Service Updates Due to COVID-19 Outbreak | Posted on August 31, 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Service Updates Due to COVID-19 Outbreak | Posted on August 31, 2021 Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 Updates are highlighted. At FedEx and TNT, we are always evaluating how to optimize our operations to meet our customers’ expectations. COVID-19 has disrupted supply chains globally, and air cargo capacity is extremely constrained. To continue providing the best possible service for our customers, we are making several adjustments to our services and transit times globally. Please note that the information is subject to change without prior notice due to the dynamic nature of the COVID-19 situation. Temporary suspension of FedEx Express Money-Back Guarantee The impact of COVID-19 is causing local, state, and national governments around the world to issue work and travel restrictions on a daily basis, which are impacting our ability to meet our high standards of service. As a result, Money-back guarantee (MBG) has been temporary suspended for all FedEx Express service till further notice. Temporary signature suspension for delivery For the safety and well-being of our couriers and customers, FedEx and TNT signature guidelines are temporarily adjusted for all shipments within APAC with some exceptions. In efforts to minimize physical interactions, our couriers will now only seek verbal confirmation of delivery for most shipments. This means that your recipients will not be asked to sign for most deliveries, until further notice. Submission of export declaration documents for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) shipments outbound from China When planning your PPE export shipments from China, please note that shippers have to provide all required export declaration documents to complete clearance process within 5 working days from the date of pick-up. If shippers fail to provide all required export declaration documents within the 5 working days period, FedEx and TNT China will return the PPE export shipments to the shippers. Personal shipments do not have the above restrictions at this moment. Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 1 Information is subject to change without prior notice Temporary service suspension and restrictions Note: Selected FedEx and TNT Economy services from APAC remain temporarily suspended, kindly refer to the service impact table below for more details. Effective Origin Destination Affected service Service Impact period Outbound from APAC ▪ APAC, except for: ▪ Worldwide ▪ All TNT Services, Temporary service March 28, - TNT S87/ S88 (Air except for: suspension 2020 till Freight D2D/ - TNT Express further notice D2A) from Taiwan China to France, - TNT Economy Express Germany, Italy, between Singapore, Switzerland and Malaysia, Thailand and UK Vietnam - TNT Economy Express between Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea - TNT Global Cross Border Economy (GCBE) between China, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore - TNT Special Services ▪ APAC, except for: ▪ APAC ▪ FedEx International Temporary service April 1, 2020 - Economy shipments ▪ Canada Economy (IE) suspension till further between Singapore ▪ Latin America ▪ FedEx International notice and Malaysia ▪ U.S. Economy - Economy shipments DirectDistribution between Australia (IED) and New Zealand ▪ FedEx International - Economy shipments Economy Freight (IEF) from Thailand to Malaysia and Singapore (effective January 1, 2021) ▪ APAC, except for: ▪ Europe ▪ FedEx International Temporary service November 30, - China Economy (IE) suspension 2020 till further - Hong Kong SAR ▪ FedEx International notice China Economy Freight (IEF) ▪ FedEx International Economy DirectDistribution (IED) Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 2 Information is subject to change without prior notice Effective Origin Destination Affected service Service Impact period ▪ American Samoa ▪ Worldwide ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service March 25, 2020 services suspension till further notice ▪ China ▪ Worldwide ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service September 11, [shipments from the services suspension of pick- 2021 till following Out of up service further notice Pickup Area (OPA) zip codes in Xianyou District, Putian city in Fujian Province only - 351200 - 351253 - 351254 - 351256] ▪ China ▪ Worldwide ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service September 14, [shipments from the services suspension of pick- 2021 till following zip codes in up service further notice Xiamen City in Fujian Province only - 361100 - 361113 - 361199] ▪ China ▪ Europe ▪ FedEx International Temporary service October 20, Economy (IE) suspension 2020 till ▪ FedEx International further notice Economy Freight (IEF) ▪ FedEx International Economy DirectDistribution (IED) ▪ Worldwide ▪ All FedEx and TNT Minimum weight of June 8, 2020 services 50kg per air waybill till further [For Personal for formal entry notice Protective Equipment shipments (PPE) formal entry Note: Personal PPE shipments only] shipments will not be subject to this minimum weight limit of 50kg but must comply to China Customs requirement for personal shipment clearance. ▪ Hong Kong SAR ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service Till further China services suspension notice [Mask shipments only] ▪ China ▪ Macau SAR China ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service Till further services suspension notice [Mask shipments only] Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 3 Information is subject to change without prior notice Effective Origin Destination Affected service Service Impact period ▪ Hong Kong SAR ▪ Europe ▪ FedEx International Temporary service November 20, China Economy (IE) suspension 2020 till ▪ FedEx International further notice Economy Freight (IEF) ▪ FedEx International Economy DirectDistribution (IED) ▪ Kiribati ▪ Worldwide ▪ All TNT services Temporary service March 31, suspension 2020 till further notice ▪ Tuvalu ▪ Worldwide ▪ All TNT services Temporary service March 31, suspension 2020 till further notice Inbound to APAC ▪ Worldwide ▪ American Samoa ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service July 28, 2021 till services suspension further notice ▪ China ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service September 11, [shipments to the services suspension of 2021 till following Out of delivery service further notice Delivery Area (ODA) zip codes in Xianyou District, Putian City in Fujian Province only - 351200 - 351253 - 351254 - 351256] ▪ China ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service September 14, [shipments to the services suspension of 2021 till following zip delivery service further notice codes in Xiamen City in Fujian Province only - 361100 - 361113 - 361199] Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 4 Information is subject to change without prior notice Effective Origin Destination Affected service Service Impact period ▪ Europe ▪ French Polynesia ▪ All FedEx Economy Temporary service April 1, 2020 services suspension till further ▪ TNT Economy Express notice ▪ Worldwide ▪ East Timor ▪ All FedEx and TNT Temporary service July 12, 2021 services suspension till further notice ▪ Kiribati ▪ All TNT services Temporary service March 31, suspension 2020 till further notice ▪ Mongolia ▪ FedEx International Temporary service May 18, 2020 Economy (IE) suspension till further ▪ TNT Economy Express notice ▪ Norfolk Island ▪ FedEx International Temporary service March 30, Priority (IP) suspension 2020 till further notice ▪ Tuvalu ▪ All TNT services Temporary service March 31, suspension 2020 till further notice Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 5 Information is subject to change without prior notice Transit Time Extension Note: The service adjustments under ‘Temporary service suspension and restrictions’ above will supersede the transit time extensions under this section in situations of any overlaps. Additional transit Origin Destination Affected service Effective period time (working days) Outbound from APAC ▪ APAC, except for: ▪ Europe ▪ All FedEx services, 1 May 7, 2021 – - China except for: September 30, - Hong Kong SAR - FedEx 2021 China International - Japan Priority Freight - South Korea (IPF) - Malaysia ▪ FedEx International 2 - Singapore Priority Freight - Taiwan China (IPF) ▪ APAC, ▪ Papua New Guinea ▪ TNT Express 1 For every Monday except for: pickup* starting - Australia March 13, 2020 till - New Zealand further notice ▪ APAC ▪ Angola ▪ All FedEx and TNT Up to 7 April 15, 2020 till ▪ Botswana services further notice ▪ Eswatini ▪ Kenya ▪ Lesotho ▪ Malawi ▪ Mozambique ▪ Namibia ▪ South Africa ▪ Zambia Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 6 Information is subject to change without prior notice Additional transit Origin Destination Affected service Effective period time (working days) ▪ APAC, except for: ▪ New Zealand ▪ All FedEx services 1 Till further notice - Brunei - Cambodia - China - Cook Islands - French Polynesia - Guam - Hong Kong SAR China - Indonesia - Japan - Macau SAR China - Malaysia - New Caledonia - Philippines - Samoa - Singapore - South Korea - Taiwan China - Thailand - Vanuatu - Vietnam ▪ APAC ▪ New Zealand ▪ All TNT services 1 Till further notice Service updates due to COVID-19 outbreak | Posted on September 22, 2021 7 Information is subject to change without prior notice Additional transit Origin Destination Affected service Effective period time (working days) ▪ Australia ▪ Worldwide ▪ All FedEx and TNT Potential service August 24, 2021 till services delay further notice ▪ Hong Kong SAR ▪ TNT Express Up to 3 June 16, 2020 till China further notice ▪ U.S. ▪ All FedEx
