DOCSLIB.ORG

Shrine Vista Planning Study Pdf 13 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shrine Vista Planning Study Pdf 13 MB THe sHRINe oF REMEMBRANCE Managing the significance of the Shrine Lest forgetwe A Planning Scheme Reference Document July 2013 Prepared by Message Consultants Australia Pty Ltd with input from Lovell Chen. Published by Message Consultants Australia Pty Ltd Melbourne July 2013 © Message Consultants Australia Pty Ltd The copyright in this document is owned by Message Consultants Australia Pty Ltd. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 EXECUTIVe SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Background contents6 1.2 Purpose 7 1.3 Approach 8 2 THe SHRINe aNd iTs cONTEXT 9 2.1 Location 9 2.2 Siting 9 2.3 Current redevelopment 12 2.4 Study areas 12 3 SIGNIFICANCe of tHe SHRINE 13 3.1 Historical significance 13 3.2 Architectural significance 14 3.3 Aesthetic significance 15 3.4 Social significance 15 4 HOw tHe SHRINE’s sIGNIFICANCe is pERCEIVEd 21 4.1 Aspect Vistas 23 4.2 Prospect views 25 4.3 Sense of place 27 5 HOw tHe SHRINE’s sIGNIFICANCe cOULd be cOMPROMISED 29 5.1 Aspect view intrusions 29 5.2 Prospect view impacts 32 5.3 Secondary building impacts 36 6 EXISTINg cONTROLs aNd pOLICY 38 6.1 Heritage controls 38 6.2 State Planning Policy Framework (SPPF) 39 6.3 Local Planning Policy Frameworks (LPPF) 39 6.4 Built form controls 40 7 MODELLINg pOTENTIAl iMPACTS 52 7.1 Three-Dimensional modelling 52 7.2 What the technical analysis shows 58 7.3 Key outcomes 59 8 RECOMMENDEd aPPROACH 62 Recommendation 1: State Planning Policy 62 Recommendation 2: Local Planning Policy 62 Recommendation 3: Type of control 62 Recommendation 4: Heights 63 Recommendation 5: Shrine Vista Computations Manual 65 Recommendation 6: Secondary built form considerations 65 Recommendation 7: Referrals and notification 65 3 ExecutiveEXEcutive SUMMARY summary This report has been prepared to inform the key viewpoints to build a picture of existing preparation of planning provisions within and potential impacts and their relationship the Melbourne, Port Phillip and Stonnington with existing planning controls within the three Planning schemes designed to protect the relevant planning schemes. significance of the Shrine of Remembrance as The report suggests that there are three main Victoria’s most important place of remembrance ways in which the significance of the Shrine and commemoration. could be compromised: The report provides a summary of the Shrine’s • By foreground and background (silhouette) significance and how this significance is intrusions into the axial views from the state perceived through views to and from the Shrine library; building as well as sensory experience within • By building height impacting the context and the Shrine Reserve. It provides analyses of the sense of place of the Shrine; and impact of built form and how this is managed • By secondary built form amenity impacts by the existing framework of planning controls such as reflectivity, shadows, signs and winds. around the Shrine. The investigations found that the use of the The analyses are based on an understanding Shrine Vista Control (which is derived from of how we perceive the built environment and the Shrine Vista Computations Manual) has draws on best practice from around the world successfully protected the vista to the Shrine in protecting views to important buildings, as down Swanston Street and St Kilda Road. well as urban design theory about how humans However, buildings in the background of this read buildings and built form. The technical vista affect the Shrine’s prominence in views analyses used 3-D modelling of various scenarios from points along this axis and there is a need and investigated viewlines from a number of to amend existing planning controls to ensure 4 the shrine of remembrance: Managing the significance of the Shrine that this effect is not made worse. I n addition, • Design and Development Overlays (DDOs) the scale of some buildings in proximity to the are considered the preferred planning tool Shrine Reserve, to the south and west, have an to manage built form around the Shrine, overbearing impact because of their height and but these need to be modified to remove Executive summary so the height of future buildings needs to be inconsistencies between their expression and managed to protect the unique sense of place application in the Cities of Melbourne, Port of the Shrine. The analyses also showed that Phillip and Stonnington. there is a lack of consistency in existing planning • The recommended approach to building controls and policy, in relation to views as well as heights suggests mandatory height limits in the secondary impacts mentioned above. proximity to the Shrine to the west, south The results of these investigations were that, west and south and discretionary preferred whilst historic and existing planning controls heights covering the wider context. These have largely