DOCSLIB.ORG

Select Preservation Priorities for FY 2022 Appropriations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE PRESERVATION BUDGET Select Preservation Priorities for FY 2022 Appropriations February 2021 The National Trust for Historic Preservation is a privately funded nonprofit organization that works to save America’s historic places. From our headquarters in Washington, D.C. and our field offices, we take direct, on-the-ground action when historic sites are threatened. Our work helps build vibrant, sustainable communities. We facilitate public participation in the preservation of sites, buildings, and objects of national significance or interest. We advocate with governments to save America’s heritage and we strive to create a cultural legacy that is as diverse as the nation itself so that all of us can take pride in our part of the American story. For more information, visit SavingPlaces.org. ON THE COVER: CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, COURTESY JOSEPH MCCARTY, FLICKR; THE NATIONAL WOMEN’S PARTY PICKETING AT THE WHITE HOUSE, COURTESY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; 16TH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, COURTESY US CIVIL RIGHTS TRAIL MARKETING ALLIANCE THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION is pleased to publish our third annual report recommending funding levels for select federal preservation programs. These programs have a significant impact on the stewardship of historic resources in every state and congressional district. Preservationists have long advocated for the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF), including funding for state and tribal historic preservation officers (SHPOs and THPOs). These offices implement the nation’s key preservation programs on the ground, including evaluating the impacts of federal projects, reviewing tax credit projects, and other essential activities. Congress recognizes the importance of the HPF and has increased funding during each of the past four years. Last year’s level of $144.3 million represented a record level for the HPF—a 78% increase over FY 2017. Much of this growth has been for grant programs that expand the scope of preservation to better tell a more diverse and inclusive American story. We were especially pleased that Congress continued to build upon the success of the African American Civil Rights Grant Program by funding the Civil Rights for All Americans Grant Program for its second year. The Underrepresented Community, Save America’s Treasures, and the Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization grant programs each received increased funding, and the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Grant Program was funded at its authorized level. And, for the first time, Congress awarded $10 million for grants to recognize the Semiquincentennial Celebration of the Declaration of Independence. As we seek to heal from divisions that challenge our nation and the need to address issues of racial and social justice, increased support for HPF programs will help us learn from our past and allow us to protect and preserve more sites and stories associated with historically disenfranchised and underrepresented groups. Additionally, increased funding for SHPOs, THPOs, and HPF competitive grant programs will support many historic rehabilitation projects, which create well-paying, preservation-related jobs that support investment in local communities. This report also recommends funding for other key agencies and programs that protect our nation’s cultural resources. While Congress has made significant advances in abating the nearly $12 billion maintenance backlog of the National Park Service, increased annual appropriations remain necessary to tackle the remainder of the backlog and prevent it from growing to such levels again. We also highlight programs of the Bureau of Land Management, which stewards the largest and most diverse body of cultural, historical, and paleontological resources on federal lands. We are hopeful this report will assist congressional staff and historic preservation stakeholders throughout the country appreciate and advocate for key federal programs that protect our nation’s historic legacy for the benefit of all Americans. SHAW SPRAGUE, VICE PRESIDENT OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS AND POLICY, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Contents PRESERVATION BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE . 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Historic Preservation Fund . 3–18 Deferred Maintenance . .19 Affiliated Areas . 21 Cultural Programs . 23 Office of International Affairs . 25 National Heritage Areas . 27 Other programs National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom . 29 African American Civil Rights Network . 31 Reconstruction Era National Historic Network . 33 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Cultural Resources Management . 35 National Conservation Lands . 37 DEPARTMENT-WIDE Land and Water Conservation Fund . 