May/June 2012 Issue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
First Level Design and System Design of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander Jahir Fernandez University of Texas at El Paso, J [email protected]
University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2017-01-01 First Level Design And System Design Of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander Jahir Fernandez University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Fernandez, Jahir, "First Level Design And System Design Of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander" (2017). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 444. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/444 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIRST LEVEL DESIGN AND SYSTEM DESIGN OF JANUS LIQUID OXYGEN-LIQUID METHANE LANDER JAHIR FERNANDEZ Master’s Program in Mechanical Engineering APPROVED: Ahsan Choudhuri, Ph.D., Chair John F. Chessa, Ph.D., Co-chair Luis Rene Contreras, Ph.D. Charles H. Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © By Jahir Fernandez 2017 FIRST LEVEL DESIGN AND SYSTEM DESIGN OF JANUS LIQUID OXYGEN-LIQUID METHANE LANDER By JAHIR FERNANDEZ, B.S. MECHANICAL ENGINEERIN THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Mechanical Engineering THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Ahsan Choudhuri for the opportunity to work at the cSETR. It has been an amazing experience working at the center, where the research has opened many doors for me and through which I was able to intern with NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center. -
액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 Development Trends of Liquid
Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 119-143, 2021 119 Technical Paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2021.25.2.119 액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 임병직 a, * ㆍ 김철웅 a⋅ 이금오 a ㆍ 이기주 a ㆍ 박재성 a ㆍ 안규복 b ㆍ 남궁혁준 c ㆍ 윤영빈 d Development Trends of Liquid Methane Rocket Engine and Implications Byoungjik Lim a, * ㆍ Cheulwoong Kim a⋅ Keum-Oh Lee a ㆍ Keejoo Lee a ㆍ Jaesung Park a ㆍ Kyubok Ahn b ㆍ Hyuck-Joon Namkoung c ㆍ Youngbin Yoon d a Future Launcher R&D Program Office, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Korea b School of Mechanical Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Korea c Guided Munitions Team, Hyundai Rotem, Korea d Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Selecting liquid methane as fuel is a prevailing trend for recent rocket engine developments around the world, triggered by its affordability, reusability, storability for deep space exploration, and prospect for in-situ resource utilization. Given years of time required for acquiring a new rocket engine, a national-level R&D program to develop a methane engine is highly desirable at the earliest opportunity in order to catch up with this worldwide trend towards reusing launch vehicles for competitiveness and mission flexibility. In light of the monumental cost associated with development, fabrication, and testing of a booster stage engine, it is strategically a prudent choice to start with a low-thrust engine and build up space application cases. -
Forever Remembered
July 2015 Vol. 2 No. 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine FOREVER REMEMBERED Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond NASA’S National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCH KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: July 3, 12:55 a.m. EDT Mission: Progress 60P Cargo Craft CONTENTS Description: In early July, the Progress 60P resupply vehicle — 4 �������������������Solemn shuttle exhibit shares enduring lessons an automated, unpiloted version of the Soyuz spacecraft that is used to ����������������Flyby will provide best ever view of Pluto 10 bring supplies and fuel — launches 14 ����������������New Horizons spacecraft hones in on Pluto to the International Space Station. http://go.nasa.gov/1HUAYbO 24 ����������������Firing Room 4 used for RESOLVE mission simulation Date: July 22, 5:02 p.m. EDT 28 ����������������SpaceX, NASA will rebound from CRS-7 loss Mission: Expedition 44 Launch to 29 ����������������Backup docking adapter to replace lost IDA-1 the ISS Description: In late July, Kjell SHUN FUJIMURA 31 ����������������Thermal Protection System Facility keeping up Lindgren of NASA, Kimiya Yui of JAXA and Oleg Kononenko of am an education specialist in the Education Projects and 35 ����������������New crew access tower takes shape at Cape Roscosmos launch aboard a Soyuz I Youth Engagement Office. I work to inspire students to pursue science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or 36 ����������������Innovative thinking converts repair site into garden spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan to the STEM, careers and with teachers to better integrate STEM 38 ����������������Proposals in for new class of launch services space station. -
