DOCSLIB.ORG

Universal Design in Housing Steve Hansler Maximum Accessible Housing of Ohio (MAHO)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universal Design in Housing Steve Hansler Maximum Accessible Housing of Ohio (MAHO) Virginia Commonwealth University Masthead Logo VCU Scholars Compass Case Studies from Age in Action Virginia Center on Aging 2011 Universal Design in Housing Steve Hansler Maximum Accessible Housing of Ohio (MAHO) Beth Glas Maximum Accessible Housing of Ohio (MAHO) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/vcoa_case Part of the Geriatrics Commons Copyright managed by Virginia Center on Aging. Recommended Citation Hansler, S. & Glas, B. (2011). Universal Design in Housing. Age in Action, 26(2), 1-5. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Center on Aging at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Studies from Age in Action by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Case Study Universal Design in of mobility and self-care limitations in this not-yet-built housing will Housing shows that people had one or both increase the likelihood that people limitations at a rate of 9.65% for will be able to remain in their by Steve Hansler, MSW and ages 60–64, 13.3% for ages 65–74, homes longer and function better as Beth Glas, MNO 25.8% for ages 75–84, and 49.8% they face aging-related disability. for ages 85 and older (NAIC, 1996). What is Universal Design? Educational Objectives It is important to consider the The housing concepts relevant to 1. Show how an aging population implications of these statistics for this discussion are visitability, increases the need for housing that housing and housing design. Smith, accessible design, and universal is accessible and adaptable. Rayer, & Smith (2008), writing in design. All three apply to any type 2. Define visitability, universal the Journal of the American Plan- of housing, although visitability design, and accessible design. ning Association, find that over the focuses primarily on single-family 3. Explain ways to approach uni- course of the lifespan of a new housing. Visitability is a newer con- versal design including key factors. house, there is a 25% chance that it cept emphasizing three elements 4. Illustrate how universal design will have a resident who needs full required for a person with a mobili- can be used in both renovation and accessibility, a 60% chance it will ty disability to visit a home: an new construction. have a resident who needs an adapt- accessible, no-step entry on an able house, and a 93% chance that accessible route; an accessible trav- Background the home will require visitability el path throughout the main level of features. A 2005 study by the the house; and a usable half or full The correlation between aging and Brookings Institution, as reported bathroom on the main level. Acces- disability has been well-document- by The New York Times columnist sible design refers to housing for ed. The U.S. Census Bureau reports David Brooks (January 19, 2006), with people with disabilities and that only 4.1% of Americans aged says that half of the homes in which usually assumes that the person 0–21 and 11.0% of those aged Americans will live in 2030 have uses a wheelchair or other mobility 21–64 had a severe disability, but not been built yet. It is also by 2030 aides; special design features are in the rate soars to 36.9% for those that the aging baby boom genera- place at the time of construction or aged 65 and older (US Census tion is likely to be experiencing renovation. Bureau, 2008). Among older adults, substantial rates of disability. Stud- disability rates continue to increase ies show that the vast majority of Universal design is on the spectrum with age. A study by the National people wish to remain in their of housing concepts between vis- Aging Information Center (NAIC) homes. The use of universal design itability and fully accessible hous- Inside This Issue: VCoA Editorial, 6 Legislative Breakfast Photos, 10 Age Wave Ready, 14 VDA Editorial, 7 VCoA Focus: Cecil Drain, 12 Aging, Obesity, Dollars, 16 Older Blind Grant, 9 Unequal Wealth Distribution, 13 Calendar of Events, 18 ing. Universal design is often mis- least 32 inches wide, 36 inches pre- maximum threshold is ½ inch understood; many erroneously ferred. The design must account for beveled and the entry door should assume it means that everything has a reach range of 18 to 54 inches, the be at least 36 inches wide. to be made accessible, regardless of low and high points a person using difficulty. Adaptive Environments a wheelchair typically can reach. Center, Inc. provides this definition: Any slopes, interior or exterior, “Universal design asks from the shall be no greater than one to 12: outset how to make the design work for one inch of rise, the length of beautifully and seamlessly for as the walkway/ramp needs to be one many people as possible. It seeks to foot (12 inches) long. This ratio is consider the breadth of human easiest to remember as “inches to Grading is the best way to achieve diversity