DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Lecture slides Challenge the future 1 Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Aerodynamics 11&12 Prof. H. Bijl ir. N. Timmer 11 & 12. Airfoils and finite wings Anderson 5.9 – end of chapter 5 excl. 5.19 Topics lecture 11 & 12 • Pressure distributions and lift • Finite wings • Swept wings 3 Pressure coefficient Typical example Definition of pressure coefficient : p − p -Cp = ∞ Cp q∞ upper side lower side -1.0 Stagnation point: p=p t … p t-p∞=q ∞ => C p=1 4 Example 5.6 • The pressure on a point on the wing of an airplane is 7.58x10 4 N/m2. The airplane is flying with a velocity of 70 m/s at conditions associated with standard altitude of 2000m. Calculate the pressure coefficient at this point on the wing 4 2 3 2000 m: p ∞=7.95.10 N/m ρ∞=1.0066 kg/m − = p p ∞ = − C p Cp 1.50 q∞ 5 Obtaining lift from pressure distribution leading edge θ V∞ trailing edge s p ds dy θ dx = ds cos θ 6 Obtaining lift from pressure distribution TE TE Normal force per meter span: = θ − θ N ∫ pl cos ds ∫ pu cos ds LE LE c c θ = = − with ds cos dx N ∫ pl dx ∫ pu dx 0 0 NN Write dimensionless force coefficient : C = = n 1 ρ 2 2 Vc∞ qc ∞ 1 1 p − p x 1 p − p x x = l ∞ − u ∞ C = ()C −C d Cn d d n ∫ pl pu ∫ q c ∫ q c 0 ∞ 0 ∞ 0 c 7 T=Lsin α - Dcosα N=Lcos α + Dsinα L R N α T D V α = angle of attack 8 Obtaining lift from normal force coefficient =α − α =α − α L Ncos T sin cl c ncos c t sin L N T =cosα − sin α qc∞ qc ∞ qc ∞ For small angle of attack α≤5o : cos α ≈ 1, sin α ≈ 0 1 1 C≈() CCdx − () l∫ pl p u c 0 9 Example 5.11 Consider an airfoil with chord length c and the running distance x measured along the chord. The leading edge is located at x/c=0 and the trailing edge at x/c=1. The pressure coefficient variations over the upper and lower surfaces are given as x2 x C =−1 300 for 0 ≤≤ 0.1 p, u c c x x C =−+2.2277 2.2777 for 0.1 ≤≤ 1.0 p, u c c x x C =−1 0.95 for 0 ≤≤ 1.0 p, l c c Calculate the normal force coefficient. 10 Compressibility correction of the pressure coefficient Compressibility correction Cp at a certain point M 1.0 Approximate theoretical correction (valid for 0 < M < 0.7) : C C = 0,p Prandtl-Glauert Rule p 2 1− M∞ 11 Compressibility correction for lift coefficient c (C− C) dx( ) c 1pl p u 1 1 ≈o = − () Cl ()Cp C p dx ∫2 2 ∫ l u o c0 1−MM∞ 1 − ∞ c 0 1 c C≡() CCdx − () C l,0 ∫ pl p u o l c 0 C M> C = l,0 l 2 1− M ∞ α 12 Example 5.12 • Consider an NACA 4412 airfoil at an angle of attack of 4 o. If the free-stream Mach number is 0.7, what is the lift coefficient? o • - From App. D for angle of attack of 4 , c l = 0.83.However, these data were obtained at low speeds. 13 Critical Mach number and critical pressure coefficient M=0.3 Mpeak =0.44 M=0.5 Mpeak =0.71 M=0.6 Mpeak =1.00 Critical Mach number for the airfoil 14 Critical pressure coefficient Cp,min thick thick medium -1.5 medium thin -1.0 = -0.5 thin C cr,p f (M∞) M 1.0 Thicker airfoil reaches critical pressure coefficient at a lower value of M∞ 15 Critical pressure coefficient − Definition of pressure coefficient : = p p∞ = p∞ p − Cp 1 q∞ q∞ p∞ ρ = 1 ρ 2 = 1 ∞ γ 2 Dynamic pressure : q∞ 2 ∞V∞ 2 p∞V∞ γp∞ 2 = 1 V∞ γ 2 p∞ γp∞ /ρ∞ 2 γ 1 V∞ 2 2 γp∞ q = γp = p M We have found before : a = thus : ∞ 2 2 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ a∞ 2 ρ∞ γ p γ −1 γ −1 For isentropic flow we found : 0 = 1 + M2 p 2 γ γ − p0 γ −1 2 1 and also : = 1 + M∞ p∞ 2 Dividing these equations we find :... 16 Critical pressure coefficient γ 1+ 1 (γ − )1 M2 γ −1 p = 2 ∞ 2 p∞ + 1 γ − 1 2 ( )1 M Substitution in Cp-equation gives : γ 1 2 γ −1 p p p 1+ (γ − )1 M∞ = ∞ − = ∞ 2 − Cp 1 2 2 1 q∞ p∞ 1 γp M 1+ 1 (γ − )1 M 2 ∞ ∞ 2 γ 1 2 γ −1 1+ (γ − )1 M∞ or : = 2 2 − Cp 1 γM2 1+ 1 (γ − )1 M2 ∞ 2 17 Critical pressure coefficient The critical pressure coefficient is found when M=1 is reached : γ 2 γ −1 2 2 + (γ −1)M∞ C = −1 p , cr 2 γ + γM∞ 1 2 cp ( M) cr 1 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 M 18 The intersection of this curve with the airfoil C P,min will give the value of the M cr specific for the airfoil under consideration. γ 2 1+ []()γ −1 / 2 M 2 γ −1 = cr − C ,crp 2 1 γM 1+ []()γ −1 / 2 cr Airfoil independent curve C C = p,0min M pmin 2 cr 1− M ∞ Airfoil dependent curve 19 Drag divergence 20 Drag divergence M<1 M∞<Mcr M<1 M>1 Mcr <M∞<Mdrag divergence M<1 shock wave M>1 M<1 M >M ∞ drag divergence Separated flow 21 Drag divergence Development of supercritical airfoils -Cp Cp,cr x/c 22 23 Finite Wings 24 Characteristics of finite wings tip vortex low pressure Flow around the ----- wing tip generates + + + + + tip vortices high pressure 25 26 Tip vortices Cross section of tip vortex R Vθ Induced velocity V∞ V∞ w local flow vector The trailing tip vortex causes downwash, w 27 Induced drag