DOCSLIB.ORG

Research and Design of a Two-Stage Supersonic Rocket

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research and Design of a Two-Stage Supersonic Rocket The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Spring 2020 Research and Design of a Two-Stage Supersonic Rocket Ryan Hannaford [email protected] James Gase [email protected] Matthew Reppa [email protected] Harrison Lewis [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Aeronautical Vehicles Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Hannaford, Ryan; Gase, James; Reppa, Matthew; and Lewis, Harrison, "Research and Design of a Two-Stage Supersonic Rocket" (2020). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 1222. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1222 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Project BOGO: Research and Design of a Two- Stage Supersonic Rocket ME Senior Design/Honors Project 4600:497-001 Group 59 Group Members: Matthew Reppa Harrison Lewis James Gase Ryan Hannaford Page 1 This report documents the design process for a supersonic two-stage rocket and highlights the team’s research, design, testing, and construction of key elements of the rocket. Most major systems of the launch vehicle, including motors, electronics systems, interior and exterior structures, and recovery, will be analyzed and assessed during the design process. The launch vehicle is set was intended to compete at the 2020 Spaceport America Cup in Las Cruces, New Mexico prior to the shutdown of the competition due to the COVID-19 epidemic. Undergoing this project allowed the team members to further develop the skills learned throughout the Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Systems Engineering curriculums at the University of Akron. Additionally, the findings of this report will provide a basis for future innovation within the University of Akron’s Akronauts Rocket Design Team. Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract .............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Background.................................................................................................................. 7 2.2. Spaceport America Cup ............................................................................................... 8 2.3. Requirements .............................................................................................................. 8 2.3.1. University of Akron ME Department Requirements ............................................... 8 2.3.2. University of Akron Honors College Requirements ............................................... 8 2.3.3. Experimental Sounding Rocket Association Requirements ................................... 9 2.3.4. Team Derivation Requirements ............................................................................ 9 2.4. Objectives ...................................................................................................................12 2.5. Solution .......................................................................................................................12 2.6. Reasoning ..................................................................................................................13 3. Structural Design ...............................................................................................................16 3.1. Nose Cone Design ......................................................................................................16 3.1.1. Nose Cone Shape ...............................................................................................16 3.1.2. Fineness Ratio .....................................................................................................18 3.1.3. Manufacturability ..................................................................................................18 3.1.4. Simulation Analysis ..............................................................................................20 3.1.5. Nose Cone Temperature Calculations .................................................................21 3.2. Fin Design ..................................................................................................................21 3.2.1. Number of Fins ....................................................................................................22 3.2.2. Leading-Edge Design ..........................................................................................23 3.2.3. Trailing-Edge Design ...........................................................................................25 3.2.4. Airfoil Manufacturing ............................................................................................28 3.2.5. Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis ................................................................29 3.2.6. Final Fin Design ...................................................................................................37 3.2.7. Flutter Analysis ....................................................................................................37 3.2.8. Modal Analysis .....................................................................................................39 3.3. Fin Retention ..............................................................................................................41 3.3.1. Design Factors .....................................................................................................41 Page 3 3.3.2. Printed Canister ...................................................................................................49 3.3.3. External Fin Retainer ...........................................................................................51 3.3.4. Internal Hardware Retainer ..................................................................................52 