across the lifespan to cre- feet,” thus a nine-inch rise requires an accessible travel path with a ate design solutions that work for a ramp at least nine feet long. minimal slope. If a ramp is neces- all users” (Valerie Fletcher, execu- Slopes greater than one to 20 sary, consider incorporating it into a tive director of Adaptive Environ- require handrails. There are many deck. Finally, automatic door open- ments, Inc., 2002). An academic other important measurements in ers are preferred for those who have definition of universal design, used terms of switches and controls, trouble with opening and closing by design professionals, includes space at doorways, and other items. doors. Lifts are an option, but are Seven Principles as developed by not preferred for the primary entry. the Center for Universal Design at When applying universal design to North Carolina State University. housing, the best approach is “Out- Next, we move inside to look at the They are: Equitable use; Flexible side In.” This approach examines general interior design elements. design; Simple and intuitive use; the design elements, ensuring the This refers to the housing itself, not Perceptible information; Tolerance necessary features are in place, common areas in a multi-family for error; Low physical effort; and beginning from the exterior and setting. Doors should have lever Adequate space for approach, reach continuing into and throughout the handles and be at least 36 inches and comfort. housing. Visualization of how a wide. Halls and openings should be person with a disability would man- at least 36 to 42 inches wide and Universal design makes housing age each part is often helpful. provide easy travel paths that avoid safer and easier for everyone trip hazards. Transitions should be throughout a lifespan, while antici- Let us begin with the exterior smooth with no more than ¼ inch pating and designing for future design elements. The site should be beveled. Consider the users both in needs. Any single home may con- as level as possible and avoid any layout and in materials and prod- tain various universal design ele- major grade changes. An accessible ucts used, e.g., low level carpet ments; there is neither one universal travel path with no steps must con- may be better for a person who design home nor a strict set of rules nect to all necessary amenities, walks with a cane and may slip, to build for. This flexibility is both including parking, sidewalks, while smooth flooring is easier for an opportunity and a challenge. streets, and public facilities like a person in a wheelchair. laundry rooms and building offices. Universal Design’s Key Elements Slopes on the accessible route shall We now get to the most challenging be within the limits previously area: the bathroom; it illustrates the The essential universal design mea- described. The entry to the building distinctions among the three levels surements are: Rooms must include itself should be covered and light- of design. Visitability only requires a 60-inch (five-foot) turning radius ed. The level (no-step) entry is one a usable toilet, which necessitates a for a wheelchair to turn, as well as a of the most important design ele- wide door and adequate space to 30 x 48 inch clear space next to ments and is also a part of visitabil- approach the toilet. Universal items that a person in a chair may ity. There must be adequate room to design and accessible design need to use, such as appliances. All maneuver at the doorway and a require those basics but also a sink doorways and openings must be at place to set down packages. The with a single-lever handle faucet 2 and adequate turning spaces. Both ering all aspects of how a person was conducive to a stair lift and design concepts require blocking in functions in the housing helps Gary is able to transfer from his the walls for grab bars; however, ensure that all elements are includ- wheelchair to the stair lift. accessible design would have the ed, whether one is a design profes- grab bars installed at the outset sional or simply someone wanting The main floor presented several while universal design would have housing to meet needs. challenges. The kitchen is small them installed as needed. Similarly, and, although Gary would not be the sink area would be open under- Case Study #1 cooking, he would need to travel neath in accessible design, while through the kitchen to get to the universal design would simply After a year in a rehabilitation facil- dining area and would need room to make it possible for the sink area to ity following a brain injury, 58- be in the kitchen with Ann when be open underneath with the initial year-old Gary had made significant she cooked.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Curriculum in Art and Design
