Equity Weekly
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections 2008 Elections Parliamentary of Chronicle Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections Volume 42
Couverture_Ang:Mise en page 1 22.04.09 17:27 Page1 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2008 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 42 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamen tary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the background and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distribution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU’s database on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 42 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2008 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2008 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 42 1 January - 31 December 2008 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2009 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22 919 -
Cambodia's Transition to Hegemonic Authoritarianism
Cambodia's Transition to Hegemonic Authoritarianism Author Morgenbesser, Lee Published 2019 Journal Title Journal of Democracy Version Version of Record (VoR) DOI https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0012 Copyright Statement © 2019 National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Journal of Democracy, Volume 30, Number 1, January 2019, pp. 158-171. Reprinted with permission by The Johns Hopkins University Press. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/386016 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au CAMBODIA’S TRANSITION TO HEGEMONIC AUTHORITARIANISM Lee Morgenbesser Lee Morgenbesser is a lecturer in comparative politics at the School of Government and International Relations of Australia’s Griffith Uni- versity. He is the author of Behind the Façade: Elections Under Au- thoritarianism in Southeast Asia (2016). Tragedy runs like a thread through the history of Cambodian politics. Since 1953, when the country gained its independence from France, it has endured four coups, three foreign invasions, one civil war, and a cataclysmic genocide carried out by the Communist Party of Kam- puchea (better known as the Khmer Rouge) between 1975 and 1979. Authoritarian rule has been a reliable accompaniment to this massive suffering—the genocide is thought to have killed as much as a quarter of the population—and unfair elections have in turn been a reliable ac- companiment to authoritarianism. Monarchs, military juntas, personal- ist dictators, and dominant parties have all repeatedly used such bogus elections to prolong their time in power. For eighteen months in 1992 and 1993, the United Nations intervened directly. -
How Political Parties Reacted and Adapted During Democratic Transitions in Cambodia, El Salvador and Mozambique
Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2013 Political Party Transitions in Post-Conflict States: How oliticalP Parties Reacted and Adapted During Democratic Transitions in Cambodia, El Salvador and Mozambique Rachel L. Miller Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Miller, Rachel L., "Political Party Transitions in Post-Conflict States: How oliticalP Parties Reacted and Adapted During Democratic Transitions in Cambodia, El Salvador and Mozambique" (2013). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 674. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/674 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL PARTY TRANSITIONS IN POST-CONFLICT STATES: HOW POLITICAL PARTIES REACTED AND ADAPTED DURING DEMOCRATIC TRANSITIONS IN CAMBODIA, EL SALVADOR AND MOZAMBIQUE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By RACHEL L. MILLER History B.A., Xavier University, 2006 2012 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL December 12, 2012 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Rachel L. Miller ENTITLED Political Party Transitions in Post-Conflict States: How Political Parties Reacted and Adapted During Democratic Transitions in Cambodia, El Salvador and Mozambique BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. -
ANFREL Cambodia 2008 Final Report
CAMBODIA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTION 27th July 2008 Report on the International Election Observation Mission by The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) Published by The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) 105 Suthisarnwinichai Road, Samsennok, Huaykwang, Bangkok 10320, Thailand Tel : (66 2) 2773627 Fax : (66 2) 2762183 E-mail : [email protected] Website : www.anfrel.org Written by Hana Krupanská and Marc Livsey, with inputs from all observers Edited by Mar Sophal and Adam Cooper Layout by Chatchawan Rakchat Photos courtesy of mission observers ISBN: 978-974-362-295-3 Printed in Bangkok, Thailand, October 2008 2 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................... 5 MAP ............................................................................................................. 6 ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 9 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 12 BASIC MISSION OVERVIEW ..................................................................... 12 OBSERVATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 13 COUNTRY OVERVIEW ........................................................................ 15 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................... 15 POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................... -