α i L L’ geometric angle of α attack α V∞ i α 28 Induced drag α = α i Di Lsin i L’ induced drag, D i geometric angle of α attack α V∞ i α α eff 29 Induced drag α = α i Di Lsin i L’ induced drag, D i geometric angle of α attack α V∞ i α α α α≈ α α eff Since small : sin i i D i = L i 30 Induced drag Example : elliptical lift distribution FRONT VIEW elliptical lift distribution Elliptical lift distribution results in constant downwash and therefore constant downwash, w induced angle of attack C From incompressible flow theory : α = L i π A 2 b2 C where : A = (Aspect ratio) Thus : C = L S Di πA 31 32 33 Effect of aspect ratio on induced drag High aspect ratio : Low Induced Drag DG 200 DG 500 Low aspect ratio : High Induced Drag Mirage 2000 34 Span efficiency factor C2 C = L Di π A e span efficiency factor (Oswald factor) Elliptical loading : e = 1 ; minimum induced drag Non-elliptical loading : e < 1 ; higher induced drag The total drag of the wing can now be written as : C 2 C = C + L D D p π A e Profile drag Induced drag 35 Example 5.19 • Consider a flying wing with wing area of 206 m2, an aspect ratio of 10, a span effectiveness factor of 0.95, and an NACA 4412 airfoil. The weight of the airplane is 7.5x10 5 N. If the density altitude is 3 km and the flight velocity is 100 m/s, calculate the total drag on the aircraft. 36 Lift curve slope geometric α eff angle of attack α α i V∞ The effect of a finite wing is to reduce the wing lift curve slope 37 Lift curve slope The induced angle of attack reduces α = α − α The local effective angle of attack : eff i For a wing of a general plan form we may write : C Angle is in radians! α = L e is span effectiveness factor i π 1 A e1 (theoretically different from e but in practice more or less the same) 57.3 C α = L i π For angle in degrees Ae 1 38 Lift curve slope infinite wing (effective angle of attack) dC a = l 0 dα CL a0 finite wing (geometric angle of attack) a dC a = L dα α From thin airfoil theory we find : = π a 0 2 39 Lift curve slope Effective local angle of attack αeff = α − αi For an arbitrary loading distribution wing we find : dC α = C L L = a Integrate : i π α − α 0 Ae 1 d( i ) C C = a (α−α )+const, C = a α − L + const L 0 i L 0 π Ae 1 a α const C = 0 + L a a 1+ 0 1+ 0 π π Ae 1 Ae 1 40 Lift curve slope dC a Differentiating this equation results in : L = 0 dα a 1 + 0 π Ae 1 Example : dC Infinite wing : A= ∞ then L = 2π dα dC L Finite wings : A=12 (Fokker 50) then = 2π⋅0.857 = 1.71 π dα dC A=5 then L = 2π⋅0.714 =1.43 π dα 41 dC a dC a =L = 0 a = l α a 0 dα d 1+ 0 π Ae 1 dC a L = 0 a per degree α 57.3 a 0 d 1+ 0 π Ae 1 42 Example 5.21 • Consider a wing with an aspect ratio of 10 and NACA 23012 airfoil section.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerodynamics Material - Taylor & Francis
    CopyrightAerodynamics material - Taylor & Francis ______________________________________________________________________ 257 Aerodynamics Symbol List Symbol Definition Units a speed of sound ⁄ a speed of sound at sea level ⁄ A area aspect ratio ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ b wing span c chord length c Copyrightmean aerodynamic material chord- Taylor & Francis specific heat at constant pressure of air · root chord tip chord specific heat at constant volume of air · / quarter chord total drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , induced drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , parasite drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , wave drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ local skin friction coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ lift coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , compressible lift coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ compressible moment ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , coefficient , pitching moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , rolling moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , yawing moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ______________________________________________________________________ 258 Aerodynamics Aerodynamics Symbol List (cont.) Symbol Definition Units pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ compressible pressure ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , coefficient , critical pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , supersonic pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ D total drag induced drag Copyright material - Taylor & Francis parasite drag e span efficiency factor ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ L lift pitching moment · rolling moment · yawing moment · M mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ critical mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ free stream mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ P static pressure ⁄ total pressure ⁄ free stream pressure ⁄ q dynamic pressure ⁄ R
