DOCSLIB.ORG

Lindblad-Toh Et Al. Figure S1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lindblad-Toh Et Al. Figure S1 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S1 1,600,000 Mixed inconsistencies Linking inconsistencies Illogical links 1,400,000 Missing read partners Negative gap Haplotype inconsistency 1,200,000 1,000,000 ) p b ( y r 800,000 o t i r r e T 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 X Chromosome Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S2 Chr 1 Chr 21 Chr 2 Chr 22 Chr 3 Chr 23 Chr 4 Chr 24 Chr 5 Chr 25 Chr 6 Chr 26 Chr 7 Chr 27 Chr 8 Chr 28 Chr 9 Chr 29 Chr 10 Chr 30 Chr 11 Chr 31 Chr 12 Chr 32 Chr 13 Chr 33 Chr 14 Chr 34 Chr 15 Chr 35 Chr 16 Chr 36 Chr 17 Chr 37 Chr 18 Chr 38 Chr 19 1 7 13 19 Chr 20 2 8 14 20 3 9 15 21 4 10 16 22 Chr X 5 11 17 X 6 12 18 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S3 Dog chr 1 Dog chr 2 Dog chr 3 Dog chr 4 Dog chr 5 Dog chr 6 Dog chr 7 Dog chr 8 Dog chr 9 Dog chr 10 Dog chr 11 Dog chr 12 Dog chr 13 Dog chr 14 Dog chr 15 Dog chr 16 Dog chr 21 Dog chr 22 Dog chr 23 Dog chr 24 Dog chr 29 Dog chr 30 Dog chr 31 Dog chr 32 Dog chr 37 Dog chr 38 Dog chr X Dog chr unknown Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S4 700 Human syntenic segments Human syntenic blocks Mouse syntenic segments 600 Mouse syntenic blocks Rat syntenic segments s Rat syntenic blocks t n e m 500 g e s r o s k c 400 o l b f o r e b 300 m u N 200 100 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Minimum size (kb) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S5 All breaks 1000 kb Interchromosomal breaks 59 55 Dog Dog 38 25 Human Human 18 11 Mouse Mouse 98 93 Rodent Rodent 18 15 Rat Rat 500 kb 81 74 Dog Dog 61 42 Human Human 26 18 Mouse Mouse 108 106 Rodent Rodent 31 21 Rat Rat 300 kb 98 78 Dog Dog 93 49 Human Human 36 19 Mouse Mouse 126 123 Rodent Rodent 58 26 Rat Rat 100 kb 109 97 Dog Dog 136 66 Human Human 54 34 Mouse Mouse 131 150 Rodent Rodent 172 38 Rat Rat Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S6 0.08 Dog Human 0.07 Mouse 0.06 s w 0.05 o d n i w f 0.04 o n o i t c a 0.03 r F 0.02 0.01 0 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 (G+C) content (%) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S7 a b 0.28 0.55 0.26 0.50 ) R 0.24 A ( n o i e t t c a r 0.22 a r f e 0.45 c ) n C e 0.20 + g r G ( e v i D 0.18 0.40 0.16 0.35 0.14 All Internal Sub- All Internal Sub- breaks telomere breaks telomere Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S8 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 n 0.6 o i t Fraction of selected windows c 0.5 a in clusters (estimated) r F 0.4 Fraction of all windows in clusters 0.3 Fraction of selected 0.2 sequence considered 0.1 Fraction of background sequence considered 0 –5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Conservation score Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S10 a Total human bases b Total HCNE bases c HCNE density 300,000 3500 0.009 0.008 250,000 3000 0.007 2500 200,000 0.006 2000 0.005 150,000 1500 0.004 100,000 0.003 1000 0.002 50,000 500 0.001 0 0 0 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 Gene neighborhood Gene neighborhood Gene neighborhood Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S11 20 20 15 15 10 10 ) ) z z ( ( s 5 s 5 K K / / a a K K 0 0 n e a s u m –5 –5 o u M H –10 –10 –15 –15 –20 –20 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 10 15 20 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 10 15 20 Dog Ka/Ks (z) Dog Ka/Ks (z) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S12 a Acceleration score (human vs. mouse) b Acceleration score (dog vs. mouse) c Acceleration score (human vs. dog) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S13 0.8 Chr 1 Chr 4 Chr 6 0.7 Chr 8 Chr 10 Chr 12 Chr 14 0.6 Chr 22 Chr 23 Chr 24 0.5 2 r e g a 0.4 r e v A 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 Distance (bp) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S14 0.8 Observed data Model (F = 12%) 0.7 Model (F = 30%) Model (F = 50%) 0.6 0.5 2 r e g a r 0.4 e v A 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 Distance (bp) Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S15 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S16 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S17 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S18 a 8 ) 7 % 3 > ( 6 s e p y t o 5 l p a h f 4 o r e b m 3 u n e g 2 a r e v A 1 0 Across All within Bullmastiff English Irish Pug Rottweiler breed breed springer wolfhound set dogs spaniel b 12 ) 10 % 3 > ( s e p 8 y t o l p a h f 6 o r e b m u n 4 e g a r e v A 2 0 Across All within Akita Basenji Bullmastiff English Glen of Irish Pug Rottweiler breed breed springer Imaal wolfhound set dogs spaniel