Social security for all: Trade union policies
Labour Education 2006/4 No. 145
Contents
Editorial V Social security for all – A human right must become reality, by Guy Ryder 1 The current pension debate for trade unionists: A brief canvass of the issues, by Bob Baldwin 9 Social security for all: Investing in global social and economic development, by Michael Cichon 21 Challenges of old-age security reform in developing and transition countries: A trade union perspective, by Peter Bakvis 37 Addressing the bases of insecurity of the Philippine social security system, by Melisa R. Serrano 43 The role of trade unions in reforming social security and pensions in Ghana, by David Kwabla Dorkenoo 53 SEWA’s health insurance programme, by Mittal Shah and Tara Sinha 61 New challenges for social protection in the European Union, by Maria Jepsen and Janine Leschke 69 Pension reform in Austria and the role of trade unions, by Eva Belabed 83 Reforming the Romanian state pension system and the role of trade unions, by Petru Sorin Dandea 93 Pension reform and trade unions in the Slovak Republic, by Mária Svorenˇová 99 Trade union role in the Slovenian pension system, by Metka Roksandic´ 109
III
Editorial
his issue of Labour Education focuses on unions and their role in de- Tveloping social security policies, particularly protecting and reform- ing national pension systems. Included are several country studies by union activists which describe the reforms, challenges and union cam- paigns surrounding pension systems in their countries. The context for these country studies and the other articles in this issue is the joint ILO, European Commission and Government of Portugal World Conference “Social protection and inclusion: Converging efforts from a global per- spective”, held in Lisbon in October 2006. The conference was part of the ILO’s current campaign globally to im- plement universal social protection. An article by the ILO’s Social Security Department refl ects the analysis provided to the world conference: that the public provision of pensions is an effective and affordable method of alleviating poverty. The country studies in this issue were presented at a workshop of the Global Union Research Network (GURN) which followed the world conference. The GURN (www.gurn.info) is a platform for trade union- ists and researchers dealing with the challenges of globalization from a labour perspective. It is a cooperative project of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD (TUAC), the Global Union Federations (GUFs), the ILO’s In- ternational Institute for Labour Studies (IILS) and the ILO’s Bureau for Workers’ Activities (ACTRAV). Most of the articles in this edition of Labour Education focus on age pensions and the issues surrounding their reform, in both the develop- ing and industrialized world. The industrialized world usually operates a complementary scheme of an income replacement, contributory 1 pension system underpinned by some form of safety net of pension support for those without a qualifying history of employment or pension contribu- tions. In contrast, for most in the developing world age pensions are, or would be if they existed, simply a form of essential poverty alleviation. In practice, however, age pensions are rare in many developing countries except for civil service workers. Over the past decades paid employment has been growing in most industrialized countries, but an increasing number of workers are not engaged in a long-term employment relationship. In the industrialized world there is a declining proportion of workers in standard forms of employment, and associated with this there is a trend of more workers not being covered by contributory pensions and other social insurances. With women disproportionately represented in precarious employment, there are serious gender implications in this trend.
V In the developing world the wide spread of informality in the labour market is a major obstacle for extending the coverage of social security through payroll contributions. Many articles in this edition discuss the impact of demographics on the fi nancial sustainability of their country’s pension schemes, but so too is the size of precarious and informal employ- ment having its impact. Extending social security is impossible by merely increasing the tax burden of the formal sector: precarious and informal employment undermines the potential of contributory pension schemes as mechanisms of universal social protection. Having their origins in pension schemes for certain professional groups, these schemes have evolved to now cover the entire workforce. Today some proponents of universal social pension schemes argue that comparatively generous employment-based pension schemes which bene- fi t a select proportion in the workforce exist at the expense of a more egalitarian distribution of pension benefi ts to all in the community. It is further argued that unions protect their members’ entitlements to the detriment of the community at large. However asking for burden sharing between the very poor and the poor is most likely to be neither a viable nor a fair solution. The provision of social security to all is a responsi- bility of the whole society. Singling out the pension provisions of one group of the population as a funding source for a universal pension is a very arbitrary approach to identifying the required fi nancial resources. Progressive taxation of the entire wealth in a nation is a much fairer and transparent approach to provide resources to fi ght poverty through uni- versal basic social security. Social solidarity does ask that persons with higher incomes in so- ciety fi nance a larger part of the social benefi ts of another group. The experience in the industrialized world is that a combination of contribu- tory pensions and a universal tax fi nanced safety net pension is a viable combination of solidarity and individual responsibility to protect against old-age poverty and to move towards income security in older age. Trade unions are often pursuing in parallel the twin objectives of extending so- cial security coverage and securing decent living standards for retirees. However, with changing patterns of work, pension schemes need to be restructured to provide protection for a more hetergeneous workforce. International conventions and standards, particularly the ILO’s Dec- laration of Philadelphia, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 1952 (No. 102), es- tablish the right of all to social security and express the responsibility of national governments and the international community to guarantee that right in practice. Unions have been and are agents for social change towards greater equity through their ability to mobilize working people and bring pressure upon government to afford citizens their human right to social security. Today unions face the challenge of how to continue to pressure government and employers in an environment where free mar- ket reforms have increased in social inequality and shifted economic risk to the individual worker. It is diffi cult to defend and promote pension systems based on stand- ard employment relationships and intergenerational solidarity if a grow- ing number of younger workers are in precarious employment with little hope of earning suffi cient pension entitlements themselves. There is a
VI need for unions to organize and represent workers in non-standard em- ployment and to ensure that they are not excluded from social security. This raises the question of the policies pursued by trade unions. In the longer term social security for all is clearly a desirable outcome for trade unions as representative organizations, because it shifts the balance of power in the labour market in favour of workers. But in the shorter term the special interest of trade union members might in some cases confl ict with these wider social policy needs. Unions are and have been most successful as agents for social equity and equal opportunity. This role came about through combining advo- cacy on behalf of their immediate members’ interests with the needs of working people as a whole. The pressure that unions can bring to bear on governments in the pursuit of the basic human right of universal social security is a measure of the extent to which unions can mobilize all the potential benefi ciaries of that right. With a signifi cant proportion of the world’s workforce being in the informal economy, the challenge is how unions can better represent and mobilize informal workers. We live in societies where the term “working people” now represents a broader spectrum of self-employed workers, piece workers, independent contractors and “consultants”, as well as employees. And employees are themselves engaged in a variety of traditional and non-standard employ- ment types. All of these people are subject to selling their labour in the “labour” market, all would benefi t from the solidarity of collective action and representation, and all have a right to social security. Suffi cient funding is a key problem of ensuring that social security becomes a human right in reality. However, calculations by the ILO have shown that most countries can afford basic social security for all. It is often not a question of resources per se, but of effi cient, fair and economically sound mechanisms of resource collection. This requires a constant debate in society about the best forms of fi nancing and providing social secur- ity. The answers change over time as societies themselves change. If and where contributory systems are failing to ensure universality then an ex- amination of national tax systems may provide solutions. This is particu- larly true when there is now increasing evidence that contributory social insurance deters workers and employers from formally declaring their activities. Funding mechanisms which incorporate the informal economy, such as “user pays” systems, licence fees, wealth or consumption taxes, could be explored and debated by unions. Guy Ryder, General Secretary of the International Trade Union Con- federation, makes the case in support of social security. In the face of some of the ideological and economic forces driving globalization, and despite the international standards which underpin social security as a human right, it remains necessary to argue and explain the multifarious benefi ts of social security. He notes its many facets: it is a human right; it protects people from fear and insecurity; is an instrument to strengthen gender equality; is a pillar of democracy; creates fairer labour markets and increases fl exibility; contributes to development; and benefi ts the wider public good. In her article, Melisa Serrano of the University of Philippines School of Labor and Industrial Relations, describes the efforts of the Philippine Social Security System to increase the participation of informal economy
VII workers, employers and the self-employed. She highlights the importance of making contribution mechanisms physically accessible, even to the extent of ensuring that Overseas Filipino Workers are able to contribute towards their pensions. The experience of the Philippines is that increased accessibility, coupled with an emphasis on reducing contribution avoid- ance by employers, has created the capacity for higher benefi ts. David Kwabla Dorkenoo of the Ghana Trades Union Congress outlines the pension reform process currently underway in his country, which will see a three-pillar system introduced. The history to these changes lay in dissatisfaction with the functioning and benefi ts under the various contributory pension systems. However, this article highlights the gap between contributory systems and universal systems. Ghana has a for- mal economy of only 10 per cent of the working population, representing 90 per cent of people without access to pensions. The Ghana Trades Union Congress is making attempts to broaden its representation within the informal economy by creating Labour Enterprise Trust. Union members contribute to a trust which is then used to create employment projects and insurance schemes, thus expanding formal employment and expanding the ability of unions to represent people from the informal economy. The focus of the article by Mittal Shah and Tara Sinha of the Self-em- ployed Women’s Association (SEWA), India, is on SEWA’s health insur- ance scheme for self-employed workers in the informal economy. With around 90,000 women insured, with a further 80,000 other family mem- bers also covered, it represents a signifi cant system of social protection. In 1972 SEWA started organizing self-employed women for their economic rights, and now boasts 796,000 members from the informal economy. The association established banking services for its members before it ex- panded into health services, noting the risk to fi nancial security from ill-health. In the boxed section at the end of their article, Mittal Shah and Tara Sinha describe the current campaign for national social security legislation launched by SEWA and other unions representing informal economy workers. This is a clear example of the potential for unions to mobilize these workers in the pursuit of human rights. Petru Sorin Dandea, Vice-president of the Romanian National Trade Union Confederation, Cartel Alfa, sets out in his article the diffi culties faced in transforming the communist-era state pension system to deal with the post-communist environment. The main problem was that the pension system became a de facto unemployment benefi ts scheme, with workers allowed to retire early in order to deal with the high rates of unemployment in the early 1990s. During the 1990s benefi ciary numbers rose nearly 100 per cent while contributor numbers nearly halved. Again, along with unemployment (or early retirement) the growth of the infor- mal economy contributed to the drop in contributors and consequent fi s- cal imbalance. Following reforms to deal with the lack of sustainability of the scheme, the Romanian pension system, based on social insurance contributions from employers and employees, still faces a dependency ratio of about 1. Petru Sorin Dandea notes the estimates that there are 2 million people [out of a workforce of 9.3 million (Ed.)] who do not con- tribute to the scheme. The two articles by Mária Svorenˇová of the Trade Unions Confeder- ation of the Slovak Republic and Metka Roksandic´ of the Association of
VIII Free Trade Unions of Slovenia both detail the pressures upon pension systems in European transition countries. Both systems were inherited from the communist era and provided universal coverage. However, the pension systems in the two countries faced budgetary pressure during the transitional phase of the 1990s. The established systems of social dia- logue gave unions in both countries a strong voice in dealing with these reforms, and unions were the main social actors in campaigning for better protections in the reform process. Eva Belabed, of the Chamber of Labour, Upper Austria, articulates many of the economic pressures and social trends impacting on Euro- pean pension systems, mostly due to globalization, noting that “…we fi nd ourselves in a process which aims at reversing the historical consensus in many European countries about the participation of all in the deci- sions and the wealth of society”. Demographic change and the consequent threat to the sustainability of pension schemes are often the catalysts for reforming pensions. However, as Eva Belabed discusses, the reforms often go beyond the necessity to address demographics and sustainability and venture into ideological-driven reforms. The obvious example of this is the privatization of pensions, motivated by the desire to benefi t the markets and business. Other examples are the introduction of individ- ual pension accounts and non-defi ned benefi t schemes, that drive the intergenerational solidarity which has underpinned European pension schemes for decades. But the individualism inherent in these models has a deeper worrying consequence, as touched on by the citation above. Workers are divorced from control of their assets as they are shifted into privatized schemes which leave them, individually and collectively, with a mere commercial relationship with their retirement assets and no polit- ical infl uence. The impact of globalization is noted as infl uencing a convergence of social protection spending within the European Union. In their article, Maria Jepsen and Janine Leschke of the European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety, discuss the catch-up in per capita GDP spending by the newer EU members, while the more established economies have moderated their spending, partly due to in- creased economic competition within Europe. However, they note that there remains a commitment within the EU to the welfare model. At the same time “solidarity” as the basis of the welfare model appears to be changing. Rather than the emphasis being on solidarity between groups in society, Maria Jepsen and Janine Leschke discuss the concept of “com- petitive solidarity”, where the collective welfare of Europe is based on the “joint competitive and productive success” of Europe. Bob Baldwin of the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD, and Peter Bakvis, Director, ITUC/Global Unions – Washington Offi ce, have produced articles which canvass a broad spectrum of issues sur- rounding pension policy and the debates that engage unions. Bob Bald- win gives an overview of the differing models being employed around the world, their limitations and advantages, and posits this within the central trade union concern about “whether they can provide adequate incomes to the largest possible number of people”. Peter Bakvis frames his response to the ILO discussion paper mentioned at the outset of this editorial, a shorter version of which is contained in this publication. In
IX noting the ILO has taken “head-on” the World Bank’s three-pillar model, he analyses the role the World Bank’s ideological adventure has had in undermining the capacity of national governments and workers to retain control over pension policy, and how this continues despite the Bank’s own analysis of the shortcomings, in practice, of the three-pillar model.
Jim Baker Director ILO Bureau for Workers’ Activities
Note
1 The term “contributory” refers to the range of pension systems which are funded through work-related contributions, generally from both the employer and employee, in- cluding pay-as-you-go, social insurance, privatized capital funded, etc., and for which benefi ts are dependent on a history of employment and/or contributions, as distinct from schemes funded from budgetary sources and tax income.
Special thanks go to Tim Wallace who edited and coordinated preparation for this issue of Labour Education.
X Social security for all – A human right must become reality
This article discusses the ethical imperative and economic case for social security, the challenges facing the extension of social protec- tion coverage, and the policies the trade union movement sees as necessary to move towards social security for all as a core element for decent work and decent lives. It notes that social policies are a question of political will and are only sustainable if they are based on a stable consensus.
