DOCSLIB.ORG

O~Y/~~

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
O~Y/~~ JUNE LAGMAY · 'ny OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES HOLLY L. WOLCOTT ROOM 224, 200 N. SPRING STREET EXECUTIVE OFFICER LOS ANGELES, CALifORNIA 90012 (213) 978·1099 FAX: (213) 978·1130 TDD/TTY (213) 978·1132 MIRANDA C. PASTER ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA ACTING D!VISION HEAD MAYOR BALLOT TABULATION RESULTS FOR THE MODIFICATION AND EXPANSION OF THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (CF NO. 10-1083) SECTION 1. Results of the Proposition 218 ballot tabulation, pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution, Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Section 53753 of the California Government Code: Ballots Cast Weighted Value Percent of Ballots Cast Supporting ("Yes") ballots: 155 $ 315,215.26 49.69% Opposing ("No") ballots: 40 $ 319,097.41 50.31% (NOTE: Five (5) ballots were received after the close of the public hearing which was held Tuesday June 7, 2011. Ballots received after the close of the public hearing cannot be counted.) The weighted value of the opposing ballots exceeds the weighted value of the supporting ballots. SECTION 2. Protests received, pursuant to Section 53753(d) of the California Government Code: Number of valid protests received 0 CONCLUSION: The tabulated value of the opposing ballots cast exceeds the tabulated value of the supporting ballots cast. A majority protest, pursuant to Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution, Section 36623 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Section 53753(e)(2) of the California Government Code, is found to exist and the proposed modification may not be authorized by the City Council at this time. BY: o~y/~~ D~).lty city <JI?i"k ""'',J·"<-'.::::. '• y-- 'J { •-1&~.-.;_ '"l !f Date ' AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY • AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Historic Downtown Los Angeles 2009-2013 Los Angeles City Clerk Proposition 218 Ballot Tabulation -Official Results Administrative Services Division June 07, 2011 Special Assessments Section Business Improvement District Unit No. Property Owner Name APN 2011Asmt Vote YES NO Comments 1 400 Broadway Plaza LLC 5149-024-019 $2,352.79 N $2,352.79 2 400 Broadway Plaza LLC 5149-024-020 $3,362.72 N $3,362.72 3 400 Broadway Plaza LLC S149-024-021 $6,419.31 N $6,419.31 4 400 Broadway Plaza LLC S149-024-022 $1,084.40 N $1,084.40 5 424 BROADWAY LLC 5149-Q24-Q09 $5,694.80 6 445 South Broadway LLC S149-026-002 $4,622.06 7 449 S BROADWAY 5149-026-001 $15,823.62 8 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-011 $227.86 9 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-013 $197.00 10 5TH ST LOFT LLC ' 5149-002-017 $204.12 11 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-020 $223.11 12 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-021 $194.63 13 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-024 $211.24 14 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-002-031 $118.68 """- 15 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-002-032 $159.03 16 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-035 $168.52 17 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-037 $227.86 18 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-002-038 $211.24 19 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-002-040 $175.64 20 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-045 $154.28 21 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-057 $118.68 22 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-060 $111.56 23 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-063 $227.86 24 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-068 $189.88 25 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-069 $204.12 26 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-071 $154.28 -=27 5TH ST LOFT LlC 5149-002-072 $223.11 28 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-Q02-074 $211.24 29 5TH ST LOFT LlC 5149-Q02-076 $211.24 - 30 5TH ST LOFT lLC 5149-002-083 $118.68 ··- 31 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-Q02-Q88 $123.42 32 5TH ST LOFT LlC 5149-002-089 $227.86 33 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-091 $197.00 34 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-Q97 $154.28 35 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-Q02-098 $223.11 36 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-Q02-Q99 $194.63 37 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-Q02-100 $211.24 38 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-109 $118.68 Page 1of31 Historic Downtown Los Angeles 2009-2013 Los Angeles City Clerk Proposition 218 Ballot Tabulation -Official Results Administrative Services Division June 07, 2011 Special Assessments Section Business Improvement District Unit No. Property Owner Name APN 2011Asmt Vote YES NO Comments 39 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-113 $168.52 40 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-114 $123.42 41 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-115 $227.86 42 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-117 $197.00 43 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-118 $175.64 44 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-124 $223.11 45 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-138 $111.56 46 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-140 $123.42 47 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-141 $227.86 48 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-145 $159.03 49 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-149 $154.28 50 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-151 $194.63 51 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-156 $159.03 . 