Cambodia Parliamentary Elections, 27 July 2008
PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN CAMBODIA ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION 24 – 29 July 2008 Report by Mr. Glyn Ford Chairman of the Delegation Annexes: A. List of participants B. Programme C. Press release by EU Election Observation Mission (29 July 2008) D. Preliminary statement of the EU Election Observation Mission (29 July 2008) E. Official election results 1 Introduction Following an invitation from the Royal Government of Cambodia, the Conference of Presidents decided at its meeting on 12 June 2008 to authorise the sending of a delegation of the European Parliament to observe the Cambodian National Assembly elections, which took place on 27 July 2008. The delegation was composed of seven Members appointed by the political groups in accordance with the rolling d'Hondt system (the list of participants is annexed to this report). As is usual, the European Parliament's delegation was fully integrated into the European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM), which was led by Mr Martin Callanan, MEP. This EOM opened its offices in Phnom Penh on 13 June 2008 and 44 long-term observers were deployed a week later in all 20 provinces and 4 municipalities, thus covering the 24 constituencies. On Election Day, some 130 EU observers were deployed throughout the country. The 2008 National Assembly elections were the fourth multi-party elections since the signing of the peace agreement in 1991. The previous elections in 2003 were also observed by a delegation of the European Parliament and Mr Glyn Ford was the Chairman on that occasion, too. A number of preparatory meetings took place in Brussels and Strasbourg before the EP delegation left, during which Members had the opportunity to examine the political situation in the country and decide on the most appropriate deployment plan. -
Principles of Conduct for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia
Principles of Conduct for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia The official copy of this document exists only in Khmer; this translation is for information purposes only. Preamble Free and fair elections are an essential part of democracy. Elections cannot be free and fair without the right to campaign. Everyone has this right, and the right to present their political opinions. But each person’s right to campaign means supporting the same freedom for everyone else. Cambodia’s political parties endorse the Principles of Electoral Conduct set out below. These reflect international standards, and do not replace any (NEC) Regulations and Procedures. They are part of the law on election of members of the National Assembly and amendment to this law, and seek to express the core of democratic elections, while also dealing with impressions reported by the parties and issues which have previously arisen in Cambodia. Observance of these Principles would help bring about free and fair – and internationally approved – elections in the Kingdom. Legal Framework All party members, candidates and citizens are equally subject to the law. However, the activities of government and party must clearly be separate. Thus: - Parties, candidates, and members may not use public funds or resources (e.g. offices, vehicles, etc.) to serve their own party interest. On the other hand, they must fulfill their public responsibilities until they leave office. - Publicly funded broadcasting stations must provide fair and equitable access for the parties. They will ensure accuracy and impartiality in reporting, as well as political balance in editorial decisions such as selection, placing and comment on news items. -
Year in Review 2006-2007
THE YEAR IN CAMBODIA: APRIL 2006 TO APRIL 2007 Table of Contents The Year in Politics -Overview -Land Disputes and Political Order -International Relations -The Undoing of Prince Ranariddh -New Legislation -New Political Parties -The Commune Elections -Political Futures and the Year to Come The Year in Business in Economics -Overview -Economic Growth -An Emerging Market in Resources -And a Spike in Foreign Investment -But Poverty Continues -The Tourism Trade -The World Bank Scandal -Corruption -The Battle Over Indochina Insurance -Controversial Concessions -Steps Toward Agricultural Privatization The Year in Human Rights -Overview -The Khmer Rouge Tribunal -A Crisis Over Land -Human Rights and the UN -Human Trafficking -The Heng Pov Affair -Unionists and Hit Men -Montagnards -Extra judicial Killings and Torture -Prisons -"Freedom Parks" and the Right to Assembly -Freedom of Expression -The 1997 Grenade