3.3.5. Tapered Inserts ....................................................................................................53 3.3.6. Tangential Screw Alignment ................................................................................54 3.3.7. Final Design .........................................................................................................55 3.4. Bulkheads & Centering Rings .....................................................................................56 3.5. Motor Retention ..........................................................................................................57 3.5.1. Retention Options ................................................................................................58 3.5.2. Thread Engagement ............................................................................................59 3.5.3. Krushnic Effect .....................................................................................................61 3.6. Rail buttons .................................................................................................................63 3.6.1. Rail Button Placement .........................................................................................63 3.6.2. Rail Button Attachment ........................................................................................64 4. Rocket Staging Techniques ...............................................................................................66 4.1. Rocket Layout .............................................................................................................66 4.2. Stage Separation ........................................................................................................66 4.2.1. Constant vs Varying Diameter .............................................................................66 4.2.2. Passive vs Forced Separation .............................................................................68 4.2.3. Potential Fin Attachment Issues ...........................................................................70 4.3. Motor Selection ...........................................................................................................71 4.4. Sustainer Separation & Ignition Timing .......................................................................73 4.4.1. Altitude and Velocity Analysis ..............................................................................74 4.4.2. Vertical Orientation Analysis ................................................................................77 4.4.3. Drift Analysis ........................................................................................................80 4.5. Max Dynamic Force Calculations ................................................................................83 4.6. Parachute Deployment Methods and Layouts .............................................................84 4.6.1. Tender Descender ...............................................................................................85
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Douglas Missile & Space Systems Division
    ·, THE THOR HISTORY. MAY 1963 DOUGLAS REPORT SM-41860 APPROVED BY: W.H.. HOOPER CHIEF, THOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOUGLAS MISSILE & SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION ABSTRACT This history is intended as a quick orientation source and as n ready-reference for review of the Thor and its sys­ tems. The report briefly states the development of Thor, sur'lli-:arizes and chronicles Thor missile and booster launch­ inGs, provides illustrations and descriptions of the vehicle systcn1s, relates their genealogy, explains sane of the per­ fon:iance capabilities of the Thor and Thor-based vehicles used, and focuses attention to the exploration of space by Douelas Aircraf't Company, Inc. (DAC). iii PREFACE The purpose of The Thor History is to survey the launch record of the Thor Weapon, Special Weapon, and Space Systems; give a systematic account of the major events; and review Thor's participation in the military and space programs of this nation. The period covered is from December 27, 1955, the date of the first contract award, through May, 1963. V �LE OF CONTENTS Page Contract'Award . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l Basic Or�anization and Objectives • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Basic Developmenta� Philosophy . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 Early Research and Development Launches • • • ·• • • • • • • • • • 4 Transition to ICBM with Space Capabilities--Multi-Stage Vehicles . 6 Initial Lunar and Space Probes ••••••• • • • • • • •
    [Show full text]
  • The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- a Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch
    The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- A Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch J. F. LeBar1 and E. C. Cady2 Boeing Phantom Works, Huntington Beach CA 92647 Space exploration top-level objectives have been defined with the United States first returning to the moon as a precursor to missions to Mars and beyond. System architecture studies are being conducted to develop the overall approach and define requirements for the various system elements, both Earth-to-orbit and in-space. One way of minimizing cost and risk is through the use of proven systems and/or multiple-use elements. Use of a Delta IV second stage derivative as a long duration in-space transportation stage offers cost, reliability, and performance advantages over earth-storable propellants and/or all new stages. The Delta IV second stage mission currently is measured in hours, and the various vehicle and propellant systems have been designed for these durations. In order for the ACES to have sufficient life to be useful as an Earth Departure Stage (EDS), many systems must be modified for long duration missions. One of the highest risk subsystems is the propellant storage Thermal Control System (TCS). The ACES effort concentrated on a lower risk passive TCS, the RL10 engine, and the other subsystems. An active TCS incorporating a cryocoolers was also studied. In addition, a number of computational models were developed to aid in the subsystem studies. The high performance TCS developed under ACES was simulated within the Delta IV thermal model and long-duration mission stage performance assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • ULA Rideshare Capabilities for Providing Low-Cost Access to Space
