Phoretic and Ectoparasitic Mites (Acari) of the Chrysomelidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phoretic and Ectoparasitic Mites (Acari) of the Chrysomelidae 10 58 Phoretic and ectoparasitic mites (Acari) of the Chrysomelidae 2 JORGE A. SANTIAGO-BLAyl & ALEX FAIN 1 Department ofEntomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-0001, USA 2 Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgiqlle, rue Valltier 29, B-1040 Bruxelles, Belgique Abstract agricultural weeds (Balloch & Mohyuddin, 1969; Mustaque & Balloch, 1979) and in forests (Kleinert, The Heterocoptidae, Canestriniidae, Podapolipidae (Astigmata) 1976; probably an underestimation of insect and mite and Hemisarcoptidae (ProstigIhata) are the mite families most abundance, compare to Erwin, 1983 and May, 1990). commonly reported as chrysomelid associates. Heterocoptids and canestriniids are predominantly commensals on cassidines and We will also point out some of the complexities hispines; they are probably abdominal exudatophagous or fun­ associated with the possible use of acarines as bio­ givorous. Podapolipids and hemisarcoptids have been found para­ logical control agents of leaf beetle pests. Finally, we sitising leaf beetles; their potential as biocontrol agents remains will suggest possible future research avenues on the experimentally undocumented. Apparently, there are no predatory subject. ' acarines specific to chrysomelids. The impact ofmites on leaf beetle populations appears to be limited. Abiotic factors such as tempera­ ture, relative humidity, and biotic factors such as host plant characteristics, ant predation, and insect parasitism are probably 2. Commensalism (Figs. 1-2) more important than acarines in regulating leaf beetle populations. Commensalism is an association between two 6rgan­ 1. Introduction isms in which one obtains an energetic benefit from the relation and the other is not affected. Heterocop­ The Acari (mites, ticks; Cliiggers, and others) and the tid- and canestriniid-chrysomelid relations are the Chrysomelidae, or leaf beetles, are two groups of best known among the commensal associations. major agricultural importance. Both cause losses by Chrysomelid-associated, as well as other perma­ their feeding and have been implicated ~s vectors of nent entomochorous acarines usually have several plant diseases (Fulton et al., 1980; Lapierre, 1980; morphological features associated with their life style. Waterworth et al., 1977). In addition, more than Generally, they have a flattened body, latigradous 30,000 species have been described for each group legs, and reduced chetotaxy. A hypopal deutonymph (Krantz, 1978; Lopatin, 1984) and many more will is absent and all stages of the mite can occur on the become known to science. bettle (OConnor, 1979). The bettles live long enough The literature on the biological associations of to allow the transfer of acarines from one host to these two groups is scarce. Apparently, the Italian another. acarologist Antonio Berlese (1897 in, OConnor, 1982) Heterocoptids may be more common than previ­ was the first to report an acari-chrysomelid associ­ ously suspected. Most of the known hosts of hetero­ ation. Further citations are scattered until recently coptids are chrysomelids. For example, OConnor when some consideration was given to the use of (1979) discovere4 about 60 new species to be placed mites as possible biological control agents of leaf in 15 genera and three subfamilies of the Heterocop­ beetles, such as the Colorado Potato Beetle, Lep~ tidae (Astigmata). tinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Baker & Eickwort, 1975; It is speculated that heterocoptids feed mostly on Eickwort, 1982; OConnor, 1982). the exudates (=exudatophagy) produced in the leaf The purpose of this paper is to review the literature beetle's subelytral space (OConnor, 1982). Other het­ on acari-chrysomelid associations. Most reports on erocoptids feed on fungi (Laboulbeniales), which are mite-chrysomelid associations are limited to only potential parasites of chrysomelids, that can grow mentioning the relationship; Table 1 summarizes on the beetle's tergites. OConnor (1982) suggested these data. Commensal, parasitic, and predatory rela­ that this fungivory might represent a case of mutual­ tions and the potential of the mites as biocontrol ism. agents of leaf beetles will be examined. Competition Aerotocarus is a commensal canestriniid exclusively will not be included as it has not been reported associated with Physonota (Cassidinae) (Summers & among these taxa although several papers report the Schuster, 1979a). However, the impact of these mites coexistence of phytophagous mites and leaf beetles on on the beetles is unknown. P. H. Jolivet, M. L. Cox and E. Petitpierl'e (eds.), Novel