DOCSLIB.ORG

Document Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Document Appendix Document Appendix: NVLSP And VLSC White Paper Confirming That Veterans Who Served in Guam from 1958-1980 Were Likely Exposed to Dioxin-Containing Herbicide Agents Including Agent Orange Part 1 February 12, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS This appendix provides a selection of sources cited in the National Veterans Legal Services Program (NVLSP) and Veterans Legal Services Clinic at Yale Law School (VLSC) white paper. Additional sources are not reproduced here due to copyright restrictions. Part 1 1. NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, VETERANS AND AGENT ORANGE: UPDATE 11 (2018) .......................................... 1 2. Andersen AFB’s Legacy: Operation Linebacker II (2017) (DoD Publication) ................................................. 3 3. Take Fire, Add Water, Get Huge Water Shortage (1969) (DoD Publication) ................................................ 6 4. Fire Threat Still Remains (1969) (DoD Publication) ...................................................................................... 7 5. EPA SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION: ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE (2003) ............................................................ 8 6. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) PHASE 1: RECORDS SEARCH ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM (1985) ...................................................................................................................................... 15 7. HAZARDOUS WASTE: DOD INSTALLATIONS IN GUAM HAVING DIFFICULTY COMPLYING WITH REGULATIONS 12 (1987) .. 25 8. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: GUAM CLEANUP OF URUNO [sic] BEACH (1987) ................................ 53 9. No. 10-21 420, 2013 WL 6992004 (BVA Nov. 14, 2013) ............................................................................. 57 10. UDT Men Stage Big Blow-up on NCS Beach: Deep Hole Dug by Explosives (1968) (DoD Publication) ....... 61 11. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) PHASE 1: RECORDS SEARCH ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM (1985) ...................................................................................................................................... 62 12. U.S. DEP’T HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVS., PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE GUAM (2002) ....................................................................................................................................... 75 13. DIOXIN FACTS (1984) ..................................................................................................................................... 80 14. FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION FOR IRP SITE 78 (2010) .................................................................................... 82 15. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT/SITE INSPECTION WORK PLAN FOR IRP SITES 56, 57, 58, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, AND 76 AT NORTHWEST FIELD (2006) ................................................................................................... 87 16. No. 11-23 141, 2015 WL 6946958 (BVA Sept. 24, 2015) ............................................................................ 97 Part 2 17. No. 14-04 080, 2016 WL 2648416 (BVA Mar. 3, 2016) ............................................................................ 100 18. No. 04-07 278, 2013 WL 6575790 (BVA Oct. 30, 2013) ............................................................................ 105 19. Foster Aff, Sept. 15, 2009 ......................................................................................................................... 114 20. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF SURPLUS NAVY PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN THE GUAM LAND USE PLAN (GLUP ’94) (1999) ............................................................................................... 119 21. SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW OF RECORD OF DECISION FOR MARBO ANNEX OPERABLE UNIT, USAF INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (2009) .................................................................................................................... 125 22. Moyer Aff. ¶ 11, Jan. 24, 2017 ................................................................................................................. 143 23. GAO-19-24, AGENT ORANGE: ACTIONS NEEDED TO IMPROVE ACCURACY AND COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION ON TESTING AND STORAGE LOCATIONS (2018) ...................................................................................................... 145 24. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHEMICAL CONTROL OF DISEASE VECTORS AND ECONOMIC PESTS (1974) ......................... 