Foundational Methane Propulsion Related Technology Efforts, and Challenges for Applications to Human Exploration Beyond Earth Orbit
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160006983 2019-07-23T15:36:47+00:00Z Foundational Methane Propulsion Related Technology Efforts, and Challenges for Applications to Human Exploration Beyond Earth Orbit SPACE PROPULSION 2016 MARRIOTT PARK HOTEL, ROME, ITALY / 2-6 May 2016 Thomas Brown Mark Klem Patrick McRight NASA Engineering and Safety Center Propulsion Division Propulsion Department NASA Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Glenn Research Center NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35812 Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Huntsville, AL 35812 Agenda • Introduction • Background • Needs for Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO) human exploration • LOX/CH4 Igniters • Reaction Control System (RCS) Thrusters • Large (870 – 1000 lbf) LOX/LH2 and LOX/Ethanol thrusters (TRW & Aerojet) • 100 lbf LOX/CH4 thrusters (Aerojet & Northrop Grumman) • Main Engine Injector Parametric Testing • Pressure Fed Main Engine Efforts • 7500 lbf LOX/CH4 (XCOR & KT Engineering) • 5500 lbf LOX/CH4 (Aerojet) • Additively Manufactured 4K Regeneratively Cooled Engine • Pump Fed Main Engine Efforts • Common Extensible Cryogenic Engine – LOX/LH2 throttle-able engine • 7000 lbf LOX/LH2 (TRW/Northrop Grumman) • 7000 lbf LOX/LH2 two stage injector • Current efforts with the Additive Manufacturing Demonstration engine • Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) and Distribution • Integrated Systems Demonstration • Challenges for future Human Exploration • Summary and Conclusions 2 Introduction Background • Human, beyond earth orbit, exploration architecture studies have identified Methane/Oxygen -
The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly. -
GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, and CONTROL 2020 AAS PRESIDENT Carol S
GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL 2020 AAS PRESIDENT Carol S. Lane Cynergy LLC VICE PRESIDENT – PUBLICATIONS James V. McAdams KinetX Inc. EDITOR Jastesh Sud Lockheed Martin Space SERIES EDITOR Robert H. Jacobs Univelt, Incorporated Front Cover Illustration: Image: Checkpoint-Rehearsal-Movie-1024x720.gif Caption: “OSIRIS-REx Buzzes Sample Site Nightingale” Photo and Caption Credit: NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona Public Release Approval: Per multimedia guidelines from NASA Frontispiece Illustration: Image: NASA_Orion_EarthRise.jpg Caption: “Orion Primed for Deep Space Exploration” Photo Credit: NASA Public Release Approval: Per multimedia guidelines from NASA GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL 2020 Volume 172 ADVANCES IN THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES Edited by Jastesh Sud Proceedings of the 43rd AAS Rocky Mountain Section Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference held January 30 to February 5, 2020, Breckenridge, Colorado Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt, Incorporated, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, California 92198 Web Site: http://www.univelt.com Copyright 2020 by AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY AAS Publications Office P.O. Box 28130 San Diego, California 92198 Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science Member of the International Astronautical Federation First Printing 2020 Library of Congress Card No. 57-43769 ISSN 0065-3438 ISBN 978-0-87703-669-2 (Hard Cover Plus CD ROM) ISBN 978-0-87703-670-8 (Digital Version) Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt, Incorporated, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, California 92198 Web Site: http://www.univelt.com Printed and Bound in the U.S.A. FOREWORD HISTORICAL SUMMARY The annual American Astronautical Society Rocky Mountain Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference began as an informal exchange of ideas and reports of achievements among local guidance and control specialists. -
Newsletter Archive the Skyscraper August 2011
