Minutes of Proceedings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Northern Ireland Peace Initiative
Northern Ireland Peace Initiative JOURNEY TO BELFAST AND LONDON Report and Policy Recommendations by William J. Flynn and George D. Schwab February 1999 Contents • Acknowledgment • Foreword • Policy Recommendations • From Hate to Hope • Conclusion ACKNOWLEDGMENT At the invitation of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, a National Committee on American Foreign Policy mission consisting of William J. Flynn, chairman, and George D. Schwab, president, spent a week (November 2-7, 1998) in Belfast discussing the peace process in Northern Ireland and in London where we also discussed U.S. and British global security interests with leading statesmen, politicians, diplomats, and academics. The meetings took place at Stormont Estate, 10 Downing Street, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the House of Commons, think tanks, and the American embassy in London, among other sites. Before embarking, Dr. Schwab was briefed at the State Department by James I. Gadsden, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Canadian affairs; James M. Lyons, special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; Katharine E. Koch, special assistant, office of the special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; and Patricia Nelson-Douvelis, Ireland desk officer. Although this report and the policy recommendations it contains focus on Northern Ireland, the material gathered on U.S. and British national security interests will be incorporated in relevant NCAFP publications, including those forthcoming on NATO and the Middle East. The sensitivity of some of the issues discussed led a number of people to request that they not be quoted by name or identified in other ways. -
February 2004
Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Northern Ireland Quarterly Report February 2004 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Devolution Monitoring Programme Northern Ireland report 18 February 2004 • Assembly election ends in triumph for DUP, SF • Result means continued suspension of devolution • Review of Belfast agreement opens amid low expectations • Ministers continue business-as-usual decision-making 2 Contents 1. Summary Robin Wilson ..............................................4 2. The ‘peace process’ Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson ..................5 2.1 The post-election scene ......................................................................................5 2.2 The review...........................................................................................................5 2.3 Prospects ...........................................................................................................13 3. Devolved government Robin Wilson ............................................16 3.1 Does it matter? .................................................................................................16 3.2 Programme for Government ..........................................................................16 3.3 Community relations .......................................................................................17 4. The assembly Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson ................20 5. The media Robin Wilson ............................................21 -
OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Vol u m e 2 (15 February 1999 to 15 July 1999) BELFAST: THE STATIONERY OFFICE LTD £70.00 © Copyright The New Northern Ireland Assembly. Produced and published in Northern Ireland on behalf of the Northern Ireland Assembly by the The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Northern Ireland Assembly publications. ISBN 0 339 80001 1 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS (A = Alliance Party; NIUP = Northern Ireland Unionist Party; NIWC = Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition; PUP = Progressive Unionist Party; SDLP = Social Democratic and Labour Party; SF = Sinn Fein; DUP = Ulster Democratic Unionist Party; UKUP = United Kingdom Unionist Party; UUP = Ulster Unionist Party; UUAP = United Unionist Assembly Party) Adams, Gerry (SF) (West Belfast) Kennedy, Danny (UUP) (Newry and Armagh) Adamson, Ian (UUP) (East Belfast) Leslie, James (UUP) (North Antrim) Agnew, Fraser (UUAP) (North Belfast) Lewsley, Patricia (SDLP) (Lagan Valley) Alderdice of Knock, The Lord (Initial Presiding Officer) Maginness, Alban (SDLP) (North Belfast) Armitage, Pauline (UUP) (East Londonderry) Mallon, Seamus (SDLP) (Newry and Armagh) Armstrong, Billy (UUP) (Mid Ulster) Maskey, Alex (SF) (West Belfast) Attwood, Alex (SDLP) (West Belfast) McCarthy, Kieran (A) (Strangford) Beggs, Roy (UUP) (East Antrim) McCartney, Robert (UKUP) (North Down) Bell, Billy (UUP) (Lagan Valley) McClarty, David (UUP) (East Londonderry) Bell, Eileen (A) (North Down) McCrea, Rev William (DUP) (Mid Ulster) Benson, Tom (UUP) (Strangford) McClelland, Donovan (SDLP) (South -