Guy Ryder General Secretary International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC)
“There is enough for everybody’s need, but not enough for everybody’s greed.” MAHATMA GANDHI
umans have developed the capacity abilities – compete on equal terms leads to Hto produce goods and services to very unequal outcomes that do not meet such a degree that no one need endure any criteria of social justice. hunger or malnutrition. The barriers to Survival of the fi ttest is the law of the achieving this objective are institutional market. What is called “competitive crea- and political. tive destruction” generates success and Equality before the law is not enough hardship simultaneously where the win- to address the inequalities and injustice in ner takes all. This is deeply polarizing and today’s world. The French writer Anatole does not meet the common understanding France captured the limitation of this clas- of justice, in particular if the different start- sical liberal concept in a single sentence: ing conditions are taken into account. Un- “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids limited market competition forces around rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, 1.3 billion people,1 including more than beg in the streets or steal bread.” 200 million children,2 to work for wages People start unequal in life: billions are below the poverty line. born into poverty while others grow up in In light of the above concerns, this more privileged families. Many have little article discusses the ethical imperative access to formal education, some are hand- and economic case for social security, the icapped and not everyone has the same challenges facing the extension of social ability to learn and work. Some are also protection coverage, and the policies the suffering from chronic illness – but oth- trade union movement sees as necessary ers are lucky and rarely need any medical to move towards social security for all as treatment. Some inherit property; others a core element for decent work and de- are advantaged by being exceptionally in- cent lives. telligent, good-looking or athletic. In most The fi rst priority must be to put an countries it makes a difference if you are a end to poverty. Solidarity and adequate man or a woman. Making people – despite taxation at local, national and interna- their very different starting conditions and tional levels can mobilize the necessary
1 resources to meet the basic needs of all ment in conditions of freedom and dignity, of people. Effi cient social protection systems economic security and equal opportunity; can ensure that those who cannot work All national and international policies and themselves out of poverty are not left measures, in particular those of an economic behind. Universal access to food, water, and fi nancial character, should be judged in health, shelter and education is key for de- this light and accepted only in so far as they velopment; a basic income fl oor is needed may be held to promote and not to hinder the to ensure a bottom line against poverty. achievement of this fundamental objective. Social justice requires basic social ser- vices, reduction of inequalities of opportu- This moral consensus has not yet material- nities, a basic income fl oor for everyone and ized in practice and too many people are special care for those who are disadvan- suffering from poverty and insecurity. They taged by disabilities or social conditions. lack adequate health care, access to educa- In many industrialized countries today tion, child benefi ts and basic income secur- the discussions focus on adapting and ity. Too many governments seem to be un- modernizing the welfare state. These are able or unwilling to collect suffi cient taxes complicated and controversial processes or to spend the money prudently to fulfi l for trade unions also. However, in this art- their minimum obligations towards their icle I want to focus on a more fundamental citizens. It is often the lack of democracy issue: how to extend social security to those that allows governments to ignore the poor, who have hardly any or no social security and it is brutal poverty that deprives people at all. Nearly 60 years ago, in a much poorer of the ability to make their voice heard. world, the principle for universal social se- Maybe one reason is that the costs of curity was already laid out in the Universal social security appear directly in public Declaration of Human Rights:3 budgets while the benefi ts are much more diffi cult to trace. How much growth does a Everyone, as a member of society, has the right dollar invested in health, education or safe to social security and is entitled to realization, working conditions generate? How do we through national effort and international co- value an increase in life expectancy? operation and in accordance with the organ- However, trade unions have no illu- ization and resources of each State, of the eco- sions that the lack of social security is nomic, social and cultural rights indispensable merely a lack of knowledge or enlighten- for his dignity and the free development of his ment. Social security is a contested terrain. personality. In many instances trade unions and work- ers had to fi ght hard for social protection All modern societies in one way or the despite the fact that it has been essential for other recognize the need for basic social development. There is hardly any social re- protection. Only a few marginal, but some- form that has not been opposed by vested times vocal, ultra-liberals are questioning interests. Entrepreneurs, landowners and this. Social security is, indeed, recognized other members of the economic elite were as a right enshrined in the most important not and, often are not, prepared to share human rights instruments. It is not charity more fairly the wealth and income that has for the poor, but a right, a claim that citi- been created or to concede their economic zens can make against the State. Following power, which is stronger when workers are the bitter experience of the world economic living under the permanent threat of un- crisis and the horror of the Second World employment, poverty and insecurity. War, the ILO’s Declaration of Philadelphia Social policies are a question of polit- in 1944 proclaimed:4 ical will. The level of development is an important factor, but even more important All human beings, irrespective of race, creed is the balance of power in a society. In all or sex, have the right to pursue both their ma- societies and at all levels of development terial well-being and their spiritual develop- there are diverging views about how much
2 social security is necessary, desirable and quality of life if medical treatment is avail- affordable. Critics of redistributive pol- able, children go to school instead of work icies argue that these policies aim at equal and old people retire in decency. outcomes despite unequal efforts and tax hard-working people to support welfare thefts. But except for some ultra-egalitar- An instrument to strengthen ian radicals no one is suggesting equal- gender equality ity of outcomes and, whatever may be the problems of today’s world, they certainly A modern approach to social security of- do not include too much equality. fers an important instrument to empower Social policies are only sustainable if women by overcoming traditional patri- they are based on a stable consensus. A archal structures of families and societies. serious discussion about social security Social services and cash transfers can be for all should not waste time on the pos- designed in a way that strengthens indi- itions of ultra-libertarian or ultra-egali- vidual independence. Child benefi ts for tarian ideologues. An informed debate school attendance benefi t girls in par- should begin with identifi cation of general ticular. Pre-natal health services protect considerations and basic principles. I sug- women and child care provision is cru- gest the following. cial to enable women to re-enter the la- bour market. Pension credits for periods of raising children reduce female old age Social security: poverty. A basic non-contributory pen- Identifying key characteristics sion is an important safeguard against the transmission of labour market inequali- A human right ties into social security provisions.
To deny people access to health and edu- cation, to force people to work for less than A pillar of democracy a living wage, to accept constant malnutri- tion and deprivation: these are all viola- Meaningful democracy requires citizens tions of the universal principles of human who enjoy genuine freedom – based on dignity and respect. It is the obligation of legal, political, religious and economic any State to provide these minimal social independence. Very few people have suf- rights to its citizens. Where States fail to fi cient private property to enjoy fi nancial meet their obligations, this failure and its security in case of sickness, unemploy- consequences become a responsibility also ment, injuries and old age. In this respect for the international community. Human the common availability of social security rights are universal and it is immoral to provisions is the functional equivalent to ignore poverty just because it occurs be- suffi cient private property. Social security yond national borders. provisions strengthen the independence of people. It affords them choices. It provides workers and their families with the basic A protection from fear and insecurity security that is a precondition to be fully capable of exerting citizen rights. Millions of people in the world live in inse- curity, dependency and fear of unemploy- ment, sickness, work accidents and old age. A mechanism to create fairer labour Social security is a crucial instrument to markets and increased flexibility equip people with the basic protection and capabilities that allow them to plan their The balance of power in a labour market is lives, to make choices and take risks. It is inherently unequal. Social protection limits impossible to overestimate the increase in the power of employers to abuse or exploit
3 workers. People whose basic social rights and desperation feed crime, individuals are secured are more able to demand re- are forced to buy security privately. Even spect at the workplace. They are less likely wealthier middle classes lose quality of life to endure abuse, dangerous working con- as they retreat in “golden cages” to protect ditions and miserable pay. Social security themselves against the excluded majority. takes labour partly out of competition and A basic package of protection including rewards employers that innovate and in- health care, primary education and a basic vest in people. It is a key instrument to re- income fl oor are not seriously disputed. It duce unfair competition and avoid a race to is rather a question of how to achieve these the bottom. Trade unions support the idea modest objectives. In the public debate a that innovations and productivity gains are number of challenges for internationally rewarded with higher profi ts, but we see no applicable social standards are discussed. value in higher profi ts that are gained by Diversity of countries and local conditions, hazardous working conditions, exploitation participation of the people in the design of children or denial of decent wages. and implementation of social security sys- tems, and the tax-raising ability of nation states in a competitive global open econ- A vital tool for development omy are key issues in this respect.
Social security is an investment in peo- ple. There is ample evidence5 that coun- Universality and diversity tries can grow in equity. The argument of welfare critics of an inevitable trade-off Trade union policies are based on an in- between growth and equity is empiri- clusive concept of solidarity and advocate cally wrong and it does not become true universal social policies to improve work- through constant repetition. Social secur- ing and living conditions for all workers ity is not only compatible with growth; it and the population at large. Historically is in many instances a vital tool for devel- trade unions have often pioneered social opment. It pays to invest in public health, security provisions through collective bar- education, health and safety at the work- gaining that have subsequently been uni- place and maternity protection. A healthy versalized through legislation. Extension and educated workforce is the precondi- of social security requires a broad cross- tion for productive employment. We also society alliance in order to create the nec- know that pensions and social transfers essary political support. It improves the function as automatic stabilizers and re- bargaining position of workers in the la- duce demand volatility. Social stability is bour market and is a stepping stone for an asset that makes countries attractive for many informal economy workers to get long-term investment. some basic social rights. Although social security is a universal human right there is a huge diversity in A producer of public goods possibilities for achieving this objective. The overarching and universal principles Social security contributes to social peace need to include respect for the dignity and which benefi ts everybody, not just transfer autonomy of citizens in need, solidarity in recipients. The way to public security and sharing the costs of social security, promot- lasting social peace is through fairness, ing equality of opportunities and ensuring equal opportunities and social protection that those who are protected participate and not through more police and prisons. in the development and execution of so- What is the value of economic growth cial security policies. Societies constantly if it is invested in barbed wire, security change and social security systems have guards, walls and fences? If the social fab- to adapt continuously to maintain their ric of a society breaks down and poverty protective function. There is no one social
4 security model that could serve as a stable engaged in subsistence activities largely reference point over time. Social security outside the formal economy. systems are products of specifi c historical In such a situation, public work schemes processes and local conditions. There is will be needed that offer socially mean- bitter experience of grand design schemes ingful employment at the legal minimum that were ridiculed by government or by wage. This will give people the possibility market failure. In any country there are to earn at least the minimum wage instead traditional, cooperative, state and market of being forced to accept the worst forms of elements of social security. Each of these el- exploitation or being without any income ements needs to be judged not on the basis at all. This is an approach currently being of its organizational form but on its merit developed on a large scale in India. to contribute to the overall objective of ex- Such an approach needs to be comple- tending social security to those in need. mented with infrastructure development and a wide range of active labour market policies to create more and better jobs, and Getting the design right with social assistance or other cash transfers where others forms of support have failed. Social policies must address the needs of the Extension of social security faces not people in a way that supports the dignity only the challenge to meet the basic and and autonomy of the individual and enables urgent needs of people but also to develop people as much as possible to develop their effi cient and effective organizational and own capabilities and to strengthen their administrative structures. In the last dec- independence. A system needs to provide ades there has been an ideological battle universal basic social services and a basic to privatize social security systems. How- income fl oor, but it should be designed in a ever, the results have at best been mixed way that helps to develop income opportu- and often driven by ideology rather than nities where possible. Incentives that result reason. Instead of continuing these ideo- in a dependency culture or abuse are not logical battles I would like to reiterate the desirable. We are not talking about people pragmatic position of the trade union move- resting in a social safety net, but a right for ment. The fi rst and foremost function of so- everybody to walk with dignity and respect cial policies is the effi cient delivery of uni- on a basic social fl oor. versal social services and adequate social In any case, the extent of welfare abuse transfers at low costs, in systems leading to is in most cases highly exaggerated. It is universal coverage and based on responsi- diffi cult to see how the universal access to ble management and public accountability. health care or the provision of a basic in- In this regard, the much heralded Chilean come in the form of child benefi ts or basic privatized pension scheme has just seen its old-age pensions can set wrong behav- Waterloo – insurance companies got rich ioural incentives. Child benefi ts, in par- yet real pension rates and coverage are low ticular when linked to school attendance, and the burden on the State as provider of can in the right circumstances help reduce last resort remains high. It was an expen- child labour. Pensions are not addressing sive but sobering experience and we should the active labour force. Social security sys- learn from this, as it shows that miraculous tems need to be designed in a way that schemes that simultaneously offer high motivates and enables people to seek and profi ts for insurance companies, create dy- fi nd decent employment. But it needs to be namic capital markets, increase the level of stressed: employment that does not gen- investment and provide attractive pensions erate a living wage is not decent employ- at low costs only exist in fl awed economic ment. A legal minimum wage is an impor- textbooks and not in the real world. tant instrument to provide a basic income Pure market solutions can provide for fl oor. However, this will not be suffi cient (limited) risk pooling, but not for redistri- in countries where many workers are bution. Without redistribution coverage of
5 the poor will not be possible. It is an illu- per se, but the ability of the State to collect sion to believe that without a strong role of suffi cient taxes and to manage these funds the State either as provider or as regulator prudently. Research by the ILO has shown universal social security is possible. that only very limited resources are re- quired globally to provide basic social se- curity for all. Even in the poorest countries Public accountability and participation in Africa devoting about 4 per cent of GDP of the protected to a basic set of cash benefi ts can reduce the poverty headcount by 40 per cent.6 While technical expertise is important to Global tax competition creates pres- build viable social security systems this sure on national tax rates and reduces the should not lead to the illusion that the wis- available fi scal space. Simultaneously with dom of experts alone is the best way to an increasing interest in corporate social design and implement social security sys- responsibility, the willingness by compan- tems. Systems will not work if they are not ies to pay their fair share of taxes has been based on the values, tradition and convic- decreasing. Companies are going to great tions and participatory learning processes lengths to avoid taxes and often reorgan- of the people. The often cumbersome, con- ize themselves so as to avoid the obliga- fl ictual and contradictory process of pub- tions national law places on employers lic debate is indispensable in creating the with respect to social security. consensus that viable solutions require. It is not true that international tax ar- Workers have again and again had to rangements are impossible. In Europe bear the costs of poorly administered or governments agreed to harmonize con- badly protected public or private social sumption tax years ago. They agreed that security schemes. Schemes using partic- there should not be unfair retail competi- ularly high shares of their contributions tion through extreme differences in VAT. for administrative costs are likely to have In a similar way there is a need to prevent governance defi ciencies. This is not only unfair competition on corporate taxation bad governance but unethical enrichment. and to act jointly against tax evasion. It is The money in social security schemes is regressive to tax disproportionately con- workers’ money. It is deducted from their sumption and wages. It is not true that salaries or paid via taxes. The use of these governments cannot do anything in the resources and the administration of these face of global capital mobility. To ensure funds must be transparent and under con- a suffi cient level of fi scal revenue for so- stant public scrutiny. Those who pay as cial security a wide range of additional workers as well as those who receive bene- tax policy options are available. Further- fi ts must have a say in the governance of more public procurement policies should these resources. Resources must be avail- exclude companies that do not provide the able to enable worker representatives to re- legally required social protection to their ceive the technical training and the access workers or are found guilty of tax fraud. to expertise that they need to fulfi l their controlling function. Global challenges require global responses Creating and defending the fiscal space for social policies The protection of workers’ interests re- quires that poverty be addressed by pol- The best design and the most honest gov- icies which provide a regulatory frame- ernance of social services and social secur- work that ultimately extends social secur- ity are meaningless if the necessary fi nan- ity to all. This is possible but it will require cial resources cannot be mobilized. This is building a greater political will than exists in most societies not a question of resources currently. We need to forge a broad alliance
6 to move forward from a moral human Mexico, the “30 baht” health scheme in rights consensus on social security to fi rm Thailand, the universal basic pension legal and fi scal commitments and policies in Namibia and Lesotho, and the Na- that use the well-tested instruments of re- tional Rural Employment Guarantee Act distributive social security provision to (NREGA) in India. These pioneering ac- make poverty history. Investing in provid- tivities can contribute to a global debate ing a basic set of social security benefi ts to about the best instruments, rules and tools all the world’s poor will cost less than 2 per to extend the coverage of social security. cent of global GDP – a cost that will be paid The ILO as the responsible UN organ- back many times over through increased ization for social protection is the place productivity of the global workforce. where this debate needs to take place. The In a global economy social security can- trade union movement is an active partner not be dealt with in national isolation. in this process to build networks and alli- ances for universal social protection. The failure of any nation to adopt humane con- Social security for all is an investment ditions of labour is an obstacle in the way of in global social and economic develop- other nations which desire to improve the con- ment. Economic growth does not automat- ditions in their own countries. 7 ically lead to poverty reduction. Volun- tary charity cannot provide the necessary The best strategy to avoid a race to the bot- funds and cannot create the mutual rights tom is the creation and application of in- and obligations that are indispensable for ternational labour standards. During the social security as a concept of human general discussion on social security at the rights and personal dignity. It is govern- International Labour Conference in 2001 ments that have the ability to provide the governments, workers and employers re- framework and resources for sustainable iterated the need to “anchor the ILO activ- social security provisions. ities in social security in the Declaration of Making the human right to social se- Philadelphia, the decent work concept and curity a reality for all is a moral obligation relevant ILO social security standards.”8 at the national and international level. The This common commitment at the ILO necessary resources are globally available; is important but more political momentum it is essential for development and equity; is required to achieve a basic social protec- and it can and must be done. tion package as outlined earlier. The ILO must play a key role in building a global platform for social justice as a core element Notes of the Decent Work Agenda. Important social security standards 1 ILO, Governing Body, Implementation of the have been adopted by the ILO over the Global Employment Agenda: An update, 2007. last decades. These technical standards 2 ILO, The end of child labour: Within reach, 2006. together with the principles enshrined in 3 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, the ILO Constitution, the Declaration of Article 22. Human Rights and the International Cov- 4 Declaration of Philadelphia Art. II a and c. enant of Economic, Social and Cultural 5 “Social protection as a productive factor”, doc. Rights provide guidance and need to be GB. 294/ESP/4, 294th Session, Geneva, 2005. ratifi ed more widely. 6 ILO, Cash benefi ts in low-income countries: Simu- Recent years have seen the emergence lating the effects on poverty reduction for Senegal and of new initiatives at the national level to Tanzania, 2006. extend social security coverage, such as 7 ILO Constitution, 1919. Bolsa Familia in Brazil, Oportunidades in 8 Conclusion ILC, 2001.
