Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 24

1 Randall E. Kay (State Bar No. 149369) [email protected] 2 JONES DAY 4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 3 San Diego, CA 92121.3134 Telephone: +1.858.314.1200 4 Facsimile: +1.844.345.3178 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.

12 Plaintiff, MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT 13 v. (1) Defend Trade Secrets Act 14 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS (2) Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) CORPORATION, FUJIAN JINHUA (3) Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) 15 INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CO., LTD., and (4) California Uniform Trade Secrets Act DOES 1-10, 16 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants. 17

18 19 Plaintiff Micron Technology, Inc. (“Micron”) brings this action against United 20 Microelectronics Corporation (“UMC”), Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd. (“Jinhua”), and 21 Does 1-10 as follows.

22 NATURE OF THE ACTION 23 1. Micron brings this action under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, the civil provisions 24 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), and California’s Uniform 25 Trade Secrets Act against UMC, Jinhua, and Does 1-10 for theft of Micron’s trade secrets and other 26 misconduct. The trade secrets relate to the design and manufacture of Dynamic Random Access 27 Memory (“DRAM”) integrated circuits – an industry with over $50 billion in annual revenues 28 worldwide.

NAI-1502776433 1 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 24

1 2. Defendant UMC is a semiconductor foundry with operations centered in Taiwan, 2 China, and Singapore. UMC’s primary business is to mass produce integrated-circuit logic 3 products based on designs and technology developed and provided by its customers. Although 4 lacking any significant, independent intellectual property in advanced DRAM technology, UMC 5 executed a deal with Defendant Jinhua – a start-up intending to manufacture DRAM products in 6 Mainland China – to provide Jinhua with DRAM process technology and enable Jinhua to become 7 a leading force in the DRAM business. How UMC could deliver such technology was a mystery 8 until recent criminal indictments in Taiwan exposed the defendants’ secret, illegal plan: 9 a. Since at least the fall of 2015, UMC and the founders of Jinhua developed 10 and set in motion a plan for UMC to recruit key personnel from Micron’s 11 Taiwanese affiliate – Micron Memory Taiwan Co., Ltd. (“MMT”) – 12 including MMT’s former Site Director, Stephen Chen (“Chen”); 13 b. Working in concert, UMC and Jinhua conspired to induce former MMT 14 employees to misappropriate electronic and paper files containing Micron 15 trade secrets from MMT and to deliver those trade secrets to UMC; 16 c. UMC then incorporated Micron’s trade secrets into technologies that it 17 transferred and/or plans to transfer to Jinhua to enable Jinhua to mass 18 produce advanced DRAM products as early as 2018 – thus avoiding 19 substantial, time-consuming and costly R&D efforts that UMC or Jinhua 20 would have had to undertake to compete fairly. 21 d. Aware that their trade secret theft was criminal, the participants in the 22 conspiracy went to great lengths to hide and cover up their plan, including 23 by: lying to human resources personnel when exiting Micron; lying to 24 Taiwanese criminal investigators; using software tools to wipe electronic 25 evidence; and even attempting to destroy or hide incriminating materials 26 from Taiwanese criminal authorities while the authorities were in the middle 27 of executing a search warrant at UMC. 28

NAI-1502776433 2 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 3 of 24

1 The original and certified translations of the Indictment Decision of the Taiwan Taichung District 2 Prosecutor’s Office, Case No. 106-Zhen-Zi Nos. 11035, 4520, 5612, and 5613 (the “Indictment”) 3 are attached as Exhibits 1 and 2. 4 3. As the Indictment reflects, UMC and Jinhua orchestrated and executed one of the 5 boldest schemes of commercial espionage in recent times. Defendants stand to profit handsomely 6 from their scheme: UMC is prepared to make hundreds of millions of dollars for its purported 7 “development work,” and Jinhua plans to avoid hundreds of millions of dollars in costs and the 8 many months of R&D effort that honest competition would require.

9 THE PARTIES 10 Plaintiff Micron 11 4. Founded in 1978, Micron is a global leader in advanced semiconductor systems and 12 solutions. Micron’s portfolio of high-performance memory technologies – including DRAM, 13 NAND and NOR Flash – is the basis for solid-state drives, modules, multichip packages, and other 14 system solutions. Micron’s technologies enable the world’s most innovative computing, consumer, 15 enterprise storage, networking, mobile, embedded, and automotive applications. Marketing its 16 products primarily to OEMs and retailers around the globe, Micron is ranked among the top five 17 semiconductor-producing companies in the world. Its common stock is traded on the NASDAQ 18 under the symbol “MU”. 19 5. A Delaware corporation with its headquarters in the United States at 8000 South 20 Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83707-0006, Micron has numerous locations in the United States and 21 around the world, including three locations in this District: (1) 2235 Iron Point Road, Folsom, 22 California 95630; (2) Tasman Technology Park, 590 Alder Drive, Milpitas, California 95035; and 23 (3) 3100 De La Cruz Blvd., Suite 300, Santa Clara, California 95054. 24 6. Micron employs over 30,000 people in eighteen countries worldwide, including 25 Taiwan, where it acquired Rexchip Electronics Corp. (“Rexchip”) – previously a joint venture 26 between Elpida Memory, Inc. of Japan and Powerchip Technology Corporation. With its exclusive 27 focus on DRAM production, Rexchip – now MMT – added breadth and depth to Micron’s already 28 world-class DRAM expertise. Micron is the sole owner of trade secrets in the Micron group of

NAI-1502776433 3 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 4 of 24

1 companies. Micron in turn licenses its trade secrets to certain subsidiaries such as MMT to enable 2 their business operations. 3 Defendant UMC 4 7. Defendant UMC is a global semiconductor foundry with several manufacturing 5 facilities worldwide, including in Taiwan and Mainland China. UMC has a significant sales 6 presence in the Northern District of California through its wholly-owned subsidiary UMC Group 7 (USA), located at 488 De Guigne Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94085. In its most recently filed 8 SEC Form 20-F, UMC reported inter-party sales into the United States to UMC Group (USA) of 9 approximately $1.8 billion. UMC recently reported that 43% of its foundry sales are in North 10 America, and those sales derive primarily from the United States. UMC is publicly traded on the 11 New York Stock Exchange and the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In early 2016, UMC established the 12 so-called New Business Development (“NBD”) group at the Second Factory Area of its Fab 12A in 13 Tainan Science Park, which group was responsible for delivering DRAM technology to Jinhua. 14 Defendant Jinhua 15 8. Defendant Jinhua is a limited liability company founded in Mainland China in early 16 2016 with the goal to rapidly and aggressively enter the DRAM business. Its shareholders are 17 commercial enterprises ultimately controlled by Fujian Province. With substantial government- 18 funding, Jinhua announced a $5.65 billion investment in its first 300mm fabrication facility, known 19 in the industry as a “fab”, and broke ground on July 16, 2016. Jinhua plans to be in commercial 20 DRAM production by 2018.

21 Co-Conspirators Chen, Rong, Ho, and Wang 22 9. Co-Conspirator Chen is the former Chairman of Rexchip and former Site Director 23 of MMT. Chen resigned from MMT on July 31, 2015, and officially joined UMC as a Senior Vice 24 President less than two months later. Shortly after leaving MMT, Chen began to recruit ranking 25 engineers and team leaders from MMT to UMC. Chen did so with the knowledge and intent that 26 those MMT personnel would use Micron trade secrets obtained during their time at MMT for the 27 benefit of UMC and Jinhua. 28

NAI-1502776433 4 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 5 of 24

1 10. Co-Conspirator Leh-Tian Rong (“Rong”) is UMC’s Assistant Vice President, with 2 oversight responsibility over four divisions and approximately sixty UMC employees. After Chen 3 joined UMC as Senior Vice President, he assigned Rong to serve as Assistant Vice President of 4 Project Technology Management Department 2 (“PM2”) – a critical division in UMC’s NBD 5 group. Thereafter, Rong knowingly conspired with UMC and Chen and directed the 6 misappropriation efforts of at least two other former MMT personnel in order to incorporate 7 Micron’s trade secrets into the technology UMC was developing for Jinhua. 8 11. Co-Conspirator J.T. Ho (“Ho”) is a former Process Integration Engineering (“PIE”) 9 Lead at MMT. Chen recruited Ho to work as a Process Integration Manager in UMC’s NBD 10 group. Ho took MMT’s electronic files and paper records – which Taiwanese prosecutors have 11 recognized to include Micron trade secrets – for use at UMC. Ho also took an active role in 12 recruiting at least one other MMT employee to steal Micron trade secrets. 13 12. Co-Conspirator Kenny Wang (“Wang” or “KW”) is a former Process 14 Integration/Device Section Manager at MMT. No later than January or February 2016, Ho began 15 recruiting Wang to UMC. Wang quickly showed interest, and Ho began treating Wang as a UMC 16 team member months before Wang had resigned from MMT. On the pretext that he would be 17 joining his family’s business, Wang submitted a resignation letter to MMT on April 5, 2016 and 18 asked to have April 26, 2016 be his last day. As described below, during the weeks leading up to 19 his last day, Wang worked diligently to steal a massive amount of Micron trade secrets for use at 20 UMC. Two days later, on April 28, 2016, Wang formally joined UMC and was assigned to the 21 PM2 division of the New Business Development Unit.

22 Doe Defendants 23 13. Many facets of the conspiracy described herein likely remain unknown, and the 24 complete list of Co-Conspirators likely extends beyond the individuals and entities identified here. 25 At present, Micron is ignorant of the true names and capacities of such individuals and entities and, 26 therefore, sues them herein under the fictitious names Does 1-10. Micron will amend its Complaint 27 to identify and state applicable claims, as appropriate, against additional individuals or entities as 28 relevant information becomes available through discovery.

NAI-1502776433 5 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 6 of 24

1 14. Each of the Co-Conspirators referenced in this Complaint was an agent, 2 conspirator, aider or abettor of UMC and/or Jinhua. The acts and omissions of each alleged Co- 3 Conspirator were performed within the course and scope of that agency, conspiracy, aiding or 4 abetting. At all relevant times, UMC and Jinhua were each acting with one or more of the Co- 5 Conspirators pursuant to a common scheme, course of action, enterprise, or conspiracy. 6 15. As used in this complaint, the term “Co-Conspirators” refers collectively to the 7 Defendants, Co-Conspirator Chen, Co-Conspirator Rong, Co-Conspirator Ho, Co-Conspirator 8 Wang, and the Doe defendants.

9 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10 16. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction of this case under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 11 1338: it is a civil action arising under the laws of the United States – specifically 18 U.S.C. 12 § 1836(b), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), and 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). While the amount in controversy has not 13 yet been quantified, it greatly exceeds $75,000. Accordingly, this Court also has subject-matter 14 jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). The Court 15 may also exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). 16 17. This Court has specific personal jurisdiction over UMC and Jinhua because UMC 17 and Jinhua have committed intentional acts of trade secret misappropriation and/or concrete acts in 18 furtherance of its conspiracy to commit trade secret misappropriation in the Northern District of 19 California. For example, Chen and other personnel from UMC joined a recruiting delegation by 20 Jinhua to a job fair hosted by the Chinese American Semiconductor Professional Association

21 (“CASPA”) in October 2016 in Santa Clara, California. In the course of that job fair, 22 representatives of UMC and Jinhua actively solicited applications from potential hires relying on 23 aggressive development roadmaps and assurances of technical capabilities that were in fact secretly 24 based on Micron’s stolen technology. In addition, Wang, in furtherance of the conspiracy, stored a 25 cache of stolen Micron trade secrets in the United States, when he uploaded them onto cloud 26 storage hosted on U.S.-based servers. 27 18. In addition, on information and belief, UMC continually engages in other 28 commercial activities in the United States, whereby it purposefully avails itself of the protections of

NAI-1502776433 6 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 7 of 24

1 U.S. law. In fact, on August 14, 2014, Micron and UMC entered into a non-disclosure agreement 2 to protect the parties’ respective confidential information – none of which concerned DRAM 3 technology. In that contract, the parties expressly agreed that the agreement should be governed by 4 and construed under the laws of California. What is more, UMC reported roughly $1.8 billion in 5 sales into the United States through its U.S. subsidiary, UMC Group (USA), which is located in the 6 Northern District of California. UMC recently noted that 43% of its foundry sales are in North 7 America, and those sales are primarily in the United States. 8 19. Because Defendant Jinhua is only indirectly owned by Fujian Province in the 9 People’s Republic of China, it does not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of a foreign 10 sovereign. Accordingly, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-1611 is not 11 implicated in this action. Moreover, the claims made herein are based upon Jinhua’s commercial 12 activity carried out in the United States; upon its acts performed in the United States in connection 13 with commercial activity elsewhere; and upon its commercial activity outside the United States 14 which activity causes a direct effect in the United States. 15 20. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) or, alternatively, 16 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(3). 17 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 18 21. As Taiwanese prosecutors have recognized, Micron and its affiliates have 19 implemented a robust and effective system for controlling access to Micron’s proprietary 20 information: 21 a. Micron stores its trade secrets on secure computers that require password- 22 protected access; such access is only supplied to employees and consultants 23 who have obligations of confidentiality to Micron including signed 24 confidentiality agreements and similar additional measures. 25 b. Micron requires password protection for both on-site network access and 26 off-site remote network access. Micron-issued laptops use industry- 27 standard encryption protections, such as Bit Locker, to encrypt laptop 28 content.

NAI-1502776433 7 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 8 of 24

1 c. All Micron personnel are required to protect Micron trade secrets according 2 to Micron’s Business Code of Conduct, and each Micron employee must 3 certify adherence to that Code. 4 d. Additional documents requiring that Micron’s trade secrets be held in 5 confidence include, but are not limited to, Micron employment agreements, 6 Micron’s employment handbooks (including Micron’s Taiwan Employment 7 Handbook), Micron’s local work rules (including Micron’s Taiwan Work 8 Rules), and employee termination agreements. 9 e. Micron personnel are required to complete a series of training courses 10 addressing the confidentiality of Micron information. Such training courses 11 include Protecting Proprietary Information and Information Security at 12 Micron. 13 f. Micron implements badge-controlled access to all Micron facilities. 14 g. Micron routinely reminds employees of their confidentiality obligations and 15 the importance of protecting trade secrets – including each time an 16 employee accesses Micron’s computer network. 17 h. Micron marks documents with confidentiality notices such as “Micron 18 Technology, Inc., Confidential and Proprietary” and “Micron Confidential / 19 Do Not Duplicate.” 20 22. Unfortunately, even those extensive protections could not prevent the concerted 21 criminal conspiracy to steal Micron technology described in this complaint. 22 23. Beginning at least as early as 2015, UMC and the founders of Jinhua developed and 23 set in motion a plan to induce former MMT employees to misappropriate Micron trade secrets and 24 deliver those trade secrets to UMC, which UMC would then transfer to Jinhua. Under the UMC- 25 Jinhua arrangement – to which they agreed in principle by January 2016 – UMC would provide 26 Jinhua with advanced DRAM technology in exchange for $300 million in R&D equipment, 27 $400 million in development fees, co-ownership of the resulting technology, and the potential for 28 additional future licensing revenues.

NAI-1502776433 8 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 9 of 24

1 24. However, as a semiconductor foundry with no advanced DRAM process, UMC had 2 no realistic capability to fulfill its commitments under their agreement. Jinhua knew that UMC did 3 not possess the technological resources to develop the promised technology by itself, and 4 understood that the technology would be based substantially on Micron’s DRAM designs and 5 processes. 6 25. Under Chen’s leadership, UMC targeted the Micron entity and fab that Chen knew 7 best: Rexchip, now MMT. Chen had resigned from MMT on August 31, 2015, and officially 8 joined UMC weeks later. In his role as Senior Vice President at UMC, Chen headed the NBD 9 group and held ultimate responsibility for its three technology divisions, including PM2. With 10 years at the helm of Rexchip and MMT, Chen had a wealth of knowledge on virtually every aspect 11 of MMT’s business – from technical details on Micron’s DRAM design and process to Micron 12 know how on manufacturing optimization, yield management, and product testing and quality. 13 Chen quickly used his connections within MMT to recruit various MMT personnel with access to 14 Micron trade secrets regarding many of the engineering and production challenges UMC’s NBD 15 group would inevitably face. Those recruits included Ho and Wang – both of whom would later 16 work together on process integration problems at UMC’s PM2. 17 26. Within weeks of Chen’s official start date at UMC, Ho also resigned from MMT. 18 Upon leaving, Ho took with him both electronic and hard copies of Micron’s proprietary 19 information, in clear and intentional violation of Micron and MMT’s corporate policies. As 20 Taiwanese authorities later explained, Ho then brought those trade secrets to UMC:

21 Because of his position as the section chief of MMT’s mass production department, JT Ho logged into [MMT’s] controlled 22 server to access electronic records relating to the DRAM production process, which is MTI’s trade secret (“Electronic Record A”). He 23 copied the records to his own USB . . . and personal hard drive . . . for his reference any time during work, and possessed the hardcopy 24 documents containing MTI’s trade secrets . . . collectively referred to as “Paper Documents B[.]” 25 [//] 26 Subsequently on October 15, 2015 when JT Ho resigned from 27 MMT, he did not destroy Electronic Record A and Paper Documents B in accordance with the agreements. JT Ho joined UMC in 28 November 2015 and became the Process Integration1 Manager NAI-1502776433 9 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 10 of 24

1 under PM2 in April 2016. In January 2016, JT Ho was aware that UMC started to carry out the cooperation project with Jinhua and 2 became MTI’s competitor, and he was aware that the Electronic Record A and the Paper Document B he possessed could contribute 3 to UMC’s and Jinhua’s mass production of DRAM in Mainland China. Instead of deleting or destroying Electronic Record A and 4 Paper Documents B, JT Ho reviewed Electronic Record A using his UMC issued laptop . . . during the period from January 2016 to 5 February 7, 2017 (the date when [Prosecutors] conducted the search). During this period, he also brought Paper Documents B to 6 the PI1 office for use.1 7 27. In January or February 2016, Ho began efforts to recruit Wang, MMT’s Process 8 Integration/Device Section Manager. With help from Ho, Wang submitted his résumé to UMC. 9 Wang later visited UMC, where Rong interviewed him. UMC and Wang agreed that Wang would 10 be hired with the same salary and benefits as he had at MMT, but that if Wang impressed Jinhua 11 and took a job in Mainland China, he would sign another contract with Jinhua and earn 12 substantially more. As Taiwanese prosecutors would later explain:

13 Subsequently on March 25, 2016, Kenny Wang received an Offer Letter from UMC, and informed JT Ho. . . . JT Ho thus started 14 treating Kenny Wang as a team member of UMC and discussed . . . the issues that UMC had in developing DRAM technologies. Kenny 15 Wang submitted his resignation letter to MMT on April 5, 2016 and left the company on April 26, 2016 upon the company’s approval. 16 From April 16 to 23, 2017, being fully aware that MTI and UMC are competitors in the development and manufacturing of DRAM and 17 with the intent to use the information in Mainland China and to damage MTI’s interest, Kenny Wang abused his authorization as the 18 Product Quality Integration Manager by using MMT’s laptop . . . to log on to MMT’s server and to access MTI’s electronic information 19 relating to the method, technology, process and design of DRAM (“Electronic Record C,” including a total of 931 files), which are 20 protected trade secrets and copyrighted works. He stored Electronic Record C onto the abovementioned laptop, transferred it to a USB 21 storage device . . . and then to two of his own laptops . . . and also uploaded it to his Google Drive . . . .2 22 23 28. In short, Wang spent his last days at MMT in a frenzied dash to pillage as much of 24 Micron’s confidential data as possible. On information and belief, Wang did so at the direction of 25 one or more of his Co-Conspirators. Wang copied stolen files to one or more removable drives, 26 including by using his work-issued laptop. He also uploaded the stolen trade secrets to a Google 27 1 Indictment (Exs. 1 and 2) at 4. 28 2 Indictment (Exs. 1 and 2) at 5. NAI-1502776433 10 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 11 of 24

1 drive. On information and belief, those stolen trade secrets stored on the Google drive were located 2 on servers located in the United States. 3 29. The trade secrets Wang stole covered the gamut of technologies necessary for UMC 4 to deliver its promised DRAM process to Jinhua. The stolen trade secrets included: 5 Information disclosing Micron’s DRAM manufacturing and testing processes; 6 Wafer acceptance test files including test structures/data and layout regarding areas 7 destroyed in processing; 8 Test programming files; 9 Probe performance and parametric tests showing testing and yield; 10 Test results; 11 Process information for 30nm, 25nm, 20nm, 1Xnm process nodes; 12 Metallization process and layout; 13 Failure-analysis information; 14 Reticle specification files; and many others. 15 30. With full knowledge of his wrongdoing, Wang also took a number of steps to try to 16 deceive Micron and cover his tracks. Before returning his MMT-issued laptop, Wang attempted to 17 wipe his laptop of any incriminating evidence. On April 23, 2016, he performed Google searches 18 on such terms as “Clear computer data” and “Clear computer use records”, and he accessed various 19 blogs on how to permanently erase a computer system. Later he downloaded and ran software 20 called “CCleaner” in an attempt to wipe his laptop. In addition, at his exit interview, on April 26, 21 2016, Wang lied and reported that he was leaving MMT to go to his hometown to join the family 22 business, when in fact he planned to formally join UMC only two days later. 23 31. Across the Taiwan strait, Jinhua laid the groundwork for its manufacturing 24 operations. On July 16 and 17, 2016, Jinhua held a public groundbreaking event for its DRAM 25 factory. The keynote speakers announced that the project was unique as the largest state-owned 26 production base for specialty DRAM products. They highlighted that, in its early stages, the Jinhua 27 project would mainly adopt technology obtained from UMC and that UMC had started talent 28 acquisition work in Taiwan and other regions. In effect, Jinhua acknowledged that its partner,

NAI-1502776433 11 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 12 of 24

1 UMC, lacked the technical wherewithal for the project and would have to “acquire” the necessary 2 talent from other companies in Taiwan and elsewhere. Some participants expressed pessimism, 3 fearing that the officials running Jinhua might underestimate the gap between China’s 4 semiconductor industry and established semiconductor leaders with decades of investments in 5 DRAM technology. In the view of some, the gap was too great to overcome. 6 32. UMC and its Co-Conspirators, however, lost little time trying to narrow that gap 7 illegally – by incorporating the stolen Micron trade secrets. The Indictment issued by Taiwanese 8 authorities captures at least part of the misappropriation scheme in graphic detail:

