Altimeter Data for Operational Use in the Marine Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Altimeter Data for Operational Use in the Marine Environment ALTIMETER DATA FOR OPERATIONAL USE IN THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT Susan Digby, Thomas Antczak Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California Robert Leben, George Born, Suzanne Barth University of Colorado, Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research, Boulder, Colorado Robert Cheney NOAA, Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry, Silver Spring, Maryland David Foley NOAA Coastwatch, and University of Hawaii, JIMAR, Honolulu, Hawaii Gustavo Jorge Goni NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, PhO, Miami, Florida Gregg Jacobs Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi Nick Shay University of Miami, Rosentiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Miami, Florida ABSTRACT an Earth orbiting satellite, have been used extensively by the science community to better TOPEX/Poseidon has been collecting altimeter understand ocean circulation and the role of the data continuously since October 1992. Altimeter oceans in climate and weather. As derived products data have been used to produce maps of sea surface have been made available, use of the data for height, geostrophic velocity, significant wave height, operational purposes has increased, as it has become and wind speed. This information is of proven use to evident that the data complements other information mariners as well as to the scientific community. Uses at the mariners disposal. It has also become apparent of the data include commercial and recreational that incorporation of altimeter data into weather and vessel routing, ocean acoustics, input to geographic climate forecasts increases the accuracy of these information systems developed for the fishing products. industry, identification of marine mammal habitats, II. PRODUCT TYPES fisheries management, and monitoring ocean debris. As with sea surface temperature data from the Product types include maps of sea surface height, Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) geostrophic velocity, significant wave height, and in the late 1980s and early 1990s, altimeter data wind speed. Products of most use to mariners are from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2 are in the likely to be sea surface anomaly maps with process of being introduced to the marine world for superimposed geostrophic velocity vectors. operational maritime use. It is anticipated that over the next few years companies that specialize in A. Sea Surface Height producing custom products for shipping agencies, fisheries and yacht race competitors will be Sea surface height is defined as the distance of incorporating altimeter data into their products. The the sea surface above a known reference surface, data are also being incorporated into weather and such as the earth's ellipsoid or the marine geoid. The climate forecasts by operational agencies both in the sea surface height is computed from altimeter range US and Europe. This paper will discuss these and satellite altitude above the reference ellipsoid. products, their uses, operational demonstrations and (The "reference ellipsoid" is the first-order definition means of accessing the data. of the non-spherical shape of the Earth as an ellipsoid of revolution with equatorial radius of I. INTRODUCTION 6378.1363 kilometers and a flattening coefficient of 1/298.257.) An alternate reference surface to the Altimeter data products are in the process of earth's ellipsoid is the marine geoid, which is defined making the transition from scientific to operational as the shape the ocean would take if it were at rest. use. Altimeter data from TOPEX/Poseidon, which is When altimeter data are referenced to an ellipsoid the dominant pattern seen is the order 100 meter Current enters the Gulf between Yucatan and Cuba, amplitude signal of the marine geoid corresponding then loops and exits south of Florida through the to changes in sea surface height associated with Florida Straits. Circular streamlines depict the changes in the mass distribution of the earth. These locations of energetic anticyclonic (sea surface highs changes in height reflect changes in the gravity field shaded light gray) and cyclonic (sea surface lows and are useful for marine geology and offshore oil shaded dark gray) eddies that commonly occur in the and gas exploration. Of more interest to mariners is Gulf. The contour increment is 5 cm and every 10 the sea surface height relative to the geoid, which cm are annotated. This type of product is available shows the order one meter sea surface height on a daily basis from the University of Colorado. changes associated with the mean and time varying ocean circulation. Unfortunately, errors in current B. Geostrophic Velocity Vectors estimates of the marine geoid are large enough to prevent the accurate mapping of the mean Geostrophic velocity vectors are also a widely circulation at the smaller scales (<10 degrees) of used product and the vectors are most often provided interest to mariners. Fortunately, the time varying superimposed on maps of sea surface height or sea component can be measured accurately using an surface height anomalies. The geostrophic current is altimeter. For this reason sea surface height is often a major component of oceanic surface currents. shown as a sea surface height anomaly or deviation, Ocean currents are a function of wind forcing, tidal the difference between the sea surface height at the forces, buoyancy, and the Earth's rotation and time of measurement and the average sea surface gravity. The earth's gravity acts to move water from height for that region. Producers of these data use areas of higher water levels (pressure) to lower water various averages; some averages include all levels (pressure). When this component of the current available data and some averages are specific to caused by pressure is balanced with the component seasons. To recover the total sea surface height caused by the earth's