terrier Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S19 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S20 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S21 Glen of English Labrador Irish Golden Imaal springer Rottweiler Pug retriever wolfhound retriever terrier spaniel Bullmastiff Basenji Akita Akita 0.29 0.19 0.35 0.27 0.40 0.20 0.42 0.52 0.50 0.73 Basenji 0.70 0.59 0.69 0.64 0.85 0.52 0.64 0.74 0.95 Bullmastiff 0.32 0.22 0.32 0.28 0.67 0.19 0.45 0.92 English springer spaniel 0.54 0.42 0.44 0.40 0.63 0.35 0.75 Glen of Imaal terrier 0.65 0.66 0.71 0.83 0.45 0.69 Golden retriever 0.66 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.80 Irish wolfhound 0.71 0.70 0.78 0.86 Labrador retriever 0.68 0.62 0.79 Pug 0.79 0.78 Rottweiler 0.77 Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S22 a b c 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 ) 0.7 ) 0.7 ) 0.7 % % % ( ( ( 30,000 n n n o 0.6 o 0.6 o 0.6 15,000 i i i t t t c c c 7,500 a a a r r r f f f 0.5 0.5 0.5 e e e v v v i i i t t t a a a l 0.4 l 0.4 l 0.4 u u u m m m u 0.3 u 0.3 u 0.3 C C C 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 5 10 15 20 Log likelihood ratio Log likelihood ratio Log likelihood ratio Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S23 97 Arctic fox 100 Kit fox Corsac fox 66 62 Ruppell's fox Red fox 100 Blanford's fox 76 Fennec fox Cape fox 52 Raccoon dog Bat-eared fox Short-eared dog Crab-eating fox 100 60 Culpeo 77 Sechuran fox 65 Darwin's fox 97 Chilla Pampas fox Hoary fox 82 Maned wolf 100 Bush dog 73 Side-striped jackal 100 Black-backed jackal Golden jackal 100 61 74 Dog 55 Gray Wolf 85 Coyote Ethiopian wolf Dhole African wild dog 100 Gray fox Island fox 100 Black bear Giant panda 100 Elephant seal Walrus Lindblad-Toh et al. Figure S24 100 Arctic fox 52 Kit fox 99 79 Ruppell's fox Red fox 76 Corsac fox 100 Cape fox 71 Blanford's fox 67 Fennec fox 55 Raccoon dog Bat-eared fox Short-eared dog 91 Crab-eating fox 50 Culpeo 68 57 Darwin's fox Chilla 99 94 Pampas fox Sechuran fox Hoary fox 100 96 Maned wolf 100 Bush dog 100 Side-striped jackal Black-backed jackal Golden jackal Dog 68 78 98 Gray Wolf Coyote Ethiopian wolf Dhole African wild dog 100 Gray fox Island fox 100 Black bear Giant panda 100 Elephant seal Walrus Lindblad-Toh et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Home Range and Spatial Organization by the Hoary Fox Lycalopex Vetulus (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae): Response to Social Disruption of Two Neighboring Pairs
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use of artcles in any medium, reproducton, and distributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Home range and spatial organization by the Hoary Fox Lycalopex vetulus (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae): response to social disruption of two neighboring pairs Julio C. Dalponte, Herson S. Lima, Stuart Klorfne & Nelton C. da Luz 26 May 2018 | Vol. 10 | No. 6 | Pages: 11703–11709 10.11609/jot.3082.10.6.11703-11709 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies and Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints contact <[email protected]> Publisher & Host Partners Member Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 May 2018 | 10(6): 11703–11709 Home range and spatial organization by the Hoary Fox Lycalopex vetulus (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae): response Communication to social disruption of two neighboring pairs ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Julio C. Dalponte 1, Herson S. Lima 2, Stuart Klorfne 3 & Nelton C.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Carnívoros 2019 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros 2019 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20192): Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga"/wp#content/up"oads/achave_osnomes!a"egosdos$carnivoros$2019.pd% Fotografía: lince euroasiático (Lynx lynx ). Autor: Jordi Bas. &sta o'ra est( su)eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a'erto* con reco+ecemento da autor,a e sen o'ra derivada nin usos comerciais. -esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/deed.!". Licenza comp"eta: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/"e!a"code0"an!ua!es. 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións galegas para diferentes especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Primeira edición (2018): En total! ac"éganse nomes para 2#$ especies! %&ue son practicamente todos os carnívoros &ue "ai no mundo! salvante os nomes das focas% e $0 subespecies. Os nomes galegos das focas expóñense noutro recurso léxico da +"ave dedicado só aos nomes das focas! manatís e dugongos. ,egunda edición (201-): +orríxese algunha gralla! reescrí'ense as notas introdutorias e incorpórase o logo da +"ave ao deseño do documento. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase a clasificación taxonómica das familias de mamíferos carnívoros! onde se apunta! de maneira xeral! os nomes dos carnívoros &ue "ai en cada familia. seguir vén o corpo do documento! unha listaxe onde se indica! especie por especie, alén do nome científico! os nomes galegos e ingleses dos diferentes mamíferos carnívoros (nalgún caso! tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles ou o nome particular dalgunhas subespecies).
