DOCSLIB.ORG

Castaic Dam Fact Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Castaic Dam Fact Sheet CASTAIC DAM MODERNIZATION CASTAIC DAM, LAKE AND LAGOON are located 45 miles northwest of Los Angeles and provide water for the greater LA area. The dam was built between 1965 and 1974 as part of the CALIFORNIA STATE California Department of Water Resources (DWR) State Water Project (SWP). WATER PROJECT DWR is modernizing its SWP facilities across the state, including Castaic Dam. This consists of Begun in earnest in the identifying and proactively addressing any issues that could impact the delivery of water or the safety of 1950s, the California surrounding communities. In Fall of 2019, DWR initiated field work for the Castaic Dam Modernization State Water Project (SWP) is a water storage Program. Over the next several years, DWR will conduct assessments of the dam and associated and delivery system that structures, and undertake construction activities to ensure the dam continues to function safely. supplies water to more than 27 million people and provides irrigation Based on DSOD findings and DWR’s Status of Castaic Dam for about 750,000 acres inspections, the initial focus of the Castaic In its most recent inspection, the California of farmland. The SWP Dam modernization effort will be to explore the spans two-thirds of the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) rated conditions of the spillway, left abutment (where length of California and Castaic Dam as fair – meaning there are no the dam meets the valley wall), water supply includes 26 dams and existing dam safety deficiencies that will impact outlet structures, and the tower access bridge reservoirs; 705 miles of the dam’s functions under normal conditions. canals, tunnels, and to the water outlets. However, improvements can be made to pipelines; and nine prevent serious impacts after either an extreme hydroelectric power plants. In addition to weather or earthquake event. Spillway Condition and Extreme water supply, the SWP Weather Assessments provides many benefits, n Over the years, DWR has carefully and including flood control, power generation, consistently managed the reservoir’s recreation, and fish and water levels so as to not use the spillway. wildlife habitat. However, changes in weather patterns introduce new uncertainties for future The SWP collects rainfall extreme weather events. Climate models and snowmelt runoff, show that increased temperatures in transports the water California will result in more precipitation through the California Aqueduct, and stores falling as rain rather than snow, which water in one of the will alter river flows throughout the state. many storage facilities DWR wants to ensure that the spillway will like Castaic Lake. The function appropriately if it is activated to SWP works as a system release water in the future. to manage water supply throughout the n Dam safety engineers have identified that SWP, which can vary some of the concrete wall and floor panels both seasonally and in the spillway have shifted, which could from year to year. lead to erosion if the spillway were used SWP water travels to 29 water contracting to release water. DWR is investigating the agencies that deliver causes and impacts to target rehabilitation the water to their work and ensure the spillway will work customers. appropriately if a need ever arises. Earthquake Resiliency Assessments What to Expect? n DWR conducted a stability analysis in n During the modernization process, as 2018, which indicated the dam structure a cautionary measure, DWR lowers will continue to perform safely, even in the the water level of Castaic Lake slightly event of a major earthquake. during the winter months to provide more capacity in the reservoir to buffer winter n However, other studies indicate that the run-off, reducing the likelihood that the outlet structures (the large towers that spillway would need to be employed. allow DWR to release water from the Additionally, temporarily reduced water reservoir) are vulnerable to collapse in a levels may be necessary to conduct major earthquake. While this would not various repair efforts of the outlet towers cause the dam to fail, it would significantly and access bridge. These slightly lower reduce DWR’s ability to release water water levels will not impact water supply. reliably resulting in potential impacts to DWR is working closely with its state water deliveries. partners and local organizations to n DWR is currently conducting seismic minimize the extent of recreation impacts. retrofits of the access bridge to the outlet n structures to ensure that personnel can DWR will be operating construction access the outlet structures should an equipment in all phases of the earthquake occur. modernization program. Some localized noise and increased activity may be expected, particularly during rehabilitation construction efforts. n DWR anticipates that the modernization efforts of the Program will take about 10 years to complete. How to Contact Us For more information on the Castaic Dam Modernization Program, contact: [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exhibit a Scope of Work Addendum 1 1
