A WEC Energy Forum Gubernatorial Candidates Speak to Costs, Climate Change, and Vermont’S Energy Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A WEC Energy Forum Gubernatorial Candidates Speak to Costs, Climate Change, and Vermont’S Energy Future www.washingtonelectric.coop Vol. 71, No. 4 The newsletter of Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc., East Montpelier, Vermont. June 2010 A WEC Energy Forum Gubernatorial Candidates Speak to Costs, Climate Change, and Vermont’s Energy Future hey came to discuss energy, the Republican candidate had come, “One of the most important but I think people learned more Tissues facing our state today about these Democratic candidates and in the coming years,” as WEC by being in the room with them and President Barry Bernstein framed it. hearing them answer the questions Line Foreman Tim Pudvah at work in the forest canopy off the County Road in Washington Electric Co-op’s Board and display their personalities. I East Montpelier. The veteran WEC lineman is shown replacing transmission- of Directors had extended think it went really well.” line insulators, part of a project to replace 495 of them this summer. an invitation to all of It was nearly 7 the major-party p.m. – almost candidates for a half-hour governor of after the Vermont in scheduled An Open House 2010 to par- 6:30 start ticipate in an – when In Plainfield energy forum the five at the Co-op’s candidates WEC Member’s House Was Too ‘Open’ May 12 Annual arranged Membership themselves on Before Home Performance Work Meeting, and the Matt Dunne (center), shown with the dais in the five Democratic WEC President Barry Bernstein Montpelier Elks udy Cyprian opened up her idea. In 2009 she contracted with contend- (right), was one of five Democratic Club dining Plainfield home to strangers Montpelier Construction L.L.C., a ers accepted. candidates for governor speaking at hall. Secretary Jon a sunny afternoon in May, residential-construction company Republican can- the Co-op’s Annual Meeting. of State Deb and some three dozen people nationally certified to carry out the didate, Lt. Gov. Markowitz, dropped by. And though most of them analyses and renovations that meet Brian Dubie, declined to attend – and from Montpelier, and Matt Dunne, a were, indeed, strangers, they had the standards of the program known missed what turned out to be an former state senator from Hartland something in common with Judy: an as Home Performance with ENERGY interesting, enlightening event. currently working in the communi- interest in tightening up their homes, STAR™. Judy was the hostess that “We didn’t know how it would go,” cations-technology field, had arrived cutting their fuel and electricity costs, Sunday afternoon, May 23, but Bernstein said afterward. “But I’ve earlier, but the three candidates and relieving at least some of the the event was sponsored jointly by had lots of people come up to me serving in the Vermont Senate burden that energy consumption Efficiency Vermont and Washington and say they really enjoyed it. The were delayed at the Statehouse in poses upon the earth and the Electric Co-op. (Judy is a WEC candidates [who participated] were the Legislature’s final hours. When environment. member.) all from the same party, so there Sens. Susan Bartlett (Hyde Park) The difference was that Cyprian There was a table well-stocked wasn’t as much difference of opinion had already taken those steps, with exceptional snacks and cold continued on page 4 as there probably would have been if while her visitors were exploring the continued on page 7 Washington Electric Inside Cooperative 71 years and counting. Washington Electric Co-op East Montpelier, VT 05651 held its 71st Annual Membership Meeting in May, and it was a memorable event. For a recap of an interesting, enjoyable evening, see page 2. Does a FREE home-energy audit appeal to you? See how you can try to win this valuable prize on page 8. All Hands On Deck! WEC’s operations crew has undertaken a major project on Co-op transmission lines in the central part of the service territory, aimed Annie Reed of Marshfield has at preventing outages. Get a taste for what line work wanted to serve her fellow is like, with story and photos on page 6. Co-op members, running Launching the energy debate – and there may twice in as many years for be no topic more important to the state’s future. WEC’s Board of Directors. This Coverage of the forum among gubernatorial time she won. Further Annual candidates at the Co-op’s Annual Meeting continues Meeting coverage starts on of page 4. page 2. Page 2 • Co-op Currents, June 2010 www.washingtonelectric.coop Ten Candidates, Two Elections, And Some Straight Talk Members Elect Four to the WEC Board at 2010 Annual Meeting EC members will have to wait another six months