aspects ofthe biology ofChrysomelidae, 407-417,1994. © 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 408 -Santiago-Blay and Fain Table 1. Associations of mites (Acari) and chrysomelids Mite taxon and author Host (subfamily) geographic Nature of association Reference distribution of association ORDER MESOSTIGMATA Laelapidae Berlese, 1892 Androlaelaps sp. Diabrotica uirgifera (Galerucinae), egg, larval predator Chiang, 1970 United States Stratiolaelaps sp. Diabrotica longicornis (Galerucinae), egg, larval predator Chiang, 1970 United States Uropodidae Berlese,1917 Uropoda sp. Diabrotica melanocephala predator Thompson and Simmonds, 1965 (Galerucinae), probably South America ORDER PROSTIGMATA Pyemotidae Oudemans, 1937 Pyemotes uentricosus (Newport, Promecotheca caeruleipennis reichii larval (especially 1st Taylor, 1937; Thompson and 1950) (Hispinae), Fiji instar) predator Simmonds, 1965 "Pyemotes uentricosus· Fidia uiticida (Eumolpinaa); egg, larval, pupal, Cross et al., 1975 Promecotheca mesuleipennis teneral adult predator (Hispinae) Pyemotes sp. Chaetocnema ectypa (Alticinae), USA predator Thompson and Simmonds, 1965 Podapolipidae Oudemans, 1931 Chrysomelobia elytrosphaerae Elytrosphaera xanthopyga under elytra Fain,1987d Fain,1987d (Chrysomelinae), Brazil C. labidomerae Eickwort, 1975 Leptinotarsa cacica (Chrysomelinae) adult parasite Drummond et al., 1984 L. decemlineata, Mexico adult parasite (Fig. 5) Eickwort 1982; Drummond et al., 1984; Hsiao, pers. -: :_-<;oinm. to JASB, 1992 L. undecemlineata adult parasite Drummond et al., 1984 Labidomera cliuicollis adult parasite (Fig. 3,4) Bocker and Eickwort, 1975; (Chrysomelinae), North America Eickwort, 1975 (nature and laboratory) C. mahunkai Regenfuss, 1968 Chrysolina (=Chrysomela) graminis adult parasite Regenfuss, 1968 (Chrysomelinae) Trombidiidae Leach, 1815 Teresothrombium susteri Promecotheca atra, P. nemorum parasite Feider, 1956 Feider, 1956 (larvae) (Hispinae) Trombidium holosericeum Leptinotarsa decemlineata parasite Thompson and Simmonds, 1965 (Linnaeus, 1758) (larvae) (Chrysomelinae), France T. parasiticum (DeGeer, 1783) Bromius obscurus (Eumolpinae) parasite <;>,udemans, 1912 (larvae) Trombidium sp. Diabrotica uittata (Galerucinae) protelean parasite Welbourne, 1982 Trombidium spp. Longitarsus paruulus (Alticinae), parasite Thompson and Simmonds, 1965 Ireland unidentified trombidiform Oulema spp. (Criocerinae), Poland egg predator Miczulski, 1973a Anystidae Oudemans, 1902 Anystis baccarum (Linnaeus, Oulema melanopus (Criocerinae), egg predator Borg,1983 1758) Sweden Erythraeidae Oudemans, 1902 Leptus ignotus (Oudemans, Phratora (=Phyllodecta) laticollis parasite Oudemans, 1912 1903) (larvae) (Chrysomelinae) The Netherlands Phoretic and ectoparasitic mites (Acari) of the Chrysomelidae 409 Table 1. (Continued) Mite taxon and author Host (subfamily) geographic Nature of association Reference distribution of association L. japonicus Kawashima, 1956 Chrysolina aurichalcea, Lypesthes parasite Kawashima, 1953 (larvae) fuluus (Eumolpinae), .Japan L. phyllotretae Feider, 1956 Phyllotreta atra, P. nemorum parasite Feider, 1956 (larvae) (Alticinae) L. stolae Haitlinger, 1987 Stolas nudicollis (Cassidinae), Brazil parasite Haitlinger, 1987 (larvae) Momorangia Southcott, Asphaera sp. (Alticinae), Minas parasite Fain and Santiago·B!ay, in 1972, n.sp. (larvae) Gerais, Brazil press (1993) ORDER ASTIGMATA Hemisarcoptidae Oudemans; 1908 Linobia cocclnellae' (Scopoli, Chrysomela populi (Chrysomelinae) hematophagus parasite OConnor, 1982 1763) Acaridae Latreille, 1802 Acarus sp. (the name Promecotheca caeruleipennis reichii predation? Taylor, 1937 Tyroglyphus has been (Hispinae), Fiji rejected) ffistiostomatidae Berlese, 1897 new genus, new species Lema nigripes (Criocerinae), Puerto phoretic commensal Fain and Santiago-B!ay, in (hypopus) Rico (Fig. 1) press (1993) Heterocoptidae Fain, 1966 Heterocoptes tarsii Fa_~~1966 Aspidomorpha santaecrucis fungivorous?, OConnor, 1979, 1982 (Cassidinae) widely distributed; commensal "two genera in the most Brontispa, Plesispa, Anisodera Laboulbeniales OConnor, 1979 primitive subfamily of (Hispinae), Oriental Region fungivores, Heterocoptidae" commensal "derived" subfamily of Dicladispa"i!:xothispa (Hispinae), fungivorous? , OConnor, 1979, 1982 Heterocoptidae Laccoptera, Aspidomorpha, commensal Conchyloctenia, Laccoptera (as Patrisma), Netosacantha (Cassidinae), sub-Saharan, Africa, and Madagascar "third subfamily" of Aspidomorpha, Laccoptera, Metriona, fungivorous?, OConnor, 1979, 1982 Heterocoptidae Thalspida, Thalspidosoma, commensal Basiprionota (Prioptera is a junior synony of Basiprionota) (Cassidinae), Oriental Region Canestriniidae Berlese, 1884 Acrotocarus alutaceus (Turk, Physonota alutacea (Cassidinae), fungivorous or Summers and Schuster, 1979a; 1948) Trinidad exudatophagous Turk,l948 commensal? A. crataepus Summers and Physonota dilata (Cassidinae) fungivorous or Summers and Schuster,