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER TWO - Static Aeroelasticity – Unswept Wing Structural Loads and Performance 21 2.1 Background
    Static aeroelasticity – structural loads and performance CHAPTER TWO - Static Aeroelasticity – Unswept wing structural loads and performance 21 2.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.2 Scope and purpose ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.2 The structures enterprise and its relation to aeroelasticity ............................................................ 22 2.1.3 The evolution of aircraft wing structures-form follows function ................................................ 24 2.2 Analytical modeling............................................................................................................... 30 2.2.1 The typical section, the flying door and Rayleigh-Ritz idealizations ................................................ 31 2.2.2 – Functional diagrams and operators – modeling the aeroelastic feedback process ....................... 33 2.3 Matrix structural analysis – stiffness matrices and strain energy .......................................... 34 2.4 An example - Construction of a structural stiffness matrix – the shear center concept ........ 38 2.5 Subsonic aerodynamics - fundamentals ................................................................................ 40 2.5.1 Reference points – the center of pressure..................................................................................... 44 2.5.2 A different
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamics of High-Performance Wing Sails
    Aerodynamics of High-Performance Wing Sails J. otto Scherer^ Some of tfie primary requirements for tiie design of wing sails are discussed. In particular, ttie requirements for maximizing thrust when sailing to windward and tacking downwind are presented. The results of water channel tests on six sail section shapes are also presented. These test results Include the data for the double-slotted flapped wing sail designed by David Hubbard for A. F. Dl Mauro's lYRU "C" class catamaran Patient Lady II. Introduction The propulsion system is probably the single most neglect­ ed area of yacht design. The conventional triangular "soft" sails, while simple, practical, and traditional, are a long way from being aerodynamically desirable. The aerodynamic driving force of the sails is, of course, just as large and just as important as the hydrodynamic resistance of the hull. Yet, designers will go to great lengths to fair hull lines and tank test hull shapes, while simply drawing a triangle on the plans to define the sails. There is no question in my mind that the application of the wealth of available airfoil technology will yield enormous gains in yacht performance when applied to sail design. Re­ cent years have seen the application of some of this technolo­ gy in the form of wing sails on the lYRU "C" class catamar­ ans. In this paper, I will review some of the aerodynamic re­ quirements of yacht sails which have led to the development of the wing sails. For purposes of discussion, we can divide sail require­ ments into three points of sailing: • Upwind and close reaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Formula 1 Race Car Performance Improvement by Optimization of the Aerodynamic Relationship Between the Front and Rear Wings
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering FORMULA 1 RACE CAR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT BY OPTIMIZATION OF THE AERODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FRONT AND REAR WINGS A Thesis in Aerospace Engineering by Unmukt Rajeev Bhatnagar © 2014 Unmukt Rajeev Bhatnagar Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science December 2014 The thesis of Unmukt R. Bhatnagar was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark D. Maughmer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Thesis Adviser Sven Schmitz Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering George A. Lesieutre Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii Abstract The sport of Formula 1 (F1) has been a proving ground for race fanatics and engineers for more than half a century. With every driver wanting to go faster and beat the previous best time, research and innovation in engineering of the car is really essential. Although higher speeds are the main criterion for determining the Formula 1 car’s aerodynamic setup, post the San Marino Grand Prix of 1994, the engineering research and development has also targeted for driver’s safety. The governing body of Formula 1, i.e. Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) has made significant rule changes since this time, primarily targeting car safety and speed. Aerodynamic performance of a F1 car is currently one of the vital aspects of performance gain, as marginal gains are obtained due to engine and mechanical changes to the car. Thus, it has become the key to success in this sport, resulting in teams spending millions of dollars on research and development in this sector each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Naca Research Memorandum
