Living with a Chronic Disease – the Story of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Living with a Chronic Disease – the Story of Ankylosing Spondylitis Living with a Chronic Disease – The Story of Ankylosing Spondylitis Blathín Casey Éadaoin O’Hanlon Máire Curran Michael Costello Stella McGlennon Patricia Pond Preface This booklet aims to provide information on Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is not intended as a stand- alone reference nor is its purpose to provide information on all rheumatological conditions. However, further reading, and links to educational resources are provided to aid your further learning. Contents Table Living with a Chronic Disease - The Story of Ankylosing Spondylitis….……………………..…..1 Section 1 Background to AS…………………………………………………………………………..4 1.1 What is Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)? .......................................................................................... 4 1.2 Pathophysiology .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Prevalence:....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Signs and Symptoms..…………………………………………………………………..…………8 1.5 Clinical Features of AS ................................................................................................................... 9 1.6 Screening and Diagnosis of AS: ................................................................................................... 12 1.7 Differential Diagnosis ................................................................................................................... 14 1.8 Prognosis:....................................................................................................................................... 15 1.9 Comorbidities & Complications in AS patients ......................................................................... 16 1.10 Outcome Measures for Assessment of AS ................................................................................. 25 1.11 Imaging ........................................................................................................................................ 31 1.12 Laboratory Investigations .......................................................................................................... 33 Section 2 Management………...……………………………………………………………………..35 2.1 Medical Management…………………………………………………………….……………...35 2.2 Surgical Management………………………...…………………………………………………44 2.3 The Multidisciplinary Team ........................................................................................................ 53 2.4 Physiotherapy Management in Ankylosing Spondylitis…………………………………...….61 2.4.1 Exercise Prescription in Ankylosing Spondylitis…………………………………………….62 2.4.2 Posture: ....................................................................................................................................... 64 2.4.3 Aerobic Exercise ......................................................................................................................... 65 2.4.4 Strengthening Exercise: ............................................................................................................. 67 2.4.5 Flexibility Exercise ..................................................................................................................... 69 2.4.6 Respiratory Exercises ................................................................................................................ 71 2.4.7 Spa Therapy ............................................................................................................................... 73 2.4.8 Other Exercise Modalities ......................................................................................................... 77 2 Section 3 Considerations For Physiotherapy Management ............................................................ 82 3.1 Fatigue…………………….………………………………………………………………………82 3.2 Flares……………………………………………………………………………………………...86 3.3 Joint Protection…………………………………………………………………………………..88 3.4 Patient Compliance ....................................................................................................................... 91 3.5 Self-Management .......................................................................................................................... 93 3.6 Activities of Daily Living .............................................................................................................. 99 3.7 Driving…………………………………………………………………………………………..102 3.8 Work & Employment in Ankylosing Spondylitis…………………………………………….103 3.9 Sexual Activity ............................................................................................................................. 109 3.10 Relationships…………………………………………………………………………………..112 3.11 Parenting .................................................................................................................................... 113 3.12 Self-Esteem ................................................................................................................................ 115 3.13 Depression .................................................................................................................................. 116 3.14 Impact of Diagnosis...………………………………………………………………………….117 3.15 Service Provision – AS & FM .................................................................................................. 120 3.16 Resources For Physiotherapists And Patients ........................................................................ 