the vol. 38 no. 8 August Skyscraper 2011 Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode Island 47 Peeptoad Road North Scituate, Rhode Island 02857 www.theSkyscrapers.org August Meeting with Tom Thibault Friday, August 5, 7:30pm Seagrave Memorial Observatory Skyscrapers president Tom Thibault will Recently talk about “The Merits of Maintaining an improved Observing Log”. He will touch upon the northern reasons for his interest in astronomy and the & eastern timeline of his increasing involvement. The horizons, focus of his presentation will be why, how, thanks to our and what he includes in log entries as well as where the particular journal he utilizes can neighbor be purchased. Gene Allen. In this issue… 2 President’s Message 3 The Constellations in August Phases 4 August Meteor Shower to be Mooned Out & of the Observing the Moon Last Quarter Moon 6 13 21 28 6 July Reports Other notable events: Vesta is at opposition on the 5th. Perseid meteor shower peaks on the 8 New GOES-R to 12th-13th. Venus is at superior conjunction on the 16th. Mercury is at inferior conjunction Give More on the 16th. Neptune is at opposition on the 22nd. 8 Tornado Warning Time 9 The 30-Year Legacy of Seagrave Memorial Observatory NASA’s Remarkable is open to the public Spacecraft: The weather permitting Space Shuttles Saturdays: 9:00-11:00 pm 8:00 - 10:00 pm beginning August 27 15 AstroAssembly 2011 Registration 2 The Skyscraper August 2011 President’s Message Tom Thibault The Skyscraper is published monthly by Skyscrapers, Inc. Meetings are usually held Dear Skyscrapers Members, desserts that satisfied so many. -
Cfd Kinetic Scheme Validation for Liquid Rocket Engine Fuelled by Oxygen/Methane
DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-680 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) CFD KINETIC SCHEME VALIDATION FOR LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE FUELLED BY OXYGEN/METHANE Pasquale Natale*, Guido Saccone** and Francesco Battista*** * Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali Via Maiorise, 81043 Capua (CE), Italy, [email protected] **Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali Via Maiorise, 81043 Capua (CE), Italy,[email protected] ***Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali Via Maiorise, 81043 Capua (CE), Italy,[email protected] Abstract In recent years, greater attention has been paid to green propellants, among those liquid methane is one of the most promising choice. This has also been encouraged by the abolition of hydrazine for its intrinsic human-rating concerns. On the other hand, the adoption of methane as a fuel introduces some issues about modelling. Detailed kinetic schemes are required to properly reconstruct combustion process. This is especially true for rocket propulsion problems, in which the combustion is characterized by high pressure and not stoichiometric mixture ratio. Moreover, detailed scheme may not be feasible for CFD applications, due to high computational cost. For this reason, adoption of reduced schemes is encouraged, even if detailed mechanism description is required. In the present work, a reduced kinetic scheme (HPRB, by CIRA) will be presented for a specific LRE application. Some experimental firing-tests (i.e. FSBB test-campaign) will then be compared with model results, in order to validate the proposed model. 1. Introduction Traditionally, high performance rocket engines have used LOX and hydrogen or LOX and kerosene, while, as such, methane has not yet been used in a commercial launch vehicle. -
(Preprint) AAS 16-113 ORION BURN MANAGEMENT, NOMINAL AND
(Preprint) AAS 16-113 ORION BURN MANAGEMENT, NOMINAL AND RESPONSE TO FAILURES Ryan Odegard,∗ John L. Goodman,y Charles P. Barrett,z Kara Pohlkamp,x and Shane Robinson{ An approach for managing Orion on-orbit burn execution is described for nom- inal and failure response scenarios. The burn management strategy for Orion takes into account per-burn variations in targeting, timing, and execution; crew and ground operator intervention and overrides; defined burn failure triggers and responses; and corresponding on-board software sequencing functionality. Burn- to-burn variations are managed through the identification of specific parameters that may be updated for each progressive burn. Failure triggers and automatic re- sponses during the burn timeframe are defined to provide safety for the crew in the case of vehicle failures, along with override capabilities to ensure operational control of the vehicle. On-board sequencing software provides the timeline coor- dination for performing the required activities related to targeting, burn execution, and responding to burn failures. INTRODUCTION The trend of increasing automation and autonomy of NASA’s crewed spacecraft continues with Orion. The exploration mission flight profiles, communications time delays, and a requirement for vehicle return in the event of loss of communications drive a need for a greater level of on- board automation (no human interaction with the flight computer or spacecraft) and autonomy (no Mission Control interaction with the spacecraft or crew). Management of on-board systems for burns is a major factor in the design of the Orion automation and sequencing. The design must also accommodate crew or Mission Control override of automated burn sequencing. -