249 25. WESTON SOLUTIONS, GUAM CHLORINATED HERBICIDES INVESTIGATION (2020) ………………………………………………….262 26. U.S. NAVY, GUAM SOIL CONSERVATION SERIES NO. 2 (1958) ………………………………………………………………………..269 Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 11 (2018) BACKGROUND 27 in mortality profiles between men and women, and the information provided by Kang and colleagues may not necessarily apply to the majority of American Viet- nam veterans who are male. VA informed the committee that an updated mortality study was underway as of 2017 (Davey, 2017), but no results were available at the time the committee completed its work. MILITARY USE OF HERBICIDES IN VIETNAM Military use of herbicides in Vietnam took place from 1962 through 1971. Specific herbicides were selected based on tests conducted in the United States and elsewhere that were designed to evaluate defoliation efficacy (IOM, 1994; Young and Newton, 2004). Four compounds were used in the herbicide formula- tions in Vietnam: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D); 2,4,5-trichlorophen- oxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T); 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram); and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA, or cacodylic acid). These herbicides were used to defoliate inland hardwood forests, coastal mangrove forests, cultivated lands, and zones around military bases. Whereas the chlorinated phenoxy acids 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T persist in soil for only a few weeks, picloram is much more stable and can persist in soil for years, and cacodylic acid is nonvolatile and stable in sunlight (NRC, 1974). More details on the herbicides used are presented in Chapter 4. However, other toxic compounds were also present in these herbicide formu- lations. Specifically, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), which includes 75 different congeners that vary by the number and placement of the chlorine atoms, can be formed during the manufacture of 2,4,5-T and the half-lives of these in subsurface soil may exceed 100 years (Sinkkonen and Paasivirta, 2000). One contaminant of particular concern is 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). This compound is an unintentional byproduct of the production of 2,4,5- trichlorophenol (NRC,1974). The structures of the chemicals of interest (COIs) identified above are shown in Figure 2-1. Herbicides were identified by the color of a band on 55-gallon shipping con- tainers and were called Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Orange, Agent White, and Agent Blue. Table 2-2 shows the herbicides used in Vietnam by color code name and summarizes the chemical constituents, concentration of active ingredients, years used, and estimated amount sprayed, based on original and revised estimates. Two different formulations of Agent Orange were used in the course of military operations in Vietnam. All agents were liquid except Agent Blue, which was used in powder form in 1962–1964 and as a liquid in 1964–1971. Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Orange, and Agent Orange II all contained 2,4,5-T and were contaminated to some extent with TCDD. Agent White contained 2,4-D and picloram. Agent Blue (powder and liquid) contained cacodylic acid. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 2 Andersen AFB's Legacy: Operation Linebacker II By Jeffrey N. Meyer, 36th Wing Historian / Published December 18, 2017 ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam -- Thirty-nine years ago, Andersen Air Force Base became involved in Operation Linebacker II, an operation that would arguably be the most significant event in the installations long and distinguished history. Andersen AFB became the site of the most immense buildup of air power in history. More than 12,000 Airmen and 153 B-52s took up five miles of ramp space on the flight line. This article is about the operation that had many names, to include "The Eleven Day War", "11 Days of Christmas", "December Raids or Bombings" and "The Christmas Bombings"- but whatever moniker is used, it boils down to the massive bombing effort of North Vietnam from December 18-29, 1972. For there to be an Operation Linebacker II there must have been a Linebacker I. The first operation was in response to the "Easter Offensive" when North Vietnamese Army invaded South Vietnam. From May 9 to Oct. 23, 1972, units of the Air Force and Navy bombed targets in throughout North Vietnam. Although the B- 52s were minimally used in these northern bombings they continued their traditional Arc Light missions of bombing Vietcong positions south of the Seventeenth Parallel. As part of the build-up for Linebacker I, Strategic Air Command (SAC) launched Operation Bullet Shot, which sent 124 more B-52s from bases in the U.S. to Guam; bringing the total B-52 strength available for operations in Southeast Asia to 207. One hundred fifty three B-52s were at Andersen AFB (55 B-52Ds and 98 B-52Gs) and another 54 B-52Ds were based at U-Tapao, Thailand. Over 12,000 airmen on Guam were packed into the dorms, with spill-overs residing in temporary steel dorms called Tin City. Canvas Courts, a collection of tent shelters and available off base hotels, and even the base gymnasium were converted to living quarters to house all of the Airmen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intellipedia-Operationpocketmoney
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 105679A 12 December 2018 JOHN GREENEWALD 27305 W LIVE OAK ROAD SUITE #1203 CASTAIC CA 91384 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 11 November 2018, for Intellipedia pages on Operation Pocket Money. As stated in our initial response dated 26 November 2018, your request was assigned Case Number 105679. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD. Intellipedia pages are living documents that may be originated by any user organization, and any user organization may contribute to or edit pages after their origination.
