Engaging Paul Ricoeur's Work on Memory, History, And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository Engaging Paul Ricoeur’s work on memory, history, and forgetting: in search of an adequate methodology for church and theological historiography Helené van Tonder Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology at Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Dr. R.R. Vosloo December 2010 DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the authorship owner thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: 2 August 2010 Signature: Copyright © 2010 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved 2 ABSTRACT Life in the present is never only about the present, but notably also about the past and the future. In this study the problematic of the representation of the past is addressed in search of a responsible historical hermeneutic. It is argued that historical hermeneutics is about the past, the present and the future, and, above all, the relation that exists between them. Historical hermeneutics facilitates our understanding of the past from our position in the present and creates meaningful ways in which we may anticipate the future. In this study I aim to contribute to the development of responsible historical hermeneutic for church and theology, especially in South Africa. To do so, I engage with the magisterial work of the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, Mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli who, I believe, proposes valuable signposts for us to reckon with on our way to a responsible historical hermeneutic. A general introduction is given to theological historiography and the development thereof in South Africa, pointing towards reasons why it is important for responsible historical hermeneutics to exist. The work of Paul Ricoeur is introduced as a valuable partner to dialogue with in this respect. A brief intellectual biography is given regarding Ricoeur’s work in order to indicate where and how his last work fits into and forms a part of his life’s work. The third chapter of the study is an outline and discussion of Ricoeur’s work, Memory, History, Forgetting. The discussion follows the order of Ricoeur’s work itself, and I try to indicate the main lines in Ricoeur’s argument, yet giving credit to him for the thorough way in which he deals with the respective themes by engaging the disciplines of philosophy, history, sociology, neurosciences etc. Subsequently I propose certain themes from Ricoeur’s work that is important for the church historian and historical theologian as signposts towards an adequate historiographical methodology. 3 OPSOMMING Lewe in die hede het nie net met die hede te make nie, maar op ‘n besondere manier ook met die verlede en die toekoms. In hierdie studie word die problematiek van die representasie van die verlede aangespreek in ‘n poging om verantwoordelike historiese hermeneutiek te bevorder. Die argument word gevoer dat historiese hermeneutiek te make het met die verlede, die hede, en die toekoms, en bowenal die verhouding waarin dit met mekaar staan. Historiese hermeneutiek fasiliteer ons verstaan van die verlede vanuit ons posisie in die hede en skep betekenisvolle maniere waarop die toekoms geantisipeer kan word. Die studie het ten doel om by te dra tot die ontwikkeling van verantwoordelike historiese hermeneutiek vir die kerk en vir teologie, veral in Suid-Afrika. Met hierdie doel voor oë, word die grootse werk van die Franse filosoof Paul Ricoeur, Mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, bestudeer. Die bruikbare bakens op weg na verantwoordelike historiese hermeneutiek wat Ricoeur voorstel, word uitgewys. ‘n Algemene inleiding tot teologiese historiografie en die ontwikkeling daarvan in Suid- Afrika word gegee, en die belangrikheid van verantwoordelike historiese hermeneutiek sodoende uitgewys. Die werk van Paul Ricoeur word daarna ingelei as ‘n waardevolle bron in hierdie gesprek. ‘n Opsommende intellektuele biografie van Ricoeur se werk word gegee om aan te dui waar en hoe Ricoeur se laaste werke aansluit by sy ander werke. Die derde hoofstuk van die studie is ‘n uiteensetting en bespreking van Ricoeur se werk, Mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Die bespreking volg die verloop van Ricoeur se werk self, en daar word gepoog om die belangrikste lyne van Ricoeur se argument uit te lig. Terselfdertyd word erkenning gegee aan Ricoeur vir die deeglikheid waarmee hy met ‘n wye verskeidenheid temas en dissiplines omgaan: filosofie, geskiedenis, sosiologie, neurowetenskappe, ens. Ten slotte word sekere temas van Ricoeur se werk uitgelig wat belangrik is vir die kerkgeskiedkundige en die historiese teoloog as bakens op weg na ‘n voldoende historiografiese metodologie. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the role of a few people in the writing of this thesis. Thank you to my mother, Joey, my father, Gerhard, and my brothers Jaco and Neil for loving me and creating wonderful spaces (where life is possible, joyful, and precious) in which I may live. Thank you to those people who inspire, challenge, support, and accept me, and who make living the daily exercise of redefining things. Thank you, especially, for making me laugh. I gladly and gratefully call you my friends. A special word of thanks goes to Linsen Loots for proofreading my work on short notice. The writing of this thesis was an exciting, challenging and enriching experience. Thank you to Dr Robert Vosloo for guiding me in this task, for providing insight on the way, and for introducing me to the wealth of academic theology. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engaging Paul Ricoeur‟s work on memory, history, and forgetting: ........................... 1 in search of an adequate methodology for church and theological historiography ..... 1 DECLARATION .......................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1 ............................................................................................................... 9 SOUTH AFRICAN CHURCH AND THEOLOGICAL HISTORIOGRAPHY: CHALLENGED BY A HERMENEUTICAL DEFICIT ................................................... 9 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 9 2. Historiography as an act of sense-making .................................................. 10 3. South African church and theological historiography .................................. 12 4. Towards a responsible historical hermeneutic ............................................ 15 5. The promise of Paul Ricoeur‟s thought for a responsible historical hermeneutic .......................................................................................................... 18 5.1. Memory ...................................................................................................... 19 5.2. History ........................................................................................................ 21 5.3. Forgetting ................................................................................................... 22 6. Ricoeur and theology .................................................................................. 23 CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................................................. 26 RICOEUR‟S INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY ............................................................ 26 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 26 2. Ricoeur‟s early years ................................................................................... 28 3. A hermeneutical phenomenology: between freedom and nature ................ 31 4. The hermeneutical turn ............................................................................... 33 5. Rediscovering the role of narrative .............................................................. 38 6. Memory and mourning, melancholy and forgetting ..................................... 43 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................. 45 MEMORY, HISTORY, FORGETTING: RICOEUR‟S ARGUMENT ........................... 45 6 1. The Phenomenon of Memory ............................................................................ 46 1.1. Memory as a phenomenon in Western philosophy: the entanglement of memory and imagination ...................................................................................... 46 1.2. The uses and abuses of memory ................................................................ 50 1.3. The memory of the individual or the memory of the collective .................... 53 1.4. The attribution of memory: ego, collectives, and close relations ................. 56 2. Knowing History: The Epistemology of Historical Knowledge ........................... 59 2.1. The ambiguity of historical knowledge: Plato‟s Phaedrus ........................... 61 2.2. The documentary phase ............................................................................. 63 2.2.1. The movement from memory to history on the level of space and time 63 2.2.2. The notion of testimony in Ricoeur‟s work ............................................ 68 2.2.3. From testimony to archive ......................................................................