    Planning Curriculum in Art and Design Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Planning Curriculum in Art and Design Melvin F. Pontious (retired) Fine Arts Consultant Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Tony Evers, PhD, State Superintendent Madison, Wisconsin This publication is available from: Content and Learning Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 125 South Webster Street Madison, WI 53703 608/261-7494 cal.dpi.wi.gov/files/cal/pdf/art.design.guide.pdf © December 2013 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, creed, age, national origin, ancestry, pregnancy, marital status or parental status, sexual orientation, or disability. Foreword Art and design education are part of a comprehensive Pre-K-12 education for all students. The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction continues its efforts to support the skill and knowledge development for our students across the state in all content areas. This guide is meant to support this work as well as foster additional reflection on the instructional framework that will most effectively support students’ learning in art and design through creative practices. This document represents a new direction for art education, identifying a more in-depth review of art and design education. The most substantial change involves the definition of art and design education as the study of visual thinking – including design, visual communications, visual culture, and fine/studio art. The guide provides local, statewide, and national examples in each of these areas to the reader. The overall framework offered suggests practice beyond traditional modes and instead promotes a more constructivist approach to learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ergonomics, Design Universal and Fashion
    Work 41 (2012) 4733-4738 4733 DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0761-4733 IOS Press Ergonomics, design universal and fashion Martins, S. B. Dr.ª and Martins, L. B.Dr.b a State University of Londrina, Department of Design, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid Km. 380 Campus Universitário,86051-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil. [email protected] b Federal University of Pernambuco, Department of Design, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife- PE, Brazil. [email protected] Abstract. People who lie beyond the "standard" model of users often come up against barriers when using fashion products, especially clothing, the design of which ought to give special attention to comfort, security and well-being. The principles of universal design seek to extend the design process for products manufactured in bulk so as to include people who, because of their personal characteristics or physical conditions, are at an extreme end of some dimension of performance, whether this is to do with sight, hearing, reach or manipulation. Ergonomics, a discipline anchored on scientific data, regards human beings as the central focus of its operations and, consequently, offers various forms of support to applying universal design in product development. In this context, this paper sets out a reflection on applying the seven principles of universal design to fashion products and clothing with a view to targeting such principles as recommendations that will guide the early stages of developing these products, and establish strategies for market expansion, thereby increasing the volume of production and reducing prices. Keywords: Ergonomics in fashion, universal design, people with disabilities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • [ENTER NAME of PROJECT] PROJECT CHARTER SMALL to MEDIUM PROJECTS [Enter Date] V1.0
    [ENTER NAME OF PROJECT] PROJECT CHARTER SMALL TO MEDIUM PROJECTS [Enter Date] V1.0 Campus Planning and Facilities Management – Design and Construction 1276 University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1276 541-346-8292 | fax 541-346-6927 cpfm.uoregon.edu/design-construction An equal-opportunity, affirmative-action institution committed to cultural diversity and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………….. 3 Purpose of the Project Charter ………………………………………… 3 2. BASIC PROJECT DELIVERY PROCESS ….……………………………… 4 3. PROJECT OVERVIEW/GOALS ……………………..……………………. 4 4. SCOPE ……………………………………………………………………. 5 4.1 Objectives ………………………………………………………… 5 4.2 Boundaries ……………………………………………………….. 5 5. ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS ……………………………………………… 5 5.1 Assumptions ……………………………………………………... 5 5.2 Risks ……………………………………………………………... 5 5.3 Exclusions ………………………………………………………… 5 6. DURATION ……………………………………………………………….. 5 5.1Timeline …………………………………………………………... 5 7. BUDGET OPINION …………………………………………………... 6 6.1 Funding Source ………………………………………………..... 6 6.2 Estimate ………………………………………………………..... 6 8. CONTRACT METHODOLOY ………………………………………... …… 7 9. PROJECT ORGANIZATION ……………………………………………… 8 10. FUNDING SOURCES ……………………………………………………. 11 11. PROJECT CHARTER APPROVALS…………………………………….. 12 APPENDIX A: KEY ACRONYMS AND TERMS …………………………….. 13 APPENDIX B: REFERENCE MATERIALS …………………………………. 15 APPENDIX C: PROJECT CHARTER CHANGE TRACKING ........................ 16 Page 3 of 20 PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Design in Architectural Education: Who Is Doing It? How Is It Being Done?
