Department of Energy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 78 Thursday, No. 75 April 18, 2013 Part II Department of Energy 10 CFR Part 431 Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:23 Apr 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\18APR2.SGM 18APR2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES 23336 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 75 / Thursday, April 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: b. Pole-Mounted Liquid-Immersed James Raba, U.S. Department of Energy, Distribution Transformers 10 CFR Part 431 Office of Energy Efficiency and c. Network and Vault Liquid-Immersed Renewable Energy, Building Distribution Transformers [Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–STD–0048] d. BIL Ratings in Liquid-Immersed Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000 Distribution Transformers RIN 1904–AC04 Independence Avenue SW., e. Data Center Transformers Washington, DC, 20585–0121. Energy Conservation Program: Energy f. Noise and Vibration Telephone: (202) 586–8654. Email: g. Multivoltage Capability Conservation Standards for Distribution_Transformers@ h. Consumer Utility Distribution Transformers ee.doe.gov. 3. Technology Options a. Core Deactivation AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Ami Grace-Tardy, U.S. Department of b. Symmetric Core Renewable Energy, Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue c. Intellectual Property Energy. d. Core Construction Technique SW., Washington, DC, 20585–0121. ACTION: Final rule. B. Screening Analysis Telephone: (202) 586–5709. Email: 1. Nanotechnology Composites SUMMARY: The Energy Policy and [email protected]. C. Engineering Analysis Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Engineering Analysis Methodology amended, prescribes energy 2. Representative Units Table of Contents conservation standards for various 3. Design Option Combinations consumer products and certain I. Summary of the Final Rule and Its Benefits 4. A and B Loss Value Inputs 5. Materials Prices commercial and industrial equipment, A. Benefits and Costs to Customers B. Impact on Manufacturers 6. Markups including distribution transformers. a. Factory Overhead EPCA also requires the U.S. Department C. National Benefits D. Conclusion b. Labor Costs of Energy (DOE) to determine whether II. Introduction c. Shipping Costs more-stringent standards would be A. Authority 7. Baseline Efficiency and Efficiency Levels technologically feasible and B. Background 8. Scaling Methodology economically justified, and would save 1. Current Standards a. kVA Scaling a significant amount of energy. In this 2. History of Standards Rulemaking for b. Phase Count Scaling final rule, DOE is adopting more- Distribution Transformers 9. Material Availability III. General Discussion 10. Primary Voltage Sensitivities stringent energy conservation standards 11. Impedance for distribution transformers. It has A. Test Procedures 1. General 12. Size and Weight determined that the amended energy 2. Multiple kVA Ratings D. Markups Analysis conservation standards for this 3. Dual/Multiple Basic Impulse Level E. Energy Use Analysis equipment would result in significant 4. Dual/Multiple-Voltage Primary F. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period conservation of energy, and are Windings Analysis technologically feasible and 5. Dual/Multiple-Voltage Secondary 1. Modeling Transformer Purchase economically justified. Windings Decision 6. Loading 2. Inputs Affecting Installed Cost DATES: The effective date of this rule is B. Technological Feasibility a. Equipment Costs June 17, 2013. Compliance with the 1. General b. Installation Costs amended standards established for 2. Maximum Technologically Feasible 3. Inputs Affecting Operating Costs distribution transformers in this final Levels a. Transformer Loading rule is required as of January 1, 2016. C. Energy Savings b. Load Growth Trends ADDRESSES: The docket for this 1. Determination of Savings c. Electricity Costs rulemaking is available for review at 2. Significance of Savings d. Electricity Price Trends D. Economic Justification e. Standards Compliance Date www.regulations.gov, including Federal 1. Specific Criteria f. Discount Rates Register notices, framework documents, a. Economic Impact on Manufacturers and g. Lifetime public meeting attendee lists and Consumers h. Base Case Efficiency transcripts, comments, negotiated b. Life-Cycle Costs i. Inputs to Payback Period Analysis rulemaking, and other supporting c. Energy Savings j. Rebuttable-Presumption Payback Period documents/materials. All documents in d. Lessening of Utility or Performance of G. National Impact Analysis—National the docket are listed in the Equipment Energy Savings and Net Present Value www.regulations.gov index. However, e. Impact of Any