    IFB# 10144736 Page 36 of 55 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK ADDENDUM 1 1. Contractor agrees to provide the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Southern Field Division (SFD), Maintenance and Repair of Card Readers and Gates as described herein. Department has the authority to add and remove equipment, and locations as deemed necessary. Any additional requested work will be serviced at the unit’s rates herein. 2. The services shall be performed at: Various Locations within Southern Field Division: a. William E. Warne Power Plant- North end of Pyramid Lake via Smokey Bear Road off Interstate 5, Gorman, California 93243 b. Oso Pumping Plant and Sub-Center - 300th Street West off Hwy 138 Gorman, California 93536 c. Alamo Power Plant -300th Street West off Hwy 138, Gorman, California 93536 d. Vista Del Lago Visitor Center - 35800 Vista Del Lago Road, Gorman, California 92343 e. Castaic- 31849 North Lake Hughes Road, Castaic, California 91384 f. Pearblossom O&M - 34534 116th Street East, Pearblossom, California 93553 g. Devil Canyon Power Plant - 6900 Devil Canyon Road, San Bernardino, California 92407 h. Mojave Siphon Power Plant -16001 Highway 173, Hesperia, California 92345 i. Cedar Springs Sub Center – 16051 State Highway 173, Hesperia, California 92345 j. Greenspot Pumping Station - Greenspot Road, Highland, California 92346 k. Crafton Hills Pump Station - Mill Creek Road, Mentone, California 92359 l. Cherry Valley Pumping Plant - Mill Creek Road, Mentone, California 92359 m. Citrus Pumping Station - 9401 Opal Avenue, Mentone, California 92359 3. Location: Electric Gates and Type a. Castaic Sub Center: arm gate b. Castaic Lagoon seepage pit: slide gate c.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.12 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes the drainage features, stormwater quality, flooding hazards, and flood-protection improvements within the City’s Planning Area. Regulatory agencies governing stormwater quality and flooding hazards are also discussed. The City’s Planning Area is comprised of the City’s boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. With implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, objectives, and policies potential impacts on hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Surface Water Drainage Patterns within City’s Planning Area Surface water drainage patterns are dependent on topography, the amount and location of impervious surfaces, and the type of flood control that is located in an area. The size, or magnitude, of a flood is described by a term called a “recurrence interval.” By studying a long period of flow record for a stream, hydrologists estimate the size of a flood that would have a likelihood of occurring during various intervals. For example, a five-year flood event would occur, on the average, once every five years (and would have a 20 percent chance of occurring in any one year). Although a 100-year flood event is expected to happen only once in a century, there is a 1 percent chance that a flood of that size could happen during any year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story Behind Your Drinking Water Quality
    German Spanish Korean Chinese Annual Water Quality Report ~ Published June 2009 June Published ~ Report Quality Water Annual In fact, our water was far better than required for most standards most for required than better far was water our fact, In met all drinking water standards for health and safety again this year. year. this again safety and health for standards water drinking all met Aqueduct Las Virgenes Municipal Water District District Water Municipal Virgenes Las California Water Quality Report for 2008 for Report Quality Water Sierra Mtn Snow Mtn Sierra Lake Oroville in northern California northern in Oroville Lake Drinking Water Quality Water Drinking The Story Behind Your Your Behind Story The LVMWD For More Information PRSRT STD Board of Directors US POSTAGE Division 1 LVMWD PAID NO HOLLYWOOD CA Customer Service Charles Caspary PERMIT #8 Phone: (818) 251-2200 President Fax: (818) 251-2109 Division 2 E-mail: [email protected] Glen Peterson Additional information about drinking water safety and Secretary standards can be found at: MWD Representative Division 3 California Department of Public Health EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline Lee Renger Office of Drinking Water (800) 426-4791 Vice President 601 N. 7th St. www.epa.gov/safewater/standards.html Division 4 Sacramento, CA 94234-7320 (Information on how drinking water laws are www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Pages/ established) Joseph M. Bowman default.aspx Board Member U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Centers for Disease Control Division 5 (EPA) and Prevention Jeff Smith Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water 1600 Clifton Road Treasurer 401 M Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30333 Washington, DC 20460 www.cdc.gov General Manager www.epa.gov/safewater/ (800) 311-3435 John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles 1:O~1Department of Water & Power Los Angeles