to find “Ninety-nine percent of your Wout which, if any, of the five Co-op’s power comes from non- candidates for governor of Vermont fossil-fuel sources. We’re one of who attended the Co-op’s 71st Annual the few electric utilities in the Membership Meeting on May 12 will be country that can make that claim.” elected to lead the state. — WEC President Barry Bernstein But the results of another election were announced that very evening. Annie Reed of Marshfield and Scott Skinner of Middlesex were newly Andrea Colnes’ term, following her elected to Washington Electric recent resignation. Skinner can run for Cooperative’s Board of Directors. re-election in 2012. Re-elected to the Board were Roy The fifth candidate was Steven Clay Folsom of Cabot and WEC President of Middlesex, who collected 714 votes. Barry Bernstein of Calais. It was a “Seven-hundred and fourteen five-way race for four available seats votes is a good total for the first time on the nine-member Board. Bernstein someone runs,” noted President collected the most votes, with 1,019, Bernstein. “I’d like to thank Steven It’s not all business at a WEC Annual Meeting. Like the folks above, people also followed by Folsom with 919. Reed, and encourage him to stay involved, come to socialize and enjoy a good meal together. running for the second time after an because that’s what we need to keep unsuccessful attempt in 2009, came in this a strong Co-op.” colleagues in public power: Eric Werner – which will contribute additional third with 856 votes, trailed by Skinner The focus of the Annual Meeting and Joe Wood of the Hardwick Electric renewable power to WEC’s electricity (800 votes), a well-known community this year was a forum on energy issues Department; CEO Dave Hallquist of portfolio – also was present, as was leader who had not previously run for among gubernatorial candidates (story Vermont Electric Co-op, with several George Clain, president of IBEW Local the Co-op’s Board. on page one). current and past board members and 300, the union that represents most of The tally means that Bernstein, A good-sized crowd of 199 people VEC employees; and David Mullett WEC’s employees. Folsom, and Reed will serve the usual attended the dinner and meeting on a of the Vermont Public Power Supply Elected officials at the meeting three-year terms. Skinner will complete mild spring evening at the Montpelier Authority (VPPSA). Josh Bagnato of were State Rep. Tony Klein, D-East the final two years of former Director Elks Club. Special guests included First Wind, the company seeking to Montpelier, chair of the House Natural build a 40-MW wind farm in Sheffield Resources & Energy Committee (and Co-op Currents Co-op Currents (Publication No. USPS 711 -210 and ISSN Right of Way Reclearing Projects Scheduled No. 0746-8784) is published monthly except February, May, Affected Members with ‘Special Trees’ Should Call the Co-op August and November by Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc., Route 14, P.O. Box 8, East Montpelier, Vermont 05651. WEC is part of the he Co-op will continue working to improve service reliability by reclear- alliance working The cost of this publication is $.44, which is included in the ing power-line rights of way in the areas described below. Right-of-way to advance and reclearing normally involves removing trees and pruning vegetation for 15 basic monthly charge to each member. Periodical postage support the T rates paid at East Montpelier and at additional offices. principles of feet on either side of a single-phase distribution line, and for 25 feet on either cooperatives in Postmaster: Send address changes to Co-op Currents, side of a three-phase main distribution line. Except where noted, all of these Vermont. projects involve single-phase lines, those carried by poles without cross-bars. P.O. Box 8, East Montpelier, Vermont 05651. Reclearing projects often involve a tap. That’s where a single-phase line takes power from another line. Board of Directors Throughout the year, post cards are mailed to members notifying them that President BARRY BERNSTEIN 1237 Bliss Road, Marshfield, Vt. 05658 456-8843 right-of-way maintenance is to take place. Also, WEC’s automated message- (May 2013) [email protected] delivery system will place a phone call (if a phone number is on file) to all Vice President ROGER FOX 2067 Bayley-Hazen Rd., East Hardwick, 563-2321 households affected by such maintenance projects, up to two or three weeks (May 2012) Vt. 05836-9873 [email protected] before work on the property is to begin. Calls will be placed in the evening, Treasurer DONALD DOUGLAS 21 Douglas Rd., East Orange, Vt. 05086 439-5364 when most members are likely to be home. If no one answers, Co-op staff will (May 2011) [email protected] attempt to reach that member during the day.