been successful in protecting are shown in Figure 8.1 (on page 64). the Shrine vista, the increasing pressure for • The Shrine Vista Computations Manual must development in the area means that a more be correctly and consistently applied across sophisticated set of planning controls is required the entire computations area as a mandatory to protect the overriding significance of the requirement within the relevant DDO Shrine and Shrine Reserve. Amended planning controls. controls should protect a wider range of • The building and works requirements viewpoints against a range of built form impacts, of all DDO provisions for the area west providing greater certainty for the development of St Kilda Road should be updated to industry and the public and a more consistent include reflectivity/glare, signs, wind and approach across the three planning schemes overshadowing considerations. that cover the Shrine and its wider context. • Notification and referral arrangements Recommendations are set out in detail in for the Shrine of Remembrance Trustees Section 7 of the report and are summarised should be amended to recognise the below: mandatory controls recommended for areas in proximity to the Shrine and to reduce the • The State Planning Policy Framework should administrative burden. be amended to specifically identify theS hrine as Victoria’s largest and most important war These recommendations are based on memorial and include objectives to protect considerable technical analysis. This analysis and conserve its cultural significance. is not reproduced in detail within the report but rather the approach and key findings are • The Local Planning Policy Frameworks in explained, using illustrative material from the the City of Melbourne, Port Phillip and analysis where necessary. Stonnington Planning Schemes should be amended to reference the State significance of the Shrine and its landmark qualities. They should include specific objectives and strategies on how to manage the land to guide the decision-making process. Executive Summary 5 1 INTRODUCTION The Shrine of Remembrance (‘the Shrine’) is the The Advisory Committee’s recommendations pre-eminent place of remembrance in Victoria were: and is of great historical, architectural, aesthetic • To refuse the permit application due and social significance. to unreasonable impact on the cultural This report has been prepared to inform the significance of theS hrine of Remembrance. development and application of planning • For Heritage Victoria to consider reviewing controls and planning policy relating to the the Shrine’s Statement of Significance to protection of the Shrine within the Cities address the impact of external development of Melbourne, Port Phillip and Stonnington on the cultural significance of the Shrine. Planning Schemes. • That Amendment C125 be approved subject The report is based upon a detailed review of to changes. relevant planning controls around the Shrine Amendment C125, which lapsed in April 2010 that was undertaken in 2012 by Message and was replaced by Ministerial Amendment Consultants and Lovell Chen. It summarises the C155 to the Melbourne Planning Scheme, findings of this work and provides an overview introduced Design and Development Overlay of the significance of the Shrine, how this DDO58 to establish mandatory 60m (71mAHD) 1 significance is perceived, the potential built form height and 20m setback controls on this site. threats to the Shrine and its setting, and the Following the PAC’s recommendations, the rationale for implementing consistent planning Statement of Significance for the Shrine was controls to protect the significance of theS hrine. updated in 2009 and The Shrine Conservation Management Plan (CMP) was also renewed and 1.1 BACKGROUND updated in 2010. One of the recommendations of the revised CMP was that a review of the A review of planning controls around the Shrine existing planning controls be undertaken of Remembrance was initiated following the with the objective of ensuring that future discovery of an apparent oversight in the pre- development in the surrounding areas does not existing height controls for a site at 312-322 detrimentally impact on the Shrine. St Kilda Road in 2008. A process was also initiated by the Department A subsequent City of Melbourne Planning for Planning and Community Development Permit Application 2008/0758 for a large (DPCD) along with stakeholders, to resolve the building on the site triggered Melbourne issue of development and building envelope Planning Scheme Amendment C125, which controls around the Shrine. This report sought to introduce discretionary 60 metre summarises the work undertaken on behalf of height controls to the land. the Shrine Trustees, describes the key issues In 2009, the then Minister for Planning considered and the overall rationale for built established a Planning Advisory Committee form controls designed to better manage (PAC) to concurrently consider the proposed and protect the significance of theS hrine of amendment and the planning permit application. Remembrance. 6 the shrine of remembrance: Managing the significance of the Shrine 3. Height and setback controls on new buildings, 1.2 PURPOSE generally to the north, west and south of the Shrine (mainly in the form of Design and Most places of ‘reverence’ in our cities Development Overlays).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Domain Parklands Master Plan 2019-2039 a City That Cares for the Environment