Annual Report 2004
Annual Report & Accounts 2004 Contents The Board 4 Chairman’s Report 6 Focus on Community Initiatives 10 Community Capacity Building 16 Community Leadership Programme 17 Communities in Transition Programme 18 Community Bridges Programme 20 Wider Horizons Programme 22 KEY (Knowledge through Enterprise for Youth) Programme 25 LET (Learning and Educating Together) Programme 30 Regeneration of Deprived Areas 32 Community Regeneration Improvement Special Programme (CRISP) 33 Border Towns and Villages Programme (BTV) 34 Rural Development Programme (RDP) 35 Special Projects 38 Economic Development 40 Business Enterprise and Technology Programme 41 newradiane - (Research and Development between Ireland 43 and North America or Europe) Tourism Programme 44 Urban Development Programme 47 Community Property Development Scheme (CPDS) 47 Second Community Projects 48 Flagships Programme 48 Investment Companies 50 Accounts 52 Appendices 68 Annual Report & Accounts 2004 3 The Board Board Observers Mr William T McCarter, Chairman Mr Manfred Beschel (European Union) Mr J Hewitt Dr JJ Herron (Australia) Miss H Kirkpatrick Mr R Marshall (New Zealand) Mr C Millikin (Canada) Ms C Lynch Ms P Noonan (USA) Mr J McDaid Mr E Murtagh Joint Directors General Ms D Ryan Mr N Burgess Mr A Smith Board Members, Observers and Joint Directors General Front row, left to right: Carmel Lynch, Gene Murtagh, Helen Kirkpatrick, William T. McCarter (Chairman), Deirdre Ryan, John McDaid and Jackie Hewitt. Back row, left to right: Alexander Smith (Joint Director General), Russell Marshall (New Zealand Observer), Manfred Beschel (European Union Observer), Cameron Millikin (Canadian Observer), John Herron (Australian Observer), Bob Waters (Alternate United States Observer) and Niall Burgess (Joint Director General). -
Leninist Perspective on Triumphant Irish National-Liberation Struggle
Only he is a Marxist who extends the rec- Subscriptions (£30 p.a. or £15 six months - pay og Bulletin Publications) and circulation: £3 nition of the class struggle to the recogni- Economic & tion of the dictatorship of the proletariat. p&p epsr, po box 76261, This is the touchstone on which the real Philosophic London sw17 1GW [Post Office Registered.] Books understanding and recognition of Marxism e-Mail: [email protected] is to be tested. V.I.Lenin Science Review Website — WWW.epsr.orG.uk Vol 22 EPSR books Volume 22 fear and shattered confidence, or failed to understand why the visit was so damaging in the Leninist perspective on triumphant first place. Giving a US visa and full freedom to be internation- Irish national-liberation struggle ally reported and quoted to the figure most publicly associated Part 3 (Feb 1994–Feb 1996) with the armed revolutionary challenge to British imperial- ism’s continued domination over a colonised part of Ireland, is sensationally damaging in more ways than one. Obviously, all the cadres of the national-liberation struggle and all of its supporters world- wide will receive an enormous boost from seeing Adams dance rings round the plodding British attempts to hide the truth about its vicious repression and to tell lies about the resistance to it by the IRA and Sinn Féin. Obviously, the representa- tives of British imperialism on the ground, – the soldiers, the administration of the police- military dictatorship, and the Orange colonist settler commu- nity posing as ‘British Irishmen’, – will feel more disheartened than ever and are already show- ing the signs of making more and more of the mistakes that will come from demoralisation. -
Ulster Unionist Dimension in the Usa 2004
ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte PhD 2004 ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte, DEUG, Licence, Maîtrise For the Degree of PhD Dublin City University School of Law and Government Supervisor: Dr. John Doyle October 2004 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of a Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In memory of Alain Janey, my grand-father, without whom, all of this would never have been possible. To my family and friends who constantly supported me. This thesis is theirs as without them, the road to achievement would have been considerably more difficult. I would like to thank Dr. John Doyle, my Ph.D. supervisor, for his guidance and hard work during all those years. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. David E. Schmitt for showing me the way when I did not know which direction to take. 1 am very grateful to all the people who helped me, all the interviewees and those who contributed to make this thesis feasible by providing crucial material or the right context at the right time. -