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Parental Care in a Myrmecophageous Mammal
    Innovative parental care in a myrmecophageous mammal Le Roux, A.1*, Beishuizen, R. 2, Brekelmans, W. 2, Ganswindt, A. 3,4, Paris, M. 2,5,6, Dalerum, F. 4,7 1 Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Qwaqwa, Private Bag X13, Phuthaditjhaba 9866, South Africa 2 Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584CM, The Netherlands 3 Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa 4 Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Private Bag x028, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa 5 Institute for Breeding Rare and Endangered Mammals, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 6 School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 7 Centre for Wildlife Management, Hatfield Experimental Farm, Private Bag X028, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa * Corresponding author: email: [email protected]; Phone: +27 58 718 5327; Fax: +27 58 718 5034. Abstract Male bat-eared foxes, Otocyon megalotis, are known to contribute extensively to parental care. Yet, the exact roles that males and females play in raising offspring remain relatively unexplored. Here, we describe interactions between adult foxes and their presumed offspring based on a pilot study on 3 family groups of a wild population in South Africa. We report the first recorded instance of dung provisioning 1 observed in canids. A male bat-eared fox provided dung to his offspring during a foraging trip, presumably to give them access to the ensconced insects. Further, this male provisioned the young foxes with large, live insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Abdominal Aorta in the Hoary Fox (Lycalopex Vetulus, Lund, 1842)
    1 Anatomy of the abdominal aorta in the hoary fox (Lycalopex vetulus, Lund, 1842) Anatomia da aorta abdominal em raposa-do-campo (Lycalopex vetulus, Lund, 1842) Dara Rúbia Souza SILVA1; Mônica Duarte da SILVA1; Marcos Paulo Batista de ASSUNÇÃO1; Eduardo Paul CHACUR1; Daniela Cristina de Oliveira SILVA2; Roseâmely Angélica de Carvalho BARROS1; Zenon SILVA1 1 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Regional Catalão, Instituto de Biotecnologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Catalão – GO, Brazil 2 Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Anatomia Humana, Uberlândia – MG, Brazil Abstract The hoary fox (Lycalopex vetulus, Lund, 1842) is the smallest Brazilian canid, whose weight varies between 2 and 4 kg, has a slender body, a small head, and a short and blackened snout. Despite being considered an endemic species, little is known about the hoary fox as it is one of the seven less studied canids in the world. Thus, this study aimed to describe the anatomy of the abdominal aorta artery of the hoary fox and to compare it with the pre-established literature data in domestic canids. For this purpose, we used two adult hoary foxes without definite age. We collected the corpses of these animals along roadsides of Catalão-GO, being later fixed and conserved in a 10% formalin solution. The results showed that the abdominal aorta in hoary fox is at the ventral face of the lumbar region vertebral bodies, being slightly displaced to the left of the median plane. The first branch is visceral, named celiac artery, followed by a paired parietal branch: the phrenic abdominal arteries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Direct Observational Method and Possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an Invitation for the Rescue of a Classical Method Spread Over the Primatology