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Is Beefing up Operations at Andersen Air Force Base and Throughout the Marianas
    ccess is the name of the game for security in the Pacific. For airmen, this access hinges on Guam. Guam is an American pos- session—US soil. While there are many other desirable bas- Aing locations in the western Pacific, Guam—nearly 220 square miles of sov- ereign American territory about 3,900 miles west of Hawaii—is the only one where basing rights will never be an issue. Andersen Air Force Base, at the north- ern tip of the island, is a historic instal- lation. The main runway is famous for its dip in the center, an ocean cliff at the end, and its white color—radiating from crushed coral mixed in the concrete. Andersen hosted US combat aircraft in World War II and throughout the Vietnam War and the Cold War. For the last 10 years, USAF has been increasing its presence on Guam. So has the Navy, which homeports submarines there, and plans call for some Marine Corps aviation and ground units from Okinawa to move to a new home on the island. The strategic importance of Guam extends to other territories in the Marianas island chain such as Tinian and Saipan. President Obama’s Asia-Pacific rebal- ance leans heavily on Guam for access, transient staging, and presence. “What many people do not realize is that it sits at the tip of the spear for the defense of our nation and is woven into the strategic fabric of the Pacific theater,” noted Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D- Tex.) in 2009. The Guam Hub Before airpower, the Northern Mari- anas were the site of Spanish imperial stopovers and Japanese occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chemical War Without End: Agent Orange in Vietnam
    A Chemical War without End: Agent Orange in Vietnam Marie-Hélène Lavallard* The Vietnam War (1961-1975) is known for the massive bombings of North Vietnam. More insidious, however, yet less well-known to the general public, was the chemical war waged from 1961 to 1971against South Vietnam. An immense environmental disaster and a human catastrophe taking numerous forms: health, economic, socio-cultural …, it had dramatic consequences which are still felt today. The American government and the chemical companies involved have eluded their responsibilities. For years, a conspiracy of silence has obscured the toxicity of the defoliants used. Those responsible have the effrontery to continue denying it today. Humanitarian aid is incommensurate with the needs. It is at the government level that support for Vietnam must be organized and the demand for just reparations must be made. During the Vietnam War, from 1961 to 1971, American aviation sprayed defoliants over Southern Vietnam to chase from the jungle the combatants taking shelter there, to cut the Ho Chi Minh trail by which weapons, supplies and medication came down from the North, to facilitate surveillance of roads, coastlines and waterways and to destroy the rice paddies, forcing villagers into "strategic hamlets" and thus depriving the guerillas of food and aid1. More than 77 million2 liters of defoliants were released by plane (95%), by helicopter, by boat, by tanker truck, and by men with backpack sprayers. More than 2,500,000 hectares were contaminated by these defoliants, the best known of which is Agent Orange. It contains dioxin, one of the most violent and most indestructible poisons known.