Recommended publications
  • NEW LATE EOCENE CHRYSOMELIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) from BALTIC, ROVNO and DANISH AMBERS by KONSTANTIN S
    [Papers in Palaeontology, Vol. 2, Part 1, 2016, pp. 117–137] NEW LATE EOCENE CHRYSOMELIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) FROM BALTIC, ROVNO AND DANISH AMBERS by KONSTANTIN S. NADEIN1, EVGENY E. PERKOVSKY1 and ALEXEY G. MOSEYKO2 1Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, B. Khmelnitsky 15, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratory of Insect Systematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Typescript received 17 June 2015; accepted in revised form 25 September 2015 Abstract: New fossil taxa of Chrysomelidae are represented by four species of extant ‘Holarctic’ (temper- described: from Baltic amber, Succinispa stainesi Nadein ate) genera in contrast to one species of a Recent ‘tropi- gen. et. sp. nov. (Cassidinae: Oposispini); from Danish cal’ genus. Faunal composition of leaf beetles of late (Scandinavian) amber, Psyllototus viking Nadein sp. nov. Eocene succinites supports the opinion of Archibald and (Galerucinae: Alticini), Calomicroides danicus Nadein Farrell (2003) that arthropods with different climatic pref- gen. et sp. nov. (Galerucinae: Galerucini: Luperina), erences preserved in Baltic amber were able to co-exist Paleomolpus hirtus Nadein gen. et sp. nov. (Eumolpinae: under an extinct equable climate with temperate summers Eumolpini); from Rovno amber (Ukraine, Klesov), Archeal- and mild winters. tica convexa Nadein gen. et sp. nov. (Galerucinae: Alticini), Taphioporus rovnoi Moseyko and Perkovsky sp. nov. Key words: Chrysomelidae, Rovno amber, Danish amber, (Eumolpinae: Euryopini). Leaf beetles in succinites are Baltic amber, palaeoclimate. T HE family Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles) is one of the Baltic amber collection of the Palaeontological Institute of most species-rich groups of phytophagous Coleoptera and the Russian Academy of Sciences (PIN).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Host Records of Some Cassidine Leaf Beetles from Ecuador (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0095 Novel host records of some cassidine leaf beetles from Ecuador (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) Wills Flowers Center for Biological Control Florida A&M University Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA. Caroline S. Chaboo Division of Entomology Natural History Museum and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140 University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 660492811, USA Date of Issue: September 25, 2009 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Wills Flowers and Caroline S. Chaboo Novel host records of some cassidine leaf beetles from Ecuador (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) Insecta Mundi 0095: 18 Published in 2009 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 326141874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any nonmarine arthropod taxon. Manuscripts considered for publication include, but are not limited to, systematic or taxonomic studies, revisions, nomenclatural changes, faunal studies, book reviews, phylo genetic analyses, biological or behavioral studies, etc. Insecta Mundi is widely distributed, and refer- enced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. As of 2007, Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, not as quarterly issues. As manuscripts are completed they are published and given an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are again reviewed by the editorial board to insure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for System- atic Entomology. Managing editor: Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae)
    NOTES ON INDIAN CHRYSOMELINAE BASED ON THE COLLECTION OF THE FOREST RESEARCH Title INSTITUTE, DEHRA DUN (COLEOPTERA : CHRYSOMELIDAE) Author(s) Takizawa, Haruo Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 21, Citation 49-55 Issue Date 1980-07 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9808 Type bulletin (article) File Information 21_p49-55.