rotations (Coriolis effect), the associated with the ocean circulation, a "synthetic" current is said to be geostrophic. In the deep ocean a observation is constructed by adding the mean large percentage of the ocean surface current is dynamic height determined from shipboard often in geostrophic balance and can be computed hydrographic measurements taken over the years to by knowing the changes in sea surface height and the anomaly. Maps derived by adding the sea surface the latitude of the point of interest. height anomaly to an estimated mean surface from hydrography realistically depict the total sea surface height associated with regions of persistent current such as the Gulf Stream in the North Atlantic and the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico. Fig. 2. Estimated geostrophic flow field associated with the total sea surface height field depicted in Fig. 1. The flow field is visualized using streamlines determined from a 2-day integration of simulated particles released at grid points of the geostrophic velocity field. The magnitude of the geostrophic velocity is proportional to the sea surface slope and is Fig. 1. Synthetic total sea surface height field for the directed along isolines of constant height with higher Gulf of Mexico on February 11, 1999. This field was surface height values to the right (left) when facing in constructed by adding the mean sea surface height the direction of flow for the northern (southern) field from realistic numerical simulation of the Gulf hemisphere. Note the strong clockwise and to the interpolated altimeter measurements of counterclockwise circulation associated with the TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-2 with respect to a long- anticyclonic and cyclonic eddies in the Gulf, term altimetric mean field. The streamlines (isolines respectively. This type of product is available on a of height) of the flow associated with the Loop daily basis from the University of Colorado. C. Wind Speed Wind speed as measured from an altimeter is an indirect measurement based on the small-scale roughness of the sea surface. Wind speed is measured from the strength of the returned signal. There is a reliable relationship between the energy scattered from near-nadir and the wind speed. The altimeter does not give wind direction. Satellite scatterometer wind observations can used to determine both wind direction and magnitude and are of more use to the operational maritime community, however, wind speed from altimetry is useful for comparisons to these products. Altimetrically derived wind speeds are also valuable for generating wind climatologies because of the Fig. 3 Example of a chart provided to mariners by long time series available. private industry. D. Significant Wave Height III. APPLICATIONS OF SPACEBORNE ALTIMETRY DATA Significant wave height is calculated from altimeter data based on the slope of the leading A. Ship Routing edge of the altimeter waveform, which is similar to a binned (time) histogram of the power returned by the Maps of sea surface anomalies overlaid with radar pulse after it bounces off the sea surface. A velocity vectors have been used in commercial calm sea with low waves returns a short, sharply shipping and competitive sailing to optimize the defined pulse whereas a rough sea with high waves route from one destination to another. The maps are returns a stretched pulse because the energy begins used to locate ocean features such as currents and to come back from the tops of the waves and eddies which are associated with high currents. In continues until the pulse hits the valley of the wave. cases where the rhumb line, the shortest distance The significant wave height is the average height of between two points goes though strong currents a the highest one-third of all waves in a particular time variety of tactics can be used. In the case where the period. Wave direction is not provided by altimeter rhumb line crosses orthogonal to a current, sailors are data. Maps of significant wave heights and wave likely to cross at a point and at an angle such that the height climatologies are useful for ship routing. duration of the crossing is minimized. E. Combined Data Products Where the rhumb line crosses eddies, mariners use knowledge of the location of the eddies and velocity Combined data products are a final category of vectors to optimize their route.
Recommended publications
  • Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design
    LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 ii DEEP SPACE COMMUNICATIONS AND NAVIGATION SERIES Issued by the Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Center of Excellence Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Joseph H. Yuen, Editor-in-Chief Published Titles in this Series Radiometric Tracking Techniques for Deep-Space Navigation Catherine L. Thornton and James S. Border Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation Theodore D. Moyer Bandwidth-Efficient Digital Modulation with Application to Deep-Space Communication Marvin K. Simon Large Antennas of the Deep Space Network William A. Imbriale Antenna Arraying Techniques in the Deep Space Network David H. Rogstad, Alexander Mileant, and Timothy T. Pham Radio Occultations Using Earth Satellites: A Wave Theory Treatment William G. Melbourne Deep Space Optical Communications Hamid Hemmati, Editor Spaceborne Antennas for Planetary Exploration William A. Imbriale, Editor Autonomous Software-Defined Radio Receivers for Deep Space Applications Jon Hamkins and Marvin K. Simon, Editors Low-Noise Systems in the Deep Space Network Macgregor S. Reid, Editor Coupled-Oscillator Based Active-Array Antennas Ronald J. Pogorzelski and Apostolos Georgiadis Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRAJECTORY DESIGN Jeffrey S. Parker and Rodney L. Anderson Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California July 2013 iv Low-Energy Lunar Trajectory Design July 2013 Jeffrey Parker: I dedicate the majority of this book to my wife Jen, my best friend and greatest support throughout the development of this book and always.