    DOMAIN PARKLANDS MASTER PLAN 2019-2039 A CITY THAT CARES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental sustainability is the basis of all Future Melbourne goals. It requires current generations to choose how they meet their needs without compromising the ability of future generations to be able to do the same. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners The City of Melbourne respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) people of the Kulin Nation and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. For the Kulin Nation, Melbourne has always been an important meeting place for events of social, educational, sporting and cultural significance. Today we are proud to say that Melbourne is a significant gathering place for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. melbourne.vic.gov.au CONTENTS A City That Cares For Its Environment 2 4. Master Plan Themes 23 1. Overview 5 4.1 Nurture a diverse landscape and parkland ecology 23 1.1 Why do we need a master plan? 6 4.2 Acknowledge history and cultural heritage 24 1.2 Vision 7 4.3 Support exceptional visitor experience 28 1.3 Domain Parklands Master Plan Snapshot 8 4.4 Improve people movement and access 32 1.4 Preparation of the master plan 9 4.5 Management and partnerships to build resilience 39 1.5 Community and Stakeholder engagement 10 5. Domain Parklands Precincts Plans 41 2. Domain Parklands 11 5.1 Precinct 1 - Alexandra and Queen Victoria Gardens 42 2.1 The history of the site 11 5.2 Precinct 2 - Kings Domain 43 2.2 The Domain Parklands today 12 5.3 Precinct 3 - Yarra Frontage and Government House 44 2.3 Strategic context and influences 12 5.4 Precinct 4 - Visitor Precinct 45 2.4 Landscape Characters 14 5.5 Precinct 5 - Kings Domain South 46 2.5 Land management and status 15 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of German Science and Scientists on Melbourne Observatory
    CSIRO Publishing The Royal Society of Victoria, 127, 43–58, 2015 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/rs 10.1071/RS15004 INFLUENCES OF GERMAN SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS ON MELBOURNE OBSERVATORY Barry a.J. Clark Astronomical Society of Victoria Inc. PO Box 1059, GPO Melbourne 3001 Correspondence: Barry Clark, [email protected] ABSTRACT: The multidisciplinary approach of Alexander von Humboldt in scientific studies of the natural world in the first half of the nineteenth century gained early and lasting acclaim. Later, given the broad scientific interests of colonial Victoria’s first Government Astronomer Robert Ellery, one could expect to find some evidence of the Humboldtian approach in the operations of Williamstown Observatory and its successor, Melbourne Observatory. On examination, and without discounting the importance of other international scientific contributions, it appears that Melbourne Observatory was indeed substantially influenced from afar by Humboldt and other German scientists, and in person by Georg Neumayer in particular. Some of the ways in which these influences acted are obvious but others are less so. Like the other Australian state observatories, in its later years Melbourne Observatory had to concentrate its diminishing resources on positional astronomy and timekeeping. Along with Sydney Observatory, it has survived almost intact to become a heritage treasure, perpetuating appreciation of its formative influences. Keywords: Melbourne Observatory, 19th century, Neumayer, German science The pioneering holistic approach of Alexander von (Geoscience Australia 2015). In 1838 Carl Friedrich Gauss Humboldt in his scientific expeditions to study the natural helped put Humboldt’s call into practice by setting up world had a substantial, lasting and international influence the Göttinger Magnetische Verein (Göttingen Magnetic on a broad range of scientific fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Precincts: History and Significance
    MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 0 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Perky'Ile Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12. Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 68 Background History 68 Statement of Significance for Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 69 13. Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 72 Background History 72 Statement of Significance for Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 73 14.