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 21: 49-55 JULY, 1980 NOTES ON INDIAN CHRYSOMELINAE BASED ON THE COLLECTION OF THE FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRA DUN (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) " By HARUO TAKIZAWA Research Trips for Forest and Agricultural Insects in the Subcontinent of India (Hokkaid6 University, University of Calcutta, and Zoological Survey of India J oint Project) [Grants-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Survey, Ministry of Educa­ tion, Japanese Government, 1978, No. 304108; 1979, No. 404307J, Scientific Report No.7. Abstract TAKIZAWA, H. 1980. Notes on Indian Chrysomelinae based on the collection of the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ins. matsum. n. s. 21: 49-55, 4 figs. Based on undetermined collection of the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, a list of 18 Indian Chrysomelinae is given and a new species is described: Humba cyanicollis, Agrosteomela indica indica, Crosita mellyi, Chrysolina aurata aurata, C. modesta, C. exanthematica, C. inconstans, C. madrasae, C. vishnu, C. brahma n. sp., Agasta formosa, Chrysomela populi, Linaeidea chI01'ina, Plagiodera miniaticollis, P. rufescens, Plagiodera sp., Phaedon assamensis, and Pseudolina indica. Aedeagus is figured for 15 species and hind wing for 9 species. Author's address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cassidinae Beetles of Longnan County (Jiangxi, China): Overview and Community Composition
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e39053 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e39053 Research Article The Cassidinae beetles of Longnan County (Jiangxi, China): overview and community composition Peng Liu‡, Chengqing Liao‡‡, Jiasheng Xu , Charles L. Staines§, Xiaohua Dai ‡,| ‡ Leafminer Group, School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China § Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, United States of America | National Navel-Orange Engineering Research Center, Ganzhou, China Corresponding author: Xiaohua Dai ([email protected]) Academic editor: Flávia Rodrigues Fernandes Received: 13 Aug 2019 | Accepted: 16 Oct 2019 | Published: 18 Oct 2019 Citation: Liu P, Liao C, Xu J, Staines CL, Dai X (2019) The Cassidinae beetles of Longnan County (Jiangxi, China): overview and community composition. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e39053. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e39053 Abstract There are few reports on the community composition and diversity pattern of the Cassidinae species of China. Compared to the neighbouring provinces of Guangdong, Fujian and Zhejiang, the Cassidinae richness in Jiangxi Province is under-reported. Longnan City, a biodiversity hotspot in Jiangxi Province, was chosen to obtain the first overview of the Cassidinae beetles. The sample coverage curves for the three sample sites reached an asymptote which indicated sampling was sufficient for data analysis. A total of eight tribes, 16 genera, 59 species and 1590 individuals of Cassidinae beetles were collected. Most belonged to the tribe Hispini (1121 individuals; 70.5%), followed by the tribe Cassidini (161 individuals; 10.13%) and the tribe Oncocephalini (159 individuals; 10.0%). The remainder (149 individuals) belonged to five tribes (Gonophorini, Basiprionotini, Callispini, Notosacanthini and Aspidimorphini). The tribes Notosacanthini, Aspidimorphini and Oncocephalini were newly recorded for Jiangxi Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Cyprus - a Study Initiated from Social Media
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e61349 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e61349 Research Article First records of the pest leaf beetle Chrysolina (Chrysolinopsis) americana (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Cyprus - a study initiated from social media Michael Hadjiconstantis‡, Christos Zoumides§ ‡ Association for the Protection of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus § Energy, Environment & Water Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus Corresponding author: Michael Hadjiconstantis ([email protected]) Academic editor: Marianna Simões Received: 24 Nov 2020 | Accepted: 22 Jan 2021 | Published: 12 Feb 2021 Citation: Hadjiconstantis M, Zoumides C (2021) First records of the pest leaf beetle Chrysolina (Chrysolinopsis) americana (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Cyprus - a study initiated from social media. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e61349. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e61349 Abstract The leaf beetle Chrysolina (Chrysolinopsis) americana (Linnaeus, 1758), commonly known as the Rosemary beetle, is native to some parts of the Mediterranean region. In the last few decades, it has expanded its distribution to new regions in the North and Eastern Mediterranean basin. Chrysolina americana feeds on plants of the Lamiaceae family, such as Rosmarinus officinalis, Lavandula spp., Salvia spp., Thymus spp. and others. Chrysolina americana is considered a pest, as many of its host plants are of commercial importance and are often used as ornamentals in house gardens and green public spaces. In this work, we report the first occurrence of C. americana in Cyprus and we present its establishment, expansion and distribution across the Island, through recordings for the period 2015 – 2020. The study was initiated from a post on a Facebook group, where the species was noticed in Cyprus for the first time, indicating that social media and citizen science can be particularly helpful in biodiversity research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic and Cytogenetic Relationships Among Subgenera of Chrysolina Motschulsky, 1860 and Oreina Chevrolat, 1837 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae)
