Life Cycle of Agrotis Malefida (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a Diapausing Cutworm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life Cycle of Agrotis Malefida (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a Diapausing Cutworm ZOOLOGIA 30 (4): 371–378, August, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702013000400002 Life cycle of Agrotis malefida (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a diapausing cutworm Alexandre Specht1,5, Andrés O. Angulo2, Tania S. Olivares2, Edegar Fronza3, Vânia F. Roque-Specht4, Eduardo Valduga3, Francine Albrecht3, Graziela Poletto3 & Neiva M. Barros3 1 Laboratório de Entomologia, Embrapa Cerrados. Caixa Postal 08223, 73310-970 Planaltina, DF, Brazil. 2 Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad Concepción. Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. 3 Instituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Caixa Postal 1352, 95070-560 Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil. 4 Faculdade UnB Planaltina. Área Universitária 1, Vila Nossa Senhora de Fátima, 73300-000 Planaltina, DF, Brazil. 5 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This study describes the life cycle of Agrotis malefida Guenée, 1852 (Noctuidae: Noctuinae) under laboratory conditions. The insects were reared in a controlled environment (25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours photo phase) and observed daily. The larvae were fed Greene’s artificial diet and adults were offered a 10% sucrose solution. The viability and duration of immature stages were assessed. The experiment initiated with 2,410 eggs. Larvae were isolated shortly after hatching. Longevity, pre-, post- and oviposition, fecundity and fertility of 13 adult couples were also evaluated. The viability of eggs, larvae, pupae and pre-pupae was 96.72, 91.25, 78.37 and 95.26%, respectively. The average duration of egg, larva, pre-pupa, pupa and adult was 7.93, 54.26, 61.61, 37.43 and 12.85 days, respectively. The immature stage of A. malefida lasted an average of 161.29 days, ranging from 102 to 227 days. The life cycle of A. malefida is much longer than that of congeners. The mean fecundity was 1,696.77 eggs and fertility 1,641.15 larvae per female. Under the conditions in which the study was conducted, the biotic potential of A. malefida was of 606,666.59 individuals/female/ year. The results also indicated that this species goes through larval (pre-pupae) and pupal diapause. KEY WORDS. Bionomy; caterpillar; development; diapause. Agrotis Ochsenheimer, 1816 (Noctuidae: Noctuinae: Larvae of A. malefida are polyphagous, attacking various Noctuini) (LAFONTAINE & SCHMIDT 2010) is a cosmopolitan genus herbaceous, native and cultivated plants, including economi- with 317 species (POOLE 1989). All Agrotis larvae are voracious cally relevant crops such as alfalfa, barley, bean, beet, cabbage, and are able to feed on a variety of hosts (KITCHING & RAWLINS cauliflower, clover, coffee, collard, corn, cotton, cowpea, cu- 1998, POGUE 2006). They have underground habits, coming to cumber, flax, garlic, lettuce, melon, oat, onion, pea, pepper, the surface at night to feed. While feeding, they cut the stems potato, rice, rye, sorghum, soybean, squash, strawberry, sun- of their food plants, causing severe damage and rapid crop loss. flower, Swiss chard, tobacco, tomato and wheat (SILVA et al. 1968, When disturbed, Agrotis larvae roll up in a very characteristic VILLATA et al. 1988, COTTO et al. 1995, RIZZO et al. 1995, PASTRANA behavior (BAUDINO 2004, LAFONTAINE 2004, ANGULO et al. 2008). 2004, SPECHT et al. 2004, BAUDINO & VILLARREAL 2007, ANGULO et Agrotis malefida Guenée, 1852 has been recorded from al. 2008). Larvae often build a subterranean tunnel which is most of the Americas (PASTRANA & HERNANDES 1979, RIZZO et al. used as a hiding place during the day, and as a place to eat the 1995, LAFONTAINE 2004) and is likely to occur worldwide (ANGULO host plants cut during the night (LAFONTAINE 2004). & QUEZADA 1975). The species has been widely documented in The economic relevance of A. malefida has motivated the United States and Mexico (LAFONTAINE 2004, POGUE 2006), various studies on the morphology of the adult (ANGULO & Chile (ANGULO & QUEZADA 1975, ANGULO et al. 2008), Argentina QUEZADA 