39 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES Advisory Council on Historic Preservation . .41 National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities . 43 LEFT: BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT BY DONALD J . ROMMES PRESERVATION BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE PROGRAM FY19–FY21 ENACTED LEVELS AND FY22 BUDGET REQUESTS (IN MILLIONS) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY22 ENACTED ENACTED ENACTED ADMIN NTHP REQUEST REQUEST Historic Preservation Fund State Historic Preservation Officers $49 .675 $52 .675 $55 .675 TBD $60 000. Tribal Historic Preservation Officers $11 735. $13 735. $15 000. TBD $24 000. African American Civil Rights Grants $14 .500 $15 .500 $16 750. TBD $19 000. Civil Rights for All Americans Grants NA $2 .500 $3 .375 TBD $7 000. Underrepresented Community Grant Program $0 750. $0 750. $1 000. TBD $1 000. Historically Black Colleges and Universities Grant Program $8 000. $10 000. $10 000. TBD $10 000. Save America’s Treasures $13 000. $16 000. $25 000. TBD $20 000. Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization Grants $5 000. $7 .500 $7 .500 TBD $9 000. Semiquincentennial Preservation Grants NA NA $10 000. TBD $0 000. Historic Preservation Fund (Total) $102.660 $118.660 $144.300 TBD $150.000 Deferred Maintenance Line-Item Construction Projects $147 011. $282 .956 $131 788. TBD $140 000. Repair and Rehabilitation $135 .980 $135 .950 $135 .980 TBD $150 000. Cyclic Maintenance $151 .575 $153 .575 $188 184. TBD $205 000. Other NPS Programs Affiliated Areas $5 .535 $5 .590 $5 .590 TBD $5 750. Cultural Programs $25 .562 $31 127. $31 .938 TBD $35 000. Office of International Affairs $1 .648 $1 .903 $1 .924 TBD $2 100. National Heritage Areas $20 .321 $21 .944 $23 .889 TBD $32 000. National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom $0 .849 $1 109. $1 .5001 TBD $1 000 . African American Civil Rights Network $0 000. $0 .250 TBD $1 000. Reconstruction Era National Historic Network NA $0 .250 TBD $1 000 . Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resources Management $17 131. $18 .631 $19 .631 TBD $21 131. Conservation Lands $39 .819 $43 .819 $45 .819 TBD $65 131. Land and Water Conservation Fund American Battlefield Protection Program $10 000. $13 000. $20 000. 2 TBD $20 000 . Land and Water Conservation Fund (Total) $435.000 $495.103 $900.000 TBD $900.000 Independent Agencies Advisory Council on Historic Preservation $6 .890 $7 .378 $7 .400 TBD $8 000. National Endowment for the Arts $155 000. $162 .250 $167 .500 TBD $176 000. National Endowment for the Humanities $155 000. $162 .250 $167 .500 TBD $225 000. 1 The final bill provides $1 .5 million total for these three networks and the World War II Heritage Cities Network . 2 The American Battlefield Protection Program is funded at $20 million through the Land and Water Conservation Fund as authorized by P .L . 113-287 . NOTE: The President’s budget request was not available at the time of printing. 2 FY 2022 APPROPRIATIONS | NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ^ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND Historic Preservation Fund The Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) is the principal source of funding to implement the nation’s historic preservation programs . Funding for the HPF comes from revenue generated by oil and gas development on the Outer Continental Shelf, not from taxpayer receipts . The HPF is authorized at $150 million annually, though it is subject to annual appropriations and has yet to receive full funding in any annual appropriation . Now part of the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument, the 16th Street Baptist Church in As the nation continues to contend with important issues of Birmingham, Alabama, was a key meeting place racial and social justice, increased support for HPF programs is for civil rights rallies led by Martin Luther King, Jr. as well as the site of the 1963 bombing that killed protecting and preserving more places and stories associated four young girls and injured 22 others. Four awards totaling $2 million from the African American Civil with historically disenfranchised and underrepresented groups . Rights Grant Program have supported the church’s Additionally, increased funding for State Historic Preservation five-year restoration plan of its National Historic Landmark sanctuary. Officers (SHPOs), Tribal Historic Preservation Officers PHOTO COURTESY US CIVIL RIGHTS TRAIL MARKETING ALLIANCE (THPOs), and HPF competitive grant programs will support many historic rehabilitation FY 2022 Appropriations Request projects, which create well-paying, Please support $150 million for the Historic Preservation Fund in preservation-related jobs and the FY 2022 Interior Appropriations bill. invest in local communities . APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Background AGENCY: National Park Service Preserving America’s diverse heritage, ACCOUNT: Historic Preservation Fund cultures, and traditions requires coordination of federal, state, local, Recent Funding History: and private
Recommended publications
  • Item: Resolution 10052, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Expansion, and New