Zero Robotics Tournaments
Collaborative Competition for Crowdsourcing Spaceflight Software and STEM Education using SPHERES Zero Robotics by Sreeja Nag B.S. Exploration Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 2009 M.S. Exploration Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 2009 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Signature of Author ____________________________________________________________________ Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Division May 11, 2012 Certified by __________________________________________________________________________ Jeffrey A. Hoffman Professor of Practice in Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Certified by __________________________________________________________________________ Olivier L. de Weck Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by __________________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee Accepted by __________________________________________________________________________ Joel P. Clark Professor of Materials Systems and Engineering Systems Acting Director, -
FINAL PROGRAM #Aiaascitech
4–8 JANUARY 2016 SAN DIEGO, CA The Largest Event for Aerospace Research, Development, and Technology FINAL PROGRAM www.aiaa-SciTech.org #aiaaSciTech 16-928 WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE TODAY WON’T BE TOMORROW. AT LOCKHEED MARTIN, WE’RE ENGINEERING A BETTER TOMORROW. We are partnering with our customers to accelerate manufacturing innovation from the laboratory to production. We push the limits in additive manufacturing, advanced materials, digital manufacturing and next generation electronics. Whether it is solving a global crisis like the need for clean drinking water or travelling even deeper into space, advanced manufacturing is opening the doors to the next great human revolution. Learn more at lockheedmartin.com © 2014 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION VC377_164 Executive Steering Committee AIAA SciTech 2016 2O16 Welcome Welcome to the AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2016 (AIAA SciTech 2016) – the world’s largest event for aerospace research, development, and technology. We are confident that you will come away from San Diego inspired and with the tools necessary to continue shaping the future of aerospace in new and exciting ways. From hearing preeminent industry thought leaders, to attending sessions where cutting- edge research will be unveiled, to interacting with peers – this will be a most fulfilling week! Our organizing committee has worked hard over the past year to ensure that our plenary sessions examine the most critical issues facing aerospace today, such as aerospace science and Richard George Lesieutre technology policy, lessons learned from a half century of aerospace innovation, resilient design, Christiansen The Pennsylvania and unmanned aerial systems. We will also focus on how AIAA and other stakeholders in State University Sierra Lobo, Inc. -
Prime Contractors for Razaksat & Dubaisat
24th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Aug 9 – 13, 2009 Sungdong Park President & CEO Satrec Initiative March, 2008 / 1 What happened 18 Years ago in Korea? August 10, 2010 / 2 What happened 18 Years ago in Korea? August 10, 2010 / 3 Satrec Initiative (SI) in Brief Prime contractors for RazakSAT & DubaiSat XSAT, RASAT, & GOKTURK-2 EO Payloads Supplier Founded in December 1999 by old KITSATians Locates in Daedeok Science Town, Daejeon, Korea Over 130 full-time staff Listed on KOADAQ in 2008 August 10, 2010 / 4 Conventional EO Satellites Mass Launch Resolution (m) Swath Country Satellite (kg) Year PAN MS (# of Ch’s) (km) USA WorldView-1 2,500 2007 0.45 1.8 (4) 16 Thailand THEOS 750 2008 2 15 (4) 22 / 90 USA GeoEye-1 907 2008 0.41 1.64 (4) 15.2 India Cartosat-2A 690 2008 1 NA 9.6 USA WorldView-2 2,800 2009 0.46 1.8 (8) 16.4 Israel EROS-C 350 2010 0.7 2.8 (4) 11 India Cartosat-2B 694 2010 1 NA 9.6 France Pleiades-1 1,000 2010 0.7 2.8 (4) 20 Korea KOMPSAT-3 800 2011 0.7 2.8 (4) 16.8 France Pleiades-2 1,000 2011 0.7 2.8 (4) 20 Korea KOMPSAT-3A 1,000 2012 0.7 2.8 (4) 16.8 Turkey GOKTURK-1 1,000 2013 1 4 (4) 15 August 10, 2010 / 5 Conventional EO Satellites 3.0 2.5 2.0 THEOS 1.5 Cartosat-2B Cartosat-2A GOKTURK-1 Resolution (m) 1.0 KOMPSAT-3 KOMPSAT-3A 0.5 WV-1 WV-2 EROS-C Pleiades-2 GE-1 Pleiades-1 0.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Launch Year August 10, 2010 / 6 Small EO Satellites Mass Launch Resolution (m) Swath Country Satellite (kg) Year Pan MS(Bands) (km) Germany RapidEye (5) 150 2008 - 6.5 (5) 78 Malaysia RazakSAT