Recommended publications
  • Holiday Last Day to Ship
    2021 Shipping deadlines for holiday packages Last days to ship U.S. to U.S. Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri FedEx Express® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Same Day® FO, PO, SO, Extra Hours 2Day & 2Day AM FedEx Express Saver® FedEx 1Day® Freight 12/19 FedEx 2Day® Freight FedEx 3Day® Freight FedEx Ground® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Ground® Contiguous US FedEx Ground® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Home Delivery® Contiguous US FedEx Home Delivery® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Ground® Economy FedEx Freight® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Freight® Priority FedEx Freight® Economy FedEx Freight® Direct International Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri U.S. to Canada 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx® International Next Flight FedEx International First® FedEx International Priority® FedEx International Priority Distribution® FedEx International Economy® U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Resource Curse Affects Urban Development in East Timor
    The Sustainable City V 495 How the resource curse affects urban development in East Timor I. M. Madaleno Portuguese Tropical Research Institute, Lisbon Abstract East Timor is heavily reliant upon royalty and taxation revenues from petroleum and natural gas resources. Poor management of natural resources revenue has given ground for the nation to fall victim to the ‘resource curse’. This paper provides an overview of the country’s recent history whilst characterising its energy resources availability and case-studying a stressing and omnipresent urban problem: the persistence of internal displaced people (idps) living in refugee camps within Dili district. The objective of this contribution is to describe sample research conducted in the capital city of the first 21st century nation on Earth, so as to evaluate with empirical data how the wealth of natural resources is being used both to improve East Timorese daily lives and to regenerate the urban tissue. Keywords: resource curse, refugee camps, urban regeneration, Dili, East Timor. 1 Introduction Asian tigers – South Korea, Taiwan, Hong-Kong and Singapore – are resource- poor countries. East Timor as well as Angola, both former Portuguese colonies, are resource-rich, exhibiting poor economic growth performances and displaying high levels of poverty (see table 1). The quality of local institutions is decisive, though, for there is no curse that cannot be lifted [1, 2]. It is widely accepted that good governance and a strong juridical and institutional framework tend to minimise the ill consequences of the mineral and energy resources privilege both on common people and on political leaders. Weak administration of revenues by contrast can lead to financial resources waste and environmental constrains on grounds of political mismanagement and corruption as on easy money availability excesses.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
    Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CARLOS TAVERAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 3:15-cv-01550-JAM v. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Defendant. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EXPEDITED TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC. Third-Party Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S ASSENTED-TO MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated delivery drivers who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to standard contracts under which they were classified as independent contractors. Plaintiff alleges that XPO’s delivery contractors were actually employees, and based on this misclassification, XPO’s practice of making deductions from its delivery drivers’ pay for such things as damage claims and worker’s compensation violates the Connecticut wage payments laws. Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-71e. The parties have reached a non-reversionary class action settlement for $950,000. 1 Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 45 On March 17, 2017, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, certified a class of individuals who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to contracts that class them as independent contractors, and authorized notice to the class. ECF No. 115. Plaintiff now seeks the Court’s final approval of the proposed class action settlement at the final settlement approval hearing scheduled for July 7, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Fedex Express Hybrid-Electric Delivery Trucks
    VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Project Results: Evaluating FedEx Express Hybrid-Electric Delivery Trucks The National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) Fleet Test and Evaluation Team evaluated the 12-month, in-service performance of three Class 4 gasoline hybrid-electric delivery trucks and three comparable conventional diesel trucks operated by FedEx Express in Southern California. In addition, the tailpipe emissions and fuel economy of one of the gasoline hybrid-electric vehicles (gHEVs) and one diesel truck were tested on a chassis dynamometer. The gHEVs were equipped with a parallel hybrid system manufactured by Azure FedEx Express’s gasoline hybrid-electric delivery trucks Dynamics, including a 100-kW alternating current induction demonstrated lower tailpipe emissions compared with conventional motor, regenerative braking, and a 2.45-kWh nickel-metal- diesel delivery trucks. Courtesy of Sam Snyder, FedEx Express hydride battery pack. This fact sheet summarizes the results of the evaluation of the gHEVs. This technology evaluation was part of a collaborative effort In-Service Testing co-funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Three routes served by gHEVs and three served by Vehicle Technologies Program and the South Coast Air conventional diesel trucks were selected for the evaluation, Quality Management District (SCAQMD) via CALSTART. which took place from April 2009 to April 2010. The gHEVs The in-use technology evaluation was conducted by NREL were moved to the initial diesel routes after 6 months of and primarily sponsored by DOE. The chassis dynamometer evaluation, while the diesel trucks were moved to the initial testing was conducted by NREL and primarily funded by gHEV routes.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong: Key Issues in 2021
    December 23, 2020 Hong Kong: Key Issues in 2021 The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR, country or with external elements to endanger national or Hong Kong) is a city located off the southern coast of security.” The NPCSC and the HKSAR government have Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China (PRC or stated that the NSL was necessary to restore order China). More than 90% of Hong Kong’s population is following the large-scale protests of 2019. For more about ethnically Chinese. The first language of the vast majority the 2019 protests, see CRS In Focus IF11295, Hong Kong’s is Cantonese, a variety of Chinese different from what is Protests of 2019. spoken in most of the PRC. Hong Kong at a Glance Under the provisions of a 1984 international treaty known Population (2020): 7.5 million as the “Joint Declaration,” sovereignty over Hong Kong Area: 1,082 square kilometers (418 square miles) transferred from the United Kingdom to the PRC on July 1, Per Capita GDP (2019): HK$381,714 (US$48,938) 1997. In the Joint Declaration, China pledged the former British colony “will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, Life Expectancy (at birth, 2018): Men: 82.2 years; except in foreign and defence affairs,” and “will be vested Women: 88.1 years with executive, legislative and independent judicial power, Leadership: Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor including that of final adjudication.” China also promised Source: Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department that the “[r]ights and freedoms, including those of the person, of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, The Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) has arrested dozens of travel, of movement, of correspondence, of strike, of of people for alleged NSL violations.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Carrier Code List
    Massachusetts Carrier Code List UPS Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) U01 UPS Next Day 3rd party address also required* U04 UPS 2nd Day CL1 UPS Next Day Collect U10 UPS 3 Day Residential CL2 UPS 2nd Day Collect U11 UPS 3 Day Commercial CL3 UPS 3 Day Collect U25 UPS Ground Commercial CLT UPS Ground Collect U26 UPS Ground Residential UTP UPS Ground Third Party* U60 UPS Early A.M. UT1 UPS Next Day Third Party * UT2 UPS 2nd Day Third Party* UPS International Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) U08 UPS Standard Canada 3rd party address also required* U09 UPS Worldwide Express U48 UPS Standard Collect/3rd Party (Canada)* U49 UPS Worldwide Express Collect/Third Party* FedEx Domestic Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party R02 FedEx Ground Commercial R05 FedEx Ground Third Party (account # required) R03 FedEx Ground Residential R07 FedEx Ground Collect F01 FedEx Priority Overnight RRP FedEx Ground Bill Recipient (account # required) F02 FedEx Standard Overnight F10 FedEx Priority Overnight Collect F03 FedEx 2 Day F12 FedEx Priority Overnight Third Party F04 FedEx Express Saver F20 FedEx Standard Overnight Collect F05 FedEx Express Saver Residential F22 FedEx Standard Overnight Third Party F13 FedEx 2 Day Residential F30 FedEx 2 Day Collect F50 FedEx 1st Overnight F33 FedEx 2 Day Third Party International Standard Billing Billing Collect/3rd party (account # required) R04 FedEx Ground Canada F7C FedEx International Priority Collect R09 FedEx Ground Collect Canada F7T FedEx International Priority Third