    [Show full text]
  • AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
    DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference July 31 ‐ August 4, 2011 Girdwood, Alaska AAS General Chair AIAA General Chair Ryan P. Russell William Todd Cerven Georgia Institute of Technology The Aerospace Corporation AAS Technical Chair AIAA Technical Chair Hanspeter Schaub Brian C. Gunter University of Colorado Delft University of Technology DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Cover images: Top right: Conference Location: Aleyska Resort in Girdwood Alaska. Middle left: Cassini looking back at an eclipsed Saturn, Astronomy picture of the day 2006 Oct 16, credit CICLOPS, JPL, ESA, NASA; Middle right: Shuttle shadow in the sunset (in honor of the end of the Shuttle Era), Astronomy picture of the day 2010 February 16, credit: Expedition 22 Crew, NASA. Bottom right: Comet Hartley 2 Flyby, Astronomy picture of the day 2010 Nov 5, Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, UMD, EPOXI Mission DRAFT version: 7/15/2011 11:04 AM http://www.alyeskaresort.com Table of Contents Registration ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Schedule of Events ................................................................................................................................... 6 Conference Center Layout ........................................................................................................................ 7 Conference Location: The Hotel Alyeska ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January / February 2010
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY ISSUE 1 VOLUME 49 SPACE TIMES • January/February 2010 1 AAS OFFICERS PRESIDENT Frank A. Slazer, Northrop Grumman EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Lyn D. Wigbels, RWI International Consulting Services JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2010 VICE PRESIDENT–TECHNICAL Srinivas R. Vadali, Texas A&M University VICE PRESIDENT–PROGRAMS Kathy J. Nado ISSUE 1–VOLUME 49 VICE PRESIDENT–PUBLICATIONS David B. Spencer, Penn State University VICE PRESIDENT–STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH Mary Lynne Dittmar, Dittmar Associates VICE PRESIDENT–MEMBERSHIP Patrick McKenzie, Ball Aerospace T H E M A G A Z I N E O F T H E A M E R I C A N A S T R O N A U T I C A L S O C I E T Y VICE PRESIDENT–EDUCATION Angela Phillips Diaz VICE PRESIDENT–FINANCE Carol S. Lane, Ball Aerospace VICE PRESIDENT–INTERNATIONAL Clayton Mowry, Arianespace, Inc. VICE PRESIDENT–PUBLIC POLICY Peggy Finarelli, George Mason University/CAPR LEGAL COUNSEL Franceska O. Schroeder, Fish & Richardson P.C. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James R. Kirkpatrick, AAS PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 3 AAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEATURES TERM EXPIRES 2010 Linda Billings, George Washington University Martian Caves May Enable Sustainable Human Ronald J. Birk, Northrop Grumman Rebecca L. Griffin, GriffinSpace LLC Exploration of the Red Planet 4 Hal E. Hagemeier, National Security Space Office The ACCESS Mars report, written by a group of young space professionals Dennis Lowrey, General Dynamics Molly Kenna Macauley, Resources for the Future from the International Space University, tells the tale. Erin Neal, ATK by ACCESS Mars Team (ISU SSP09) Lesa B.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscientific Research Global Positioning System
    Geoscientific Research and the Global Positioning System Recent Developments and Future Prospects A Report of the University Navstar Consortium Summer, 1994 ii Contents 1 Overview . 1 1.1 State of the Art . 2 1.1.1 Complex Deformation in Plate Boundary Zones. 2 1.1.2 Capturing Earthquakes . 2 1.1.3 Continuously Operating GPS Networks . 4 1.1.4 Volcano Monitoring. 4 1.1.5 Post-Glacial Rebound . 5 1.1.6 Global Climate Change . 5 1.1.7 Ocean Circulation . 6 1.1.8 Atmospheric Sensing . 6 1.1.9 Space-Based GPS Meteorology . 7 1.1.10 Probing the Ionosphere . 7 1.2 The Future . 7 1.2.1 Permanently Operating Networks . 7 1.2.2 Multipurpose National Network . 8 1.2.3 Global Change Research . 8 1.2.4 Space-Based Meteorology . 9 2 Contributors to This Report . 9 3 UNAVCO. 9 4 Scientific Opportunities . 11 4.1 Deformation of the Earth’s Lithosphere . 11 4.1.1 Plate Boundary Processes . 12 4.1.1.1 Mantle Dynamics and Tibet . 14 4.1.1.2 The Pacific-North American Transform Boundary . 14 4.1.1.3 Complexity of Continental Convergence in the Eastern Mediterranean . 14 4.1.1.4 Southeast Asia and Indonesia Tectonics . 17 4.1.1.5 The Interior Western U.S. and the Transition to the Stable Plate Interior . 18 4.1.2 Volcanic Processes . 20 4.1.2.1 Kilauea . 22 4.1.2.2 The Yellowstone Caldera . 23 4.2 The Earthquake Cycle . 24 4.2.1 Loma Prieta . 26 4.3 Deep Earth and Whole Earth Applications .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Book Abstracts List
    Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 8 – 11 October 2013 Millennium Harvest House Hotel 1345 28th Street Boulder, Colorado, USA Abstracts Book Abstracts list Keynote Session: Science Results from Satellite Altimetry • - Earth's energy imbalance and implications for ocean heat content – Trenberth • - Jason-1 : three successful phases of ocean monitoring – Morrow et al. • - Meso-submesoscale dynamics and their impact on sea-level: overview of recent studies and future perspectives – Klein • - IPCC Assessment: Sea Level and Oceanography - Ocean Observations of Climate Change: Overview of the IPCC 5th Assessment Report – Chambers - Understanding and Projecting Sea Level Change: An Overview of the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5) – Nerem et al. • - SARAL/AltiKa: a Ka band altimetric mission – Verron et al. • - SWOT mission design for advancing mesoscale oceanography – Fu et al. Oral Session: Instrument Processing Part 1 1 - Bifrequency radiometer for Ka band altimetry mission: issues and way of improving retrieval algorithms – Obligis et al. 2 - AltiKa Radiometer: first results of in-flight calibration – Frery et al. 3 - Comparison of Retrieval Algorithms for the Wet Tropospheric Path Delay – Thao et al. Part 2 1 - AltiKa in-flight performances – Steunou et al. 2 - One and Two-Dimensional Wind Speed Models for Ka-band Altimetry – Lillibridge et al. 3 - Assessing sea state bias correction models for differing frequencies and missions – Vandemark et al. Others 1 - A generalized semi-analytical model for delay/Doppler altimetry and its estimation algorithms – Halimi et al. 2 - CryoSat-2 SAR mode over ocean: one year of data quality assessment – Boy et al. 3 - Validation of Open-Sea CRYOSAT-2 Data in SAR Mode in the German Bight Area – Dinardo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Invisible by Mark Whalen Environmental Disaster Tracked by Methane Detectors
    FEBRUARY Jet Propulsion 2016 Laboratory VOLUME 46 NUMBER 2 Seeing the invisible By Mark Whalen Environmental disaster tracked by methane detectors JPL is playing a key role in tracking JPL airborne instruments a major methane leak at the Aliso Can- have measured a methane yon natural gas storage facility north of Los Angeles. leak at Aliso Canyon. Using infrared cameras, the Environ- mental Defense Fund determined the leak has released 150 million pounds of methane into the environment since its discovery in October. Methane, a greenhouse gas, can be 25 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at trap- ping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. NASA aircraft toting JPL’s Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) and Hyper Spectral Thermal Emission Spectrometer (HyTES) have been studying the leak. “Methane is “The aircraft provide a snapshot of construct how the Earth’s atmosphere invisible but these instruments are what methane gas plumes look like at moves in four dimensions.” able to see the concentrated plumes a given moment in time,” said Duren. Answers aren’t straightforward. Is of strong emission sources,” said JPL “But to interpret these observations, there a single plume of methane being researcher Riley Duren. we employ computer models to re- Continued on page 2 Ocean satellite working well By Mark Whalen Two JPL instruments are onboard Jason 3 Several weeks into their orbital mis- JPL manages Jason 3 and has pro- sion, the two JPL instruments on the vided a microwave radiometer and Jason 3 satellite have quickly begun GPS receiver for the mission, which producing valuable data on sea levels will begin full science operations after around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, February 14-18 Napa, CA
    th 26 AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, February 14-18 Napa, CA AAS General Chair Dr. Martin T. Ozimek Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory AIAA General Chair Ms. Angela Bowes NASA Langley Research Center AAS Technical Chair Dr. Renato Zanetti NASA Johnson Space Center AIAA Technical Chair Image courtesy: www.nasa.gov Dr. Ryan Russell University of Texas as Austin 2/11/2016 FINAL VERSION 26TH AAS/AIAA SPACE FLIGHT MECHANICS MEETING CONFERENCE INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION Welcome to the 26th Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, hosted by the American Astronautical Society (AAS) and co-hosted by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), February 14 – 18, 2016 (https://www.facebook.com/AAS-Space-Flight-Mechanics-Committee-1275373679142776/ on social media). This meeting is organized by the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Committee and the AIAA Astrodynamics Technical Committee, and held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 1075 California Boulevard, Napa, CA 94559, (707)-253-9540, http://www.embassysuitesnapahotel.com/. REGISTRATION Registration Site ( https://www.xcdsystem.com/aas/index.cfm ) In order to encourage early registration, we have implemented the following conference registration rate structure: Register by December 31, 2015 and save $70! Category Early Registration Registration Walk-up Registration (through Dec 31, 2015) (beginning Jan 1, 2016) (beginning Feb 1, 2016) Full - AAS or AIAA $525 $595 $695 Member Full - Non-member $625 $695 $795 Retired or Student* - $220 $290 $390 Member Retired or Student* - $320 $390 $490 Non-member *does not include proceedings CD Refunds will be issued in full until January 31, 2016. A 10% fee will be assessed for all refunds issued after that date and until 8:00 am PST February 15, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Biographies
    “Facing the Security Challenge” 6th Annual Space Traffic Management Conference University of Texas at Austin Engineering and Education Research Center (EER) James J. and Miriam B. Mulva Conference Center (0.904) February 19-20, 2020 Conference Biographies Asha Balakrishnan has expertise in evaluation for research and training programs, space policy, and STEM education. Some of her projects at the Institute for Defense Analysis, Science and Technology Policy Institute include policy research for space situational awareness and small satellites, evaluation of a Federal scholarship program and portfolio analyses for large research facilities and mid-scale facilities. She has worked in the area of metric development and assessment across a number of topics including cyber research, technology transfer, and STEM education/workforce programs. Dr. Balakrishnan holds a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign. Both her MS and PhD are in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ulpia Elena Botezatu is a researcher in the field of security and defense and assistant to the project manager of SCIPRO - Space Critical Infrastructure at ROSA, a project that aims to develop research capabilities in the sphere of critical space infrastructure protection. She is also a representative of Romania NATO Science and Technology Organization in working groups and activities that aim at developing the concept of resilience for NATO space operations, as well as in the International Space Academy in Working Group 5.13 - "Space as Critical Infrastructure." In addition, Botezatu is a delegate in both Steering and Security Committees of the EU Space Surveillance and Tracking Consortium and to European Space Agency Space Situational Awareness Programme Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation Data Messages Overview
    Report Concerning Space Data System Standards NAVIGATION DATA MESSAGES OVERVIEW INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 500.2-G-2 GREEN BOOK April 2020 Report Concerning Space Data System Standards NAVIGATION DATA MESSAGES OVERVIEW INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 500.2-G-2 GREEN BOOK April 2020 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING NAVIGATION DATA MESSAGES OVERVIEW AUTHORITY Issue: Informational Report, Issue 2 Date: April 2020 Location: Washington, DC, USA This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and reflects the consensus of technical panel experts from CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for review and authorization of CCSDS Reports is detailed in Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS A02.1-Y-4). This document is published and maintained by: CCSDS Secretariat National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC, USA Email: [email protected] CCSDS 500.2-G-2 Page i April 2020 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING NAVIGATION DATA MESSAGES OVERVIEW FOREWORD This CCSDS report, Navigation Data Messages Overview, contains background and explanatory material to supplement the CCSDS Recommended Standards for spacecraft navigation data. The document presents the conceptual framework and rationale for the exchange of navigation data, the definitions and conventions associated with inter-Agency cross-support situations involving the transfer of navigation data, as well as current and envisioned CCSDS Navigation Data Messages. Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or modification of this document may occur. This Report is therefore subject to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS A02.1-Y-4).