9 Subsequently one day in July or August 2016, when attending the PM2 morning meeting held by Leh-Tian Rong, Kenny Wang was 10 asked to stay in the meeting room with Ming-De Wei (the manager of PI2) after the meeting and discuss the draft of the F32 DRAM 11 design rules presented by Wei. Because UMC has specialized as a logic process foundry in the past and has no DRAM-related 12 designer’s manual, PI2 had to use a 65nm logic process designer’s manual as its blueprint. 13 [//] 14 The abovementioned draft therefore lacked the necessary parameters 15 of “Cell,” “Array” and “Periphery” in the DRAM design rules. Kenny Wang thus provided his comments on ion-implantation 16 process parameters (a key process to control doping in semiconductor manufacturing). Leh-Tian Rong, albeit fully aware 17 that Kenny Wang left MMT nearly six months previously and that the MMT information Kenny Wang possessed was likely obtained 18 illegally, asked Kenny Wang to compare the F32 DRAM design rules of UMC with MMT’s materials (i.e. the DR25nmS design 19 rules), circle out the differences between the two, write down [MMT’s] “stabilization data” on UMC’s draft design rules, fill in 20 necessary parameters relating to ion-implantation which cannot be obtained through reverse engineering, and help complete the parts 21 including “Cell”, “Array”, and “Periphery” for Rong’s review, so that UMC can complete the F32 DRAM design rules more quickly. 22 [//] 23 Two to three days after Kenny Wang received the said instructions 24 from Rong, he downloaded UMC’s final version of the logic IC design rules, created columns for “Cell,” “Array” and “Periphery” 25 and filled in parameters for “width” and “space” on more than 10 pages of UMC’s final version of the design rules, using the 26 DR25nmS design rules as a reference. Kenny Wang quickly completed the addition and revision of the parameters and handed in 27 28

NAI-1502776433 12 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 13 of 24

1 the hard copies containing the parameters of the DR25nmS design rules to Leh-Tian Rong in person.3 2 3 33. The Micron trade secrets that Wang stole proved invaluable to UMC’s development 4 effort and critical to the timeline of the Jinhua DRAM project. As Taiwanese prosecutors have 5 concluded:

6 Rong handed [the hard copies] to Wei and told Wei to discuss them with Kenny Wang. Wei, unaware of the foregoing, discussed the 7 stability . . . parameters of UMC’s F32 DRAM design and other parameters with Kenny Wang and Wu Kuo-How, an engineer of 8 PI2, and completed UMC’s F32 DRAM design rules. Originally UMC had no mask tape out team or ion-implantation specialists. 9 After Kenny Wang provided the DR25nmS design rules production parameters, PI2 skipped processes such as the optical lithography 10 adjustment, etching and yellow light processes when developing the F32 DRAM. The design rules were completed within only 2 months 11 and handed to the chip design manufacturer for the next step. Kenny Wang was promoted to Device Manager in January 2017 for 12 excellent performance in reducing the time, costs, equipment and labor in producing the design rules.4 13 14 34. These acts of misappropriation were encouraged and directed by UMC, Chen and 15 Jinhua. Indeed, in July 2016 – the same period in which Rong and Wang were actively 16 incorporating Micron’s trade secrets into UMC’s DRAM design rules – Chen is reported to have 17 made a presentation to the Hefei Economic Development Board, the governance board for a 18 Mainland development zone near where construction on Jinhua’s DRAM project had recently 19 begun. During that presentation, Chen reportedly told one or more members of the Development 20 Board that he was using “Rexchip” (now Micron) technology at UMC. He reportedly admitted that 21 UMC itself preferred not to have its name attached to Chen’s presentation because of concerns over 22 legal liability. 23 35. The Co-Conspirators took steps in furtherance of the conspiracy in the United 24 States as well. In June 2016, Jinhua posted material on the U.S.-based organization CASPA’s 25 website advertising numerous Jinhua job openings in a variety of DRAM positions, including 26 process and design R&D, manufacturing, DRAM yield and process optimization, and DRAM 27 3 Indictment (Exs. 1 and 2) at 6. 28 4 Id. at 6-7. NAI-1502776433 13 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 14 of 24

1 testing. In October 2016, UMC and Jinhua sent a travelling delegation to Silicon Valley, led 2 personally by Chen, to recruit additional personnel for the DRAM project. Attended by upwards of 3 30 guests, the job fair was hosted by CASPA and sponsored by Jinhua, which had over ten 4 recruiters present. Because Micron is the only DRAM manufacturer in the world headquartered in 5 the United States, the Co-Conspirators knew or expected that some or all of their recruits would 6 come from Micron. On information and belief, the Co-Conspirators also knew and intended that 7 the recruitment of top talent in Silicon Valley would enable UMC and Jinhua to make optimal use 8 of Micron’s trade secrets in the development and operation of Jinhua’s DRAM project. 9 36. During the presentation, UMC and Jinhua emphasized that Jinhua’s first fab would 10 start its pilot run by the fourth quarter of 2017, with mass production of its first DRAM product 11 beginning only one year later. This ambitious roadmap, which would tend to assuage any concerns 12 of job candidates that the project was distant or speculative, would not be possible without the use 13 of the stolen Micron trade secrets. In a shocking admission of their illegitimate intentions, the 14 slides UMC and Jinhua presented that day openly referred to the venture’s first two DRAM 15 products as “F32” and “F32S”, which are the exact internal codenames of DRAM products 16 developed and designed by Elpida (later acquired and owned by Micron), which had been in 17 production at the Rexchip fab (now Micron’s Fab 16) where Co-Conspirators Chen, Ho, and Wang 18 all previously worked. 19 37. At or about the same time that UMC and Jinhua organized their recruiting trip to 20 California, they also continued to work together to poach additional MTT personnel in Taiwan for 21 Jinhua’s DRAM project in China. Recruiting efforts by Sandy Kuo (“Kuo”) – a UMC Project 22 Manager – provide a graphic example. Before joining UMC, Kuo had been the Manager of 23 Communication and Talent Strategy at MMT, at which time she had reported directly to Co- 24 Conspirator Chen (then, Site Director of MMT). After Chen left MMT for UMC, he recruited Kuo 25 to follow him to UMC in February 2016. In her MMT employment agreement, Kuo had 26 committed, for a period of 12 months after leaving MMT, “not to solicit, encourage or induce or 27 assist any third party to solicit, encourage or induce” other MMT employees to take employment 28 outside of MMT.

NAI-1502776433 14 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 15 of 24

1 38. Kuo wasted little time in breaching her non-solicit agreement. In late 2016, she 2 actively helped Chen to recruit MMT employees for Jinhua – including S.Y. Chen, an MMT 3 Process Manager with responsibilities in the key process areas of “diffusion” and “wet etch.” In an 4 email to S.Y. Chen dated November 28, 2016, Kuo underscored how actively involved Jinhua was 5 in UMC’s improper recruitment efforts: “Stephen [Chen] would like to have more description of 6 your career in order to clarify your future position and provide to Jinhua investor from China side.” 7 Kuo even attached a “Jinhua Personnel Sheet” for S.Y. Chen to fill out. Copied on Kuo’s email 8 was Neil Lee, another former senior manager from MMT who had resigned within weeks of the 9 resignation of Ho. S.Y. Chen subsequently resigned from Micron to join UMC/Jinhua. 10 39. Meanwhile, UMC and Jinhua rewarded the individual Co-Conspirators for their 11 contributions to the illegal scheme. After incorporating Micron trade secrets into UMC’s DRAM 12 design rule, Wang was promoted to manager of UMC’s Device Department. On February 22, 2017 13 – shortly after Taiwanese prosecutors raided UMC’s NBD facility – UMC promoted and 14 transferred Chen to serve as President of Jinhua in Mainland China. 15 40. The Taiwanese criminal authorities launched their first of two raids on UMC’s 16 NBD facility on February 7, 2017. When the authorities arrived on site, UMC’s HR team alerted 17 Rong, who immediately instructed Wang and Ho to delete and remove all information on their 18 systems relating to Micron. Following Rong’s instruction, Wang and Ho handed anything 19 containing incriminating materials, including Wang’s cellphone, to a UMC assistant. The assistant 20 locked the materials in her personal locker and left the UMC facility with Wang’s cellphone. 21 Unbeknownst to Wang, the criminal authorities had previously obtained a search warrant and had 22 been monitoring Wang’s cellphone. When confronted with the fact that the criminal authorities 23 knew about his missing cellphone, Wang lied and said that the assistant borrowed his phone that 24 morning “because she wanted to see some photos.” At the criminal authorities’ insistence, UMC 25 instructed the assistant to return to UMC and hand over the phone, which she then did. The 26 assistant later confessed that she committed a crime in attempting to hide evidence. Because she 27 later cooperated, and because she was pressured into committing the crime by her UMC superiors, 28

NAI-1502776433 15 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 16 of 24

1 the Taiwanese criminal authorities elected not to indict her (opting to issue a deferred indictment 2 decision instead). 3 41. UMC itself admits that Wang’s conduct constitutes a crime under Taiwanese law. 4 In an act of apparent desperation, UMC filed its own criminal complaint against Wang, under the 5 theory that UMC was somehow the victim, rather than the beneficiary and mastermind, of Wang’s 6 trade secret theft. The Taiwanese criminal authorities rejected UMC’s complaint, ruling UMC was 7 no victim here. 8 42. Finally, on August 8, 2017, after nearly a year of investigation, the Taiwanese 9 criminal authorities indicted UMC, Rong, Ho, and Wang for conspiring to steal and misappropriate 10 Micron trade secrets in order to deliver that technology to Jinhua to enable it to illegally and 11 unfairly compete in the DRAM business. 12 43. The criminal investigation and subsequent indictments have not slowed the Co- 13 Conspirators’ efforts. On May 11, 2017, Jinhua announced a partnership with Air Products, a U.S. 14 industrial gas supplier, for Air Products to provide gas supply for Jinhua’s memory fab. Relying on 15 Jinhua’s aggressive DRAM forecasts, which depend on incorporating Micron’s trade secrets, Air 16 Products committed to build a state-of-the-art nitrogen plant to supply a broad range of ultra-high 17 purity gases to Jinhua. In July 2017, Jinhua announced its fab construction was ahead of schedule 18 and kicked off a second wave of recruitment. Even after UMC’s indictment for trade secret theft 19 became public, UMC announced that it was moving ahead full steam with Jinhua and that it was on 20 track to complete the first stage of the project in 2018. 21 44. Micron seeks civil redress to the full extent of applicable law. 22 COUNT I 23 Misappropriation of Trade Secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act 24 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b) 25 45. Micron repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of 26 paragraphs 1 through 44, inclusive, above. 27 46. The above alleged facts constitute actual and threatened misappropriation of 28 Micron trade secrets by UMC and Jinhua under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836 and 1839.

NAI-1502776433 16 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 17 of 24

1 47. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Micron owned the Micron trade secrets as 2 Micron was the entity in which rightful legal or equitable title to the Micron trade secrets is 3 reposed. 4 48. The Micron trade secrets include scientific, technical, economic, and engineering 5 information. The Micron trade secrets include plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, 6 designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, and/or codes, which are 7 tangible and/or intangible. 8 49. Micron has taken reasonable measures to protect the secrecy of the Micron trade 9 secrets. 10 50. The Micron trade secrets derive independent economic value, actual or potential, 11 from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, 12 another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information. 13 51. The Micron trade secrets are related to and used in Micron products and services 14 sold or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce. 15 52. Micron derives significant economic benefits from owning the Micron trade 16 secrets. 17 53. The Co-Conspirators improperly acquired, disclosed, used, appropriated, took, 18 carried away, concealed, copied, duplicated, downloaded, replicated, transmitted, sent, uploaded, 19 communicated, or conveyed the Micron trade secrets for the benefit of UMC and Jinhua. They 20 performed such acts in furtherance of the trade secret misappropriation in at least Taiwan, Mainland 21 China, and the Northern District of California. 22 54. The use of the Micron trade secrets by Co-Conspirators was without Micron’s 23 authorization. Micron did not consent to their acquisition, disclosure, or use of the Micron trade 24 secrets. 25 55. The Co-Conspirators intended to convert the Micron trade secrets to the economic 26 benefit of one other than their owner, Micron. 27 56. The Co-Conspirators knew and intended that Micron, as the owner of the Micron 28 trade secrets, would be injured by their actions.

NAI-1502776433 17 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 18 of 24

1 57. As a result of the Co-Conspirators’ misappropriation of Micron trade secrets, 2 Micron has suffered actual damages in an amount to be proven at trial. 3 58. As a result of the Co-Conspirators’ misappropriation, UMC and Jinhua have been 4 unjustly enriched. 5 59. Micron further pleads entitlement to a reasonable royalty to compensate Micron for 6 UMC’s and Jinhua’s misappropriation of trade secrets. 7 60. Micron is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants’ 8 misappropriation of Micron’s trade secrets was willful and malicious based on the facts alleged 9 herein. UMC and Jinhua acted with a purpose and willingness to commit the acts alleged, and 10 UMC’s and Jinhua’s conduct was not reasonable under the circumstances. Micron is therefore 11 entitled to exemplary damages and attorney fees and costs. Micron further seeks exemplary 12 damages against UMC and Jinhua in an amount up to two times the amount of Micron’s actual 13 damages according to proof under 18 U.S.C. § 1836. 14 61. The misappropriation of the Micron trade secrets has caused and will continue to 15 cause Micron irreparable and substantial injury and therefore cannot be fully redressed through 16 damages alone. 17 62. If the Co-Conspirators were permitted to continue to use and disseminate the 18 Micron trade secrets, Micron will be irreparably harmed and the economic damages to Micron will 19 be difficult to quantify. An injunction prohibiting UMC and Jinhua from further acquisition, 20 disclosure, use, and possession of the Micron trade secrets is necessary to provide Micron with 21 complete relief. 22 63. UMC’s and Jinhua’s wrongful conduct alleged herein by their misappropriation of 23 Micron’s trade secrets will continue unless enjoined and restrained by this Court, and will cause 24 great and irreparable injury to Micron’s business, and it could cause UMC and Jinhua to have 25 improper advantages, positions, and rights in the marketplace to Micron’s detriment. Absent 26 injunctive relief, UMC’s and Jinhua’s further disclosure and use of Micron’s trade secrets could 27 irreparably harm Micron. 28

NAI-1502776433 18 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 19 of 24

1 COUNT II 2 Civil RICO 3 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) 4 64. Micron repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of 5 paragraphs 1 through 63, inclusive, above. 6 65. The Co-Conspirators formed an association-in-fact enterprise (the “Enterprise”) to 7 engage in activities to affect interstate and foreign commerce by collaborating to misappropriate 8 and use Micron’s trade secrets to manufacture advanced DRAM products in Mainland China for 9 sale and distribution in China and around the world. The Enterprise operated by the Co- 10 Conspirators includes UMC and Jinhua but is separate and distinct from either of them. 11 66. In furtherance of the Enterprise, the Co-Conspirators intended to and knowingly 12 stole and, without Micron’s authorization, copied, downloaded, uploaded, photocopied, replicated, 13 transmitted, delivered, communicated, or conveyed Micron’s trade secrets. 14 67. The Co-Conspirators also received, acquired, or possessed Micron’s trade secrets, 15 knowing that they had been stolen, obtained, or converted without Micron’s authorization. 16 68. The Co-Conspirators intentionally engaged in these acts to benefit UMC and 17 Jinhua, with the knowledge or intent that these acts would injure Micron. They did so at least in 18 Taiwan, Mainland China, and the Northern District of California. 19 69. The actions of the Co-Conspirators abroad and in California constitute racketeering 20 activities in violation of 18 U.S.C § 1832. This pattern of activity poses a threat of continuing 21 because Jinhua and UMC are continuing to proceed with the production of DRAM products using 22 Micron’s trade secrets. 23 70. UMC benefited from its employees’ and agents’ racketeering activities, and the 24 racketeering activities of Chen, Rong, Ho, and Wang were committed within the scope of their 25 employment while at UMC. 26 71. As a direct and proximate result of racketeering activities and violations of 27 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) by the Co-Conspirators, Micron has suffered economic damages both 28

NAI-1502776433 19 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 20 of 24

1 domestically and abroad, including, but not limited to, injuries in the Northern District of California 2 and in Boise, Idaho, in an amount to be proven at trial. 3 72. The aforementioned acts of the Co-Conspirators were done willfully, with malice 4 toward Micron, entitling Micron to treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. 5 73. The racketeering activities and violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) has caused and 6 will continue to cause Micron irreparable and substantial injury and therefore cannot be fully 7 redressed through damages alone. An injunction prohibiting UMC and Jinhua from further 8 acquisition, disclosure, use, and possession of the Micron trade secrets is necessary to provide 9 Micron with complete relief. 10 74. If the Co-Conspirators were permitted to continue to engage in their racketeering 11 activities and violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), Micron would be irreparably harmed and the 12 economic damages to Micron will be difficult to quantify. 13 COUNT III 14 Civil RICO 15 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) 16 75. Micron repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of 17 paragraphs 1 through 74, inclusive, above. 18 76. The Co-Conspirators have intentionally conspired and agreed to directly and 19 indirectly participate in the affairs of the Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activities in 20 violation of 18 U.S.C § 1832, as described in Count II.

21 77. The Co-Conspirators knew that their actions constituted a pattern of racketeering 22 activities and agreed to those actions in furtherance of, and for the benefit of the Enterprise, as 23 described in Count II. 24 78. The actions of the Co-Conspirators constitute a conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C 25 § 1962(c), in violation of 18 U.S.C § 1962(d). 26 79. As a direct and proximate result of racketeering activities and violations of 27 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) by the Co-Conspirators, Micron has suffered economic damages both 28

NAI-1502776433 20 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 21 of 24

1 domestically and abroad, including, but not limited to, injuries in the Northern District of California 2 and in Boise, Idaho, in an amount to be proven at trial. 3 80. The aforementioned acts of the Co-Conspirators were done willfully, with malice 4 toward Micron, entitling Micron to treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. 5 COUNT IV 6 Trade Secret Misappropriation Under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act 7 Cal. Civ. Code § 3426 8 81. Micron repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of 9 paragraphs 1 through 44, inclusive, above. 10 82. The Micron trade secrets constitute information, including compilations, programs, 11 devices, methods, techniques, or processes that derive independent economic value from not being 12 generally known to the public or other persons who can obtain economic value from the trade 13 secrets’ disclosure. 14 83. Micron has taken reasonable measures to protect the secrecy of the Micron trade 15 secrets. 16 84. However, the Co-Conspirators intended to and knowingly stole and, without 17 authorization, disclosed, acquired, used, copied, downloaded, uploaded, photocopied, replicated, 18 transmitted, delivered, communicated, or conveyed Micron’s trade secrets. 19 85. The Co-Conspirators acquired, used or disclosed Micron’s trade secrets, knowing 20 that they have been stolen, obtained, or converted without Micron’s authorization. The Co-

21 Conspirators intentionally engaged in these acts to benefit UMC and Jinhua, with the knowledge or 22 intent that these acts would injure Micron. 23 86. As a direct and proximate result of violations of Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1 by the Co- 24 Conspirators, Micron has suffered economic damages both domestically and abroad, including, but 25 not limited to, in the Northern District of California and in Boise, Idaho, in an amount to be proven 26 at trial but exceeding $75,000. 27 87. The aforementioned acts of the Co-Conspirators were done willfully, with malice 28 toward Micron.

NAI-1502776433 21 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 22 of 24

1 88. As a result of UMC’s and Jinhua’s misappropriation, Micron has suffered actual 2 damages and UMC and Jinhua have been unjustly enriched. Micron pleads in the alternative that, if 3 it is determined that neither actual damages nor unjust enrichment is provable, then Micron is 4 entitled to a reasonable royalty to compensate Micron for misappropriation of trade secrets by 5 UMC and Jinhua. 6 89. Micron further seek exemplary damages against UMC and Jinhua in an amount up 7 to two times the amount of Micron’s actual damages according to proof under Cal. Civ. Code 8 § 3426.3. 9 90. Micron is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants’ 10 misappropriation of Micron’s trade secrets was willful and malicious based on the facts alleged 11 herein. UMC and Jinhua acted with a purpose and willingness to commit the acts alleged, and their 12 conduct was not reasonable under the circumstances. Micron is therefore entitled to exemplary 13 damages, attorney fees, and costs under Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.4. 14 91. The wrongful conduct and misappropriation of Micron’s trade secrets alleged 15 herein will continue unless enjoined and restrained by this Court, and will cause great and 16 irreparable injury to Micron’s business, and it could cause UMC and Jinhua to have improper 17 advantages, positions, and rights in the marketplace to Micron’s detriment. Absent injunctive 18 relief, further disclosure and use of Micron’s trade secrets by UMC and/or Jinhua would irreparably 19 harm Micron. 20 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 21 WHEREFORE, Micron respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment against all 22 defendants as follows: 23 a. For actual damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 24 b. Restitution, unjust enrichment, and disgorgement of profits from UMC 25 and Jinhua resulting from misappropriation of Micron’s trade secrets; 26 c. Royalties; 27 d. Entry of an order that restrains and preliminarily enjoins, and a Final 28 Order that permanently enjoins, UMC, Jinhua, and their agents, servants, employees,

NAI-1502776433 22 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 23 of 24

1 attorneys, and all persons acting in active concert or participation with them, from the 2 unauthorized acquisition, disclosure, use, duplication, or distribution of the Micron 3 trade secrets; 4 e. Exemplary and punitive damages; 5 f. Treble damages as provided in 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(c) and 1964(d); 6 g. Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs; 7 h. Prejudgment interest; 8 i. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

9 Dated: December 5, 2017 JONES DAY 10

11 By: s/ Randall E. Kay Randall E. Kay 12 Counsel for Plaintiff 13 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NAI-1502776433 23 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 24 of 24

1 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 2 Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Micron demands a jury 3 trial on all issues triable to a jury.