    ZOOLOGIA 26 (4): 587–593, December, 2009 OPINION The direct observational method and possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an invitation for the rescue of a classical method spread over the Primatology Primates and carnivores belong to phylogenetically dis- the Palaeotropic and Nearctic regions, and studies using direct tant mammal orders (MURPHY et al. 2001). Overall, carnivores observation in the Neotropical region are very rare, in spite of have developed some very particular and conservative charac- the existing possibilities. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that teristics during the process of evolution, whereas primates have the behavior, socioecology, and certain other aspects of the held to a more plesiomorphic bauplan that emphasizes adapt- biology of carnivores are poorly understood. The aim of the ability over adaptation (SIMPSON 1980). Such differences in the present study is therefore to address this gap in the Neotropics. history of each group have resulted in remarkable anatomical, The advantage of primates and the problem of ecological, and behavioral differences. carnivores in the Neotropics The most commonly studied interactions between pri- It has been possible to study the ecology and behavior of mates and carnivores are between predator and prey (e.g., TREVES primates by following and observing them directly in several 1999, ZUBERBÜHLER & JENNY 2002). While some interactions are locations in South and Central America, because they are con- of a competitive nature (e.g., ROSE et al. 2003, TREVES & PALMQVIST spicuous, and also because of their daily habits and the rela- 2007), mutual interactions are rare (e.g., SCHLEIDT & SHALTER 2003, tive ease with which they become habituated to the observer HAUGAASEN & PERES 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report Conservation Science 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
    2012 Annual Report conservation science 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 BACK FROM THE BRINK Blue Iguanas 8 SCIENCE SAVES SPECIES 10 FIELD CONSERVATION PROJECTS — International 13 RESTORING A FRESHWATER NATIVE Southern Appalachian Brook Trout 15 FIELD CONSERVATION PROJECTS — United States 56 A DISEASE-FREE FUTURE FOR ETHIOPIAN WOLVES A Wolf Vaccine in Sheep’s Clothing 58 JAVAN WARTY PIG Conservation and Recovery Cover Photo: Attwater’s Prairie Chicken © Stephanie Adams, Houston Zoo INTRODUCTION The 2012 Annual Report on Conservation Science Zoos and aquariums accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) serve as conservation centers that are concerned about ecosystem health, take responsibility for species survival, contribute to research, conservation, and education, and provide communities the opportunity to develop personal connections with the animals in their care. Whether breeding and reintroducing endangered species; rescuing, rehabilitating, and releasing sick and injured animals; maintaining far-reaching educational and outreach programs; or supporting and conducting in-situ and ex-situ research and field conservation projects, accredited zoos and aquariums play a vital role in maintaining our planet’s diverse wildlife and natural habitats while engaging the public to appreciate and participate in conservation. The 2012 Annual Report on Conservation Science (ARCS) focuses exclusively on those conservation projects that have a direct impact on animals in the wild. The report is based on survey data submitted by 179 of AZA’s 223 accredited zoos and aquariums and 15 certified- related facilities. Each of the more than 2,700 project submissions listed in this report were reviewed by at least one member of AZA’s Field Conservation Committee (FCC) to ensure that the project met the criteria of having a direct impact on animals in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Parasites of Domestic and Wild Canids in the Region of Serra Do Cipó National Park, Brazil
    Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária ISSN: 0103-846X [email protected] Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Brasil Costa Santos, Juliana Lúcia; Borges Magalhães, Noele; Andrade dos Santos, Hudson; Rio Ribeiro, Raul; Pezzi Guimarães, Marcos Parasites of domestic and wild canids in the region of Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, vol. 21, núm. 3, julio-septiembre, 2012, pp. 270-277 Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Jaboticabal, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=397841485015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Full Article Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet., Jaboticabal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 270-277, jul.-set. 2012 ISSN 0103-846X (impresso) / ISSN 1984-2961 (eletrônico) Parasites of domestic and wild canids in the region of Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil Parasitos de canídeos domésticos e silvestres na região do Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó – Brasil Juliana Lúcia Costa Santos1,2*; Noele Borges Magalhães1; Hudson Andrade dos Santos1,3; Raul Rio Ribeiro4,5; Marcos Pezzi Guimarães1 1Laboratório de Helmintologia Veterinária, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil 2Superintendencia de Pesquisa,
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Human Threats to Three Canid Species of the Brazilian Cerrado