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick W. Smith Fedex Chairman and CEO Frederick W. Smith Is
    Frederick W. Smith FedEx Chairman and CEO Frederick W. Smith is chairman and chief executive officer of FedEx Corp., a $75 billion global transportation, business services, technology, and logistics company serving more than 220 countries and territories. Smith is responsible for providing strategic direction for all of FedEx Corp. and its operating companies, including FedEx Express, FedEx Ground, FedEx Freight, FedEx Logistics, FedEx Office, and FedEx Services. Since founding FedEx in 1971, he has been an active proponent of regulatory reform, free trade, and “open skies agreements” for aviation around the world. Smith is co-chairman of the Energy Security Leadership Council, a trustee for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and a member of the Business Roundtable and The Business Council. He served as chairman of the US-China Business Council and is co-chairman of the French-American Business Council. He has also served on the boards of several large public companies and on the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and Mayo Foundation boards. He was formerly chairman of the Board of Governors for the International Air Transport Association and the U.S. Air Transport Association. Smith has received numerous civic, academic, and business awards, including the Global Leadership Award from the U.S.-India Business Council, the George C. Marshall Foundation Award, the Atlantic Council’s Distinguished Business Leadership Award, and the Circle of Honor Award from the Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation. In addition, he is a member of the Aviation Hall of Fame, served as co-chairman of both the U.S. World War II Memorial Project and the campaign for the National Museum of the Marine Corps, was cited in Forbes “100 Greatest Living Business Minds,” and was named a top CEO by Barron’s and Chief Executive magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong (China)
    126 Hong Kong (China) A. Progress in the implementation of the minimum standard Hong Kong (China) has 41 tax agreements in force, as reported in its response to the Peer Review questionnaire. Three of those agreements, the agreements with Belarus*, Estonia and Finland, comply with the minimum standard. Hong Kong (China) joined the MLI in 2017 and has not listed its agreements with India and Saudi Arabia. It indicated in its response to the Peer Review questionnaire that it would list those agreements under the MLI. India and Saudi Arabia have listed their agreements with Hong Kong (China) under the MLI. Hong Kong (China) is implementing the minimum standard through the inclusion of the preamble statement and the PPT.61 The agreements that will be modified by the MLI will come into compliance with the minimum standard once the provisions of the MLI take effect. B. Implementation issues Hong Kong (China)’s listed agreements under the MLI will start to be compliant after the ratification of the MLI. It is encouraged that the MLI be ratified as soon as possible. Summary of the jurisdiction response – Hong Kong (China) Treaty partners Compliance If compliant, Signature of The alternative Comments with the the alternative a complying implemented through the standard implemented instrument complying instrument (if not the MLI) 1 Austria No N/A Yes N/A 2 Belarus* Yes PPT alone N/A N/A 3 Belgium No N/A Yes N/A 4 Brunei Darussalam No N/A Yes N/A 5 Cambodia* No N/A No N/A To be added to the list of agreements that Hong Kong wishes to cover under the MLI or through bilateral negotiations of an amending protocol 6 Canada No N/A Yes N/A 7 Czech Republic No N/A Yes N/A 8 Estonia Yes PPT alone N/A N/A 9 Finland Yes PPT alone N/A N/A 61 For 35 of its agreements listed under the MLI, Hong Kong is implementing the preamble statement (Article 6 of the MLI).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Integration Between Hong Kong, Taiwan and The