7
The current pension debate for trade unionists: A brief canvass of the issues
Across the differing retirement pension models being employed around the world, the central trade union concern will always be whether a particular model can provide adequate incomes to the lar- gest possible number of people. However, where there is a significant informal economy other questions arise: whether the cost of payroll- based pension contributions discourages formal economy employ- ment and whether tax-financed universal schemes more appropriate.
Bob Baldwin Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD Paris
n the fi rst several decades following administered arrangements; and, tighten- Ithe Second World War a great deal of ing the relationship between contributions progress was made across much of the made and benefi ts received by reducing globe in putting pension arrangements in cross-subsidies. (OECD, 2000) Acting as a place, which in turn transformed for mil- central policy “think tank” for its mem- lions of workers the latter part of one’s life. ber governments, the OECD endorsed The ages-old pattern of working until one these reforms as a necessary response became disabled or died was replaced by to the combination of population ageing, a period of retirement when one could decelerating population growth and ever look forward to material comfort without earlier retirement. It viewed this combin- having to be employed and while enjoy- ation of forces as a threat to the totality of ing good health. A signifi cant period of economic growth, budgetary balances and retirement became one of the most impor- the sustainability of public pensions. tant forms in which the benefi ts of rising Outside the OECD area, the World productivity were widely shared. Trade Bank became a very active player with re- unions played a signifi cant role in bring- spect to pension reform. It focused much ing about this new state of affairs. of its attention on pay-as-you-go (PAYG) Over the course of the past decade earnings-related, publicly administered and more, the progress established in the pension plans which, in many World Bank earlier period has been eroded. In 2000, a client countries, tended to dominate pen- document prepared by the Organisation sion systems. The Bank urged that these for Economic Co-operation and Develop- programs be replaced in whole or in part ment (OECD) noted that 26 of the 29 mem- by mandatory individual savings ac- ber countries at that time had imple- counts.1 The Bank shared the OECD con- mented reforms to their pension systems cern about future budgetary balances and (OECD, 2000). Reforms included: raising also foresaw the possibility that manda- the age of eligibility for benefi ts; lengthen- tory retirement savings programs might ing the number of years over which earn- stimulate innovation in fi nancial institu- ings are averaged for purposes of calcu- tions and instruments that might encour- lating benefi ts; changing the method of age economic growth. In many of its cli- indexation from wage indexing to price ent countries, the publicly administered indexing; increasing the role of privately defi ned benefi t (DB) programmes then in
9 place suffered from any or all of limited two criteria: are incomes above a nation- coverage, fi nancial problems and poor ally recognized measure of poverty or administration. low income; and, do the incomes allow Generally speaking, the reforms of people to maintain their standard of liv- the recent past have not been welcomed ing as they move from work to retirement by trade unions. In some cases, trade and throughout the period of retirement. union movements have been somewhat Given that retirement periods have been unhappily resigned to change. In other increasing with life expectancy, the ques- cases trade union movements have been tion of how pensions are adjusted to re- prompted to initiate strikes and demon- fl ect changes in prices or wages through strations to protest proposed changes. To the retirement period is an increasingly date most of the trade union debate and important question. It is also of somewhat dialogue on pension reforms has been greater importance to women in light of conducted at a national level. their greater life expectancy, as is the ques- The general purpose of this article is tion of whether some portion of retirement to establish a basis for international trade benefi ts carry on to surviving spouses. union dialogue on pension reform. The In addition to being concerned about article reviews and comments on a number the adequacy of benefi ts, trade unions of common issues that trade union move- have also shown a concern that retirement ments are forced to address in pension income programs should have a substan- reform debates: demographic change, the tial core that is predictable. Thus, they role of publicly and privately administered have shown a widespread but not univer- pensions, defi ned benefi t (DB) versus de- sal support for DB plans over DC plans, fi ned contribution (DC) plans, and so on. and have also seen a strong positive role It also notes some of the special issues that for publicly administered plans. Although confront low-income countries. In the fi nal it has seldom been articulated, in practice section an attempt is made to articulate, at trade unions have shown a concern that a high level, a general approach to pension the pension system not be subject to con- reform for trade unionists.2 tinual change. Given the broad scope and short length The values that trade unions bring to of this article, it passes rather lightly over a bear on pension debates seem so obvious number of important issues. The treatment as to be not worth stating. Yet, part of what of pension issues in low-income countries has made the pension reform debates dif- warrants much further attention than it fi cult is that these basic considerations can be given here. are often missing from the debate. Pen- sion reform prescriptions endorsed by the OECD have tended to focus increasingly Trade union values on the supply of labour of older workers, and a murky debate and protecting budgetary balances in the future. The World Bank has shared the Not only have the outcomes of reform concern about future budgetary balances processes been awkward but the debates and the future development of fi nancial themselves have been diffi cult, in no small institutions and instruments. Whether part because they are often quite discon- one shares them or not, these objectives nected from the central concerns of trade are recognizable as being signifi cant, but unions. beside the point of why pension plans At the centre of trade union concerns exist. about pension arrangements is the ques- To the extent that the question of in- tion whether they can provide adequate come adequacy gets dealt with, it tends to incomes to the largest possible number get dealt with as a problem that has largely of people. The question of whether in- been solved in the OECD area, with only comes are adequate is assessed against subsets of the population (e.g. widows
10 and immigrants) being a source of ongo- 142 per cent between 1950 and 2000 and ing concern (OECD, 2001). This compla- is expected to grow by 49 per cent by the cency refl ects, on the one hand, the reality mid-twenty-fi rst century. that the incomes of older people in OECD There are quite different start and end countries did improve signifi cantly in points among countries and continents both absolute and relative terms in the lat- for these trends. Generally, Europe and ter part of the twentieth century (Yamada, Northern America (Canada and the United 2002). But in many countries the incomes States) start out as older populations and of retirees who have totally withdrawn remain older. But, there is a tendency to from the labour force are seldom looked convergence with respect to age structures at, and they are often well below the aver- and some of the most rapid ageing will age incomes of the elderly. Furthermore, take place in the most prosperous parts in countries with signifi cant pre-funded of East Asia (e.g. Japan, China, Republic components to the retirement income sys- of Korea and Taiwan). While population tem, the incomes that they produced in the growth will decelerate in all continents it late twentieth century were strengthened will remain more robust in less developed by: very high returns on fi nancial assets; regions. It will be negative in Europe. low infl ation and low wage growth. These Two factors underlie the ageing pro- pension arrangements will not produce cess. The fi rst is increased life expectancy the same incomes under different eco- at older ages. Again this is a worldwide nomic circumstances. development that shows signs of conver- Not only have the central concerns of gence among continents. Thus, the life trade unions tended to be pushed to the expectancy of 65-year-old European men margins of debate, but sometimes key increased by only 0.8 years between 1950 terms in the debate are left with no clear and 2000, while the average life expect- defi nition. An important case in point is ancy of Asian women increased by 5.5 the term “sustainability”, which has en- years over the same period. joyed a central place in much of the dis- The second factor is declining fertil- cussion of future pension expenditures. ity which is also happening worldwide The term is seldom if ever defi ned clearly. and in each continent, and again shows Sometimes it is implied that if future ex- signs of convergence. Worldwide, fertility penditures would require tax increases declined from 5.02 in 1950-55, to 2.65 in they are unsustainable. If earlier genera- 2000-05, and is expected to decline to 2.05 tions had adopted this approach, much in 2045-50. In 1950-55, fertility rates in less of what is now in place would have been developed regions were more than twice deemed unsustainable years ago. those in more developed regions, and by 2045-50 they are expected to be 1.13 times those in more developed regions. Demographic change A fertility rate of 2.1 is required to maintain a population. By 2000-05, Eu- Across the world and in every continent, rope and Northern America had fertility two demographic trends are underway rates below this level and Italy, Republic that are very important to the debates on of Korea and Spain had fertility rates of pension reform. Populations are getting 1.2. Africa is the only continent expected older and population growth is decelerat- to have a fertility rate above this level in ing. Thus, the portion of the global pop- 2045-50. The decline in fertility rates more ulation over 65 was 5.2 per cent in 1950, than offsets the effect of increased longev- 6.0 per cent in 2000 and is expected to be ity and accounts for the deceleration in 16.1 per cent in 2050.3 The older subsets of population growth. the over 65 populations (e.g. 75 to 84 and Many a horror story about the pen- 85 and older) will be growing even more sion burden is told around these demo- rapidly. The world population grew by graphic trends. As the retired population
11 grows in relation to the population as a countries that want to encourage more whole, it is true that the share of national employment of older workers should un- income claimed by the elderly will grow dertake a vigorous effort to increase em- too, assuming that their relative incomes ployment overall. are more or less constant. They are also likely to claim a larger share of govern- ment budgets. But, it does not follow that Balance between publicly and they impose an intolerable burden on the privately administered pensions working-age population as is sometimes alleged because several forces will offset The respective role of publicly and pri- the impact. vately administered pension arrange- First of all, it is important to remem- ments varies widely in the OECD area ber that the elderly will be claiming a (OECD, 2005). larger share of a larger per capita income. The right balance between public and In most countries, wage and productivity private arrangements is bound to be a increases of 1.0 to 1.5 per cent per year will political issue that will never be fully re- be suffi cient to keep wages net of pension solved. On the one hand, the fi nancial sec- contributions growing. These are not triv- tor will always tend to look at publicly ad- ial rates of growth, but neither are they ministered pensions as a market opportu- extreme. Moreover if population ageing nity lost. On the other hand, trade unions and decelerating population growth give and many social policy groups will have rise to labour shortages as is often sug- opening biases in favour of a strong role gested, these rates of wage and produc- for publicly administered programmes. tivity growth will be easier to achieve. There are many good reasons for the Second, the increase in the portion of trade union bias in favour of publicly ad- the population of pensioner age will be ministered programmes. They have the offset in large measure by a decline in the greatest possible risk pooling potential portion of non-working young. Thus, pub- which is vital to operating DB programs lic and private transfers from the work- and making retirement incomes predict- ing-age population to youth will be de- able. They do not require pre-funding for clining as the transfers to the elderly will purposes of insuring benefi t promises as be increasing. This can be politically dif- is typically required in privately admin- fi cult as transfers to the elderly take place istered arrangements. They can achieve largely within the public sector while administrative economies of scale and, if transfers to the young take place in pri- they are funded to some degree, they can vate households. capture effi ciencies in the investment area Finally, it is important to note that the as well. In addition, compared to an alter- actual ages of retirement have stopped native of “voluntary” workplace pensions, their downward trend in a number of they have the advantage of solving chronic countries. (Sudén, 2006) Moreover, many problems of limited coverage, portability young workers have delayed key tran- and limited protection against infl ation. sitions in the early life course (Beaujot, The coverage issue is particularly im- 2004) and, as a result, will fi nd it diffi - portant as coverage for a signifi cant part cult to retire as early as their parents and of working life is a prerequisite of end- grand-parents. ing work with a decent pension. In con- Given the persistently high unemploy- text it is worth noting that the only OECD ment in many high- and low-income coun- countries where private pension cover- tries, the greater worry in many countries age is well beyond 50 per cent of the paid would be that encouraging greater em- workforce is in countries where coverage ployment of older workers will succeed is effectively mandatory due to legislation at the expense of job opportunities for that requires it or due to collective bar- younger workers. High unemployment gaining in countries with high degrees of
12 collective bargaining coverage (Queisser power, it may not be appropriate to en- and Whitehouse, 2006). courage people to rely too heavily on a In countries where employers can major public pension programme. It may choose whether to put private pensions in be possible to develop decision-making place, it is generally labour market pres- structures that involve social partners that sures and collective bargaining that cause might mitigate this risk. them to do so. As a consequence, there is Sometimes, concern about political risk a general tendency for workers who are is embellished by concerns about corrup- vulnerable or disadvantaged in the labour tion and/or incompetence of the politicians market (e.g. women, immigrants and mi- and public offi cials who are responsible grant workers) to be less likely to be cov- for overseeing public pensions. Unfortu- ered. In recent years these long-standing nately, history has offered some support concerns have been accentuated by the for this concern. On the other hand, pri- growth in non-standard forms of employ- vate arrangements also require substantial ment (part-time and temporary contract regulation and tax support, and if public work). People who are engaged in these offi cials are too corrupt or incompetent to forms of employment are often left out manage a public programme, they prob- of voluntary private pension plans. An- ably cannot be counted on to regulate a other development of the recent past that private one effectively. is important in the Anglo-Saxon world There is also the question of whether in particular, is a growing unwillingness retirement income needs are suffi ciently of companies to sponsor DB pension ar- homogenous to allow them all to be sub- rangements. This tendency has become stantially met through one or more pub- quite extreme in some cases and raises lic programs. This issue is likely to be as- serious questions about the usefulness of sessed differently in different countries, employment as the platform for providing and may look different depending on pension benefi ts. what kinds of programs are currently in Despite the clear advantages of pub- place and/or seem plausible in the foresee- licly administered programs, there are able future. both theoretical and practical reasons why To this point, publicly administered a trade union movement might choose pensions have been referred to as if they not to propose a pension system that is are an homogenous entity. Yet there are entirely publicly administered. at least three generic types that are com- The fact that the balance between pub- monly found: lic and private provision is contested terri- 1. means or income-tested programmes; tory is always a consideration, as are pre- vailing values and beliefs. In countries 2. universal fl at-rate programmes; and dominated by liberal thought, including 3. compulsory earnings-related programmes. all of the English language high-income countries, it is diffi cult to move beyond The fi rst two types focus on age versus the belief that some room needs to be left retirement as the basis for payments, and for market solutions to retirement income they focus more on minimum income pro- needs. Moreover, if there is an effective tection than on earnings’ replacement. political limit on the ability to raise taxes, They tend to play a relatively more prom- major public pension programs may be inent role in liberal societies, other than seen as a barrier to achieving other public the United States, than they do elsewhere policy objectives. The same problem can in the OECD area. They are also found in arise in low-income countries where the Nordic countries where, except for Den- tax collection capacity of governments is mark, they exist side by side with sub- limited for practical reasons. stantial publicly administered earnings- Also, if a political system is prone to related plans. However, it is worth adding major swings in the outlook of those in that fl at-rate benefi t plans also contribute
13 to earnings replacement and do so in a re- Defined benefit versus distributive manner. defined contribution The third type of plan is designed spe- cifi cally to replace pre-retirement earn- Most, but not all trade union movements ings. In continental Europe plans of this have shown a clear preference for DB sort often form a substantial part of the pensions versus DC pensions, and this entire pension system. This type of plan widespread preference refl ects the greater has substantial advantages over most al- certainty of the benefi ts that will be pro- ternatives as a way to provide retirement vided on retirement by DB plans. The gen- income to people retiring from long peri- eral absence of risk pooling in DC plans ods of formal employment. For others, they means that individuals bear virtually all function less effectively. They may or may of the risks entailed in the lack of certainty not include signifi cant internal redistribu- about future wages and salaries; rates of tion and the self-employed may or may return on investment during working life; not participate in them. Because plans of annuity prices at the date of retirement; this sort are fi nanced by earnings-related and so on. Where participation in a DC contributions, they can drive a substan- plan leads to the purchase of an annuity, tial wedge between take home pay and there is pooling of longevity risk which is total labour costs. Thus, they can induce taken on by the vendor of the annuity. But, tax avoidance, particularly on the part of where participation leads to a “phased low-wage workers and/or their employers. withdrawal” of assets, the longevity risk They are also vulnerable in periods of se- is also born by the individual plan partici- vere economic distress when their revenue pant and there is a chance that retirement base may contract, while their benefi ciary assets will be exhausted while the plan base does not. member is still alive. An important consideration with re- In addition to the general risks to spect to the operation of each of these which DC plans give rise, there may be types of programme is how, if at all, they subtle (or not so subtle) differential im- deal with the pension rights of immi- pacts by gender. In the absence of direct grants and migrant workers. Ideally, glo- subsidization of years spent bearing and bally mobile workers would accumulate raising children, it is likely that women rights to retirement pensions as they move whose working lives are interrupted from country to country. But making sig- by these events will end up with lower nifi cant progress in this direction is by benefi ts than their male counterparts. In no means easy. Global migration patterns addition, there is some evidence in the are dominated by movement from low-in- United States that women are more cau- come to higher income countries. Many of tious investors than men and may, as a the source countries still have rudimen- result, end up with lower DC accumula- tary social security pensions so migrants tions (Turner, 2001). may have had no pension coverage in their Two other aspects of DC arrangements home countries. Moreover, because earn- are worth noting. First, because DC bene- ings in the source countries are very low fi ts rely on compounding interest during compared to those in receiving countries, the accumulation phase, benefi ts tend to a benefi t based in large part on a pension grow exponentially rather than propor- entitlement in the country of origin may tionately over time. Second, DC plans not mean much in a host country. Com- take a signifi cant period of time to ma- pensating fully for the differences in earn- ture and to deliver benefi ts whereas DB ings and the development of social secur- plans, whether they are pay-go or pre- ity between countries of origin and host funded, are capable of delivering newly countries creates dilemmas of its own. established benefi ts relatively quickly. In recent years, mandatory DC plans have become common place in World Bank
