Environment Specific Contract No. 2016 / 377924 COUNTRY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment Specific Contract No. 2016 / 377924 COUNTRY Delegation of the European to Afghanistan Framework Contract Beneficiaries 2013 Lot 6 – Environment Specific Contract No. 2016 / 377924 COUNTRY ENVIRONMENT PROFILE FOR AFGHANISTAN Date: June 2017 Report: Final Report CONSORTIUM SAFEGE FWC-Lot6 National Environmental Protection Agency A project implemented by Consortium SAFEGE This project is funded by the European Union This report is financed by the European Union and is presented by the Consortium SAFEGE for the Government of Afghanistan and the European Commission. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Government or the European Commission. REPORT CONTROL PATH Project title: COUNTRY ENVIRONMENT PROFILE FOR AFGHANISTAN Specific Contract No: 2016 / 377924 Country: Afghanistan Framework Contractor: Consortium SAFEGE Address: Gulledelle 92 – B-1200 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32-2-739.46.90 Fax: +32-2-742.38.91 E-mail: [email protected] Specific Contract Implementing Party: Acciona Ingeniería Address: Albatros Business Centre – Building D. Anabel Segura, 11 - 28108 Alcobendas - Madrid (SPAIN) Tel: +34 911 420 300 Fax: +34 911 420 390 E-mail: [email protected] Date of the Report: June 2017 Reporting Period: Final Report Authors of Report: . Ali M. Azimi . Ahmad Mumtaz . Gul Afghan Saleh Specific Contract Implementing Party –Responsible Person: Acciona Ingeniería . Álvaro Adam June 2017 Framework Contractor: SAFEGE Consortium Lot 6 Date: June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 1 AUTHORS.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................... 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 8 2. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 HYDROGEOLOGY & GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1.2 SOILS & TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 PRECIPITATION ...................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.4 TEMPERATURE ...................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.5 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.6 AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.7 NATURAL DISASTER RISKS ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 BIODIVERSITY/PROTECTED AREAS3 ............................................................................................................ 24 2.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................ 28 2.3.1 SOCIO-CULTURAL ASPECTS ................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.2 ARCHAEOLOGY & CULTURAL HERITAGE................................................................................................ 28 2.3.3 LAND USE............................................................................................................................................... 29 2.3.4 TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................................. 29 2.3.5 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................ 30 2.3.6 MINERAL INDUSTRY .............................................................................................................................. 31 2.3.7 ECONOMY.............................................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.8 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.9 HEALTH .................................................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.10 ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY......................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.11 INDICATORS ........................................................................................................................................... 34 2.4 CLIMATE CHANGE ...................................................................................................................................... 35 2.4.1 RANGELAND .......................................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.2 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................ 37 2.4.3 SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.4 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.5 ENERGY .................................................................................................................................................. 37 3. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .............................................. 38 3.1 POLICY & ACTION PLANS ............................................................................................................................ 38 3.1.1 LAW ON THE PRESERVATION OF AFGHANISTAN’S HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE (2004) ..... 38 3.1.2 ENVIRONMENT LAW (2007) .................................................................................................................. 38 3.1.3 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT POLICY ................................................................ 39 3.1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS (2008) ........................................................... 39 3.1.5 THE WATER LAW (2009) ........................................................................................................................ 