    OECD Economic Studies No . 20. Spring 1993 ECONOMIC INTEGRATION BETWEEN HONG KONG. TAIWAN AND THE COASTAL PROVINCES OF CHINA Randall S. Jones. Robert E . King and Michael Klein CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................... 116 1. Economic integration within the CEA ............................. 118 A . Trade .................................................. 118 B. Foreign direct investment ................................... 123 C . Other linkages ........................................... 127 D. Impact of integration within the CEA .......................... 128 II . Forces driving integration ...................................... 130 A . Resource endowments ...................................... 130 B . Revealed comparative advantage ............................ 133 C . The role of policies ........................................ 134 D . Political ties ............................................. 137 E . Rapid growth despite policy distortions ......................... 138 Ill. Outlook .................................................... 139 Bibliography .................................................... 1.43 Randall S . Jones and Robert E. King are economists in the Foreign Trade and Investment Division of the Economics Department. Michael Klein. who was formerly employed in the same division. now works at the World Bank . The authors would like to thank Sveinbjorn Blondal. Michael P . Feiner. Nicholas Vanston and Bernard Wacquez for their comments and suggestions. 115 INTRODUCTION During the past
    [Show full text]
  • 10. HONG KONG's STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE UNDER CHINESE SOVEREIGNTY Tai Ming Cheung Hong Kong Has Come a Long Way Since It Was
    - 170 - 10. HONG KONG’S STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE UNDER CHINESE SOVEREIGNTY Tai Ming Cheung Hong Kong has come a long way since it was dismissed as a barren rock a century and a half ago. This bastion of freewheeling capitalism today is a leading international financial, trading and communications center serving one of the world’s fastest growing economic regions. But Hong Kong is also entering a period of considerable change and uncertainty following its reversion to Chinese sovereignty that is likely to have a far- reaching impact on its strategic importance and role over the coming years. As a British colony, Hong Kong was an important outpost for the West to keep an eye on China and safeguard busy sea-lanes. Under Chinese rule, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) will play a crucial role in boosting China’s economic growth and promoting Beijing’s long-term goal of reunification with Taiwan. How China handles Hong Kong’s return will have major consequences for the territory as well as for China’s relations with the international community. The world will be watching very carefully whether Beijing will adhere to its international commitments of allowing the SAR to retain a high degree of autonomy. The U.S. has said that the transition will be a key issue in determining its future relations with China. This paper will examine the strategic implications of Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule. Several key issues will be explored: • Hong Kong's past and present strategic significance. • The stationing of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • United Parcel Service-Federal Express-National Labor Relations
    United Parcel Service-Federal Express-National Labor Relations Act-Railway Labor Act-Union Employee-Independent Contractor- FedEx-Current Developments of the Legal Status of FedEx Workers- and the Trend of Employers Classifying Employees as Independent Contractors Richard Trotter University of Baltimore UPS and FedEx are both package delivery services, however UPS workers are considered employees under the National Labor Relations Act and are represented by the Teamsters Union. FedEx, which began as an air delivery service is under the jurisdiction of the Railway Labor Act. In recent years, FedEx management has restructured its relationships with its workers in such a way as to classify them as independent contractors. Legislative actions on both the state and federal level have sought to impose stricter scrutiny on employers classifying their employees as independent contractors. INTRODUCTION The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) was originally enacted in 1935. Since its original enactment the law has been amended twice, in 1947 with the enactment of the Taft-Hartley Act and again in 1959 with the enactment of the Landrum-Griffin Act. The basic philosophic underpinnings of the law is that it protects a worker’s right to organize into labor Unions, and once organized workers can seek to be represented by a union through the election process administered by the NLRB. Once a union is chosen, the employer has a duty to engage in collective bargaining with the union elected by the employees. In 1926 the Railway Labor Act was enacted originally to govern labor relations in the railway industry. The purpose behind the law was to ensure the smooth running of the railroads without labor disruptions particularly in times of war or other national crisis.
    [Show full text]