4 Dated: December 5, 2017 JONES DAY

5

6 By: s/ Randall E. Kay Randall E. Kay 7 Counsel for Plaintiff 8 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NAI-1502776433 24 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 29

1111111111111111 1111 111111 2 1 1 0 6 1 3 0 3 7 6 1g Jjf *~*t~~*~~~~~~~~~- 106if-)i 1~ * i l 1035!t 106-{f-li.1~ * i4520!t 106if-)i 1~ * i 5612~t 106-{f-)i 1~ * 11; 56 l 3!t % 1aJ ~ ~ ~ 41 ~ C ~ ~ 64-{f--11 A 5 s ±. ) 11. :i: t rr ~ ~ ~ 1uJ Ji i!f l 29!t % :I: 1W rp #Jr rp ~ *- JJl]t 7' ~ 6We, ~ R.~'.5t-Wi-f:ft-f:Jidt: B121163317!t il!1£ ~ ti A. J 11 ~ it tip ~t % .:£ 7]( ~ JJ 42 ~ C ~ ~ 6 3 -{f--10 A 25 El ±. ) 11. ~ t rr m~ ~ .5(_,~ mli..~1~1.201 We. ,, ' o ll{i.z.9 . ,, ~ R.~ '.5t"Wi-fa.Jt.-f::dt: B121352878!t

• p . ,. il!1£ fij ti A. Jl± :kf :tit tip ~ .,; ·:·&)CJ f~ -tg Z it tip C1 o 6 -{f- 2 A 7 s ~ J.I:. ~ 1:£- ijru 1~ ) ~t % ~ ~ k JJ 53 ~ ( R. ~ 52-{f- 9 A 19 s ± ) 11. :I: mrp #Jr rp ~ :k_;11Jt -l:: ~50!t8~ % :I: 1W rp #Jr rp ~ :k_J11Jt .=-~6!t8itz.5 ~ R.~ ~~fa.ft-f:~!t : Hl21305464!t il!1£ 'ij ti A. f~ -tg Z it gip ; .~- :J@. * tip t 1J *~it tip C106-{f-6 A 19 s #-- J.I:. ~1:E- nM 1~ ) 1t % lfti .f 'ft -f ~ rn'" 1f rll ~ 6J 't~ #Jy ft rr fJ .ft-=-~ 3 ~ fa.ft- t.~ !t : 47217677Wc. 1t ~ A. ~# la- Jtt {l l6J ..t. ~ 1£ ~ ti. A. ; .~- :J@. # trp ~ ~ ;t. it trp

h 1',,l. _cl:. fr.le r.A ,,#. ,;:; ._t-l- ~ .1-•I, R ,'.}_ 1::/f 4i=-14 ~ I.if< JJ:. * J.~ 1.-:1;, ~1] it,;; ~-r. ~ J:.. 7 1 1l5l o ~ ~ 1-t.. 1;,,..__ 1g' ~ '1~ J5:; n:;; ~ m T ' ~ f,;c_ ' 17'1. ~ ;.:, J:o ' ;;,~ 1,•t ;;~ ~

1 Exhibit 1 Page 1 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 29

~0~,tt~~n•~&-·ftM~**~~~T: 1E.* ... -,M~~,i~a~Ahl~t~#~i•oo~~+*~I~~ ~~4 -rl369 iJt~Jla't-=f-JJf10"1fNl0§] (T1i1rtJla0§J) Z ~ .::r:. 0 ~ la 0 §] 1i re El -*" E1 pi da Memo r y , Inc ( T 1i El -*" pffi , . ~~0§J)~~~hA#ft~~1f~0a1~•a~z0aJ, '1ft:, th ~ fiiAl -tt- Jf{ te. ·ti ft ( T 1iDRAM) a\ 00 z _f • 1\ .::c. 0 ~ ~Micron Technology, Inc (T1i~~~Jt0§J) ttt~"t~;(f. ~~~~~ffl~~&*,~~••A•~~--w~, NAND f 1ash.&.NOR f 1ash te. ,t;t ft;.l £ , tJ. & :it~ ~¥-i~ "1i" ~ ~ .f ~ tt t jft. , ~ ~ ~ 102 lJ:. M~t ~I El -*- ij ~ ~ 0 aJ , ~ ls 0 a] z %t.tJJf;rli ' 73 ~f El* firo ~ ~ 0 a)~~ A Micron Memory

0 J apan ' ft ~f 1it ls 0 a) ~ ~ A ~ ~!t ~ 7t te. ·t! ft }Jf 15i 1f Hl 0 a) '· "" C',i. 0- et ( T ~i ~Ji·~ 7t 0 aJ ) , 1iiJ~~ , .£ 7j(_.i£ rtsl iJ:l:.pj. A~ ~ :1t .. ,. i' ,·, 1.:: 4 G (.a J 0 aJ z • .::r:. 0 ~ ~ ~ 7t 0 aJ w~ 100 lJ:. 9 A 2 El , ~f ,I ~ ti .. 0 a) ?Jr 1f z ~t=Y ~ jlf ;.l ;rl{ ~.tl Mr#Jr j;a i,t ~ Jt ~ a] (Micron Semiconductor Asia) 1l ffl ' ifiJ ~ li ~ Jt 0 aJ ft~:lrk w~AOOz"1i"*'ft~,••,a~••m,ftm~~,~

Eb t&! - fr/'< -c- .'-k $.. 'I i 3'.l=l /.~ ..\-: :/,. 4-+ ~k '' 'I W -r~ I, I::!/,~-.\: 'JIJt ' 1.!2.1 7F ~ /J ~ J - j.:A .,c,~ >.JL 1~ ' /JX. .r."'J ;;/if"., f ' 3E J;A ~ ~ ~G ;J,;J(, /J .:,;." ~#4~1f~•.&.*M#Jf{~~z«a~aa:~~~:1t0 a)·.::L~A«B~RB#Jf{i~«-~•,~-A~~&• k,~ , lL ~ 105 lJ:.4 A 20 El ~ &p ~ 1-f 1l ffl USB PORT ( i!.fi « JJ~ ~~~~#a•z-a~o)~H-tt-*'i~«•~•ffl~ • a ;JI=- - ,igt ~, & ti iJt • m z .A.. ?Jr *o ' ~ ;Jr ~ Iii~~ 1J 1.t ' 1f ~~z~-tt~,$,l*•~•*J2•ffl•z••~-o f; 5!i ~ Jt/~ aJ ~ 103 .if-2 A 28 a~ Jk@ Jk 7t 1~ §J -ii-11 -t i1i-A MTI/MMT Design Engineering Services Agreementz~i~ ,~.~~~~~~#4MMrtsl1~ffl]f{~z~AMA•C ~~·-~-)#.-tlk•lk~0~,ft~~Elft~M~~ A~0§Jztt#ifn~~ffll~~~~~0aJz~AMJ.1• 0 2 Exhibit 1 Page 2 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 3 of 29

~,m•t~~~~~0~(T.fflt0~)•*~J-~~* ~ tt t ~ ( IC ) a0a fE l- l" 1\ .:r.. JJ!i :f} a!J /A'" ~ , -f I~ t 1ft l= DRAM z~~.&.M~'~*~•w~t•~••,~~l&~Afl ti :MI .f. ti 0 ~ * 1t.. t~ ri O A .f_ 1O 5 !rf- 1 A M , lftt t 0 ~ iJf~ J ~k~~~~~~=••~t~~~0~CT•;•0~) i~t{ , ~ ~ t~ t! i!1t32-* * DRAM.&.32S -* * DRAMi:El n~. fl.& •~•,w;•0~~*3~~ic.W~~•~•a~,~* ~•i!&~M~#-t0ij4~~fc,~•~*w~~#~ i$. ~ ' 1l tt ft 1i~t 1c. ~ 11 Wf-*' ff .f_ ; • 0 ~ i!1t 3 2-* * DRAM.&. 32S **DRAMzi;f O lfttt0~ ·~tAtR~ 1Ji;Ji1,itf%1t• , ~ 105 .ff:-1 A M-t£ ~ iw rr ;ff* IE ~Fab12A1it ~~ ~ pq ~ sr. 1 #Jj­ l= "t 1f Jl tJ:1,~ J (New Business Developmnt 'T;fiNBD ) , wf~Lil. Jf ( &- ~ 51f ~ it 0 ~ ~ l= -& , ~ 104 !rf- 7 A 31 8 ~ " " ~ , 3i~ 104 !rf-9 A M tt1::1:- lfgp t /A'"~ j-i*- i 1J t.t j&l.f , * 5(_ M .(,, < · .•, ...., u ~Stephen ) ~ -l:±.¥t-, At~NBD T~sr.l-.ft1#-bt (T •™1) ,-t-~ft-~A(T.™2).&.l-•tt•~bt(T

!;.< <1 ,,,,. ., r. ;f,i-PM3 ) f. %~ ri , fi ~ 4'~ .J.&- -f± ~ 5i ~ it 0 ~ 1£ ~ z 1aJ ~ ~ •.) , ..£ 7](~ f. A , Ji re~~ ~t,i1:E-PM2 %~ ri z t~ l.f O PM2 Ttt ~ *1. ~ % - %~ ( T ;fi PI 1 ) , ~;fl.~%~%~ ( T ;f,i-PI 2 ) , AA f8-$} *ff ff l.f %~ ( T ;fiDM) & ic 1t %~ ( T ;fiDev ice) 0 Jf9p t 0 ~ ~ 105 · ~3 A 11 a foJ i&~t~tt j- ~ t!~ l t- tp ttti uf ~tl 1K ;J.t 1,itf % 1'F ~ , !& ti t- ~ 10 5 .ff:-4 A 12 a i:i. t& ~ ~ ~ 1f; 10 5 0 0055030 !Jt Jsi ,l 1t O Jf~p t 0 ij ' ; • 0 ij .&. 8 '*-Ultra Memoryinc. (T;f,i-8-*"UMI 0~) f-~~ '41~105 iJ:-llA 8 EJ Jf-ir 1 F32 *"*-ttttJJ~•ttfhtl (F32nm Design Service Agreement ) , J ' t.0 ;t ~~ ~~P 't 0 ~ faff -;fi1J ;t~DRAM~ it Jl Jl1J ( *5(.~;fi: Design Rule , Layout Rule , w~..f~tt~;fI. & 1,#1i - ri l- -t , ~ iR X:ti ~it a!J -ii 1,# , z.. Bi ~ 11 ~ M~~ti ~~-~*~~·'&-i±~-~~;1£~~~~~-~ili* ~,s~-*~€~A~~ttt~-~~)#M~•A~~ 3 Exhibit 1 Page 3 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 4 of 29

,~xa*~r0~~tta~1*~,&ff,~fftt~&A J4 -tttt ~ 11 , j,~~378 ~ 3, ooo~ ic.z-tttt JJ!Lt! t m.t~ re% •0~~3M~#~8~~I0~,a~~I0~~~~~ 3t x 1tGDS ( TVO & TVl ) it~ & TVl ~ J4 DDR4.fi. ' *;j~ !l itt32/32S-* *DRAMr1r, 1t.tt.-Wr 5t. % *0 ~ ~4tDRAM~ £ ;_ jf_ 0 **«0~z~AAM~~,£*"'~-~A~fftt~~ • ~ , i; A .ft MIJeAt 0 ..=:.. , 1iiT~~~ 103 lf=-2 A 24 s -if.~ tit~ 7'60 ~ 1£~ et W* J7. r lft -%~Jar~-&~AM~%~J ,~-Ji~~~M~~­ ~~~7'60~z--g~~k*'M~~-~~*•;Jif~~ ttz•~•~c~~*·~-)z~#,~-,-~*~Jt ~~#~•••~z~£1~0~,~#Jt~*~~~*& «-f--Ji ~1*-#z t-1a ; %=-1iiJ~~-if.qp ~lit~ 7'60 ~ zffe!~ AJ:. ,, #;Jif--j-~,4M~·--·~~~,3tM~~MJt•;Jif (• (: t, C. ,;;. (1 ~-- 0 ~~ttz~* M~~~-~~~~~0~iA*%~-~ •{,~ ,, ~ f} , W1t- At~ 0 ~ ;fir If °*1 z 1: ~~H~ JJ!i ~ , 1l 1Pl ~ DRAM fA.¥.

;Jifg,A~A~A7'60~*•~•z«-~¥(T~A~• (.l 'b e, " "' ~­ (_, ,,. • jiif) ' .3i~ ~ ~ §l G rJT ;fir zFil~ ~ ( l:?p 11ft * 7' P.t4bJ Jf 4h £ ~ ~t36rJT iF 4h £) ' 1i Ait.~ ( l:?p 11ft ;tz -f= .PlT iF 4h £) ' J-~ 1¥--

1~ *~ ~ *tt 1Pl I A# ;Jif A~ A~ 0 ~ * • ~-z ~* • ,1;4 ( l:?p Ftt * 7' P.t 4bJ 4 4bJ £ iAh 1t 35 z !$J Jt 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11, 12,13,14~!.\*l"*4&tAhMtl5t",1;4*-r\J;g AECD-DPB-1076 , ECD-DPB-llllz~1i, T-f~B i!.\'*-=f;J'4) · 0 lffl~~l04 lJ=-10 A 15 a , 1iiT ~ ~ §l ~ ;!f A ~ 1t)- ~ ~tr~ , ·Ht- Jt 3t *-1-K .~~, J:. rJJ % ~t r\J Z. itf ~t Jt ?Jr ;J:} ;fir zA 1: ~ #.i if- &B ii.\'*- =t ;J'4 , 1l ~ 104 if.-11 A M ~ lf~ it 0 §J 1:E-~ , ~ 105 if.-4 Jj Mt!1:E-PM2 ~~ r, r zPI 1 ft.,.¥_l.f. 0 1iiJ ~~~ 105 lf=-1 A M , ~ ~o ~ lf~i t 0 ~ Ml~ ~~iM.tt.•%~-,~A~~~~0~ztt•#+'~§l Gffl#;JifzA«~~¥&B~*•#,;JifM~•«0§J&g * It} aJ -if. k fi .t~ ~ i ~ DRAM la 00 , i; ;t I -1± k fi .t~ ~ 1~ ma 4 Exhibit 1 Page 4 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 5 of 29

;fl*~ ~ ~ 3t 0 ~ z t 1J ~ , E! 105 il=-1 A R-106 iJ=- 2 J=J 7 a E!p it- f!- t~ t%J ~ foj #Jr :ft. rr t%J ~ ~ ~JtA-r ;ft ~ z a JI:. , ~ ~ -!llt1 ~ , M~A«-~-&B~*•#·~~-~~~~,c~~~~ ;ft 111 ~ M: 1R. m1~ * w1tt z ii oo , 4 :l rw rr #Jr rr i& *- J11j ~ n. 63 Jt 65 7 1: t!p lftp it 0 ~ -nr ir , :1 rw rr #Jr rr i& rw ~+ ~ lij.. 57 Jt z lftp f. 0 g_j Fa b 12A/i& i ..::.. Ji& I& PM2 M 0 i: , 1-A Jf9p it 0 g_j FlT rlic.1t 3E t.; Ar-~ USB PORT ,f °*1 z 0 Jfl * tc. ~ it~~ ( E?p f1t :f:<:. ~ 1~ 4bJ ,1f. 4bJ J'o #~ Wt'. 34 FIT iG #J J'o ) tt 1pt. A it - jc., ii , JL ~{f B ~!.\ *- i" *-4 ~ t,jt­ R. PI 1 fh¥ 0 i: ~ 1l )fl 0 ~,£*~4~~~3t0~-~~•z•~~~fi•~~~, ~-~-~~0g_jffl~~£~~~j-#,~•mDAAM~OO~

¢ <) J'o+f%~P -l->R~1!lA%&J'o f ' .Jt.~105 i!=-1 , 2 AM ' /,fil_ ~ .., i:; ,.ff_ J .·, ,.. re LINE:i! 1fL.$k tt , ~ lf9p it 0 ~ r #Jr* t" 1tJi tl7 ·~ 1x• .z.M~M:••,~~-it0~~~:f.0~%~~•w~~ "$ ' 't .t-·ti ~-f j(, 14 ( de v i c e ) z A. ;t ' ~ ~ il! - ~ :ft f4JJ ii. ' £*~*;t#·R--it0~,ft~~M~M:~#~M*~• it It} g_) 0 £ 7)( ~ I§ ~I:.~ 10 5 ij:- 2 A ~ ' ~~ 1i. lf9p it 0 ~ :ft ~ t~ 0 ~ A. j- ~~ ri 3:.. ,f ~ ~ * ~ z tiJ t~ ' ti ;ti~ i" 1t ~ ~I:. ~?, ~ j' ~Jt0~·~a~~a:k.~~1&1~,'t~~••0~•~ , ~j)µ.. ~ jr ~ ~ 0 ;~~ 105 iJ:-3 A 25 a , £ 7](~ ~tf1Jlftp it 0 g_j FIT~ i!ziilpli!~o :t (Offer Letter) , ~i!~LINE:i! tit ~-%~M~M:~•,M~~§~MI*~~~-it0g_Jz Ill~~~ ' ~ ~ i!~LINE:i!1R. ..ktt~£ 7](~ 1tttlf9p t It}~~ 1fDAAMFIT ~ f1J z ti. 11itj- r.,, ~ 0 I 7)( ~ ~ 10 5 il=-4 J=J 5 8 foJ ~ ~ ~,c0~i.'ttllmt.;tt' i&~0~ M;tii., iT~lOS i!=-4 A 26 El ~fr~ ' "- ElA 1-0 lf~F ~ 1.t} 6J :flDRAM ia 00 bJf 1f ' ~ i1 *J" ff ' ~~~~,c0~~-·~~,~~§~8~-tf_·it~~~­ ~~~M*ffl~~.z.W~tt~M~,~;tl-t£:k.~~[&~Jfl & .-fl * ~ ~ ~ ,c ~ ~ z :t1J .@. , E! 10 5 1¥-4 A 16 a ~ R- M 1¥- 4 fl 23 a Jl: , ~Ii mJt?! 1£ ~ l~· ~ ,c 0 g_j £ f 1~~~ 11 it.z~ ~it 5 Exhibit 1 Page 5 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 6 of 29

, .ti~ 11 mtt -0- ~ i':'ie. 1t z -0- m• tc. ~ 1: ~~ c ~ .x.. Jhdt : 113 2 95 4 , 11 Jfl ;;;i- ~ i13- : KENNYW ' ~p f.{t * - F.IT iG 4h £ ) ' ~ A 'P& ~a•~~A~~~~•~afi,*itt-k~k~~~~ ,f • ;f~ ~ & ~ 111* ti , li\J $. ~ ,. ~DRAM la 00 z 7i ii;- , .ft ,1,tey- .. •*1. , -tttt z -t•#.iit- ( r~#C t•jiit- , 1t ~ ix. i ~ 931 ~) ,~M#~~M•~~ta,~~~c«•~••8~ J!-ti tt *tc. ~ t ~~ z USB fit~ ~ ( ~P Mt * ~ 1.t 4h 4 #J ifp #A«. 3 ?.IT iG 4h ifp ) , ~ ti~1i C 't • ji it- , ll 1. ;fJ $ ~ *' JI ffe. JG 0~a~~*'JG-0-~•~c1:•~•zttM,~~c«•~ •~•~iGffl~z•~~«a2~c~m•~am•~• 4h 4 4h £ fo.AJLt.6 z#J £) &Goog 1e Drive~~~ 1; ~Ji!~ C11*

i\ '5Ef. : brh5476@gma i 1. com) ' {wi i tJ. ¥ • Z7i i!-~1i *'I@*' (~ ( : ~-0-~z%•u~&§$*'@ffe.iG-0-~z·~M~- 0 ,:;~ e. (.'/ Ji_ .. £ 7)( ~ ~ 10 5 ~ 4 fa.J 28 E ~;J ;f.t llJp 't -0- ~ 1:E- ~ , ;}! 1:E- PM2 t~ ri :: r zDe Vi Ce -ii {1iq- f.@3!.1! ' ~p 7f( ~;J i! ;t ;J a {i § ¥ • ,ft. A~ 11 ,, t> z ~r:. ;t , -ti tt 11 m § G t.1T ~ z ri ;to911 -8 3 4 291 it « tt -t ~ ,. """ ( ~p f.ft *Ji_. 4h 4 fo.~ ~t 17 z 4h £ ) .. Jf9p 't -0- ~ ~e.1f z -0- .m * "tc. ~ 't ~; ( ~p Nt * Ji_ i;J. 4h 4 f~ ~ 18 z 4h J1o ) ' J!-ti ~~ ~ M~J ~ 'tf-1£-Google Drivet~~~}fl6Ji!~ ( 'l*it: brh5476@gmai 1. com ) fa1T1tt#zC «• jiit- , ~ r ~ ~ ~, ~ ~-0- ~ P.IT1R. Jfl z rDRAM"t~tt!Jt¥!'1 J t•jiit- ( 1t~ r [DR25nmS ] Temporary designrules Periphery Rev.06J '~1t: V90B/O.Design/ Design Rule, r{#DR25nmS tttt!JtJl~) a ~~«•~•,•~~fy~~*C~m•~~#•••~ c- 1 -2 5l 1t- .. Mt* 7' • 4h 4 4-bJ £ • it22z iL\ * ,r {13-D i~ * f#) ,~~~~-z1i**$~i~JG-0-~~~~M&• 0 M~ ~ 105 ~ 7 fa.J ~ 8 fa.J M z ~ El , ..E 7)( ~'*-/Jo~~~ PIT± .j~ zPM2 .g~ r, -¥- 't , ~ J.lt ~ ~ ~ z -t- .;R , ~-¥- 't ft -*.1! ~ PI2 [email protected].!~~ 1.t I -if. 'ttl i: ~ , if ~tttifff~~ttrff ~tlz F3 2 DRAM r tk tt JJt tN J {'JJ ~ 0 §1 lftF t -0- ~ :it!-!- ± -t- ,f !{ :t~ § 6 Exhibit 1 Page 6 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 7 of 29

~ ~ fl- ~ f.I ls II] 1\ 1- , ilAf DRAM-te1 nru ~ "ti tt * -t -fffr , i!ii PI 2 ;,.:;.. lftr 't 0 al a~ 65 *- * @fl- ~ f.I "ti tt ::t- -t -fffr ~ Ji -*" , R~ J! ~JJ ~ M.zDRAM-ttttJJlJt1J ~-1-z 'Cel 1 J , r Array J & r

Pe r i p he r y J ~ .k ~Jl JJ1] $-- it ' .£ 7](. ii ;pl ill ijt] ~ ~ft -f- {.R A ,$- it Cffl*tt~~~ftt$f·;~~--~)z~~ 0 ~-k~ ~.£*ii~~~~A~0al••~~·'*~~~z~~A ~0alW#A~~~~~*~~ff,~~1~*-~~~~ffl a -il ~ A ~ A jfj 0 al z ;t,J _@_ , -t- >R .£ 7](. ii 3f- ~ ~ ~!t A jfj 0 al z W*4 ( !:!p DR25nmS ti tt !JlJt1J ) , J4. lftr 1: 0 61 F32 DRAM ' ti tt !Ji J!1J J x 1i.. 1;t tt , ~ff~ ~ ~~ 5)--tJ!s tll , {; J:. A ~ A~/~ al zDRAM"ti tt !Ji J!1J z~ ;tit1a , J:j ~ g, 1-- ~ i:k J,.:). ii foJ .x.. ti§ .tit z ~f!-f- ft A~ -:tel ~ru ~ -t- $--it ' t,I1 !l/J 1c. ~ "ti tt !Ji J!1J t 'Ce 11 J 1 , r Arr a y J & Per i ph er y J ~ ~~ 5)-- ' ~ x ~ ~ * k -1: 00 o') ':I 0 •:> l') , i:;. 1! lf9p 1: 0 61 /Jo it 1c. ~ F3 2 DRAM "ti tt JJL J! 1J 01 Z- .£ 7](. ii -ii '.') ,;> • ··~ l.J. ,, ~~~kiMJffiffe~z2~3 s01,~•~0al-tB~aa ,.. 0 .-. I 1 r lX/~ X&@ ~ I C"ti tt :}Ji J!1J ~ ~ , §1 1t M ;J:f Ce 11 J , Ar ray J & ' Pe r i p her y J ;#'~ 1ir. , ~ lf~p 't 0 al z +~~"ti tt !fl J!1J ;t ~ jl\-*" J:.. ' 3f- .~~, DR25nmS "ti tt /fl J!1J ' J:j J:. 'width J