39 3.1.6 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ACTION PLAN (2009) .................................................................................. 40 Specific Contract No. 2016 / 377924 Country Environment Profile for Afghanistan P.1 3.2 LEGISLATION CURRENT AND IN PREPARATION .......................................................................................... 40 3.2.1 AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.2 WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.3 RANGELAND, FORESTS AND MEDICINAL PLANTS LAW ......................................................................... 40 3.2.4 BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................................ 40 3.3 GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO KEY INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONVENTIONS .......................... 41 3.3.1 NATIONAL CAPACITY NEEDS SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (NCSA) AND NATIONAL ADAPTATION PROGRAM OF ACTION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE (NAPA), 2009 .. 41 3.3.2 DRAFT AFGHANISTAN CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN, 2014 ................................... 41 3.3.3 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONVENTIONS ............................................................................. 42 3.3.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................................................................................... 42 3.3.5 ENFORCEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 43 3.4.1 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................ 43 3.4.2 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SHARING NATURAL RESOURCES SUCH AS WATER .................. 44 3.4.3 REGIONAL COOPERATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ..................................................................... 44 3.4.4 CAPACITY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Recommended publications
  • Iran and Central Asia: a Cultural Perspective1
    Iran and Central Asia: A Cultural Perspective1 Davood Kiani One of the most important tools utilized by states to maximize their impact in foreign affairs is public diplomacy and to this extent, public diplomacy is considered a source of soft power. The robust use of public diplomacy can enhance and reinforce the soft power of countries. Central Asia is among the regions that have an ever increasing relevance to regional and international affairs in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union, and is currently considered a critical subsystem for our country. The foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards this region is, on one hand, built on the foundation of converging factors in political, economic, and cultural arenas and looking towards opportunities for influence and cooperation. On the other hand, considering the divergent components, it also faces challenges and threats, the sum of which continues to effect the orientation of Iranian foreign policy towards the region. This article will study Iranian public diplomacy in this region and examine the opportunities and challenges, as well as, provide and proper model for a successful public diplomacy in the region of Central Asia, while taking into account the Islamic Republic of Iran’s tools and potential. Keywords: Public diplomacy, foreign affairs, Central Asia, Islamic Republic of Iran 1 This article is based on “Cultural Policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Central Asia” a research funded by Islamic Azad University, Qum Branch Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University of Qom ([email protected]) (Received: 20 January 2014 Accepted: 5 June 2014) Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction
    CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE, STOCKPILING, PRODUCTION AND TRANSFER OF ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION Reporting Formats for Article 7 STATE [PARTY]: Afghanistan Mohammad Shafiq Yosufi, Director Directorate of Mine Action Coordination POINT OF CONTACT: (DMAC1), Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority (ANDMA). Email: [email protected] Tel: +93 (0) 705 966 401 (Name, organization, telephone, fax, email) (ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION) 1 The government department working for mine action previously known as Department of Mine Clearance (DMC) was officially changed to DMAC in 2015. COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL ARTICLE 7 REPORT NAME OF STATE [PARTY]: Afghanistan REPORTING PERIOD: 1St January 2018 to 31st December 2018 (dd/mm/yyyy) (dd/mm/yyyy) Form A: National implementation measures: Form E: Status of conversion programs: Form I: Warning measures: ✓ changed changed ✓ changed unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) ✓ unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) un changed (last reporting: yyyy) non-applicable non-applicable Form B: Stockpiled anti-personnel mines: Form F: Program of APM destruction: Form J: Other Relevant Matters ✓ changed ✓ changed ✓ changed unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) un changed (last reporting: yyyy) non-applicable non-applicable non -applicable Form C: Location of mined areas: Form G: APM destroyed: ✓ changed ✓ changed unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) unchanged (last reporting: yyyy) non-applicable non-applicable Form D: APMs retained or transferred: Form
