DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 11 ) CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 11 ) CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 1 of 209 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-12097 (SCC) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Victoria X. Tran, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned cases. On February 9, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached here as Exhibit B: • Disclosure Statement for Debtors’ Joint Plan Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (including Debtors' Joint Plan Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as Exhibit A) (Docket No. 615) • Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Approving (A) the Adequacy of Information in the Disclosure Statement, (B) Solicitation and Voting Procedures, and (C) Certain Dates with Respect to Plan Confirmation, and (II) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 616) • Notice of Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Approving (A) the Adequacy of Information in the Disclosure Statement, (B) Solicitation and Voting Procedures, and (C) Certain Dates with Respect to Plan Confirmation, and (II) Granting Related Relief (Docket No. 617) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ___________________________ 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are Century 21 Department Stores LLC (4073), L.I. 2000, Inc. (9619), C21 Department Stores Holdings LLC (8952), Giftco 21 LLC (0347), Century 21 Fulton LLC (4536), C21 Philadelphia LLC (2106), Century 21 Department Stores of New Jersey, L.L.C. (1705), Century 21 Gardens of Jersey, LLC (9882), C21 Sawgrass Blue, LLC (8286), C21 GA Blue LLC (5776), and Century Paramus Realty LLC (5033). The Debtors’ principal place of business is: 22 Cortlandt Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10007. 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 2 of 209 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 3 of 209 Exhibit A 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 4 of 209 Exhibit A Served Via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip 1 North Park LLC c/o Goulston & Storrs PC 400 Atlantic Avenue Attn: James F. Wallack Boston MA 02110-3333 1 North Park LLC c/o Goulston & Storrs PC 885 Third Avenue 18th Floor Attn: Trevor R. Hoffmann New York NY 10022 801-Gallery C-3 MT L.P. c/o Kurtzman | Steady LLC 401 S. 2nd Street Suite 200 Attn: Jeffrey Kurtzman Philadelphia PA 19147 Berdon LLP c/o Westerman Ball Ederer et al 1201 RXR Plaza Attn: Westerman & Hennessy Uniondale NY 11556 Certain Insurers of Century 21 c/o Robins Kaplan LLP 399 Park Avenue Suite 3600 Attn: Meegan F. Hollywood New York NY 10022 Certain Insurers of Century 21 c/o Robins Kaplan LLP 800 Boylston Street Suite 2500 Attn: Matthew M. Burke Boston MA 02199 Certain Insurers of Century 21 c/o Wilmer Cutler 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Attn: Craig Goldblatt Washington DC 20006 Certain Insurers of Century 21 c/o Wilmer Cutler 60 State Street Attn: Benjamin W. Loveland Boston MA 02109 Comenity Capital Bank c/o Burr & Forman LLP 1201 N. Market Street Suite 1407 Attn: Heller & Falgowski Wilmington DE 19801 Comenity Capital Bank c/o Burr & Forman LLP 420 N. 20th Street Suite 3400 Attn: James H. Haithcock III Birmingham AL 35203 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania c/o UCTS Dept of Labor and Industry 651 Boas Street Room 925 Attn: Deb Secrest Collections Supp Harrisburg PA 17121 Daimler Trust c/o BK Servicing LLC PO BOX 131265 Attn: Ed Gezel Roseville MN 55113-0011 E. Gluck Corporation c/o Saracheck Law Firm 101 Park Avenue 27th Floor Attn: Jonathan H. Miller New York NY 10178 Excel Elevator c/o McDonald Hopkins LLC 300 North LaSalle Street Suite 1400 Attn: Nicholas M. Miller Chicago IL 60654 Gindi Family & Real Estate & Trusts c/o Klestadt Winters 200 West 41st Street 17th Floor Attn: Klestadt & Aiello New York NY 10036 Hilco Merchant & Gordon Brothers c/o Troutman Pepper 1313 Market Street Suite 5100 Attn: Douglas Herrmann & Mary Smith Wilmington DE 19899 Hilco Merchant & Gordon Brothers c/o Troutman Pepper 875 Third Avenue Attn: Brett D. Goodman New York NY 10022 Joseph DeVito c/o Jaspan Schlesinger LLP 300 Garden City Plaza 5th Floor Attn: Frank C. Dell'Amore Garden City NY 11530 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. c/o Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 300 South Grand Avenue 22nd Floor Attn: David M. Riley Los Angeles CA 90017-3132 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. c/o Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP One Federal Street 32nd Fl. Attn: Julia Frost-Davies Boston MA 