DOCSLIB.ORG

State Water Project: Aging Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Water Project: Aging Infrastructure STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 10/20) Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. 2021-22 3860 Water Resources Budget Request Name Program Subprogram 3860-016-BCP-2021-GB 3240 Budget Request Description State Water Project: Aging Infrastructure Budget Request Summary This proposal requests authority for a total of 150 permanent full-time positions funded by the State Water Project (SWP) to be phased in over four years as follows: 67 positions in 2021-22; 35 positions in 2022-23; 32 positions in 2023-24; and 16 positions in 2024-25; to address the following State Water Project initiatives: On-Going Maintenance, Asset Management/Maintenance Management and Affordability, Engineering & Technical, California Aqueduct Subsidence and Emergency Action Planning, emergency preparedness, and physical security enhancements. Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed ☐ Yes ☒ No Does this BCP contain information technology Department CIO Date (IT) components? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign. For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document (FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date. Project No.Click or tap here to enter text.Project Approval Document: Approval Date: If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? ☐ Yes ☐ No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee. Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date Coe Hall 12/30/2020 Duard MacFarland 1/6/2021 Department Director Date Agency Secretary Date Kathie Kishaba 1/6/2021 Amanda Martin 1/6/2021 Department of Finance Use Only Additional Review: ☐ Capital Outlay ☐ ITCU ☐ FSCU ☐ OSAE ☐ Dept. of Technology PPBA Date submitted to the Legislature Sergio Aguilar 1/8/2021 Analysis of Problem A. Budget Request Summary The Department of Water Resources (DWR)requests authority for a total of 150 permanent full-time positions funded by the State Water Project (SWP) to be phased in over four years as follows: 67 positions in 2021-22; 35 positions in 2022-23; 32 positions in 2023-24; and 16 positions in 2024-25; to address the following State Water Project initiatives: On-Going Maintenance, Asset Management/Maintenance Management and Affordability, Engineering & Technical, California Aqueduct Subsidence and Emergency Action Planning , emergency preparedness, and physical security enhancements. This request addresses specific DWR actions included in the Governor’s Water Resilience Portfolio, which prioritizes the rehabilitation of infrastructure damaged by subsidence and the implementation of risk-informed asset management plans for critical SWP infrastructure: • Proposal 19.3 (subsidence rehabilitation of critical infrastructure) and • Proposal 19.5 (risk-informed asset management plans for critical SWP infrastructure). These new actions require dedicated staff to perform new functions in addition to existing SWP program activities. The proposed positions will provide DWR with the resources and means to: Increase maintenance, refurbishment, repair, and replacement of aging infrastructure which is required to continue to meet the demands of the SWP and support the increased flexibility being requested to support water resiliency. Continue to develop and implement DWR’s Asset Management Program which optimizes, prioritizes and financially plans for projects to address aging infrastructure based on risk; enhance condition assessment and maintenance programs, and facilitate increased design, construction and inspection projects for an aging infrastructure. Perform studies, expand existing maintenance and facility inspections, execute preventative design and construction efforts, develop new or update existing guidelines and standards, adopt new technologies and system enhancements, Continue to address the adverse effects of subsidence along the SWP by implementing design, environmental permitting, and construction activities that will optimize resiliency and improve operational flexibility of the SWP as well as support safe and reliable delivery of water. Implement new Dam Safety Emergency Action Planning (EAP), emergency preparedness, and physical security enhancements. To respond timely, safely, and cost effectively to urgent or emergency work as defined by Public Contract Code §10122 et. seq. and other Executive, Legislative, or Regulatory mandates. B. Background/History Managed by DWR, the SWP is the largest state-built, multi-purpose water project in the United States, and one of the largest in the world. SWP funding was authorized by the California Legislature in 1959 and approved by voters in 1960 through the Burns-Porter Act. The Burns-Porter Act expressly authorized the State of California to enter into contracts for the sale, delivery, or use of the water made available by the State Water Resources Development System (California Water Code [CWC] 12937(b)). In return for the state financing, constructing, operating, and maintaining the facilities needed to provide water service, the 29 public water agencies contractually agreed to pay all associated SWP capital and operating costs including the 1.75 billion in bonds used to construct the SWP facilities. The resources in this request will be funded pursuant to CWC 12937 (b). DWR is an integral part of that growth through water delivery, pumping and hydroelectric plants operation, water movement and storage, and operation of dams up and down California. 