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Johnson Space Center Oral History Project
    EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE AT 20 ORAL HISTORY PROJECT EDITED ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT BYRON D. TAPLEY INTERVIEWED BY REBECCA WRIGHT AUSTIN, TEXAS – JANUARY 12, 2010 WRIGHT: Today is January 12, 2010. This oral history with Dr. Byron Tapley is being conducted in Austin, Texas for the NASA Headquarters Earth System Science at 20 Oral History Project. This interview is part of a series that is gathering experiences from those who significantly were involved in the efforts to launch and foster the concept of Earth System Science. Interviewer is Rebecca Wright, assisted by Sandra Johnson. Thank you again for finding time in your busy, busy schedule to talk with us today. We’d like for you to start by telling us how you first got involved in your field of expertise. TAPLEY: My introduction into the space research field came as Sputnik was launched in [October 4, 1957]. I had just finished my academic work, accepted an appointment at the University of Texas [UT, Austin, Texas] in the field of Engineering Mechanics, after performing my doctoral research on the plastic deformations of materials under high strain rates. When the Sputnik was launched, the university decided that it would be appropriate to introduce a space-related course in aerospace engineering. I was approached by the Chair of the Aeronautics Department about teaching the course. I decided that, if I were going to make this change, I wanted to develop a complete program, rather than just one course. The university agreed that I would develop a program in the field of astrodynamics, as a part of what became the aerospace engineering department.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendix A: Technical Exhibits
    APPENDICES APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL EXHIBITS SESSION II The Technical Exhibits Session was a unique opportunity to observe displays and dem- onstrations of state-of-the-art hardware, design and analysis tools, and services applica- ble to advancement of guidance, navigation, and control technology. The latest commer- cial tools for GN&C simulations, analysis, and graphical displays were demonstrated in a hands-on, interactive environment, including lessons learned and undocumented fea- tures. Associated papers not presented in other sessions were also provided and could be discussed with the authors. Local Chairpersons: Kristen Francis Lockheed Martin Space Systems Meredith Larson Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp The Technical Exhibits did not consist of formal written text, and therefore papers for this session were not available for publication. The following papers and paper numbers were not available for publication, or were not assigned: AAS 11-021 to -030 1021 APPENDIX B: CONFERENCE PROGRAM PROGRAM Becky Petteys, (MathWorks ) th 36 ANNUAL AAS GUIDANCE & 13-005 GRAVMOD2: A New Tool for Precise CONTROL CONFERENCE Gravitational Modelling of Planetary Moons February 1 to February 6, 2013 and Small Bodies, Zuccarelli, V. (Astos Breckenridge, Colorado Solutions, Germany), Cadenas, R.(GMV, Spain), Huertas, I. (ESTEC, European Space Beaver Run Conference Center Agency), Weikert, S. (Astos Solutions, Germany), Astos Solutions, GMV, (ESTEC ESA) FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1ST Room check-in at the Beaver Run Resort Local Chairperson front desk 4:00 PM daily. Michael Osborne, Lockheed Martin Space Systems, [email protected], 303- Conference registration 977-5867 Friday 5:00 to 8:00 PM Daily 6:30 to 10:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 2ND Session 0……………….7:00-10:00 AM daily 7am Conference Opening POSTER SESSION by Lisa Hardaway AVAILABLE EVERY DAY The Poster Session will be available for viewing Session I……………………..7:10-10:30 AM every day and authors will be on hand to discuss their projects and answer questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Memoir. a Working Draft
    1 Informal Memoir. A Working Draft 2 Carl Wunsch∗ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA 02138 email: [email protected] 3 August 26, 2021 4 1Introductory 1 5 This sketch memoir was originally stimulated by a podcast interview of me by Michael White 6 (16 May 2018), geoscience editor of Nature. He asked some questions about my life and career 7 that I hadn’t thought would interest anyone else. But I then thought to record them in writing 8 before my memory goes altogether. If anyone feels obligated to write a memorial of my work, 9 maybe it will be of some assistance. As an overview, my life is almost a cliche of the story of 10 Jewish immigrants to the US circa 1900, and their striving for success via their children and 11 grandchildren in the professions, academic, and otherwise. An earlier, condensed, version of 12 this memoir was published by Annual Review of Marine Science (2021). At best, much of what 13 follows will likely be of interest only to my immediate family. To some extent, my life has 14 been boringly simple: I’ve had one wife, one job, two rewarding children, and apart from short 15 intervals such as sabbaticals, have lived for over 60 years in one city. 16 Parents 17 My parents were both the children of recent immigrants. My mother, Helen Gellis, was 18 born in 1910 Dover NJ the daughter of Morris Gellis and Minnie Bernstein Gellis who had 19 emigrated from near Vilna, Lithuania and near Minsk in White Russia respectively around 20 1908.
    [Show full text]