    ~ los Angeles 1:o~1Department of Water & Power Commission ERIC GARCEITI MEL LEVINE, President MARCIE L. EDWARDS Mayor WILLIAM W. FUNDERBURK JR., Vice President General Manager JILL BANKS BARAD MICHAEL F. FLEMING CHRISTINA E. NOONAN BARBARA E. MOSCHOS, Secretary June 5, 2014 The Honorable City Council City of Los Angeles Room 395, City Hall Los Angeles, California 90012 Honorable Members: Subject: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relicensing Process Agreement No. BP 13-062 with the California Department of Water Resources for the State Water Project Hydropower Project No. 2426 Pursuant to Charter Section 674, enclosed for approval by your Honorable Body is Resolution No. 014227, adopted by the Board of Water and Power Commissioners on June 3, 2014, approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney, which authorizes execution of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relicensing Process Agreement No. BP 13-062 with the California Department of Water Resources for the South State Water Project Hydropower Project No. 2426, including Castaic Power Plant, and Amendment No.5 to Contract No. 10099 for Cooperative Development West Branch California Aqueduct. If additional information is required, please contact Ms. Winifred Yancy, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs and Community Relations, at (213) 367-0025. Sincerely, ~~,~ Barbara E. Moschos Board Secretary BEM:oja Enclosures: LADWP Resolution Board Letter CAO Report Ordinance Relicensing Process Agreement between California Department of Water Resources and The Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles for the South SWP Hydropower Project No. 2426 Amendment No.5 Contract No.1 0099 for Cooperative Development West Branch, California Aqueduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Intent for Castaic Dam High Intake Tower Bridge Retrofit
    California Department of Water Resources NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION To: All Interested Parties From: California Department of Water Resources Jeanne Kuttel 1416 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Castaic Dam High Intake Tower Bridge Retrofit LEAD AGENCY: California Department of Water Resources PROJECT AREA: Castaic Lake State Recreation Area PROJECT TYPE: High Intake Tower Bridge Retrofit NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is the Lead Agency and has prepared an Initial Study (IS) with the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Castaic Dam High Intake Tower Bridge Retrofit Project (project). PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed project is located at Castaic Lake approximately 40 miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles within the Sierra Pelona Mountains, north of Santa Clarita along Interstate 5. The project site is located at 34 degrees north latitude, 118 degrees west longitude, in Township 05N, Range 17W, Sections 12 and 13. The Castaic Dam high intake tower and bridge are located within the southwestern portion of the lake on Castaic Dam’s right abutment. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DWR is proposing to implement the project to seismically retrofit the tower bridge at Castaic Lake, the terminal reservoir of the State Water Project’s West Branch located within the Castaic Lake State Recreation Area. Construction would occur at the tower bridge, high tower abutment, Piers 2 through 4, and Abutment 5. The tower bridge retrofit would include installing restrainer cables to transfer longitudinal seismic forces to the adjacent spans or frames and the piers would be jacketed with carbon fiber reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • California Water Supply Infrastructure
    California Water Supply Infrastructure Natural: rivers, snowpack, aquifers Aqueducts, canals, pipelines, pumping plants Surface storage (dams, reservoirs) Groundwater extraction and recharge Urban: treatment, storm water capture, desalination California Aqueduct (DWR) Geographical Features Coastal Range Sacramento River Valley Delta San Joaquin River Valley San Francisco Tulare Basin area Kern County Colorado Los Angeles area River . http://www.california-map.org Imperial County 2 Water Accounting in California Average Usage Agriculture: 33 MAF Urban: 9 MAF Some sources of supply State Water Project: 3 MAF Federal Water Project: 8 MAF Colorado River: 5 MAF Ground water: 15 MAF Other from local projects and reuse 3 Water Supply Example: Irvine Ranch Water District 380,000 residents Water Sources for IRWD Local streams Recycling (non-potable) Imported by MWD Local groundwater pumping (OCWD) Remote groundwater banking Desalination (future) Role of Infrastructure in Water Transfers river or aqueduct Major California Water Projects Federal, State and local (California Water Plan: Update 2013) Shasta Dam and lake (Anthony Dunn) Red Bluff Diversion Dam (Red Bluff Daily News) Oroville Dam and lake (California DWR) Sacramento River (placesonline.com) Delta scene (DWR) Left: Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta (Wikipedia) Lower left: Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant (baydeltalive.com) Lower right: Federal and State Aqueducts (Wikipedia) Friant Dam and Millerton lake (USBR) San Luis Reservoir (California DWR) San Joaquin River (www.alamy.com) Edmonston Pumping