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X MEDWIN PUBLISHERS Committed to Create Value for Researchers The Genetic and Cytogenetic Relationships among Subgenera of Chrysolina Motschulsky, 1860 and Oreina Chevrolat, 1837 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) Petitpierre E* Review Article Department of Biology, University of Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain Volume 4 Issue 3 Received Date: May 03, 2021 Eduard Petitpierre, Department of Biology, University of Balearic *Corresponding author: Published Date: May 28, 2021 Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain, Email: [email protected] DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000305 Abstract Molecular phylogenetic analyses mainly based on mtDNA and nuDNA sequences and/or, secondarily, on chromosomes and Chrysolina and 19 of its closely related genus Oreina, belonging phylogeneticplant trophic affiliations,trees showed have monophyly been obtained of Chrysolina-Oreina in 84 species of, with four main clades of subgenera with high support values. to 42 of the 70 described subgeneraChrysolinopsis of the former andand toTaeniochrysea all of the seven, and ones the of second the latter. those Bayesian of Chrysomorpha and Maximum, Euchrysolina likelihood, Melasomoptera and Synerga. The third is much large and composed of three subclades of subgenera, Chrysocrosita and ErythrochrysaThe first clade, Colaphosomaincludes subgenera and Maenadochrysa , and Centoptera, Fasta, the subgenera of Oreina and Timarchoptera. These p plants, at the root of the core of Chrysolina subgenerathree main ofclades Oreina enclose most species with 2n=24(Xy ) male chromosomes and an ancientCh. trophic Timarchoptera affiliation) withhaemochlora Lamiaceae, a ♂ . However, a host shift from Lamiaceae to Asteraceae was detected in all but one and another from Lamiaceae to Apiaceae in Oreina s.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Costa Rica
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 52(1): 77-83, 2004 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu The genera of Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Costa Rica R. Wills Flowers Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA; [email protected] Received 04-III-2003. Corrected 10-I-2004. Accepted 12-II-2004. Abstract: Keys in Spanish and English are given for the genera of Chrysomelinae known from Costa Rica. For each genus, a list of species compiled from collections in the University of Costa Rica, the National Biodiversity Institute, and the entomological literature is presented. The genus Planagetes Chevrolat 1843 is recorded for the first time from Central America, and the genus Leptinotarsa Stål 1858 is synonymized with Stilodes Chevrolat 1843. Key words: Chrysomelinae, keys, Planagetes, Stilodes, Leptinotarsa. Members of the subfamily Chrysomelinae Bechyné for Venezuela. To assist present and –popularly known in Costa Rica as “confites future workers studying this group, a modified con patas” (walking candies)– are among the version of their key for genera known to occur largest and most colorful representatives of the in Costa Rica is presented in English and family Chrysomelidae in Costa Rica. They are Spanish. This is followed by notes on the of broad ecological interest because of their diversity of the individual genera in Costa Rica host plant preferences and varying modes of with a list of both species identified in the col- life. Although readily noticed, there are no lections of the University of Costa Rica and the keys to the Neotropical fauna for identification National Biodiversity Institute (INBio) and of either species or genera, and many taxo- those recorded from Costa Rica in the catalogs nomic problems persist in this subfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(2): 667–707 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.37520/Aemnp.2020.048