02110 Lincoln Triangle Commercial Hld CO c/o Paul Hastings LLP 200 Park Avenue Attn: Harvey A. Strickon New York NY 10166 Lloyds Undrwrtrs Lndmrk Amrcn et al c/o Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale 7 World Trade Cntr 250 Greenwich St Attn: Philip D. Anker New York NY 10007 Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Attn: David Riley 2049 Century Park East Ste 700 Los Angeles CA 90067-3109 Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Attn: Julia Frost-Davies One Federal St Boston MA 02110-1716 Next Millennium Realty LLC c/o Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. One Battery Park Plaza 18th Floor Attn: Geller and Sanchez New York NY 10004 Official Comm Unsecured Creditors c/o Lowenstein Sandler LLP Jeffrey L. Cohen Lindsay H. Sklar 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10020 Official Comm Unsecured Creditors c/o Lowenstein Sandler LLP One Lowenstein Drive Attn: Brent Weisenberg Roseland NJ 07068 Oracle America Inc. c/o Buchalter Professional Corp 55 Second Street 17th Floor Attn: Shawn M. Christianson San Francisco CA 94105-3493 Parking Authority Town Morristown c/o Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis 99 Wood Avenue South Attn: David L. Bruck Iselin NJ 08830 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp c/o Office of the General Counsel 1200 K Street NW Attn: H. Uricchio & A. Walker Washington DC 20005-4026 Premier Brands Group Holdings c/o Geoffrey T. Raicht PC 1 Kittle Road Attn: Geoffrey T. Raicht Chappaqua NY 10514 Relide Realty Co LLC c/o Pollack & Sharan LLP 15 Maiden Lane Suite 1400 Attn: Adam Paul Pollack New York NY 10038 Simon Property Group Inc. Attn: Ronald M. Tucker 225 West Washington Street Indianapolis IN 46204 United Food Commr Workers Local 888 c/o Cohen Weiss and Simon LLP 900 Third Avenue Suite 2100 Attn: Joseph J. Vitale New York NY 10022-4869 US Attorney Southern Distr New York Attn: US Attorney 86 Chambers St. 3rd Floor New York NY 10022 US Trustee Southern Distr New York Attn: Andrea B Schwartz 201 Varick Street Room 1006 New York NY 10014 In re: Century 21 Department Stores LLC, et al. Case No. 20-12097 (SCC) Page 1 of 1 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 5 of 209 Exhibit B 20-12097-scc Doc 660 Filed 02/18/21 Entered 02/18/21 13:58:36 Main Document Pg 6 of 209 Exhibit B Served Via Electronic Mail Name Attention 1 Attention 2 Email 1 North Park, LLC c/o Goulston & Storrs PC Attn: James F. Wallack [email protected] 1 North Park, LLC c/o Goulston & Storrs PC Attn: Trevor R. Hoffmann [email protected] 801-Gallery C-3 MT, L.P. c/o Kurtzman | Steady, LLC Attn: Jeffrey Kurtzman [email protected] [email protected] Berdon LLP c/o Westerman Ball LLP Attn: John E. Westerman & Mickee M. Hennessy [email protected] Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s; Landmark American Insurance Co.; Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.; Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co.; and Steadfast Insurance Co. c/o Robins Kaplan LLP Attn: Matthew M. Burke [email protected] Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s; Landmark American Insurance Co.; Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.; Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co.; and Steadfast Insurance Co. c/o Robins Kaplan LLP Attn: Meegan F. Hollywood [email protected] Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s; Landmark American Insurance Co.; Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.; Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co.; and Steadfast Insurance Co. c/o Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Attn: Benjamin W. Loveland [email protected] Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s; Landmark American Insurance Co.; Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.; Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co.; and Steadfast Insurance Co. c/o Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Attn: Craig Goldblatt [email protected] Certain Underwriters Lloyd’s Subscribing; Landmark American; Liberty Mutual Fire; Starr Surplus Lines; Steadfast Insur; Endurance American Specialty; Evanston Insur; QBE Specialty Insur c/o Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale Attn: Philip D. Anker [email protected] Comenity Capital Bank c/o Burr & Forman LLP Attn: James H. Haithcock, III [email protected] [email protected] Comenity Capital Bank c/o Burr & Forman LLP Attn: Russell C. Heller & J. Cory Falgowski [email protected] Commonwealth of Pennsylvania c/o Office of UCTS, Department of Labor and Industry Attn: Deb Secrest, Collections Support Unit [email protected] Daimler Trust c/o BK Servicing, LLC Attn: Ed Gezel [email protected] E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COS Cure Notice