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the Central
    Chapter 10: Terrestrial Biological Resources Chapter 10 1 Terrestrial Biological Resources 2 10.1 Introduction 3 This chapter describes terrestrial biological resources in the Study Area; and 4 potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the alternatives 5 evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Implementation of the 6 alternatives could affect terrestrial biological resources through potential changes 7 in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project (SWP) 8 and ecosystem restoration. 9 10.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 10 Requirements 11 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 12 this EIS could affect terrestrial biological resources in areas: along the shorelines 13 and in the waters of reservoirs that store CVP and SWP water supplies, along 14 rivers and waterways (including bypasses) impacted by changes in the operations 15 of CVP or SWP reservoirs, within agricultural areas served by CVP and SWP 16 water supplies, and modified to provide wetland habitat. Actions located on 17 public agency lands; or implemented, funded, or approved by Federal and state 18 agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal and state agency 19 policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach to 20 Environmental Analyses. 21 10.3 Affected Environment 22 This section describes terrestrial biological resources that could potentially be 23 affected by implementing the alternatives considered in this EIS. Changes in 24 terrestrial biological resources due to changes in CVP and SWP operations may 25 occur in the Trinity River, Central Valley, San Francisco Bay Area, Central Coast, 26 and Southern California regions.
    [Show full text]
  • PB 297571 the John A
    PB 297571 The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Department of Civil Engineering Stanford University SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR CALIFORNIA STATE WATER PROJECT Reach C by Haresh C. Shah Manoutchehr Movassate Theodore C. Zsutty This research was partially supported by the Department of Water Resources, State of California Grant DWR 8-51478 and by the National Science Foundation Grant GI-39122 Report No. 22 March 1976 50272 -101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION T1:-REPORT NO. I- PAGE I NSF!:_RA-=76~~~2_~_ 4. Title and Subtitle Seismic Risk Analysis for California State Water Project, Reach C 6. ------------- .. - -------------------------1 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. H.C. Shah, M. Movassate, T.C. Zsutty 22 ----- - -----------------~ 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. --. --. -------------- Center II. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No. (C) (G) GI39122 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and A-dd-r·e-s-s------------------ ---------- ---------------------1 13. Type of Report & Period Covered Engineering and Applied Science (EAS) National Science Foundation ------------------_ .. ------- 1800 G Street, N.W. 14. Washington, DoC. 20550 r-1~5-.-=-su-p-p'-em"""e'-Cnt-'-ary-'-'--'-N-ot=--es-=--=-':""""'--=:"::"'::"'=""--- .-------.--------------~ --------------------1 Partially supported by the Department of Water Resources, State of California, Grant DWR B-51478 1-------------------- ---------------- 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) A seismic hazard map for the region described as "Reach C" for the California Water Project is developed in this report. "Reach C" for this work is defined as that por­ tion of the California Water Project from Tehachapi Afterbay up to and including the Perris Dam and Lake. The key facilities within this reach include: (1) Tehachapi Afterbay, (2) Cottonwood Power Plant Site, (3) Pearblossom Pumping Plant, (4) Mojave Siphon, (5) Silverwood Dam and Lake, (6) San Bernardino Tunnel, (7) Devil Canyon Power Plant, (8) Santa Ana Valley Pipeline, (9) Perris Dam and Lake, and (10) Perris 0 &M Subcenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Grand Jury 2017 - 2018