    [Show full text]
  • ANZAC Day Resources
    ANZAC Day Worship Resource Content Preface …3 Introduction …4 Service of Remembrance …5 Gathering …6 Word ...13 Remembrance …17 Sending …24 General Prayers …26 Hymn Suggestions …30 Public Services …33 Images Front Page 3rd Light Horse Chap Merrington 1915 Gallipoli Page 3 3rd Light Horse Burial ANZAC Day 1917 Cairo Page 5 1st Light Horse Funeral at Cairo Presbyterian Cemetary 1914-15 Page 6 CoE RC and Presb. Chaplains bury four British soldiers 1915 Page 13 Church parade at Ryrie's Post 1915 Gallipoli Page 17 3rd Light Horse Chap Merrington 1915 Gallipoli Page 25 Grave of an Australian Soldier 1915 Gallipoli Page 27 Soldiers on Gallipoli listening to sermon 1915 Page 31 Chaplain writing field card Greece, Date Unknown Page 34 Brockton WA WW! Memorial after ANZAC Day Service !2 Preface This resource has been compiled by Uniting Church in Australia ministers who are current- ly in placement as Chaplains in the Australian Defence Force. Some of them have seen deployments in places of war and served for many years while others are new to this min- istry who care for sailors, soldiers and airmen and women in the ADF and their families. These traditional and interactive prayers have been provided for congregations that will be remembering Australians throughout the centenary year of World War 1 and in particular the landings at Gallipoli. The prayers in this resource have been broken up in light of the four fold structure of wor- ship, as found in Uniting in Worship 2: Gathering, Word, Remembrance, and Sending. There is a fifth section which has been compiled from prayers used by Chaplains in public services, such as ANZAC Days and Remembrance Days.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Planning Scheme
    MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME REFERENCE DOCUMENT CITY OF MELBOURNE HERITAGE PRECINCTS BACKGROUND HISTORY & SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT This document is a reference document to Clause 22.06 of the Melbourne Planning Scheme REFERENCE DOCUMENT PAGE 1 OF 12 FEBRUARY 2007 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Parkville Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Popular Culture and the Vietnam War Jeff Od Yle
    Vietnam Generation Volume 3 Number 2 Australia R&R: Representation and Article 10 Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam 1-1991 Dismembering the Anzac Legend: Australian Popular Culture and the Vietnam War Jeff oD yle Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Doyle, Jeff (1991) "Dismembering the Anzac Legend: Australian Popular Culture and the Vietnam War," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol3/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dismembering the Anzac legend: Australian Popular Culture and the Vietnam W ar J eff Doyle The longevity and continuity of a particular strand of its popular mythology mark a culture’s deepest concerns, reflecting the repeated and continuing attempts to formulate that culture’s responses to, and its interpretations and evaluations of. particular social and political crises. Development of new narratives, or substantial modifications to existing myths, signal areas of active ideological concern where crises or ruptures within the cultural structures and their valuation may be occurring. The representation of Australian involvement in Vietnam, and its often uneasy conflation with aspects of the Anzac legend and its surrounding myths, provide just such locations of rupture in Australian culture. For both Australia and the US, the Vietnam war has challenged the dominating popular imagery of their fighting men.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomical Society of Victoria 76.77 Kb
    Lp248VicParliamentSubmissionEnvironmentHealth.doc SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA INC TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING REFERENCES COMMITTEE OF THE VICTORIAN PARLIAMENT ON THE CONTRIBUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN TO PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH IN VICTORIA Date of submission: 30 June 2011 by email, hard copy following by mail Name of submitter: Dr Barry A. J. Clark Director of the Outdoor Lighting Improvement Section Astronomical Society of Victoria Inc (Registered number A0002118S) Submitter’s contact details: Address: Watch Out Observatory 6 Dunluce Court Viewbank Victoria 3084 Telephone: (03) 9459 2760 Email: [email protected] Documents Accompanying this Submission on CDROM Listed by File Name Please note that some of the following items listed were obtained by the submitter as single copies for research, teaching and private study purposes. If readers desire additional copies for their own use, please obtain such copies in accordance with any applicable copyright requirements. AmerMedAssn2009Resolution 516 on LP.doc. Advocating and support for light pollution control efforts and glare reduction for both public safety and energy savings. American Medical Association, Resolution 516. ANSES (2010) Press kit. Lighting systems using light-emitting diodes: health issues to be considered. 25 October 2010. France: Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES, the French National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety). Online at http://www.afssa.fr/Documents/PRES2010CPA14EN.pdf . The full report in French is at http://www.afssa.fr/Documents/AP2008sa0408.pdf Holzman2011NewScientistLANBlueAlert.doc. Blue alert: the dark side of night light. Article by D. C. Holzman in New Scientist, Issue 2811, 10 May 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Australia's First Woman Sculptor and Her War Memorials