123 3.17 Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS)……………………………………………………………. 124 References…………………………………………………………………………………………..132 3 Section 1 Background to AS 1.1 What is Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)? Ankylosing spondylitis is a complex, and systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease mainly affecting the axial skeleton, with the potential to cause severe debilitation (Khan 2003). Fibrosis and ossification of tendon, ligament and capsule insertion at the area of intervertebral and sacroiliac discs are the main characteristics of AS (Hakim and Clunie 2002). 1.2 Pathophysiology The pathophysiology of AS remains largely unknown. Despite developments into the understanding of this area, it is not possible to link them into a unified theory on pathophysiology; however, it is believed AS is influenced by genetic, environmental and immunologic factors (White 2012). It is estimated that approximately 90% of the risk of developing AS is related to genetic makeup. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) B27 and AS show the strongest association of all 4 rheumatic diseases linked to genetic markers (Pham et al 2008). A recent meta-analysis of linkage studies stated that the strongest link occurred with the major histocompatability complex (MHC) region on the short arm of chromosome 6 (Carter et al 2007). Interaction between HLA-B27 and the T-cell response has been cited as a key factor in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (Sieper 2009). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin 1 (IL-1) are thought to play a role in the inflammatory reactions observed with the disease (Gorman 2002). Increased T-cell and macrophage concentrations as well as enhanced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, are characteristic findings. The inflammatory reactions are responsible for distinguishing characteristics of the disease. This includes the enthesis, which is the site of major histologic changes. This begins with a destructive enthesopathy followed by a healing process with new bone formation, linking deeper bone to the ligament and ultimately resulting in bony ankylosis. Typically, vertebral changes begin with an erosive lesion at the anterior annulus fibrosis. The healing process results in increased bone formation, which is initially laid down as cancellous bone, which is then remodeled into mature lamellar bone creating the typical syndesmophytes that are seen on radiography of the spine (White 2012). Research demonstrates there may be a link between AS and a specific bacterial agent Klebsiella, which has an established relationship to HLA-B27. There may be a role for this agent in initiating or maintaining disease activity (Rashid and Ebringer 2007). Glossary of Terms: HLA-B27 (Human Leukocyte antigen- B27): Proteins on the surface of leukocytes and other nucleated cells. These proteins help the body’s immune system to recognise its own cells and to differentiate between its own cells and foreign substances. TNF- α (Tumor Necrosis Factor- alpha): It is a cytokine involved in systemic inflammation. It stimulates and activates the immune system. It can induce inflammation to promote recovery. 5 IL-1 (Interleukin 1): Responsible for the production of inflammation, and for the promotion of fever and sepsis. It plays a central role in the regulation of the immune responses. Klebsiella: Gram negative bacteria which can cause infections. Major Histocompatability Complex (MHC): A cluster of genes located on chromosome 6 concerned with antigen production and critical to the success of transplantation. The MHC includes the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes. Enthesitis Enthesitis involves inflammation of ligaments, tendons and joint capsules at the point of their insertion to the bone. Enthesitis is a principal feature of the spondyloarthropathies and is considered to be a primary clinical feature of AS (Aydin et al 2009). Research has proposed that the primary site of immunopathology is the entheseal fibrocartilage and also the cartilage in general at the interphase with bone (Sieper et al 2002). The Maastricht
Recommended publications
  • Ankylosing Spondylitis
    Page 1 of 4 Ankylosing Spondylitis Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a form of arthritis. It mainly affects the lower back. Other joints and other parts of the body are sometimes affected. Treatment includes regular exercise and anti-inflammatory drugs. The severity of AS varies from mild to severe. It is mild or moderate in most cases. What is ankylosing spondylitis? Spondylitis means inflammation of the spine. Ankylosing is a word that describes bones that tend to join together (fuse) across a joint. In ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the discs and ligaments of the lower spine become inflamed. The discs and ligaments are the strong tissues that connect the spinal bones (vertebrae) together. The joints between the lower spine and the pelvis (the sacro-iliac joints), and the small facet joints between the vertebrae are also commonly affected. Inflammation around the lower spine that persists long-term can cause scarring. This may, over time, cause some of the vertebrae in the spine to fuse together. In some cases, inflammation occurs in other joints and in other parts of the body outside of the spine (detailed below). Who gets ankylosing spondylitis? AS usually develops in teenagers or young adults. It rarely first develops after the age of 40. It is three times more common in men than women. There may be a family history with two or more members of a family being affected. About 1 in 1000 people in the UK have AS. What causes ankylosing spondylitis? The cause of AS is not known. There is a strong genetic (hereditary) part. Something may 'trigger' AS to develop in people who have an inherited tendency to have it.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Spondyloarthropathies: Inflammation in Disguise