    Universal design in architectural education: Who is doing it? How is it being done? 1 1 1 Megan Basnak , Beth Tauke , Sue Weidemann 1IDeA Center, University at Buffalo—State University of New York, Buffalo, NY ABSTRACT: The World Health Organization estimates that over one billion people, or 15% of the world’s population, have some form of disability. As demographics change and the world’s population continues to age, this number is expected to dramatically increase. In response to this global trend, many designers, advocates, and anyone interested in making physical and visual environments more usable for people with diverse backgrounds and abilities have adopted the philosophy known as universal design (UD), inclusive design, or design for all. Despite the demonstrated need for designers who are knowledgeable in UD theory and practice, it seems that architecture programs in U.S. universities have been slow to adequately incorporate UD into their curricula. In an effort to gain a better understanding of the current state of UD content in architecture curricula, researchers distributed an online survey to architectural educators and administrators in 120 U.S. institutions with accredited degree programs. The study, sponsored by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), consisted of qualitative and quantitative questions that sought information related to the understanding, attitudes, and incorporation of UD into each participant’s curriculum. Responses were obtained from 463 participants representing 104 of the 120 surveyed schools. Quantitative analyses found relationships between perceived attitudes of administrators, faculty, and students and the effectiveness of UD components in a program. Qualitative findings were rich and complex, revealing great variability across schools, in terms of how, when (course level), and the degree to which UD aspects were incorporated into programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Environment Development Based on Universal Design Principles
    E3S Web of Conferences 31, 09010 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109010 ICENIS 2017 Urban Environment Development based on Universal Design Principles Bangun IR Harsritanto1,* 1Architecture Department of Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Semarang - Indonesia Abstract. Universal Design is a design which facilitated full range of human diversity. By applying Universal design principles, urban environment can be more functional and more user-friendly for everyone. This study examined five urban streets of South Korea as a country experienced on developing various urban street designs based on universal design. This study aimed to examine and compare the South Korea cases using seven principles of universal design. The research methods of this study are literature study, case study, and site observation. The results of this study are: South Korea cases are good practices, urgency of implementing the direction into local regulations; and change of urban development paradigm. 1 Introduction 2. Site observation was used to inspect South Korea urban streets with evaluation sheet which Urban streetscape which designed and developed in constructed before, and measured by interval scales detail with a special theme or purpose of urban of five points. development. However, not all people can access the 3. Case study was used to explain several phenomena specialized street easily because of their different ability happening on the site observation and later on can (as the elderly, children and people with special needs). be generalized into the bigger scope of research Universal design (also called inclusive design or area. accessible design) refers to facility designs that accommodate the widest range of potential users, including people with mobility and visual disabilities 3 Discussions and other special needs [11].
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering an Undergraduate Innovation Eco-System
    First in Europe - First in Ireland - First in Innovation Engineering an Undergraduate Innovation Eco-System Pictorial Compendium of International & National Innovation Awards Vincent Forde pictured with Sons Sacha, Blaise and Jude Enterprise Ireland Student Entrepreneur Awards Overall Winner and Student Entrepreneur of the Year 2016 Vincent Forde, Gasgon Medical, Cork Institute of Technology CIT Multidisciplinary Teams Win All Five Major Awards at National Finals (1) Enterprise Ireland Overall Winner and Student Entrepreneur of the Year 2016 (2) Cruickshank Intellectual Property Attorneys National Award 2016 (3) Grant Thornton National Award 2016 (4)Intel ICT National Award 2016 (5)Enterprise Ireland Academic Innovation National Award 2016 National Prize-Winners in Engineering Innovation, Design & Entrepreneurship Innovative Product Development Laboratories Recent National student successes include: Three Enterprise Ireland / Invest Northern Ireland Young Entrepreneur of the Year First Place National Awards ( 2016, 2013, 2007 ) Three Enterprise Ireland / Invest Northern Ireland Academic Innovation National Awards ( 2016, 2012, 2009 ) One Accenture Leaders of Tomorrow First Place National Award Accenture HQ Grand Canal Square Dublin ( 2016 ) Five Enterprise Ireland Cruickshank Most Technologically Innovative Project First Place National Awards(2016, 2013, 2009, 2008, 2007) Nine MEETA Asset Management and Maintenance National Awards ( 2016(x2), 2015(x2), 2014, 2013(x2), 2011, 2006 ) One James Dyson Design National Award Ireland ( 2016 )
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Elaine Ostroff Universal Design Papers
    Guide to the Elaine Ostroff Universal Design Papers NMAH.AC.1356 Alison Oswald 2016 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 4 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Personal/Biographical Materials, 1967 - 2008.......................................... 5 Series 2: Subject Files, 1965 - 2008....................................................................... 7 Series 3: Universal Design Education Program Files,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Is Universal Design a Critical Theory?