14 client countries and in some OECD coun- As was suggested above, it is likely eas- tries as well. The risks that are inherent in ier to phase in benefi ts quickly under pay- these plans can be mitigated by: assign- go DB plans and pre-funded DB plans, than ing a small place in the pension system as under DC. Moreover, while fully funded a whole to mandatory DC plans; having DB plans can achieve this objective, they strong fi rst pillar arrangements in place; require very high levels of contribution providing rate of return guarantees; and in the early years if any element of past allowing older workers (or all workers) to service is recognized under the plan and choose between old and new systems. Op- funding targets are linked to the plans’ erating examples of all of these mitigating liabilities in whole or in part. The relative measures can be found. ease of phasing in benefi ts quickly under The shift from DB to DC in both second pay-go plans is one of its virtues. But, this and third pillar arrangements has given strength of pay-go is accompanied by the rise to important questions about the ap- common need to increase pay-go contribu- propriate regulatory arrangements for tions with no increase in benefi ts as larger DC plans and what needs to be done to portions of the elderly population become provide plan members with the necessary eligible for the new benefi ts. This source knowledge to manage their DC accounts of upward pressure on required contribu- effectively. These issues are now in front of tions may be accentuated by an increase in national authorities and are an important the size of the older population. These con- part of the work of the OECD’s Working tribution increases may cause the plans party on Private Pensions. to be vulnerable to political attack. (The relative ease of phasing-in pay-go benefi ts causes some commentators to suggest that Pre-funding versus Pay-Go pay-go DB plans are prone to “unsustain- able” benefi t promises.) Historically, the chief concern of trade Levels of contributions required by unions in the pension arena has been the the two funding methods may differ even provision of adequate benefi ts to retired after the plans reach their maturity. Gen- people. Given this focus, the question erally, if aggregate wage growth exceeds whether pensions should be pre-funded rates of return on fi nancial assets, pay-go or pay-go has been addressed largely in contributions will be lower and vice versa. terms of which method would provide If labour force and employment trends fol- benefi ts more quickly and securely than low the population trends noted above, the other. aggregate wages will be at or below levels In the context of recent pension debates, of individual wage growth. Rates of return the issue of pre-funding has taken on new on fi nancial assets might be expected to signifi cance as pre-funding has come to exceed aggregate wage growth on aver- be equated in both policy discourse and age over the long term, but much more actual pension reforms with a move to pri- caution on this point is required than is vately administered individual accounts. found in much of the commentary sup- Yet, there is no reason in principle why porting pre-funding. the objective of a higher degree of funding There will be feedback from demo- could not be achieved by increasing the graphic change into the operation of pre- size of reserve funds under second pillar funded systems and in general the feed- DB plans. There are, in fact, a number of back will lead to an increase in the contri- examples of large reserve funds being as- butions required of pre-funded pensions. sociated with second pillar DB plans. Even if pre-funded contributions are lower, From the point of view of achieving they will not be on a dramatically differ- improvements in benefi ts, there are some ent trajectory than pay-go contributions. aspects of pre-funding versus pay-go that If increased funding lowers required are worth considering. contributions, it does so by supplementing
15 contribution income with investment in- great deal and left an important, positive come. Investment income comes generally economic and social legacy. The fact that from the capital income stream in the econ- they are on the receiving end of an inter- omy, which is much narrower and more generational transfer through the pension volatile than labour income. 4 Thus, if in- system is an acceptable quid pro quo.5 creased funding is associated with very precise DB funding targets, the targets are likely to be exceeded or missed on a regu- Special considerations lar basis. This reality can translate into vol- in low-income countries atility in pension contributions which may be more troublesome than higher but more In low-income countries there are formal stable contributions in a pay-go regime. sector workers who have every reason to Also, in a closed economic context, look forward to a fi nancially secure retire- pre-funding is no different than pay-go in ment, just as in the high-income countries terms of the share of national income that there are people who never succeed in es- will be paid out by a pension scheme. The tablishing a lasting attachment to paid em- amount paid out is determined entirely on ployment and for whom pensions and re- the benefi t side of the programme. What tirement are not a meaningful concept. But changes with pre-funding is the income the balance between the two groups can streams that are tapped to pay for the pen- be quite different in high- and low-income sions. But, even here, one could conceive of countries and this can lead to somewhat a pay-go tax base that included non-wage different considerations in terms of how a income. Indeed, most fi rst pillar programs pension system might be designed. rely on the general tax base of govern- Where informal employment predomi- ments as a source of fi nancing. nates it goes without saying that earnings- Much of the argument in favour of in- related pensions will be limited in their creased funding bears little relation to the scope of operation. Coverage rates for adequacy of the retirement benefi ts that employment-related pensions outside the will be provided or to the best way of OECD area are seldom as high as 50 per providing them. It focuses largely on the cent, even for mandatory second pillar re- economic consequences of different fund- gimes, and coverage rates are often less ing systems and relies generally on some than 10 per cent (Asher, 2006, Barrientos, variant of the unproven, noting that pre- 2006, Mesa-Lago, 2006 and Phang, 2006). funding will enhance savings, investment Moreover, close attention needs to be paid and economic growth. to the question of whether fi nancing earn- Another argument that has been made ings-related pensions from payroll contri- in favour of pre-funding that has the ap- butions is increasing the numbers of peo- pearance of a pension argument is that ple engaged in informal employment by pre-funded systems are fairer between driving a wedge between labour costs and generations. But the key term has no fi xed take home pay. meaning (Wolfson and Rowe, 2006) and To provide pension benefi ts to people much of what is said about it relates more who have spent much of their working life to the rate at which benefi ts are phased in in informal employment, a tax fi nanced, than to the funding method. fi rst pillar programme may be most ap- It is also worth questioning how im- propriate. Bearing in mind that tax-rais- portant it is to establish intergenerational ing capacity can be a problem in low-in- equity within a pension system. Many of come countries, an income- or means- the early benefi ciaries of net intergenera- tested version of a fi rst pillar programme tional transfers in second pillar DB plans may be attractive because it will involve are the currently elderly and the elderly a lower level of government expenditure of the recent past. In many societies it is than a universal programme that provides accepted that these generations endured a the same income guarantee. However, an
16 income- or means-tested programme may that in low-income countries the balance be administratively expensive and also in the overall provision for the elderly involve perverse interactions with pro- should focus more strongly on the provi- grammes that are in place for workers in sion of necessary services (health, housing the formal economy. and transportation) rather than on income The tax-back rate under the income- provision. This could be particularly im- or means-tested programme will reduce portant where the elderly have been sep- the value of income from other sources arated from other generations in their ex- for people who receive benefi ts from the tended family and where HIV/AIDS has means- or income-tested programs and broken up networks of family support. other sources as well. These perverse in- teractions can become extreme in cases where the income range to which the Conclusions tax-back applies overlaps with income to which a personal income tax applies, The past decade has been a diffi cult period and/or the income range to which tax- for many trade union movements as far backs under social service programmes as pension policy is concerned. Pension like subsidized housing apply. reforms have been implemented that do While there are many important is- not refl ect trade union priorities. In many sues to resolve in designing fi rst pillar cases, unions have mounted substantial programmes, they can overcome the cov- opposition to them. Moreover the debate erage problems of the employment-related on pension reform has been frustrating. programs that tend to be predominant in It has often focused on issues that are not low-income countries. Moreover, they are germane to either the purpose of pension generally judged to make an effective con- plans or the central concerns of trade un- tribution to poverty reduction (Barrientos, ions. In addition, arguments in favour of 2006 and ILO, 2006). They can also have recent reforms have often relied too heav- a variety of positive side effects for the ily on unreasonably pessimistic predic- households that include elderly recipients tions about the demographic future and of fi rst pillar (Asher, 2006). its consequences. It is a legitimate aspiration of formal In considering a trade union response sector workers in low-income countries to to the current situation, it is important to have a decent retirement pension and it acknowledge the reality of a wide vari- is reasonable for governments to support ation in national circumstance in all of this aspiration. However, a question that is the economic, political and demographic relevant in almost all contexts takes on par- spheres. These national differences will ticular signifi cance in low-income coun- (and should) have an impact on what trade tries and that is the question of how much unions recommend with respect to pen- revenue should be sacrifi ced through tax sions systems, and to the likely outcome support for third pillar pensions, given the of future reform processes. possible alternative uses of the revenue. Despite national differences, there is Also, since formal employment in low-in- likely to be common ground among trade come countries is heavily concentrated in union movements on a few basic points: the public sector, it is important that public Pension and retirement income sys- employee pension costs be reasonable in a tems should be judged primarily, if not total compensation context. exclusively, on their ability to deliver In high-income countries, the elderly adequate retirement incomes, without who are poor are often treated more gen- imposing an inequitable burden on the erously than the lower income non-elderly. working-age population; It is not clear how this logic does or should apply in countries where low income and Adequate retirement incomes should poverty are pervasive. Also, it might be allow people to retire from extended
17 periods of formal employment without age groups. But, one reality of the youth a signifi cant loss in living standards, population at any point in time is that they and provide all older people with in- will be the older population at a later point comes above nationally recognized in time. It is necessary to encourage among low-income measures; today’s youth a sense of interest and con- cern for how they will be provided with Pension systems should have core pro- income and cared for in old age. grammes that provide benefi ts which Finally, it is important for trade union are reasonably predictable; representatives to engage in dialogue on Publicly administered pension plans pension issues with employers and gov- have a positive role to play in any ernment representatives, as well as policy pension system, and universal fl at- specialists. But, there are likely very few rate programmes can be useful in both political contexts where a trade union high- and low-income countries; movement on its own will be able to es- Pay-go fi nancing of public programmes tablish the political support required to has many desirable features and should implement a progressive pension agenda. not be readily abandoned; and Trade union movements need to identify and engage other groups in society that Representatives of workers/plan mem- are likely to share a common perspective bers should play an important role in on pension issues. the governance of second and third pil- lar programmes. Notes Moving forward on pension issues cre- ates some important challenges for trade 1 World Bank reform programmes typically unions. It will be diffi cult to stem the supported some form of tax-fi nanced minimum in- come programme for the elderly (i.e. a fi rst pillar), tide on undesirable pension reforms un- and greater reliance on “voluntary” retirement pro- less trade unions succeed in bringing the grammes (i.e. a third pillar). Many commentaries focus of pension discourse back to income and critiques of the World Bank’s efforts are now adequacy. This is an issue that needs to be available. One important source of critical commen- addressed in terms of the well-being of the tary is the International Social Security Review (Black- well Publishing on behalf of the International So- retired population overall. It also needs to cial Security Association). Many of the issues and be addressed with particular populations the intensity of the debate are captured in a collec- in mind, notably women and immigrants. tion of papers prepared by the Bank itself: (World Trade unions also need to do general Bank, 2001), and by World Bank, 2006. A self assess- pension education work with all levels ment of the Bank’s work is provided by: Holzmann and Hinz, 2005. A trade union commentary on the of their membership. Trade union lead- Bank’s approach was prepared by Peter Bakvis of ers need to be knowledgeable and con- the ICFTU. (See: Bakvis, 2006). fi dent advocates of progressive change. 2 A more complete version of this paper is available More specialized training is required for from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/ those who take on governance roles. Not relm/gb/docs/gb294/pdf/esp-4.pdf. It has benefi ted all of this training has to be provided from comments from Frank Hoffer of the ILO AC- TRAV, colleagues from the Trade Union Advisory within the trade union movement. But Committee to the OECD and from the ICFTU, as well the trade union movement does have a as trade unionists from many countries who partici- responsibility to be sure that the training pated in a seminar organized by the Global Union is available. Research Network in Lisbon in October, 2006. It is also important to encourage a life- 3 All actual demographic data are from the UN course perspective on pension and retire- population database and projections represent UN mid-range projections. ment issues. These issues often get dealt 4 To the extent that pre-funded pensions are in- with as if they are only relevant to the cur- vested in government bonds, the income streams rent elderly, whose interests are sometimes that are paying for pensions are those that make pitted against those of currently younger up the general tax base of a government. This will
18 be predominantly labour income. In practice, many Mesa-Lago, Carmelo, 2006. “Structural Pension of the new mandatory DC schemes have been regu- Reform – Privatization – in Latin America” lated so that they are invested largely in govern- in Gordon L. Clark, Alicia H. Munnell and J. ment bonds. Unless this changes in the years ahead, Michael Orszag (eds) The Oxford Handbook of these plans will function very much like pay-go Pensions and Retirement Income (Oxford: Oxford plans with somewhat different distributional char- University Press). acteristics than the old earnings-related DB plans. OECD, 2005. Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies Across (World Bank, 2006) OECD Countries. (Paris: OECD). 5 The issue of intergenerational fairness is a OECD 2000. Reforms for An Ageing Society. (Paris: serious one. But, while much of the commentary on OECD). the issue focuses on fi nancial issues, the main is- sues have non-fi nancial defi nitions. It is important OECD, 2001. Ageing and Income: Financial Resources that each generation of young people inherit from and Retirement in 9 OECD Countries. (Paris: their predecessors: a capital stock of suffi cient size OECD). and quality to permit full employment at high in- OECD, 1998. Maintaining Prosperity in an Ageing So- comes; an environment that is useful for both pro- ciety. (Paris: OECD). duction and consumption; the skills and knowledge Phang, Hanam S., 2006. “Retirement Income Sys- required for production, civic responsibility and tems in Asia” in Gordon L. Clark, Alicia H. personal enjoyment; and social peace. Munnell and J. Michael Orszag (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income (Ox- ford: Oxford University Press). References Queisser, Monika and Edward Whitehouse, 2006. “Pensions: the Work of the OECD Social Policy Asher, Anthony, 2006. “Pensions in Africa”, in Gor- Division” (presentation to the OECD Working don L. Clark, Alicia H. Munnell and J. Michael Party on Private Pensions). Orszag (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pensions Sudén, Annika, 2006. “Unending Work” in Gor- and Retirement Income (Oxford: Oxford Univer- don L. Clark, Alicia H. Munnell and J. Michael sity Press). Orszag (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pensions Bakvis, Peter. 2006. “ICFTU/Global Unions” ana- and Retirement Income (Oxford: Oxford Univer- lysis of Pension Reform and the Development of Pen- sity Press). sion Systems: An Evaluation of World Bank Assist- Turner, John, 2001. Women and Portfolio Choice (Wash- ance by the Independent Evaluation Group of the inton, D.C.: American Association of Retired World Bank (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). People). Barrientos, Armando, 2006. “Pensions for Devel- Wolfson, Michael and Geoff Rowe, 2006. “Ageing opment and Poverty Reduction” in Gordon L. and Intergenerational Fairness – a Canadian Clark, Alicia H. Munnell and J. Michael Orszag Analysis” (paper presented to the International (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retire- Association for Research on Income and Wealth, ment Income (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Joensuu, Finland, August, 2006). Beaujot, Roderick. 2004. Delayed Life Transitions: World Bank, 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies Trends and Implications (Ottawa: Vanier Institute to Protect the Old and Promote Growth (Washing- of the Family). ton, D.C.: World Bank). Gillion, Colin, John Turner, Clive Bailey and Denis World Bank, 2001. New Ideas about Old Age Security Latulippe. 2000. “Social Security Pensions: De- (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). velopment and reform”. (Geneva: ILO). World Bank, 2006. Pension Reform and the Development Holzmann, Robert and Richard Hinz. 2005. Old Age of Pension Systems: An Evaluation of the World Bank Income Support in the 21st Century: An Interna- Assistance (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). tional Perspective on Pension Systems and Reforms. Yamada, Atsuhiro. 2002. “The Evolving Retire- (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). ment Income Package: Trends in Adequacy and International Labour Offi ce (ILO), 2006. “Social secur- Equality in Nine OECD Countries” Labour Mar- ity for all: Investing in global social and economic ket and Social Policy Occasional Paper No. 63. development – A consultation”. (Geneva: ILO). (Paris: OECD).