    20-10990-mew Doc 218 Filed 07/28/20 Entered 07/28/20 17:40:32 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 S. Jason Teele, Esq. Gregory A. Kopacz, Esq. 101 Park Avenue, 28th Floor New York, New York 10178 (212) 643-7000 (Telephone) (212) 643-6500 (Facsimile) [email protected] [email protected] Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Chapter 11 THE NORTHWEST COMPANY, LLC, et al.* Case No. 20-10990 (MEW) Debtors. (Jointly Administered) CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE Gregory A. Kopacz, of full age, certifies as follows: 1. I am not a party to the action, am over the age of eighteen, and am an associate with the firm Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession. 2. On July 24, 2020, I caused copies of the Notice of Proposed Assumption and Assignment of Certain Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (the “Notice”) to be served by Federal Express, priority overnight delivery, on the counterparties/addresses listed on Exhibit A attached hereto. Dated: July 28, 2020 New York, New York /s/ Gregory A. Kopacz Gregory A. Kopacz * The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: The Northwest Company LLC (8132) and The Northwest.com LLC (1339). The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 49 Bryant Avenue, Roslyn, New York 11576. 7390628 20-10990-mew Doc 218 Filed 07/28/20 Entered 07/28/20 17:40:32 Main Document Pg 2 of 7 Exhibit A Counterparty Name Address Marty H.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Ten Fashion Designers
    Top Ten Fashion Designers In a society where we are bombarded with fashion, how on earth do we decide who the top ten designers are? Well, after quite a lot of pondering, I came up with some names that I thought were a well-rounded group of creative minds. These are the best from all over the board. So here goes. 1. VALENTINO GARAVANI. From Italy, this man knows how to make a woman look like a goddess. Having dressed many of the world's most famous leading ladies (such as Julia Roberts and Elizabeth Taylor), he has proven his talent and risen to the top as The King of Elegance. 2. TOM FORD Born in Texas this man is not only the Creative Director for Gucci, he's also the Creative Director for Yves Saint Laurent. Ford won the Best International Designer Award in 2000. 3. DONATELLA VERSACE is one of fashions most loved divas. Born in Calabria Italy, she took over her late brother Gianni Versace's design house. By following in his footsteps Donatella has become known for her sexy yet elegant designs. 4. ALEXANDER MCQUEEN is one of the worlds most innovative and outstanding designers. Known for his theatrical influence, his creations are not only beautiful but also colourful and raw. 5. BETSEY JOHNSON. Her designs are brilliant, bold and fun. They are funky and edgy, with a lifetime of flare. Straight from the American fashion capital [New York] Betsey is known for "her celebration of the exuberant". 6. RALPH LAUREN. He could possibly be the king of ready-to wear.
    [Show full text]
  • Past CB Pitching Coaches of Year
    Collegiate Baseball The Voice Of Amateur Baseball Started In 1958 At The Request Of Our Nation’s Baseball Coaches Vol. 62, No. 1 Friday, Jan. 4, 2019 $4.00 Mike Martin Has Seen It All As A Coach Bus driver dies of heart attack Yastrzemski in the ninth for the game winner. Florida State ultimately went 51-12 during the as team bus was traveling on a 1980 season as the Seminoles won 18 of their next 7-lane highway next to ocean in 19 games after those two losses at Miami. San Francisco, plus other tales. Martin led Florida State to 50 or more wins 12 consecutive years to start his head coaching career. By LOU PAVLOVICH, JR. Entering the 2019 season, he has a 1,987-713-4 Editor/Collegiate Baseball overall record. Martin has the best winning percentage among ALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Mike Martin, the active head baseball coaches, sporting a .736 mark winningest head coach in college baseball to go along with 16 trips to the College World Series history, will cap a remarkable 40-year and 39 consecutive regional appearances. T Of the 3,981 baseball games played in FSU coaching career in 2019 at Florida St. University. He only needs 13 more victories to be the first history, Martin has been involved in 3,088 of those college coach in any sport to collect 2,000 wins. in some capacity as a player or coach. What many people don’t realize is that he started He has been on the field or in the dugout for 2,271 his head coaching career with two straight losses at of the Seminoles’ 2,887 all-time victories.