    Chapter 1 Is Universal Design a Critical Theory? N. D’souza 1.1. Introduction Universal design is a term that was first used in the United States by Ron Mace (1985) although forms of it were quite prevalent in Europe long before. For the purpose of this chapter Universal Design is defined as ‘the design of all products and environments to be usable by people of all ages and abilities to the greatest extent possible (Story, 2001, p.10.3). Universal design in recent years has assumed growing importance as a new paradigm that aims at a holistic approach ranging in scale from product design (Balaram, 2001) to architecture (Mace, 1985), and urban design (Steinfield, 2001) on one hand and systems of media (Goldberg, 2001) and information technology (Brewer, 2001) on the other. Given the popularity, Universal design still remains largely atheoretical i..e. the researchers of Universal design do not explicitly affiliate themselves to any form of theoretical paradigm. One of the reason is perhaps because Universal design is a melting point between cross paradigms. By paradigms I mean basic orientations to theory and research (Newman, 1997, p.62). In this sense Universal design can come under functionalist paradigm (because it caters to utility), pragmatic (because it is instrumental in nature), positivistic (because it strives for universal principles), normative (because it prescribes certain rules) and critical theorist paradigms (because it gives voice to the oppressed). Conventionally the word universal is synonymous to general and refers to a set of principles that are stable, timeless and value free. In this sense universal design could be interpreted as deriving from a positivist paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Diversity Including Disability
    Design Research Society DRS Digital Library DRS Biennial Conference Series DRS2018 - Catalyst Jun 25th, 12:00 AM Responding to Diversity Including Disability René Sørensen Overby Aalborg University Camilla Ryhl Aalborg University Follow this and additional works at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers Citation Sørensen Overby, R., and Ryhl, C. (2018) Responding to Diversity Including Disability, in Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.524 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at DRS Digital Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in DRS Biennial Conference Series by an authorized administrator of DRS Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Responding to Diversity Including Disability SØRENSEN OVERBY René* and RYHL Camilla Aalborg University e-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.21606/drs.2018. 524 This paper constructs a framework for understanding how notions of disability influence the discourse on accessibility and Universal Design as well as the present understanding of the user role in Denmark. Implications are that the understanding of disability and design of architecture are not mutually opposed to one another. Instead they are closely interwoven in the fabric of designing for diversity. Through the perspectives of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Disabled People's Organisations Denmark and the practicing Architects, the paper discusses three notions of disability. Initial findings of the PhD research project “Generating Inclusive Built Environments through User Driven Dialogue in the Architectural Design Process” along with qualitative research conducted at the Danish Building Research Institute frame former and current thinking, and discusses the scope of reviewing impairment as a condition of human variety in the architectural design process.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION a Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build
    Webinar Series Coming Spring/Summer 2018 KEY FACTORS TO ADDRESS WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY IN TRANSPORTATION A Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Table of Contents Introduction . .3 Use of Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) in Transportation Design-Build . .4 Right-of-Way Acquisition in Transportation Design-Build . 11 Utilities Management in Transportation Design-Build . .19 Maintenance of Tra c (MOT) in Transportation Design-Build. 26 Environmental Analysis and Permitting in Transportation Design-Build . 30 2 Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Introduction This publication is a Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive. Vetted through contributions from Owners, designers, contrac- Deeper Dives build on concepts outlined in various other DBIA tors, lawyers and academia, this document is a comprehensive primers. Speci cally, this document builds on the following: guide for owners and design-build teams on some of the most pressing issues in transportation design-build delivery. As with • Design-Build Done Right™ Universally Applicable Best Practices all DBIA documents, broad industry input from diverse perspec- tives helps ensure that our guidance is written to ensure success • Transportation Sector Design-Build Best Practices for all – both owners and practitioners. These documents, and numerous other design-build resources, As the design-build industry continues to evolve, this Deeper Dive are available for download at www.dbia.org. will also evolve, expanding to add new topics or altered content to t industry needs and the current state of practice. DBIA recognizes that there are real-world di erences among design-build market sectors (e.g., transportation, water/waste- DBIA intends to continually update our portfolio of publications, water, federal projects and building facilities), and that issues tools and other resources so that design-build stakeholders will speci c to one sector may not apply in another.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to International Association for Universal Design
    Introduction to International Association for Universal Design V Kunio Tsutatani (Manuscript received October 13, 2004) In Japan, many products incorporating Universal Design (UD) have recently been marketed and successes with such products have been increasing. In December 2002, the International Conference for Universal Design in Japan 2002 was held in Japan, this being the first conference on UD to be held in our country. Based on ideas pro- posed at this conference and the conclusions drawn, the International Association for Universal Design (IAUD) was inaugurated in November 2003. Membership of the IAUD is not limited to manufacturing industries. Its many members span all representative Japanese industries, from the distribution industry to the service industry. The IAUD will not just concern itself with educational programs related to UD and the promotion of UD, it is hoped that it will be an influential proactive organization that addresses complex UD problems that could not be solved by individual companies or industries, through cooperation between industry, government, and academia. This paper describes the history of the establishment of the IAUD, outlines its activities and reports on Designing for the 21st Century III, a recently held international conference on UD. Also, this paper looks at Fujitsu’s involvement in the IAUD, the impact of the IAUD on business and its role in the creation of new business opportunities and gives an outlook for future activities. 1. Introduction projects that cross industry and business bound- There had been tremendous activity in in- aries with the aim of creating attractive products dustry with many attempts being made to apply and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices of Accessible Urban Development
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres, and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which Member States of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the present publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of this review also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of the names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]