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930086840 2020-06-17T13:35:35+00:00Z Copy RMA5lll2 NACA RESEARCH MEMORANDUM A FLIGHT EVALUATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL STABILITY CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PITCH-TIP OF A SWEPT-WING AIRPLANE IN MANEUVERING FLIGHT AT TRANSONIC SPEEDS 4'YJ A By Seth B. Anderson and Richard S. Bray Ames Aeronautical Laboratory Moffett Field, Calif. ENGINEERING DPT, CHANCE-VOUGHT AIRuRAf' DALLAS, TEXAS This material contains information hi etenoe toe jeoted States w:thin toe of the espionage laws, Title 18, 15 and ?j4, the transnJssionc e reveLation tnotct: in manner to unauthorized person Is et 05 Lan. NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS WASHINGTON November 27, 1951 NACA RM A51112 INN-1.W, NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS A FLIGHT EVALUATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL STABILITY CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PITCH-UP OF A SWEPT-WING AIPLAI'1E IN MANEUVERING FLIGHT AT TRANSONIC SPEEDS By Seth B. Anderson and Richard S. Bray SUMMARY Flight measurements of the longitudinal stability and control characteristics were made on a swept-wing jet aircraft to determine the origin of the pitch-up encountered in maneuvering flight at transonic speeds. The results showed that the pitch-up. encountered in a wind-up turn at constant Mach number was caused principally by an unstable break in the wing pitching moment with increasing lift. This unstable break in pitching moment, which was associated with flow separation near the wing tips, was not present beyond approximately 0.93 Mach number over the lift range covered in these tests. The pitch-up encountered in a high Mach number dive-recovery maneuver was due chiefly to a reduction in the wing- fuselage stability with decreasing Mach number.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11 Subsonic and Supersonic Aircraft Emissions
    CHAPTER 11 Subsonic and Supersonic Aircraft Emissions Lead Authors: A. Wahner M.A. Geller Co-authors: F. Arnold W.H. Brune D.A. Cariolle A.R. Douglass C. Johnson D.H. Lister J.A. Pyle R. Ramaroson D. Rind F. Rohrer U. Schumann A.M. Thompson CHAPTER 11 SUBSONIC AND SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS Contents SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 11.1 11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 11.3 11.2 AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 11.4 11.2.1 Subsonic Aircraft .................................................................................................................................. 11.5 11.2.2 Supersonic Aircraft ............................................................................................................................... 11.6 11.2.3 Military Aircraft .................................................................................................................................... 11.6 11.2.4 Emissions at Altitude ............................................................................................................................ 11.6 11.2.5 Scenarios and Emissions Data Bases ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Pressure Coefficient Data in Building Energy Simulation and Airflow Network Programs
    PREPRINT: Costola D, Blocken B, Hensen JLM. 2009. Overview of pressure coefficient data in building energy simulation and airflow network programs. Building and Environment. In press. Overview of pressure coefficient data in building energy simulation and airflow network programs D. Cóstola*, B. Blocken, J.L.M. Hensen Building Physics and Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands Abstract Wind pressure coefficients (Cp) are influenced by a wide range of parameters, including building geometry, facade detailing, position on the facade, the degree of exposure/sheltering, wind speed and wind direction. As it is practically impossible to take into account the full complexity of pressure coefficient variation, Building Energy Simulation (BES) and Air Flow Network (AFN) programs generally