    [Show full text]
  • EASO Country of Origin Information Report Afghanistan
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Afghanistan Key socio-economic indicators, state protection, and mobility in Kabul City, Mazar-e Sharif, and Herat City August 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO EASO Country of Origin Information Report Afghanistan Key socio-economic indicators, state protection, and mobility in Kabul City, Mazar-e Sharif, and Herat City August 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-610-2 doi:10.2847/106463 BZ-02-17-757-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-611-9 doi:10.2847/270432 BZ-02-17-757-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office, 2017 Cover photo: © ILO (Flickr) Day Labourers in Afghanistan. A group of young Afghan men are looking for work in Kabul. Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO Country of Origin Information Report: Afghanistan – Key socio-economic indicators, state protection, and mobility in Kabul City, Mazar-e Sharif, and Herat City — 3 Acknowledgments EASO would like to acknowledge the Polish Office for Foreigners, Department for Refugees Procedures (Country of Origin Information Unit) as the co-author of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkmen Language: Alphabet, Structure and Writing
    International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation ISSN: 2582-7138 Received: 03-07-2021; Accepted: 19-07-2021 www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com Volume 2; Issue 4; July-August 2021; Page No. 663-664 Turkmen Language: Alphabet, structure and writing Homayoun Mahmoodi Lecture, Department of Turkmani, Education Faculty, Jawzjan University, Sheberghan, Afghanistan Corresponding Author: Homayoun Mahmoodi Abstract The Turkmen Language is classified as one of the Turkic people worldwide, with approximately 1 million more languages which are all in the Ural-Altaic language family. speaking it as a second language. The majority of Turkmen Like all Turkic languages, the Turkmen Language is an speakers are located in Eurasia and Central Asia, with the agglutinative language that has productive inflectional and highest concentrations located in Turkmenistan, Iran, and derivational suffixes which are affixed to a word like “beads Afghanistan. on a string”. Turkmen is spoken natively by about 7 million Keywords: Turkmen, Afghanistan, Alphabet, structure 1. Introduction Turkmen are part of the ethno-linguistic Turkic continuum that stretches from western China to western Turkey. They share a claim to western-Turkic (Oguz) heritage along with Azerbaijanis and Turks in Turkey (Golden 1972) [4]. Despite a distinct twenty-first century identity, Turkmen culture and traditions historically overlapped with that of other Turks. The term “Turkic” refers to this cultural and linguistic heritage that all Turkic-language speaking groups share. Nevertheless, a separate Turkmen sense of identity was born out of their particular historical experience. A nomadic heritage, distinctively Oguz dialects, and tribal traditions contribute greatly to the identity that sets Turkmen apart from other Turkic groups and shape a specifically Turkmen sense of ethnic identity.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLDMINE? a Critical Look at the Commercialization of Afghan Demining
    Bolton, Matthew GOLDMINE? A Critical Look at the Commercialization of Afghan Demining Centre for the Study of Global Governance (LSE) Research Paper 01/2008 Centre for the Study of Global Governance London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global 1 GOLDMINE ? A Critical Look at the Commercialization of Afghan Demining Matthew Bolton Centre for the Study of Global Governance London School of Economics and Political Science This research is funded in part by the Economic and Social Research Council All text, graphics and photos © Matthew Bolton, 2008. 2 Contents Acronyms........................................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary........................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction................................................................................................................. 8 2. A Brief History of Afghan Demining ....................................................................... 10 2.1 The Three Roots of Afghan Demining, 1987-1994............................................ 10 2.2. UN Hegemony, 1994-2001................................................................................ 19 2.3. The 9/11 Sea Change ......................................................................................... 23 2.4. Summary...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Laws and Ethnic Accommodation: Why Cross-Ethnic Coalitions Have Failed to Institutionalize in Afghanistan