Attack The Year in Culture -Overview -Siem Reap’s World Culture Expo -Archaeology at Angkor -The Koh Kong Shipwreck -Miss World -Rodin in Cambodia -Ghost Game -Religious Relations -Buddhism and the World -Maha Ghosananda -Television -The Sport’s Scene -Theater -The Water Festival -Architecture THE YEAR IN POLITICS Overview Two events in Cambodia between April 2006 and 2007 were of particular political importance: The decline and fall of former Funcinpec president and one-time prime minister Prince Norodom Ranariddh, and the discreet but steady rise in popularity of the opposition Sam Rainsy Party. In October, Prince Ranariddh was stripped of his position as Funcinpec president by his own party. And in March 2007, with less than a month to go until the April 1 commune council elections in which he hoped to compete, he was sentenced to 18 months in prison in absentia for selling Funcinpec's headquarters and buying new land registered in his own name. -
The 6 General Assembly of the International Conference of Asian Political Parties
The 6th General Assembly of the International Conference of Asian Political parties ICAPP/6GA/002 List of Participating Political Parties and Observers (Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Dec. 1-4, 2010) (As of Dec. 1, 2010) Political Parties in Asia (326) Afghanistan (1) 1. Islamic Party (Hizb-e Islami) (1) Armenia (1) 2. Heritage Party (Zharangutium) (1) Australia (1) 3. Liberal Party of Australia (1) Azerbaijan (5) 4. New Azerbaijan Party (2) 5. Motherland Party (Ana Vatan Partiyasti) (3) Bahrain (3) 6. Al Menbar National Islamic Society (3) Bangladesh (9) 7. Bangladesh Awami League (2) 8. Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) (2) 9. National Party Ershad (Jatiya Party Ershad) (3) 10. Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh (2) Bhutan (4) 11. Bhutan Peace and Prosperity Party (Druk Phuensum Tshogpa) (2) 12. People’s Democratic Party (2) Cambodia (*) 13. Cambodian People’s Party (Kanakpak Pracheachon Kampuchea) 14. Sam Rainsy Party (Kanakpak Sam Raeangsee) 15. Human Rights Party (Parti des droits de l’homme) 16. Norodom Ranariddh Party 17. FUNCINPEC Party 18. League for Democracy Party China (23) 19. Communist Party of China East Timor (1) 1 The 6th General Assembly of the International Conference of Asian Political parties 20. Revolutionary Front for an Independent East Timor (Frente Revolucionária do Timor-Leste Independente) India (7) 21. Indian National Congress (1) 22. Indian People's Party (Bharatiya Janata Party) (2) 23. Communist Party of India (2) 24. All India Forward Bloc (2) Indonesia (36) 25. Democratic Party (Partai Demokrat) (1) 26. Party of the Functional Groups (Partai Golongan Karya-GOLKAR) (14) 27. Indonesian Democratic Party-Struggle (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan) (10) 28. -
CAMBODIA's COMMUNE COUNCIL ELECTIONS a Human Rights Watch Backgrounder January 2002
CAMBODIA'S COMMUNE COUNCIL ELECTIONS A Human Rights Watch Backgrounder January 2002 As Cambodians head to the polls on February 3, for the first time ever they will be democratically electing their own local level representatives. For the last twenty years the leaders of Cambodia's 1,621 communes (administrative units consisting of four to seven villages) have been appointees of the ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP). They are now to be replaced with popularly elected commune councils and commune chiefs. As well as marking an important step in the development of democratic institutions in Cambodia, the commune elections will play a crucial role in setting the tone for national elections slated for July 2003. They will also be the first polls conducted during a time of relative peace, and thus could have important ramifications for Cambodian democracy, rule of law and human rights. The pre-campaign period has seen an increase in threats, killings, and other violence directed against opposition party candidates and supporters. Between January 1, 2001, and January 5, 2002, fifteen members of political parties running against the ruling CPP, most of whom were prospective or confirmed commune council candidates, have already been killed. 2001 has also seen allegations of widespread voter intimidation and vote buying conducted primarily by the ruling party. This backgrounder includes an overview of the Cambodian electoral process, provides details on human rights abuses in the run-up to the campaign, and assesses the government’s lack of effective response to date to reported incidents of political violence and intimidation. The backgrounder ends with concrete recommendations for the Cambodian government and the donor community. -
Final Assessment and Report on 2007 Commune Council Elections Table of Contents