1 1 , space J *- 1-- it ' ill it '.fl ~ it ;}}t ~Jr :l:f & 1} ?.t ' ~ ~ff ~ 1! Jfl J•J DR25nmS "ti tt !Ji ~1 t~ 5)-- *-it z ii\-*" 1; wi x 1t T ~ * k , ~ * k }l1J ~ff~ *- jl\-*-** x r ~ ii 11 , ~ 01t ~ ii 1.t J4. .£ 7](. ii ~ tt , ~ ~o ·tt z ~ ii 1.t & PI 2 1- f.I BiJi * ~ it IN 11:c. J4. .£ 7](. ~ -tt tt 1 1 Jfij 1: ~ al F3 2 DRAM "ti tt /Ji }lJz *-it~ ~ lt & * ~ "*-tl m , 1!. ifrJ 1c. ;ix. Jfgp 't 0 al F3 2 DRAM"t~ tt #t J!1J O lftp 't 0 a] Jffi ~ "ti I 3t ,aJ r it !Ji ( mask t ape -out ) & • -f- *A A l--t A.. Ji , 1* .£ 7](. ~ ~ 1~ DR25nmS ti tt #i ~1J ~ f.¥_ $-it -t ~9P 1: 0 ~ 11 , PI 2 MJ 1t F32 DRAM"titt}flJl 1J B~' ~Pi!1flljU&l~~~;J!f-ti1i}k, i!kt•J

1 & ; 7t *° i&1 *£ , 112 11 A B~ M1tJff "ti tt !fl J! ] ~ ~ , x mls J4 1& it ffi1t ~ il! 1t r - f~ -¥1 :l fN. , itf-11& t-L 11 ti it ,JL Jl1J tfr ,m; ;ft f z ~M,~a,~•&A..hJix.-*",1*•$1N1-~•m~h, 7 Exhibit 1 Page 7 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 8 of 29

~106 it--1 AM: ft-Device$&.J!. 0 ~'~~~~%§]~£~~--~,-~~~~~,-~£~~ iffe ~ :fi m:t ~ C 't tit f.i Mfe , ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 §J. , ~ jf k ~ 0 ~ I§ il:c fa] it-: t! t~ #Jr :ll:i rr 1%1 ~ ht~ tl:l % 1]f ' .it~ ill FM *- - rn- 7F z f­ ~ ~ « - ~ ~ # o *~ ~ - 'g --~, faJ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ * ~ *tttt £ 7](.~rn-=t~ mz ri Jt0911-834291 r, 3Jt 1:1t~JtAti!1tt ~ .Ji tit , .it.t~ .-lf ik;Jti~ #Jr :Il:i rr 1%1 ~ ~ 1%1 ~ 't ~ 106 it--2 A 7 s,~~~~t~~*~~•z~*~,i~m*~~~ ffl7FZ~~~fi~ffe~*'.IE~ffM*-~~~ffl7FZ~£ 0 ·tiE-iktti~ #Jr :ll:i rpt%] ~ ~ 1%] ~ 'g ~ 106 it--2 A 7 8 14St 10~-tt , ~ ~ i*3 rr #Jrrp I& i*3 # -=-~57JtZJf9P it% aJ Fabl 2A i.i ~ ~

i.i I& ~ -ft :ft ~ st , lzsl Jf~t 't 0 aJ ti ~ ri ~ rf i1 , 4 lftt 't 0 aJ -3'.c- Q ,, , ,~, ,·: ~ t~ 1 ,f .ti~ ~ il ~ A. Fi ~ T ~tl tt PM2 i~ r, , ~ st MJf9p t 0 §J "' " ,; •. ,, <:?• e <;, A. t- t~ [email protected] A ~ :k. , .tt t%1 ;tt; n~ ~f tt £ 7]( ~ hit 1iL ~ 1t:it ~ - * ::d / ,,

r, Jt +#l ' j&.ltr01 £7](~ t~ +#l r ti ' £ 7](~~~i1i~ J:.1f- ~-=r ~ •; •~~ M X, &~• t % §J £ /f A. R ~ ~-·* • iiEI -t- >R J:t- .iL ~P ~ @J ~ 0 i: , ; :t iiEI ~~lo 5 it- 2 A 7 s 15 B~25£-tti!8.WM0'.£:, .iExtl:lt~r,!Lt0911-834291 F1!Ltz-f

;tt; ~1%1 ~ 'g .fo ;ff o -c , ,iij~ ~&. '*- ~ .tt. -g ~ 106 it- 2 A 8 8 J:A 1~ A.~ ~ -m M1PJ ~ ~ , ~~~~~B~illm*-cffl~~£~~~'g~#,;•~$ .3:. J/J ~ 10 6 it-2 A 9 8 ~ ill Wt * ~ ?'1" 7F 4h J'o 1# '*- ~ ~ • 'g .fo 8 Exhibit 1 Page 8 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 9 of 29

-tf O £ 7)( ~ $--106 iJ=- 2 JJ 7 EJ 18 EJ .ti i§: tFaJ ~ 't t{iJ M&At~ 'tmM~,~ili~*•T~#~,*~~~'t-~i~-~ =-f *4 , -P3- {§ ~ i:k ft ~~ ~Jr :le. rlf 1%} ~ J}t. 1%} ~ 't ~t '.I: )it '.I: t !~ 1i i:k ft£. ti 1f z tll '#; ~ • ~ 10 6 iJ=- 2 JJ 14 EJ 1 fit ;fz /~ , iL PIT ~ l:e. ls ~ff~'t·~~~™*A,JLffl~~£:x•~~*~~~ ,1m*+m~~~~ff~it,b~~™*+m~~£ 0 A,~~~M~~0~,A~A~0~~ili%~(4~tt%&% ~ff~~m*+~m~) ·~&•~0~~ili%*C4~tt %&%*M~~m*+~ffl~) ·~*~~~'tffi~*•# tFaJ ~ }aj #Jr :rt rr tFaJ ~ 1k tFaJ ~ 1t tFaJ ~ 11 , mti 1k ti *- 1~ ~ 0 ~i" -tt Ji PIT ie, ii: {f

0 { ) - , t.i ~ie, * l= T PIT~! zti--tt : ( - ) 1#i!ti-;Jt :

,;.. 0 ~ } ,,: 1 . tt % 1oJ ~ ~ $-- 106 iJ=- 2 JJ 14 EJ tffl ~ 't t~ P01 1# C4 J{ .;", ,·:; ~:, i) at z * ( ,., 2-54) ; $--106 iJ=- 2 JJ 15 EJ , 106 ~6 JJ 9 EJ {rk ~ 't 1ffet 1fl ;;) ,.·., af z1# * (C4 J: 78-87 , A44 J: 87-91) 0 2 . ~Et%£ 7jc_ ~ $--106 ~ 2 }J 7 8 , 106 ~ 2 J3 14 8 tfa] ~ 't t~ M at z 1# * (B4 J{ 4- 27 , 115 - 13 5) ; $--106 ~ 2 JJ 8 8 , 10 6 iJ=- 2 }J 15 8 tfk ~ 'g 1~ 1fl Bf Z 1# jzl£ & J!- jt 1! ~.t t~ ( B% J{ 92-107, 243-252 ) : $--106 iJ=-6 JJ9 att~'t{~tflsfz

1#*(B~ J 92-107 , B 4 J 243-252 , A44 J{ 83-91) 0 3. it%~~~ $--106 ~ 2 JJ 14 8 1%] ~ 't t{iJ F01 af z 1# * (D 4 J{ 5- 25) ; $--106 iJ=-2 JJ 15 8 , 106 ~6 JJ 15 EJ {rk ~ 't 1ffet 1fl Bf z 1# Ml ( D4 J{ 41 -55 ' 115 -12 5 ) 0 4. it %~fp ~ 0 §J z1\J!. .A.i:tl ~ ?tAt t;p $--106 ~3 JJ 14 8 tfaJ ~ 'it~ M atz~!Mi(A5 4 Jr 14-24 ) 0 5 . M ~ii% ; t" i~ $--106 .i¥- 2 JJ 7 a tFaJ ~ 't t{iJ r.,, at z 1# it c E 4 J{ 5-12) ; $-- l 06 .+ 2 JJ 8 8 , 106 ~ 2 JJ 9 EJ ,

10 6 .fJ=- 6 }j 15 8 ~ ~ 'g 1Jl 1fl B} Z 1# jzl£ ( E .,g.. J{ 73 -75 ) 0 6. %1Jf'1\J!. .A. &p ~ ~~~ ~ ;1c 0 §J ii:[email protected]!. ft~ If $--105 ~8 A 9 Exhibit 1 Page 9 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 10 of 29

18 El , 10 5 ~ 9 JJ 1 El tfoJ ~ 'i t{Q M at z Ft.. Mi ( A1 % J{ 13 2 -14 7 ) ; J-A "Wi A.~ ~ ~ 10 6 ~ 2 JJ 13 El ifft ~ 'g 1j 1ft at Z ti

t~ ( A2~ J{ 186-187 ) 0 7. *A.E!p~~~1t~alik~-&David Alford Ashmore~105 lJ=-9 JJ 1 s , 105 lJ=-12JJ 14 s tft'l~ 'i11iJ M a{fzF!MiCAl % Jl149-154 '316-321) 0 8 . * A. E!p ~ ~ ~ 1t ~ al 'i 1"fl. 4i: 1::- ~~ ri A. ~ J . R . Tiet sort ~ 10 5 lJ=- 9 JJ 1 s tfoJ ~ 'i 11iJ M at z Ft.. Mi ( A1 % J{ 15 5 - 16 3 ) 0 9. "Wi A. !!p ~ ~ ~ 7t ~ a] .:L ;f.I flip Luci en t Jan ~ 105 lJ=-11 JJ 22 El , 10 6 lJ=- 2 JJ 16 El 1'°1 ~ ¥ t{Q M a{f z ft Mi ( A1 % Jl 26 7 -27 4 , A2%Ji331-336) 0

(,, 10 At% 1tiJ ~ ~ ~ l 06 lJ=- 2 JJ 7 s J,A ti-A.~ ~ ;Ji ~ 1'°1 ~ 1g t~ M ( ' f , !) ( · zftMi ( Al 4 Ji 341-353) ; ~ 106 1¥--2 JJ 8 El J:A "Wi A.~~ .ti ~ti~ 'i 1"fl. M z -WitaJ (Al 4 Ji 357-365) 0 11. -W.t A. E!p ~9P 1: 1t} ~ m*4- Ji!i-. I& .4- ~ j£ l.! i~ 1* -klllr ~ 10 6 1¥- 2 JJ 8

El 1'°1 ~ ¥ t~ r0i B{f z Ft 1lli ( A1 4 Ji 36 8 -37 8 ) ; ~ 10 6 ~ 2 JJ 8 El ti ~ 1g 1j 1ft a{f z ti-taJ ( A14 Ji 38 3 -38 5 ) 0 12 . -wt A. E!p ~9P 1: 1t} ~ 'i i* ii1J ~t j£ l.! Ft iE. J' ~ 106 1¥-- 2 JJ 8 a tfoJ ~ 1g 11iJ r0i at z Ft Mi ( A1 4 Ji 38 7 -39 3 ) ; ~ 10 6 1¥- 2 JJ 8 El ti ~ ¥ 1j 1"fl. a{f z -Wi ta] ( A14 Ji 39 6 -401 ) 0 13.-¥.tA.!!p ~5~'~1t~~ ~f1.tt,g.-~~t&.r1.i#1a ~~106 ~2 JJ 7 El 1'°1 ~ 1g t{Q F"1 a{f z Ft Mi ( A2 % Ji l -7 ) 0 14 . ti-A. E!p ~ 5!~ ~ 1t ~ ~ ~ t1. !t,g.- ~~ ~ -& tM 3C. i-i- ~ 1O 6 iJ:- 2 JJ 7 s tfoJ ~ 'i tiiJ r"i at z ft Mi ( A2 ,4 Ji 11 -19 ) 0 15. ti-A. E!p ~ 5' ~ 1t ~ ~ ~ ;f1. -!it%~~ .:L ;f1. flip *t :fJ ~ ~ 106 1¥-2 JJ'7 a tft'l~ 'it1iJ M atzFtJ!(A2 % J:74-82) 0 16 . -Wi A. !!p ~ 5f ~ 1t ~ ~ &p at M F~ ~ i:JT ~~ ~£ l.! F! 1e. ~ ~ l O6 1¥-- 2 JJ 7 s , 106 1¥-2 JJ 13 EJ tfoJ ~ 'it1iJ M atzf!i!(A2 ~ Ji 85-93 , 118-124); ~106 iJ:-2 JJ 13S, 106 ~5 A25El

ti~ 'i 1.~ 1"fl. atz*1"aJ CA2~ Ji 182-187 , 383-387) 0 1 0 Exhibit 1 Page 10 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 11 of 29

17. -Wk A ~p ~ lit·~ f6 0- aJ PROVERt~ ~ it'tf ..:r.. fj_ giJi tt ~ ~ ~ 106 if=- 2 A 7 8 1ft] ~ 1g 1~ M a} z Ft Mi ( A2 J©. Ji 95 - 101 ) 0 18 . -Wk A ~p ~ lf· I.ii #I ¥t f-4 J1i 1$)-* Hl 1;;- 6J i: :;: -& ~ ,,t Fi ~ 10 6 if=- 2 A 7 8 1ft] ~ 1g t~ Peri a} z Ft Mi ( A2 J©. Ji 10 3 - 10 7 ) 0 19 . -rt A f!p ~ jt· ~; ~i fl-.ti J1i 153'" * fll 1;;- aJ j,*1 ~ 3:. tt 1~ ~ 10 6 if=- 2 A 13 8 "tft]-W '§1~ rcr,a}zFJft.Mi(A2 J©.108-111); ~106 if=-2

A 13 a .ti ~ ¥ 1n. r0i at z tfl--taJ CA2 J©. Ji 113 - 116 ) 0 20 . -rt A E!p Jf~p it It} 6J ~ fj_ tl %- ..:r.. fj_ g;p * ~ *~ 10 6 if=- 2 A 14 8 tftJ~¥1fiJMa}zFtMi(A2 J©.Jl230-241); ~106 if=-2 A 15 a .ti~ 1g 1Jl 1ft a} z t~ 161 CA2 J©. Ji 314 - 319 ) 0 21 . -rk A.. ~P Jf9p it 1;;- aJ z ~ fj_ 1f % .:::... .g~ ft.£ J.t it~ tt ~ 10 6 ~ 2 A 14 s tFaJ ~ 1g-tfiJ M a}zFJft1t(A2 % Jl248-264) : ~106 if=-2

A 15 E3 {ft~ 'g 1ft rcr, B;J-z ~i"ta] CA2J©. Ji 320- 326) 0

>.) C.::.) 4F 1~ Mi-Wiit : ,::, ,, ,., .::, 1. ~ 5~ ~ f6 0- aJ z 0- aJ ~ tr. t- 7ft ( A1 J©. Ji 17 ) 0 1 2 . ~ 5, ~ it 0- aJ -mtt( 1* ~ &. 9'Ef ~ ffil-t Ji i;-- ~~ J 1 10" ( A1 % Ji 18-26) 0 I 1 3. ~ j' ~ ,c1;;-aJ flJ ~~ ft +-mt J PIT~ f! t& t-1n.z1* T J (Al%Jl32-36) 0

4. ~ 5~ ~ ,c 1t} aJ z1-11 J..,J!1J ( Al % Ji 37-41) 0 5. ~ 5if ~ ,If/t} aJ ~ 105 if=-4 A 20 E3 1t~ z 11 A.. 1: n~ USB f-Jt Jt~tfi. CAlf©. Ji 54-56) 0 6 . t:t 5~ ~ ,c 0- aJ ft 1- M 5i 1: n~ 1~ ]jJi ~ pq Ji, ~ t- ~ :f~ t& 1: ~ fc. i! PIT it ill JJtz ¥-t~ (Al% Ji 57) 0 7 . it% J:. 7j( ~ ~ 10 5 if=- 4 A 5 E3 foJ t:t j!Jt· ~ f6 0- aJ ~ tl:l z ~ - tj:Jtt-'~*-CAl ~Ji73-74) 0 8 . it%.£ 7]( ~ § 10 5 if=- 3 A 20 E3 _f_ 4 A 26 8 -1±- ~ 5~ ~ :JC It} 6] z tB lb & ri ~ J 1J -t jii-i t-*4 CA 1 J©. Ji 78 - 81 ) 0 9. ~%1*~~mm*-M**~~1:az~~-~~~c Alf©.Jl83-97) 0 1 1 Exhibit 1 Page 11 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 12 of 29

1o.;ti%17)(.~~ ~?ft'~ 7'6 1.t} ~ 1it 103 if-2 J:J 26 El 11-11-z I lft 1fti it-- j~ ~ 1i fl & 9°if g Jit A. 1;- j~ J ~ * CAl J®.. Ji 104-120) 0 11 . ~i % J:. 7]( .i.i 1±- f;- j~ *' Jt 0 ~ 1:1- ~ ;!tJ} M ~ ~ 1f 1,11 i*C~G it ( A1 J®..Ji 122-126) 0 12 . ;ti% 1 7)(. ~ iit 1o 5 if-4 J:J 26 El faJ ~ lt ~ 7'6 0 ~ ~ tl:l z WF ~ 5FaJi (Al J®.. Ji 127-131) 0 13. ~@ ~ 7'6 -0- aJ ff aJi :ti% ..:E. 7)(.~ .t-Y- ~ .iE.1; -Ji ik Ffr Jf:it1f z 1:~ titfzffl~ (AlJ®..Jil86-198, A3J®..Ji325-492) 0 14. ~@ ~ 7'6-0- aJ a~ 5*' ~ 3'c/.t} 611it 103 if-2 J:J 28 El 1fir z MTI/MMT Design Engineering Services Ag reementl155(Al ]®.. Ji 206- 216) ' ~ ~ ~ 7t 1.t} 61 ~ #Jr ,7]1111{ ~ 7t ,0- a] }it 100 ip. 9 J:J 2 El 1}1rzMSA/MTI Front-end Manufacturing Supply Agreement~* (Al%Jf217-231 ) '#.Jy/JaJ,t~7'6 -0-61~~5!~~7'6-0-611*103 ip-2 J:J 28El 1flfzFoundry ;, . { :, c::, f':) ,;_., t

0 Agreement~* (A1J®..Jf233-252) " f .'! 15 . ~ @ ~ 7'6 -0- §J ft 1it :ti% 1 7)(. ~ Pfr ffl Nt * -Pfr iF *"te. ~ it ~~ f, • "' " z1tt1r:tll.%(A3 J®..Ji511-528) 0 16 . ~It% 1 7)(. ii , 1'1" Jt ~ z #- 1..1i ~ ;tlt 1* ~ A...tl 1i 'i *-4 * (A 3 J®..Jf536-537) 0 17. ik~.gr 1~ ~ NJ 105 if:-1 oJ:J s s 1~ =t 1E- ~ 11; 10514003270 !Jt &t ffr ltft4Eitl:tll. % ( A3J®.. Ji 543-544) 0 18. ik~.g~ "t~ ~ NJ 106 if-2 J:J 23 El 1~ 'i 1.li ~ 11; 10614505100 !t &, FlT ltft4Ef~:ta % (A3% Jf 570-573) 0 19 .1i % 1 7)(. ~ rfr m1; ~ ,;1_ ~ zit ~ m- ~ cA3 4 Jf 57 6 -6 78) 0 2 0 . fa.& i1t .g~ .tl 'i ~ tl 4?:- l 1t FIT it Mt z lf9p 1: -0- aJ 'f lt ~ %- * ~ §J 1k. *;Ji>fiiq1;-1t ~±~ ~7"4~;.t..(A3 ~ Jr 682- 725) 0 21. :ti%_£ 7](.~1! mLINEi@. *-'kttz!f tt jii! (A3 % Jt 790-91

2) 0 22. ~5t~·~7'6 1.t}aJ1*105 if-4 J:J 198 ~i!~;tlt%1iiJJt~ziilli3C.