Zürcher Beiträge
Zürcher Beiträge zur Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktforschung Nr. 68 Tina Kempin Ready for Peace? The Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland 1998–2002 Hrsg.: Andreas Wenger Forschungsstelle für Sicherheitspolitik der ETH Zürich Contents List of Abbreviations 7 Foreword 5 Note on Terminology 10 Introduction 11 1 The Good Friday Agreement: Background, Content and Assessment 27 1.1 A Short Background to the Belfast Agreement 28 1.2 Content: Constitutional and Institutional Changes, Policy Issues 36 1.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of the Agreement 52 2 Implementing the Good Friday Agreement: The Main Factors and Positions 57 2.1 Between Progress and Caution: The British and Irish Approaches 60 2.2 The Struggle for the Union: The Unionist and Loyalist Positions 70 2.3 The Quest for Irish Unity: The Nationalist and Republican Approaches 82 2.4 International Infl uences 92 3 Implementing the Good Friday Agreement: The Core Questions 103 3.1 The Question of Identity 104 3.2 Decommissioning of Paramilitary Weapons, Police Reform and Prisoner Release 116 3.3 Negotiations with (Former) Terrorists? 139 Outlook for the Future 145 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 159 Annex I Annex A The Agreement Reached in the Multi-Party Negotiations 1998 (Belfast Agreement, Good Friday Agreement) III Annex B Chronology of the Implementation Process, 1998–2002 XLV Annex C Map of Northern Ireland LIV List of Tables and Illustrations Table 1.1 Assembly Elections – Results by Party 43 Table 3.1 Religion and Ethnic Identity, 1989–1998 106 Table 3.2 Religion -
Northern Ireland
WORKING PAPER N. 1-2017 Brexit and the Future of Northern Ireland John Doyle* and Eileen Connolly** Abstract The paper examines Brexit and the Northern Ireland question, arguing that the withdrawal of the UK from the EU creates tremendous difficulties for the region. As the paper explains, the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland is the only physical frontier between the EU and the UK, and the introduction of a hard border would have huge impact: first, on free movement of goods, with implications for the economy; second on free movement of people, with effect on the Common Travel Area which has existed there since the 1920s; and thirdly on the peace process, potentially threatening the endurance of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, which put an end to over 40 years of sectarian conflict. As the paper underlines, given the peculiar situation of Northern Ireland, specific solution ought to be identified – and a number of options can be considered. In terms of free movement of goods, the paper points to the Cyprus model, where good produced in Northern Cyprus can enter into Cyprus without custom duties. In terms of free movement of people, it suggests that, given the insular nature of Ireland, immigration controls could be moved into the Irish Sea. And in terms of the peace process, it recommends that the spirit if not the letter of the Good Friday Agreement be preserved, notably by avoiding any symbol of division (such as a hard border) which may catalyze opposition. As the paper concluses, however, both the UK and the EU seem fully cognizant of the sensitivity of the Northern Irish question, which raises some optimism on the possibility of finding a pragmatic solution for the region. -
Minutes of Proceedings
No. 1/98 THE NEW NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS WEDNESDAY 1 JULY 1998 The Assembly met at 2.06 pm, the Initial Presiding Officer in the Chair 1. Preliminary Matters 1.1 The following letters, received from the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, were read: dated 29 June 1998 - Appointment of Initial Presiding Officer, and date, time and place of first meeting. dated 29 June 1998 - Specific matters referred to the Assembly. dated 1 July 1998 - Extension of initial agenda to enable adjournment debate. 1.2 The statutory remit of the Assembly was read. 1.3 Users of a language other than English were asked to provide a translation. 1.4 Mobile telephone and pager users were asked to leave the devices outside the Chamber, or alternatively, in respect of pagers, for this meeting only to switch to ’vibration’ mode. 2. Roll of Members Members signed the Roll and indicated a designation of identity. The following Members signed: Eileen Bell, Seamus Close, David Ford, Kieran McCarthy, Sean Neeson, Monica McWilliams, Jane Morrice, David Ervine, Billy Hutchinson, Gerry Adams, Bairbre de Brun, Michelle Gildernew, Gerry Kelly, John Kelly, Alex Maskey, Barry McElduff, Martin McGuinness, Gerry McHugh, Mitchel McLaughlin, Pat McNamee, Francie Molloy, Conor Murphy, Mick Murphy, Mary Nelis, Dara O’Hagan, Alex Atwood, P J Bradley, Joe Byrne, John Dallat, Arthur Doherty, Mark Durkan, Sean Farren, John Fee, Tommy Gallagher, Carmel Hanna, Denis Haughey, Joe Hendron, John Hume, Patricia Lewsley, Alban Maginness, Séamus Mallon, Donovan McClelland, -