    [Show full text]
  • JMAD Media Ownership Report
    JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2014 Published: 2014 December 5 Author: Merja Myllylahti This New Zealand Ownership Report 2014 is the fourth published by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). The report finds that the New Zealand media market has failed to produce new, innovative media outlets, and that all the efforts to establish non-profit outlets have proved unsustainable. The report confirms the general findings of previous reports that New Zealand media space has remained highly commercial. It also confirms the financialisation of media ownership in the form of banks and fund managers. The report also observes that in 2014 convergence between New Zealand mass media and the communications sector generally was in full swing. Companies, such as Spark (former Telecom NZ), started to compete head-to-head with the traditional broadcasters on the online on-demand video and television markets. The American online video subscription service Netflix is entering the NZ market in March 2015. Additionally, the report notes evidence of uncomfortable alliances between citizen media, politicians, PR companies and legacy media. As Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics book revealed, the National Party and PR practitioners used the Whale Oil blog to drive their own agendas. Also, events related to Maori TV, TVNZ and Scoop raise questions about political interference in media affairs. It is now evident that the boundaries between mainstream media, bloggers, public relations practitioners and politicians are blurring. Key events and trends concerning New Zealand media Financialisation of mass media ownership confirmed Substantial changes in Fairfax, APN and MediaWorks ownership Competition heats up in online television and video markets Turbulence at Maori TV Blurred lines among politicians, bloggers, journalists and PR practitioners The JMAD New Zealand media ownership reports are available here: http://www.aut.ac.nz/study- at-aut/study-areas/communications/media-networks/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research- centre/journalists-and-projects 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SSG-2000.Pdf
    2000 Sunshine State Games Complete Results Table of Contents Archery 3 Artistic Roller Skating 7 Baseball 15 Basketball 17 Boxing 22 Canoe/Kayak 25 Fencing 28 Figure Skating 30 Golf 37 Gymnastics 38 Judo 40 Mountain Biking 43 Racquetball 45 Roller Hockey 47 Rowing 49 Slow Pitch Softball 52 Soccer—Youth 53 Speed Skating 53 Sport Twirling 56 Swimming 60 Synchronized Swimming 71 Tennis 75 Track & Field – Youth 75 Water Polo 92 Weightlifting 94 Wrestling 96 2 Archery Gator Bowman Field Range Saturday, July 8 – Sunday, June 9 28 Target Field Peewee 0-7, Cub 8-11, Youth 12-14, Young Adult 15-17, Adult 18-59, Senior 60+ Peewee Girl Freestyle Limited 1. Gemma Laudicina, Miami, 177 (Games Record) Cub Boy Barebow 1. Don Stulken, Big Pine Key, 156 Cub Boy Freestyle 1. Ryan Smith, Ocala, 496 Youth Girl Bowhunter Freestyle 1. Christine Shaw, West Palm Beach, 340 Youth Girl Freestyle 1. Charlotte McGraw, Miami, 92 (Games Record) Youth Boy Freestyle 1. Michael Mascaro, Miami, 386; 2. Michael Pettitt, Port Richey, 208 Young Adult Men Freestyle 1. Christopher Dees, Tampa, 332 Adult Women Freestyle - A Class 1. Cecelia Kimball, Winter Park, 515; 2. Shelby Rudolph, Port Charlotte, 485 Adult Women Freestyle - B Class 1. Lois Smith, Ocala, 402 Senior Women Freestyle 1. Dorothy Hageman, Leesburg, 483 (Games Record); 2. Virginia Bishop, Wauchula, 476 Adult Women Traditional 1. Rena Mascaro, Miami, 79 (Games Record); 2. Treva Laudicina, Miami, 29 Adult Men Freestyle - AA Class 1. Kevin McCloskey, Miami, 535-47x; 2. Steve Feltus, Ft Lauderdale, 535-45x; 3. Nicky Christie, Lake City, 524 Adult Men Freestyle - A Class 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Charities, Philanthropists, Policy Entrepreneurs, International Companies and State Schooling in Aotearoa New Zealand