19
Social security for all: Investing in global social and economic development
There is a need to arrive at a new consensus on the responsibilities of the global society, the nation State, communities, social part- ners, civil society and individuals for the provision of social security. Global minimum social standards and global financial transfers are to some extent substitutes. The key role of the nation State needs reconfirmation but the complementary and supporting role of the global community also has to be defined. The wider the implemen- tation of minimum social standards at the national level – enabled by sufficient fiscal space – the less international transfers will be needed to combat poverty.
Michael Cichon Director Social Security Department ILO
his article seeks to explore the frame- Aspects of rights and principles Twork within which the ILO should pro- mote a principled, practical and respon- Social security has been a core element sive approach to social security policy 1 in of the ILO’s mandate, virtually since its the new millennium. This is an abridged creation in 1919. At the ground-breaking version of a consultation paper issued by 26th Session of the International Labour the Social Security Department of the ILO Conference in Philadelphia in 1944, the in August 2006.2 ILO enshrined its recognition of the need The most important single reference to provide an adequate level of social pro- source is the general discussion held at the tection in the Declaration of Philadelphia. 89th Session of the International Labour Both before and after 1944, the Organ- Conference in June 2001. The vision of so- ization has developed a series of Conven- cial security that emerged during this dis- tions and Recommendations concerned cussion gave rise to a set of 21 conclusions, with social security. Over time, the notion which confi rmed the validity, within the of social security as a basic human right developing paradigm of decent work, of the has gained wide acceptance, and has been general approach to social security which progressively developed in many other had been developed by the ILO through- forums and Conventions. out almost all its history since 1919. That approach is rights-based and formulated in terms of a specifi c set of contingencies, Aspects of social solidarity most of which threaten the capacity of an individual worker and her or his family to A vital role for social protection is to pro- generate their own income. vide income security in the event of such contingencies as old age, sickness, inval- idity, maternity and unemployment – in
21 addition to the provision of appropriate framework of good governance and the medical care for all. assurance that benefi ts will be paid as A number of issues have come to the and when due; fore in recent years which impact so- social security should be organized on cial security provision in many, if not all the basis of social solidarity between, countries, particularly those which are inter alia, men and women, different economically less well developed. Fore- generations, those in and out of work, most among these is the need to extend and the rich and poor; social security provision to those lacking coverage, who are largely represented in social security systems must be the so-called informal economy and gen- sustainable; erally very diffi cult to enrol in formal sys- the rule of law must prevail at both the tems of social security. For this reason, the national and international levels. conclusions adopted by the Conference in 2001 stressed the overall responsibility of In support of these specifi c principles, the State in the promotion, facilitation and wider linkages are also needed to: extension of coverage. the principles enshrined in ILO legal There are a range of gender-related is- instruments; sues which are specifi c to social security. These relate not only to the principle of the further principles enshrined in gender equality at the workplace but also the concept of decent work, the pro- to the problems encountered by women motion of which will ensure an ad- if family responsibilities preclude them ditional linkage with all other ILO from accruing adequate benefi ts under activities, in particular employment social insurance. generation; strong and well-functioning social di- alogue, involving social actors – spe- Guiding principles cifi cally the ILO’s social partners – in building and managing social security The discussion at the Conference in 2001 policy. also considered the way social security systems have evolved over time, the man- ner in which each country might develop a 1. Social security national strategy, and the role of the ILO in is a basic human right working effectively with its member States towards extending social security. It was In order to capture adequately the scope agreed that ILO activities should be an- of the measures and provisions for dis- chored in the Declaration of Philadelphia, cussion, this article is based on a rather the decent work concept and the relevant ILO broad understanding – rather than a pre- social security standards. Finally, a major cise defi nition – of social security as: the initiative was recommended in the form set of institutions, measures, rights and obli- of a campaign to be launched to promote gations whose primary goal is to provide – or the extension of social security coverage. aim to provide – according to specifi ed rules, In sum, the following principles, which income security and medical care to individual should underlie the ILO’s future work in members of society. social security, may be distilled from the This formulation may be interpreted in conclusions adopted in 2001: relation to societies – nations – as a whole, to social groups and to both formal and coverage should be universal and bene- informal economies. On an operational fi ts adequate; level, social protection or social security the State bears the ultimate and gen- systems may therefore be understood as eral responsibility of guaranteeing a incorporating:
22 those cash transfers in a society that 2. The need and demand seek to provide income security and, of people for social security by extension, to prevent or alleviate poverty; A large majority (about 80 per cent) of the global population live in conditions of so- those measures which guarantee ac- cial insecurity, i.e. they have no access to cess to medical care, health and social formal social security beyond the limited services; possibilities of relying on families, kinship other measures of a similar nature de- groups or communities to secure their signed to protect the income, health standard of living. Among these 80 per and well-being of workers and their cent, 20 per cent live in abject poverty – the families. cruellest form of insecurity. An alternative model of poverty pre- From a global legal perspective, the rec- vention and alleviation relies largely on ognition of the right to social security has the positive “trickle-down” effect of eco- been developed through universally nego- nomic growth. While a variety of ap- tiated and accepted instruments that pro- proaches may well complement each claim that social security is a fundamental other, there is no doubt that the benefi ts societal right to which every human is en- of the trickle-down effect will take much titled. This principle is laid down in: longer to reach those in need unless pol- icies of direct and immediate poverty re- Article 22 of the Universal Declaration lief though social transfers are in place. of Human Rights; and The ILO estimates that only 2 per cent of Article 9 of the International Cove- global GDP would be needed to provide nant on Economic, Social and Cultural the entire world’s poor with a minimum Rights. package of social benefi ts and services (access to basic health care, basic income The International Labour Conference transfers in case of need and basic edu- adopted the fi rst international labour cation). Most of these resources could be Conventions on social security at its very raised nationally. Nonetheless, substantial fi rst session in 1919. Social security as a global transfers would be needed to help human right is part of the ILO’s mandate the poorest countries with a GDP per cap- and is enshrined in a series of ILO Con- ita close to – or below – the global poverty ventions; most prominent among these is line to cope with their problems. the Social Security (Minimum Standards) There is clear evidence from Europe Convention, 1952 (No. 102), which became and OECD countries that social transfers the blueprint for the European Code of So- successfully reduce poverty and social in- cial Security. security and that there is a strong correla- This legal framework implies that any tion between the size and levels of these State that has decided to become a mem- transfers and the strength of the poverty ber of the United Nations and the ILO has reduction effect. As a recent OECD study the general and fundamental legal obliga- pointed out: tion to put in place decent social protection for its people. The relationship between government policies and poverty outcomes is striking: across coun- tries, relative poverty rates among the work- ing-age population are lowest where (non- health) social spending on the working-age population is highest. Within each country, the combined effect of the tax and benefi t systems is to lift out of relative income poverty more than half of the population at risk, on average.
23 This effect, which ranges between around one- security is income security. Income secur- fourth of those below the poverty threshold ity is about living in a situation in which before taxes and transfers in the United States basic needs, such as food, housing, health and more than two-thirds in Denmark, de- care and education, can be secured in an clined however over the second half of the uninterrupted way. This not only requires 1990s in most OECD countries, as the growth having both an adequate and regular of real benefi ts most often lagged that of me- source of income; it also requires being as- dian disposable income.3 sured that there are mechanisms in place if something unexpected happens to the Experience with social transfers in devel- regular source of income. These mech- oping countries is more ambiguous, since anisms should be able to provide income overall transfer volumes are comparatively replacement to close the emerging income small. However, some basic social protec- gap and/or to guarantee access to goods tion transfers, such as benefi ts of social and services necessary to meet those un- health insurance and basic non-contribu- expected needs. tory pension schemes, have proven to be potent means in the fi ght against poverty. Ill health is the main reason for poverty: 3. Social security not only does it lead to high costs – e.g. in and economic performance the form of user fees – but it is likely to im- pact signifi cantly on income generation. It National social protection systems and has been observed4 that social health pro- their perceived effects on economic per- tection can effectively address health-re- formance have been subject to intense pol- lated poverty if benefi ts are adequate and icy debates in many countries over recent affordable. Recent experience with modest decades. There are experts who claim that universal pension systems in a number of social redistribution of up to 35 per cent developing countries has also shown posi- of countries’ GDPs is an impediment to tive poverty-reducing effects for whole growth, with negative effects in both the families. They not only provide benefi ts short and the long term. Others hold an for the old and disabled but also use this opposite view and consider social protec- disadvantaged group – whose status in tion – if well managed – to be a genuine families is greatly enhanced through the productive factor. A team of ILO writers cash income they receive – as effective concluded recently:8 “Once all the argu- agents of social transfers for whole fami- ments are on the table, the outcome of the lies. Pension recipients redistribute cash theoretical debate on the potential positive income in the household, fi nance school versus negative economic effects of the fees and medication, etc.5 welfare state appears to be a draw …”. It is calculated that such social secur- Social transfers may well have a dir- ity benefi ts in most countries would cost ect positive impact on growth; but the between 1 and 2 per cent of GDP or 5 and key issue is to recognize that substantial 10 per cent of national budgets.6 Imple- levels of social expenditure and economic menting this benefi t would be, for many growth can coexist9 and that such trans- countries, a fast fi rst step towards attack- fers are the tool to make the economic ing a chronic poverty pocket. Another ILO growth equitable, thus strengthening its simulation exercise shows that even a very sustainability. modest universal pension, costing about The substantial global economic 1 per cent of GDP, would reduce the pov- growth rates in many countries over re- erty gap in Senegal and the United Repub- cent years have not translated into an lic of Tanzania by more than 20 per cent.7 equally fast decline in poverty or social An important dimension of overall insecurity. Indeed, social insecurity has human security is economic security – been increasing in many countries along- and one of the main aspects of economic side cuts in social protection. Neverthe-
24 less, since the mid-1970s major welfare through public social security interven- states such as Austria, France, Germany, tions (along with the tax systems) and can- the Netherlands and others broadly main- not be delegated to private arrangements tained their social expenditure, as meas- – either market ones or even traditional ured by the percentage allocation of GDP, ones based on extended family or commu- at the levels reached in the mid-1970s. nity income sharing. According to the paradigm of contain- The importance of equitable growth is ment, low European growth rates have meanwhile recognized widely. A World come about mainly as a result of social Bank source states: “Others have suggested protection provisions which are too high that greater equity comes at the expense of and wrongly designed. All that can be ob- lower growth and that there is a trade off served at present is that social expenditure between growth and equity […]. A large in European OECD countries (measured number of recent empirical studies […] in percentage of GDP) has stabilized at have found that there is not necessarily long-run levels – and this applies equally such a trade off and that equity in its vari- to low and to high growth economies. It ous dimensions is growth enhancing”.“… is evident that cost containment policies most developing countries will likely have have not brought about higher economic substantial scope for enhancing the qual- growth. ity of growth […] through policies aimed Some believe that too much security, at improving income distribution.”10 That particularly income security, undermines is precisely what a well-designed social people’s incentives to engage more in security system does. economic activities and to be inventive But how much social security is afford- and productive. But the truth is likely to able? OECD countries spend between 10 be exactly the opposite: the less secure and 30 per cent of GDP on social security – we feel, the more averse we are to take usually between one-third and one-half of risks. Studies reveal that poor people are total public expenditure. Countries at the risk-averse. Rational risk-averse individu- same level of economic development differ als will only take a risk if the potential signifi cantly in how much they spend on loss is relatively small compared to their social security. wealth. The poor are usually not eager to In the OECD region there is a strong risk even small amounts as this threatens positive correlation between social ex- their very survival. Wealth provides se- penditure (per capita of the population) curity, and more can be risked. For many and labour productivity (GDP per hour people, social security substitutes wealth. worked). The correlation between “sim- Those who have no access to relevant pro- ple” per capita (per worker) productivity tection mechanisms against numerous so- and social expenditure (per capita of the cial risks will avoid taking any additional population) is also positive but less tight. economic risks, as they have to focus on While the nature of the actual causality protecting themselves. behind this correlation may not yet have Social protection, however, is not only been fully researched, one conclusion is about risk management. Providing income obvious: an extensive social security sys- security to the poor is one of the important tem is not incompatible with a highly pro- mechanisms to provide greater equality of ductive economy. opportunity, income and wealth than that at present experienced in the world. Social transfers are usually expected to result in a distribution of income in society that dif- fers from the one brought about by market forces. No private market mechanisms can redistribute income in this way. Income redistribution has to be provided mainly
25 4. The main challenges national social protection systems operate to social security systems – in particular in developing countries. Among infectious diseases expected to The global demographic transition become a pandemic, HIV/AIDS is the most acute. In some regions of Africa, The demographic environment of a so- the infection rate is estimated to have cial protection system, which includes reached almost 40 per cent. This implies, the morbidity structure of the popula- in all probability, that within the next fi ve tion with which the health system has to to ten years at the latest, 40 people out of cope, co-determines the system depend- every 100 alive today will have died. It is ency ratio. Demography is not the exclu- probably fair to say that HIV/AIDS will sive determining factor, as governance wipe out all the fi nancial and fi scal room too has a marked impact on dependency. for improvement in social protection that The economy co-determines the number growth in Africa might have produced of unemployed while national law, which under normal conditions. But it should is a governance factor, co-determines the not be forgotten that malaria, although number of people who are retired and of less prominent and confi ned to the poor- those receiving education. est regions of the world, has an even more The other determinants – economic de- dramatic effect on population structures velopment and governance factors – being and morbidity structures. equal, ageing is the most important factor of infl uence on social transfers to elderly populations (both formal and informal) Migration and family composition which are, in turn, the biggest expenditure items in developed national social protec- The ILO estimates that, at the beginning of tion systems. However, while developed the new century, about 175 million people regions are substantially “older” than less worldwide were living outside their coun- developed ones, the pace of ageing is actu- try of birth or citizenship,11 among which ally much faster in the developing world. about 90 million were migrant workers. At The less developed countries in relative the same time, there has been a movement terms will face an even more serious age- of people from rural to urban areas. From ing problem between 2000 and 2050 and 1995 to 2005, the share of rural employment have to build strong transfer systems well in total world employment fell by three per- prepared to face this challenge. centage points, or around 90 million work- One of the most dramatic aspects of the ers, to about 40 per cent. Together with mi- demographic transition is rapidly drop- grating dependents, the total number of ping fertility rates. The global average fer- persons moving from rural to urban areas tility rates dropped within the three dec- might be in the order of 200 million peo- ades between 1970-75 and 2000-05 from ple within decades. Including migrants 4.49 to 2.65, i.e. by about 40 per cent. This in national social security systems is one is by no means a phenomenon that only way of helping them integrate into their applies to developed countries. new countries or the cities in which they choose to live. In addition, the remittances of migrant workers have become the major Changes in health, society source of income for many families in a and the labour market large number of countries. These fi nancial fl ows might help to fi nance more income Public health issues security in the “labour-exporting” coun- tries and regions. New public health threats constitute an- other factor that may rapidly change the demographic environment in which some
26 Informalization of labour markets spread defi ned-benefi t pension schemes, and economies fi nanced on a pay-as-you-go basis into pre-funded defi ned contribution schemes, The “dual economy” model had assumed would help to ensure the availability and that most agricultural workers would move affordability of pension schemes. There from rural into urban areas into higher were several assumptions: productivity manufacturing jobs. This Despite ageing populations levels of assumption simply no longer holds true. contributions and costs would be main- Manufacturing has ceased to be a major tained because people would contrib- sector of employment growth in many re- ute longer and retired later in order to gions and the rural-to-urban movement maintain benefi t levels. of labour is largely absorbed by trade, in particular informal petty trade. Hence the Linking amounts contributed with expectations that there would be a grad- future benefi ts would provide very ual movement towards the formalization strong incentives to contribute, even of the largely informal agricultural labour on a voluntary basis. force have also not been met. The ILO has Those incentives would thus extend estimated that, at the end of the 1990s, the coverage to all those who were uncov- share of informal employment in non-ag- ered, particularly the self-employed. ricultural employment was 48 per cent in North Africa, 72 per cent in sub-Saharan Privatization would strengthen these Africa, 51 per cent in Latin America and incentives by providing higher rates 65 per cent in Asia.12 of return and also by gaining higher public confi dence than allegedly bank- rupt public schemes. Globalization and the new uncertainty The Chilean pension reform, introduced The increased international economic in- already at the beginning of the 1980s, was tegration during the last decades of the the fi rst attempt to implement policies twentieth century coincided with rising following this new paradigm. The World income inequality in some countries. In Bank’s publication, Averting the old-age addition to the impact of internationali- crisis (1994), announced this new pension zation on wages and employment, which policy paradigm as relevant globally. Over reduces the national tax base, there is an the past few years, the ILO has undertaken erosion of the capacity of national gov- numerous studies13 of the reformed pen- ernments to set their own targets with sion systems, particularly of those in Latin respect to social protection. Critics of the America and of the transition countries in “welfare state” have argued that increased Central and Eastern Europe. These studies international openness creates diffi culties confi rm that the outcomes of the reformed in raising suffi cient revenues, and there- pension schemes may: fore requires a downsizing of the “welfare reduce the income security of those state”. There is some evidence that coun- covered when they become old; tries are currently engaged in tax compe- tition – although the effects seem to be reduce the actual effective coverage of much smaller than might be expected. In those previously covered; a number of OECD countries, average tax fail to increase coverage of those not rates on labour have increased, perhaps to previously covered; and compensate for the loss of capital tax in- come although it could also be due to the fail to increase national savings rates. shrinking tax base of employed people. There was a strong belief in some quar- ILO concerns have in the meantime ters that the reforms converting wide- been echoed by the World Bank’s own
27 Figure 4.1. Theoretical gross replacement rates in selected European Union Member States: Average earnings, 40 years of contributions, retirement at age 65
2005 2050 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 Poland France Sweden 1 Sweden 2 Czech Latvia Republic
Notes: 1 National pension system only; 2 Including occupational pensions. Source: Own comparative analysis of data included in national pension strategy reports as avail- able on http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/social_protection/pensions_en.htm.