    EVALUATING HUMAN THREATS TO THREE CANID SPECIES OF THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO by Stacie M. Bickley A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Environmental Science and Public Policy Committee: ____________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Freeman, Dissertation Director ____________________________________________ Dr. Nucharin Songsasen, Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dr. Larry Rockwood, Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dr. Michael Gilmore, Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dr. Albert Torzilli, Graduate Program Director ____________________________________________ Dr. A. Alonso Aguirre, Department Chairperson _____________________________________ Dr. Donna Fox, Associate Dean, Student Affairs & Special Programs, College of Science ____________________________________________ Dr. Peggy Agouris, Dean, College of Science Date: __________________________________ Fall Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, A EVALUATING HUMAN THREATS TO THREE CANID SPECIES OF THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Stacie M. Bickley Master of Science Georgia Southern University, 2008 Bachelor of Arts Luther College, 2005 Director: Elizabeth Freeman, Associate Professor School of Integrative Studies Fall Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, VA COPYRIGHT 2016 STACIE M. BICKLEY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my Love, Ben Bickley. Ben, you have been by my side during this entire crazy journey. Every night while in the field, you patiently waited for my texts knowing I had to find the correct log to stand on in order to acquire a cellular signal. You fixed my car from 6,460 miles away and accompanied me into the field at 3:00 am to collect poop.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 AAZV Proceedings.Pdf
    PROCEEDINGS AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOO VETERINARIANS Orlando, Florida October 18 - 24, 2014 CONTINUINGCONTINUING EDUCATION EDUCATION Continuing education sponsored by the American College of Zoological Medicine. Continuing education sponsored by the American College of Zoological Medicine. Thanks to the Wildlife Conservation Society for their fi nancial support of the American College of Zoological Medicine to register as a certifi ed CE provider for the state of New York. Attendees licensed in New York will receive CE credits for the AAZV 46th Annual Conference in Orlando. DISCLAIMERDISCLAIMER TheThe information information appearing appearing in in this this publication publication comes comes exclusively exclusively fromfrom thethe authorsauthors andand contributorscontributors identified in each manuscript. The techniques and procedures presented reflect the individual knowledge, identified in each manuscript. The techniques and procedures presented reflect the individual experience, and personal views of the authors and contributors. The information presented does not knowledge, experience, and personal views of the authors and contributors. The information presented incorporate all known techniques and procedures and is not exclusive. Other procedures, techniques, and does not incorporate all known techniques and procedures and is not exclusive. Other procedures, technology might also be available. Any questions or requests for additional information concerning any oftechniques, the manuscripts and technology should be addressedmight also directly be available. to the Anyauthors. questions or requests for additional information concerning any of the manuscripts should be addressed directly to the authors. The sponsoring associations of this conference and resulting publication have not undertaken direct researchThe sponsoring or formal associations review to verify of this the conference information and contained resulting in thispublication publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Presence of Wild Animals
    Report of the Presence of Wild Animals The information recorded here is essential to emergency services personnel so that they may protect themselves and your neighbors, provide for the safety of your animals, ensure the maximum protection and preservation of your property, and provide you with emergency services without unnecessary delay. Every person in New York State, who owns, possesses, or harbors a wild animal, as set forth in General Municipal Law §209-cc, must file this Report annually, on or before April 1, of each year, with the clerk of the city, village or town (if outside a village) where the animal is kept. A list of the common names of animals to be reported is enclosed with this form. Failure to file as