1975) and of immature stages (RIZZO et al. 1995, ANGULO (MARGHERITIS & RIZZO 1965, IGARZÁBAL et al. 1994, RIZZO et al. 1995, et al. 2008), along with biological studies (VILLATA et al. 1988, BAUDINO 2004, PASTRANA 2004), Brazil (SILVA et al. 1968, SPECHT & RIZZO et al. 1995, BAUDINO 2004, BAUDINO & VILLARREAL 2007). CORSEUIL 1996, 2002, SPECHT et al. 2004) and Uruguay Despite the morphological similarities of the adults and the (BENTANCOURT & SCATONI 2006). Larvae of A. malefida are known sympatry of Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel, 1766) and A. malefida in in North America as Pale-Sided Cutworms; in Latin America as the American continent (ANGULO & QUEZADA 1975), previous “gusano áspero”, “oruga áspera” or “oruga cortadora áspera” studies indicate several biological differences, especially in the (LAFONTAINE 2004); and in Brazil as “lagarta-rosca” (SILVA et al. immature stages of A. malefida (VILLATA et al. 1988, RIZZO et al. 1968). 1995, BAUDINO 2004, BAUDINO & VILLARREAL 2007). In view of the © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia | www.sbzoologia.org.br | All rights reserved. 372 A. Specht et al. importance of the species, and its large intraspecific variabil- SILVEIRA NETO et al. (1976) and the following parameters were de- ity (VILLATA et al. 1988, RIZZO et al. 1995), we have endeavored termined: net reproductive rate (Ro), mean generation time (T), to describe the biological parameters and to estimate the bi- natural intrinsic growth rate (rm), and infinite growth rate (⌳). otic potential of A. malefida in the laboratory, using individual Monthly collections of A. malefida moths were made observations on thousands of specimens. within the CARVI (29°08’99"S; 51°31’39"W, 675 m a.s.l.), from January 2007 to December 2008, four nights during each new MATERIAL AND METHODS moon, using light traps as described in SPECHT et al. (2005), in order to obtain information on the period of adult occurrence. Our laboratory rearing experiment initiated with 13 The temporal and morphometric parameters were ana- couples obtained from a mass rearing colony maintained by lyzed using descriptive statistics to calculate the means and stan- the Laboratório de Biologia, Campus Universitário da Região dard errors. When necessary, the means were compared using a dos Vinhedos (CARVI), Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS). t-test assuming unequal variances, at a significance level of 95%. The mass rearing itself originated from individuals collected Voucher specimens (10 couples) were deposited in the in the Vale dos Vinhedos, Bento Gonçalves, state of Rio Grande collection of the CARVI-UCS. do Sul. Our experiments were conducted in a controlled envi- ronment (25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% UR and 14 hours photo phase), RESULTS with daily observations. Each adult couple (n = 13) was maintained inside a cy- Adult stage lindrical plastic container (10 cm diameter, 15 cm height). In The longevity of A. malefida did not significantly differ order to stimulate oviposition, strings of filter-paper of the same between the sexes (p = 0.076), and represented 7.38% of the length as the plastic vial were inserted into each container and developmental cycle (Fig. 1, Table I). Under the conditions of attached using a plastic film cover. The moths were fed an aque- this study, adults of A. malefida reach sexual maturation soon ous sucrose solution (10%), made available in hydrophilic cot- after emergence (Table II). The egg laying period occurs from ton inside a 10 mL glass Erlenmeyer flask. The following the second to the tenth day after sexual maturation, and the parameters were evaluated: fecundity (number of eggs per fe- highest fecundity was observed between the seventh and the male), fertility (number of hatched larvae per female), longev- tenth day (Fig. 2). The fecundity of A. malefida varied greatly ity and duration of pre-oviposition, post-oviposition and between individuals resulting in approximately 1,700 eggs per oviposition periods. female (Table II). During the egg stage, we assessed the viability and dura- tion of the incubation period of five random ovipositions from each couple (including first and last ovipositions), totaling Table I. Survival and duration of the life cycle of Agrotis malefida