    PP.qxd:06/15-2 Ped Perspectives 7/25/08 10:49 AM Page 2 APEDIATRIC Volume 17, Number 2 2008 Juvenile Spondyloarthropathieserspective Inflammation in DisguiseP by Evren Akin, M.D. The spondyloarthropathies are a group of inflammatory conditions that involve the spine (sacroiliitis and spondylitis), joints (asymmetric peripheral Case Study arthropathy) and tendons (enthesopathy). The clinical subsets of spondyloarthropathies constitute a wide spectrum, including: • Ankylosing spondylitis What does spondyloarthropathy • Psoriatic arthritis look like in a child? • Reactive arthritis • Inflammatory bowel disease associated with arthritis A 12-year-old boy is actively involved in sports. • Undifferentiated sacroiliitis When his right toe starts to hurt, overuse injury is Depending on the subtype, extra-articular manifestations might involve the eyes, thought to be the cause. The right toe eventually skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract and heart. The most commonly accepted swells up, and he is referred to a rheumatologist to classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies are from the European evaluate for possible gout. Over the next few Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG). See Table 1. weeks, his right knee begins hurting as well. At the rheumatologist’s office, arthritis of the right second The juvenile spondyloarthropathies — which are the focus of this article — toe and the right knee is noted. Family history is might be defined as any spondyloarthropathy subtype that is diagnosed before remarkable for back stiffness in the father, which is age 17. It should be noted, however, that adult and juvenile spondyloar- reported as “due to sports participation.” thropathies exist on a continuum. In other words, many children diagnosed with a type of juvenile spondyloarthropathy will eventually fulfill criteria for Antinuclear antibody (ANA) and rheumatoid factor adult spondyloarthropathy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheumatology?
    WHAT IS RHEUMATOLOGY? diseases affect nearly 50 million Americans and can cause joint and organ destruction, severe pain, disability and even death. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases with arthritis cause more disability in America than heart disease, cancer or diabetes. How can a Rheumatologist help? Most rheumatologic conditions previously led to severe disability and even death in many patients. Evidence-based medical treatment of rheumatological disorders is currently helping patients with rheumatism lead a near-normal life. Medications such as Methotrexate and Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have had a significant impact on patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), and today patients with RA can lead a pain free and productive life. Rheumatology facts by numbers: • Over 7 million American adults suffer from inflam- matory rheumatic diseases; 1.3 million adults have rheumatoid arthritis; and 161,000 to 322,000 adults have lupus. • 8.4 percent of women will develop a rheumatic dis- heumatology is a rapidly ease during their lifetime. Women are 2 to 3 times R evolving subspecialty in more likely to be diagnosed with RA, and 10 times internal medicine and more likely to develop lupus than men. pediatrics which includes the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and • 5 percent of men in the U.S. will develop a rheu- management of over 100 complex inflammatory and matic disease during their lifetime. connective tissue diseases. Rheumatologists care for a wide • Osteoporosis and low bone mass are currently esti- array of patients – from children to senior citizens, see mated to be a major public health threat for almost diseases like Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus 44 million U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association
    Arthritis Care & Research Vol. 69, No. 8, August 2017, pp 1111–1124 DOI 10.1002/acr.23274 VC 2017, American College of Rheumatology SPECIAL ARTICLE 2017 American College of Rheumatology/ American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty SUSAN M. GOODMAN,1 BRYAN SPRINGER,2 GORDON GUYATT,3 MATTHEW P. ABDEL,4 VINOD DASA,5 MICHAEL GEORGE,6 ORA GEWURZ-SINGER,7 JON T. GILES,8 BEVERLY JOHNSON,9 STEVE LEE,10 LISA A. MANDL,1 MICHAEL A. MONT,11 PETER SCULCO,1 SCOTT SPORER,12 LOUIS STRYKER,13 MARAT TURGUNBAEV,14 BARRY BRAUSE,1 ANTONIA F. CHEN,15 JEREMY GILILLAND,16 MARK GOODMAN,17 ARLENE HURLEY-ROSENBLATT,18 KYRIAKOS KIROU,1 ELENA LOSINA,19 RONALD MacKENZIE,1 KALEB MICHAUD,20 TED MIKULS,21 LINDA RUSSELL,1 22 14 23 17 ALEXANDER SAH, AMY S. MILLER, JASVINDER A. SINGH, AND ADOLPH YATES Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide guidance for particular patterns of practice and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. The ACR considers adherence to the recommendations within this guideline to be volun- tary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote