<<

Estimates of the Uncertainty of Velocity Measurements

The (incompressible) velocity measured by a Pitot static tube and a based instrument (such as our FKT series meter) is calculated from the recorded differential (or dynamic) pressure, q, and , , of the fluid. The velocity is given by

2 ∙ 푞 푉 = √ 휌

If the density is calculated using the law then the velocity, based on dynamic pressure (q), temperature (T) and ambient pressure (P) sensor readings, becomes

2 ∙ 푞 ∙ 푅 ∙ 푇 푉 = √ 푃 where R is the gas constant. Temperature is in absolute units (such as Kelvin or Rankine).

Each sensor reading (q, P, and T) has an uncertainty (U) associated with it, so the full velocity uncertainty may be expressed below: (see http://www.flowkinetics.com/uncertainty-analysis.htm)

휕푉 2 휕푉 2 휕푉 2 푈 = √( ) 푈 2 + ( ) 푈 2 + ( ) 푈 2 푉 휕푞 푞 휕푇 푇 휕푃 푃

Substituting the differentials, based on the velocity equation, the above expression becomes:

2 푅 2 ∙ 푃 2 푞 ∙ 푇 ∙ 푈 푈 = ∙ √ √(푇 ∙ 푈 ) + (푞 ∙ 푈 )2 + ( 푃) 푉 2푃 푞 ∙ 푅 ∙ 푇 푞 푇 푃

The uncertainty for each reading depends on the characteristics of each sensor and should be determined from the manufacture’s specifications.

As an example, assume a test with the following test conditions and parameters:

푃 = 101325 푃푎 (Ambient pressure)

푇 = 293.15 퐾 (20℃) (Ambient temperature)

퐽표푢푙푒 푅 = 287.026 (Gas constant for air) 푘푔∙퐾

푞 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒 = 1240 푃푎 (Full scale dynamic pressure for a 5 inchH2O sensor)

FlowKinetics™ LLC • 4700 Shoal Creek Dr, College Station, TX 77845 USA • www.flowkinetics.com • [email protected] • Tel/Fax: USA-(979) 680-0659 Copyright  2001-2019 FlowKinetics™ LLC  Printed in the USA 푉 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒 = 45.5 푚/푠푒푐 (Full scale velocity for a 5 inchH2O sensor)

푃 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒 = 115000 푃푎 (Full scale pressure for absolute/ambient sensor)

Using the values above the uncertainties are:

푈푞 = ±0.1% 표푓 푞 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒 = ±1.2 푃푎

푈푇 = ±1℃ 표푟 ± 1퐾 (Fixed value)

푈푃 = ±0.5% 표푓 푃푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒 = ±552 푃푎

Using the above values in the full uncertainty expression and plotting for different values of dynamic pressure, as a ratio to full scale differential pressure, gives

1.2

1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Vel uncertaintyVelFS vel) of (%

0.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Diff pressure / FS diff. pressure

FlowKinetics™ LLC • 4700 Shoal Creek Dr, College Station, TX 77845 USA • www.flowkinetics.com • [email protected] • Tel/Fax: USA-(979) 680-0659 Copyright  2001-2019 FlowKinetics™ LLC  Printed in the USA The uncertainty, as a function of velocity, is shown below:

1.2

1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Vel uncertaintyVelFS vel) of (%

0.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Vel / FS Vel

The plots show, as with any Pitot based system, that the uncertainty in the velocity is larger than that in the differential pressure. However, as long as measurements are not taken at the low end of the transducer’s range, accuracy is still maintained.

To prevent large velocity uncertainties the dynamic pressure should not be measured below a certain point. For this example we can assume that the desired maximum allowable uncertainty in velocity is 1% of full scale velocity. Substituting this value into the equations above and solving for the minimum dynamic pressure results in the following:

푞 푚푖푛푖푚푢푚 = 0.25% 푞 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒

Or in terms of velocity: 푉 푚푖푛푖푚푢푚 = 5% 푉 푓푢푙푙 푠푐푎푙푒

So for our example the minimum dynamic pressure for a maximum of 1% velocity uncertainty is

푞 푚푖푛푖푚푢푚 = 3.1 푃푎

푉 푚푖푛푖푚푢푚 = 2.27 푚/푠푒푐

So the recommended velocity range is 2.27 to 45.46 m/sec. Readings taken below the minimum will have uncertainties above 1% of full scale velocity and may not be useful for practical purposes.

FlowKinetics™ LLC • 4700 Shoal Creek Dr, College Station, TX 77845 USA • www.flowkinetics.com • [email protected] • Tel/Fax: USA-(979) 680-0659 Copyright  2001-2019 FlowKinetics™ LLC  Printed in the USA