DOCSLIB.ORG

Tony Meadows Associates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tony Meadows Associates Tony Meadows Associates Tony Meadows Associates provides architectural design and technical development services to support the emergence and delivery of transport infrastructure tma tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma Capability Tony Meadows Associates provides architectural design and technical development services to support the emergence and delivery of transport infrastructure. We have been exclusively committed to the design of transport infrastructure since 1986, and are the only architectural design practice with this pedigree. We are based in Central London with ready access to our clients, our sub-consultants, the services we require to operate and the authorities that approve our work. We comprise architects and planners with unparalleled experience in the development of transport infrastructure, with skills in construction planning and design management, and with proven reliability in the transport industry’s approvals processes. We have a long-term relationship with our sub-consultant supply chain and the major engineering companies in the sector, allowing us to rapidly compile and deliver a bespoke multi-disciplinary service to transport infrastructure projects. We are currently rolling out several transport projects as design team leaders and coordinators in the emerging world of Building Information Management, having been at the forefront of computing in design since our inception. tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma Services Design Services Delivery Services Scope Development and Peer Reviews Design Team Appointment & Leadership Design Strategies & Programming Multi-Disciplinary Design Management Feasibility Studies Reference Design and Reviews Multi-Disciplinary Concept Development Project BIM Data Optioneering and Benefits Analysis Detail Design Documentation Building Information Management Environmental Sustainability Risk Assessments & Mitigation Maintenance Strategies Value Engineering Approvals Documentation Operational Strategies & Planning Assurance Management User Simulation Studies Production Documentation Construction Methodologies Scheduling & Specification Project Cost Estimation and Control Construction Programming Sector Compliance & Approvals Construction Tender Support Third Party Consultation Site Support Visualisations & Animations Specialist Sub-Contractor Interface Reporting & Presentation As-Built Data tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma Clients Airports UK London Borough of Islington British Airports Authority London Borough of Lewisham Balfour Beatty London Buses Berkeley Homes London Underground Birse Metro Metronet British Airports Services Limited Mott Macdonald British Rail Network SouthEast Network Rail British Rail Property Board Network SouthEast British Rail Southern Region Railtrack plc British Rail Thameslink Railtrack Property Canary Wharf Group Railtrack Southern Zone Canary Wharf Contractors Regional Railways Centro • West Midlands PTE Scott Wilson Connex South Central South West Trains Cross London Rail Links Strategic Rail Authority Docklands Light Railway Taylor Woodrow Construction East Coast Mainline Tesco Developments/Spenhill Go-Ahead Thameslink 2000 Heathrow Airport Limited Transport for London: Interchanges Kier Group plc Transport for London: London Rail Kings Cross Hub Transport for London: Major Projects London Borough of Greenwich Tube Lines London Borough of Haringey Volker Fitzpatrick tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com ENFIELD New Southgate BARNET Alexandra Palace HARINGEY Turnpike Lane Tottenham Hale WALTHAM Seven Sisters FOREST HACKNEY Dalston ISLINGTON Junction CAMDEN Hackney Angel Euston St Pancras WESTMINSTER Tottenham THE CITY cdd Court KENSINGTON Road & CHELSEA King’s Road Victoria Chelsea Clapham Junction WANDSWORTH MERTON Tooting Broadway Wimbledon tma Crossrail 2 Programme Crossrail 2 (Current, £20Bn) A Mott MacDonald Tony Meadows Associates team is developing The detail of the project is developing from lessons being learned proposals for a new rail scheme crossing beneath London from on the current Crossrail programme. The tunnelling form is similar the South West to North East, with interchange and dispersal at and yet twice as long, and there are twelve underground stations, the main rail termini. compared with Crossrail’s eight. Previously referred to as the Chelsea Hackney Line, the proposed TMA has developed designs for the new stations based on a tunnel alignment now runs from Wimbledon to New Southgate common station layout that includes two platform tunnels with a and Tottemham Hale, with major interchange stations at Clapham central concourse and shafts at each end to house station services. Junction, Victoria, Tottenham Court Road and Euston St Pancras. A