( A2J®.. 1t 191-192) 0 1 2 Exhibit 1 Page 12 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 13 of 29

23.~5!?A;'c~aJ~l03 .if=-2 A24S~1.t%1i>J~~P}Tft,IZ 1 1P}1$. % i.:{J ~{i $ & 9'J ~ 5!t A_% t-0 J ~4'-(A2 4 Ji 193-200

'210-218 ) 0 24. ~~,A Jt~ aJ PlT W#z~.t%1i>J~~A.l= W*4-+~-*- ( A24 Ji 203) 0 25. ~la~ aJ ~i.t%1aJ"~~~~z$1$.%i~ •tt4'-(A2 4 ~20 4-206) 0 26 . it-~%-~~ tfo] ~ '°1 #Jr :It rr 1fo] ~ 1k l 06 if=- 2 Ji 7 S ~ it.:it#- Jf9p « ~ aJ £ 7)( ~ ~ /t} '.£ Ji 1ft JJi):i tll % ( E4 Ji 16-17 ) 0 27. f1t :& - .z.fo ;jf *°if- ( Al 4 Ji 176-178 z l ) , fft :& .=..z;ft #- .fo ;jf *° if ( F 1 4 ~ 31 - 3 4 ) , Nt :& -=- z .:it #- .f o ;tip *° iffe ( F 1 ·") 4 Ji 4 7 -49 ) , Nt :& mi z.:Jt #- ;}a ;tf *° if ( F1 4 Ji 24-26) , (),, " fft :& .li. z.tt #- .fo ;tip*° if ( F2 4 Ji 30-33 ) , fH :& 7' z;}o ;tf *°ii(E4Ji67-68) ·, fN:&--c.z.fo;jf*°iffe(C4Ji96-99), f1t :& /\._z;Jt #- .fo ;jip *°if (F4 4 Ji 26-29 ) , Nt :& )Lz;Jt #­ .fa ;jf *°if (F3 4 Ji 23-27 ) , Nt :& + z.ft #- .fo ;jf *°iffe (F3 ., " % 28-31 ) 0 {) '~· (I .J (,> Ji .,•:) 28 . .fo {f 4bJ a°o .~, ~ (A4 % Ji 53-75) 0 29. f{;j *-. - 1 ~.j :& + z.fo {If 4bJ a°o 0 .=.., ft~-*-*.z.*1~: C-)~~zk~•~,ffi~~~fiA~~*~z*~~~•~ N~A-,~~M-~ft~=--~...tz*~M*~**'~ -!t- ,'t- ~ A;Ji A~~ *1t APIT 1f ~ , Jl1J ~ it-~ PlT jj z *i l'J 1 :tt ,~AA~~$A.,~~~~~-!t-~.z.A-~$A.~•~ ~ Pf ' i!:l:i ~ l: ~ it- Ff{, 3 0 if=- ...t + i 3 416 !ct J1J1?fcf 1~ ,i. ~ 0 4'­ ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~, £ ~ ~ M~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ tt, ~ mAi A~ ~aJ~~~~~AJt~~,ft;fi~~AJt~§Jffl~ffl,~ ~•~w~Aiz~*,tt•,••,a~zj-~,u~ •~~~«•~•~~-#~~~~Jt~aJz•~~-~ ~z«a~aa~,;j~~~•*•3•J1~,1~M 1 3 Exhibit 1 Page 13 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 14 of 29

~Az~~,~l*•~@*J2*ffl~Az*•~m 0 ,~z,~~~~0~A~•«•~•zffl~A'@~~ }61} ~ J!1JAtJ~ ~ 1:ztjii!:t.lf. t!i ~ A. ( ~ i!- i 966 11! i l :i:Ji !Ji~ *- ~R ) , ti~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ , @ j' ~ ~ 0 ~ :rJG _I:_ r~ « -~-~*~z~~··,~~~ili%~o~~-«1}~ Jj ~ 10 6 + 2 ~ 2 3 E ;#l t±l r -Jf1 • %1Jf Ml J , .t~ {i ~! %£ 7]( •$•«1}~~--M,~~-«0~m~*~ffl@~~ jfj 0 ~ z *. t~ f& ' 1.8 ltsJ lfip « 0 ~ ~_;}f J:_ P~ «. tiiffe ZPIT ~A.&·6~A,~~rM·%~*J·~-A~;#lili% 1t 0 c~)•~•*~*•~r&*ffl~•*ArW~J ,~&Wmk

f ~~-~wa,~~-~--4AMaz-&,*«~t t.'.·, f - 0 z~1l WtR.-fr A , ~t~t4 =f 1R.J!t a;t:iLt•J ~z1i ~ 0 11 -Jt 1J it c.. e (.") i 1ONF-· i 6 :i:Ji PIT ~ A z ~ • ~i if ' .t~ tJ. 1: -f- , • •ri ' jfj ~ :: ~··· c, i:;, i;~ '·. ~~~~-z~~ffl-4'm~«B£ffz~•,«*~ n 1'.• iffe ® qf Jr ft J!t A. ' J!. ~ ~ vJ" ~ ttl ' ~ ff *.t j: ~ - !!. t~ 1t ;yJG (, '""" ~ffl~$z#tt,~•~•~•*~*•~•*ffl~Wz -g_ ~ a1l _=:!:.. ~ T:al .:ir- h:-. -1·~ tfo ..t.a d: -l-:1.. -I: ->-r. fr.'< Im'" -r-* ~ c.!t.. _,, /.- -lli ~ iil \i ' jt J ./J'--1.x. I "J .~ ~ 1-l '1"-1- .!P;J~ ""-1T ~ ' ~~ffl~A~*W~*•~•a~~ztt~,~~*~~ PIT ~ A r Wtfl ag l-;I •ti ~ -M~ 1tt. •ti1! mJ ( ex c 1us iv e use of information) &~jf&;z~'51t1Jt1.t (monopoly value) ,~J~M_i__I:_~~z~~ 0 ~%M~~,£*•i~~ ~A~0~zR*W+~•t0~~-~,~~~~~~ ~Ajfj0~ffl~z*•~f&'A~¥*•~-~M~M~ If9P 1: 1} ~ Mj 1fDRAMA £ fir Ji& ! 1J z M~ ' mIf9p 1: 0 ~ r~ 1f 1c: ~z~*'ft~,-a,ttt,A~~8#~~~~~z i•0~:x$~~*-~~MTft~*~«•~•,~a T~-~~lt%T,1&~-~~-~~~,-~~~~ ~ 1#lf9P 1: 0 ~ F32 DRAM-ti tt /JlY!1J p\:J z r Ce 11 J ' r Array J & rPeriphery J ~*-it, ~l:.!&_~sz:A.LUCIENT JAN 7ft 1 4 Exhibit 1 Page 14 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 15 of 29

106 if:- 2 J1 16 E1 t~ ~ 'i "tfi] ro, B}t1t ~ aA kt , iii!% A* ~4~ 105 if:-7 J1 ~8 J1 Mz~ E1 , -t->i<.i;B~.tiDevice{wr,1:r• zit% .:£7j(~ , t,l1#1&ttJtJN ~tiM;-~~tt- , it%A *-"-­ ~-~- aA ~~%.:£ *~ffl#~ z W~~ ~ ~~~*~% tlf A~ jf ~ :1t 0 61 lp{.if C nM ~ i1:t:.w.i!i , 1:t t~ ~ 'i ~ 106 if:-2 A 7 E1 ~ lf9p t 0 61 PM2 t~ ri -tt 't ~tl , it% A * k w% *o it %.:£*"'M~~8~~·ffl#~z.%~A.~~~:1t06J W# 1 ~~«*t1taA) 0 ~~,~%~~~,1*~~~ ~t~•~•lp{.*~n•••ffl~z«•~•a~*,g ~Rk~*fflA.~~z.ffl,~&~%A*~~~~tM• Rk-t-~#~~~%.:£*~**•~•t06Jffl~~~~ fl1JF3 2 DRAMtt tt JJt J!1J 1JJ ~ z. ;f; Ji. • ·ft jp , iE. ~ ~ i* 0 it% () e-., ~~~,1*~'A*~~•~~$%~A.~~A:1t06J

1 I) t 1:fui. , -1±- *-- ~i i1!!. i& 1t m%-tJF A~~~ :1t 0 61 #-t~ • z. ;f; •> I': D b *

~ 0 ( -=- ) lJ * #- ;f~ $ ik i l 31r} z. 4 18 t" ?Jr ti : 1 * A. z.1\ * A. .sx. gi ~A.W~~nz.*~'~&hA~kffAJ ,ffl.E&h A~kffA,~*~~ttoc,ffAAE~·~h, '~~ J£~~kz~•,~rtt•~~~k~*ffA,~~~ ~ttz.ffA~~ 0 *#~%•t06J•~ili~%M~~, .:£*~'-fX.•~~~-~ffl.~z.--~~-~*'~~ 1 1 t,1' ft W*4 , iE. * iF tt ~ 6J fl -l!itl 1t ffl USB PORT , ~1f *° t ~ *~~U06JR#~~,ffl~t1taAU3A.~-~~~~~ ff~i-~z.-•W#*~M;--t06J,A.t06J~fi ~3.A.f~~-M~-z.~~--,~~~lp{.~~fuA.* ~~~~A~~~ 0 **~~~~~•~~*~#~'* JJl 1± lf~ t 0 61 PI 2 M0 '.i: R , # ~ 1! %.:£ 7j( ~ , 1aJ ~ ~ gi %~A.~~~:1t06lffl~~z.~~t-~•&~*'A~ %1*•'~~~~•t06J~••,~#-~~~m~ •• fil,~Ji.~%.t061Rk.~%~~~,.:£*"' 1 5 Exhibit 1 Page 15 ,/'£ - Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 16 of 29

~ * ~ 1}1r {/i1J i( z~1t ~ i~ • , 3i -Jr ~t• ~~ ti 1f 1J1I tt , ifiJ ~~*'*~-~~~~~~k~$fuA*~~~Zff~( -~~~,4~%.~0~M~tt~z.ffl,~~M~H Jf 1ft. j-.i ~ .wt ) , ti ~Ji% lf9P 1: 0 aJ PlT A!~ M , i%1 li! -ti~ 0 -=- , f}T ~P., * 1'* : (-)~%~~~~~1±A~~l&~ffl&ffi$%~A~-~~0 ~ z;t1J dii , ;f~1f %tlf AA• A ~0 aJ * •t!ib~ , i&.%1Jf A t~A~0al*~-~~,Mtt•,~A~~,Mtt~* -~~'~ITTJ-~~-~OOITTJ~ffl~*•~~,~~•• t~ ~ * i 13 fil z 2 i 1 JJii z t: ~ -t£ * ft ie. r& 1t mmJ 1e. ~ * i 13 fil z 1 i 1 Jji i 2 #J: ' i 3 #k z #- -1tAft O ~Ji% 1iiJ ~ ~ J:)_

0 i;, •-~;t,~4AiM~ff,.-~-#- X%~RmA (, f ' 3..1.::. ~ 4t giji '* ~ 10 6 4:- 2 A 13 8 1~ 1ft. B} , *- iF ~Ji% 1iiI ~ ~ i MJ fr A 1J' ~t ~e. ,M ik i 3s 9 1* z ~ ti~ 1t fu A 1: h~ jG it-ii :': . (• t> t, ( • L 1.. ;fl $ #- -Mft ' •Ht tfi: A fi {e. ~ ~ 10 6 4:- 2 Jj 13 8 1Jl 1ft B} ~.i: ;l,i. 0 ~·0

~%~~~~~~-%~At~A~0aJMM, r-~J ~1-Jti 0 a) z 'th~jt>i! 0 (~)~%1~~~~-t£A~~I&~ffl&ffi$%~AA•A~0 aJ z::f1 Jz1 , ti 1§1 "i: ~&iA ~ iE..~*~1t * •t~~ ,M at1x $%~AA•~~0aJz*ffMA-C'~~·-~-~~ mJ 1l ffl , i% 5kfu ' 1! JP., ,f- • t~. * i 131'* z 2 i 1 Jj z ~ ~ -t£ A fi !e. I& 1l ffl mJ Je, M* i l 311l z 1 i 1 JJii i 1 #J: , * 11 C ik i 91 fii i 1 Jj z ~ 1§1 iA I~ z ~ ik 1x $ fu A z f-1'F ~t

11 .:;t -lvt fr!< = ~ 0 '~ ,1. -r ' /;h tt -cA. " X .:iL- , 1 -t:sr. ,.:i:.. L- * 8 f_j;_ lf1£ ~ ~F- ~-- 1a ~ ..:r::.. 7]( ~ .$ /J~- JfL - -1e. ,f,1 ' JA - -r~ ~ 1T ~ 1°J B} ~ JP., L Mtt #- ,t ' A ~ 1i Mt% JP., ' it* -Jf1J * i 55 {ii 11l k. ',1;t-"i:t®'J-A,f-~;f~J&;ikil3filz2 i1 :i:Jiiz#- 0 %1JFA t~A~0aJ,A•A~0aJ'*•A~%i~~M~~~ -Jf 1Jik i 31 7 fil Z i% ikfu ~ fjJ- J:. ~o ~ .:r.. ?,fj ;f~ • #- ' :1f1Jik i 3 18 1 6, Exhibit 1 Page 16 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 17 of 29

1ri z 1 z )lj)~ ;f:1 ffl 't )j~ *a ~ z 1-tt. A f~ ~ * , -Jf1J ik i 34 2 11i i 1 :rj z ~t.1t ' -Jf1Jik i 3 5 9 {i} Z ~ ii }pl 1-f 1~ A 1[ • f.;c, it Jl 1-~; ~ :{f *~ , ,tt*-f f~~ **102 .+1 A 31 a tw1r/~~ i 13 +-* z 1 .f. 13 +-* z 4 *1 1i 5( , * .:rr. ,t-- J.t re ;(f. ~ -Jt1J Ik i 31 7 1ri ' i 318 1ri Z 1 ' i 318 1ri Z 2 ' i 34 2 {ri ' j 3 59 11i * JJt ~ lt ~ ,f- -f f~ ~ 1if- ti* PIT .:f Jt. , ~ -r r;_ Jig -tr ( .n:. * ~fc. is 4 i 2 -t ,j i 14;:x_ 1ttttt • nm 1~ 5( :t '*- ,iw,) , Jt.~i~*-f~~*z~~*5C.'~iMM**5C.z~m *'*~m*~~•~*z~fl~,~-~m*-f~~*o x~%.£*•~~~t~~~*••tt*t*H~z#* •~,~~~~•~ff~~~*-~**~fy~%A•k M~~~*·~-~M~~~,x&*~•~•~~t, tt 1«-t'.i A 1if- ti * i l 41ri j 1 :rJt JJt ;t ' :¥JG it% .£ 7}(.. PIT jffe * -ff~~ i 13 {ii z 2 i 1 J:j z * ' ;~ ff ~ St f;t- .j+-]f1j 0 ,. (• ... (J 0 * (~)~%~-kt~;(f.*~~~~ffl&.$%-~A~~~~~ ~ z ;f;rJ ~ , ~ *a :ft% .£ 7j(_ • .PIT -i~ * z ,f- -f t~ ~ r;_ ~ .iE. -Ji * \> ,, PIT lpl tf ' 17J 1! ffl z ' 1~ Je, * -f ~ ~ ik i 131ri z 2 i 1 :rj z t ~ ;(f. * ~i i~ i& 1i m , mJ 1e. ~ * i 1311i z 1 i 1 :rJt i 4 #x z.fp.*to (~)~%mt~~z~~Afy~%~~~,.£*•'A**' ~ :¥Jt. -fr -t ~ , 1e. * -t t~ ~ ,t-- i 13 +i z 2 i 1 lJt z * , tt 1«­ * -t f~ ~ ik i 13 {i} z 4 R~ -r~ Jl ~ , tt f&. % ~ti 'it ~ ~ ff ~ ik i l 3{ri -Z..2 i 1 :rjt z-fri ~-Jf1 ° tm ' i.l~t : ~%~~~~~#-MlplffzA«•~•aB~*•#,~& ~%£~~~~~ffl~~zc-t-~•an~*f#,~* -Jf1Ji'!- i 3 81ii z l 1it 1 Jjt R~ $~ Jl ~ , w % i.l ~:t O f1t *- ..::.. , Mt *- ~ P.ti~Ah Jf 4h a°a fa." !t 3 , 6 , Mt -tz ~ P.,J. 4h 4 4h a°a '~" !t 16 , Mt -tz 7' P.' 4h 4 4h u°a fa." !Cf. 20 PIT ~ 4h u°a ' 1~ f&. % £ 7](. PIT* 1~ Je, #- ?Jr ffl z 4h ; Ji F1t -tz 7' P.'Ah 1*- 4h u°a fa." ~t 36 , f1t -tz·--l:: PIT iF 4h u°a , 1~ 1 7 Exhibit 1 Page 17 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 18 of 29

~t % 1.iT ~~fly 1f 1~ ~e. ff- fly ffl ~ 4h , tt 1-K -Jf1Ji!- i 381'} i 2 J~ f.Jl

~ ' '§ % ii. ~t O :fr_ ' 1:t{ -Jf 1* 1)f "t~ it- i 25111} 1Jt 1JJi tk ~ %- t)f 0 il:G Ji i: j' * tf !~ -Ji" * ~fe, 106 .ff- 8 A 8 8 tt~'i ~.itJL.1t

106 .ff- 8 A 31 8 :f tc. 'g ~.it-* '*~t

() 0 (, 0 ( !

0 C 0 ,,(l , ,

0 '> ~!'I ""·

.fo 4lf1 * .It,( 4bJ f4i. .fo 41/14bJ a"'o ~ ~pj if- t~ ~ .fa 41/14bJ £.r,~

A-1 1 £ 7)( iZ 1l m:t.. *ie. ~ 1 '.i ;.f.viJt JJal 1* £ 7]( iZ .{£. ~ WI ~ :1t 0- 6J 1:1:-. JIJJ •• ~fflm:t..«• 0

flit$:_:-. :fk1tn~r.., : 106 ~2 A 7 El tJlAt ~ fir : :l 'F ifr 1*J ~ ~ ;fa ~ ~ 18 ~ &.-tl'I ii! .i! :t.. ht fir ~ ;fkfr A. : £ 7)(iZ :fk4t1~-it: :lJ~:l'P~::.Oiid~106 ~&~4t:¥-J372 Jbt41:t~

.fo4tp * ~#JJ.4i. .fa 4111 #7 £ AH~ ttit 1itt ijd~~ .fo 4lf14bJ J',d'8~

F-1 2 ~ te. ~ 't JJI:\\ ( ~ i[itf, 1:l 1. t'!J ~ loj it~{k:t..Wf ~ f-te.~ .JJal pq :t.. r, 0 Exhibit 1 Page 18 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 19 of 29

( #! J:. 1( )

t;t) 'tl>i:t#.c.if;ii~ .i.~4h 44h £f'~it48~ .tt.&t~\106030-25-10, El it-T • 2 . ti A. f-i.1e. 'ii~ 106 1¥-2 ,EJ 13 El tt 4J!Ai , ti iii r r•J ~1ill. r PJJ" *& z ~ l>i:t tc. tt ,l~A@A;\:.~51.z.f-'l~i&': 0)106030-25-10\106030-25-10-FUJ IT SU-NW9XT682R86A,Pl\DocumentsandS et tings\ e 1a i ne \!iii\ 20nm (%)106030~25-10\106030-25-10-FUJ !TS U-NW9XT682R86A,Pl\Documents and Settings\ e 1a i ne \!iii \Micron CID106030-25-10\106030-25-10-FUJ ITS U-NW9XT682R86A, P2

[ • ,•;, ,_";, ,;) 0

[1ft *--=- ,¥JL,rr R~ M : 106 1¥-2 fa.l 7 El 0 -~) {) -a;., () -¥JL1thtPIJ": ,ft,fi"Jp!J..~3t.·~1*Jli..~l $1201 itll;!i..z.9 &,l:Bi!i!.z.4M :; 1: ¥71At A. : ..£ 7j(_ ~ :$Ji. fr 1~ ~, : ,f j,I~ ,f 'f ii!!,~ * fJt.106 1¥- J.i ~it~ ~;3 72 Wt.it 't $

;Jo ilf * ll~Ah 4 ;Jo 41114h J'o ~ f# if- ttidlt 4bJ £ t~

D-1 3 1i.. 1 . tP.J ~ltd~~1!JHUt it~ .z. ilt l>i:t ic. if- 4i ~-tf. ~ 4h _$4bJ a'1Af/iiJX.48~_:$r Zf ~ \106030-25-06\ El tf;T 0 2. * A.ft1~ 'ii~ l 06 1¥-2 ,EJ 13 El tJ!J ~ 1' t6J r.,, at#,: 4Jt1! , ti ii; T 11 :+t ff- ,I~¥.. ~¥..lt~~.z.f-'l~i&': G)4G3D Bin-z v(l).s WAT paramcorre 1at ion. xl s (Z)Fabll_twr_materials_for_25nm_tas k_force_v6.pptx CIDWAT param check for 1RF746 3E.

1 9 Exhibit 1 Page 19 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 20 of 29

(~J:..Jt)

WWC1 split.xis

D-2 4 &lj}- )i_t ,i;J\'i 1100 ~~%J••~••~tt~zt*~•« ~4~~Jf 4bJ £ f:$J~48P.i!JP!~ \ 10603 0-25-07\ El if-T 0

D-3 5 &ff.A' ;;_t~ 11@ ~~%J••~••~tt~zt*~•« ~4~4bJ Jf 4bJ £fo.,~48&ljpt~ \ 10603 0-25-08\ El i!T 0

D-4 6 Ace dHc. ~ ilU~ ( * UK 1. tJ!J ~»ii.ta{iUf •ta1!f14bJ z t*ic.it- t )/,Si,tt.) ;pl~441t,xAbJ ,If~ J'o·Mii ~481'.iljj- i.t~ \ 106030-25-09\ e1 ii:T 0 2. tit: A..f.t~ iE. l iY:'-106 4-2 JI 13 13 tf.l -W 'i t{;J M a~ ~fdJUi • t~ ~ T 71J El ii T flj--# :Iii~#-~ iY:'-k &i k:1t0-aJ z,f #.~ ~

\106030-25-09\106030-25-09-WD-W XL1A61D6393-250GB, P2\USB\YFA POOL\ c; Q f:

D-5 7 .lit 1/ii ~H~ t" 1* {: C>f"/"-'

D-6 8 ;(f 4~ ( 7j( ~ itUt #Jr# 1* 11-fr«t ~0180040015

5741 t f'%,: J:..7j(~ )

fl.t $:. 119 :t}t.,ff B1j- M : 106 Sf-2 JI 7 8 :t}t.,ff b\PIT : * '*i ,fr %1l:. ~ :llt El #-~428 , 430 ~l .i. 9;Jt p;i r!liY:'- .£ 7t ~ 100 A.. :t- ~ tr 1)- 1: :#t. fr A.. : .I.. 7j( ~ :tJt.4t*At: ±~±'fit!?.::?°i*ffc.106 4-&'.*4.!/l~1!D72 ~4t'#."~

4011!1* ~4bJ}f 4a ?!fl 4bJ .?a %, ~jlj .tUl' 11-U:. it-1,~ ~J'ofhfi M.

2 0 Exhibit 1 Page 20 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 21 of 29

(~J:.JO

C-1-1 9 .£7)(~j"iJ'4 3.,t.. ti 1-.. fi. 1e l , LUCIENT JAN 1/:-t?-J * -g tfiJ .i. M BH!~JUl • ttC-1-2 .sc. 1ii=- ui :1U1 : C-1-3 Peripheral Design Rules for DR25nm ) 1t~~~:it0~z.f#.#:!£'.

C-2 10 USB 111§1 ti~•~~~••••m••~•~•••* fta.t-Uij iii'+•

flit*-Ji ~frBtM : 106 ~2 A7 13 ~ fr nt ,Sfj- : * 1W rp #Jr rp I& 1W # .=.. ~ 57 !It.&.~ :.t~ i! it -Z. nt ,Sfj- ( .£ 71( :£Z 1$1.

I'.,'.'){) 0 0 1/:-Jjij * ~ + JJt10- ;If f!l 0 ~ Fab 12A i .::.-hiit ~ .z.£ J'o f.fil.J.!. ~ 0 '.i'. ) 1:~fr A : .£7}(~ :fJtAt 1«At : :I: JJJ i: 'F !tl!. ~ * f,t 106 ~ J.f. ~ 41 ~ i 37 5 WcAt ~ ~

,:to;fljl* JI\( ~bi Jlfi. .fo ;flj! ~bi £ ,t ~jlj. itit 1'1titt .... ,:, ifr. t~~ #JJ'oMu ~

A-1 11 PM2 fa.JI. ~Ali, if<. 1~

A-2-1 12 .SC.1ij:- j-il'4 3;.t.. 1 . ti .A. fi. 1e l ~MJ!l * 1' i~ MaHA- ~Jut , A-2-2 tll, -1f t wt !;; :it 0 ~ 5{, 1it- 0 A-2-3 2 . ti .A.LUC TENT JAN 11:-1 06 ~ 2 A 1613 ~ ~ 'itliJ Mat • :t~~!A-2-2 .5C. 1it-{i • ti~U.5C.1it- ~ ,Sfi"~"*-ii~C-1 -2 :x:.1ij:- ffl f<.$-tt;tr ,!:§ M .z.nt •

A-3 13 UMC.A.:f WHit<. l;.t..