required will subject you to penalties under law. A separate Report is required to be filed annually for each address where a wild animal is harbored. Exemptions: Pet dealers, as defined in section 752-a of the General Business Law, zoological facilities and other exhibitors licensed pursuant to U.S. Code Title 7 Chapter 54 Sections 2132, 2133 and 2134, and licensed veterinarians in temporary possession of dangerous dogs, are not required to file this report. Instructions for completing this form: 1. Please print or type all information, using blue or black ink. 2. Fill in the information requested on this page. 3. On the continuation sheets, fill in the information requested for each type of animal that you possess. 4. Return the completed forms to the city, town, or village clerk of each municipality where the animal or animals are owned, possessed or harbored.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoary and Crab-Eating Foxes in Brazil
    Lemos et al. Hoary and crab-eating foxes in Brazil Canid News Copyright © 2011 by the IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. ISSN 1478-2677 The following is the established format for referencing this article: Lemos, F. G., Azevedo, F. C., Costa, H. C. M. and May Jr, J. A. 2011. Human threats to hoary and crab-eating foxes in central Brazil. Canid News 14.2 [online] URL: http://www.canids.org/canidnews/13/ Hoary_and_crab-eating_foxes_in_Brazil.pdf. Field Report Human threats to hoary and crab-eating foxes in central Brazil Frederico G. Lemos 1, 2 * , Fernanda C. Azevedo 2, Hugo C. M. Costa 3 and Joares A. 2, 4 May Junior 1 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, CEP:75704-020, Campus Catalão, Catalão, Goiás, Brazil. Email: [email protected] 2 Programa de Conservação Mamíferos do Cerrado - Rua Vereador Nicomedes Nunes número 135 / casa 09, CEP: 38446-000, Araguari, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Email: [email protected] 3. Rua Acre número 1861, CEP: 38402-022, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Email: [email protected] 4 Programa de Pós-graduação do Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal (VPS), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo-SP, Brazil. * Correspondence author Keywords : carnivore conservation, Cerdocyon thous , cerrado , human-wildlife conflict, Lycalopex vetulus . Abstract Introduction We report threats to hoary Lycalopex vetulus The hoary fox Lycalopex vetulus is a small can- and crab-eating foxes Cerdocyon thous at cattle id, endemic of cerrado vegetation in Brazil farms in the southeast of Goiás State, Brazil, (Dalponte, 1995; Eisenberg and Redford, 1999), and on a federal road at Minas Gerais state, and considered by IUCN/Canid Specialist including the possible first documented crab- Group one of the seven less studied canids of eating fox intentionally poisoned in Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Selected Features of the Family Canidae with Reference to Its Fundamental Taxonomic Status Barnabas Pendragon
    Papers A review of selected features of the family Canidae with reference to its fundamental taxonomic status Barnabas Pendragon Dogs comprise 35 extant species in 14 genera. They belong to the order Carnivora, which has common morphological and karyotypic features. Within the order, member species can be grouped based on heterologous DNA melting temperatures. The family Canidae forms such a group. Selected features of the Canidae are reviewed here in order to examine the fundamental taxonomic status of this family. Hybrid relationships demonstrate that the family Canidae is a single, reproductively compatible group having the taxonomic status of basic type. As opposed to the various species in the family whose formation was accompanied by genetic change, establishment of the domestic dog was accompanied by almost no genetic change; genetically all domestic dogs are grey wolves. The remarkable variation observed among the various breeds of domestic dog reflects the potential for morphological change hard-wired into the canid genome. The basic type appears to be divided into two subfamilies in the Cenozoic strata; the extant Caninae and the extinct Borophaginae. The ‘oldest’ known canid species is Prohesperocyon, which is found in upper Eocene fossil deposits. Q*HRUJH9HVWD0LVVRXULODZ\HUJDYHXVWKHDGDJH for slicing muscle tissue. However, in the omnivorous I“A dog is a man’s best friend”. More so than any other carnivores such as the bears, true carnassial teeth do not animal, dogs represent friendship and companionship. develop. Nevertheless, dogs, the Canidae, are beasts of prey Interestingly, the carnivore order has a largely belonging to the order Carnivora. They have long slender conservative Karyotype.
    [Show full text]