    [Show full text]
  • Agent Orange Understand the VA Claims Process
    The American Legion FILING A VA CLAIM CONTACT INFORMATION The American Legion offers a free Claims Coach • The American Legion National Headquarters, app that helps veterans and their surviving spouses 202-861-2700 (Washington Office) legion.org Agent Orange understand the VA claims process. The app’s step- • Department of Veterans Affairs VA Benefits Call by-step process allows users to find a service officer Center, 800-827-1000 Benefits&Programs nearby, create a checklist, set appointment remind- • VA Health Care, 877-222-8387 ers and manage claims. To download the app, visit A guide for those who served in Vietnam, legion.org/mobileapps. • Agent Orange updates and information Korea and Thailand, and their families va.gov/agentorange The Claims Coach can also be accessed via computer by going to legion.org/mobileapps and clicking on “use the SPINA BIFIDA CONTACTS Claims Coach on your desktop.” • Veterans Health Administration (VHA) 800-733-8387 To locate an accredited American Legion Department Service Officer, go to legion.org/serviceofficer. • Shriners Hospital for Children 800-237-5055 or shrinershq.org ELIGIBILITY FOR AGENT ORANGE RELATED JOIN THE LEGION HEALTH CARE A Vietnam-era herbicide-exposed veteran does not have At about 2 million strong, The American Legion is the largest veterans service organization in the world. to be rated service-connected to be eligible for Agent Every day, The American Legion works for veterans, Orange related health care. A Vietnam-era herbicide-ex- their families and the communities in which they live. posed veteran is eligible notwithstanding that there is in- To join The American Legion, please visit legion.org/join.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States' Chemical Defoliant Use During the Vietnam War and Its
    ABSTRACT OATSVALL, NEIL SHAFER. War on Nature, War on Bodies: The United States’ Chemical Defoliant Use During the Vietnam War and Its Consequences. (Under the direction of Matthew Morse Booker.) During most of the Vietnam War, from 1961-1971, the United States military sprayed chemical defoliants on a significant part of the Vietnamese environment in order to gain a military advantage. US forces used these chemicals in an attempt to substitute technology and financial resources for manpower to triumph over a relatively technologically deficient enemy. This effort, dubbed “Operation Ranch Hand,” wrought incredible destruction not only on Vietnam’s natural setting, but also on everyone involved; Vietnamese and American, civilian and soldier. This work examines the consequences of defoliation, and aims to show that those outcomes proved more severe in both scale and efficacy than any anticipated results. It differs from previous studies by combining environmental, military, medical, and cultural factors and considering them as interrelated. Whenever possible this study also tries to bring in a Vietnamese perspective, though that is often impossible due to a lack of available evidence in English. In this war, the United States treated not only the Vietnamese Communists as enemies but also assaulted the natural environment as foe. The interconnections forged during this complicated interpretation of nature and enemy are essential to the study of Operation Ranch Hand and chemical defoliation operations. Nature mattered to both sides, and an
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet 8: the Use of Defoliants – Agent Orange
    Fact Sheet 8: The use of defoliants – Agent Orange A highly controversial aspect of the Vietnam War was the widespread use of herbicides by the United States military. These chemicals caused the leaves of trees in the jungle to die. This made it easier to detect enemy positions and activities, especially from the air. Crops were also sprayed to deprive the enemy of food. These chemicals included the ‘Rainbow Herbicides’ – Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Blue, Agent White and, most famously, Agent Orange. The US Air Force sprayed approximately 75 million litres (of which Agent Orange accounted for about 45 million litres) of concentrated herbicides, affecting an estimated 13% of South Vietnam's land. Humans exposed to Agent Orange were at risk of poisoning. Some estimates suggest that there were as many as 4 million victims of dioxin poisoning in Vietnam. Veterans of the war observed an increased risk of various types of cancer, while birth defects among their children were cited as evidence of the long-term harm caused by Agent Orange. The US government denied any conclusive scientific links between Agent Orange and health problems experienced by those exposed. In 1984 US veterans obtained a $180 million settlement from companies which produced Agent Orange. A small trust fund for New Zealanders who had been exposed was established as part of this settlement, but the fund was exhausted before the health problems of many veterans became apparent. The New Zealand government initially stated that no New Zealanders were deployed in areas where defoliants were used. A 2001 report found no evidence that exposure to defoliants had affected the health of veterans' children, although it did bring new evidence of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRCRAFT Into Flames and Plummeted out of Control Toward the Ground