A-4 14 ..I.. 7"}(. :£Z *te. *- l.i.f-- ti: A.~~1-~• · ••t~ ~:it~~ z,f ~#::&: •

A-5 15 -f ~ ;i;L "ti'.. 1-*" ~~1-~•· • •t~~ :it~~-Z.*

2 1 Exhibit 1 Page 21 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 22 of 29

(.~J:.J) .,~~·

A-6 16 .£ 7j(~ +4;\ ( rHlt l.i. 1 . tf.l iii- RJ A. tt :t.. ~f!. % # 1.il-!± .H~AbJ. 4bJ 0911-834291) J'a#J1iMf.48fm_Jpt~ \ 106030-25-01 \ 2 . .£ 7j( it 1~ ~iii- pg ~ft* ~ ~ j._ 7t. i;- ~ :t..

j-i/'Jf- 0

A-7 17 .£¥~-t~( r,%: 1j_ ~·RJ•••:t..i!t•~•*···#J· 0965702303) #J J'a iJ1i M1".481'ift jt -'f~ \ 106030- 25-02 \

A-8 18 Jf~ * ilt -r Jlt f,}- ;jf JI?'-:. i;- 1* 1 .1f!l iii- RJ ili•tt:t.. ilt* jc,if.#1.il-!±M4"1 ~ ~c. ~ #} S.. 7)(. it :t_ i;- .#; ,R,~M[.48&:l~ .lif~ \106030-25 Jfl ~Htt ( ~ ilt it~U,1t ) -03\ c:, 2 . tic-"'. f-*.11!!. ~ ~ 106 ~ 2 Jl 13 a ~ ~JU.l n (1 p ( , , i.i r 7,J e ti:* ~ ~ ~ ffe. 1c. i;- ~ .f -, oof,C• t' ~ ,&: :t.. ••fee. ii: : (.), Q 0 0 \106030-25 -03\106030-25- 0

-INTEL-CVTR5481031VR240CGN- 240GB 0 C (.1 (· , Pl\Users\00046685\Downloads\.:tt {, ~- 20161223Tlll122Z (•

l A-9 19 &!~~ 1 j_ 1f!l•RJ••••«•~-~---#J· t- #J J'.,J~~48&!~ -'f~ \ 106030-25-04 \

F{:j-.f<_ 7' ~-rretM : 106 ~2 Jl 9 El ~-rr&ffl:*~*t~~*~--~·~~•A ,t:~,rr-"'.: *ititii ~-rr*-.:ft : -Jltl :ft/ft~* I 133 f•.f.13 ~

~o4f * M4"1. ~o 41¥ #J £ ~ ~Ft !tit f;fj tt i-jdf;i~ #;£~ ~

1 34 HP~f:te.~ iltJJi ( Jf~ 1* Wilti;-~M;jf•~•RJ•••:t..iltC~ ilt;rt ii.: UMC030761) ii:~t •-!± M #J. 4"1 £ fot1i ~48~ ~it~ \106030-25-12\ 2 2 Exhibit 1 Page 22 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 23 of 29

C~...t..JO

2 20 Isl~~( ill e.PNYl 28 1100 1 . ..I. 7t ~ FIT 1f • 1J!I ~ hj it tt1Ui z ~~fee. GB) ~ ,ti ~ ;ff. 4bJ ~ 4£,J cr"o f'8 Wt, 48 lsft ~ );_t '"* \106030-25-13\ 2 . Ft {e. l ~HJ!! :t. 't-S!iJ M B1" t& ~JU! • 1-~-tt- ;ff A@ A 7t ~ ~ .f 'l .ft~ z ~~fee.if-

0

36 Isl~ ~ CKi ng s t on.f.il l{OO 1. {aJ ~ ~ M;ff • :J!I :t hj i.!H~Ai z ~ ~ fee. ~) if. -tt-M:.;ff. Jl~AbJ 4 4h .fa .Mii48 ~ ~ ;;t '"* \1 06030-25-14\ 2 . t~ A.. MUe. Ji j/;-tJ!l :t 't t!iJ MeHt ~JU! , m-11-;ffA@Ajt,~~*~~~z~~

fee.if- O

3 21 ¥,~Jf-.~if4 lJf-. ..I. 7j( ~ PIT ;ff , j~ Jf-. J:. z Jl.!i j~:.}.tii Wt. I 0

,··, :;, c.~ 0 <, -~· .~. ' 22 ¥,~Jf-.~if.4 lJf-. ..£7j<..~PIT1f • i~Jf-.J:.ZJ!Hfdfili~9 ~ 1~ ,.::, (J C, 0 A..~~fj!;-tJ!l•T~M~~~•·~~ r_", l;J A@A7f.~~zf--t~~· {:, (,J l,i ..:, ·-· •. .) ,J 35 ~~*-'i*-+ 13'*- 1. {aJ ~~FIT 1f • .~ '*-J:. z Jl.!i $3tl '-· \l ~2,3,4,5,6,7, 8,10,11,12,13,14 "., ,15 0 2.!AiWt.2,3,4,5,6,7, 8,10,11,12,13,1 j~ '*- j-il'4 &. f:~ ~ 151f if.+ ~ r'3 zELP I DA ECD-DPB -1111 , ECD-DPB-1076 • fAt.1e Ji jf;-1J!I ~ 'g ;/;J ro, B1" ~ ~Jt 4lt ' t,1:{~ J4 @ A jt,/t} ~ z* "t~Jb~ •

4 23 ~te.Jf-. l'*- ..I. 7j( ~ J5lr ;ff

5 37 f:ffi~.i!- ~ Jle Tc £.ft 1'*- .W h1r .g. 'f ,.:.;- .f l{1t i: t'

jiff *--c ~,rre} M : 106 ~2 A 8 8 ~.frbttlT: i:iwrr#Jrrp~joJJtr-~63Wt.657 '.i:

Exhibit 1 Page 23 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 24 of 29

( !-jt J:. Jr )

~fr1«Ali : ·M :f t/f "t~i!- i 133 fi}. j 3 :i.Jt

.fo4f * .4bJ4 .fo 4f 4bJ J'a ~ {pj. :it :I 1itt tt-Mli~ .fo4f 4h J'a.Ma~

1 25 .fr1v}.li,t~ UJl 1 . tJ!] ji %1 ••,1{ Z 'i[ ZiHe. if;#~,(f.. #J 4 4h a'{, Afli~48M_;$t .i;_tz)i'i \ 106030-25

-11 \ 0 2 . ti A ft 1e. ~ ;Y:-t}!] • 't tliJ M Bt ,ti,; ~JU! • ~#~A@A~0~*~~~z'ift4

f,e,i,f- 0

0 ( , ( ! Fft.:tt.A :v)i..fr Bt M : 106 1j;. 2 JI 1413 (". :fJtAt fit;W : ~ mif ,Wrif ~ ~ # E-si57~ (~if~ 'ift-f-.®:f,)-~ ~l0 ~ Fabl ( ~ (:, 0 .(,

11 2Ahii i .::. hii ~ hJj

.fo4f * •4n4 .fo 4117 4£,; £ ~ ~1t :it :I 1ffi-U. if-JA~ 4bJ J'a #$i tt

2B-l-l 26 1PJ" ~ ~ *t c. '*- 4-*- £. 2B- l -4

2B-2 27 1.: ~ 0 g_J ~ .:Sc. lflf

2B-3 28 #-1if;1;-~g lf,)-

2B-4 29 1PJ"~~ +:t~( r, tt 11.. tJ!J•Pi•••z••~•#~,tf.•#14 0910411131 , 4bJ£ ~ tt48M..!? ,i;_t~ \ 106030-25 -15\ 0965280938)

2B-5 30 1PJ"~~$tc. Bk

2B-6 31 1.Y ~~ *'ift (Asus~) 1:I: ~•Pi•••z••~•#~,tf.•#14 <) ,1 Exhibit 1 Page 24 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 25 of 29

(.~J:.Jl)

4h J'of$i~ft.48~Jt ,i;fi)f. \ 106030-25-16 \

2B-7 32 JI~ it!: j-i/'+ 25*

2B-8 33 1oJ ~ ~ ilt -f- t~ 1*- fJ! tr 1100 ~-~---~--~-#&4•~• ~ 4h o'1 ftli Mi.48&ttt ,of~\ 106030-25-17 \

11/t *-it. :#lAi" B1- M : 106 ~ 2 Jl 14 El AA. rr 1k JStr : :i: 1*J rr #Jr rfi ~ 1*J # .=. li$. 57 lt ( JI~ -* ilt -f- 1*: fir ;ffPtl -0- ~ Fa b 12Mil 'AL::.. .!!it ~ #Jr Jf S*At~•-~m~AP~~-~-A~-0-~)

I) .0 ()GO -§::#(.,ft-A:~·~

,') ," •',) AA. H 1:tdt : :i: !ii! :i: t it!?, 4 it- ~Jt. l 06 ~ I.it ~ 4!/l. ~ i 416 *". 41 :t ~ •.) 0 0 1', <:· £) 0 Q 0 f~~ :}f V 0 ~4h. -70 4h o'1 .% ~i it-fr -#fitt

" 0 0 4bJ a"'o~ iit ~J '-' 0 'JC,('.) o 0 2A- l- l 39 iphone+~it l i.. ~-~---~·-~•#•4•~• ih £f1U,t48~!t ,i;f~ \ 106030-25-18 \ 2A - 1-2 40 iphone-t~~ l i.. ~·~•••~«•~•#&4M~4 4h J'ofa.AiMt48fJ!Jt J;j?_~ \ 106030-25 -19\

2A-2 41 ,i;_f~ 11@ ~-~---~--~-#&4•~•4bJ .?aJ<,Mc.48~~ lt~ \ 106030-25-20\ 2A-3 42 M.~~ lf@ ~-~---~--~M#&4M~4 4h £ ~ *".481!it tr ,i;t .t.1- \ l 06030 -25 -21 \ 2A-4 43 fr1/Jlj(~ l{g] ~-~---~«-~-#~4-~4 4h o'1 .fti, ~48~!t ,of~\ 106030 -25 -22 \

2A-5-l 44 tl°:f;f.. 2;f.. 2A-5-2

2A-6-1 45 3C. ft 2*-

~ b Exhibit 1 Page 25 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 26 of 29

2A-6-2

2A-7 1* l$ *i~ 1*- ~-'g-~~#~-1-·ff*~~·~· Jk1/;'- l 06 i!=-2 ~ 14 EHt ~ ~ ~-*.

2A-8 46 A~ -*.ACER *iii: 1'.i: ~~foj···.t·-~-#~4-~4 4!,; .ra.~~48&1:M' ,iif ~ \ 106030-25-23 \

2A-9 &1:tr..$:. BJ ~-'i•A~#~~·ff*M~•~• lk~ 106 i!=-2 13 1481t~~ ~-*.

2A-10 47 ~ ~ -*.-0-iffl-j-iHM.~ li.. 1. t/!l 11i' foj••4t.t ••ii.#&4J!,(!t!,; ,I;~ 44!,; J'... ~~48M.~ ,iif~ \ 106030-25-2 4\ Cl 2.-tl.'itiiiH~~"- ' t:.AJo4f ~-I- ' ( ; 0 11;-106 i!=-4 13 25 a i:;, 4 0-4il-4'-1t ~ A ~-*- • ( , ( (;< c, G r) ;

j) c, (.) (, 000 Flt*+ :tJtfr a* M : 106 i!=-2 13 14 a 0 0 CJ (j', . :tJtfrlkM:*~•M•~A~~-6~8-.t5 ~:tJtfr A. : ~ ~-*- :tJt fr*. :tli : *.,tpJ;>t]f "t~ i!- 7* 131 {i .t1 f&.1:: Jt t A. ~ ;t :tJt fr Jt 1:

-~~ .4!,;J4t Jo ~f ~ o~ _t ~)ij £tit {jfjU. !ff,; .fa Jtii 'sl!c,..

2C 38 HTC-f-~ 1 i.. ~·foj···.t·-~-#&4J!,(~ 44!,; .?a Ml,~;:.48&1:M' ;;.t_~ \ 10603-25 -25\

2 6 Exhibit 1 Page 26 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 27 of 29

llft *- +- ii.~!~ tp.j ~ Joj ¥t1~ z Aft if ~

~ !f!IJ ~ th .?a .r, ~ th J',, ,t ~~ ttit 1itt

24 &ft.~~( .'!.-, E, l.i. 1. "Jr :11:. rrtJ!J ~ 411:' 106 .i!=-2 A 14 El t{;J •. 64GB) r..,..f..7j(.~e,, {tl..f....f..7j(.~googld& W.. !!p $ ~it~ Tix,JS!j-tf 'i il'4 2 . LUC IENT JAN 11:' t]!J :t 'g t{;J r.., at{~ ~.It 11 , $~it~ 17-J zGDS {it ~ ~ ~ @ A /c/t} ~ z25nm DRAM a£ Des i gn Ru I e ;1f ;!:!I Mz ~ • 3. tt ll;ft~ zi l7'J zfit ~~Pit~ .i-~tbJ ~ tbJ £ ~~48&tif Aif ~ 106030-25-26 \ El if-T

(I 0 l'.i (.) (i o O O C) 48 &ft. if itzi (1 TB )l @. ) 1100 l7'J 1-ik~!~t,l!J :tloj 106030~1i,tt~il %z 'Qt~tc..if- 0 C, 0 0 <> 0 0 0

0 C, 0 0 () 0 ,"') (• () llft *- +.:;. "() oooc,o (, %t1FA. ~4-f.rA. %tlfft ~

i;-~ A lt~~ ..f..1::.~ftgiji ..f.. 7)(.~ # ~~,t_f:gifi (105 .i!=-9 A 2 a 4-1:r H~ 1'~d~ .ii:.) {of~~ *;:Ji: ~ftgiji .!l~'it~~ ~t.~J

¥.~Alt~~ ..f..1'::.~ftciji # ~~ttcifi C105 .i!=-9 A2 a .t-#:- HM 1!d~ .ii:. ) ~~1::.# giji

2 7 Exhibit 1 Page 27 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 28 of 29

flit*-+;...

.tclHtA 4:*1:£-A %*'.tt~

~~ iE -0- a) r.t. -tlf ;i;' ~ fliji £7j(it J1~~~lliji (106 .if:-6 J3l9B~1~ij~1!d~.ii:) if .~.;[email protected]:ciJi

?fr 11:, ik 11,} : * 1P;t~$ * J 131'}-zl ~ IE A §I G ~ J -=- A~ ik z :fiJ.~. , ~ ~l $ ,f 1P; f~ $ ?fr~ A. z *'1 iii ,~~T~tt%z-,A£~~T~M~~~~&,ff##~*

(,} ~-s~iGiAJ:..--t~iGiAT-fil-i-: ( • ("', c, t CO (l C, ()

-,~a~,~~,~~,t~,~§lt•~•~~~~*~~ 0 0 (; () (' ( · i " **•~~,~~ff~~~~m,~~*o Cc, (IO(, ~,~~~#~••~$'*•~•~-~~•~oo~••,~ ~ 0 0 0 .() m~ j13t if!1&tt -t • t~$ * o

0 () () (.',' .=..'#~··~$,&*$~$ffl~A.%~-~~,--~'~ (. ( ; -:4 llll.,J rrh... t:k uJt. :::\-: TI_£ EE H:- M, "'*" ~-1. ~ ....±L 0 q 111J~ l~i;- ' ~PJ .J.~ SX-i ,j~.. ~ a~ g ~ ·"r~ Jfil" ;.a w,~~~A.~~~#~z·-~$~i-=-~ffl~ttm,~~* , 1~ m~ it i~ * 0 mJ:~ z -*- ~ ~e.. ill z 0 #iil*~,~~*ffAAfflffz~iii~~-fil*•fa,ff~ffl~

:f1] ~z~1% ~ 00 pg~_;_ /Jo. 0 * 1t ;f~ $ i} J 131i z 2 ~ IE 1±- 9~ ~ , *- fi ;t~ i& , :t ~~it ri 1~ m , ~ 1e.. m1*-" ~ - :i:Ji ~it z~*'A-•~J:..+•~T~M~m,~*#~~-~~-iG J:A J:.. £ -t ~ ic. J:A T z ill * 0 R;J J:~ z .*- ~ Je.. ill ~ 0 # iiJ * at , ~o Je.. *-ft A Artr 1J z *'1 ~~~iii * :i1i } a , if 1* ttr 1J

2 8 Exhibit 1 Page 28 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 29 of 29

~ 1J~ z .::-1~ R. -t-1~ ~ III 03 ~~ ;_ /Jo :t 0

,f -t :ti Jfi ik i 1311} z4 *AzR*A'*A~~~Az~mA,*£A~~~~-Al ,§~ff-f~,~•+-~•z-,J+~•z~z~*'~*U

0 -~~A~~ffAA~,~U*A~~~A$#U*z~~ ~ *AzR*A~~~Afi~~~z*~'~ahA~~ffA*' ~-tf.tcHl 0 ;fr 11 {i ik i 911'* ~~~:t•z~*~$~Az~~M£**'A3·~~T~~ ~M'~~'~#~##~~-75X~~TiU~ 0 tEM~~ili-~~~~:t•z~*~$~Az;f~M£**'

(~ A· 6 faJ j,A J:.. 5 i¥- j,A T ;Jif" :)t,A ~ -Htl , 1f1#- # #Jr '.I: %1:. 20 X ~ J:A J:.. 2 O 0 0 {) s~~iAT-f.1~ 0

' · (i ~: ~ iA :t •~ ,'c~ z~ >k~e.. ~~ :i:~ z ~ :if- , A 6 JJ £A J:.. 5 i¥-£.A T ~ I.A l -(: •) 00 ,:, o ~ -Jt1J ' 1f1#-i4-#Jr :I: \1:. 50 ~~ix J:.. 5 s i ~ .1,A T -fij ~ 0 ("J 0 O ,, ,,,Q ;f 1,t 111~1&1 A~~ ~%I!.1~ffl :if- ' ~ ~14.~;f 11 llf 1~ $ 0

... , 0000<) •J •)

2 9 Exhibit 1 Page 29 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 29

Indictment Decision of Taiwan Taichung District Prosecutors Office

Case No: 106-Zhen-Tzu No. 11035 106-Zhen-Tzu No. 4520 106-Zhen-Tzu No. 5612 106-Zhen-Tzu No. 5613

Defendant JT Ho (Personal information

omitted)

Attorney Jun-Yi Jia

Defendant Kenny Wang

Attorney Ting-Lu Zhuan

Che-Hung Chen (terminated

on Feb 7, 2017)

Defendant Leh-Tian Rong

Attorney Che-Hung Chen;

En-Xu Huang;

Jia-Kun Liu (terminated on

June 19, 2017)

Defendant United Microelectronics

Corporation

Legal Representative Stan Hung

Attorney En-Xu Huang;

Mei-Fen Hung

Regarding the above defendants’ violation of the Trade Secret Act , the investigation has been closed and the prosecutor has decided to indict the defendants. The prosecutor hereby describes the facts of the

1

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 30 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 29

committed crime and presents the evidence as well as the violated laws as follows:

Facts of the Committed Crime I. JT Ho and Kenny Wang were the employees of Rexchip Electronics Corp., located at No. 369, Sec.4, San Feng Rd., Houli District, Central Taiwan Science Park, Taichung (“Rexchip”). Rexchip was jointly formed by Elpida Memory, Inc. of Japan (“Elpida Japan”) and Powerchip Technology Corporation (“Powerchip”) to conduct business as a DRAM foundry. Micron Technology, Inc. (“MTI”) has its headquarters at Boise, Idaho of the USA. MTI’s main business includes manufacture and sale of DRAM, NAND flash and NOR flash, and assembly resolutions and semiconductor systems. In 2013, MTI acquired most of Elpida Japan’s and Rexchip’s shares and renamed Elpida Japan to Micron Memory Japan, and Rexchip to Micron Memory Taiwan Co., Ltd. (“MMT”). JT Ho and Kenny Wang became the employees of MMT as a result of the acquisition. On September 2, 2011, MTI authorized Micron Semiconductor Asia to use its IP rights. MMT made information relating to the method, technology, process and design for manufacturing DRAM into copyrighted works in the form of words, symbols and graphics. This information is saved on MMT’s server with encryption and limited access: MMT’s employees need to log onto the server by entering user names and passwords before accessing the abovementioned electronic records. In addition, access by USB PORT (a port connecting computers and external storage devices) has been banned since April 20, 2016. The abovementioned electronic records are information not known to the industry and highly economically valuable with reasonable protection, and they constitute “trade secrets” under Article 2 of the Trade Secret Act. On February 28, 2014, MMT entered into the MTI/MMT Design Engineering Services Agreement with MTI and transferred to MTI the IP rights it had obtained before and during the period covered by the Agreement. On the same date, MMT obtained the right to continuously use MTI’s IP rights from Micron Semiconductor Asia. II. United Microelectronics Corporation (“UMC”) was the first company in Taiwan to provide integrated circuit (IC) wafer foundry OEM service. It used to conduct DRAM development and manufacturing, but then it closed the DRAM manufacturing business and transferred relevant technical employees to other departments of UMC. In January 2016, UMC entered into an agreement with Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd. of Mainland China (“Jinhua”) to develop 32nm DRAM and 32Snm DRAM technologies. Under the agreement, Jinhua will provide US$300 million for purchasing necessary equipment for the 2

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 31 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 3 of 29

DRAM development and will pay US$400 million to UMC based on the progress of development. The results of development shall be jointly owned by both parties. After the development is completed, the technology will be transferred to Jinhua for mass production of 32nm DRAM and 32Snm DRAM. To carry out the abovementioned agreement, UMC established the New Business Development (“NBD”) at the Second Factory Area of its Fab 12A in Tainan Science Park in January 2016. Zheng-Kun Chen (Stephen Chen, Former chairman of MMT, who left MMT on July 31, 2015 and joined UMC as senior VP in September 2015) was in charge of NBD, and UMC established several departments under NBD named “Project Technology Management Department 1” (“PM1”), “Project Technology Management Department 2” (“PM2”) and “Project Technology Management Department 3” (“PM3”). Stephen Chen then recruited people from MMT, including JT Ho and Kenny Wang, and appointed Leh-Tian Rong to head PM2 as Assistant Vice President. Under PM2 there are Process Integration Unit 1 (“PI1”), Process Integration Unit 2 (“PI2”), Defect Analysis Management Unit (“DM”) and Device Unit (“Device”). UMC filed an application for approval of the above technology cooperation with the Investment Commission of the Department of Economics on March 11, 2016, and the Commission approved the application on April 14, 2016 per the approval letter of Jin-Shen-Er No. 10500055030. Subsequently, UMC, Jinhua and Ultra Memory Inc. of Japan (“UMI Japan”) signed the “F32nm Design Service Agreement” on November 8, 2016. Because semiconductor manufacture process is a professional, sophisticated and complex technology which is often affected by different manufacturing equipment and methods, it is necessary to have a set of rules in place to define the relevant electrical parameters when considering how to manufacture the products successfully. Thus, the parties agreed that, after the DRAM design rules (also called the Layout Rule) were converted into source code, UMI Japan shall be responsible for revising the design rules, giving feedback, executing the program and designing and manufacturing the chips, and Jinhua will pay the design and service fees of US$3,783,000 to UMI Japan in 3 installments. After UMI Japan has completed testing and delivered the GDS files (TV0 and TV1) and DDR4 chip of TV1, it will transfer the entire 32/32S nm DRAM development technology to Jinhua for Jinhua’s mass production. However, to conduct business for UMC, UMC’s employees, namely JT Ho, Kenny Wang and Leh-Tian Rong, committed the following crimes. III. On February 24, 2014, JT Ho signed the Employment Agreement and the “Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Agreement” (“CIPA”) with MMT.