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). those who – like the self-employed – ob- The Group’s report on the evaluation of ligatorily contribute only a certain low the World Bank’s assistance to pension minimum amount). reforms14 concluded, inter alia: “There is Figure 4.1 shows expected theoretical little evidence that privately funded pil- replacement rates for selected EU Mem- lars have succeeded in increasing national ber States as reported in their national savings or in developing capital markets pension strategy reports. From these pro- …” and “… the Bank’s preoccupation with jections it is obvious that it is not only fi scal sustainability tended to obscure schemes which go through so-called the broader goal of pension policy, that paradigmatic reforms or privatization is, to reduce poverty and improve retire- (Poland, Sweden and Latvia) which will ment income adequacy within a fi scal see reduced replacement rates: public constraint.” schemes will also experience declines Some countries in Europe have intro- (France and Czech Republic). The alter- duced – or are considering introducing – native to decline would be for people to reforms similar to those in Latin America, contribute signifi cantly longer and retire aimed mainly at reducing future costs of much later, to increase contributions or pensions to the public budgets in the hope for the State to subsidize contributions that such systems will encourage later re- via increased tax revenue. tirement. ILO studies, quoted above, also point to high and long-lasting transitional costs, high administrative costs and ex- pected low replacement rates, especially for women or other persons with short, broken careers and lower incomes (or
28 Between universalism and pluralism: care, fi ght HIV and AIDS, provide more The changing pattern of solidarity clean water and sanitation, and offer so- cial protection”.15 In contrast to the demographic challenge, At the same time, the question of the the possible detrimental effects of global responsibility of the State in providing tax competition on the level of social se- basic benefi ts is once again central to the curity in some countries are less easily debate taking place in countries which un- manageable. What is required is interna- dertook a partial “privatization” of their tional recognition – and corresponding social security systems in the 1980s and agreements – that the extension of social 1990s. security coverage and the ensuing eradi- Some say that the acceptance of the cation of poverty would be an investment; concept of solidarity is deteriorating as this would avoid the resentment that cre- many social protection schemes are bro- ates national social unrest and potential ken down into smaller and smaller risk global security problems. pools (right down to the fi nancing of risks The past few years have witnessed by individual accounts). Others observe new developments in this area. There that the commonly accepted notion of soli- seems to be increasing recognition of the darity is simply changing, now focusing role of social security as an investment more on the attainment of basic security in poverty alleviation. There is growing for more people rather than equal secur- support for a new social security develop- ity for a few. In any case, social security mental paradigm based on the introduc- systems are becoming more pluralistic. tion of basic universal benefi ts. Following Pension schemes are turning into sys- the “new consensus” on social security tems in which the basic public provision reached by the International Labour Con- of income security mechanisms is topped ference in 2001 and the launching by the up by social insurance or privatized sav- ILO in 2003 of the Global Campaign on ings arrangements with benefi ts that have Social Security and Coverage for All, the a much closer link to earned insured in- World Commission on the Social Dimen- come – which in turn are topped up by sion of Globalization promoted the idea of voluntary or mandated arrangements. The a socio-economic fl oor for the global econ- consequence is a wide range of different omy and indicated that social security and income levels at retirement between vary- wider social protection had to become an ing population groups. important component of such a set of min- Community-based health schemes are imum social standards (see box 4.1). springing up everywhere in the develop- Almost unnoticed, the global commu- ing world, most frequently in Africa and nity has already assumed more respon- parts of Asia. At present, the global cover- sibility for the provision of basic services age of such mutual schemes is estimated in a number of developing countries. In to be about 40 million persons. There is Ghana and the United Republic of Tan- certainly room for further growth and zania, for example, direct budget support qualitative improvements in governance from donors already accounts for sub- of these schemes. They cannot constitute stantial proportions (i.e. 40 per cent and or substitute a universal basic layer of se- 50 per cent, respectively) of the national curity based on national solidarity. Com- health budget. A “White Paper” on inter- munity-based schemes have the potential national development, entitled “Making to increase the overall resource base, at the governance work for the poor” and pub- national level, for social security. The de- lished by the Government of the United velopment of these schemes represents a Kingdom in 2006, commits “at least half fi rst step forward to the “formalization” of of all future UK direct support for de- the informal economy. veloping countries to public services, to get children into school, improve health
29 Box 4.1 Socio-economic floor A minimum level of social protection for individuals and families needs to be accepted unequivo- cally as part of the socio-economic “floor” of the global economy. Donors and financial institutions should contribute to the strengthening of social protection systems in developing countries.1 In his Report to the International Labour Conference in 2004, the Director-General identified four major areas in which the ILO had found positive experiences. He considered that they could make a major contribution to developing the concept of a socio-economic floor: First, community-based health insurance. The demand for health insurance is strong, par- ticularly among those without any form of protection. One option for workers and families in low-income countries is community-based social security schemes. The ILO has acquired experi- ence and knowledge on the strengths and weaknesses of such funds. Their financial viability is often called into question if one considers these funds in isolation. However, innovative mo- dalities have been introduced in some cases, combining local contributions, public expenditure and international assistance. Linking local initiatives with national insurance schemes is another method that merits further exploration. Second, minimum pension schemes. A number of countries have shown that minimum pen- sion schemes financed from tax revenues for poor elderly persons, disabled people, single moth- ers and orphaned families affected by the HIV/AIDS pandemic are affordable. The manifold bene- fits of these schemes – from gender equality to family cohesion and school attendance – are well documented. The ILO could consider extending assistance to demonstrate the viability of these programmes in other countries and develop guidelines. Where fiscal constraints currently prevent such an option, proposals for international financial assistance should be elaborated. Third, cash grants for primary education. Scores of millions of children are unable to go to school or complete basic education because of family poverty. Most of them are driven into some form of child labour. A few countries, most notably Brazil and South Africa, are considering or experimenting with schemes for cash grants to poor families tied to school attendance for their children. The ILO’s International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) has gained considerable experience with schemes that combat child labour by combining family support for education and other essential needs. There is scope for scaling up these successful initiatives to national levels and extending them to other countries facing similar problems. A combination of national efforts with generous international assistance is required. Fourth, reorienting public expenditure for expanding basic coverage. Statutory social security systems, even with modest coverage, are faced with severe constraints of overall governance, tech- nical and administrative capacity and financial viability. Although higher social expenditure can be financed through faster economic growth, the costs are often perceived to exceed fiscal capacity in the short term. In many countries, the first objective is not to increase spending but to reorient present expenditure towards basic coverage. There is sufficient knowledge and experience world- wide to enable social security systems to achieve long-term financial and administrative viability. The ILO can assist in making such expertise available when and where required. A code of good practice or basic principles in the management of social security schemes could be considered.2 Notes: 1 World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization: A fair globalization: Creating op- portunities for all (Geneva, ILO, 2004) p. xiii. 2 ILO: A fair globalization. The role of the ILO, Report of the Director-General on the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (ILC, 92nd Session, Geneva, 2004), pp. 36-37.
5. A policy vision: Establishing European OECD countries would not the appropriate paradigm have experienced such great economic and social development as they did dur- Some people may not want to believe that ing the post-war period had they not intro- social security is a prerequisite for growth duced such comprehensive social security because it is impossible to demonstrate programmes. the exact logical causality. The evidence, Seeing social security expenditure simply, that economic performance and only as an additional cost that may neg- solid social security can and do coexist atively affect economic performance is is compelling.16 Many European and non- short-sighted. Social security responds
30 to the basic needs and clearly expressed Income security requires social protection preferences of societies, a public good that in the form of public social security inter- people are willing to pay for in terms of ventions. Indeed, core security remains a taxes and contributions – provided these task for the State – which is also the only are well spent. Social security transfers are institution that can formulate an overall na- the only direct means to overcome poverty tional social security development plan. and social insecurity in the short term. Private insurance fails to deal ade- quately with social risks: fi rst, not all risks are insurable in full or in part; and, sec- The role of the agents of change ond, more pragmatically, the poorer sec- tions are unable to pay for a full level of The role of individuals insured coverage. and communities It is also not enough to rely on informal, traditional social protection arrangements Many social insurance schemes provide to provide basic security through extended income-replacement payments in the event family and community networks. Not of certain contingencies. The replacement only are these traditional arrangements rates of these benefi ts are inevitably lower slowly disappearing on account of ur- than unity. A 100 per cent income replace- banization and industrialization but they ment is unrealistic and would most likely very often provide security at a high cost provide adverse incentives. Income re- and are not usually based on altruism. In placement beyond a certain level there- addition, mutual support by families and fore has to be provided for by individuals communities tends to be distributed in a through secondary and tertiary security very unequal way. In other words, poor systems or the accumulation of assets that people can usually only expect support may be turned into income streams when from their almost-as-poor families and such contingencies strike. While the ulti- communities; providing support (e.g. in mate responsibility of the State is indis- the case of catastrophic health costs) may, pensable, paternalism that restricts indi- in fact, force entire families and communi- vidual responsibility is highly unlikely ties into lasting distress. to be compatible with modern societies. However, it is simply not feasible to Community-based initiatives – where the implement appropriate programmes and top-down approach through the nation establish the necessary institutions to se- State is not forthcoming and particularly cure decent work in countries where gov- when the State is failing – might be a fi rst ernments are not able to collect the taxes step towards developing national social or contributions needed to provide for security systems through a bottom-up ap- basic public and social services and basic proach, potentially paving the way for a infrastructure. Equally, citizens must have gradual development of governance ethics confi dence in the government’s capacity to and good practices. manage social protection, and this can only be built in a democratic environment. But, within the context of globalization Reconfirming the responsibility and having regard to the evidence of tax of the nation State competition between nation states in at- tracting investment, the global commu- While private schemes and arrangements nity has to organize the global economy can improve the level of income replace- and the global society in such a way as to ment in the event of certain contingencies enable nation States to achieve nationally for various groups in a society, basic social and internationally defi ned policy objec- security, i.e. a fair distribution of income tives. This would mean searching for ways even in times of economic distress, can in which the global community might pro- only be underwritten by societies at large. tect the fi scal space of the nation State.
31 The nature of rights derived from ILO standards can be seen as a tool in the glo- and other international instruments bal process to protect the fi scal space of social security systems. New and wider There is a range of international legal in- instruments might have to follow. struments through which Member States of the United Nations or the ILO derive an obligation to provide some degree of Building a policy vision: social security to all their citizens. Binding Development approach to social instruments are: security – Towards universal coverage 1. the ILO Constitution; The ILO policy development vision focuses 2. the Universal Declaration of Human on building country-specifi c effective and Rights; effi cient national social security systems, affordable to countries at different levels 3. the Social Security (Minimum Stand- of development. Such an approach has ards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102); and thus to be: 4. the Social Policy (Basic Aims and (a) fl exible, to accommodate to national Standards) Convention, 1962 (No. 117) circumstances; as it relates to developing “broad sys- tems of education, vocational training (b) progressive, i.e. it has to permit a grad- and apprenticeship”. ual build-up of more comprehensive systems as societies mature (in an eco- Additionally, there is a series of recom- nomic sense); and mendations and conclusions, which are (c) normative, i.e. it has to accept the benefi t weaker than ratifi able instruments, which levels and entitlements defi ned by the contribute to the obligations upon mem- ILO’s minimum standards (for exam- ber States: ple, Convention No. 102) as an ultimate 1. The Income Security Recommenda- minimum desired level of protection. tion, 1944 (No. 67); Such a basic social protection package 2. The Medical Care Recommendation, would have a major impact on the reduc- 1944 (No. 69); and tion of poverty and the improvement of 3. The conclusions of the general discus- living standards. Access to basic social sion on social security at the 89th Ses- services, notably health care and educa- sion of the Conference in 2001. tion, undoubtedly has marked effects on increasing productivity and reducing pov- The ILO interprets the entirety of the above erty in the short and long run. In addition, instruments as a mandate to defi ne a basic cash transfers can play a major role in minimum protection package (that could providing basic income security to those also be described as a “social fl oor”) to ful- who do not have any earnings capacity, as fi l the international recommendations, no- shown in a GTZ17-sponsored pilot project tably the requirements of Article 22 of the in the Kalomo district of Zambia.18 Recent Universal Declaration of Human Rights. ILO micro-simulations reveal, in the case The fl oor should, in fact, consist of a hi- of the United Republic of Tanzania, that erarchy of fl oors that has to be reached at the combination of basic universal old- different levels of development. age pensions and child benefi ts to school Setting global fl oors for social rights children and orphans under the age of and social transfers may halt “the race to 14 would reduce overall poverty rates by the bottom” – when it comes to curbing about one-third.19 social rights and social spending – at an The key objective is universality. That acceptable decent level. ILO social security is the core mandate of the ILO global cam- standards with a support of core labour paign on social security and coverage for
32 all. As mentioned above, the International Extending access to affordable health Labour Conference in 2001 unanimously care should also be linked to employment entrusted the ILO with conducting that and income policies, as well as to occu- campaign. “Universality” may refer to pational safety and health policies, with a the various dimensions of social security. particular stress on providing security in Here, the main emphasis is on universal- the event of an employment-related sick- ity of access of individuals to formal sys- ness, injury or accident. This applies both tems of social protection. The notion of a to employees and the self-employed. As re- universal benefi t, payable without distinc- gards the self-employed, the focus should tion to all qualifi ed members of a scheme, also be on awareness raising and the cre- on the other hand, fi ts well into the con- ation of mutual insurance schemes. cept of a rights-based scheme, but may in Family/children cash benefi ts (condi- practice have to tempered by some form tional or not on school attendance and/ of targeting of resources, when these are or participation in preventive health pro- limited. grammes) will be effective only if com- Attention should fi rst be focused on bined with an attempt to make the human building up benefi ts with a strong social and physical infrastructure of health and investment character. We thus believe that education systems available. All these fac- social security in the poorest countries tors together would be a major input of so- can gradually start with basic elements cial protection to policies aimed at eradi- such as: cating or preventing child labour. Expanding social protection/social se- access to basic health care through plu- curity systems is always tantamount to in- ralistic national systems that consist of tegrating those in the informal economy public tax-fi nanced components, social into more formal structures. Alongside and private insurance components, eq- this “formalization” and subsequent eco- uity funds and community-based com- nomic development, social protection may ponents that are linked to a strong cen- gradually extend beyond the minimum tral system; package described above. a system of family benefi ts that helps to As stressed by the International Labour combat child labour and permits chil- Conference in 2001, social security should dren to attend school; promote and be based on the principle of gender equality: a system of targeted basic cash transfer programmes of social assistance asso- … this implies not only equal treatment for ciated with public work programmes men and women in the same or similar situ- and similar labour market policies ations, but also measures to ensure equitable (like cash-for-work programmes); and outcomes for women. Society derives great a system of basic universal pensions benefi t from the unpaid care which women for old age, invalidity and survivorship in particular provide to children, parents and that in effect support whole families. infi rm family members. Women should not be systemically disadvantaged later in life Extending access to health care, if neces- because they made this contribution during sary supported by additional donor fi - their working years. … Social security and so- nancing, should undoubtedly be a priority cial services should be designed on the basis of everywhere – but particularly in countries equality of men and women. Measures which affected by mass diseases like malaria and facilitate the access of women to employment the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The provision will support the trend towards granting of free or affordable access to basic health women social security benefi ts in their own services should, in the fi rst place, be ex- right, rather than as dependents. tended to children, disabled persons and the elderly.