52 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-159 $154.28 53 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-163 $232.61 54 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-164 $111.56 55 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-165 $168.52 56 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-171 $159.03 57 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-172 $189.88 58 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-191 $168.52 59 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-193 $429.61 60 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-194 $320.43 61 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-195 $310.93 62 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-196 $645.60 63 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-197 $460.46 64 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-198 $807.00 65 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-199 $339.41 66 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-200 $638.48 67 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-002-201 $474.71 68 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-016 $0.00 69 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-017 $187.51 70 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-018 $232.61 71 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-019 $187.51 72 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-020 $230.23 73 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-021 $159.03 74 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-022 $182.76 75 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-023 $168.28 ·-- 76 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-024 $284.82 Page 2 of31 Historic Downtown Los Angeles 2009-2013 los Angeles City Clerk Proposition 218 Ballot Tabulation -Official Results Administrative SeJVices Division June 07, 2011 Special Assessments Section Business Improvement District Unit No. Property Owner Name APN 2011Asmt Vote YES NO Comments 77 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-033-025 $159.03 78 5TH ST LOFT llC 5149-033-026 $218.36 79 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-027 $275.33 80 5TH 5T lOFT LLC 5149-033-028 $227.86 81 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-029 $211.24 82 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-030 $197.00 83 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-031 $175.64 84 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-032 $159.03 85 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-035 $161.40 86 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-049 $159.03 87 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-052 $168.52 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-054 88 --- $227.86 89 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-056 $197.00 90 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-058 $159.03 91 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-065 $211.24 92 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-067 $211.24 93 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-071 $270.58 94 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-075 $159.03 95 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-076 $232.61 96 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-080 $227.86 ·-- 97 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-084 $159.03 98 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-085 $189.88 . 99 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-089 $223.11 100 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-090 $194.63 101 5TH ST LOFT LLC 5149-033-092 $156.65 5TH ST lOFT LLC 102 . 5149-033-095 $159.03 103 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-102 $232.61 104 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-103 $111.56 - 105 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-104 $168.52 106 5TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-033-105 $123.42 107 616SOUTH BROADWAY 5144-002-019 $5,620.24 108 633 BROADWAY ASSOC 5144-003-013 $5,358.73 109 635 S BROADWAY PTSHP 5144-003-012 $2,304.94 110 640 SOUTH MAIN STREET PTRS LLC 5148-021-002 $2,012.62 111 640 SOUTH MAIN STREET PTRS LLC 5148-021-010 $10,705.27 112 646 SOUTH BROADWAY ASSOC 5144-002-022 $5,003.56 113 6TH ST lOFT LLC 5149-036-017 $16,623.18 N $16,623.18 114 700 SO BROADWAY BLDG LLC 5144-015-053 $12,224.89 N $12,224.89 Page 3 of31 Historic Downtown Los Angeles 2009-2013 Los Angeles City Clerk Proposition 218 Ballot Tabulation- Official Results Administrative Services Division June 07, 2011 Special Assessments Section Business Improvement District Unit No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Journal of Law and Policy Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 11 2010 Smash or Save: The ewN York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation Rebecca Birmingham Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Rebecca Birmingham, Smash or Save: The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J. L. & Pol'y (2010). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol19/iss1/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. SMASH OR SAVE: THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ACT AND NEW CHALLENGES TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION Rebecca Birmingham* “[W]e will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed. Ada Louise Huxtable, Farewell to Penn Station”1 INTRODUCTION A demolition crew lops a meticulously maintained cornice off an architecturally unique building.2 A church begs for permission to erect a soaring office tower next to a turn-of-the-century chapel.3 A pop star wields her considerable clout to finagle a dispensation to install historically inappropriate windows in her Brooklyn brownstone.4 These are just a few examples of the most recent challenges * J.D. Candidate, Brooklyn Law School, 2011; B.A., Individualized Study, New York University, 2008. Many thanks to the editorial staff at the Journal of Law and Policy for their input and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Department of Buildings Architectural Drawings and Plans for Lower Manhattan, Circa 1866-1978 Collection No
    NEW YORK CITY MUNICIPAL ARCHIVES 31 CHAMBERS ST., NEW YORK, NY 10007 Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Collection No. REC 0074 Processing, description, and rehousing by the Rolled Building Plans Project Team (2018-ongoing): Amy Stecher, Porscha Williams Fuller, David Mathurin, Clare Manias, Cynthia Brenwall. Finding aid written by Amy Stecher in May 2020. NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 1 NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Summary Record Group: RG 025: Department of Buildings Title of the Collection: Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan Creator(s): Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Bureau of Buildings; Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Housing and Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department for the Survey and Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Fire Department. Bureau of Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department Date: circa 1866-1978 Abstract: The Department of Buildings requires the filing of applications and supporting material for permits to construct or alter buildings in New York City. This collection contains the plans and drawings filed with the Department of Buildings between 1866-1978, for the buildings on all 958 blocks of Lower Manhattan, from the Battery to 34th Street, as well as a small quantity of material for blocks outside that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting New York City: Buyers Manual
    .S97 Copy 1 VISITING Price Twenty Five Cetvts :>o/:^^^^i>^%' ^ X -' r*. v/% e^ r^ ^ Q..^i^ &Sis'*- JOHN WANAMAKER ore maintains the distinctive character it had in Mr. Stewart's lifetime, to which has been added the Hfe and spirit of Mr. Stewart's old friend, its present owner, whose pride and signature govern all our undertakings in riew York as well as Philadelphia. Mr. Stewart's first quality of merchandise A fair price and but one price An art in Storekeeping distinctly different from a mere warehouse of merchandise. A wide civic and national vision— fixed a famous leadership that has not died and never will. The A. T. S. and J. W. flags of business principles are nailed to the mast as business signals to the public. [Signed] "^mcm^ v- c I " /- >r>>£ g)CI.A627601 NOV -5 1921 Ir r / ', VISITING NEW YORK CITY PRICE 25c. 192 1 Henry Sweetsson, Inc., is organized under the laws of the State of New ' York, to act as purchasing agents, brokers and advisors to hotels, clubs, res- taurants, industries or institutions interested in feeding and housing problems. Coincident with its activities and field of endeavors its offices have be- come a rendezvous for out-of-town visitors and buyers in quest of special infor- mation regarding the world's largest market, where to sleep, eat and spend iheir spare hours, as well as what, where and when to purchase supplies and equipment—not only within our corporate limitations but many times entirely foreign to the scope of our activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleventh Street Methodist Episcopal Chapel
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 14, 2010, Designation List 433 LP- 2398 ELEVENTH STREET METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHAPEL (later People’s Home Church and Settlement, now The Father’s Heart Church), 545-547 East 11th Street, Manhattan Built, 1867-68; architect, William Field and Son; altered, 1900-1901, Jallade and Barber Landmark Site: Borough of Borough Tax Map Block 405, Lot 39 On March 23, 2010, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Eleventh Street Methodist Episcopal Chapel (later People’s Home Church and Settlement, now The Father’s Heart Church) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing was duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. There were 5 speakers in favor of designation, including the owner of the building, the owner’s architect, City Council Member Rosie Mendez, representatives of Lower East Side Preservation Initiative, Historic Districts Council and the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. The Commission