3

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 32 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 4 of 29

Under the CIPA, JT Ho shall, upon the termination of his employment with MMT, leave with MMT all documents, records, notebooks or other repositories containing confidential information (including trade secrets), including copies thereof and information maintained in hardcopies and electronic form then in his possession or control; if JT Ho has any confidential information on non-MMT property, he shall immediately return such confidential information to MMT and destroy any copies in his possession or control. Because of his position as the section chief of MMT’s mass production department, JT Ho logged into the company’s controlled server to access electronic records relating to the DRAM production process, which is MTI’s trade secret (“Electronic Record A”). He copied the records to his own USB (item 36 in Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 6) and personal hard drive (item shown in Table 7) for his reference any time during work, and possessed the hardcopy documents containing MTI’s trade secrets (Paper Documents nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of item 35 in Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 6 and documents named ECD-DPB- 1076 and ECD-DPB-1111 in File 15, collectively referred to as “Paper Documents B.”) Subsequently on October 15, 2015 when JT Ho resigned from MMT, he did not destroy Electronic Record A and Paper Documents B in accordance with the agreements. JT Ho joined UMC in November 2015 and became the Process Integration1 Manager under PM2 in April 2016. In January 2016, JT Ho was aware that UMC started to carry out the cooperation project with Jinhua and became MTI’s competitor, and he was aware that the Electronic Record A and the Paper Document B he possessed could contribute to UMC’s and Jinhua’s mass production of DRAM in Mainland China. Instead of deleting or destroying Electronic Record A and Paper Documents B, JT Ho reviewed Electronic Record A using his UMC issued laptop (Item No. 34 of Confiscated- Property Storage in Table 6), with USB PORT control removed, in his UMC staff dormitory (Rm 657, No. 63 Dashun 6th Rd, Xinshi Dist., Tainan City), and in his UMC office in the Second Factory Area of UMC’s Fab 12A (57 Nanke 3rd Rd, Xinshi Dist., Tainan City) during the period from January 2016 to February 7, 2017 (the date when [Prosecutors] conducted the search). During this period, he also brought Paper Documents B to the PI1 office for use. JT Ho’s access to Electronic Record A and Paper Documents B exceeded MMT’s authorized scope of use for such information, and he intended to use the information in Mainland China contrary to MTI’s interest. IV. Kenny Wang’s last position at MMT was Product Quality Integration Manager, which gave him the right to access information relating to all final products to

4

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 33 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 5 of 29

ensure that the final DRAM products met client specifications and quality requirements. In January and February 2016, Kenny Wang contacted JT Ho, who was then working at NBD of UMC, through the communication application LINE, and became aware that UMC was looking device specialists for its DRAM project with Jinhua. After further discussion, Kenny Wang decided to join UMC and submitted his resume to UMC through JT Ho. Consequently, at the end of February 2016, Kenny Wang visited UMC and was interviewed by UMC’s HR team leader and Leh-Tian Rong. UMC and Kenny Wang agreed that Kenny Wang would be hired with the same salary and benefits as he had at MMT but that, if he is relocated to Mainland China, he will sign another contract with Jinhua and be entitled to an additional bonus. Subsequently on March 25, 2016, Kenny Wang received an Offer Letter from UMC, and informed JT Ho through the LINE communication application. JT Ho thus started treating Kenny Wang as a team member of UMC and discussed through the LINE communication application the issues that UMC had in developing DRAM technologies. Kenny Wang submitted his resignation letter to MMT on April 5, 2016 and left the company on April 26, 2016 upon the company’s approval. From April 16 to 23, 2017, being fully aware that MTI and UMC are competitors in the development and manufacturing of DRAM and with the intent to use the information in Mainland China and to damage MTI’s interest, Kenny Wang abused his authorization as the Product Quality Integration Manager by using MMT’s laptop (Staff number: 1132954, User name: KENNYW, items shown in Table 1) to log on to MMT’s server and to access MTI’s electronic information relating to the method, technology, process and design of DRAM (“Electronic Record C,” including a total of 931 files), which are protected trade secrets and copyrighted works. He stored Electronic Record C onto the abovementioned laptop, transferred it to a USB storage device (Item 3 in Confiscated-Property Storage of Table 3), and then to two of his own laptops (Table 2 and item No. 6 in Table 3 of the Confiscated-Property Storage) and also uploaded it to his Google Drive (account number: [email protected]).. Kenny Wang’s unauthorized copying of Electronic Record C violated MTI’s and MMT’s control over the records, and infringed MTI’s trade-secret right and copyright in the records. V. After joining UMC on April 28, 2016, as Device Technology Manager of PM2, with the abovementioned intent and also the criminal intent to reproduce another’s works, Kenny Wang used his phone (number: 0911-834291, i.e. Item No. 17 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 5) and the laptop issued by UMC (i.e. Item No. 18 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 5) to access

5

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 34 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 6 of 29

Electronic Record C stored on Google Drive (account number: [email protected]) and downloaded MMT’s “DRAM design rules” (file name: [DR25nmS] Temporary design rules Periphery Rev. 6; location path: V90B/0.Design/Design rules, hereafter “DR25nmS Design rules”) and other electronic records. Kenny Wang then printed out the above electronic records (i.e. Paper documents No. C-1-2 in Table 4 and Item No. 22 of the Confiscated- Property Storage in Table 6, collectively referred to as “Paper Documents D”), thereby infringing MTI’s copyright. Subsequently one day in July or August 2016, when attending the PM2 morning meeting held by Leh-Tian Rong, Kenny Wang was asked to stay in the meeting room with Ming-De Wei (the manager of PI2) after the meeting and discuss the draft of the F32 DRAM design rules presented by Wei. Because UMC has specialized as a logic process foundry in the past and has no DRAM-related designer’s manual, PI2 had to use a 65nm logic process designer’s manual as its blueprint. The abovementioned draft therefore lacked the necessary parameters of “Cell,” “Array” and “Periphery” in the DRAM design rules. Kenny Wang thus provided his comments on ion- implantation process parameters (a key process to control doping in semiconductor manufacturing). Leh-Tian Rong, albeit fully aware that Kenny Wang left MMT nearly six months previously and that the MMT information Kenny Wang possessed was likely obtained illegally, asked Kenny Wang to compare the F32 DRAM design rules of UMC with MMT’s materials (i.e. the DR25nmS design rules), circle out the differences between the two, write down MTI’s “stabilization data” on UMC’s draft design rules, fill in necessary parameters relating to ion-implantation which cannot be obtained through reverse engineering, and help complete the parts including “Cell”, “Array”, and “Periphery” for Rong’s review, so that UMC can complete the F32 DRAM design rules more quickly. Two to three days after Kenny Wang received the said instructions from Rong, he downloaded UMC’s final version of the logic IC design rules, created columns for “Cell,” “Array” and “Periphery” and filled in parameters for “width” and “space” on more than 10 pages of UMC’s final version of the design rules, using the DR25nmS design rules as a reference. Kenny Wang quickly completed the addition and revision of the parameters and handed in the hard copies containing the parameters of the DR25nmS design rules to Leh-Tian Rong in person. Rong handed them to Wei and told Wei to discuss them with Kenny Wang. Wei, unaware of the foregoing, discussed the stability of the parameters of UMC’s F32 DRAM design and other parameters with Kenny Wang and Wu Kuo-How, an engineer of PI2, and completed UMC’s F32 DRAM design rules. Originally UMC had no mask tape out team or ion- 6

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 35 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 7 of 29

implantation specialists. After Kenny Wang provided the DR25nmS design rules production parameters, PI2 skipped processes such as the optical lithography adjustment, etching and yellow light processes when developing the F32 DRAM. The design rules were completed within only 2 months and handed to the chip design manufacturer for the next step. Kenny Wang was promoted to Device Manager in January 2017 for excellent performance in reducing the time, costs, equipment and labor in producing the design rules. VI. After Kenny Wang left, MMT through its internal investigation suspected that Kenny Wang had copied Electronic Record C without authorization. MTI and MMT thus filed a criminal complaint with MJIB New Taipei Branch and provided the laptop (as in Table 1) to MJIB for its custody. After receiving the complaint, the prosecutor of this Office filed an application to monitor Kenny Wang’s phone (Number: 0911-834291) with the Taichung District Court, which was approved. After the grant of the search warrant by the Taichung District Court, the prosecutor led the investigation officers of MJIB New Taipei Branch to search the places as shown in Tables 2 to 5 simultaneously and seized the items as shown in Tables 2 to 5 on February 7, 2017. At around 14:10 on February 7, 2017, the MJIB officers arrived at the Second Factory Area of UMC’s Fab 12A (address: No.57, Nan-Ke-San Rd., Xin-Shi District, Tainan) to conduct searches. When the officers were heading to PM2 accompanied by UMC’s Security Team Manager Ching-Yuan Chiu and others, UMC’s HR team informed Leh-Tian Rong that the MJIB officers were about to search Kenny Wang’s work area. Rong immediately asked Kenny Wang and JT Ho respectively to delete and remove all the information relating to MMT. Following Rong’s instructions, Kenny Wang and JT Ho handed the items listed in Table 6 to Shu-Han Huang, an assistant engineer of PM2, for her custody (Huang was subject to deferred indictment due to her violation of Article 165 of Criminal Code). Huang locked the items in her personal locker and left the office with Kenny Wang’s phone (Number: 0911- 834291). As a result, when the MJIB officers searched Kenny Wang’s workplace, they only found his UMC issued phone (Number: 0965-702303); his personal phone under surveillance (Number: 0911-834291) was missing. When questioned, Kenny Wang claimed that Shu-Han Huang borrowed the phone in the morning because she wanted to see some photos. After the supervisors of UMC were asked to contact Huang demanding that she return to the office immediately, Huang came back to the office and handed over Kenny Wang’s personal phone (Number: 0911-834291) to MJIB officers for their custody at 15:25 on February 7, 2016 (sic) [2017].

7

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 36 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 8 of 29

VII. After being questioned by the prosecutor as a witness, JT Ho submitted the items listed in Table 7 for MJIB officers’ custody on February 8, 2017. Shu-Han Huang also spontaneously submitted the items listed in Table 6 for the prosecutors’ custody on February 9, 2017. On February 7 and 8, 2017, when Kenny Wang was questioned by the MJIB officers and the prosecutor, he confessed to the facts stated in Section 5 above. Based on the above evidence, the prosecutor obtained another search warrant from the Taichung District Court and led officers of the MJIB New Taipei Branch to search the places listed in Tables 8 and 9, seizing the items listed in Tables 8 and 9 on February 14, 2017. The prosecutor and the MJIB officers further searched the places listed in Table 10 with Leh-Tian Rong’s consent and seized the items listed in Table 10. VIII. MMT and MTI filed the criminal complaint (please see Table 12 for the attorney authorization and the defendants to be named); UMC also filed a report of the crime (please see Table 13 for the attorney authorization and the defendant to be named). The MJIB New Taipei Branch officers investigated the case under the supervision of the prosecutor of this Office, and sent the case to this Office for further handling. Evidence and Statutes Violated I. The evidence serving as the basis for Criminal Findings: (I) Testimonial evidence: 1. Defendant JT Ho’s testimony when questioned by MJIB officers on February 14, 2017 (pages 2-54 in File C); his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 15 and June 9, 2017 (pages 78-87 in File C, pages 87-91 in File A4); 2. Defendant Kenny Wang’s testimony when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7 and 14, 2017 (pages 4-27, 115-135 in File B); his testimony both before and after being placed under oath when questioned by the prosecutor on February 8 and 15, 2017 (pages 92-107, 243-252 in File B); and his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on June 9, 2017 (pages 92-107 and 243-252 in File B, and pages 83-91 in File A4); 3. Defendant Leh-Tian Rong’s testimony when questioned by MJIB officers on February 14, 2017 (pages 5-25 in File D); his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 15 and June 15, 2017 (pages 41-55, 115-125 in File D); 4. The statements of Jia-Kun Liu, Esq. (i.e. Defendant UMC’s lawyer) when questioned by MJIB on March 14, 2017 (pages 14-24 in File A5);

5. Co-Defendant Shu-Han Huang’s testimony when questioned by MJIB officers on 8

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 37 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 9 of 29

February 7, 2017 (pages 5-12 in File E); her testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 8-9 and June 15, 2017 (pages 73-75 in File E); 6. Complainant MMT’s legal manager Siesen Chen’s statements when questioned by MJIB officers on August 18 and September 1, 2016 (pages 132-147 in File A1); his testimony as a witness when questioned by the prosecutor on February 13, 2017 (pages 186-187 in File A2); 7. The testimony of Witness David Alford Ashmore (MTI’s general counsel) when questioned by MJIB officers on September 1 and December 14, 2016 (pages 149- 154, 316-321 in File A1);

8. The testimony of Witness J. R. Tietsort (MTI’s IT security department personnel) when questioned by MJIB officers on September 1, 2016 (pages 155-163 in File A1); 9. The testimony from Witness Lucient Jan (MTI’s engineer) when questioned by MJIB officers on November 22, 2016 and February 16, 2017 (pages 267-274 in File A1, pages 331-336 in File A2); 10. Defendant JT Ho’s testimony as witness when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7, 2017 (pages 341-353 in File A1); and his testimony as witness when questioned by the prosecutor on February 8, 2017 (pages 357-365 in File A1); 11. The testimony from Witness Sandy Kuo (UMC’s project manager in the Southern Taiwan Science Park) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 8, 2017 (pages 368-378 in File A1); and her testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 8, 2017 (pages 383-385 in File A1); 12. The testimony of Witness Stephen Chen (UMC’s senior VP) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 8, 2017 (pages 387-393 in File A1); and his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 8, 2017 (pages 396-401 in File A1); 13. The testimony of Witness Bo-Chang Hung (MMT’s process-integration department manager) when questioned by MJIB investigator on February 7, 2017 (pages 1-7 in File A2); 14. The testimony of Witness Wen-How Hsieh (MMT’s process-integration department section manager) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7, 2017 (pages 11-19 in File A2); 15. The testimony of Witness Shiu-Jan Lin (MMT’s process-integration department engineer) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7, 2017 (pages 74-82 in

9

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 38 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 10 of 29

File A2); 16. The testimony of Witness Yi-Ling Chen (MMT’s real-time defect-analysis department manager) when questioned by MJIB investigator on February 7 and February 13, 2017 (pages 85-93, 118-124 in File A2); the testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 13 and May 25, 2017 (pages 182-187, page 383-387 in File A2); 17. The testimony of Witness Hung-Yi Lin (MMT’s PROVER department function section engineer) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7, 2017 (pages 95-101 in File A2);

18. The testimony of Witness Ding-Lu Yu (chairman of Applied Materials Taiwan) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 7, 2017 (pages 103-107 in File A2); 19. The testimony of Witness Chi- Lun Wang (Chief Director of Techinsights Taiwan) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 13, 2017 (pages 108-111 in File A2); and his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 13, 2017 (pages 113-116 in File A2); 20. The testimony of Witness Kuo-How Wu (UMC’s process-integration engineer) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 14, 2017 (pages 230-241 in File A2); and his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor on February 15, 2017 (pages 314-319 in File A2); 21. The testimony of Witness Ming-De Wei (second manager of UMC’s process- integration department) when questioned by MJIB officers on February 14, 2017 (pages 248-264 in File A2); and his testimony when questioned by the prosecutor February 15, 2017 (pages 320-326 in File A2). (II) Non-testimonial evidence:

1. MMT’s corporate registration records (page 17 in File A1); 2. MMT’s standard confidentiality and IP agreement (pages 18-26 in File A1); 3. “The Maintenance of Confidential Information” in MMT’s “Team Member Manual” (pages 32-36 in File A1); 4. MMT’s work rules (page 37-41 in File A1); 5. The USB control measure for personal computers issued by MMT on April 20, 2016 (pages 54-56 in File A1);

6. The warning language that would appear while MMT’s employees access to the

10

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 39 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 11 of 29

electronic records containing trade secrets in the computer server (page 57 in File A1); 7. Defendant Kenny Wang’s resignation letter submitted to MMT on April 5, 2016 (pages 73-74 in File A1); 8. Defendant Kenny Wang’s attendance and entrance records in MMT from March 20 to April 26, 2016 (page 78-81 in File A1); 9. Defendant Kenny Wang’s file-transfer records in the laptop he used shown in Table 1 (pages 83-97 in File A1);

10. The Employment Agreement cum Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Agreement between Defendant Kenny Wang and MMT signed on February 26, 2014 (pages 104-120 in File A1); 11. Defendant Kenny Wang’s training records during his service at MMT (pages 122- 126 in File A1); 12. Defendant Kenny Wang’s resignation agreement on April 26, 2016 (pages127-131 in File A1); 13. MTI’s written explanation of the importance of the electronic records that Defendant Kenny Wang illegally obtained (pages 186-198 in File A1, pages 325- 492 in File A3); 14. MTI/MMT Design Engineering Service Agreement on February 28, 2014 (pages 206-216 in File A1); MSA/MTI Front-end Manufacturing Supply Agreement on September 2, 2011 (pages 217-231 in File A1); Foundry Agreement between Micron Singapore and MMT on February 28, 2014 (pages 233-252 in File A1); 15. MTI’s analysis report of the laptop used by Defendant Kenny Wang shown in Table 1 (pages 511-528 in File A1);

16. Defendants Kenny Wang and JT Ho’s labor-insurance records (pages 536-537 in File A3); 17. Forensic report attached in MJIB’s 2016-10-05 Letter Diao-Zi-Wu-Zi No. 10514003270 (pages 543-544 in File A3); 18. Forensic report attached in MJIB’s 2017-02-23 Letter Diao-Zi-Wu-Zi No. 10614505100 (pages 570-573 in File A3); 19. The file list of the cloud drive used by Defendant Kenny Wang (pages 576-678 in File A3);

20. The complete file of UMC’s investment application for UMC’s cooperation 11

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 40 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 12 of 29

project with Jinhua provided by the Investment Commission (pages 682-725 in File A3); 21. Defendant Kenny Wang’s chat history in Line communication application (pages 790-912 in File A3); 22. MMT’s letter to Defendant JT Ho on April 19, 2016 (pages 191-192 in File A2); 23. The Employment Agreement cum Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Agreement between Defendant JT Ho and MMT signed on February 24, 2014 (pages 193-200, 210-218 in File A2);

24. Photocopy of Defendant JT Ho’s personnel data card kept by MMT (page 203 in File A2); 25. The employment agreement between Rexchip and Defendant JT Ho (pages 204- 206 in File A2); 26. MJIB’s on-site report on the search over Defendant Kenny Wang’s office on February 7, 2017 (pages 16-17 in File E); 27. The seizure record in Table 1 (pages 176-178.1 in File A1), the search and seizure record in Table 2 (pages 31-34 in File F1), the search and seizure record in Table 3 (pages 47-49 in File F1), the search and seizure record in Table 4 (pages 24-26 in File F1), the search and seizure record in Table 5 (pages 30-33 in File F2), the seizure record in Table 6 (pages 67-68 in File E), the seizure record in Table 7 (pages 96-99 in File C), the search and seizure record in Table 8 (pages 26-29 in File F4), the search and seizure record in Table 9 (pages 23-27 in File F3), and the search and seizure record in Table 10 (pages 28-31 in File F3); 28. Photos of articles seized (pages 53-75 in File A4); 29. Articles seized listed in Tables 1 to 10.

II. Determination for the case:

(I) Whether an offence constitutes direct harm should be decided by whether the criminal conduct has directly led to infringement upon a legal interest. When more than one legal interest simultaneously exist in one object and are directly infringed by the criminal conduct, the right holders of both legal interests are the direct victims, and it does not matter if there are other direct victims. See Supreme Court precedent Year 1941 Shang-Zi 3416. Defendants JT Ho and Kenny Wang are suspected to have infringed the information regarding the methods, technology, process, and design of manufacturing DRAM wafers, which has been licensed to MMT by MTI through Micron Semiconductor Asia. 12

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 41 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 13 of 29

The said information is stored in the form of electronic records in MMT’s computer server which is protected by confidential protection measures, and constitutes the Work under Article 3(1)(1) of the Copyright Act, and the Trade Secret under Article 2 of the Trade Secrets Act. To elaborate, MTI is the owner of said electronic records, and MMT is the quasi-possessor of said electronic records (please refer to Article 966(1) of the Civil Code). Therefore, both MTI and MMT are entitled to file a criminal complaint for the facts of the crime relating to infringement of electronic records. As to UMC, it filed a “criminal complaint” on February 23, 2017 accusing Defendant Kenny Wang of concealing the facts of his illegal use of MMT’s trade secrets from UMC while working for UMC. However, since UMC is neither the owner nor the quasi-possessor of said electronic records, the “criminal complaint” UMC submitted can only be deemed as reporting the criminal conduct.