layout of a generic station has been prepared and adapted for each station, while the interchange requirements make each The project is being delivered by Transport for London and station unique in its final form. Network Rail, and initially compared two options; a Metro Scheme - similar to the Victoria Line - and a Regional Scheme similar in TMA has recently presented preliminary designs for the stations function to the current Crossrail programme. to all London Boroughs that benefit from the proposal and, with public consultation now underway, the updated safeguarding The Regional Scheme has since been identified as the favoured provisions are about to be presented by the Secretary of State. option, with onward connections employing Network Rail infrastructure and providing main line capacity at Waterloo and Liverpool Street. tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma Crossrail 1 Programme Old Oak Common Depot (2013) Crossrail Outer Stations (Current, £100M) Working as part of the Siemens/Volker Fitzpatrick joint venture Achieving a common look and feel throughout the Crossrail bid team, TMA provided lead design co-ordination for the Crossrail network is fundamental to passengers’ perception of the quality of depot and sidings. service provided by the new service. TMA is developing proposals for Rail for London to ensure the outlying stations are in keeping Canary Wharf (2009, £500M) with the high standard to be set by the new central stations, and TMA were appointed by Canary Wharf to value engineer the CLRL to achieve a strong brand presence throughout. reference design and to develop an architecture that reflects the high quality environment for which Canary Wharf is renowned. The outer stations include Romford, Seven Kings, Forest Gate, Manor Park, Maryland, Brentwood, Gidea Park, Goodmayes, Woolwich (2009, £112M) Hanwell, Harold Wood, Iver, Taplow, West Drayton, Langley, Hayes and Harlington, Burnham, Chadwell Heath, Ilford and Southall. As an adjunct to our work at Canary Wharf, TMA assisted London Borough of Greenwich in persuading the government to include Each station is being appraised to determine the scope of Woolwich station in the hybrid bill submission. We provided enhancements required, from the provision of step-free access, station planning expertise to develop a cost effective solution fully ticket hall enhancements, platform works, new signage and integrated with an over-site development and the private funding secondary revenue. stream this enabled. Bond Street (2004, £220M) TMA and Mott Macdonald value engineered earlier schemes to minimise cost and construction complexity while introducing current best-practice station design and planning. Watford (2004) The potential for Crossrail to link with the main line services at Watford Junction. Working with the rail engineers at Scott Wilson, TMA investigated the required change at each of the stations on route, including the design of a multi-level interchange at Willesden Junction. tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma entrance/exit 0 -7 -20 ground entrance/exit 0 street level ticket hall Camberwell Old Kent Road Old Kent Road -7 entrance/exit -20 entrance/exit 0 ticket hall -7 -20 mezzanine level ticket hall Camberwell interchange street level ticket hall ground @ NR station entrance/exit +7 interchange +7 interchange entrance/exit supermarket/development bus interchange ground @ car park 0 0 -7 -7 New Cross Gate -20 -20 New Cross Gate entran0ce/exit embankment ground entrance/exit 0 -7 -7 Peckham Rye -20 -20 Peckham Rye O&D/development 0 entrance/exit network rail -7 -20 Brockley interchange interchange interchange bus interchange/development ground entrance/exit embankment bus interchange/development entrance/exit 0 0 0 entrance/exit -7 -7 -7 Lewisham -20 -20 -20 Lewisham Lewisham Tony Meadows Associates • BSLC Station Arrangements • 120507 tony meadows associates www.tma.uk.com tma Bakerloo Line Extension In the 1930s powers were granted to extend the Bakerloo line With the omission of Honor Oak Park, the four remaining tunnel south to Camberwell Green. The planned works never came to route options selected for study connected Elephant & Castle fruition and the only use made of these powers was to extend the station with Catford Bridge via the following new Section 12 sidings at Elephant & Castle. stations; Although the plans were revived in the 1950s, no work was carried Route 1 - Old Kent Road : New Cross Gate : Lewisham out on the grounds of cost. Another attempt to revive the plans Route 2 - Camberwell : Peckham Rye : New Cross Gate : Lewisham was made in the 1970s, this time proposing an extension to Peck- Route 3 - Camberwell : Peckham Rye : Brockley : Lewisham ham Rye, but again the proposals were not progressed. Route 4 - Camberwell : Peckham Rye : Brockley The Mott
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • NQ.PA.15. Heritage Assessment – July 2020