    2020 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 60(2): 667–707 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.37520/aemnp.2020.048 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Commented catalogue of Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, with remarks on the collection of Jaro Mráz in the National Museum in Prague Lukáš SEKERKA Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00, Praha – Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. Commented catalogue of Cassidinae species reported from the state of São Paulo, 14th December 2020 Brazil is given. Altogether, 343 species are presently registered from the state representing the Published online: following tribes: Alurnini (5 spp.), Cassidini (84 spp.), Chalepini (85 spp.), Dorynotini (9 spp.), 26th December 2020 Goniocheniini (8 spp.), Hemisphaerotini (2 spp.), Imatidiini (25 spp.), Ischyrosonychini (6 spp.), Mesomphaliini (83 spp.), Omocerini (14 spp.), Sceloenoplini (9 spp.), and Spilophorini (13 spp.). Fifty-two species are recorded for the fi rst time and 19 are removed from the fauna of São Paulo. Each species is provided with a summary of published faunistic records for São Paulo and its general distribution. Dubious or insuffi cient records are critically commented. A list of Cassidi- nae species collected in São Paulo by Jaro Mráz (altogether 145 identifi ed species) is included and supplemented with general information on this material. In addition, two new synonymies are established: Cephaloleia caeruleata Baly, 1875 = C. dilatata Uhmann, 1948, syn. nov.; Stolas lineaticollis (Boheman, 1850) = S. silaceipennis (Boheman, 1862), syn. nov.; and the publication year of the genus Heptatomispa Uhmann, 1940 is corrected to 1932.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Chrysomelidae from CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, Numbers 1-41 October 1979 Through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (Rev
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-41 October 1979 through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (rev. 1)—(2,635 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions and additions are planned and will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. They Adobe Acrobat® 4.0 was used to distill the list into a PDF were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or file, which is searchable using standard search procedures. author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. If you want to add to the literature in this bibliography, Even though great care was taken during the data entering please contact me. All contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata de Gratiana spadicea (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, DuPortei, a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. idae) with a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman 30(1):105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. Museum Collection. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Tortoise Beetles of the State of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)
    Genus Vol. 20(4): 571-614 Wrocław, 28 XII 2009 Tortoise beetles of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) VIVIAN FLINTE1, LECH BOROWIEC2, SAMA DE FREITAS1, JÉSSICA HERZOG VIANA3, FLÁVIA RODRIGUES FERNANDES4, FLÁVIA NOGUEIRA-DE-SÁ5, MARGARETE VALVERDE DE MACEDO1 & RICARDO FERREIRA MONTEIRO1 1 Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-590, CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mail: flinte@ biologia.ufrj.br 2 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, Zoological Institute, University of Wroclaw. Przybyszewskiego 63/77, 51-148 Wroclaw, Poland Zoological Institute, University of Wroclaw. Przybyszewskiego 63/77, 51-148 Wroclaw, Poland 3 Laboratório de Sistemática e Bioecologia de Coleoptera (Insecta), Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Biológicas. Jardim das Américas, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brasil 4 Laboratório de Sistemática, Evolução e Bionomia de Coleoptera, Divisão Científica, Setor de Invertebrados, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. Avenida Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga, CEP 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil 5 Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Agronomia, CEP 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil ABSTRACT. A preliminary list of Cassidinae s. str. is given for the State of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil, presenting 188 species in 44 genera and nine tribes, out of which 35 species are new to the state and three to the country. Data were obtained from literature records and the examination of five national collections. This compilation also presents the records of locality (counties) of each species and is the most comprehensive list published for the State until now.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]