    Ventura County Grand Jury 2017 - 2018 Final Report Ventura County Dam Safety May 10, 2018 This page intentionally blank Ventura County 2017 – 2018 Grand Jury Final Report Ventura County Dam Safety Summary In light of the 2017 failure of the spillway at Oroville Dam, the 2017-2018 Ventura County Grand Jury (Grand Jury) investigated the condition of more than 20 dams in or adjoining Ventura County. The Grand Jury found that 14 of these dams could cause significant loss of life and property if they failed. Four of these dams, all under the jurisdiction of the State of California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), are identified as having existing or potential deficiencies. The Grand Jury investigated the reasons for the deficiencies and what efforts are being made to correct them. The Grand Jury also reviewed how a dam failure would be handled by the County of Ventura (County). The Grand Jury concluded that dam disaster response plans follow State of California (State) guidance. However, these plans provide little or no guidance beyond the process of notifying dam management and the Ventura County Office of Emergency Services (OES). The Grand Jury concluded that there does not appear to be any effort by the dam owners or the OES to educate the public as to the potential inundation areas, evacuation routes, or what to do in the event of a dam failure. The Grand Jury recommends that the OES consider working with dam owners and cities to develop and widely distribute dam failure inundation maps and other information to assist residents in planning for dam failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil-Cement Guide for Water Resources Applications
    Soil-Cement Guide for Water Resources Applications Dennis L. Richards and Hans R. Hadley, WEST Consultants, Inc. WHITE BELOW Soil-Cement Guide for Water Resources Applications By Dennis L. Richards and Hans R. Hadley, WEST Consultants, Inc. Portland Cement Association 5420 Old Orchard Road Skokie, Illinois 60077-1083 847.966.6200 Fax 847.966.9781 www.cement.org An organization of cement companies to improve and extend the uses of portland cement and concrete through market development, engineering, research, education, and public affairs work. Abstract: For more than 50 years, soil-cement has proven to be effective and economical construction material for use in water resources applications including streambank protection, slope protection, channel and pond linings, and grade control structures. Materials for soil-cement, mix proportioning, design, construction, and quality control topics are discussed. Keywords: Soil-cement, streambank protection, erosion control, grade control structures, levee protection, slope protection, channel lining, upstream slope protection. Reference: Richards, Dennis L., Hadley, Hans R., Soil-Cement Guide for Water Resources Applications, EB203.01, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 84 pages. About the Authors: Dennis L. Richards, Senior Project Manager, WEST Consultants, Inc., 960 West Elliot Road, Suite 201, Tempe, Arizona 85284-1137. Hans R. Hadley, Hydraulic Engineer, WEST Consultants, Inc., 2601 25th Street Southeast, Suite 450, Salem, Oregon 97302. Cover photo credits: Portland Cement Association (“PCA”) is a not-for-profit Top: Soil-cement upstream slope organization and provides this publication solely for the protection at Jackson Lake, Colorado. continuing education of qualified professionals. THIS Middle: Soil-cement bank protection PUBLICATION SHOULD ONLY BE USED BY QUALIFIED at Rillito River, Tucson, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Existing Information Sources
    Appendix A Existing Information Sources This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Pre-Application Document South SWP Hydropower Relicensing, FERC Project No. 2426 APPENDIX A EXISTING INFORMATION SOURCES Adams, M.J, Pearl C.A, and Bury R.B. 2003. Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecology Letters 6:1–9 Adhya, Ron. 2008. Pyramid Lake Vista Del Lago Visitor Center Inclinometer Monitoring. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. San Francisco. Aedo, John. 2014. Environmental Inspection Report for 2426 Project, September 9-13, 2013. FERC San Francisco Region. September 5, 2014. Aedo, J. R. 2011. Letter to Henry Ramirez acknowledging receipt of 2010 arroyo toad monitoring report. FERC. April 21, 2011 Ainsworth, G. 2011a. Email to Chris Dellith regarding implementation of change in arroyo toad survey frequency. ESA. May 31, 2011 Ainsworth, G. 2011b. Email to Dan Peterson regarding 2011 arroyo toad monitoring scope. ESA. February 14, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011c. Email to James Gleim and Dan Peterson regarding arroyo toad survey timing. ESA. May 18, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011d. Email to James Gleim regarding arroyo toad surveys. ESA. May 10, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011e. Email to James Gleim regarding implementation of change in arroyo toad survey frequency. ESA. May 27, 2011 Ainsworth, G. 2011f. Email to James Gleim with update on survey results. ESA. June 30, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011g. Emails with Greg Ainsworth regarding providing monitoring report to Samuel Sweet. ESA. January 11, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011h. Emails with Greg Ainsworth regarding providing monitoring report to Samuwl Sweet. ESA. January 10, 2011. Ainsworth, G. 2011i. Letter to Terry Becker regarding 2011 arroyo toad monitoring scope.
    [Show full text]