1 California communities developed near SWP infrastructure due to the flood protection and water security the infrastructure provides. The infrastructure requires continuous maintenance, refurbishment and upgrades to meet the growing demands for water supply, clean energy, and flood protection under increased pressures of climate change. The SWP provides a supplemental water supply to approximately 27 million Californians and 750,000 acres of irrigated farmland. Seventy percent of SWP water goes to urban users and thirty percent to agriculture. The system conveys an annual average of 2.6 million acre-feet of water to 29 public agencies that purchase SWP water for distribution within their respective areas. The system’s facilities include 35 storage facilities, reservoirs and lakes; 21 pumping plants; 4 pumping- generating plants; 5 hydroelectric power plants; and more than 700 miles aqueducts, canals, tunnels, and pipelines, the highest pumping lift in the United States, Edmonston Pumping Plant, and the tallest dam in the nation, Oroville Dam. The system also provides flood control, hydroelectric power generation, recreational opportunities and ecosystem enhancements. Along the San Luis Field Division and San Joaquin Field Division, portions of the aqueduct were built to control subsidence. Canal embankments and structures were originally built higher to accommodate future subsidence. However, some canal embankments had to be raised in the 80’s and 90’s. During the 2014 to 2017 drought there was a vertical change of 2.75 feet and at least a 20 percent conveyance capacity reduction. As subsidence settlement continues, there will be a significant reduction of flow capacity (cfs), loss of operational flexibility, increased costs to deliver water, more Aqueduct failures, and reduced ability to utilize renewable energy sources. As part of the California Aqueduct Subsidence program, efforts have been taken to identify where subsidence is impacting the SWP, how much it is impacting water deliveries and what the near- and long-term solutions are. This includes evaluating 50 years of precise surveys and working with National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to monitor and assess rates of subsidence using satellite mapping; conducting research and hydraulic modeling and assessing impacts to SWP structures and operations; and identifying, evaluating and selecting remediation alternatives as well as evaluating potential areas of future subsidence. The failure of the Oroville Dam Flood Control Spillway in February 2017 highlighted the importance of committing sufficient resources to inspect, assess conditions, set priorities, meet regulatory compliance obligations, and maintain the SWP including its regulated dams and approximately 700 miles of aqueducts, canals, tunnels and pipelines. Of the 26 regulated dams, 22 are under the jurisdiction of the State Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), with 11 of those also under the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The remaining four dams are part of the state/federal San Luis Joint Use Facilities and are owned by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). In compliance with DSOD and FERC regulations, DWR’s Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Dam Safety Services (DSS) convenes an independent consulting board (Board), on 5 -year cycles to review dam performance data and operation and maintenance records, participate in comprehensive inspections, and produce a report of categorized findings and recommendations. The recommendations typically require follow-up actions that are undertaken and managed by DSS. FERC and DSOD also participate in the conduct of these Boards. Subsequent to each Board meeting, DSS develops the scope of work, schedule, budget, and resources needed to address each of the findings and recommendations. Each scope of work can range in complexity from minor assessments to major dam alterations. Major alterations could include seismic remediation of dam foundations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Committee San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting
    San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting Documents April 25, 2019 Committee Administrative and Finance Engineering and Operations Imported Water Legislation and Public Outreach Water Planning and Environmental Formal Board On April 9, Congress passed implementing legislation for the Drought Contingency Plan, capping years of collaborative efforts among the seven Colorado River Basin states and the Bureau of Page 1 of 146 Reclamation to minimize the impacts of long-term drought in the river basin. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ AND STANDING COMMITTEES’ REGULAR MEETING APRIL 25, 2019 BOARD ROOM WATER AUTHORITY HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 4677 OVERLAND AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 1. UNIFIED AGENDA: This unified agenda provides a brief description of each item to be considered by the Board and its Administrative and Finance, Engineering and Operations, Imported Water, Legislation and Public Outreach, and Water Planning Committees. For convenience, the agenda for each of the Committees and for the formal Board meeting are stated separately; however, all agendas shall be considered as a single agenda and any item listed on the agenda of any Committee may be acted upon by the Board. All items on the agenda of any Committee, including information items, may be deliberated and become subject to action by the Board. 2. DOCUMENTS: Staff reports and any other public information provided to the Board or Committee before the meeting relating to items on the agenda are available for public review at the San Diego County Water Authority 4677 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 during normal business hours. Additional documents may be distributed at the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit a Scope of Work Addendum 1 1
    IFB# 10144736 Page 36 of 55 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK ADDENDUM 1 1. Contractor agrees to provide the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Southern Field Division (SFD), Maintenance and Repair of Card Readers and Gates as described herein. Department has the authority to add and remove equipment, and locations as deemed necessary. Any additional requested work will be serviced at the unit’s rates herein. 2. The services shall be performed at: Various Locations within Southern Field Division: a. William E. Warne Power Plant- North end of Pyramid Lake via Smokey Bear Road off Interstate 5, Gorman, California 93243 b. Oso Pumping Plant and Sub-Center - 300th Street West off Hwy 138 Gorman, California 93536 c. Alamo Power Plant -300th Street West off Hwy 138, Gorman, California 93536 d. Vista Del Lago Visitor Center - 35800 Vista Del Lago Road, Gorman, California 92343 e. Castaic- 31849 North Lake Hughes Road, Castaic, California 91384 f. Pearblossom O&M - 34534 116th Street East, Pearblossom, California 93553 g. Devil Canyon Power Plant - 6900 Devil Canyon Road, San Bernardino, California 92407 h. Mojave Siphon Power Plant -16001 Highway 173, Hesperia, California 92345 i. Cedar Springs Sub Center – 16051 State Highway 173, Hesperia, California 92345 j. Greenspot Pumping Station - Greenspot Road, Highland, California 92346 k. Crafton Hills Pump Station - Mill Creek Road, Mentone, California 92359 l. Cherry Valley Pumping Plant - Mill Creek Road, Mentone, California 92359 m. Citrus Pumping Station - 9401 Opal Avenue, Mentone, California 92359 3. Location: Electric Gates and Type a. Castaic Sub Center: arm gate b. Castaic Lagoon seepage pit: slide gate c.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.12 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes the drainage features, stormwater quality, flooding hazards, and flood-protection improvements within the City’s Planning Area. Regulatory agencies governing stormwater quality and flooding hazards are also discussed. The City’s Planning Area is comprised of the City’s boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. With implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, objectives, and policies potential impacts on hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Surface Water Drainage Patterns within City’s Planning Area Surface water drainage patterns are dependent on topography, the amount and location of impervious surfaces, and the type of flood control that is located in an area. The size, or magnitude, of a flood is described by a term called a “recurrence interval.” By studying a long period of flow record for a stream, hydrologists estimate the size of a flood that would have a likelihood of occurring during various intervals. For example, a five-year flood event would occur, on the average, once every five years (and would have a 20 percent chance of occurring in any one year). Although a 100-year flood event is expected to happen only once in a century, there is a 1 percent chance that a flood of that size could happen during any year.