The Northern Ireland Assembly
No. 1/99 NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS MONDAY 6 DECEMBER 1999 The Assembly met at 10.30 am, the Presiding Officer in the Chair 1. Personal Prayer or Meditation 1.1 Members observed two minutes’ silence. 2. Statutory Committee Business 2.1 Motion Proposed: That this Assembly confirms ‘MLA’ as designatory letters for Assembly Members. [Mr F Cobain] [Mr D Haughey] After debate, the Question being put, the Motion was carried without division. 2.2 Motion Proposed: After Standing Order 57 insert a new Standing Order: Standing Committee on European Affairs 1. There shall be a Standing Committee of the Assembly to be known as the Standing Committee on European Affairs. 2. It shall consider and review on an ongoing basis: (a) matters referred to it in relation to European Union issues; and (b) any other related matter or matters determined by the Assembly. 199 3. The Committee shall have powers to call for persons and papers. 4. The procedures of the Committee shall be such as the Committee shall determine. [Mr F Cobain] [Mr D Haughey] After debate, the Question being put, the Motion was carried without division. 2.3 Motion Proposed: After Standing Order 57 insert a new Standing Order: Committee on Equality, Human Rights and Community Relations 1. There shall be a Standing Committee of the Assembly to be known as the Equality, Human Rights and Community Relations Committee. 2. It shall consider and review on an ongoing basis: (a) matters referred to it in relation to Equality, Human Rights and Community Relations; and (b) any other related matter or matters determined by the Assembly. -
Seanad Éireann
Vol. 207 Wednesday, No. 7 26 January 2011 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Wednesday, 26 January 2011. Order of Business …………………………………341 Death of Former Member: Expressions of Sympathy ……………………355 Criminal Justice (Public Order) Bill 2010: Second Stage …………………363 Business of Seanad ………………………………370 Criminal Justice (Public Order) Bill 2010: Second Stage (resumed) and Subsequent Stages … … … 370 National Monument at 14-16 Moore Street, Dublin: Statements ………………373 SEANAD ÉIREANN ———— Dé Céadaoin, 26 Eanáir 2011. Wednesday, 26 January 2011. ———— Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Order of Business Senator Donie Cassidy: The Order of Business is No. 1, Criminal Justice (Public Order) Bill 2010 — Second and Subsequent Stages, to be taken at the conclusion of the tributes to the late Séamus Dolan, which will be taken immediately after the Order of Business, adjourn at 1.45 p.m. and resume at 5.30 p.m., if not previously concluded, on Second Stage of which spokes- persons may speak for ten minutes and all other Senators for seven minutes and Senators may share time, by agreement of the House; and No. 2, statements on the national monument at 14-16 Moore Street, Dublin 1, to be taken at 4 p.m. and conclude not later than 5.30 p.m. The business of the House shall be interrupted between 1.45 p.m. and 4 p.m. Senator Frances Fitzgerald: We see again this morning that the uncertainty with the Finance Bill is continuing, especially in the approach some of the Independent Deputies are taking. -
The Rosemary Nelson Inquiry Report Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons Dated 23 May 2011 For
The Rosemary Nelson Inquiry Report Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 23 May 2011 for The Rosemary Nelson Inquiry Report Chairman: Sir Michael Morland Panel: Dame Valerie Strachan DCB Sir Anthony Burden O St J, QPM Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 23 May 2011 HC 947 LONDON: THE STATIONERY OFFICE £58.50 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is also available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102971071 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002414366 04/11 5085 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Delivered to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland in terms of Section 44 of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998: Sir Michael Morland Dame Valerie Strachan DCB Sir Anthony Burden O St J, QPM Table of Contents Chapter Title Page Foreword . 5. Chronology . .7 . Abbreviations . 11. Part A The Murder of Rosemary Nelson . .17 . 1 The Genesis of the Inquiry . 19. 2 The Course of the Inquiry . .25 . 3 Rosemary Nelson’s Background and Early Career . .27 .