Recommended publications
  • OFFICIAL RETURN of VOTES Democratic Party Race Candidate
    PRIMARY ELECTIONS AUGUST 26, 2014 Pursuant to the Primary Election Warning recorded in the Town Records, Book 20, page 339, the Polls were declared open at 7:00 A.M. by the Town Clerk in the three polling districts. The three polling districts are stated in the Warning. At 6:55 P.M. the Town Clerk warned that the polls would close in 5 minutes. At 7:00 P.M. the polls were declared closed. After declaring the polls closed a printout from the Accu-Vote ballot tabulator containing the results was run. The “unofficial” returns were then distributed at the polling places. Ballot summaries were compiled by the Town Clerk and evening election workers. Upon completion of the count, all voted ballots were sealed in boxes. All unvoted ballots, tabulators with sealed memory packs, printouts, tally sheets and district supply boxes were returned to the Town Clerk’s office. The following persons were declared elected in their respective primary races. OFFICIAL RETURN OF VOTES Democratic Party Race Candidate Write-In Dist 1 Dist 2 Dist 3 Total Representative to Peter Welch 263 311 362 936 Congress The following individuals received 1 vote each: Pat McPike, Mark Donka, Paige Martin, Donald Russell, Pat Lapan, Evan Chadwick, and Matthew Andrews. Governor H. Br ooke Paige 27 28 35 90 Peter Shumlin 229 281 335 845 Scott Milne 0 4 3 7 Emily Peyton 3 2 0 5 Doug Racine 2 0 2 4 The following individuals received 1 vote each: Matt Dunne, William Wilmot, Steve Berry, Doug Cox, Bernie Sanders, Barbara Holliday, and Bruce Lisman.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • GWEC Global Wind Report 2016
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2016 Opening up new markets for business: Mongolia 8TH NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY FORUM Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 5 May 2017 Mongolia’s wind has the technical potential of 1TW. GWEC is paving the road to that potential. www.gwec.net TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface . 4 Foreword from our sponsor . 6 Corporate Sourcing of Renewables – A New Market Driver for Wind . 8 Global Status of Wind Power in 2016 . 12 Market Forecast 2017-2021 . 20 Argentina . 26 Australia . 28 Brazil . 30 Canada . 32 Chile . 34 PR China . 36 Denmark . 40 The European Union . 42 Finland . 44 Germany . 46 India . 48 Japan . 50 Mexico . 52 Netherlands . 54 Norway . 56 Offshore Wind . 58 South Africa . 66 Turkey . 68 United States . 70 Vietnam . 72 About GWEC . 74 GWEC – Global Wind 2016 Report 3 PREFACE verall, the wind industry fi nished up 2016 in good installations of 8,203 MW were about the same as 2015’s, and shape, with solid prospects for 2017 and beyond. The despite the political goings-on, seem to be on track for a strong O economics of the industry continue to improve, with 2017, with 18+ GW either under construction or in advanced record low prices for the winning tender in Morocco last year stages of development. So far so good – fi ngers crossed! of about $30/MWh, and very competitive prices in auctions Europe’s numbers were surprisingly strong, actually sur- around the world, while more and more companies’ P&Ls have passing 2015 for Europe as a whole on the strength of Turkey’s come out of the red and into the black.
    [Show full text]
  • 1910 1912* 1914 1916 1918
    1910 Leighton P. Slack [Republican] 36,638 68.1% John B. Reardon [Democratic] 15,186 28.2% J. Frank Bradbury [Socialist] 1,067 2.0% Fred L. Page [Independent] 927 1.7% Scattering 2 0.0% Total votes cast 53,820 100.0% 1912* Frank E. Howe [Republican] 27,232 43.3% Herbert C. Comings [Democratic] 18,395 29.2% M. L. Aseltine [Progressive] 14,609 23.2% Fred A. Collins [Prohibition] 1,470 2.3% Allan P. Bourdon [Socialist] 1,184 1.9% Scattering 7 0.0% Total votes cast 62,897 100.0% 1914 Hale K. Darling [Republican] 35,505 59.3% James E. Kennedy [Democratic] 15,382 25.7% Edward C. Crosby [Progressive] 7,049 11.8% John M. Perham [Prohibition] 1,010 1.7% J. Frank Bradbury [Socialist] 901 1.5% Scattering 6 0.0% Total votes cast 59,853 100.0% 1916 Roger W. Hulburd [Republican] 42,564 71.4% Henry C. Brislin [Democratic] 15,302 25.7% Antoine Winner [Socialist] 897 1.5% George A. Kerr [Prohibition] 799 1.3% Scattering 19 0.0% Total votes cast 59,581 100.0% 1918 Mason S. Stone [Republican] 30,149 73.2% Henry C. Brislin [Democratic] 10,031 24.3% John M. Perham [Prohibition] 1,028 2.5% Scattering 1 0.0% Total votes cast 41,209 100.0% General Election Results: Lieutenant Governor, p. 15 of 24 1920 Abram W. Foot [Republican] 63,632 76.7% Abram W. Foot [Prohibition] 1,000 1.2% George F. Root [Democratic] 18,265 22.0% Scattering 17 0.0% Total votes cast 82,914 100.0% 1922 Franklin S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Response from Vermont Public Serv