benefi- cial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medi- cal knowledge, technology, and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Report Spinal Gout with Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10(3):5493-5496 www.ijcem.com /ISSN:1940-5901/IJCEM0043949 Case Report Spinal gout with lumbar spondylolisthesis: case report and review of the literature Hui Zhang, Wenhao Zheng, Naifeng Tian, Xiangyang Wang, Yan Lin, Yaosen Wu Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China Received November 9, 2016; Accepted December 30, 2016; Epub March 15, 2017; Published March 30, 2017 Abstract: Gout, a metabolic disorder, is commonly accepted as a peripheral joint disease of the appendicular skel- eton by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals. Gouty involvement of the spinal column is rare. In this paper, we report a case of spinal gout with spondylolisthesis, meanwhile, we review the clinical, radiological features, diagnosis and treatment of spinal gout in literature. The patient was 60-year-old with low back pain. Radiological examinations of the lumbar spine showed L4 spondylolisthesis with bone erosion in facet joints and lamina. The patient was treated by L4/5 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The postoperative histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of spinal gout. Spinal gout is rare and can easily be underestimated. Clinician should keep in mind spinal gout as a differential diagnosis especially in patients with long history of gout and axial symptoms. Keywords: Spine, gout, low back pain, spondylolisthesis, cord compression, computed tomography Introduction treatment with enalapril and indapamide are used to control hypertension. However, there is Gout is a common metabolic disorder which is no effective treatment of gout. characterized by precipitation of urate crystals in joints and soft tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Radiographic Features of Spondylitic Hip Disease J
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.38.4.332 on 1 August 1979. Downloaded from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1979, 38, 332-336 Clinical and radiographic features of spondylitic hip disease J. S. MARKS AND K. HARDINGE From the Rheumatology Unit and the Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, Lancs SUMMARY The clinical and radiographic features of hip disease in 76 patients with definite anky- losing spondylitis have been studied. Symptomatic hip involvement occurred late in the course of the disease, with a mean delay after the onset of 12 years in males and 7 years in females. Patients with disease onset before the age of 20 developed hip symptoms at an earlier stage. Associated diseases included uveitis (13 %), colitis (4 %), and psoriasis (4 %). Bilateral concentric loss of hip joint space with a relatively undeformed femoral head was the commonest radiological change (61 %). Localised loss ofjoint space at the upper pole (16 %) was associated with femoral head destruction and a greater degree of osteophytosis, suggesting coincidental or secondary osteoarthrosis. Bony ankylosis of the hips (10%) was present only in women, and the absence of osteophytes, cysts, and bone lesions of the iliac crests and ischial rami suggests that it is a distinct radiographic manifestation of female ankylosing spondylitis. copyright. Ankylosing spondylitis characteristically affects Clinical details obtained from the medical records the sacroiliac joints and the spine, but peripheral included age at onset of disease, site(s) of initial joint involvement occurs in at least 50% of patients symptoms, age at initial hip symptoms, associated during the course of their disease (Polley and diseases, previous medical and surgical treatment, Slocumb, 1947; Wilkinson and Bywaters, 1958; and details of hip surgery during admission.
    [Show full text]
  • Hallux Valgus
    MedicalContinuing Education Building Your FOOTWEAR PRACTICE Objectives 1) To be able to identify and evaluate the hallux abductovalgus deformity and associated pedal conditions 2) To know the current theory of etiology and pathomechanics of hallux valgus. 3) To know the results of recent Hallux Valgus empirical studies of the manage- ment of hallux valgus. Assessment and 4) To be aware of the role of conservative management, faulty footwear in the develop- ment of hallux valgus deformity. and the role of faulty footwear. 5) To know the pedorthic man- agement of hallux valgus and to be cognizant of the 10 rules for proper shoe fit. 6) To be familiar with all aspects of non-surgical management of hallux valgus and associated de- formities. Welcome to Podiatry Management’s CME Instructional program. Our journal has been approved as a sponsor of Continu- ing Medical Education by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education. You may enroll: 1) on a per issue basis (at $15 per topic) or 2) per year, for the special introductory rate of $99 (you save $51). You may submit the answer sheet, along with the other information requested, via mail, fax, or phone. In the near future, you may be able to submit via the Internet. If you correctly answer seventy (70%) of the questions correctly, you will receive a certificate attesting to your earned credits. You will also receive a record of any incorrectly answered questions. If you score less than 70%, you can retake the test at no additional cost. A list of states currently honoring CPME approved credits is listed on pg.
