD/Punct de pe ordinea de zi/Bod programu schôdze/Točka UL/Esityslistan kohta/Föredragningslista punkt) PV\1176352FR.docx 5/25 PE634.742v01-00 FR Наблюдатели/Observadores/Pozorovatelé/Observatører/Beobachter/Vaatlejad/Παρατηρητές/Observers/Observateurs/Promatrači/ Osservatori/Novērotāji/Stebėtojai/Megfigyelők/Osservaturi/Waarnemers/Obserwatorzy/Observadores/Observatori/Pozorovatelia/ Opazovalci/Tarkkailijat/Observatörer По покана на председателя/Por invitación del presidente/Na pozvání předsedy/Efter indbydelse fra formanden/Auf Einladung des Vorsitzenden/Esimehe kutsel/Με πρόσκληση του Προέδρου/At the invitation of the Chair(wo)man/Sur l’invitation du président/ Na poziv predsjednika/Su invito del presidente/Pēc priekšsēdētāja uzaicinājuma/Pirmininkui pakvietus/Az elnök meghívására/ Fuq stedina taċ-'Chairman'/Op uitnodiging van de voorzitter/Na zaproszenie Przewodniczącego/A convite do Presidente/La invitaţia preşedintelui/Na pozvanie predsedu/Na povabilo predsednika/Puheenjohtajan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
    Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON STATEMENT on the US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021
    COMMON STATEMENT ON THE US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021 The EU and the US wine sectors play a critical role in supporting a vibrant transatlantic trade relationship. This sector is an essential driving force for many rural economies and for a significant number of medium and small enterprises. The undersigned deeply regret that the wine sector, as a notable industry in our two economies is sometimes caught in the crosshairs of unrelated trade disputes, causing economic damage to producers, and putting the millions of jobs that they support at risk. Consumers are also victims of those trading conflicts, which can lead to higher prices and reduced consumer choice. We urge the European Union and the US to resolve current trade disputes, to stop any related retaliatory action against wine exports, and to strengthen their bilateral partnership in order to avoid any sanctions against those sectors, including in the context of the current World Trade Organization Large Civil Aircraft Airbus-Boeing disputes. As legislators and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic, we acknowledge the importance and benefits of strengthening this bilateral partnership. Both the U.S. and the EU are each other’s largest export markets, with the total wine trade reaching more than $5.3 billion (€4.5 billion) annually, creating jobs and investment and supporting sustainable agriculture on both sides of the Atlantic. We ask our governments to further support the economic vitality and diversity of our wine sectors by working to remove all tariffs on wine to achieve a “zero for zero” wine trade environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2018/0178(COD) 17.12.2018 AMENDMENTS 386 - 662 Draft report Bas Eickhout, Sirpa Pietikäinen (PE630.512v01-00) Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Proposal for a regulation (COM(2018)0353 – C8-0207/2018 – 2018/0178(COD)) AM\1172567EN.docx PE632.154v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE632.154v01-00 2/123 AM\1172567EN.docx EN Amendment 386 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 387 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 388 Paul Tang, Pervenche Berès Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 389 Simona Bonafè, Luigi Morgano Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment AM\1172567EN.docx 3/123 PE632.154v01-00 EN 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 390 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or. en Amendment 391 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or.
    [Show full text]
  • Valdis DOMBROVSKIS Executive Vice-President of the European
    European Commission Valdis DOMBROVSKIS Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI Executive Vice-President Member of the European Commission of the European Commission Agriculture An Economy that Works for People Ms Irène Tolleret Member of the European Parliament European Parliament Per e-mail: [email protected] Brussels, 44/oi¡m/l EM/ss, Ares(2021 )s_350474 Dear Honourable Member, We would like to thank you and the co-signatories for your letter of 12 January 2021 requesting the establishment of a compensation fund to help the European wine sector, which is affected by the additional import duties that the United States have applied to certain European wines since 18 October 2019 and covering some additional wine products since 12 January 2021. The Commission is fully aware of the difficulties that the EU wine sector continues to encounter due in particular to these tariffs, but also to the COVID-19 pandemic. As indicated previously, the Commission considers that the best aid to be provided in such circumstances is to allow greater flexibility in the promotion of European wines on third-country markets. The Commission encourages the wine sector to make use of the promotion policy instruments targeting third countries1 and the promotion measure of support programmes in the wine sector (NSPs)2 as they can help consolidate their position on existing markets or seek new opportunities in other markets. Useful flexibilities for operators promoting EU wine in third countries were introduced already in January 20203 and will be extended with the adoption of the prolongation of the COVID-19 package4. 1 More information on the promotion policy and its funding opportunities is available at https://ec.europa.eu/chafea/agri/ 2 Article 45(b) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-11-13 Letter to President Von Der Leyen