    NQ.PA.15 NQ.LBC.03 North Quay Heritage Assessment Peter Stewart Consultancy July 2020 North Quay – Heritage Assessment Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Heritage planning policy and guidance 7 3 The Site and its heritage context 15 4 Assessment of effect of proposals 34 5 Conclusion 41 Appendix 1 Abbreviations 43 July 2020 | 1 North Quay – Heritage Assessment Executive Summary This Heritage Assessment has been prepared in support of the application proposals for the Site, which is located in Canary Wharf, in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets (”LBTH”). The assessment considers the effect of the Proposed Development in the context of heritage legislation and policy on a number of designated heritage assets, all of which are less than 500m from the boundary of the Site. These designated heritage assets have been identified as those which could be potentially affected, in terms of their ‘significance’ as defined in the NPPF, as a result of development on the Site. It should be read in conjunction with the Built Heritage Assessment (“BHA”), which assesses the effect of the Proposed Development on the setting of heritage assets in the wider area, and the Townscape and visual impact assessment (“TVIA”), both within the Environmental Statement Volume II (ref NQ.PA.08 Vol. 2), also prepared by Peter Stewart Consultancy. A section of the grade I listed Dock wall runs below ground through the Site. This aspect of the project is assessed in detail in the Archaeological Desk Based Assessment accompanying the outline planning application and LBC (ref. NQ.PA.26/ NQ.LBC.07) and the Outline Sequence of Works for Banana Wall Listed Building Consent report (ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Zero Carbon Pathway CANARY WHARF GROUP NET ZERO CARBON PATHWAY 2 Foreword
    CANARY WHARF GROUP Net Zero Carbon Pathway CANARY WHARF GROUP NET ZERO CARBON PATHWAY 2 Foreword Our vision is to transform urban spaces into extraordinary environments; creating We must all take responsibility for sustainable places by improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions in order to combat climate change is central to that vision. The climate and climate change and act now to reduce ecological crises are the biggest challenges facing us as we look ahead to the next decade and beyond. our emissions. Only then can we look As a responsible business, we are committed to transitioning to net zero to our children and grandchildren in the support the global decarbonisation effort. This Net Zero Pathway is closely aligned with our corporate values, meaning that every member of our team eye and tell them we have done our duty across Canary Wharf will be able to contribute to this transition in a meaningful to the planet which they will inherit. way through their role. Earlier this year, Canary Wharf Group announced ambitious Science Based – Shobi Khan Targets (SBTs) for reducing our emissions, including a collective emissions target for the Canary Wharf Estate, making us the first commercial district in the world to set a collective SBT. Our Net Zero Pathway will act as a comprehensive roadmap for working with our tenants and suppliers to achieve these targets. The science on emissions is clear; we need to limit global temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. We have been closely paying attention to the science and we’ve developed our net zero strategy in line with the most ambitious emissions reductions pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Environment and You Information Booklet
    THE ENVIRONMENT AND YOU A GREENER FUTURE Not so long ago, the Isle of Dogs looked very different to how it is today. For centuries, it had been a thriving port, importing exotic goods from around the world and exporting the best of British products. But with the introduction of container ships, business moved elsewhere. In 1980, the last dock closed. Left behind was over 20km2 of derelict land, some of it poisoned with toxic chemicals after years of careless misuse. There were few jobs and prospects looked bleak. Things started to change in 1987, with a bold plan to transform the area into a city of the future. The first major building, One Canada Square, was finished in 1991. It’s still Canary Wharf’s tallest building and has been joined by some of the UK’s most environmentally friendly construction projects. It shows that with careful planning, it is possible to create something that is kind to both the people who live and work there, and the environment. This book examines some of the major environmental issues facing the world today – and what you and businesses like Canary Wharf Group can do to help. Remember, we State of the art and thriving: Canary Wharf in 2012 Abandoned docks: Canary Wharf in the early 1980s can all make a difference! P4-7 CONTENTS