    Item: Resolution 10052, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Expansion, and New

    Agenda # 11 Commission Meeting Date: February 18, 2014 CITY OF GREAT FALLS COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Item: Resolution 10052, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Expansion, and New Construction of Qualified Historic Properties Tax Abatement for Arvon Block Development Venture, LLC, located at 114 - 118 1st Avenue South, Great Falls, or The East 1/2 of Lot 4, and Lot 5, Block 368, Great Falls Original Townsite, Section 12, Township 20 North, Range 3 East, Cascade County, Montana From: Craig Raymond, Director of Planning and Community Development Initiated By: Arvon Block Development Venture, LLC Presented By: Craig Raymond, Director of Planning and Community Development Action Requested: City Commission conduct public hearing and adopt Resolution 10052 Public Hearing: 1. Mayor conducts public hearing, calling three times each for opponents and proponents. 2. Mayor closes public hearing and asks the will of the Commission. Suggested Motion: 1. Commissioner moves: “I move that the City Commission (adopt/deny) Resolution 10052.” 2. Mayor calls for a second, discussion and calls the vote. Staff Recommendation: Pursuant to Sections 15-24-1601 through 15-24-1607 Montana Code Annotated (2011), Staff requests the City Commission adopt Resolution 10052 granting a tax benefit to Arvon Block Development Venture, LLC, located at 114 -118 1st Avenue South, Great Falls, or the East 1/2 of Lot 4, and Lot 5, Block 368, Great Falls Original Townsite, Section 12, Township 20 North, Range 3 East, Cascade County, Montana. Background: The property owner, Arvon Block Development Venture, LLC, is renovating the Arvon Building, located at 114 – 118 1st Avenue South in the Great Falls Central Business District which stands as one of the last remaining examples of late 19th century commercial buildings in downtown Great Falls.

  • Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, Supports the Largest Seabird Nesting Colony South of Alaska

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Farallon National Wildlife Refuge Photo: ©PRBO Dense colonies of common murres and colorful puffins cloak cliff faces and crags, while two-ton elephant seals fight fierce battles for breeding sites on narrow wave-etched terraces below. Natural History Surrounded by cold water and plenty of food Pt. Reyes San Rafael G ulf o f Fa Golden ra ll Gate on s Bridge iles Oakland 28 M San Francisco C a li fo Fremont rn PACIFIC OCEAN ia San Jose Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, made up of all the Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, supports the largest seabird nesting colony south of Alaska. Thirteen seabird species numbering over 200,000 individuals Pigeon nest here each summer. Throughout the year, six species of marine mammals Guillemot breed or haul out on the islands. These islands are beside the cold California current which originates in Alaska and flows north to south, they are also surrounded Photo: © Brian O’Neil by waters of the Gulf of Farallons National Marine Sanctuary. Lying 28 miles west of San Francisco Bay the Refuge is on the western edge of the continental shelf. This area of Western gull the ocean plunges to 6,000 foot depths. Cold upwelling water brought from the depths as the wind blows surface water westward from the shoreline, and the California current flowing southward past the islands provides an ideal biological mixing zone along the continental shelf and around the San Francisco Bay area. Photos: © Brian O’Neil We stw ard Win ds Upwelling ent Mixing urr a C Deep rni lifo Ca Cold Water S N USGS Chart of seafloor Upwelling occurs notably in the spring depths around when these wind and water currents Farallon NWR work together and saturate ocean waters with nutrients brought up from Black the deep ocean.
  • Park Report Part 1