(II) The Copyright Act and the Trade Secrets Act protect “information”. Such information is valuable and is a kind of property like other tangible goods. Obtaining such information without the owner’s consent would constitute infringement upon the owner’s interest in information property. In addition, “electronic record” mentioned under Article 10(6) of the Criminal Code is defined as records made through the use of electronic, magnetic, optical or other similar means for computer processing. An electronic record is intangible property, and its characteristics include that it is inalienable, inexhaustible and ubiquitous once disclosed. If the information protected under the Copyright Act and the Trade Secrets Act is obtained or possessed without the owner’s consent, the owner loses its control of such trade secret and copyrighted work. And it would definitely impair the owner’s exclusive use of the information and the monopoly value of the trade secret, hence constituting infringement of a property interest. After Defendant JT Ho and Kenny Wang commenced work for MTI’s competitor, i.e. UMC, they still possessed MTI’s trade secrets without justification. Such trade secrets allowed UMC to solve problems when developing DRAM products, and the methods, technologies, processes, and designs developed by UMC would be eventually transferred to Jinhua in Mainland China. Besides, without referring to any physical documents and electronic records and conducting a verification process, it would be almost impossible for an engineer to provide UMC with parameters like “Cell”, “Array” and “Periphery” in the F32 DRAM design rules merely based on memory or experience. Such can be supported by Witness Lucient Jan’s testimony while answering MJIB officer’s questions on February 16, 2017. Therefore, when Defendant Leh-Tian Rong requested on a certain day in

13

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 42 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 14 of 29

July or August 2016 that Defendant Kenny Wang (who worked in the Device Department) provide the parameters of design rules to Ming-De Wei, Defendant Leh-Tian Rong subjectively should have known that the information possessed by Defendant Kenny Wang was illegally obtained from MMT. This point can also be proved by the fact that before MJIB officers searched UMC’s PM2 department on February 7, 2017, Defendant Leh-Tian Rong instructed Defendants Kenny Wang and JT Ho to dispose of the MMT information in their possession. Defendants Kenny Wang and JT Ho argued that the documents and electronic records and paper documents listed in the Criminal Facts column were for their personal research. Defendant Leh-Tian Rong argued that he only asked his subordinate (i.e. Defendant Kenny Wang) to comment on the draft F32 DRAM design rules enacted by UMC. None of their arguments is credible. Defendants Kenny Wang, JT Ho and Leh-Tian Rong did have the intent to infringe upon MTI’s interest and use MTI’s trade secrets in Mainland China.

(III) A provision of Article 13-4 of the Trade Secrets Act requires that “the representative of a juristic person or natural person has made his/her best efforts to prevent a crime from being committed”, which means the person has made sincere efforts to “actively” prevent wrong doings, and its efforts would reasonably prevent the unwanted result. In this case, in order to prove that the three Defendants had promised that they would not disclose their former employer’s confidential information to UMC, and that they had taken the IP education courses provided by UMC to prevent another company’s trade secrets from being brought into UMC, Defendant UMC submitted the photocopies of employment agreements and training materials of Defendants Kenny Wang, JT Ho and Leh-Tian Rong during their employment with UMC. UMC further stated that UMC prohibited use of USBs and that laptops issued by the company cannot connect with the company’s intranet. However, after search and seizure, the prosecutor found out that the above-mentioned electronic records and paper documents obtained by Kenny Wang and JT Ho from MMT were kept in UMC’s PI2 office. In addition, Kenny Wang and JT Ho had continuously used and took said information as reference after resigning from UMC. This shows that apart from executing standard employment agreements with JT Ho, Kenny Wang, and Leh-Tian Rong and conducting regular orientation training, Defendant UMC has not adopted any positive measures to prevent the Defendants from infringing upon other companies’ trade secrets after joining UMC (for example, UMC could periodically audit the information assets in places under its control). Therefore, Defendant UMC’s argument cannot be adopted.

14

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 43 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 15 of 29

III. Laws violated

(I) Defendant JT Ho possessed MTI’s trade secrets with the intention to use the trade secrets in Mainland China and to damage Complainant MTI’s interests. Having failed to delete and destroy such trade secrets upon MTI’s request, JT Ho exceeded the authorization and used such trade secrets. Ho has thus committed the crime prohibited in Article 13-2(1) of the Trade Secrets Act, i.e. violating Subparagraphs 2 and 3 of Paragraph 1 of Article 13-1 with the intent to use in Mainland China. As Defendant JT Ho continuously committed the crime with a single criminal intent, he shall be deemed as committing one crime. Complainant’s attorney Jeanne Wang Esq. stated in the investigation hearing on February 13, 2017 that JT Ho’s misconduct also constituted the crime prohibited under Article 359 of the Criminal Code, i.e. retrieving another’s electronic records without justification and causing harm. However, Witness Yi-Ling Chen testified in the same hearing that MMT did not prohibit an engineer from storing company files in USB drive. Therefore, there is no positive evidence to support the finding that JT Ho obtained the company’s electronic records “without justification” while working for MMT.

(II) Defendant Kenny Wang reproduced and obtained the trade secrets by illegal means with the intent to use the trade secrets in Mainland China and to damage Complainant MTI’s interests. He further used and disclosed such trade secrets after obtaining the same. He also infringed MTI’s copyright. He thus has committed the crime prohibited Paragraph 1 of Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act, i.e. violating Subparagraphs 2 and 3 of Paragraph 1 of Article 13-1 with the intent to use in Mainland China, and also the crime prohibited under Paragraph 1 of Article 91 of the Copyright Act. As Defendant Kenny Wang committed the above crimes with a single criminal intent and single continuous misconduct, he shall be punished for the crime with the harsher penalties, which is the crime of Paragraph 1 of Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act. Complainants MTI and MMT also asserted that Defendant Kenney Wang has committed the crime prohibited under Article 317 (disclosing industrial and commercial secrets acquired in the course of business), Article 318-1 (disclosing secret know-how via computer), Paragraph 1 of Article 342 (critical breach of trust), and Article 359 (obtaining another’s electronic records without justification and causing harm) of the Criminal Code. However, Articles 13-1 to 13-4 of the Trade Secret Act were newly enacted on January 31, 2013, and the legislative reason is that Articles 317, 318-1, 318-2, 342, 359 are insufficient to protect trade secrets (please refer to the related legislation documents of the 14th meeting of the second 15

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 44 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 16 of 29

session of the 8th Legislative Yuan). Therefore, the articles in the Trade Secret Act shall take priority over those articles in the Criminal Code. Based on the principle that special laws should take priority over general laws, the Trade Secret Act shall be applied. In addition, Defendant Kenny Wang made critical statements related to the case while being interrogated, which led the prosecutor to be able to indict Co-Defendant Leh-Tian Rong for the crime described in Item 5 of the Criminal Facts Section. With the prosecutor’s advanced consent, please reduce or waive Defendant Kenny Wang’s punishment for committing the crime under Paragraph 1 of Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Witness Protection Act.

(III) Defendant Leh-Tian Rong intended to use the trade secrets in Mainland China and damage the complainant MTI’s interests. Although he knew that the trade secrets possessed by Defendant Kenny Wang were illegally obtained, he still used said trade secrets. Defendant Leh-Tian Rong committed the crime prohibited under Paragraph 1 of Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act, i.e. violating Subparagraph 4 of Paragraph 1 of Article 13-1 of the Trade Secrets Act with the intent to use in Mainland China.

(IV) Because Defendant UMC’s employees, i.e. JT Ho, Kenny Wang and Leh-Tian Rong committed the crime prohibited under Article 13-2(1) of the Trade Secrets Act in the course of performing their job duties, please punish by imposing on Defendant UMC the criminal fine mentioned under Article 13-2(1) of the Trade Secrets Act pursuant to the former part of Article 13-4 of the Trade Secrets Act.

IV. Confiscation:

Please confiscate the Electronic Record A and Paper Document B illegally obtained by Defendant JT Ho and the Electronic Record C and Paper Document D illegally obtained by Defendant Kenny Wang pursuant to the former part of Article 38-1(1) of the Criminal Code. Pursuant to Article 38(2) of the Criminal Code, please confiscate the articles listed in Table 2, Items 3 & 6 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 3, Item 16 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 5, and Item 20 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 6, which were articles owned and used by Defendant Kenny Wang for committing the crime. Pursuant to Article 38(2) of the Criminal Code, please confiscate the articles listed in Item 36 of the Confiscated-Property Storage in Table 6 and items shown in Table 7, which were articles owned and used by Defendant JT Ho for committing the crime.

16

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 45 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 17 of 29

V. The prosecutor hereby indicts the Defendants in accordance with Article 251(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedures.

Respectfully submitted to Taiwan Taichung District Court

August 8, 2017 The Prosecutor: Li-Wei Chen August 31, 2017 Clerk˖Yi-Qing Chen (Signature: Yi-Qing Chen)

Table 1 Date of action: September 29, 2016 Place of action: Investigation Bureau, Taipei city Subject of action: Micron Memory Taiwan Co., Ltd Basis of action: Article 133(3) of the Criminal Code Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage A-1 1 Laptop computer used by 1 unit This is the computer used by Kenny Wang Kenny Wang during his service in MTI

Table 2 Date of action: February 7, 2017 Place of action: Premises at Nantun District and 18 Cheng Lane and surrounding area Acted by: Kenny Wang Basis of action: Search warrant ShengSouZi No. 372 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark no. of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage F-1 2 Laptop computer 1 unit 1. After reviewing, the (including cable) Investigation Bureau copied the electronic records in the laptop computer as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030- 25-10ㄨ. 2. After review on 13 February 2017, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that the electromagnetic records stored in the path below are 17

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 46 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 18 of 29

MTI’s trade secrets:

Table 3 Date of action: February 7, 2017 Place of action: Premises at 9 of 11th floor, No. 201 Section 1, Wenxin South 5th Road, Nantun District, Taichung and surrounding area Subject of action: Kenny Wang Basis of action: Search warrant ShengSouZi No. 372 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage D-1 1 USB 1 unit 1. After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau copied the electronic records in the USB as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-06ㄨ. 2. After review on 13 February 2017, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that the electronic records stored in the path below are MTI’s trade secrets:

(continued)

D-2 4 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau copied the electronic records in the seized item as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-07ㄨ. D-3 5 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau copied the electronic records in the seized item as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage 18

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 47 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 19 of 29

under USBㄨ106030-25-08ㄨ. D-4 6 Acer laptop computer 1 set 1. After reviewing, the (including cable) Investigation Bureau copied the electronic records in the seized item as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-09ㄨ. 2. After review on 13 February 2017, witness Yi- Ling Chen confirmed that the electronic records stored in the path below are MTI’s trade secrets:

D-5 7 Employment Agreement 1 copy D-6 8 Passbook (Bank SinoPac 1 copy Hsinchu branch, account number: 018004001551741, name of account holder: Kenny Wang)

Table 4 Date of action: February 7, 2017 Place of action: Limited to premises which are Kenny Wang’s personal apartment on 1-9/F Nos. 428 and 430 Longmujing Road, Shanhua District, Tainan City Subject of action: Kenny Wang Basis of action: Search warrant Sheng Sou Zi No. 372 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage C-1-1 to 9 Information about Kenny 3 copies After review in the course of C-1-3 Wang being interviewed by the investigator, witnesses Yi- Ling Chen and Lucient Jan confirmed that document C- 1-2 (Title: Peripheral Design Rules for DR25nm) comprises MTI’s trade secrets. C-2 10 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau found that the USB could not be read due to damage, so no related information is available.

19

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 48 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 20 of 29

Table 5 Date of action: February 7, 2017 Place of action: No. 57 Nanke 3rd Road, Xinshi District, Tainan City and surrounding area (Kenny Wang’s product manager office in UMC’s Second Factory Area of Fab 12A) Subject of action: Kenny Wang Basis of action: Search warrant Sheng Sou Zi No. 375 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage A-1 11 Organization Chart of PM2 1 sheet A-2-1 12 Documents 3 copies 1. After review in the A-2-2 course of interviewed by A-2-3 the investigator, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they are not MMT’s documents. 2. After reviewing document A-2-2 in the course of being interviewed by the investigator on 16 February 2017, witness Lucient Jan confirmed that the parameters contained in the documents bear similarities to the parameters contained in document C-1-2. A-3 13 UMC personnel data card 1 copy A-4 14 Kenny Wang’s notebook 1 copy After review, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they contain no trade secrets of MMT. A-5 15 Handwritten notes 1 copy After review, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they contain no trade secrets of MMT. (continued) A-6 16 Kenny Wang’s mobile phone 1 1. The Investigation Bureau’s (No.: 0911-834291) report of review is included as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-01ㄨ. 2. Kenny Wang confessed that it contains MMT’s information. 20

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 49 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 21 of 29

A-7 17 Kenny Wang’s mobile phone 1 After reviewing, the (No.: 0965702303) Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030- 25-02ㄨ.

A-8 18 The office-use laptop computer 1 1. After reviewing, the (including cable) distributed by Investigation Bureau United Microelectronics included the electronic Corporation to Kenny Wang records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-03ㄨ. 2. After review on February 13, 2017, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that the path below contains MTI’s trade secrets:

A-9 19 USB 1 After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030- 25-04ㄨ.

Table 6 Date of action: February 9, 2017 Place of action: Third investigation court of Taiwan Taichung District Prosecutors Office Subject of action: Shu-Han Huang Basis of action: Article 133(3) of the Criminal Code Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage 1 34 Laptop computer of the HP 1 unit Owned by UMC. After brand (UMC label: reviewing, the Investigation UMC030761) Bureau copied the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-12 ㄨ. (continued) 2 20 USB (Silver PNY128GB) 1 unit 1. Owned by Kenny Wang. After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau copied the electronic 21

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 50 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 22 of 29

records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-13ㄨ. 2. After review in the course of being interviewed by the investigator, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they contain electronic records of trade secrets of MTI. 36 USB (Kingston brand) 1 unit 1. Owned by Kenny Wang. After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-14ㄨ. 2. After review in the course of being interviewed by the investigator, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they contain electronic records of trade secrets of MTI. 3 21 Paper materials 1 copy Owned by Kenny Wang, with sticker depicting no. 1 on the paper. 22 Paper document 1 copy Owned by Kenny Wang, with sticker depicting no. 9 on the paper. After review in the course of interviewed by the investigator, witness Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they are trade secrets of MTI. 35 Paper document 13 1. Owned by Kenny Wang, copies with stickers depicting nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 on the paper. 2. Paper documents numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 1 and ELPIDA ECD-DPB-1111 and ECD-DPB-1076 in archive numbered 15. After review in the course of being interviewed by the investigator, Yi-Ling Chen confirmed that they are trade secrets of MTI. 4 23 Laptop computer 1 unit Owned by Kenny Wang. 22

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 51 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 23 of 29

5 37 Operation plan of Elpida – 1 copy RGM Houli Technology R&D Center

Table 7 Date of action: February 8, 2017 Place of action: Room 657 No. 63 Dashun 6th Road., Xinshi District, Tainan City Subject of action: JT Ho Basis of action: Article 133(3) of the Criminal Code Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage 1 25 USB 1 unit 1. After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-11ㄨ. 2. After review in the course of being interviewed by the investigator, witness Yi- Ling Chen confirmed that they contain electronic records of trade secrets of MTI.

Table 8 Date of action: February 14, 2017 Place of action: No. 57 Nanke 3rd Road, Xinshi District, Tainan City (Kenny Wang’s personal office in PM2 of New Business Development Center in UMC’s Second Factory Area of Fab 12A) Subject of action: JT Ho Basis of action: Search warrant Sheng Sou Zi No. 421 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage 2B-1-1 26 Notebook of JT Ho 4 copies to 2B-1- 4 2B-2 27 MMT letters 1 copy 2B-3 28 Employment Agreement 1 copy 2B-4 29 Mobile phone of JT Ho (Nos: 1 unit After reviewing, the 0910411131, 0965280938) Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-15 ㄨ. 2B-5 30 Miscellaneous record of JT 1 sheet Ho 2B-6 31 Laptop computer of JT Ho 1 unit After reviewing, the 23

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 52 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 24 of 29

(Asus brand) Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-16 ㄨ. 2B-7 32 Contact information 2 sheets 2B-8 33 USB of JT Ho 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-17 ㄨ.

Table 9 Date of action: February 14, 2017 Place of action: No. 57 Nanke 3rd Road, Xinshi District, Tainan City (Leh-Tian Rong’s personal office in PM2 of New Business Development Center in UMC’s Second Factory Area of Fab 12A) Subject of action: Leh-Tian Rong Basis of action: Search warrant Sheng Sou Zi No. 416 of 2017 issued by Taichung District Court, Taiwan Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage 2A-1-1 39 iPhone handset 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-18 ㄨ. 2A-1-2 40 iPhone handset 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-19 ㄨ. 2A-2 41 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-20 ㄨ. 2A-3 42 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-21 ㄨ. 2A-4 43 USB 1 unit After reviewing, the

24

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 53 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 25 of 29

Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030-25-22 ㄨ. 2A-5-1 44 Notebooks 2 copies 2A-5-2 2A-6-1 45 Documents 2 copies

(continued) 2A-6-2 2A-7 Confidentiality Agreement 1 copy The prosecutor considered no need of seizure, and instructed the New Taipei City Investigation Bureau to return it to Leh-Tian Rong on February 14, 2017. 2A-8 46 Leh-Tian Rong’s ACER laptop 1 unit After reviewing, the computer Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ106030- 25-23ㄨ. 2A-9 Seating plan 1 sheet The prosecutor considered no need of seizure, and instructed the New Taipei City Investigation Bureau to return it to Leh-Tian Rong on February 14, 2017. 2A-10 47 Leh-Tian Rong’s USB which 1 unit 1. After reviewing, the contains business information Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-24ㄨ. 2. The prosecutor considered no need of seizure after the inspection, and returned it to Leh-Tian Rong on April 25, 2017 in the form of disposal order

Table 10 Date of action: February 14, 2017 Place of action: 5 of 8th floor, No. 6 Dashun 3rd Road 112, Xinshi District, Tainan City Subject of action: Leh-Tian Rong Basis of action: Search conducted pursuant to Article 131-1 of the Criminal Code with consent of the target of search Item no. Item no. of Name of seized item Quantity Remark

25

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 54 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 26 of 29

of Confiscated- seized Property record Storage 2C 38 HTC handset 1 unit After reviewing, the Investigation Bureau included the electronic records as Item 48 in the Confiscated- Property Storage under USB ㄨ10603-25-25ㄨ.

Table 11 USB provided by MJIB Item no. of seized Name of seized item Quantity Remark record 24 USB (Black 64GB) 1 unit 1. These are information obtained from Kenny Wang’s Google Drive account during his interrogation by the Investigation Bureau of New Taipei City on February 14, 2017. 2. After review in the course of interview by the investigator, Lucient Jan confirmed that the GDS file in the Google Drive bears similarities to MTI’s Design Rules of 25nm DRAM products. 3. The file in the USB has been copied as Item 48 in the Confiscated-Property Storage under USBㄨ 106030-25-26ㄨ. 48 USB (ITB Black) 1 unit It contains the electronic records to be reviewed by MJIB for the case 106030.

Table 12 Complainant Agents Accused Micron Memory Lawyer Jeanne Wang Kenny Wang Taiwan Co., Ltd Lawyer Lin Liang Rong (terminated on 2 September 2016) JT Ho Lawyer Max Lee UMC Lawyer Chen Xi Xian Micron Lawyer Jeanne Wang Technology, Inc. Lawyer Lin Liang Rong (terminated on September 2,

26

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 55 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 27 of 29

2016) Lawyer Peng Jian Ren

Table 13 Complainant Agents Accused UMC Lawyer Che-Hung Chen Kenny Wang Lawyer Jia-Kun Liu (terminated on June 19, 2017) Lawyer En-Xu Huang

Laws violated: Article 13-1 of the Trade Secrets Act Anyone who has one of the following circumstances done with the intent to obtain illegal gains for oneself or third persons, or damage interests of trade-secret owners shall be liable to imprisonment or detention of no more than 5 years and a fine more than TWD1 million but less than TWD 10 million for: 1. Obtaining trade secrets by stealing, infringement, fraud, threat or unauthorized copying or other illegal means or using and disclosing the same after obtaining them. 2. Copying, using, or disclosing known trade secrets or possessing trade secrets without authorization or beyond the scope of authorization. 3. Failure to delete, destroy or conceal trade secrets after being instructed by the trade- secret owners to have them deleted or destroyed. 4. Obtaining, using, or disclosing trade secrets from another person knowing that the person knows or possesses the trade secrets from the above three circumstances.

Any attempt of the above shall be subject to penalty.

For fines, if the perpetrator obtains gains which exceed the maximum amount of fine, discretion should be exercised to increase the fine to an amount not greater than three times the gains obtained.

Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act Anyone who attempt to use trade secrets in foreign countries, Mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau in violation of one of the said crimes of Paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall be liable to imprisonment of more than one year but less than 10 years and a fine above TWD3 million but less than TWD 50 million.

Any attempt of the above shall be subject to penalty.

27

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 56 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 28 of 29

For fines, if the perpetrator obtains gains which exceed the maximum amount of the fine, discretion should be exercised to increase the fine to an amount not greater than two to ten times the gains obtained.

Article 13-4 of the Trade Secrets Act If a representative of a legal entity, or an agent of a legal entity or a natural person, an employee or other contractors violate Article 13-1 or 12-2 for purposes of conducting business, besides punishing the perpetrator pursuant to the related Article, the legal entity or natural person shall also be subject to a fine unless the representative of the legal entity or natural person has done their utmost to stop the perpetrator’s act.

Article 91 of the Copyright Act Anyone who infringes IP rights of others by unauthorized copying of a work shall be liable to imprisonment or detention of less than 3 years and optional or compulsory fine of no more than TWD750,000.

Anyone who infringes upon IP rights of others by copying the work unauthorized with an intent to sell or lease the same shall be liable to imprisonment of more than 6 months but less than 5 years and optional or compulsory fine of no more than TWD200,000 but less than TWD2 million.

Anyone who commits the said crime by copying the data on CDs shall be liable to imprisonment of more than 6 months but less than 5 years and compulsory fine of more than TWD500,000 but less than TWD5 million.

Personal reference or reasonable use of the works shall not constitute infringement upon copyrights.

28

CERT. ULG

Exhibit 2 Page 57 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 29 of 29 United Language Group 3 Columbus Circle 14th Floor New York. NY 101 19 ULG +1 888.601 .9814 UNITED LANGUAGE GROUP [email protected]

State of New York ) ) ss: County of New York )

Certificate of Accuracy

This is to certify that the attached translation is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, a true and accurate translation of the attached document, carried out by translators competent to translate from Chinese into English.

Dated: November 27, 201 7 ~~~ Senior Project Manager - Legal Translations United Language Group

Sworn to and signed before me, this 27'11 day of November 20 17 S2fl Notary Public

' --· _,.~.... -~ s.:..1.;~J CAi ldl I . ~. J ~ ;,:bile, State ol New York ~·o. 01 CA6275260 ~ Qualified In New York County .:u , Ccmmlss!on ExpiresJ an 22, 2~

Exhibit 2 Page 58 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-3 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:17-cv-06932-MMC Document 1-3 Filed 12/05/17 Page 2 of 2