Final Assessment and Report On 2007 Commune Council Elections # Oddar Meanchey Preah Vihear Ratanakiri # # Banteay Meanchey # Stung Treng # Siem Reab # Battambang # # Pailin Kampong Thom # Mondolkiri # Kratie # # Pursat # Kampong Chhnang Kampong Cham # Koh Kong Phnom Penh # # # # # Kampong Speu Prey Veng N Kandal Svay Rieng # # W E Takeo # Kampot S Sihanouk Ville # Kep# st April 1 , 2007 Final Assessment and Report on 2007 Commune Council Elections Table of Contents Acronyms 3 Foreword 4 1. Overall Assessment 5 1.1 Summary of principal findings 5 1.2 Introduction 10 1.3 Background and context 10 1.4 Executive summary 11 1.5 The gender and youth perspectives 15 1.6 What others say 15 1.7 Overall conclusion: Cambodia’s “Winner Takes All” Democracy? 17 2. Legal Framework 18 3. Elections and the Related Political Environment 26 3.1 Pre-election campaign environment 26 3.2 Election campaign environment 28 3.3 Cooling-off period, polling/counting day 30 4. NEC Restructuring, Recruitment of Electoral Commissions and Performance 32 4.1 Responsibilities of the NEC 32 4.2 Recruitment of election officials 34 4.3 Restructuring the NEC 34 5. Election Process 36 5.1 Voter registration 36 5.2 Registration of political party candidates 41 5.3 VIN Phase II and NEC bureaucratic problems 45 5.4 Campaigning 45 5.5 Cooling off and polling day 48 5.6 Vote counting and results 50 5.7 Recommendations 51 6. Media Monitoring 52 6.1 Electronic media 52 6.2 Print media 55 6.3 Media monitored only for violations 55 7. Complaints and Complaint Solving 56 7.1 Complaint-solving process 56 7.2 Complaints about ballot counting and polling 57 8. -
Final Version of Cambodia Final Report
Kingdom of Cambodia FINAL REPORT National Assembly Elections, 27 July 2008 13 October 2008 EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION .This report was produced by the EU Election Observation Mission and presents the EU EOM’s findings on the 27 July 2008 National Assembly Elections in the Kingdom of Cambodia. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. EU Election Observation Mission, Cambodia, 27 July 2008 Final Report on the National Assembly Elections TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 5 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND 5 IV. LEGAL ISSUES 10 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 15 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION 19 VII. PARTY AND CANDIDATE LIST REGISTRATION 22 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN AND PRE-ELECTION ENVIRONMENT 23 IX. MEDIA AND THE ELECTIONS 30 X. PARTICIPATION OF CIVIL SOCIETY 37 XI. PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN 37 XII. PARTICIPATION OF MINORITIES 39 XIII. ELECTION DAY 42 XIV. RESULTS 45 XV. RECOMMENDATIONS 45 Annexes A. MEDIA MONITORING RESULTS B. ANALYSIS OF ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN RELATED COMPLAINTS C. ANALYSIS OF ELECTION DAY COMPLAINTS D. ANALYSIS OF PROVISIONAL ELECTION RESULTS COMPLAINTS E. OFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS EU Election Observation Mission, Cambodia, 27 July 2008 1 Final Report on the National Assembly Elections I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EU EOM Mission Elections for the 123 Members of the National Assembly took place on 27 July 2008. Following an invitation from the Royal Government of Cambodia the European Union (EU) decided to establish an Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) to Cambodia. -
Opposition Parties and Elite Co-Optation in Electoral Autocracies
INSTITUTE Opposition Parties and Elite Co-optation in Electoral Autocracies Berker Kavasoglu May 2021 Working Paper SERIES 2021:120 THE VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) is a new approach to conceptualization and measurement of democracy. The headquarters – the V-Dem Institute – is based at the University of Gothenburg with 23 staff. The project includes a worldwide team with 5 Principal Investigators, 19 Project Managers, 33 Regional Managers, 134 Country Coordinators, Research Assistants, and 3,500 Country Experts. The V-Dem project is one of the largest ever social science research-oriented data collection programs. Please address comments and/or queries for information to: V-Dem Institute Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Sprängkullsgatan 19, Box 711 405 30 Gothenburg Sweden E-mail: [email protected] V-Dem Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.v-dem.net. Copyright ©2021 by authors. All rights reserved. Opposition Parties and Elite Co-optation in Electoral Autocracies Berker Kavasoglu∗ Abstract Autocratic incumbents often attempt to co-opt select opposition party leaders to minimize threats to their rule. While the literature identifies co-optation of opposition party leaders as an important survival strategy of autocrats in electoral autocracies, we lack a systematic examination of why some opposition party leaders are co-opted but not others. This article argues that opposition party co-optation is shaped by both inter- and intra-party dynamics. Using a novel data set on opposition party organizations in electoral autocracies between 1970 and 2019, I show that opposition parties with high mobilizational capacity and those that devolve internal decision-making authority from the party leadership to lower cadres are less likely to be co-opted, especially when they are ideological distant from autocratic incumbents.