    United Launch Alliance Rideshare Capabilities for Providing Low-Cost Access to Space Keith Karuntzos United Launch Alliance PO Box 3788, MIS C4102 Centennial, CO 80155-3788 303-269-5499 [email protected] Abstract-United Launch Alliance (ULA) has a long history of REFERENCES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 providing launch services to high-value payloads for a variety BIOGRAPHY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 of customers, including the US Department of Defense, the National Reconnaissance Office, NASA, and commercial customers. These missions have deployed a wide variety of capabilities into Earth orbit and beyond, such as navigation, 1. VVHAT IS RIDESHARE? communication, R&D, observation, and science, all which have Since the dawn of the space age, spacecraft have often provided us with a tremendous amount of knowledge about Earth and our solar system. The majority of these spacecraft shared launch services with one another while being has been launched as primary payloads, and used the full delivered into space. This approach has normally been done capability of the launch vehicle; yet there is a lower-cost to support spacecraftmuch smaller than the primary payload alternative for achieving similar mission objectives: rideshare. it is launching with. By designing launch services in this manner, spacecraft operators were able to deliver more Rideshare is the approach of sharing available launch vehicle payloads to orbit for a fraction of the cost of a full-up launch performance and volume margins with two or more spacecraft service. that would otherwise go underutilized by the spacecraft community. This allows spacecraft customers the opportunity This method of launching multiple payloads into orbit on a to get their spacecraft to orbit and beyond in an inexpensive single launch vehicle is called rideshare.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity and Space
    10/17/2012!! !!!!!! Project Number: MH-1207 Humanity and Space An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: Matthew Beck Jillian Chalke Matthew Chase Julia Rugo Professor Mayer H. Humi, Project Advisor Abstract Our IQP investigates the possible functionality of another celestial body as an alternate home for mankind. This project explores the necessary technological advances for moving forward into the future of space travel and human development on the Moon and Mars. Mars is the optimal candidate for future human colonization and a stepping stone towards humanity’s expansion into outer space. Our group concluded space travel and interplanetary exploration is possible, however international political cooperation and stability is necessary for such accomplishments. 2 Executive Summary This report provides insight into extraterrestrial exploration and colonization with regards to technology and human biology. Multiple locations have been taken into consideration for potential development, with such qualifying specifications as resources, atmospheric conditions, hazards, and the environment. Methods of analysis include essential research through online media and library resources, an interview with NASA about the upcoming Curiosity mission to Mars, and the assessment of data through mathematical equations. Our findings concerning the human aspect of space exploration state that humanity is not yet ready politically and will not be able to biologically withstand the hazards of long-term space travel. Additionally, in the field of robotics, we have the necessary hardware to implement adequate operational systems yet humanity lacks the software to implement rudimentary Artificial Intelligence. Findings regarding the physics behind rocketry and space navigation have revealed that the science of spacecraft is well-established.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Surface Roughness on the Transient Point of a Blunt Nose Cone
    Investigation of Surface Roughness on the Transient Point of a Blunt Nose Cone A Project Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment to the Requirements of the Degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering By Terrence Soares Approved by Dr. Periklis E. Papadopoulos Faculty Advisor ©May 2020 Table of Contents Table of contents i List of figures iii List of tables iv Abstract v Nomenclature v Symbols vi Greek symbols vi Subscripts vi Acronyms vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Literature 1 1.2.1 Additive manufacturing 1 1.2.2 Surface roughness 5 1.2.3 Blunt nose cone angle 6 1.2.4 Boundary layer transitions 9 1.2.5 Shock wave - oblique v expansion 10 1.2.6 Turbulent heating 12 1.3 Project proposal 13 1.4 Methodology 13 2. Experimental tools and methods 17 2.1 Blunt cone designs 17 2.2 3D Models 21 2.3 Simulations 22 2.3.1 Enclosure 22 2.3.2 Mesh 24 2.3.3 Setup 26 3. Results 28 3.1 Reda results 28 3.2 ANSYS results 28 3.2.1 Cone angle 30 degrees 28 3.2.2 Cone angle 45 degrees 30 3.2.3 Cone angle 60 degrees 32 4. Discussion 35 4.1 Reda vs base model CFD 35 4.2 CFD nose cone comparison 35 i 4.2.1 Surface roughness 35 