    In Memoriam: World War I memorials by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930). Margaret A. Rose, FAHA, FRHistS Margaret Francis Ellen (“Nell”) Baskerville was born in Melbourne, Victoria in 1861 and was one of the first Australian-born women artists to become a professional sculptor. This brief illustrated account of her war memorials is based on my study of her work and that of her husband and fellow sculptor C. Douglas Richardson, which was published for the Brighton (now Bayside) City Council collection of their paintings and sculpture under the title Victorian Artists. Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) and C. Douglas Richardson (1853-1932) in 1988. Several memorials to the fallen were commissioned and completed by sculptors as well as by stonemasons in Australia in the aftermath of the “Great War”. Many are recorded, and some are illustrated, in the numerous editions of Sacred Places: War Memorials in the Australian Landscape by K.S. Inglis, assisted by Jan Brazier, of 1998, as well as – more recently – on websites such as those for the “Monument Australia” and “Victorian Heritage” databases. As Inglis has noted, the majority of the war memorials unveiled in the public spaces of Australian towns following World War I had been for – and had illustrated – the male soldiers who had fought and fallen in battle. Amongst the memorials built and unveiled following World War I were, however, also two by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) for the British nurse Edith Louisa Cavell. Cavell (born in Norfolk, England in 1865) had trained as a nurse in London under a friend of Florence Nightingale (Matron Eva Luckes), had taken up work in Belgium and been executed there at dawn on 12 October 1915 by order of the German Military Governor of Brussels for having assisted in the escape of allied soldiers, and despite the fact that she had tended the wounded of both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Secret Gardens
    Flinders Street Melbourne Walks To begin, walk south along St Kilda Road until you’re opposite the Arts Centre Federation Melbourne, then step down to the left into Square the peaceful Queen Victoria Gardens 1 . N Pause for a royal moment to inspect the Secret Queen Victoria Monument 2 . Princes 2 Wander along the many pathways in the Bridge Birrarung Marr Gardens garden, under the shade of tall trees, past Hamer glorious flower displays and across sunny Hall lawns. Discover the sculptures 3 dotted Arts Centre Melbourne through the park, including The Phoenix, Boa t h ouse Sculptures, monuments, State, Fairfax The Pathfinder, The Water Children, Water Studio & D Playhouse 43 Alexandre r the Arts Centre Melbourne and the Arts Centre Melbourne Steps iv Nymph and The Genii. Ale Gardens e xandr beautiful Royal Botanic Gardens. 1 Riverslide Walk back towards St Kilda Road and ad a Queen 42 Skate 4 A Park you’ll find the much lovedFloral Clock Victoria v Walking time 2.5 hours a Ro enue opposite the National Gallery of Victoria. Gardens 40 NGV ild Distance 6 Kilometres International 2 Look up to the equestrian statue of Queen t K S 3 5 41 Victoria’s son Edward VII . 5 4 Avenue hg ow Just over Linlithgow Avenue near Walker Linlit 10 Aboriginal 39 Fountain, cross to the ‘Tan’ 6 , where Burial Stone Melbourne’s fit and fabulous come to jog. Henley Kings Landing The 4km track was named after its original 6 9 Domain Tan 38 bark surface and used by horse riders until Track 7 L inlit the 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • View the ANZAC Day 2021 Order of Service