    European Commission Ms Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission - sent via e-mail - Brussels, 13 November 2020 Subject: CAP reform - Contradictory signals by the European Commission Dear President, dear Ms von der Leyen, we write to you on behalf of the EPP Members of the European Parliament’s Committee on AGriculture and Rural Development concerninG the on-going interinstitutional negotiations on the CAP reform. We note with Great concern that contradictory positions are beinG taken by the European Commission reGardinG this hiGhly important process. In your letter to the European Greens of 30 October 2020, you clearly state that the Commission is not considering a withdrawal of the CAP reform proposal. On that, you have our full support, not least because both the Council and EP have already taken positions on it. Some of the views recently expressed by Executive Vice President Timmermans call into question central elements of the European Parliament’s position on the CAP reform in terms of environmental and climate sustainability. He has now publically threatened to withdraw the Commission’s proposal if he personally considers the level of ambition to be insufficient on these elements. Those remarks are clearly not in line with your recent letter and with the assurances made when the new Commission was confirmed a year aGo. It is difficult to reconcile such a position with the proper functioninG of the EU’s decision-makinG process and it would lack democratic leGitimacy. It is unacceptable for us. It does not respect the co-leGislators. A Vice President of the European Commission must respect the decisions made by Council and Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Roll Call Votes 3 September 2019
    Committee on Budgets Result of roll-call votes of 3 September 2019 Table of Contents 1. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 1/2019 of the European Union for the financial year 2019, entering the surplus of the financial year 2018 - 2019/2021(BUD) - John Howarth - final vote.........................................................page 2 2. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 2/2019 of the European Union for the financial year 2019 – Reinforcement of key programmes for EU competitiveness: Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ - 2019/2022(BUD) - John Howarth- final vote...........................................................................................................................page 3 3. Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria - 2019/2023(BUD) - Siegfried Mureşan - final vote....page 4 4. Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 3/2019 of the European Union to the general budget 2019 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria - 2019/2024(BUD) - John Howarth - final vote.........................................................page 5 5. Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF/2019/000 TA 2019 - Technical assistance at the initiative
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Care Farming State-Of-The-Art National Report
    2017-1-PL01-KA202-038380 CARE-T-FARMS Care Activities Raising Employment and Training on Farm Adaptation to Responsible and Mental-health Services Care Farming State-of-the-Art European Report https://europa.eu/european-union/about-e 1 Developed by the European Landowners’ Organization in Brussels, Belgium (Marie-Alice Budniok, Maeve Howe, and Servane Morand) February 2018 page 1 of 16 Introduction 1. Theoretical background of care farming at European level. Care farming, also known as “green care”, “social farming”, "farming for health", and "green therapies", has taken on various forms and is organised in different ways in different European countries. There is great variety in the approaches to social farming across Europe, as well as in how it is connected to other sectors and the funding mechanisms that are used. Care farming has taken on many different forms across Europe, broadly based around three different discourses; multifunctional agriculture, public health, and social inclusion. One could say that care farming is most established in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy. Most research in the Netherlands focuses on care farming as part of the agricultural sector and as a new source of farm income. Great importance is also placed on interaction between participants and the farmers and their families. Care farming took off commercially in the Netherlands in the 1990s. It tends to operate on a service-based model. Engaging in care farming activities are seen as a type of social or health service and these activities are paid for directly or indirectly through health insurance. Similarities with the Dutch experience of social farming can be observed in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeding the Future of Sustainable Farming Advanced Farm Machines & Solutions to Deliver on the European Green Deal
    Seeding the Future of Sustainable Farming Advanced farm machines & solutions to deliver on the European Green Deal Virtual #CEMASummit 2021 14th of April PLENARY SESSION – MORNING 9h – 12h Today, more than ever, agriculture matters. The Covid-19 pandemic has reversed any established pattern on the way we live, work and also produce food. The hard work of our farmers, together with technology and advanced agricultural machinery has made it possible to keep a steady supply of food to European citizens every day, everywhere. It is in that challenging moment that the EU revealed plans to move towards more sustainable farming. The EU Green Deal and the CAP, the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies set ambitious targets to protect nature while producing enough food. On the 14th of April, the #CEMASummit 2021 will be the forum to strike a balance, assess progress and connect technology with the challenges EU agriculture faces today on the aspirations for tomorrow. Farmers, ag machinery business leaders, EU decision-makers and various stakeholders will meet virtually to discuss: • Are EU targets to move into more sustainable farming practices aligned with current realities? • What is the role of farm machinery technology in delivering more sustainable agriculture? • Are technology and digital farming tools the key to success? • Are European policies setting the right mechanisms to invest in a sound transition? • Is the new CAP designed to keep a united agri-food sector in Europe? OPENING ADDRESS - A CONVERSATION WITH… Frans Timmermans, Executive
    [Show full text]