33 6. Conclusions Notes
Social security systems are powerful tools 1 A global framework, yet one within which the to combat poverty and social insecurity ILO would work with its member States to develop appropriate national policy perspectives and instru- and to achieve greater levels of income ments. equality. People need and want social 2 ILO, 2006; Social security for all: Investing in glo- security. Social security systems foster bal social and economic development – A consultation long-term economic performance, social at http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/ peace and international security. secsoc/downloads/publ/1519sp1.pdf There is a need to arrive at a new con- 3 M. Förster and M. Mira d’Ercole: Income distri- sensus on the responsibilities of the global bution and poverty in OECD countries in the second half of the 1990s, OECD Social, Employment and Migra- society, the nation State, communities, so- tion Working Paper No. 22 (Paris, 2005), p. 28. cial partners, civil society and individu- 4 X. Scheil-Adlung et al: What is the impact of so- als. Clearly, global minimum social stand- cial health protection on access to health care, health ex- ards and global fi nancial transfers are to penditure and impoverishment? A comparative analysis some extent substitutes. The key role of of three African countries, (Geneva, ILO, ESS Paper the national State needs reconfi rmation. No. 24, 2006). 5 The complementary and supporting role See: HelpAge International: Age and security: How social pensions can deliver effective aid to poor older of the global community has to be defi ned. people and their families (London, 2004). The wider the implementation of mini- 6 See: K. Pal, C. Behrendt, F. Léger, M. Cichon, K. mum social standards at the national level Hagemejer: Can low-income countries afford basic social – enabled by suffi cient fi scal space – the protection? First results of a modelling exercise, Issues less international transfers are needed to in social protection series, Discussion paper 13, ILO combat poverty. Social Security Department (Geneva, 2005). 7 The ILO global tripartite structure is See: F. Gassmann, C. Behrendt: Cash benefi ts in low-income countries: Simulating the effects on poverty optimal for initiating a global debate with reduction for Tanzania and Senegal, Issues in social pro- a view to reaching a necessary consensus tection series, Discussion paper 15, ILO Social Secur- on the new roles and the potential new ity Department (Geneva, 2006). instruments. It is also the ideal place to 8 M. Cichon, W. Scholz, et al.: Financing social empower the different players in social protection (Geneva, ILO, 2004), p. 121. security with knowledge and skills that 9 P. Li nder t : Growing public: Social spending and might contribute to sound national and economic growth since the eighteenth century, Vols. I and global governance of social security. II (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004). 10 J. Kingman (ed.): A sourcebook for poverty re- But fi rst and foremost the ILO seeks a duction strategies (two volumes) (Washington, DC, comprehensive vision of a national and World Bank, 2002), Vol. 2, Chap. 12 (Macroeconomic global social security: a system that is fl ex- issues), sections 12.2.4 and 12.2.5. ible to adapt to the state of economic devel- 11 ibid., p. 26. opment and yet pursues the key objectives 12 ibid., p. 28. of universality, poverty alleviation, the 13 For a list of these studies, please see footnotes containment of social insecurity through 25 and 27 in the ILO full consultation paper on which social rights, the promotion of long-term this article is based: ILO, 2006; Social security for all: growth and national and international Investing in global social and economic development – A consultation at http://www.ilo.org/public/english/ security and a fair distribution of income protection/secsoc/downloads/publ/1519sp1.pdf and non-discrimination. The discussion 14 World Bank: Pension reforms and the develop- at the International Labour Conference in ment of pension systems: An evaluation of World Bank 2001 was a step in that direction. assistance (Washington, DC, 2006) pp. xvi and xvii.
34 15 Department for International Development ized as a private company owned by the German (DFID): Eliminating world poverty: Making governance Federal Government. It works on a public benefi t work for the poor, White Paper on International De- basis, using all funds generated as profi ts exclu- velopment (London, 2006). sively for projects in international cooperation. 16 P. Li nder t, op. c it. 18 See, B. Schubert: Social cash transfers – reach- 17 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusam- ing the poorest. A contribution to the international debate menarbeit (GTZ- German Technical Cooperation In- based on experience in Zambia (Eschborn, GTZ, 2004). stitute). The GTZ was established in 1975. It is organ- 19 See, F. Gassmann, C. Behrendt, op. cit.
35
Challenges of old-age security reform in developing and transition countries: A trade union perspective
There is union support for the ILO’s global campaign for social secur- ity, although there is still scope in which unions believe the ILO can play a greater role. But the capacity of the ILO to shape global pen- sion policy is itself shaped by the dominating and at times damaging influence of the World Bank on national pension debates.
Peter Bakvis Director ITUC*/Global Unions Washington Office
he ILO’s consultation paper Social The ILO’s consultation paper TSecurity for All: Investing in Global Social on social security and Economic Development 1 expresses sev- eral objectives that trade unions will cer- The ILO’s consultation paper notes that tainly agree with regarding the future one of the conclusions of the 2001 ILC dis- of social security in the world. The ILO cussion was that the ILO should undertake paper follows the path set out by the 2001 a global campaign to promote the exten- International Labour Conference (ILC) sion of social security coverage. The glo- in the conclusions of a general discus- bal union movement hopes that this con- sion on social security held at the confer- sultation paper represents the start of an ence. This ITUC response identifi es some intensifi cation of the campaign. The ILO points of the ILO consultation paper that should expect that the union movement in unions particularly endorse and makes a all countries will be a willing and active few suggestions where we think the ILO partner for such a campaign. Unions are could play a stronger role than it has done particularly in agreement with the paper’s up to now in promoting social security. affi rmation that social security is a basic Lastly, this paper delves with some addi- human right, but a right that is not being tional detail into the particular challenges respected for the majority of the world’s of reform of old-age security in developing workers, who do not currently enjoy even and transition countries, focusing on the minimum coverage. very important role that the World Bank The ILO’s consultation paper provides has played in recent years in these coun- a very useful calculation of the relatively tries by promoting a model of reform that modest cost – about 2 per cent of global has proved to have serious fl aws. GDP – of providing the entire world’s poor with a minimum package of social benefi ts and services.2 This shows very forcefully that the objective of social security for all * The International Trade Union Confederation is not only a pressing need but one that is (ITUC) is the new organization formed in November 2006 by the amalgamation of the ICFTU (Interna- eminently attainable, provided the world’s tional Confederation of Free Trade Unions) and the decision-makers put their priorities in World Confederation of Labour. the right place. The ILO’s demonstration
37 would be reinforced if it were to show how demographic patterns between countries.4 the basic package it suggests would per- A particular challenge will be to ensure mit achieving several of the Millennium the access of migrant workers to social se- Development Goals (MDGs), notably the curity, and the international trade union MDGs related to minimum income, health movement believes the ILO can contribute and education objectives. Some organiza- more to achieving that objective. tions have done a total costing of achiev- In addressing various facets of the im- ing the MDGs and what is striking is the pact of globalization on social security, the relatively modest cost involved – only a ILO paper states that there is “some evi- small fraction of what some countries cur- dence that countries are currently engaged rently devote to military expenditures, for in tax competition” which undermines fi - example. Demonstrating how the ILO’s nancing of social security systems.5 A re- campaign on social security is central to cent ICFTU (International Confederation the attainment of the MDGs by 2015 would of Free Trade Unions)6 study demonstrates lead any sceptics to support the campaign convincingly the destructive impact of one more seriously. particular type of tax competition, that Another particularly cogent part of the concerning corporate income taxes.7 The ILO’s paper is the discussion on how sub- ICFTU in its publication suggests some stantial levels of social expenditure, high strategies for international organizations productivity and strong economic growth to resolve the problem or, as the ILO put are not only compatible, but also how the it in its consultation paper, “ways in which fi rst can reinforce the latter two.3 This eco- the global community might protect the nomic relationship is reinforced by the fi scal space of the nation State”.8 Some of complementary interaction between social these could include phasing out export security and the labour market. For exam- processing zones and other institutional ple, the paper notes that Denmark is the arrangements that give certain companies European country having both the high- tax advantages over other actors, taxing est level of social security expenditure and corporations where their workers are and the highest employment rate. This fl ies real value is added rather than in artifi cial in the face of those who claim that high tax havens, and establishing standards social expenditures are an employment that require multinational corporations to disincentive! refrain from harmful tax avoidance and An area in which the ILO could expand evasion. its analysis is the interaction between so- Appropriately, the ILO has affi rmed cial security and labour market institu- the primary role of the State as “the only tions. While the tax system and social se- institution that can formulate an over- curity expenditures play a crucial role in all national social security development providing income redistribution, this is plan”.9 This emphasis on the role of the but one facet of the decent work equation. State in social security provision, which Given the international role of the ILO in was also a strong point of the 2001 ILC ensuring respect for workers’ rights, the resolution, contrasts with the approach ILO should also spell out that the guar- taken by some international institutions, antee of fundamental workers’ rights most notably the World Bank. Such insti- through adequate labour market institu- tutions have put most of their emphasis tions, in combination with social security on reducing State responsibility for old- systems, are the key factors for ensuring age security and on shifting this “respon- equitable income distribution. sibility” in a large part to the private sec- In detailing some of the current and tor, often with unsatisfactory results (as future challenges to social security sys- discussed below). tems, the ILO paper notes the expecta- Unions welcome that the ILO consul- tion that labour migration will continue tation paper refrains from asserting that to intensify, in part to respond to differing in providing social security for all it is
38 necessary to destroy it for some who al- even the right-wing candidate agreed ready have it. Again, this contrasts with with the victorious Michelle Bachelet the approach of the Washington-based that the privatized system was costly, un- international fi nancial institutions (IFIs), fair and ineffi cient, and required a major which have put so much of their efforts overhaul.11 into reducing government commitments The ILO consultation paper lists a to current social security systems that they number of studies carried out by the have forgotten that, they too, have agreed ILO on World Bank-sponsored pension with the objective of extending social se- reforms in developing and transition curity to those not covered. There is no countries. In doing so the ILO notes the evidence that savings from reduced so- reforms’ many failures, including re- cial protection – or for that matter, from duced income security for those covered, lower wages or working conditions – in reduction of effective coverage for those the formal economy will automatically already covered, and lack of progress in transfer as increased benefi ts for workers extending coverage to those not previ- in the so-called informal economy. Yet ously covered.12 The trade union move- this is the simplistic approach one hears ment endorses all of these points and at times from the IFIs. If anything, the adds some others: existence of an adequate level of protec- high administrative costs in privatized tion for some workers is likely to create schemes; social and political pressures to provide improved social protection for those who the unpredictability of pension benefi ts are unprotected. paid out from the private funds; and the growing inequality between women and men under these schemes. The World Bank’s pension reform model Starting in the 1990s, trade unions in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, Satisfyingly, the ILO discussion paper the two regions where the World Bank deals head-on with the multi-pillar model was most active in trying to disengage the put forward by the World Bank. In reform- State from pension provision, were among ing the pension regimes of developing and the fi rst to call attention to the problems transition countries over the past several of the Bank-sponsored reforms. In 1998 in years, the World Bank has advocated and Slovenia, the unions waged a public cam- pushed a shift from public, defi ned-bene- paign highlighting the negative effects fi t schemes, fi nanced on a “pay-as-you- of pension privatization and managed to go” basis, to pre-funded defi ned contri- convince the government to roll back a bution schemes managed by the private Bank-sponsored reform that the govern- sector.10 The paper notes that Chile fi rst in- ment had agreed to implement. In 2001, troduced this new pension model during the ICFTU issued a statement which ex- the Pinochet regime and later, in 1994, the pressed alarm at the negative impact of World Bank declared that the model was the Bank-sponsored reforms: “the World relevant globally. Over the years, the Bank Bank’s haste to scale back or dismantle made some airlines happy by organizing public pension schemes is troublesome in multiple pilgrimages of pension admin- view of the high level of corruption and istrators from around world to Santiago, administrative costs associated with the Chile, to witness the glories of privatized privatized ‘multi-pillar’ schemes”.13 pensions. However these missions have The Bank initially rebuffed trade un- fallen off sharply in recent years since the ions when they attempted to raise these is- major fl aws of Chile’s privatized pension sues. The Bank’s attitude started changing system have become evident. In fact, dur- around 2003, when the Bank’s own inter- ing the 2006 presidential election in Chile, nal reports confi rmed the claims unions
39 had been making for years. The ILO’s showed, including the high administra- consultation paper cites a 2006 report of tive costs, the unpredictability of benefi ts the Bank’s Independent Evaluation Group and the failure to extend coverage.16 The that echoes many of the concerns of the new paper also largely abandoned one of ILO.14 An earlier report by the Bank’s Latin the Bank’s major but unproved arguments American department, the fi rst version of for shifting to pre-funded privatized which was issued in 2003, went even fur- schemes, namely that they offered better ther in declaring that the Bank’s priva- protection against demographic changes, tized schemes had failed to extend cover- i.e. an ageing workforce, than public “pay- age to the previously uncovered and had as-you-go” systems. The paper announced such high administrative costs that future that the Bank would adopt a more fl exible pension benefi ts would be drastically re- approach as to whether countries should duced. According to this report, the so- privatize their pension systems and stated called transition costs to the new systems that trade unions should be involved in had created serious new public sector li- all stages of pension reform processes. abilities in some countries, and overall, The latter constituted a refreshing change the much-vaunted fi nancial sector devel- from the Bank’s earlier attitude. In 2001, opment the reforms were supposed to in- for example, the Bank’s lead pensions spe- duce had not materialized.15 cialist told an international trade union delegation that the Bank would not com- mit to consulting unions on the reforms it A new World Bank approach? sponsored because “unions have nothing useful to say on pension reform”. Looking forward, there is some evi- However neither the announced fl ex- dence that the World Bank may fi nally ibility nor the intention to consult system- be budging from the dogmatic pro-pri- atically unions on pension reforms have vatization approach on pension reforms been incorporated into all of the Bank’s that it has taken for well over a decade. interventions to reform pension systems. Some, who point out the strong infl u- Some of the Bank’s current Country As- ence of the United States over the World sistance Strategies continue to push gov- Bank, have seen the shift as being due ernments to take steps to create partially to the spectacular defeat of US president privatized “multi-pillar” systems. In the George W. Bush’s proposal, launched in following telling passage, the Bank’s 2005 November 2004, to partially privatize the pension policy paper confi rms that Bank country’s public pension scheme, called staff are likely to persist in prioritizing the Social Security. The plan, for which the creation of a privately managed “second World Bank had offered a degree of moral pillar”, despite enunciated claims of tak- support, encountered such strong public ing a more fl exible approach: “Most Bank opposition that members of Congress staff see the potential economic benefi ts of from the president’s own Republican a multi-pillar scheme with a major second Party compelled Bush to abandon it in (mandated) or third (voluntary) funded mid-2005. However the shift within the pillar …”.17 World Bank has by no means been linear, As for the promise to consult trade un- and the Bank has certainly not lost its bias ions on pension reforms in which the Bank in favour of at least partial privatization is involved, there seems to be no consistent as the preferred option where political practice. In countries where progressive circumstances permit it. governments have been elected with the In 2005 the Bank issued a new pen- support of trade unions, the Bank has con- sion reform policy paper, Old-Age Income sulted unions on reforms, perhaps because Support in the 21st Century, which admit- the government gave the Bank no choice. ted many of the defi ciencies of the priva- Such is the case currently in Uruguay, for tized systems that the Bank’s own studies example. In other countries, however, the
40 Bank appears to continue the practice of not covered is that the Bank has prioritized consistently seeking the support of the fi - goals that have nothing to do with improv- nancial services industry, which stands to ing old-age security. It is remarkable that benefi t from pension privatization. But the the Bank’s latest pension policy paper, Old- Bank does not necessarily seek the views Age Income Security in the 21st Century, has of trade unions on pension reform, despite not yet abandoned the idea that one of the the fact that unions represent workers and main aims of pension reform should be to present and future retirees; in other words, help the fi nancial service industry develop. those directly affected by the reforms. This, in spite of the total lack of evidence, Nor has the World Bank placed any as confi rmed by the Bank’s own evalua- importance on collaborating with the ILO tions, that pension privatization has been on pension reform, despite the ILO’s long- a necessary condition for fi nancial market standing expertise in setting social se- development in any country. Despite re- curity standards and providing technical peated questions from trade unions, the advice. The Bank’s latest Social Protection World Bank has never offered a rationale Sector Strategy, which was launched in the as to why workers and retirees should be same year that the ILO’s annual conference forced, through the creation of privately devoted an important discussion to social managed “second-pillar” funds, to sacrifi ce security, not only completely ignored the part of their income to ineffi cient private- ILO’s role in social security system design sector administrators. Surely the ILO, by but boasted that the Bank had become the giving priority to improving old-age secur- “key player and recognized depository of ity systems in the interests of workers and knowledge on pension reform”.18 retirees rather than prioritizing unrelated The ILO could certainly play a much goals, can and should play a much more more infl uential role in putting forward important role in social security reform. alternative approaches to pension reform. As the 2001 International Labour Con- ference affi rmed, these activities should Notes consist of ILO technical cooperation with governments and social partners that 1 ILO, Social Security for All: Investing in Global puts a priority on goals such as “extend- Social and Economic Development. A Consultation (Ge- ing and improving social security cover- neva, 2006). For an abridged version of this paper, see pp. 21-35 of this issue. The full ILO consulta- age”, “developing innovative approaches tion paper is available at http://www.ilo.org/public/ in the area of social security to help peo- english/protection/secsoc/downloads/publ/1519sp1. ple to move from the informal economy pdf, to which the relevant footnotes below refer. to the formal economy” and “introducing 2 ibid., pp. 7-8. means to overcome discrimination in out- 3 ibid., pp. 11-14. 19 comes in social security”. None of these 4 ibid., p. 18. goals has been an important objective for 5 ibid., p. 19. the World Bank’s country-level interven- 6 Amalgamating partner in the newly formed tions in reforming pension systems. Even ITUC. if the Bank has stated its commitment to 7 ICFTU, Having their Cake and Eating it Too: The goals such as extending social security Big Corporate Tax Break (Brussels, 2006). coverage, major reviews by the Bank’s 8 ILO, op. cit., p. 31. Latin America department and the Inde- 9 ibid., p. 29. pendent Evaluation Group both show that 10 ibid., p. 20. the Bank never made them priorities in its 11 “Chile’s Candidates Agree to Agree on Pen- country-level work and therefore failed to sion Woes”, New York Times, 10 January 2006. achieve them. 12 ILO, op. cit., p. 20. Perhaps the principal reason why the 13 ICFTU, TUAC & ITS, Statement by the ICFTU, World Bank has not contributed more to TUAC and the ITS to the Spring Meetings of the IMF and extending social security coverage to those World Bank (Washington, April 2001), p. 8.