    activation, training, and deployment to the Pacific Theater of Operation (PTO). Chapter Three emphasizes the combat operations of the 315th during the months it was based in the PTO. Finally, Chapter Four summarizes the significance of the strategic air campaign against Japan and the 315th's contribution to that effort. The history of the 315th BombWing is closely linked to the story of the B-29 aircraft Make them the biggest, gun them the flown by the unit and to the mission of the Twentieth Air heaviest, and fly them the farthest! Force, the parent unit of the 315th in the PTO. A brief General H. H. Arnold discussion follows to highlight these relationships. The B-29, struck by the intense flak, suddenly burst THE AIRCRAFT into flames and plummeted out of control toward the ground. The Japanese searchlights had found the B-29 hidden in the night sky, and the antiaircraft batteries quickly inflicted their General Henry H. Arnold spearheaded the develop­ mortal wound on the American heavy bomber. Captain ment of the B-29 aircraft. As early as 1939, Gen Arnold Kenneth Dougherty, an aircraft commander in another B-29 pursued the development of a very long-range, very heavy that night, gave his account of the incident. bomber in anticipation of future air power requirements. At landfall there were four or five planes together. One Our B-29 idea come to birth in those days when it appeared stayed right with us all the way in. He was slightly ahead atthat England would go down to defeat, and there'd be no 1 o'clock.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo/ISSF Forum on “Audience Costs and the Vietnam War”
    H-Diplo | ISSF Forum, No. 3 (2014) A production of H-Diplo with the journals Security Studies, International Security, Journal of Strategic Studies, and the International Studies Association’s Security Studies Section (ISSS). http://issforum.org H-Diplo/ISSF Editors: James McAllister and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo/ISSF Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Commissioned for H-Diplo/ISSF by James McAllister Introduction by James McAllister H-Diplo/ISSF Forum on “Audience Costs and the Vietnam War” Published by H-Diplo/ISSF on 7 November 2014 Stable URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Forum-3.pdf Contents Introduction by James McAllister, Williams College ................................................................ 2 Essay by Marc Trachtenberg, University of California, Los Angeles ......................................... 6 Essay by Bronwyn Lewis, University of California, Los Angeles .............................................. 43 Comments by Richard K. Betts, Columbia University ............................................................. 70 Comments by Robert Jervis, Columbia University .................................................................. 75 Comments by Fredrik Logevall, Cornell University ................................................................. 80 Comments by John Mearsheimer, University of Chicago ....................................................... 86 © 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. H-Diplo/ISSF Forum, No. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Agent Orange Review
    Agent Orange Review Vol. 9, N0. 3 Information for Veterans Who Served in Vietnam September 1992 National Academy of Sciences Project Secretary Edward J. Derwinski Advances on the Agent Orange Issue: VA was cast as the enemy of the veteran. VA had absolutely no credibility on this issue. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is making Finally, in recent months, substantial progress on the Agent Orange project undertaken on we began to defuse much of the behalf of VA early this year. NAS officials have been gathering criticism and suspicion by herbicide literature from VA (including VA's 18-volume granting service connection for literature review) and other sources, making contact with conditions science tells us may scientists and other interested parties throughout the country, have been caused by exposure to and assembling a committee of experts to complete the project Agent Orange--such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft envisaged by Congress in Public Law 102-4, the "Agent tissue sarcomas. Orange Act of 1991." We're still being criticized by some who think we haven't gone far enough, and by some who feel there's not sufficient scientific proof for the decisions we have made. The public reaction~and the general lessening of Initial Committee Meeting tensions~seems to indicate we're right. This may be an important lesson for VA... The NAS Institute of Medicine's Committee to Review Committee Membership the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides held its first meeting on June 26, in Washington, DC. The Committee is chaired by Harold Fallon, M.D., Chair The morning session, which was opened to invited guests and of the Department of Medicine of the Medical College of speakers, was devoted to providing Committee members with Virginia in Richmond, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of US Vietnam Relations, Timeline