    Baily and Seager Therrien, March 9, 2014 HISTORY OF THERRIEN FAMILY PLEA FOR HELP, 2012 - 2014 Response from Vermont Public Service Board to Luann Therrienʼs email of Feb. 6, 2014 Steven N Luann Therrien Dear Ms. Therrien: The Board members have received and reviewed your e-mail dated February 6, 2014. The Board understands that your family has concerns regarding noise impacts from the operation of the First Wind generation facility in Sheffield. However, the Board is not an agency tasked with providing legal representation or legal advice to individuals or entities, whether they are parties in a Board proceeding or not. Accordingly, the Board is unable to undertake on your behalf any of the actions you describe in your e-mail. If you have already done so with respect to this matter, you may choose to contact the Department of Public Service with your concerns. Sincerely, Susan M. Hudson Clerk of the Board Like · · Share · March 6 at 3:47pm ----------------------------------- March 6, 2014 Luann Therrienʼs post on Facebook group Victims of Industrial Wind, which she started: I would like to thank First Wind and all their supporters for making our lives a complete nightmare!!!! Every aspect of our existence is now consumed by someone else's greed profit and unrealistic goal set for renewables. So blinded by the set goal and money to be made that the damage done to land home and health is the least of their worries. 2 We have been told by our Drs. to not work. We have no disposable $, what we have we hold onto tightly in our effort to flee.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Wind Power and Wildlife
    BREATH OF LIFE: ETHICAL WIND POWER AND WILDLIFE Reed Elizabeth Loder∗ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................507 I. Wind Power in Vermont’s Green Mountain National Forest.............................509 II. Federal Public Lands: What Public, What Uses? ..............................................512 III. Benefits, Costs, and Precautions .......................................................................517 IV. Implementing Precautions: Alternatives, On-Site Mitigation, and Off-Site Mitigation..............................................................................................................518 A. Alternatives.......................................................................................518 B. On-Site Mitigation...........................................................................519 C. Off-Site Mitigation..........................................................................520 V. Bears Themselves................................................................................................522 VI. Relationships, Wildlife, and Community .........................................................525 VII. Distributive Justice Issues ................................................................................526 VIII. Virtue and Bears..............................................................................................529 Conclusion .................................................................................................................530
    [Show full text]
  • State Primary
    OFFICIAL RETURN OF VOTES ELECTIONS DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Town BURLINGTON Election PRIMARY ELECTION (08/11/2020) District CHI-6-1 1. Total Registered Voters on checklist for this polling place: 6,582 2. Total Number of Voters checked off on the entrance checklist: 2,790 (this includes absentee ballots) 3. Total number of absentee ballots returned: 2,016 (Include this count in Line 2) 4. Total number of ballots voted by the Accessible Voting System: 0 5. Total number of DEFECTIVE ballots (not counted but name checked off checklist): 133 (Enter the Total Defective ballots from the Defective Ballot Envelope. -- DO NOT include REPLACED ballots.) 6. TOTAL BALLOTS COUNTED: (Number of voters checked off checklist minus 2,666 defective ballots.) I Total number of ballots counted for DEMOCRATIC 2,042 I I Total number of ballots counted for PROGRESSIVE 13 I Total number of ballots counted for REPUBLICAN 611 I 7. Total number of PROVISIONAL ballots (to be sent to Secretary of State): 0 If line 6 (Total Votes Counted.) and the sum of the ballots counted for each party DO NOT agree, you must explain the discrepancies below and continue - Line 6 will be adjusted accordingly: .Human Error marking Checklist . ! Ballot bag seal#: 266931, 1296636 0 I hereby certify, under the pains and penalties of perjury, that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.By checking this box, no signature is needed and you agree to the terms and conditions under Vermont law. lr?J-v L:1i!!t~ KATHERINE SCHAD ~:T~ I1YCLERK CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 11/10/2020 149 CHURCH STREET, BURLINGTON, VT, 05401 Page 1of109 Town BURLINGTON Election PRIMARY ELECTION District CHI-6-1 RALPH "CARCAJOU" CORBO DEMOCRATIC WALLINGFORD 90 I PETER WELCH DEMOCRATIC NORWICH 1,880 I TOTAL WRITE IN COUNTS DEMOCRATIC Si CHRIS BRIMMER (Write-in) DEMOCRATIC 3 ---· -- GREG DUSABLON (Write-in) DEMOCRATIC j TIM ASHE (Write-in) DEMOCRATIC OTHER WRITE IN COUNTS 0 OVERVOTES I~PH "CARCAJOU" CORBO DEMOCRATIC REBECCA HOLCOMBE DEMOCRATIC .