41 14 ILO, op. cit., p. 20. 17 ibid. 15 For more details on the internal World Bank 18 World Bank, Social Protection Sector Strat- debate on its pension reform policy see Peter Bakvis, egy: From Safety Net to Springboard (Washington, “Social security systems and the neo-liberal chal- 2001). lenge” in upcoming publication of the Deutsches In- 19 ILO: Report of the Committee on Social Security, stitut für Menschenrechte (Berlin). Record of Proceedings, International Labour Con- 16 World Bank, Old-Age Income Support in the 21st ference, 89th Session, Geneva, 2001, pp. 33-37; see Century: An International Perspective on Pension Sys- http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/ tems and Reform (Washington, 2005). relm/ilc/ilc89/pdf/pr-16.pdf.
42 Addressing the bases of insecurity of the Philippine social security system
The publicly-run Philippine Social Security System has reversed the trend of fund deficit through a combined strategy of improving ac- cessibility to self-employed workers and employers, targeting fraud and non-payment of contributions, and an increase in contributions, while also being able to increase benefits in 2006. With sustainability forecast to 2031, the Philippines demonstrates that privatization is not the sole solution to sustainability.
Melisa R. Serrano* University Extension Specialist U.P. School of Labor and Industrial Relations Philippines
Social security and growing is continuously faced with the problem of labour insecurities sustainability. Asher (1998) stresses that the SSS is unlikely to be sustainable in the The uncertainties brought about by glo- medium term if no signifi cant reforms are balization continue to threaten the Phil- undertaken to improve compliance levels, ippine Constitutional mandate to “afford increase tax rates or reduce benefi ts, lower protection to labor”. Social security is the ratio of administrative costs to contri- a key area in this protective mantle. As butions, and signifi cantly improve the rate the trend towards liberalization acceler- of return on investment. These areas along ates, workers all over the world are facing with issues of governance (or the need for greater insecurity of work. Standing (1999) more workers’ voice in the SSS) are the stresses that the era of fl exibility is also bases of insecurity of the SSS. an era of more generalized insecurity and precariousness, in which many more men as well as women have been pushed into Enabling urgent reforms through precarious forms of labor. Without doubt, the Republic Act 8282 the increasing fl exibility of work arrange- ments erodes traditional systems of social Taking cognizance of urgent reforms and security in the workplace. the need to adopt corrective measures to At the same time, the Philippine So- protect and strengthen the life of the social cial Security System (SSS), the state- security fund, the Philippines enacted the owned and operated social insurance pro- Republic Act 8282 (RA 8282) in 1997, which gramme for workers in the private sector, amended the original pension law of 1957. The enactment of RA 8282 was crucial to * This article is a revised and an updated ver- render social security schemes more rel- sion of the publication by Melisa R. Serrano and evant in the present socio-economic envir- Mary Leian C. Marasigan, 2003, The Bases of Insecur- onment. When the SSS was established in ity of the Social Security System. Quezon City: School 1957, the Philippines was at the threshold of Labor and Industrial Relations and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Acknowledgment is due to the Frie- of economic development, recognized as drich Ebert Stiftung-Philippine Offi ce for funding among the leading economies in Asia. support of the said publication. Jobs were abundantly available and the
43 economy was robust. But times have What has happened since? changed. The economy remains lacklus- An assessment of the impact tre, often stagnant, and insecure jobs are of the key changes increasingly becoming the norm. The enactment of RA 8282 has enabled Expanding membership coverage the SSS to take on certain measures to ad- dress major issues and problems confront- Pursuant to RA 8282, the SSS has been ing the system. RA 8282 empowered the moving towards universal coverage. As SSS to undertake the following reforms of June 2006, there were 26.4 million in- and adjustments (Amante et al., 1999: dividuals registered with the SSS (SSS pp. 33-38): web site) or 79 per cent of the total em- ployed (33.23 million) in July 2006. Of the Expand membership coverage to non- total membership, 20.9 million are private covered sectors, to include agricul- sector employees (including household tural workers who are not paid regu- helpers) and 5.5 million are self-employed lar daily wages or who do not work for workers and voluntary members (SEVM). an uninterrupted period of at least six Registered employers counted 774,040. months, household helpers, informal Included in the SEVM count are 533,859 sector workers, parents employed by registered OFW-members (Overseas Fili- children, and children of minor age pino Workers). The total number of SSS employed by parents. members who have become pensioners Enhance and rationalize the benefi ts due to retirement, disability and death is for its members, namely the age pen- 1,138,755 as of June 2006 (SSS web site). sion, the funeral benefi t, and the ma- Although the SSS reported a total ternity benefi t. membership of 26.4 million individuals in 2006, lumping together private sector em- Broaden investment alternatives and ployees, the self-employed and voluntary improve the management of its reserve members, and the employers, the decline fund. on the number of employee-members Impose stiffer penalties for violators of should be noted, from about 22.6 million the social security law. in 2000 to 20.976 million in 2006 (table 1). This is indicative of the growing trend of Enforce penalties on delinquent employment insecurity, particularly in the contributors. formal sector. Table 2 shows the decrease Establish a voluntary provident fund in the number of new registrants begin- for members. ning the year 2001. Nonetheless, the SSS reported an over- In the years that followed, the SSS adopted all increase in membership of 3 million various programmes and schemes to im- since 2001 (SSS web site). This was due to plement these reforms. However, the 1997 a number of strategies adopted by the SSS, fi nancial crisis, the political instability in namely: coverage drives, regional infor- the country, and the frequent change of mation seminars, and the setting up of the leadership in the SSS bogged down im- Employer/Self-employed Online Business plementation and at one point put the SSS Clearance System using point-of-service in clear danger. It was only in 2001 that (POS) terminals in local government units reforms and programmes started to be ac- for the issuance and renewal of business li- tively implemented. cences. The latter strategy is covered by an agreement of the SSS with the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) that Republic Act 8282 formalized. Overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) are beyond the scope of the country’s social
44 Table 1. SSS membership growth, 1998-2006
Year Employee-members Employers Percentage increase/(decline) Employee Employers
1998 20,164,123 547,400 5.7 2.0 1999 21,316,172 573,314 5.7 4.7 2000 22,621,038 600,182 6.1 4.7 2006 (June) 20,976,613 774,040 (7.3) 28.9
Source: SSS 1998, 1999, 2000 Annual Reports and www.sss.gov.ph.
Table 2. SSS coverage for the year (new registrants)
Year Number
2000 1,304,866 2001 901,834 2002 775,367 2003 743,201 2004 615,152 2005 561,250
Source: SSS 2005 Annual Report.
security law. Their membership to the SSS miums and loan accounts while they are is thus voluntary. Like the self-employed in an SSS offi ce, in view of the limited members, they too shoulder the employer hours provided by banks for the accept- and employee’s counterpart of the monthly ance of payments from SSS members. This contribution rate. To capture more OFWs affects especially the self-employed and under its umbrella, the SSS has adopted a voluntary members. There are currently two-pronged approach: (1) forging of bi- 41 tellering systems and the SSS reports lateral agreements on social security for that plans are afoot to add 169 tellering Filipino immigrants; and (2) setting up systems in 79 branches by 2006. Other foreign offi ces to promote its programmes payment schemes are likewise being put for land-based OFWs who are excluded in place, such as remittance through over from the social security schemes of their 600 Bayad Center payment facilities na- host countries (SSS 2005 Annual Report). tionwide, collection through third party The SSS nonetheless recognizes that mem- agents like LBC Express, payment through bership of the OFWs should be mandatory Philpost, use of self-service payment ter- to allow full protection for all OFWs. In minals in SSS branches, payment through this regard, the SSS is now pursuing a text-messaging, and payment through co- shift towards mandatory membership of operatives (SSS web site). OFWs. This may be part of another round There have been many cases of fraud of proposed amendments to RA 8282. in the claim of pensions, i.e. members Other initiatives were also under- who are already dead or have remarried, taken to improve member services and or been re-employed and who continue to contribution collection. A new payment claim pensions. To safeguard the funds, scheme called the branch tellering project the SSS implemented the Annual Con- was introduced in 2004. This scheme al- fi rmation of Pensioners (ACOP) Program lows members to directly pay their pre- to verify members’ identities and status.
45 The programme resulted in the suspen- robust contribution collections, sustained sion of some PHP2 billion in pension pay- investment earnings and tempered oper- ments and recovery of PHP723 million ating expenses. from accounts of pensioners who were The contribution rate, on the other confi rmed to have either died, remarried, hand, had been increased only four times or were re-employed (SSS web site). – in 1974, 1978, 1979, and 2003. The contri- bution rate has remained at 8.4 per cent since 1979 (SSS News and Updates, 31 Au- Expanding coverage, gust 2001). From March 2003, the total increasing liability: contribution rate went up by 1 percent- The benefits-contributions issue age point to 9.4 percent, of which 6.07 per cent is the employer’s counterpart and Concomitant with expanding membership 3.33 per cent the employee’s share. The coverage, the SSS aims to increase benefi t contribution increase was shouldered by levels. The SSS now provides an average the employers. Nonetheless, the SSS Pres- monthly pension of PHP2,546. To date, the ident, Mrs Corazon dela Paz, emphasized minimum monthly pension is PHP1,000 that although this contribution increase, and the maximum is PHP14,970. Since 1991, along with other initiatives, may have ex- self-employed farmers and fi shers with in- tended the life of the fund to 2031 from come between PHP1,500 and PHP18,000 the previous estimate of 2015, the current per annum are covered. With the inclu- 9.4 per cent contribution rate should be sion of the more marginalized sectors of gradually raised to at least 12.5 per cent workers in SSS coverage, the SSS will have to bring the SSS fund life back to perpe- to subsidize the benefi ts, particularly the tuity (SSS website). retirement pension that would be paid to Between 1999 and 2004, SSS benefi t these workers – a function of the social payments exceeded contributions collec- adequacy principle which means that the tion in view of the weak link between benefi ts paid provide a certain standard of the contribution rate vis-à-vis the bene- living to all contributors. fi t structure of the program (table 3). It The low-income groups receive rela- should be noted that the fund’s invest- tively larger retirement pensions than do ment earnings make up for any contri- other groups compared to their contribu- bution shortfall. Reforms undertaken in tions. According to Amante et al. (1999: the SSS helped remedy the imbalance and p. 17), in the SSS those who are in the enabled the SSS to make headway in re- lower income brackets benefi t more. The versing the defi cit into a surplus so that benefi t payments for the poorer groups the gap between contributions and bene- are much greater compared to the con- fi ts narrowed down from PHP7.6 billion tributions ratio for all income levels. For in 2001 to PHP0.9 billion in 2004. In 2005, example, given 15 years of service, the the SSS reported a record surplus of monthly retirement pension of a worker PHP1.3 billion, the fi rst in the last seven with a PHP1,000 average monthly salary is years (SSS web site). more than 14.2 times his/her monthly con- The SSS does not get any funding sub- tribution, but the monthly retirement pen- sidy from the government. Member con- sion for a worker with a PHP6,000 average tributions are the primary funding source monthly salary is more than 4.7 times his/ of benefi ts, so that SSS has been putting her monthly contribution. greater effort into increasing collections. Since its establishment in 1957, the SSS For the period 2001 to 2005, contribution has implemented 20 pension increases, the collection grew at an average of 10 per cent last being a 10 per cent increase in Septem- annually. According to the SSS, the steady ber 2006. This last pension increase was growth of contributions since 2002 was a made possible because of the improved result of several policy measures, most sig- fi nancial standing of the SSS as a result of nifi cant of which were:
46 Table 3. SSS benefits and contributions, 1997-2006 (in million pesos)
Year Benefits paid Contributions
1999 28,770.80 27,124.00 2000 34,479.51 30,320.53 2004 44,882.52 43,935.82 2005 46,269.82 47,602.07 2006 (June) 25,045.98 25,517.63
Source: SSS Annual Reports, 1998-2000 and www.sss.gov.ph.
Table 4. SSS investment ceilings
Area of investment Ceiling (%)
Private securities 40 Housing 35 Real-estate related investments 30 Short- and medium-term member loans 10 Government financial institutions and corporations 30 Infrastructure projects 30 Any particular industry 15 Foreign-currency denominated investments 7.5
Source: SSS Finance and Investments and Information Systems Group.