incorporate it in a simplified way. This paper provides an overview of pressure coefficient data and the extent to which they are currently implemented in BES-AFN programs. A distinction is made between primary sources of Cp data, such as full- scale measurements, reduced-scale measurements in wind tunnels and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, and secondary sources, such as databases and analytical models. The comparison between data from secondary sources implemented in BES-AFN programs shows that the Cp values are quite different depending on the source adopted. The two influencing parameters for which these differences are most pronounced are the position on the facade and the degree of exposure/sheltering. The comparison of Cp data from different sources for sheltered buildings shows the largest differences, and data from different sources even present different trends. The paper concludes that quantification of the uncertainty related to such data sources is required to guide future improvements in Cp implementation in BES-AFN programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Upwind Sail Aerodynamics : a RANS Numerical Investigation Validated with Wind Tunnel Pressure Measurements I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M
    Upwind sail aerodynamics : A RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M. Riotte To cite this version: I.M Viola, Patrick Bot, M. Riotte. Upwind sail aerodynamics : A RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Elsevier, 2012, 39, pp.90-101. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.10.004. hal-01071323 HAL Id: hal-01071323 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01071323 Submitted on 8 Oct 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. I.M. Viola, P. Bot, M. Riotte Upwind Sail Aerodynamics: a RANS numerical investigation validated with wind tunnel pressure measurements International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 39 (2013) 90–101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.10.004 Keywords: sail aerodynamics, CFD, RANS, yacht, laminar separation bubble, viscous drag. Abstract The aerodynamics of a sailing yacht with different sail trims are presented, derived from simulations performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics. A Reynolds-averaged Navier- Stokes approach was used to model sixteen sail trims first tested in a wind tunnel, where the pressure distributions on the sails were measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum X-26
    .. .. 1 NASA TM X-26 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM X-26 DESIGN GUIDE FOR PITCH-UP EVALUATION AND INVESTIGATION AT HIGH SUBSONIC SPEEDS OF POSSIBLE LlMITATIONS DUE TO WING-ASPECT-RATIO VARIATIONS By Kenneth P. Spreemann Langley Research Center Langley Field, Va. Declassified July 11, 1961 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON August 1959 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION . TEKX"NCAL MEMORANDUM x-26 DESIGN GUIDE FOR PITCH-UP EVALUATION AND INVESTIGATION AT HIGH SUBSONIC SPEEDS OF POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS DUE TO WING-ASPECT-RATIO VARIATIONS J By Kenneth P. Spreemann SUMMARY A design guide is suggested as a basis for indicating combinations of airplane design variables for which the possibilities of pitch-up are minimized for tail-behind-wing and tailless airplane configurations. The guide specifies wing plan forms that would be expected to show increased tail-off stability with increasing lift and plan forms that show decreased tail-off stability with increasing lift. Boundaries indicating tail-behind-wing positions that should be considered along with given tail-off characteristics also are suggested. An investigation of one possible limitation of the guide with respect to the effects of wing-aspect-ratio variations on the contribu- tion to stability of a high tail has been made in the Langley high-speed 7- by 10-foot tunnel through a Mach number range from 0.60 to 0.92. The measured pitching-moment characteristics were found to be consistent with those of the design guide through the lift range for aspect ratios from 3.0 to 2.0. However, a configuration with an aspect ratio of 1.55 failed to provide the predicted pitch-up warning characterized by sharply increasing stability at the high lifts following the initial stall before pitching up.