    Westminster Abbey A Service of Commemoration and Thanksgiving to mark ANZAC Day Sunday 25th April 2021 Noon Crete, 1941. A happy meeting of troops of the Australian Imperial Forces and the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces on the island. 2021 marks the 80th anniversary of the Greece and Crete Campaigns of WW2. Image supplied by the Australian War Memorial. HISTORICAL NOTE This year marks the 106th anniversary of the landings on the Gallipoli Peninsula on 25th April 1915. The Gallipoli campaign exacted a heavy toll on both sides. Some 50,000 Allied troops from the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, France, Newfoundland, and India lost their lives. Including those wounded or evacuated for sickness, the total number of Allied casualties numbered around 250,000. The Turkish forces lost over 86,000 in addition to those wounded. Australian and New Zealand forces fought for the first time under a united command as the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, or, more famously, the ANZACs. Casualties at Gallipoli amounted to almost 9,000 Australians killed and in excess of 19,000 wounded. For New Zealand, near to 3,000 lost their lives and over 5,000 were wounded. These figures do not include those who died as a result of mental trauma in the years following. In both countries, ANZAC Day, 25th April, not only commemorates those first landings at Gallipoli, but also all the Australians and New Zealanders who have served their countries in time of conflict, and especially those who have given their lives in that service. After a year in which we have borne hardships of a very different kind from the sufferings which the ANZACs endured—the shocking effects of the worst global pandemic in a century—we take, as the theme for ANZAC Day 2021, “Remembrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Botanic Gardens – Conserving Australia’S Plants for the Future
    Royal Botanic Gardens – conserving Australia’s plants for the future Royal Botanic Gardens Board Victoria Annual Report 2000/01 Contents Contact Details and Maps ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS MELBOURNE Patron, Dame Elisabeth Murdoch AC DBE Mission IFC ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MELBOURNE Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne Charter, Values 1 Birdwood Avenue Birdwood Avenue Major Achievements 2 (Private Bag 2000) (Private Bag 2000) South Yarra Victoria South Yarra Victoria Major Challenge 4 Mission Australia 3141 Australia 3141 Chairman’s Foreword 6 Telephone +61 3 9252 2300 Telephone +61 3 9252 2303 Facsimile +61 3 9252 2442 Facsimile +61 3 9252 2413 Director’s Report 7 To advance the knowledge and Email [email protected] Email [email protected] Corporate Governance 8 enjoyment of plants, and to Internet site www.rbg.vic.gov.au Internet site www.rbg.vic.gov.au The Organisation 10 ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS Donations to the Royal Botanic Gardens CRANBOURNE Melbourne of more than $2 are Generous Financial Support 14 foster their conservation, in 1000 Ballarto Road tax-deductible. The Royal Botanic Gardens is an authorised recipient insti- Corporate Plan Priorities 16 Cranbourne Victoria tution in the Federal Government’s Australia 3977 order to give people a better Cultural Gifts Program. Annual Outputs Telephone +61 3 5990 2200 Plant Sciences 18 Facsimile +61 3 5990 2250 FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, MELBOURNE INC understanding of the essential Email [email protected] ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS CRANBOURNE Management of Administered Assets 20 Internet site www.rbg.vic.gov.au Gate Lodge Birdwood Avenue Visitor Programs 22 part that plants play in all life AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR URBAN ECOLOGY South Yarra Victoria Australia 3141 Businesses 24 Telephone +61 3 9650 6398 c/o School of Botany Facsimile +61 3 9650 7723 Volunteers, Support Groups and on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ Copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RMIT Research Repository Thank you for downloading this document from the RMIT Research Repository. The RMIT Research Repository is an open access database showcasing the research outputs of RMIT University researchers. RMIT Research Repository: http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/ Citation: Porter, L, Jackson, S and Johnson, L 2019, 'Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1119-1137. 6HHWKLVUHFRUGLQWKH50,75HVHDUFK5HSRVLWRU\DW https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:56299 9HUVLRQ Accepted Manuscript &RS\ULJKW6WDWHPHQW The Author(s) 2019 /LQNWR3XEOLVKHG9HUVLRQ https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819852362 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362 Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne Libby Porter1, Sue Jackson2 and Louise Johnson3 Abstract When the enormous drapes that had been covering a new building in central Melbourne were thrown off in early 2015, an extraordinary sight was revealed: a colossal image of a face staring down the city’s civic spine. This moment of unveiling marked a fascinating moment for Indigenous-settler relations in Australia, but especially urban, densely settled Melbourne. For the face is that of William Barak, ancestor and leader of the Wurundjeri people, whose country was stolen and remade into what we now know as Melbourne. That an early land rights champion is represented in the built form at such a pivotal location in the city that dispossessed his people offers an opportunity to consider the forms of violence, appropriation and misrepresentation that are perpetually constitutive of settler-colonial cities.
    [Show full text]