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream of O'neill Forebay
    DSM2DSM2 CaliforniaCalifornia AqueductAqueduct ExtensionExtension Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum March 1, 2005 Introduction and Project Goals • CH2M HILL is constructing a DSM2 model of the California Aqueduct on behalf of DWR’s Municipal Water Quality Investigation (MWQI) program and the State Water Project Contractors • Goals: – Detailed evaluation of Aqueduct Hydrodynamics, Water Quality, and Operations – Forecasting short-term and long-term water quality – Potential for Real-time analysis of Water Quality throughout system Model Coverage and Geometry • The model includes – California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct – East Branch to Silverwood Lake, West Branch to Pyramid Lake, – San Luis Reservoir and O’Neill Forebay, and – DMC from Tracy Pumping Plant to the Mendota Pool – 580 miles in total • EXCEL tool built to generate ASCII cross section files • Pipes and Tunnels treated as channels Model Area Model Schematic Boundary Conditions • Flow at Tracy and Banks • San Luis Reservoir Operations • DMC and O’Neill Forebay Operations • Diversions to South Bay Aqueduct and West Branch (pumping plant data) • Contractor Diversions Database • Mass Balance Closure Terms Application-specific issues • Treatment of Check Structures – gates and weirs to control elevation • Use of Object to Object programming – DSM2 tool that allows for instantaneous transfer of water from location to another • Flow into South Bay Aqueduct • O’Neill Pumping and Generating Flows • Gianelli Pumping and Generating Flows • Flow into South Bay
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Energy Technical Report, DEIS
    Draft Power and Energy Technical Report Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, California Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2013 Contents Contents Chapter 1 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 1-1 Environmental Setting .............................................................................................................. 1-1 Shasta Lake and Vicinity ................................................................................................. 1-7 Upper Sacramento River (Shasta Dam to Red Bluff) ...................................................... 1-9 Lower Sacramento River and Delta ............................................................................... 1-10 CVP/SWP Service Areas ............................................................................................... 1-12 Chapter 2 Modeling Results ................................................................................................ 2-1 Chapter 3 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 3-1 Tables Table 1-1. Central Valley Project Power Plants, Capacities, and Historical Annual Generation ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Table 1-2. Major State Water Project Facilities, Capacities, and Historical Power Generation
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Water Co-Benefits from Covering Canals with Solar Panels B
    Nature Sustainability, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00693-8 Author-formatted copy Energy and water co-benefits from covering canals with solar panels B. McKuina,b*, A. Zumkehra, J. Taa, R. Balesa, J. H. Viersa, T. Pathaka, J. E. Campbell b* a Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of California, Merced b Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz * Corresponding authors: [email protected] and [email protected] Solar-power development over canals is an emerging response to the energy-water-food nexus that can result in multiple benefits for water and energy infrastructure. Case studies of over-canal solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays have demonstrated enhanced PV performance due to the cooler microclimate next to the canal. Further, shade from the PV panels has been shown to mitigate evaporation and could mitigate aquatic weed growth. However, the evaporation savings and financial co-benefits have not been quantified across major canal systems. Here we use regional hydrologic and techno-economic simulations of solar PV panels covering California’s 6350 km canal network, which is the world’s largest conveyance system and covers a wide range of climates, insolation rates, and water costs. We find that over-canal solar could reduce annual evaporation by an average of 39 ± 12 thousand m3 per kilometer of canals. Furthermore, the financial benefits from shading the canals outweigh the added costs of cable-support structures required to span canals. The net present value (NPV) of over-canal solar exceeds conventional over-ground solar by 20% to 50%, challenging the convention of leaving canals uncovered and calling into question our understanding of the most economic locations to locate solar power.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story Behind Your Drinking Water Quality
    German Spanish Korean Chinese Annual Water Quality Report ~ Published June 2009 June Published ~ Report Quality Water Annual In fact, our water was far better than required for most standards most for required than better far was water our fact, In met all drinking water standards for health and safety again this year. year. this again safety and health for standards water drinking all met Aqueduct Las Virgenes Municipal Water District District Water Municipal Virgenes Las California Water Quality Report for 2008 for Report Quality Water Sierra Mtn Snow Mtn Sierra Lake Oroville in northern California northern in Oroville Lake Drinking Water Quality Water Drinking The Story Behind Your Your Behind Story The LVMWD For More Information PRSRT STD Board of Directors US POSTAGE Division 1 LVMWD PAID NO HOLLYWOOD CA Customer Service Charles Caspary PERMIT #8 Phone: (818) 251-2200 President Fax: (818) 251-2109 Division 2 E-mail: [email protected] Glen Peterson Additional information about drinking water safety and Secretary standards can be found at: MWD Representative Division 3 California Department of Public Health EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline Lee Renger Office of Drinking Water (800) 426-4791 Vice President 601 N. 7th St. www.epa.gov/safewater/standards.html Division 4 Sacramento, CA 94234-7320 (Information on how drinking water laws are www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Pages/ established) Joseph M. Bowman default.aspx Board Member U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Centers for Disease Control Division 5 (EPA) and Prevention Jeff Smith Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water 1600 Clifton Road Treasurer 401 M Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30333 Washington, DC 20460 www.cdc.gov General Manager www.epa.gov/safewater/ (800) 311-3435 John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project
    Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 State of California Department of Water Resources November 22, 2019 Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 Lead Agency: California Department of Water Resources Contact: Dean Messer, Division of Environmental Services, Regulatory Compliance Branch 916/376-9844 Responsible Agency: California Department of Fish and Wildlife November 22, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Required Permits and Approvals ......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Document Organization ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ 1-3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles 1:O~1Department of Water & Power Los Angeles
    ~ los Angeles 1:o~1Department of Water & Power Commission ERIC GARCEITI MEL LEVINE, President MARCIE L. EDWARDS Mayor WILLIAM W. FUNDERBURK JR., Vice President General Manager JILL BANKS BARAD MICHAEL F. FLEMING CHRISTINA E. NOONAN BARBARA E. MOSCHOS, Secretary June 5, 2014 The Honorable City Council City of Los Angeles Room 395, City Hall Los Angeles, California 90012 Honorable Members: Subject: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relicensing Process Agreement No. BP 13-062 with the California Department of Water Resources for the State Water Project Hydropower Project No. 2426 Pursuant to Charter Section 674, enclosed for approval by your Honorable Body is Resolution No. 014227, adopted by the Board of Water and Power Commissioners on June 3, 2014, approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney, which authorizes execution of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relicensing Process Agreement No. BP 13-062 with the California Department of Water Resources for the South State Water Project Hydropower Project No. 2426, including Castaic Power Plant, and Amendment No.5 to Contract No. 10099 for Cooperative Development West Branch California Aqueduct. If additional information is required, please contact Ms. Winifred Yancy, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs and Community Relations, at (213) 367-0025. Sincerely, ~~,~ Barbara E. Moschos Board Secretary BEM:oja Enclosures: LADWP Resolution Board Letter CAO Report Ordinance Relicensing Process Agreement between California Department of Water Resources and The Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles for the South SWP Hydropower Project No. 2426 Amendment No.5 Contract No.1 0099 for Cooperative Development West Branch, California Aqueduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does Our Water Come From?
    Have you ever wondered where your water comes from? Here in Huntington Beach, about three-quarters of our water is drawn from local groundwater supplies, while the rest is imported from both Northern California and the Colorado River. Shasta Trinity Lake Water from Northern California travels to us through a complex delivery system Lake known as the California State Water Project. Designed and built in the 1960s, the State Water Project is one of the largest public water and power utilities in the REDDING world, providing drinking water for more than 25 million people statewide. THE Managed by the California Department of Water Resources, the project stretches CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT over 700 miles, from Lake Oroville in the north to Lake Perris in the south. Water Lake stored in Lake Oroville, Folsom Lake, and other tributaries, and fed by snow melt Oroville from the Sierra Mountains, flows into the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, and from there into reservoirs in the Bay-Delta region. Feather River Sacramento From the Bay-Delta, giant pumps lift the water into the 444-mile-long California River Aqueduct, there to flow southward to cities and farms in central and Southern Folsom SACRAMENTO Lake California. Composed mainly of concrete-lined canals, the Aqueduct also includes over 20 miles of tunnels, more than 130 miles of pipelines, New Hogan and 27 miles of siphons. Along the way, the water is pumped Reservoir Managed by the Metropolitan The 2,882 feet over the Tehachapi Mountains. The Edmonston Water District of Southern Bay-Delta Pumping Plant alone lifts millions of gallons a day up California, the Colorado River SAN San 1,926 feet, the highest single water lift in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Regional Urban Water Management Plan
    Greater Tehachapi Area - 2015 Regional Urban Water Management Plan Draft - May 2016 Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District Bear Valley Community Services District City of Tehachapi Golden Hills Community Services District Stallion Springs Community Services District Table of Contents _____________________________________________________________________________________ Section 1 : Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.01 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.02 Report Organization......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.03 Compliance with 2015 Water Use Targets ...................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 Tehachapi Cummings-County Water District ............................................................................ 2-1 2.01 Plan Preparation .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.01.1 Agency Identification .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.01.2 Coordination and Outreach ................................................................................ 2-1 2.02 System Description .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.02.1
    [Show full text]