    Political Laws and Ethnic Accommodation: Why Cross-Ethnic Coalitions Have Failed to Institutionalize in Afghanistan Mohammad Bashir Mobasher A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Robert Pekannen, Chair Jonathan Eddy, Co-Chair James Long Scott Radnitz Leigh Anderson Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Law © Copyright 2017 Mohammad Bashir Mobasher University of Washington ABSTRACT Political Laws and Ethnic Accommodation: Why Cross-Ethnic Coalitions Have Failed to Institutionalize in Afghanistan Mohammad Bashir Mobasher Chairs of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Robert Pekannen – Jackson School of International Studies Professor Jonathan Eddy – School of Law Afghanistan suffers from an ethnic-based and fragmented party system. Although some cross-ethnic coalitions have emerged, especially during the presidential elections, these coalitions have failed to survive across elections and branches of government. As for what explains the failure of the consolidation of coalitions, some scholars pointed to the SNTV system and others to the presidential system. This study examines all related institutional designs, including the SNTV system for parliamentary elections, the runoff system for presidential elections, the presidential system, dual vice presidency, and party qualification thresholds. These systems and institutions are designed by three bodies of political laws: the Constitution, electoral laws, and party laws. Analyzing these laws and institutional designs, this study makes three observations. First, the failure of coalitions to institutionalize in Afghanistan is not due to a single political law or institutional design but due to the influence of a number of them. Second, for cross-ethnic coalitions to institutionalize, all related institutional designs must act cohesively or else they fail to incentivize coalition-building, as is the case in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S
    Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy Christopher M. Blanchard Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs June 18, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32686 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy Summary Opium poppy cultivation and drug trafficking have eroded Afghanistan’s fragile political and economic order over the last 30 years. In spite of ongoing counternarcotics efforts by the Afghan government, the United States, and their partners, Afghanistan remains the source of over 90% of the world’s illicit opium. Since 2001, efforts to provide viable economic alternatives to poppy cultivation and to disrupt drug trafficking and related corruption have succeeded in some areas. However, insecurity, particularly in the southern province of Helmand, and widespread corruption fueled a surge in cultivation in 2006 and 2007, pushing opium output to all-time highs. In 2008, poppy cultivation decreased in north-central and eastern Afghanistan, while drug activity became more concentrated in the south and west. National poppy cultivation and opium production totals dropped slightly in 2008, as pressure from provincial officials, higher wheat prices, drought, and lower opium prices altered the cultivation decisions of some Afghan poppy farmers. Some experts have questioned the sustainability of rapid changes in cultivation patterns and recommend reinforcing recent reductions to replace poppy cultivation over time. Across Afghanistan, insurgents, criminal organizations, and corrupt officials exploit narcotics as a reliable source of revenue and patronage, which has perpetuated the threat these groups pose to the country’s fragile internal security and the legitimacy of its democratic government.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Peace Diplomacy Journal International Peace Studies Centre (IPSC) ISSN 2043-9016 (Print) ISSN 2043-9024 (Online)
    Number 6, Spring 2012 Just Peace Diplomacy Journal International Peace Studies Centre (IPSC) www.peace-ipsc.org ISSN 2043-9016 (Print) ISSN 2043-9024 (Online) English Articles 1-78 Persian Articles 79-254 Editor in Chief Just Peace Diplomacy Journal is a peer Dr Seyed G Safavi, IPSC, UK reviewed journal published by the International Peace Studies Centre (IPSC). Editorial Board The journal aims to create constructive dialogue and offer in-depth analysis on the Dr Talal Atrissi, Lebanese University, political and security situation in the Middle Lebanon East and Central Asia, with the objective of furthering ‘just peace’ in the region. The Prof Judith Blau, University of North journal contains articles in English and Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Persian. Contributions to Just Peace Diplomacy Journal do not necessarily reflect Prof Peter Fosl, Transylvania University, the views of the editorial board or the USA International Peace Studies Centre. Just Peace Diplomacy Journal’s primary areas Dr Shireen Hunter, CSIS, USA of interest are peace, security and stability, militarism, energy and international presence Prof Israr Ahmad Khan, International in the Middle East and Central Asia. Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Malaysia Contributors are invited to submit papers to the Journal by emailing a digital version of Dr Oleg V. Kuznetsov, Chita State their paper to the Executive Manager University, Russia ([email protected]). Prof S. Kazem Sajjadpour, School of International Relations, Iran The Mailing Address of the journal: 121 Royal Langford, 2 Greville Rd, Prof Yoginder Singh Sikand, National London, NW6 5HT, Law School, Bangalore, India. UK Prof Peter Slinn, SOAS, UK Email: [email protected] Executive Manager and Assistant Subscription: Editor of English section Individual subscription is £20 per issue Seyed Sadreddin Safavi Organisational Subscription is £60 per issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar 10 FW.Indd