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GSSRR.ORG: International Journals: Publishing Research Papers in all Fields International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis Abderrahmane BADIS Electrical and Electronic Communication Engineer from UMBB (Ex.INELEC) Independent Electronics, Aeronautics, Propulsion, Well Logging and Software Design Research Engineer Takerboust, Aghbalou, Bouira 10007, Algeria [email protected] Abstract This paper exposes a simplified preliminary conceptual integrated method to design an aircraft wing in subsonic speeds up to Mach 0.85. The proposed approach is integrated, as it allows an early estimation of main aircraft aerodynamic features, namely the maximum lift-to-drag ratio and the total parasitic drag. First, the influence of the Lift and Load scatterings on the overall performance characteristics of the wing are discussed. It is established that the optimization is achieved by designing a wing geometry that yields elliptical lift and load distributions. Second, the reference trapezoidal wing is considered the base line geometry used to outline the wing shape layout. As such, the main geometrical parameters and governing relations for a trapezoidal wing are
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft of Today. Aerospace Education I
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 068 287 SE 014 551 AUTHOR Sayler, D. S. TITLE Aircraft of Today. Aerospace EducationI. INSTITUTION Air Univ.,, Maxwell AFB, Ala. JuniorReserve Office Training Corps. SPONS AGENCY Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 179p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Instruction; National Defense; *PhysicalSciences; *Resource Materials; Supplementary Textbooks; *Textbooks ABSTRACT This textbook gives a brief idea aboutthe modern aircraft used in defense and forcommercial purposes. Aerospace technology in its present form has developedalong certain basic principles of aerodynamic forces. Differentparts in an airplane have different functions to balance theaircraft in air, provide a thrust, and control the general mechanisms.Profusely illustrated descriptions provide a picture of whatkinds of aircraft are used for cargo, passenger travel, bombing, and supersonicflights. Propulsion principles and descriptions of differentkinds of engines are quite helpful. At the end of each chapter,new terminology is listed. The book is not available on the market andis to be used only in the Air Force ROTC program. (PS) SC AEROSPACE EDUCATION I U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCH) EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN 'IONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU CATION POSITION OR POLICY AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC MR,UNIVERS17/14AXWELL MR FORCEBASE, ALABAMA Aerospace Education I Aircraft of Today D. S. Sayler Academic Publications Division 3825th Support Group (Academic) AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC AIR UNIVERSITY MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 2 1971 Thispublication has been reviewed and approvedby competent personnel of the preparing command in accordance with current directiveson doctrine, policy, essentiality, propriety, and quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CHAPTER 1 Introduction "For some years I have been afflicted with the belief that flight is possible to man." Wilbur Wright, May 13, 1900 1.1 ATMOSPHERIC FLIGHT MECHANICS Atmospheric flight mechanics is a broad heading that encompasses three major disciplines; namely, performance, flight dynamics, and aeroelasticity. In the past each of these subjects was treated independently of the others. However, because of the structural flexibility of modern airplanes, the interplay among the disciplines no longer can be ignored. For example, if the flight loads cause significant structural deformation of the aircraft, one can expect changes in the airplane's aerodynamic and stability characteristics that will influence its performance and dynamic behavior. Airplane performance deals with the determination of performance character- istics such as range, endurance, rate of climb, and takeoff and landing distance as well as flight path optimization. To evaluate these performance characteristics, one normally treats the airplane as a point mass acted on by gravity, lift, drag, and thrust. The accuracy of the performance calculations depends on how accurately the lift, drag, and thrust can be determined. Flight dynamics is concerned with the motion of an airplane due to internally or externally generated disturbances. We particularly are interested in the vehicle's stability and control capabilities. To describe adequately the rigid-body motion of an airplane one needs to consider the complete equations of motion with six degrees of freedom. Again, this will require accurate estimates of the aerodynamic forces and moments acting on the airplane. The final subject included under the heading of atmospheric flight mechanics is aeroelasticity.
    [Show full text]