    [Show full text]
  • New ASAS Criteria for the Diagnosis of Spondyloarthritis: Diagnosing Sacroiliitis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9
    Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es, day 10/02/2016. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited. Radiología. 2014;56(1):7---15 www.elsevier.es/rx UPDATE IN RADIOLOGY New ASAS criteria for the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis: ଝ Diagnosing sacroiliitis by magnetic resonance imaging ∗ M.E. Banegas Illescas , C. López Menéndez, M.L. Rozas Rodríguez, R.M. Fernández Quintero Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain Received 17 January 2013; accepted 10 May 2013 Available online 11 March 2014 KEYWORDS Abstract Radiographic sacroiliitis has been included in the diagnostic criteria for spondy- Sacroiliitis; loarthropathies since the Rome criteria were defined in 1961. However, in the last ten years, Diagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven more sensitive in the evaluation of the sacroiliac Magnetic resonance joints in patients with suspected spondyloarthritis and symptoms of sacroiliitis; MRI has proven imaging; its usefulness not only for diagnosis of this disease, but also for the follow-up of the disease and Axial spondy- response to treatment in these patients. In 2009, The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis inter- loarthropathies national Society (ASAS) developed a new set of criteria for classifying and diagnosing patients with spondyloarthritis; one important development with respect to previous classifications is the inclusion of MRI positive for sacroiliitis as a major diagnostic criterion. This article focuses on the radiologic part of the new classification. We describe and illustrate the different alterations that can be seen on MRI in patients with sacroiliitis, pointing out the limitations of the technique and diagnostic pitfalls.
    [Show full text]
  • Septic Arthritis of the Sternoclavicular Joint
    J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.110196 on 7 November 2012. Downloaded from BRIEF REPORT Septic Arthritis of the Sternoclavicular Joint Jason Womack, MD Septic arthritis is a medical emergency that requires immediate action to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. The sternoclavicular joint may have a more insidious onset than septic arthritis at other sites. A high index of suspicion and judicious use of laboratory and radiologic evaluation can help so- lidify this diagnosis. The sternoclavicular joint is likely to become infected in the immunocompromised patient or the patient who uses intravenous drugs, but sternoclavicular joint arthritis in the former is uncommon. This case series describes the course of 2 immunocompetent patients who were treated conservatively for septic arthritis of the sternoclavicular joint. (J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25: 908–912.) Keywords: Case Reports, Septic Arthritis, Sternoclavicular Joint Case 1 of admission, he continued to complain of left cla- A 50-year-old man presented to his primary care vicular pain, and the course of prednisone failed to physician with a 1-week history of nausea, vomit- provide any pain relief. The patient denied any ing, and diarrhea. His medical history was signifi- current fevers or chills. He was afebrile, and exam- cant for 1 episode of pseudo-gout. He had no ination revealed a swollen and tender left sterno- chronic medical illnesses. He was noted to have a clavicular (SC) joint. The prostate was normal in heart rate of 60 beats per minute and a blood size and texture and was not tender during palpa- pressure of 94/58 mm Hg.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheuma.Stamp Line&Box
    Arthritis Mutilans: A Report from the GRAPPA 2012 Annual Meeting Vinod Chandran, Dafna D. Gladman, Philip S. Helliwell, and Björn Gudbjörnsson ABSTRACT. Arthritis mutilans is often described as the most severe form of psoriatic arthritis. However, a widely agreed on definition of the disease has not been developed. At the 2012 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), members hoped to agree on a definition of arthritis mutilans and thus facilitate clinical and molecular epidemiological research into the disease. Members discussed the clinical features of arthritis mutilans and defini- tions used by researchers to date; reviewed data from the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis study, the Nordic psoriatic arthritis mutilans study, and the results of a premeeting survey; and participated in breakout group discussions. Through this exercise, GRAPPA members developed a broad consensus on the features of arthritis mutilans, which will help us develop a GRAPPA-endorsed definition of arthritis mutilans. (J Rheumatol 2013;40:1419–22; doi:10.3899/ jrheum.130453) Key Indexing Terms: OSTEOLYSIS ANKYLOSIS PENCIL-IN-CUP SUBLUXATION FLAIL JOINT ARTHRITIS MUTILANS Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal gists as a severe destructive form of PsA, a precise disease specifically associated with psoriasis. Moll and definition has not yet been universally accepted. The earliest Wright defined PsA as “psoriasis associated with inflam- definition of arthritis mutilans was provided