Lessening of Competition Analysis not all documents listed in the index f. Need for National Energy Conservation 1. Shipments g. Other Factors 2. Efficiency Trends may be publicly available, such as 2. Rebuttable Presumption 3. National Energy Savings information that is exempt from public IV. Methodology and Discussion of Related 4. Equipment Price Forecast disclosure. Comments 5. Net Present Value of Customer Benefit A link to the docket Web page can be A. Market and Technology Assessment H. Customer Subgroup Analysis found at: http://www.regulations.gov/ 1. Scope of Coverage I. Manufacturer Impact Analysis #!docketDetail;rpp=10;po=0;D=EERE- a. Definitions 1. Overview 2010-BT-STD-0048. The regulations.gov b. Underground and Surface Mining 2. Product and Capital Conversion Costs Web page will contain simple Transformer Coverage a. Product Conversion Costs instructions on how to access all c. Step-Up Transformers b. Capital Conversion Costs documents, including public comments, d. Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution 3. Markup Scenarios Transformers 4. Other Key GRIM Inputs in the docket. e. Negotiating Committee Discussion of 5. Discussion of Comments For further information on how to Scope a. Core Steel review the docket, contact Ms. Brenda 2. Equipment Classes b. Small Manufacturers Edwards at (202) 586–2945 or by email: a. Less-Flammable Liquid-Immersed c. Conversion Costs [email protected]. Transformers 6. Manufacturer Interviews VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:23 Apr 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18APR2.SGM 18APR2 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 75 / Thursday, April 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 23337 7. Sub-Group Impact Analysis 2. Summary of and Responses to the economically justified. (42 U.S.C. J. Employment Impact Analysis Significant Issues Raised by the Public 6295(o)(2)(A), 6316(a)) Furthermore, any K. Utility Impact Analysis Comments, and a Statement of Any new or amended standard must result in L. Emissions Analysis Changes Made as a Result of Such significant conservation of energy. (42 M. Monetizing Carbon Dioxide and Other Comments Emissions Impacts 3. Description and Estimated Number of U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)(B), 6316(a)) In 1. Social Cost of Carbon Small Entities Regulated accordance with these and other a. Monetizing Carbon Dioxide Emissions a. Methodology for Estimating the Number statutory provisions addressed in this b. Social Cost of Carbon Values Used in of Small Entities rulemaking, DOE is adopting amended Past Regulatory Analyses b. Distribution Transformer Industry energy conservation standards for c. Current Approach and Key Assumptions Structure distribution transformers. The amended 2. Valuation of Other Emissions c. Comparison Between Large and Small standards are summarized in Table I.1 Reductions Entities through Table I.3. Table I.4 shows the N. Labeling Requirements 4. Description and Estimate of Compliance O. Discussion of Other Comments mapping of trial standard levels (TSLs) Requirements 2 1. Supplementary Trial Standard Levels a. Liquid-Immersed to energy efficiency levels (ELs), and 2. Efficiency Levels b. Low-Voltage Dry-Type Table I.5 through Table I.8 show the 3. Impact of Standards on Transformer c. Medium-Voltage Dry-Type standards in terms of minimum Refurbishment d. Summary of Compliance Impacts electrical efficiency. These amended 4. Alternative Means of Saving Energy 5. Steps Taken To Minimize Impacts on standards apply to all equipment that is 5. Alternative Rulemaking Procedures Small Entities and Reasons Why Other listed in Table I.1 and manufactured in, 6. Proposed Standards—Weighting of Significant Alternatives to Today’s Final Benefits vs. Burdens or imported into, the United States on Rule Were Rejected or after January 1, 2016. As discussed in a. General Comments 6. Duplication, Overlap, and Conflict With b. Standards on Liquid-Immersed Other Rules and Regulations section IV.C.8 of this preamble, any Distribution Transformers 7. Significant Alternatives to Today’s Rule distribution transformer having a c. Standards on Low-Voltage Dry-Type 8. Significant Issues Raised by Public kilovolt-ampere (kVA) rating falling Distribution Transformers Comments between the kVA ratings shown in the d. Standards on Medium-Voltage Dry-Type 9. Steps DOE Has Taken To Minimize the tables shall meet a minimum energy Distribution Transformers Economic Impact on Small efficiency level calculated by a linear e. Response to Comments on Standards Manufacturers Proposed in Notice of Proposed interpolation of the minimum efficiency C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction requirements of the kVA ratings Rulemaking Act V. Analytical Results and Conclusions D. Review Under the National