received one letter from the Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in support of the designation. Summary The Eleventh Street Methodist Episcopal Chapel (later People’s Home Church and Settlement, now The Father’s Heart Church) was constructed in 1867-68 to the design of prominent architects William Field and Son. The firm is best known as the architects of affordable apartment houses and this is one of the few known houses of worship that they designed. By the mid-19th century the Gothic Revival style had become the standard for church buildings in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 1 of 209 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-12097 (SCC) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Victoria X. Tran, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned cases. On February 9, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached here as Exhibit B: • Disclosure Statement for Debtors’ Joint Plan Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (including Debtors' Joint Plan Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as Exhibit A) (Docket No. 615) • Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Approving (A) the Adequacy of Information in the Disclosure Statement, (B) Solicitation and Voting Procedures, and (C) Certain Dates with Respect to Plan Confirmation, and (II) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 616) • Notice of Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Approving (A) the Adequacy of Information in the Disclosure Statement, (B) Solicitation and Voting Procedures, and (C) Certain Dates with Respect to Plan Confirmation, and (II) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 617) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ___________________________ 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are Century 21 Department Stores LLC (4073), L.I.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of the STATE of NEW YORK COUNTY of NEW YORK ------X TIMOTHY BROWN, Index No.110334/10
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x TIMOTHY BROWN, Index No.110334/10 Petitioner, AMDENDED VERIFIED PETITION -against- THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION, MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, Mayor of the City of New York, THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS, SOHO PROPERTIES INC., JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE, Respondents. -----------------------------------------------------------------------x Petitioner, by his attorneys, the AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE and JACK L. LESTER, ESQ. for the Petition herein, allege as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This proceeding concerns the fate of 45-51 Park Place in Manhattan (“the Building”), an iconic structure that symbolizes American capitalism and perseverance in the face of terrorism. 2. The Building, which connects two structures, 45-47 Park Place and 49-51 Park Place, survived a direct hit on September 11, 2001 and is part of the area now known as Ground Zero, less than three blocks from the site of the former World Trade Center. 3. The Building faces imminent demolition, as the land use process of New York City threatens to do what terrorists failed to accomplish and destroy a building that has been under consideration for landmark status for over twenty (20) years. 1 4. During that time, upon information and belief, the preservation community as well as the local Manhattan Community Board #1 (the “CB”) have advocated and beseeched the New York City Landmarks Commission (the “LPC”) to consider
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Board Meeting Tuesday, November 24, 2020 6:00 PM
    Monthly Board Meeting Tuesday, November 24, 2020 6:00 PM Live Remote Meeting - https://live.mcb1.nyc Tammy Meltzer, Chairperson Alice Blank, Vice Chair Lucian Reynolds, District Manager Lucy Acevedo, Community Coordinator Diana Switaj, Director of Planning and Land Use Ramesh Beharry and Jennifer Maldonado, Consultants CB1's OFFICE CONTACT Manhattan Community Board 1 1 Centre Street, Room 2202 North New York, NY 10007 Tel: (212) 669-7970 Website: nyc.gov/mcb1 Email: [email protected] The Manhattan Community Board 1 office is closed until further notice. Please use [email protected] as the principal means of communication with Community Board 1 staff who are working remotely to every extent possible. Manhattan Community Board 1 Public Session Comments by members of the public (6 PM – 7 PM) (1-2 minutes per speaker) Manhattan Community Board 1 Business Session A. Adoption of October 2020 minutes B. District Manager’s Report – L. Reynolds C. Chairperson’s Report – T. Meltzer MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 1 DISTRICT MANAGER’S REPORT November 2020 250 Water Street ZFCR Text Amendment Change Manhattan Community Board 1 ZONING CHANGE Chairperson’s Report September 2020 Updates NEW UPDATES…. • Letters to/from the Chair this month: • SLA re: Submersive LLC - 18 William Street/20 Exchange Place • DOT letter re: Cargo Bikes • 52 William Street: As of today, there is no ruling from the judge. The TRO for moving the group of men from The Lucern remains. • The city is continuing Design Plans for BBJ. • Next Hudson River Advisory Board Meeting is Tuesday - 12/8 to be held virtually. • Public Engagement process.