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Polyarthritis for the Primary Care Physician
    24 Osteopathic Family Physician (2018) 24 - 31 Osteopathic Family Physician | Volume 10, No. 5 | September / October, 2018 REVIEW ARTICLE Approach to Polyarthritis for the Primary Care Physician Arielle Freilich, DO, PGY2 & Helaine Larsen, DO Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, New York KEYWORDS: Complaints of joint pain are commonly seen in clinical practice. Primary care physicians are frequently the frst practitioners to work up these complaints. Polyarthritis can be seen in a multitude of diseases. It Polyarthritis can be a challenging diagnostic process. In this article, we review the approach to diagnosing polyarthritis Synovitis joint pain in the primary care setting. Starting with history and physical, we outline the defning characteristics of various causes of arthralgia. We discuss the use of certain laboratory studies including Joint Pain sedimentation rate, antinuclear antibody, and rheumatoid factor. Aspiration of synovial fuid is often required for diagnosis, and we discuss the interpretation of possible results. Primary care physicians can Rheumatic Disease initiate the evaluation of polyarthralgia, and this article outlines a diagnostic approach. Rheumatology INTRODUCTION PATIENT HISTORY Polyarticular joint pain is a common complaint seen Although laboratory studies can shed much light on a possible diagnosis, a in primary care practices. The diferential diagnosis detailed history and physical examination remain crucial in the evaluation is extensive, thus making the diagnostic process of polyarticular symptoms. The vast diferential for polyarticular pain can difcult. A comprehensive history and physical exam be greatly narrowed using a thorough history. can help point towards the more likely etiology of the complaint. The physician must frst ensure that there are no symptoms pointing towards a more serious Emergencies diagnosis, which may require urgent management or During the initial evaluation, the physician must frst exclude any life- referral.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History of Ankylosing Spondylitis As Defined by Radiological Progression SINEAD BROPHY, KIRSTEN MACKAY, AHMED AL-SAIDI, GORDON TAYLOR, and ANDREI CALIN
    The Natural History of Ankylosing Spondylitis as Defined by Radiological Progression SINEAD BROPHY, KIRSTEN MACKAY, AHMED AL-SAIDI, GORDON TAYLOR, and ANDREI CALIN ABSTRACT. Objective. Radiological status is an important objective endpoint in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We investigated the disease development of AS using radiological change. Methods. The existing radiographs (n = 2284) of 571 AS patients attending the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases were scored retrospectively using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index. (1) Progression of disease was initially examined cross sectionally. Univariate analysis was used to examine factors associated with joint involvement. (2) Progression of disease was then examined longitudinally for patients with films at time of symptom onset. (3) Rate of progression of radiological change was calculated using longitudinal data of 2 sets of radiographs taken 10 years apart (patient number = 54). The results from this were used to extrapolate backwards to age at first radiological change. Results. (1) Progression to cervical spine disease was a function of: disease duration, severity of hip and lumbar involvement, and a history of iritis (p < 0.001). Lumbar involvement was associated with disease duration, age now, and severity of cervical and hip involvement (p < 0.001). Hip involvement was a marker for cervical disease and associated with disease duration (p < 0.001). (2) Longitudinal analysis revealed marked variation among patients with a slow general rate of progres- sion. (3) The progression of AS over any 10 year period is linear [first 10 years = 30% (SD 0.3) of potential change, 10-20 yrs = 40% (SD 0.3) change, 20–30 yrs = 35% (SD 0.4) change (p = 0.5)].
    [Show full text]