    Iraqis inspired him to want to do more. “I really enjoyed putting a smile on the faces of the chil- dren,” he said. “It made me homesick for my own family, but in a good way -- reminding me of the important things in life.” Upon his return, he contacted Mary Margaret Halleck, the founder of the Victory Boxes program, and began work- ing closely with her to get more people from the command and the local area involved. “This effort is such a worthwhile thing,” said Gross. “You DOD can’t believe the look on people’s faces when they get some- thing that is going to make their life a little bit better. This is the other side of the battle, winning the hearts and minds America Supports You: of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.” Command makes difference The in-theater volunteers are not all front-line service- members. They’re chaplains, medical personnel, civil affairs and supply folks. People at all levels and in all services are with Victory Boxes getting involved. By Ed White The Victory Boxes program started because Halleck’s Special to American Forces Press Service stepson was deployed to the war zone and, in his communi- cations to her, he described the true poverty he saw. She put WASHINGTON – An Air Force Space Command major and together some care packages for him to distribute and sent two staff sergeants stationed at Peterson Air Force Base, them off. Her stepson came home, but she realized the need Colo., are proving that just three servicemembers can affect was still there, and it inspired her to start Victory Boxes in people halfway around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Assistance in a (Pre)-Conflict Afghanistan
    Humanitarian assistance in a (pre)-conflict Afghanistan A contextual analysis - 2013 Final report May 2013 Humanitarian Assistance In A (Pre-)Conflict Afghanistan 1 Samuel Hall. is a non-politicized research and consulting company with headquarters in Kabul, Afghanistan. We specialise in socio-economic surveys, private and public sector studies, monitoring and evaluation and impact assessments for governmental, non-governmental and international organisations. Our teams of field practitioners, academic experts and local interviewers have years of experience leading research in Afghanistan. We use our expertise to balance needs of beneficiaries with the requirements of development actors. This has enabled us to acquire a firm grasp of the political and socio- cultural context in the country; design data collection methods and statistical analyses for monitoring, evaluating, and planning sustainable programmes and to apply cross- disciplinary knowledge in providing integrated solutions for efficient and effective interventions. Visit us at http://www.samuelhall.org This report should be cited using the following reference: Samuel Hall Consulting. “Humanitarian assistance in a pre-conflict Afghanistan? A contextual analysis 2013” This publication was prepared with the support of the United Nations World Food Programme (UNWFP) and implemented by Samuel Hall. The views and analysis contained in the publication therefore do not necessarily represent UNWFP’s views. Samuel Hall encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to [email protected]. Humanitarian Assistance In A (Pre-)Conflict Afghanistan 2 Table of Contents Assessing the Afghan context in 2013 ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Sikhs Persecuted) Afghanistan CG [2015] UKUT 00595 (IAC
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) TG and others (Afghan Sikhs persecuted) Afghanistan CG [2015] UKUT 00595 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated on 31st March 2014 and 17th August 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PLIMMER Between TG (1) GD (2) GJ (3) PM (4) (ANONYMITY ORDER MADE) Appellants and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent Representation: For the Appellant: Mr Bazini (Counsel) on behalf of the first, second and third Appellants on 31st March 2014. No attendance on 17th August 2015. Miss Bayati (Counsel) on behalf of the fourth Appellant on 31st March 2014 and Mr Warnapala, Solicitor, on 17th August 2015. For the Respondent: Mr Tarlow (Senior Home Office Presenting Officer). © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2015 Risk to followers of the Sikh and Hindu faiths in Afghanistan: (i) Some members of the Sikh and Hindu communities in Afghanistan continue to suffer harassment at the hands of Muslim zealots. (ii) Members of the Sikh and Hindu communities in Afghanistan do not face a real risk of persecution or ill-treatment such as to entitle them to a grant of international protection on the basis of their ethnic or religious identity, per se. Neither can it be said that the cumulative impact of discrimination suffered by the Sikh and Hindu communities in general reaches the threshold of persecution. (iii) A consideration of whether an individual member of the Sikh and Hindu communities is at risk real of persecution upon return to Afghanistan is fact-sensitive. All the relevant circumstances must be considered but careful attention should be paid to the following: a.
    [Show full text]