    [Show full text]
  • ¨§¦64 ¨§¦65 ¨§¦24 ¨§¦75 ¨§¦71
    FEDERAL HISTORIC TAX CREDIT PROJECTS Kentucky A total of 463 Federal Historic Tax Credit projects (certified by the National Park Service) and $153,987,246 in federal Historic Tax Credits between fiscal year 2001 through 2020, leveraged an estimated $885,426,662 in total development. Data source: National Park Service, 2020 Newport Ludlow 9811 Burlington Covington Warsaw 8 ¦¨§71 Maysville La Grange Cynthiana Flemingsburg Ashland Georgetown Paris 148 Shelbyville 37 6 5 Carlisle 64 Louisville Middletown ¦¨§ Frankfort Lexington 2 12 65 26 ¦¨§ Lawrenceburg 5 Mount South Winchester Sterling Bloomfield Hill 5 Harrodsburg Owensboro4 Bardstown Irvine 4 Danville Elizabethtown4 Springfield2 Richmond 2 Campton 3 3 Mitchellsburg Paint Lick 2 6 Beattyville Jackson Buffalo Stanford McKee Pikesville Canmer 75 2 ¦¨§ Elkhorn City Munfordville Greensburg Jenkins 18 3 Princeton Park City Glasgow Somerset Paducah 9 2 Edmonton ¦¨§24 Bowling Green Hopkinsville Russellville Oak Grove Scottsville Guthrie Fulton Federal Historic Tax Credit Projects 1 6 - 10 2 - 5 11 and over Provided by the National Trust for Historic Preservation 0 12.5 25 50 75 and the Historic Tax Credit Coalition Miles R For more information, contact Shaw Sprague, NTHP Vice President for Government Relations | (202) 588-6339 | [email protected] or Patrick Robertson, HTCC Executive Director | (202) 302-2957 | [email protected] Kentucky Historic Tax Credit Projects, FY 2001-2020 Project Name Address City Year Qualified Project Use Expenditures Harbor Hill 3700 Landsdowne Drive
    [Show full text]
  • Pier 40 Air Rights Appraisal
    APPRAISAL REPORT of 200,000 Square Feet of Air Rights Generated by Hudson River Park Pier 40 For Use by 550 Washington Street New York, New York SUBMITTED TO Hudson River Park Trust c/o Judith M. Gallent, Esq. Bryan Cave LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 April 29, 2016 Hudson River Park Trust c/o Judith M. Gallent, Esq. Bryan Cave LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Re: 200,000 Square Feet of Air Rights Generated by Hudson River Park Pier 40 Block 656, Lot 1 New York, New York For Use by 550 Washington Street Block 596, Lot 1 New York, New York Dear Ms. Gallent: In accordance with your request, we have prepared an appraisal report of the above captioned 200,000 square feet of air rights, henceforth referred to as the “subject property air rights.” This report has been prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. The air rights that are the subject of this report are those air rights generated by Pier 40, legally identified as Block 656 Lot 1 on the NYC Assessor’s map, and available to be transferred to those eligible properties located along West Street including 550 Washington Street. The client of this report, the Hudson River Park Trust (HRPT), may enter into negotiations to transfer air rights from Pier 40 to 550 Washington Street. Based on our review of the eligible receiving sites under the Hudson River Park Act, as later detailed within this appraisal, only 550 Washington Street would be eligible to receive a transfer of air rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribeca Was Originally Developed in the Early 19Th Century As a Residential Neighborhood Close to the City’S Center in Lower Manhattan
    A GUIDE TO HISTORIC NEW YORK CITY NEIGHBORHOODS T RIBECA ManhaTTan The Historic Districts Council is New York’s citywide advocate for historic buildings and neighborhoods. The Six to Celebrate program annually identifies six historic New York City neighborhoods that merit preservation as priorities for HDC’s advocacy and consultation over a yearlong period. The six, chosen from applications submitted by community organizations, are selected on the basis of the architectural and historic merit of the area, the level of threat to the neighborhood, the strength and willingness of the local advocates, and the potential for HDC’s preservation support to be meaningful. HDC works with these neighborhood partners to set and reach pres- ervation goals through strategic planning, advocacy, outreach, programs and publicity. The core belief of the Historic Districts Council is that preservation and enhancement of New York City’s historic resources—its neighborhoods, buildings, parks and public spaces—are central to the continued success of the city. The Historic Districts Council works to ensure the preservation of these resources and uphold the New York City Landmarks Law and to further the preservation ethic. This mission is accomplished through ongoing programs of assistance to more than 500 community and neighborhood groups and through public-policy initiatives, publications, educational outreach and sponsorship of community events. Six to Celebrate is generously supported by The New York Community Trust. Additional support for Six to Celebrate is provided by the New York State Council on the Arts with the support of Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature and by public funds from the New York City Depart- ment of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council and New York City Councilmembers Margaret Chin, Inez Dickens, Daniel Garodnick, Vincent Gentile, Sara Gonzalez, Stephen Levin and Rosie Mendez.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Tour of Tribeca