    Park Report Part 1

    Alcatraz Island Golden Gate National Recreation Area Physical History PRE-EUROPEAN (Pre-1776) Before Europeans settled in San Francisco, the area was inhabited by Native American groups including the Miwok, in the area north of San Francisco Bay (today’s Marin County), and the Ohlone, in the area south of San Francisco Bay (today’s San Francisco peninsula). Then, as today, Alcatraz had a harsh environment –strong winds, fog, a lack of a fresh water source (other than rain or fog), rocky terrain –and there was only sparse vegetation, mainly grasses. These conditions were not conducive to living on the island. These groups may have used the island for a fishing station or they may have visited it to gather seabird eggs since the island did provide a suitable habitat for colonies of seabirds. However, the Miwok and Ohlone do not appear to have lived on Alcatraz or to have visibly altered its landscape, and no prehistoric archeological sites have been identified on the island. (Thomson 1979: 2, Delgado et al. 1991: 8, and Hart 1996: 4). SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIOD (1776-1846) Early Spanish explorers into Alta California encountered the San Francisco Bay and its islands. (Jose Francisco Ortega saw the bay during his scouting for Gaspar de Portola’s 1769 expedition, and Pedro Fages described the three major islands –Angel, Alcatraz, and Yerba Buena –in his journal from the subsequent 1772 expedition.) However, the first Europeans to record their visit to Alcatraz were aboard the Spanish ship San Carlos, commanded by Juan Manuel de Ayala that sailed through the Golden Gate and anchored off Angel Island in August 1775.
  • Chicago Southland Economic Development Index

    Chicago Southland Economic Development Index

    Chicago Southland Economic Development Index Planning, Economic, and Community Development Organizations and Agencies for the Chicago Southland Region and the State of Illinois January 2004 Prepared by: Kristi DeLaurentiis, South Suburban Coordinator Metropolitan Planning Council Ellen Shubart, Campaign Manager Campaign for Sensible Growth and Maureen Wright, Economic Development Coordinator Village of Orland Park JAN 2004 This database originally prepared for the Economic Development Roundtable. Economic Development Roundtable members include: · Campaign for Sensible Growth · Chicago Southland Alliance · Chicago Southland Chamber of Commerce · Chicago Southland Convention and Visitors Bureau · Chicago Southland Development, Inc. · EnterprizCook County · Metropolitan Planning Council · Metro Southwest Alliance · Southwest Council of Mayors · South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association JAN 2004 GOVERNMENT / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT / PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS Organization Contact Leading Efforts: Objectives, Programs & Initiatives Accion Chicago Leroy Pacheco · ACCION Chicago is dedicated to strengthening the economies of President & CEO Chicago's neighborhoods by providing "micro" loans and business- 3245 W. 26th Street, 2nd Floor related services to low and moderate-income individuals who are Chicago, IL 60623 striving to support themselves and their families through self- PH: (773) 376-9004 x101 employment. FAX: (773) 376-9048 · ACCION Chicago provides this credit and helps small business [email protected] owners to increase their
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) Theme: 19th-century Architecture UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS _____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC Letter II Building_________________________________ AND/OR COMMON Sears, Roebuck and Company __ ______ CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Chicago VICINITY OF 7th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Illinois Cook CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _D I STRICT —PUBLIC XX.OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM -XBUILDING(S) XXPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED XXcOMMERCIAL —PARK _STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED XX.YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Mr. Dean A. Swift, President (312-875-2500) STREET & NUMBER Sears, Roebuck and Company, Sears Tower CITY, TOWN STATE Chicago VICINITY OF Illinois 60680 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Cook County Recorder's Office STREETS NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Chicago Illinois REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey, OAHP, National Park Service, Dept. of Interior DATE ^FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress CITY, TOWN STATE Washington D.C. DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED XXoRIGINAL SITE J?GOOD —RUINS XXALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED The dimensions of the building were stupendous for the period. It is 144 feet deep on Van Buren and Congress and 402 feet long on State Street. It is 132 feet high, eight stories in height, each floor had 16 foot ceilings when constructed it was one of the largest buildings in the world in floor area and cubic volume.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is twofold: to provide general information for anyone interested in the California islands and to serve as a field guide for visitors to the islands. The book covers both general history and nat- ural history, from the geological origins of the islands through their aboriginal inhabitants and their marine and terrestrial biotas. Detailed coverage of the flora and fauna of one island alone would completely fill a book of this size; hence only the most common, most readily observed, and most interesting species are included. The names used for the plants and animals discussed in this book are the most up-to-date ones available, based on the scientific literature and the most recently published guidebooks. Common names are always subject to local variations, and they change constantly. Where two names are in common use, they are both mentioned the first time the organism is discussed. Ironically, in recent years scientific names have changed more recently than common names, and the reader concerned about a possible discrepancy in nomenclature should consult the scientific literature. If a significant nomenclatural change has escaped our notice, we apologize. For plants, our primary reference has been The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, edited by James C. Hickman, including the latest lists of errata. Variation from the nomenclature in that volume is due to more recent interpretations, as explained in the text. Certain abbreviations used throughout the text may not be immedi- ately familiar to the general reader; they are as follows: sp., species (sin- gular); spp., species (plural); n.
  • Shark Encounters, Cage Diving in the Farallon Islands, California