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Impacts to Raptors (PDF)
    To: John Ford, Director From: Bob Roy County of Humboldt Planning and Building Stantec Consulting Department 30 Park Drive 3015 H Street Topsham, ME 04222 Eureka, California 95501 [email protected] Date: August 23, 2019 Reference: Operational Impacts to Raptors Humboldt Wind has commissioned Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to review the draft EIR for the Humboldt Wind Project and provide a re-evaluation of the DEIR’s analysis of potential impacts to raptors. WEST is a firm that is expert in conducting ecological studies and analyzing complicated natural resource data. The attached memo provides WEST’s recommended analysis of the likely impacts of the project on raptors. As noted in WEST’s memo, the DEIR appears to overestimate what the likely impacts of the project will be on local and regional raptor populations. The DEIR reviews several data sets but does not set an explicit expectation of what the project’s likely impact will be. Rather, it reviews a range of potential impacts using different datasets and metrics, and then concludes that impacts will be significant and unavoidable after mitigation. However, WEST’s analysis provides compelling evidence that the DEIR’s analysis is flawed and that actual impacts at the project are likely to be significantly less than that stated in the DEIR and would not lead to local or regional populations of raptor species to fall below self-sustaining levels. Key to this analysis, or the difference between the two analyses, is that raptor impacts at the Humboldt project would not be similar to those documented at projects in central and southern California (where raptor use is far greater than at the project) and the fact that raptor use at the project site is very similar to that documented at Hatchet Ridge, where raptor fatalities have been found to be very low after three years of post-construction monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwec – Global Wind Report | Annual Market Update 2015
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2015 Opening up new markets for business “It’s expensive for emerging companies to enter new markets like China. The risk of failure is high leading to delays and high costs of sales. GWEC introduced us to the key people we needed to know, made the personal contacts on our behalf and laid the groundwork for us to come into the market. Their services were excellent and we are a terrific referenceable member and partner.” ED WARNER, CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER, SENTIENT SCIENCE Join GWEC today! www.gwec.net Global Report 213x303 FP advert v2.indd 2 8/04/16 8:37 pm TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Preface 6 Global Status of Wind Power in 2015 8 Market Forecast 2016-2020 20 Australia 26 Brazil 28 Canada 30 PR China 32 The European Union 36 Egypt 38 Finland 40 France 42 Germany 44 Offshore Wind 46 India 54 Japan 56 Mexico 58 Netherlands 60 Poland 62 South Africa 64 Turkey 66 Uruguay 68 United Kingdom 70 United States 72 About GWEC 74 GWEC – Global Wind 2015 Report 3 FOREWORD 015 was a stellar year for the wind industry and for Elsewhere in Asia, India is the main story, which has now the energy revolution, culminating with the landmark surpassed Spain to move into 4th place in the global 2Paris Agreement in December An all too rare triumph of cumulative installations ranking, and had the fifth largest multilateralism, 186 governments have finally agreed on market last year Pakistan, the Philippines, Viet Nam, where we need to get to in order to protect the climate Thailand, Mongolia and now Indonesia are all ripe
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Results
    U.S. Senator Candidate TOTAL Percent Len Britton (Pomfret) - Republican 200 22% Stephen J. Cain ( Burlington) - Independent 8 1% Pete Diamondstone (Brattleboro) - Socialist 0 0% Cris Ericson (Chester) - United States Marijuna 7 1% Daniel Freilich (Wilmington) - Independent 15 2% Patrick Leahy (Middlesex) - Democratic 627 70% Johenry Nunes (Isle LaMotte) - Independent 0 0% Write In: 0 0% Write In: 0 0% Write In: 0 0% Spoiled 1 0% Blank 36 4% TOTALS 896 100% Representative to Congress Candidate TOTAL Percent Paul D. Beaudry (Swanton) - Republican 211 24% Gus Jaccaci (Thetford) - Independent 21 2% Jane Newton (Londonderry) - Socialst 7 1% Peter Welch 625 70% Write In: Len Britton 1 0% Write In: 0 0% Spoiled 2 0% Blank 29 3% TOTALS 896 100% Governor Candidate TOTAL Percent Brian Dubie (Essex) - Republican 345 39% Cris Ericson (Chester) - Independent 4 0% Dan Feliciano (Essex) - Independent 6 1% Ben Mitchell (Westminster) - Liberty Union 1 0% Em Peyton (Putney) - Independent 3 0% Peter Shumlin (Putney) - Democratic/Working Families 517 58% Dennis Steele (Kirby) - Independent 9 1% Write In: Matt Dunn 2 0% Write In: Phil Scott 1 0% Write In: Doug Racine 2 0% Spoiled 1 0% Blank 5 1% TOTALS 896 100% Lieutenant Governor Candidate TOTAL Percent Peter Garritano (Shelburne) - Independent 28 3% Steve Howard (Rutland City) - Democratic 359 40% Marjorie Power (Montpelier) - Progressive 41 5% Phil Scott (Berlin) - Republican 416 46% Boots Wardinski (Newbury) - Liberty Union 5 1% Write In: 0 0% Spoiled 0 0% Blank 47 5% TOTALS 896 100% State Treasurer Candidate