4.2.2 Nose cone angle 36 4.2.3 Transient point 37 5. Conclusion 38 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future J. K. Ganoung Manager Spacecraft Integration, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. H. Eaton Delta Launch Program, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ganoung, J. K. and Eaton, H., "The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA LAUNCH VEHICLE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE J. K. Ganoung, Manager H. Eaton, Jr., Director Spacecraft Integration Delta Launch Program McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. INTRODUCTION an "interim space launch vehicle." The THOR was to be modified for use as the first stage, the The Delta launch vehicle is a medium class Vanguard second stage propulsion system, was used expendable booster managed by the NASA Goddard as the Delta second stage and the Vanguard solid Space Flight Center and used by the U.S. rocket motor became Delta's third stage. Government, private industry and foreign coun­ Following the eighteen month development program tries to launch scientific, meteorological, and failure to launch its first payload into or­ applications and communications satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tool for Preliminary Design of Rockets Aerospace Engineering
    A Tool for Preliminary Design of Rockets Diogo Marques Gaspar Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering Supervisor : Professor Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Examination Committee Chairperson: Professor Fernando José Parracho Lau Supervisor: Professor Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Members of the Committee: Professor João Manuel Gonçalves de Sousa Oliveira July 2014 ii Dedicated to my Mother iii iv Acknowledgments To my supervisor Professor Paulo Gil for the opportunity to work on this interesting subject and for all his support and patience. To my family, in particular to my parents and brothers for all the support and affection since ever. To my friends: from IST for all the companionship in all this years and from Coimbra for the fellowship since I remember. To my teammates for all the victories and good moments. v vi Resumo A unica´ forma que a humanidade ate´ agora conseguiu encontrar para explorar o espac¸o e´ atraves´ do uso de rockets, vulgarmente conhecidos como foguetoes,˜ responsaveis´ por transportar cargas da Terra para o Espac¸o. O principal objectivo no design de rockets e´ diminuir o peso na descolagem e maximizar o payload ratio i.e. aumentar a capacidade de carga util´ ao seu alcance. A latitude e o local de lanc¸amento, a orbita´ desejada, as caracter´ısticas de propulsao˜ e estruturais sao˜ constrangimentos ao projecto do foguetao.˜ As trajectorias´ dos foguetoes˜ estao˜ permanentemente a ser optimizadas, devido a necessidade de aumento da carga util´ transportada e reduc¸ao˜ do combust´ıvel consumido. E´ um processo utilizado nas fases iniciais do design de uma missao,˜ que afecta partes cruciais do planeamento, desde a concepc¸ao˜ do ve´ıculo ate´ aos seus objectivos globais.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Vehicle Optimization
    Launch vehicle optimization 1.Orbital Mechanics for engineering students Chapter – 11: Rocket vehicle dynamics 2. Space Flight Dynamics By William E Wiesel Chapter 7 – Rocket Performance Restricted staging in field-free space No gravity and no aerodynamics Let gross mass of a launch vehicle m0 = empty mass mE + propellant mass mp + payload mass mPL Empty mass mE = mass of structure + mass of fuel tank and related system + mass of control system Let us divide the above by m0 We can write as structural fraction , πE = mE / m0 Propellant fraction, πp =mp / m0 payload fraction, πPL = mPL / m0 Alternately we can define Payload ratio Structural ratio Mass ratio Assuming all the propellant Is consumed λ, ε and n are not independent From we can write as From we can write as Substituting and in We get Given any two of the ratios λ, ε and n, we can obtain the third Velocity at burn out is For a given empty mass, the greatest possible Δv occurs when the payload is zero. To maximize the amount of payload while keeping the structural weight to a minimum. Mass of load-bearing structure, rocket motors, pumps, piping, etc., cannot be made arbitrarily small. Current materials technology places a lower limit on ε of about 0.1. Performance of multistage rocket Restricted staging - all stages are similar Each stage has the same specific impulse Isp same structural ratio ε same payload ratio λ. Hence mass ratios n are identical Final burnout speed vbo for a given payload mass mPL Overall payload fraction m0 is the total mass of the tandem-stacked vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolved Expendable Launch Operations at Cape Canaveral, 2002-2009
    EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH OPERATIONS AT CAPE CANAVERAL 2002 – 2009 by Mark C. Cleary 45th SPACE WING History Office PREFACE This study addresses ATLAS V and DELTA IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) operations at Cape Canaveral, Florida. It features all the EELV missions launched from the Cape through the end of Calendar Year (CY) 2009. In addition, the first chapter provides an overview of the EELV effort in the 1990s, summaries of EELV contracts and requests for facilities at Cape Canaveral, deactivation and/or reconstruction of launch complexes 37 and 41 to support EELV operations, typical EELV flight profiles, and military supervision of EELV space operations. The lion’s share of this work highlights EELV launch campaigns and the outcome of each flight through the end of 2009. To avoid confusion, ATLAS V missions are presented in Chapter II, and DELTA IV missions appear in Chapter III. Furthermore, missions are placed in three categories