during different stages of development, under controlled 2,410 eggs. Each egg mass was individually placed in a Petri conditions (25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours photo phase). dish, where it remained until the larvae hatched. The bottom Developmental Survival Duration Inicial-final N Range of each Petri dish was lined using filter paper moistened with stage (%) (days) distilled water, in order to avoid desiccation. Adult 26 – 12.85 ± 3.78 5-22 After hatching, neonate larvae were separately placed in Egg 2,410-2,331 96.72 7.93 ± 1.22 6-10 150 ml plastic cups, covered with a lid, and fed an artificial diet Larvae 2,331-2,127 91.25 54.25 ± 6.39 44-77 (GREENE et al. 1976), previously used successfully by RIZZO et al. Pre-pupae 2,127-1,667 78.37 61.61 ± 17.56 10-131 (1995) for the same species. We evaluated the survival and the Pupae 1,667-1,588 95.26 37.43 ± 4.13 11-99 duration of the larval period of 2,331 individuals. The pre-pu- Total immature 1,588 – 161.29 ± 17.35 102-227 pal period was considered separately, and its onset was recorded Total – 65.89 174.08 – when the larva stopped feeding and decreased in size. We added expanded vermiculite, moistened with distilled water, to each cup, in order to allow the pre-pupae to build a pupal chamber. Table II. Mean fecundity and duration of the pre-, post-, and Pupae were kept in the same containers as pre-pupae. oviposition periods (days) of Agrotis malefida reared under controlled conditions (25 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours photo On the second day after pupation, when the cuticle had hard- phase). (N = 13 couples).
Recommended publications
  • Life History of the Angoumois Grain Moth in Maryland
    2 5 2 8 2 5 :~ Illp·8 11111 . 11111 11111 1.0 1.0 i~ . 3 2 Bkl: 1111/,32 2.2 .,lA 11111 . .2 I" 36 I" .z 11111 .: ~F6 I:' ­ I'· "' I~ :: ~m~ I­.: ,~ ~ l..;L,:,1.O. '- " 1.1 1.1 La.. ,­ -- -- 11111 1.8 111111.25 /////1.4 111111.6 111111.25 1111/1.4 ~ 11111~·6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANOAROS-1963·A NATIONAL BUREAU Dr STAN£1AHOS·1963 A :1<f:~ . TEcliNICALBuLLETIN~~==~~.="=' No. 351 _ '='~.\III~.J.~=~.~=======_ APIUL, 1933 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON. D. C. 'LIFE HISTORY. OF THE ANGOUMOI8. .. ~ GRAIN MOTH IN MARYLAND . • ~J:J By PEREZ SIMM;ONS, Entomologist; and G. W. ~LLINGTON,t Assi8tant Entomologist, . DiVision of StoTed Product In.~ecw, Bureau of Entomology 2 CONTENTS Page Page , :.. Introduction________________________________ 1 Lif",his.tor~OVIp05.lt""l <;letails-Contint:ed.______ ._______________________ ·16 " ~ The AngoumoL. grain moth in wheat and ."'~ ~ corn~ ___ ..... ___ ... ___ .. ________________________ 2 Incubatioll period______________________ 19 Larval period___________________ _________ 20 ::<l ."': Annual cycle of the moth on :Maryland 2 "" _ farms ____________ ,____________________ Pupal period____________________________ 24 f_.~ Ef,Tects of some farm practices on moth Development from hotching to emer· :Ji :',f Increasc._______________________________ 3 gencc_________________________________ 25 Overwintering of the insP.Ct..____________ 3 Effectstemperatl on development Ires ________________________ oC high and low "'_ 28 Spring dispcr.;al to growing wh~aL______ 5 ;.; Thewheat Angoumois________________________________ grain moth in seed _ Comparative rate oC development oC thfi Ii sexes _________________________________.:. 30 <': Dispersal to cornfields ________ ._________ _ 12 Parasit.es____________________________________ 31 ~ - Life-history details ________________________ _ Outbreaks, past and Cuture__________________ 31 Behavior of the adults ________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Aspects of Tiracola Grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.12212 Biological aspects of Tiracola grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a polyphagous armyworm Specht, A.a,b*, Iltchenco, J.b, Fronza, E.b, Roque-Specht, VF.c, Luz, PC.b and Montezzano, DG.b aLaboratório de Entomologia, Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, Km 18, CP 08223, CEP 73310-970 Planaltina, DF, Brazil bPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Universidade de Caxias do Sul – UCS, CP 1352, CEP 95070-560, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil cFaculdade UnB Planaltina, Universidade de Brasília - FUP/UnB, Área Universitária n. 1, Vila Nossa Senhora de Fátima, CEP 73345-010, Planaltina, DF, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received: July 4, 2012 – Accepted: November 27, 2012 – Distributed: February 28, 2014 Abstract We studied the biology of Tiracola grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Hadeninae) at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours of photo phase. Three experiments, using 150 larvae each, were conducted for the larval stage. In the first, used to assess the duration and survival of all stages, insects were reared individually and fed an artificial diet (Grenee). In the second, individuals were also reared separately, but were fed leaves of 10 plants from different families. In the third, the larvae were not individualised, the food plants were rotated such as to provide three plant species every 48 hours. In the first experiment, the viability of the eggs, larvae, pupae and prepupae was 91.9, 94.7, 32.49 and 43.5%, respectively. The average duration of the egg, larvae, prepupae, pupae and adult were 6.0, 25.3, 25.7, 21.4 and 12.7 days, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with New Records and Distributional Data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Rabieh, M. M.; Seraj, A. A.; Gyulai, P.; Esfandiari, M. Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 41, núm. 163, septiembre, 2013, pp. 399-413 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45529269018 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 399-413 Checklist of the Eugno 4/9/13 12:16 Página 399 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 41 (163), septiembre 2013: 399-413 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) M. M. Rabieh, A. A. Seraj, P. Gyulai & M. Esfandiari Abstract A checklist of 9 species and 4 subspecies of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946, in Iran, with remarks, is presented based on the literature and our research results. Furthermore 1 species and 4 subspecies are discussed, as formerly erroneously published taxons from Iran, because of misidentification or mislabeling. Two further subspecies, E. insignata leuconeura (Hampson, 1918) and E. insignata pallescens Christoph, 1893, formerly treated as valid taxons, are downgraded to mere form, both of them occurring in Iran. New data on the distribution of some species of this genus in Iran are also given.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Xestia (Radddea) Alexis
    Zootaxa 3590: 51–62 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EDCF20FD-2E07-416C-AE2D-7260E09D5B05 A revision of the Xestia (Radddea) alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) species-group with a checklist of subgenus Raddea Alphéraky, 1892 and description of brachipterous females (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Noctuinae) VLADIMIR S. KONONENKO1, ANTON V. VOLYNKIN2 & ALEXEI YU. MATOV3 1Laboratory of Entomology, Institute of Biology and Soil Science Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, RF-690022 Vladivostok, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Tigirek State Nature Reserve, Nikitina str. 111, RF-656049, Barnaul, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Entomology, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences RF-199034 Sankt-Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The subgenus Raddea Alphéraky, 1892 of the genus Xestia Hübner, 1818 is reviewed. A checklist of 29 described species is presented, with 26 new combinations (comb. n.) introduced. Two taxa, Xestia (Raddea) alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) and Xestia (Raddea) herrichschaefferi (Alphéraky, 1895) are revised, and three new synonyms are introduced (X. alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) = Estimata oschi Kozhanchikov, 1937, syn. n.; = Estimata militzae Kozhanchikov, 1937 syn. n.; Protolampra sobrina (Duponchel, 1843) = Estimata dailingensis Chen, 1984, syn. n.). The name alexis Kozhanchikov, 1937 is recognized as unjustified emendation. Lectotypes for X. alexis and X. herrichschaefferi are designated; brac- hypterous females for X. alexii and X. herrichschaefferi are described. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Xestia, Raddea, Estimata, taxonomic notes, new synonymy, new com- bination, Russia, South Siberia Introduction Xestia Hübner, 1818 (type-species Noctua ochreago Hübner, 1790) is the largest genus of the tribe Noctuini (Noctuidae) with about 200 species occurring around the World.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera
    Chapter 6 Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera Michael D. Greenfield Abstract Pair formation in moths typically involves pheromones, but some pyra- loid and noctuoid species use sound in mating communication. The signals are generally ultrasound, broadcast by males, and function in courtship. Long-range advertisement songs also occur which exhibit high convergence with commu- nication in other acoustic species such as orthopterans and anurans. Tympanal hearing with sensitivity to ultrasound in the context of bat avoidance behavior is widespread in the Lepidoptera, and phylogenetic inference indicates that such perception preceded the evolution of song. This sequence suggests that male song originated via the sensory bias mechanism, but the trajectory by which ances- tral defensive behavior in females—negative responses to bat echolocation sig- nals—may have evolved toward positive responses to male song remains unclear. Analyses of various species offer some insight to this improbable transition, and to the general process by which signals may evolve via the sensory bias mechanism. 6.1 Introduction The acoustic world of Lepidoptera remained for humans largely unknown, and this for good reason: It takes place mostly in the middle- to high-ultrasound fre- quency range, well beyond our sensitivity range. Thus, the discovery and detailed study of acoustically communicating moths came about only with the use of electronic instruments sensitive to these sound frequencies. Such equipment was invented following the 1930s, and instruments that could be readily applied in the field were only available since the 1980s. But the application of such equipment M. D. Greenfield (*) Institut de recherche sur la biologie de l’insecte (IRBI), CNRS UMR 7261, Parc de Grandmont, Université François Rabelais de Tours, 37200 Tours, France e-mail: [email protected] B.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IPM for High Tunnel Vegetables: Practical Pathways for Organic Crop Production Focusing on Insect and Mite
    IPM for High Tunnel Vegetables: Practical Pathways for Organic Crop Protection Focusing on Insect and Mite Pest Issues MOFGA Farmer to Farmer Conference November 2019 Who Are We? • Margaret Skinner, UVM Entomologist Biological Control of Key Pests Western Flower Thrips (greenhouses) Aphids (high tunnel vegetables) • Ron Valentin, Bioworks, Technical Specialist Biological Control of Key Pests Banker plants Beneficials • Pooh Sprague, Edgewater Farm, Grower Owner/Operator Vegetable market garden Greenhouse ornamentals Who Are YOU? Wisdom from Benjamin Franklin • TELL Me and I FORGET • TEACH ME and I may Remember • INVOLVE ME and I LEARN Today’s Multi- Faceted Program • Step-by-step IPM approach to insect pests: Me • Success with Biological Control: Ron • Welcome to the “Real World”: Pooh • Open discussion us us us us Lao Tzu, 4th Century BC Appearance of Insects 350 300 250 200 150 100 Millions of years Millions 50 0 Homo erectus: 6 million years Homo sapiens: 200,000 years So what? So… How can we DEAL WITH IT? IPM What is IPM? IPM = Integrated Pest Management Integration of several strategies to reduce pests using pesticides as little as possible A Step-by-Step Process for Tackling Pests To succeed with IPM, follow these words of wisdom: Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster. Sun Tzu, 1753-1818 The Corner Stones Pest ID What is it? I What does it do? Scouting P How many are there? Where are they? M Biology How does it do it? When does it do it? What’s in a NAME? • Class Insecta is separated into Orders • Insect Orders are separated into FAMILIES • Families are separated into GENERA • Each Genus is separated into SPECIES Scientific Name Genus Species Author Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Order Hemiptera, Family Aphididae) Common Names green peach aphid or peach-potato aphid Some Dead and Some Alive Know your friends and your enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]