    Interesting Facts: Tribeca was New York City’s first developed residential neighborhood. The A.T. Stewart Store at 280 Broadway constructed in 1845 is considered to be the world’s first true department store. The first elevated railway tracks were demonstrated on Greenwich Street in 1867. In 1870, about three decades before theadvent of the modern day subway, an experimental tubular car invention was designed that was propelled by compressed air. The trial car and tunnel was constructed under Broadway between Warren and Murray Streets. Rolling metal security shudders were invented and patented for the design of the Cary WALKING TOUR OF Building on Chambers and Church Street. TRIBECA’S HISTORIC Many streets of Tribeca still contain original sidewalks made of large granite slabs and ARCHITECTURE cobblestone roadways. Often commercial buildings were outfitted Sponsored by: with small circular or square glass blocks on the sidewalk in front of the building to allow Tribeca Trust light to enter the underground space below. & Downtown Heritage Some cast iron buildings display a plate or engraving on the facadewhich indicates the October 2012 name of the foundry where it was produced and the date of construction. Sponsored by: Duane Park was the first piece of land Tribeca Trust, a new neighborhood organization purchased by New York City to be used specifically as a public park. dedicated to protecting Tribeca’s historic scale, architectural character, and unique sense of place. The Cosmopolitan Hotel built in 1853 is the oldest continually operated hotel in New York For more information, contact: City. [email protected] The clock in the tower at 346 Broadway needs Downtown Heritage, an educational program to be manually wound every eight days and is devoted to developing students’ appreciation of the one of the only surviving tower clocks that has rich architectural history in downtown Manhattan not been electrified.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Preservation
    In Defense of Preservation Eric W. Allison Dorothy Minor Anthony C. Wood Jeffrey A. Kroessler, Moderator The Gotham History Festival CUNY Graduate School October 6, 2001 2 Dedicated to the memory of Dorothy M. Minor 3 Introduction This is the transcript of a panel from the first (and to date only) Gotham History Festival, held at the CUNY Graduate Center in October 2001. As a historian and longtime preservationist, I came to realize that few individuals wore both hats simultaneously. I also noticed that only rarely did conferences on local history, planning history, or urban history include discussions of historic preservation. Further, some academics were opposed to preservation in principle, linking it with such slippery concepts as gentrification, affordable housing, and cultural hegemony, even where such arguments had little connection to the realities of preservation. For those reasons I organized this panel, bringing together individuals who had extensive knowledge and experience in the field. Although thirteen years have passed, this discussion still resonates. Indeed, the arguments and examples in this discussion remain relevant, and that the preservation community continues to address many of the same issues we were confronting then. Then as now, the designation process involves more than simply evaluating sites on the merits. If that were so, then St. Savior’s Church, the 1840s country Gothic chapel by Richard Upjohn, would still be standing on its original site in Maspeth instead of dismantled and awaiting reconstruction somewhere, and 2 Columbus Circle would have had a public hearing. There are many more examples from across the five boroughs. At every step of the landmarking process, political and economic interests intrude, and along the way all sorts of irrelevant arguments against preservation – and preservationists – distract from the central question: is this site worthy of designation? What is encouraging is that preservation is no longer a bastard child of land use regulation in New York City.
    [Show full text]