within each chapter: 1) commercial, 2) civilian agency, and 3) military space operations. All EELV customers employ commercial launch contractors to put their respective payloads into orbit. Consequently, the type of agency sponsoring a payload (the Air Force, NASA, NOAA or a commercial satellite company) determines where its mission summary is placed. Range officials mark all launch times in Greenwich Mean Time, as indicated by a “Z” at various points in the narrative. Unfortunately, the convention creates a one-day discrepancy between the local date reported by the media and the “Z” time’s date whenever the launch occurs late at night, but before midnight. (This proved true for seven of the military ATLAS V and DELTA IV missions presented here.) In any event, competent authorities have reviewed all the material presented in this study, and it is releasable to the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Stage, High-Altitude Rocket with Internal Skeleton Design Entered in Advance Category of 7Th ESRA IREC
    Two-Stage, High-Altitude Rocket with Internal Skeleton Design Entered in Advance Category of 7th ESRA IREC Samuel S. Bowman1, Kevin J. Byrne2, Allen Capatina3, Aliki S. Loper-Leddy4, and Joshua A. Van Schoyck5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407 A high-altitude, two-stage rocket was designed, built, and entered in the advanced category of the 7th Annual Experimental Sounding Rocket Association (ESRA) Intercollegiate Rocketry Engineering Competition (IREC). The rocket, called AJAKS, featured an internal skeleton made of carbon fiber rods, and a combination of plywood, carbon, and aluminum bulkheads. Loads were driven through the internal structure, with an outer skin tube providing an aerodynamic surface. A unique separation device was developed to ensure proper stage separation. The competition required the rocket to carry a 10-lb payload, which was chosen by the team to consist of an IMU and data logging computer for recording the descent profile, a CubeSat test unit, and a digital video recorder. Prior to the competition launch, AJAKS was test launched on May 5th in the Mojave at the Friends of Amateur Rocketry (FAR) launch facility. During the test launch AJAKS suffered a PIRM malfunction and the main parachute did not deploy. Following the test launch, the second stage of the rocket was rebuilt with a stronger payload configuration. The ESRA IREC was held on June 21st to the 24th. AJAKS was launched on the 23rd and during ascent the second stage became unstable and reached an altitude of only 6,000 ft. Both stages suffered damage upon landing. Nomenclature A = reference area (inches2) CNα = normal force coefficient (unitless) cp = center of pressure location relative to nosecone tip (inches) E = elastic modulus (psi) I = area moment of inertia (inches2) L = length of the rocket (inches) Pcr = critical load for buckling (pounds) Subscripts b = first stage s = second stage total = first and second stage I.
    [Show full text]
  • Into the Unknown Together the DOD, NASA, and Early Spaceflight
    Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page i Into the Unknown Together The DOD, NASA, and Early Spaceflight MARK ERICKSON Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 2005 Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page ii Air University Library Cataloging Data Erickson, Mark, 1962- Into the unknown together : the DOD, NASA and early spaceflight / Mark Erick- son. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-140-6 1. Manned space flight—Government policy—United States—History. 2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration—History. 3. Astronautics, Military—Govern- ment policy—United States. 4. United States. Air Force—History. 5. United States. Dept. of Defense—History. I. Title. 629.45'009'73––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the editor and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public re- lease: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page iii To Becky, Anna, and Jessica You make it all worthwhile. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page v Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . ix 1 NECESSARY PRECONDITIONS . 1 Ambling toward Sputnik . 3 NASA’s Predecessor Organization and the DOD . 18 Notes . 24 2 EISENHOWER ACT I: REACTION TO SPUTNIK AND THE BIRTH OF NASA . 31 Eisenhower Attempts to Calm the Nation .
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T
    I S S U E 8 7 - A U G U S T 1 9 , 2 0 0 2 NEWSLETTER Feature Plan: How To Make Your Own Custom Foam Nose Cones Delta III Rocket Hit: AddAdd aa PiecePiece ofof SpaceSpace HistoryHistory ToTo YourYour RocketRocket FleetFleet Web Sites of the Week: How Do You View Old Rocketry Web Sites That Say "File Not Found?" ApogeeApogee News:News: UpdatedUpdated ProductProduct CatalogCatalog IsIs ComingComing SoonSoon NewNew RockSimRockSim User'sUser's ManualManual NowNow AvailableAvailable HowHow ToTo SelectSelect FromFrom AmongAmong OurOur SoftwareSoftware Choices?Choices? RocketRocket MotorMotor Update:Update: WhenWhen WillWill TheThe MedalistMedalist MotorsMotors BeBe BackBack InIn Stock?Stock? PlusPlus ProductProduct ReviewsReviews andand WebWeb SiteSite CorrectionsCorrections 11301 1 3 0 EElkton l k t o n Drive D r i v, e Suite s u i t A A ColoradoC o l o r a d o Springs S p r i n ,g sCO , C 80907 O 8 0 9 0 USA7 wwww w w .. ApogeeRocketsa p o g e e r o c k e t. scom . c o m orderso r d e r @@ApogeeRockets a p o g e e r o c k e t. coms . c o m phonePhone 771919-535-9335-535-9335 Fax 7 fax19-534-9050 719-534-9050 I S S U E 8 7 - A U G U S T 1 9 , 2 0 0 2 APOGEEAPOGEE PEAK OF FlIGHT Future Classic Kit: Add A Piece of Space History to Your Rocket Fleet No collection of scale model model kits is complete with- out the Apogee Delta III kit.
    [Show full text]