    Timeline Timeline 1930-1949 Chronology of U.S -Vietnam Relations 1950-1959 1930 1960-1969 Indochinese Communist Party, opposed to French rule, organized by Ho Chi Minh and his followers. 1970-1979 1932 1980-1989 Bao Dai returns from France to reign as emperor of Vietnam under the French. 1990-1999 September, 1940 Japanese troops occupy Indochina, but allow the French to continue their colonial adminstration of 2000- the area. Japan's move into southern part of Vietnam in July 1941 sparks an oil boycott by the U.S. Characteristics of the Vietnam and Great Britain. The resulting oil shortage strengthens Japan's desire to risk war against the U.S. War and Britain. Vietnam Related News & 1945 Opinion An OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) team parachutes into Ho Chi Minh's jungle camp in northern Vietnam and saves Ho Chi Minh who is ill with malaria and other tropical diseases. Ho Chi Minh August, 1945 Japan surrenders. Ho Chi Minh establishes the Viet Minh, a guerilla army. Bao Dai abdicates after a general uprising led by the Viet Minh. September, 1945 Seven OSS officers, led by Lieutenant Colonel A. Peter Dewey, land in Saigon to liberate Allied war prisoners, search for missing Americans, and gather intelligence. September 2, 1945 Ho Chi Minh reads Vietnam's Declaration of Independence to end 80 years of colonialism under French rule and establish the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in Hanoi. Vietnam is divided north and south. General Vo Nguyen Giap September 26, 1945 OSS Lieutenant Dewey killed in Saigon, the first American to be killed in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Viet. Assoc. for Victims of Agent Orange V. Dow Chem. Co., 517 F.3D 104 (2D Cir
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu The Honorable Roger J. Miner ’56 Papers Circuit Court Opinions 2009 Viet. Assoc. for Victims of Agent Orange v. Dow Chem. Co., 517 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2008) (holding that district court lacked jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute to consider the claims of a Vietnam nonprofit group and Vietnam nationals for injuries allegedly sustained from exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War, that state law claims were barred by the government contractor defense and the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied extraterritorial injunctive relief), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1218 (2009). Roger J. Miner Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions Recommended Citation Miner, Roger J., "Viet. Assoc. for Victims of Agent Orange v. Dow Chem. Co., 517 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2008) (holding that district court lacked jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute to consider the claims of a Vietnam nonprofit group and Vietnam nationals for injuries allegedly sustained from exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War, that state law claims were barred by the government contractor defense and the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied extraterritorial injunctive relief), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1218 (2009)." (2009). Circuit Court Opinions. 17. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Honorable Roger J. Miner ’56 Papers at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Circuit Court Opinions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Roffer, Michael 8/5/2015 For Educational Use Only Vietnam Ass'n for Victims of Agent Orange v.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereinafter “IOM Agent Orange Review”]
    The Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization YAL E L A W S C H O O L January 18, 2014 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Wesley T. Carter, Major, USAF Retired Chair, The C-123 Veterans Association 2349 Nut Tree Lane McMinnville, Oregon 97128 Dear Major Carter, On behalf of the C-123 Veterans’ Association, you have asked us to consider whether existing medical and scientific evidence satisfies the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (“VA”) legal standard for “actual exposure” to herbicide agents such that veterans who served on C-123 aircraft (also referred to as UC-123K) between 1972 and 1982, which were used to spray Agent Orange and other tactical herbicides in Vietnam, are eligible for presumptive service connection for disability compensation benefits. We are pleased to provide our legal opinion on this question. We conclude that existing evidence indicates that C-123 veterans satisfy the legal standard for “actual exposure” to tactical herbicides. These veterans are thus entitled to presumptive service connection for listed diseases. Because those veterans who served on C-123 aircraft formerly used to spray Agent Orange and other tactical herbicides can prove actual exposure, by law and regulation they need not demonstrate that they served in the Republic of Vietnam, nor are they required to present evidence bearing on “bioavailability” of herbicides, the duration or magnitude of their exposure, or any other criteria. Under existing medical and scientific evidence, service on C-123 aircraft used to spray Agent Orange satisfies the VA’s standard for actual exposure to herbicides. Thus, veterans who served on such aircraft and who have a disease listed as service-connected for exposure to tactical herbicides are entitled to disability benefits on that basis.
    [Show full text]