P16-19 P8-11 P4-7 ENERGY P16-19 TRANSPORT Energy production and use may be Changing the way you travel can make a key contributor to climate change a positive impact on the environment P8-11 WASTE P20-23 BIODIVERSITY Disposing of waste carefully is Welcome the wonder of nature into your vital for a cleaner, greener future world by encouraging wildlife P12-15 WATER P24-25 CONSTRUCTION Even in a country famous for Constructing buildings that are kind to the rain, saving water is important P20-23 environment helps create better workplaces P24-25 P12-15 TO FIND OUT MORE AND HOW YOU CAN HELP, READ ON… 4 2T HETHE ENVIRONMEN ENVIRONMENT ANDT AND YOU YOU TTHEHE ENVIRONMEN ENVIRONMENTT AND AND YOU YOU 33 ENERGY ALERT! CANARY WHARF lectricity keeps the modern world working.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Canary Wharf Elizabeth Line Station and Crossrail Place Oversite Development
    Structural engineering for the Elizabeth line Canary Wharf station and oversite development thestructuralengineer.org Design of Canary Wharf Elizabeth line station and Crossrail Place oversite development Tim Worsfold Michael Bryant John Crack MEng, ACGI, CEng, MICE BSc, CEng, MICE BSc, CEng, MICE, MIStructE, MSM, MBA Associate Director, Arup, London, UK Operations Executive, Canary Wharf Group, Associate Director, Canary Wharf Group, London, UK London, UK Marriott NOTATION Hotel ETFE ethylene tetrafl uoroethylene West India West Quay DLR MEWP mobile elevating work platform North Dock OSD oversite development Station Box Upper Bank Street Bank Upper Docklands Light Railway Light Docklands Bank of America HSBC KPMG Financial Figure 1 Conduct W Overall plan showing proximity of Canary Wharf Authority station to major neighbouring buildings Figure 2 S View from West India Quay station of almost- complete station and retail superstructure, One Canada Square showing proximity of tall offi ce buildings ARUP Introduction Canary Wharf was the fi rst station on the Elizabeth line to be constructed, and the fi rst to be let as a design-and-build contract, with developer Canary Wharf Group. Innovative design and construction techniques enabled the station box to be completed four months ahead of the development programme. Construction of the Crossrail Place retail and leisure oversite development (OSD) proceeded concurrently with that of station. The OSD included a number of features aimed at increasing future fl exibility for the developer and tenants. A timber gridshell roof completes the development, partially covering a large roof garden that is open to the public. The OSD opened in May 2015, nearly four years ahead of the planned station opening.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Sustainability Report
    MEETING THE NEEDS OF A CHANGING WORLD SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2013 CONTENTS 02 Chairman and chief executive officer’s statement 04 About Canary Wharf Group plc 06 Vision and strategy 08 Our stakeholders and key issues 10 Economic development and the community 16 Environment 24 Our people 30 Working collaboratively 34 Performance summary 38 Managing sustainability 41 Independent Assurance Statement ENVIRONMENT p16 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMMUNITY p10 WELCOME Over a quarter of a century ago, the site of Canary Wharf was largely derelict. What had once been part of Britain’s greatest docklands had lost out as shipping technology changed and many associated trades and industries moved elsewhere. But there were new opportunities ahead – for local communities and London’s business sector. At the time Canary Wharf Group (the Group) investigated regenerating the Docklands, there was unprecedented demand for large electronic trading floors and the offices and staff to support them. To help meet this new need, we designed and built Canary Wharf – a project that we hoped would also improve the local environment and create opportunities for neighbouring communities. Twenty-five years on, we continue to: • Plan, design and build sustainable new structures – and improve existing buildings – to create optimal spaces for an increasingly diverse range of tenants, occupiers, shoppers and workers • Manage the existing Estate to continually meet users’ needs efficiently and sustainably • Work with our neighbours to maximise job and business opportunities. We are expanding. Beyond Canary Wharf itself, we are building the iconic 20 Fenchurch Street in the City of London. We have also submitted plans to develop the Shell Centre in Lambeth, as well as a site immediately to the east of Canary Wharf in our home borough of Tower Hamlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Note