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Contributions from the Corrections Corporation of America
    James M. Jeffords Center’s Vermont Legislative Research Service 3 Campaign Contributions from the Corrections Corporation of America The Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) is a private corrections management industry that was founded in 1983. CCA specializes in the “design, construction, expansion and management of prisons, jails, and detention facilities, as well as inmate transportation services” and has become the “private corrections provider of choice” for both federal and state agencies.1 CCA currently houses 75,000 detainees in over 60 facilities throughout the nation and partners with the three federal corrections agencies (the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the US Marshals Services, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement).2 CCA is the fifth largest corrections system in the nation (behind the three federal corrections agencies and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation).3 CCA has also been prevalent in political elections, making campaign contributions to nominees who may support stricter prison policies, enabling CCA to stay in business.4 The National Influence of CCA CCA is a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a conservative lobby group that is based in Washington DC and is specifically invested in criminal justice discussions.5 1 Corrections Corporation of America, “About CCA,” CCA, accessed November 9, 2011, http://www.cca.com/about. 2 Corrections Corporation of America, “About CCA,” CCA, accessed November 9, 2011, http://www.cca.com/about. 3 Office of Research, “Population Reports,” California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation accessed November 9, 2011, http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Reports_Research/Offender_Information_Services_Branch/Population_Reports.html 4 Harvey Silvergate and Kyle Smeallie, “Freedom Watch: Jailhouse Bloc,” The Boston Phoenix, December 9, 2008, accessed November 9, 2011, http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/73092‐Freedom‐watch‐Jailhouse‐ bloc/?page=3#TOPCONTENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Division Office of the Secretary of State
    OFFICIAL RETURN OF VOTES ELECTIONS DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Town BURLINGTON Election GENERAL ELECTION (11/06/2018) District Cffi-6-1 1. Total Registered Voters on checklist for this polling place: 6,968 2. Total Number ofVoters checked off on the entrance checklist: 4,060 (this includes absentee ballots) 3. Total number of absentee ballots returned: 937 (Include this count in Line 2) 4. Total number of ballots voted by the Accessible Voting System: 0 5. Total number of DEFECTIVE ballots (not counted but name checked off checklist): 43 (Enter the Total Defective ballots from the Defective Ballot Envelope. -- DO NOT include REPLACED ballots.) 6. TOTAL BALLOTS COUNTED: (Number of voters checked off checklist minus 4,055 defective ballots.) 6.1 Total Number of Ballots Counted at Polls: 4,055 7. Total number of PROVISIONAL ballots (to be sent to Secretary of State): 0 If Line 6 (voters checked off checklist minus defective ballots) and Line 6.1 (total number of ballots counted at the polls) do not agree, please explain the discrepancies below and continue - Line 6 will be adjusted: :Confusion between City and General absentee ballots led to errors marking the checklist, human error Ballot bag seal#: 10266023,0376050,0376046,0210846,001279157 0 I hereby certify, under the pains and penalties of perjury, that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.By checking this box, no signature is needed and you agree to the terms and conditi under Vermont law. 11/08/2018 149 CHURCH STREET, BURLINGTON, VT 05401 Page 1 of84 ~Ii~B~m~=~=~~~~~~s,01l1t:Y!I~::.·,·~~~ .~~.:,i~'"'~~.~.
    [Show full text]