    Shark Encounters, Cage Diving in the Farallon Islands, California

    One Day Dive Adventures The Farallon Islands Our Shark Team “The Devil’s Teeth” When you join us for a Great White Shark Our Incredible Great White Shark Adventures depart adventure to San Francisco’s Farallon from San Francisco’s famous Fisherman’s Wharf. Islands, you’ll find yourself in very good hands. We’re proud of our staff and when you dive with You’ll need to be at the dock by 6:00 am to get checked us, you’ll understand why. Here are just two of in and ready for a prompt 6:30-7:00 am departure. Total the great people you may meet: time at the dive site varies, but expect to be back at the dock between 5-6 pm. A continental breakfast, hot Greg Barron is our Director of West Coast Shark lunch and beverages are provided for you. Our boat is Ops. Greg has spent his entire life living and div- equipped to handle 12 divers and 6 topside viewers in ing along the North Coast of California and has comfort. been part of our shark dive operation since the beginning. Greg helped the great Located roughly 20 miles off the coast of San people at DOER Marine Cage Dives: $875 Top Side Viewing: $ 375 Francisco is a series of land formations known design and build our as the Farallon Islands. The islands lie within massive shark cage and the Gulf of the Farallones Marine Sanctuary, has worked to transform Full payment is required the day you book your dive and 1255 square miles of protected waters deemed our boat into an incredible is NON-REFUNDABLE.
  • Farallon National Wildlife Refuge California

    Farallon National Wildlife Refuge California

    92d Congress, 1st Session --------- House Document No. 92-102 FARALLON NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE CALIFORNIA COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING FOURTEEN PROPOSALS TO ADD TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS SYSTEM PART 10 APRIL 29, 1971. —Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed with illustrations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1971 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL1 THE WHITE HOUSE WAS H I NGTON April 28; 1971 Dear Mr. Speaker: The Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964, declared it to be the policy of the Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness, and for that purpose the act established a National Wilderness Preservation System. In my special message on the environment of February 8, 1971, I stressed the importance of wilderness areas as part of a comprehensive open space system. In these un- spoiled lands, contemporary man can encounter the character and beauty of primitive America -- and learn, through the encounter, the vital lesson of human interdependence with the natural environment. Today, I am pleased to transmit fourteen proposals which would add to the National Wilderness System vast areas where nature still predominates. These areas are briefly described below. (1) Simeonof National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska -- 25,140 acres of a unique wildlife environment: the bio- logically productive lands and waters of Simeonof Island off the coast of Alaska. (2) North Cascades National Park, Washington — 515,880 acres in two areas in North Cascades Park and Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas.
  • A FEW of WILL COUNTY's HISTORIC ATTRACTIONS! We Would Like to Extend a Warm Invitation for You to Visit the Places That Showcase Will County's Rich Heritage

    A FEW of WILL COUNTY's HISTORIC ATTRACTIONS! We Would Like to Extend a Warm Invitation for You to Visit the Places That Showcase Will County's Rich Heritage