    Canary Wharf Finance II plc Issued June 2000/June 2001/February 2002/October 2002/May 2005/April 2007 Class A1 6.455% Fixed Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2033 Class A3 5.952% Fixed Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2037 Class A7 Floating Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2037 Class B 6.800% Fixed Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2033 Class B3 Floating Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2037 Class C2 Floating Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2037 Class D2 Floating Rate First Mortgage Debentures due 2037 QUARTERLY UPDATE Canary Wharf Group updates information on the securitisation quarterly. The enclosed statistics are as at 30/09/17. HIGHLIGHTS Properties 96.9% let at 30 September 2017. Valuations as at 30 June 2017 were £3,278.5 M LMCTV Ratio 45.5% Canary Wharf Finance II plc Recent activity regarding the mortgaged properties On 16th May 2017 a reversionary lease was concluded with Doyle Clayton for 1,066 sq ft on part floor 10, One Canada Square. The lease is for a 5 year term at a rent of £56psf commencing on 1st May 2018. On 22nd June 2017 a reversionary lease was concluded with Bellway Properties for 1,339sq ft on part floor 36, One Canada Square. The lease is for a 3 year term at a rent of £61psf commencing on 19th November 2017. On 6th September 2017 the leases of floors 7, 8 and 9, One Canada Square, let to HSBC, terminated in accordance with the break options exercised on 31st May, 1st June and 2nd June. Elsewhere on the estate, an agreement for lease was concluded with Digital Shadows on 18th October 2017 for 15,509 sq ft on floor 6 , 7 Westferry Circus.
    [Show full text]
  • Men and Women Working Together for Real Change
    Men and women working together for real change June 2017 30% Club . The 30% Club is a global campaign that signs up Chairs and CEOs to take action to create a better balance of men and women at all levels of their organisations as a business imperative rather than a ‘women’s issue’. The Club launched in the UK in 2010 with a target of a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-100 boards by 2015. There are 215 members of the UK Club and the proportion of female FTSE-100 directors has risen from 12.5% to 27%*. As of 2016 the scope of the above target was extended to a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-350 boards by end 2020 (currently at 23.5%*) . In tandem with the above – and in order to ensure that this 30% remains sustainable – we have also established a pipeline target of a minimum of 30% women at senior management level of FTSE-100 companies by 2020 (currently 19.4% at Executive Committee level**). The 30% Club is becoming an international community. It complements and amplifies individual company efforts and existing initiatives through collaboration, sharing of best practice, measurable goals and joined-up actions. The 30% Club does not believe in mandatory quotas. Instead, the 30% Club is aiming for meaningful, sustainable, business- led change, as recommended by the Davies and Hampton-Alexander Reviews. Scarce representation of women at senior levels is a global phenomenon. Local 30% Clubs have been launched in the US, Hong Kong, Ireland, Southern Africa, Australia, Malaysia, Canada, Italy, the GCC and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • North Quay Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary
    NQ.PA.09 North Quay Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary Trium July 2020 Trium Environmental Consulting LLP 68-85 Tabernacle Street London EC2A 4BD +44 (0) 20 3887 7118 [email protected] www.triumenvironmental.co.uk This Environmental Statement (the ‘Report’ has been prepared for the Client by Trium Environmental Consulting LLP with all reasonable skill, care and diligence and in accordance with the Client’s particular and specific instructions. This Report is issued subject to the terms of our Appointment, including our scope of Services, with the Client. This Report has been prepared for, and is intended solely for the use of, the Client alone and accordingly is personal to the Client. The Report should not be disclosed, exhibited or communicated to any third party without our express prior written consent. Trium Environmental Consulting LLP accepts no responsibility whatsoever to any third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is disclosed, exhibited or communicated to, without our express prior written consent. Any such party relies upon the Report at their own risk. Trium Environmental Consulting LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the Services. Trium Environmental Consulting LLP shall be under no obligation to inform any party of any changes or updates in respect of any matter referred to or contained in the Report. This report is the Copyright of Trium Environmental Consulting LLP. Any unauthorised use or reproduction by anyone other than the Client is strictly prohibited. NORTH QUAY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Non-Technical Summary............................