    Will County’s Historic ATTRACTIONS along the I-355 Extension WELCOME TO A FEW OF WILL COUNTY'S HISTORIC ATTRACTIONS! We would like to extend a warm invitation for you to visit the places that showcase Will County's rich heritage. By visiting our attractions, you will gain an appreciation as to why communities within Will County are committed to preserving the places that make them unique and provide a sense of place. The identified sites are in close proximity to the I-355 South Extension. We hope you return again to visit not just these historic attractions but other landmarks throughout the entire Heritage Corridor region. 1 12 BOLINGBROOK 53 LEMONT . d R er t Riv ie es t. l in in S o Pla Ma J Des Illinois & Michigan Canal Gaylord Building Heritage Corridor 200 West Eighth St. ROMEOVILLE Lockport, IL 60441 127th St. 2 . 11 e v 135th St. Romeo Rd. A r e h rc A N 2 HOMER GLEN PLAINFIELD 3 Airport Rd. 151st St. Renwick Rd. 4 7 Isle a la Cache Museum 12 Schmuhl School 501 E. Romeo Rd. 20733 S. Schoolhouse Rd. t d S LOCKPORT R y 1 r a New Lenox, IL 60451 Romeoville, IL 60446 CREST HILL a w d il d e ra a C T n o l r o a 5 t B n 175th St. g a min C Bloo . go M a 53 d hic & . C I R S 3 30 r 10 a g u 6 o 7 G Theodore St. t 6 S s n i l l o 7 C JOLIET NEW LENOX .
  • Affected Environment 4

    Affected Environment 4

    Section 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 4. Affected Environment 4.0 Affected Environment The study corridor used to identify various resources within the program’s affected environment is comprised of the seven sections described in Chapter 3, Section 3.3.7.1 and illustrated in Exhibit 3.3‐10. Depending on the resource and the available information collected, the width of the study corridor ranges from 100 feet to the counties in which the study corridor traversed. The study corridors are described in each of the resource sections. 4.1 Existing Land Use 4.1.1 Development Patterns Historically, Chicago and St. Louis have served as major continental transportation centers, both tracing their origins to water and rail transportation routes. Chicago prospered from its strategic location on Lake Michigan and access to eastern markets through the Erie Canal and the Great Lakes. St. Louis originally developed from its role as a port on the Mississippi River that provided access to domestic and foreign markets. During the 19th Century, the addition of railroads linking these cities forged an economic lifeline between Chicago and St. Louis. Construction of the rail network spawned the growth of numerous communities that served as regional centers for the collection and distribution of goods for a rich agricultural region. The influence of the railroad remained strong until interstate highways joined the transportation system in the 1950s and 1960s. In contrast to the railroads, which created new communities along their length to maintain and support the railroads, interstate highways were constructed around, and often bypassed some communities. Because the interstates had limited points of access, county roads that connected with or crossed over them linking existing communities, became particularly important to the rural areas.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Arvon Block other name/site number: 2. Location street & number: 114-116 First Avenue South not for publication: n / a vicinity: n/a city/town: Great Falls state: Montana code: MT county: Cascade code: 013 zip code: 59401 3. Classification Ownership of Property: Private Category of Property: Bu i 1 d ing Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing building(s) sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: n/a 4. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of certifying offllcAal Date MONTANA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau See Continuation Sheet 5. National Park Service Certification tetered In tKe I, hereby certify that this property is National entered in the National Register See Continuation Sheet determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register See Continuation Sheet removed from the National Register.
  • Project Description

    Project Description

    Chicago-St. Louis Environmental Assessment 6.0 Distribution List 6.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST 6.1 Agency Coordination 6.1.1 Federal Agencies Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Highway Administration, Illinois Division Federal Transit Administration, Region 5 National Park Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District U.S. Coast Guard, Eighth District U.S. Coast Guard, Ninth District U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife, Chicago Field Office U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife, Rock Island Field Office U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife, Marion Illinois Suboffice U.S. Department of the Interior, Illinois & Michigan Canal U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 U.S. Senator Richard Durbin U.S. Senator Roland Burris U.S. Senator Kit Bond U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill U.S. Representative, Bobby Rush, District No. 1 U.S. Representative, Jessie Jackson, Jr., District No. 2 U.S. Representative, Daniel Lipinski, District No. 3 U.S. Representative, Luis Gutierrez, District No. 4 U.S. Representative, Danny Davis, District No. 7 U.S. Representative, Debbie Halvorsen, District No. 11 U.S. Representative, Jerry Costello, District No. 12 U.S. Representative, Judy Biggert, District No. 13 U.S. Representative, Timothy Johnson, District No. 15 U.S. Representative, Aaron Schock, District No.