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Bill
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill 1st Special Report of Session 2007–08 Crossrail Bill Volume IV: Evidence Ordered to be printed 19 May 2008 and published 19 August 2008 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 112–IV CONTENTS IN VOLUME II Page List of Proceedings 19 February 2008 Chairman's Opening Address 1 Promoter's Opening Address 3 General presentation by the Promoters on noise and vibration 16 20 February 2008 General presentation by the Promoters on compensation 33 General presentation by the Promoters on ground settlement 46 26 February 2008 Promoters presentation on people with reduced mobility 59 The Petition of the London Borough of Newham 84 27 February 2008 The Petition of the London Borough of Newham 106 28 February 2008 The Petition of the Cyclists' Touring Club 146 3 March 2008 The Petition of Iver Parish Council, the Ramblers Association and the Open Spaces Society 169 4 March 2008 The Petition of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets 195 The Petition of Mr James Middleton 211 5 March 2008 The Petition of Mr David Saunderson 222 10 March 2008 Promoter’s opening remarks on Spitalfields 249 The Petition of Spitalfields Community Association 259 11 March 2008 The Petition of Selina Mifsud and others 273 The Petition of Nicholas Morse and others 294 The Petition of Selina Mifsud and others 296 The Petition of Spitalfields Community Association 312 12 March 2008 The Petition of Spitalfields Community Association 321 The Petition of Spitalfields
    [Show full text]
  • From the Papers
    FROM THE PAPERS Items for the section ‘From the Papers’ (except for ‘The Times’ and London’s ‘Evening Standard’) should be sent to Richard Thorogood at 81 Columbia Road, London, E2 7RG and not to the Editor of this journal. November 2007 MODERN RAILWAYS – LU’s Bakerloo Line serves two distinct roles: on the central London section between Baker Street and Waterloo (the two stations whose ellipsis by Edwardian sketch writers gave the line its name), the Bakerloo acts as an urban people-carrier, shuttling passengers around the metropolis, further out to the northwest, the line has the air of a commuter railway, taking people to work in the morning and back home again in the evening. In central London the Bakerloo manages some of the busiest stations on the network, including Oxford Circus (the fourth busiest, with 53.1 million passenger journeys pa) and Piccadilly Circus (the tenth busiest, 33.7 million passenger journeys pa). With the launch of London Overground on 11 November, the Bakerloo has taken over operating management of the nine stations from Queen’s Park to Harrow & Wealdstone (excepting Willesden Junction). Being the stations facility operator is a new concept for LU. RAILNEWS – Actual work has started on the £5.5 billion Thameslink upgrade, nearly 20 years after the scheme was first proposed. The go-ahead came when rail minister Tom Harris visited Luton Airport Parkway station and symbolically dug into the ground where platforms are to be extended to take 12-car trains. RAILSTAFF – (1) Bombardier transportation has signed a new contract to supply rail signalling equipment for the Delhi Metro.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandatory Recommended Cash Offer Stork Holdings Limited Qatar
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, you are recommended to seek your own personal financial advice immediately from your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser who, if you are taking advice in the United Kingdom, is authorised pursuant to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 or, if you are in a territory outside the United Kingdom, is an appropriately authorised independent financial adviser. This document and any documents incorporated into it by reference should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Form of Acceptance (if you hold Canary Wharf Group Shares in certificated form), which forms part of this document. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your Canary Wharf Group Shares (other than pursuant to the Canary Wharf Group Offer), please send this document and the accompanying reply-paid envelope (for use in the UK only), but not the personalised Form of Acceptance, at once to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker, or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. However, the foregoing documents must not be forwarded or transmitted in or into any Restricted Jurisdiction or in or into any jurisdiction where to do so would constitute a violation of the relevant laws in that jurisdiction. If you have sold or transferred only part of your holding of Canary Wharf Group Shares, you should retain this document and consult the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected.
    [Show full text]