    CHARITIES, PHILANTHROPISTS, POLICY ENTREPRENEURS, INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES AND STATE SCHOOLING IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Final report to the New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa, New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association Te Wehengarua, and New Zealand Primary Principals’ Federation Ngā Tumuaki o Aotearoa John O’Neill with Connor Duffy and Sarojinie Fernando Massey University Te Kunenga Ki Pūrehuroa, Manawatū July 2016 Contents i ii ListAcknowledgements of Tables and Figures iii Summary v Introduction 1 Context 3 Transparency, understanding and debate 4 Blurring public and private in state schooling 5 ‘Modernising’ state schooling 6 Educational Management Organisations 17 For-profit 21 Not-for-profit 25 Philanthropy 28 Regulation 29 Giving 35 Investing 36 Educational charities in New Zealand 40 Policy N 47 Actors 47 etworks 51 Cases 58 NetworksPearson 59 Cognition Education 65 Core Education 76 Foundation North 86 COMET 98 Kidscan 109 Conclusion 116 References 119 Appendices xix Appendix A: Methodology xix Appendix B: Educational charities with annual income between $1 million and $10 million xxvi Appendix C: Case organisation Tables and Figures xxxiii social network i Acknowledgements The direct costs of the research were funded jointly by New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa, New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association Te Wehengarua and New Zealand Primary Principals’ Feder Aotearoa. ation Ngā Tumuaki o Tom Haig, Liz Hawes and Stephanie Mills provided advice, guidance and feedback throughout the project. rature searches and social Connor Duffy undertook the main web and lite networktwo Charities analyses. Services Dr Sarojinie databases. Fernando undertook the statistical analysis of the Ella B ation information retrieval, Dylan Roberts withourke analysis assisted of annual with financial case organis statements, and Ju final report.
    [Show full text]
  • Objects in Tom Stoppard's Arcadia
    Cercles 22 (2012) ANIMAL, VEGETABLE OR MINERAL? OBJECTS IN TOM STOPPARD’S ARCADIA SUSAN BLATTÈS Université Stendhal—Grenoble 3 The simplicity of the single set in Arcadia1 with its rather austere furniture, bare floor and uncurtained windows has been pointed out by critics, notably in comparison with some of Stoppard’s earlier work. This relatively timeless set provides, on one level, an unchanging backdrop for the play’s multiple complexities in terms of plot, ideas and temporal structure. However we should not conclude that the set plays a secondary role in the play since the mysteries at the centre of the plot can only be solved here and with this particular group of characters. Furthermore, I would like to suggest that the on-stage objects play a similarly vital role by gradually transforming our first impressions and contributing to the multi-layered meaning of the play. In his study on the theatre from a phenomenological perspective, Bert O. States writes: “Theater is the medium, par excellence, that consumes the real in its realest forms […] Its permanent spectacle is the parade of objects and processes in transit from environment to imagery” [STATES 1985 : 40]. This paper will look at some of the parading or paraded objects in Arcadia. The objects are many and various, as can be seen in the list provided in the Samuel French acting edition (along with lists of lighting and sound effects). We will see that there are not only many different objects, but also that each object can be called upon to assume different functions at different moments, hence the rather playful question in the title of this paper (an allusion to the popular game “Twenty Questions” in which the identity of an object has to be guessed), suggesting we consider the objects as a kind of challenge to the spectator, who is set the task of identifying and interpreting them.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction It Is My Goal in This Paper to Offer a Strategy For
    Three Archetypes for the Clarification Christopher Yorke Of Utopian Theorizing University of Glasgow Introduction It is my goal in this paper to offer a strategy for translating universal statements about utopia into particular statements. This is accomplished by drawing out their implicit, temporally embedded, points of reference. Universal statements of the kind I find troublesome are those of the form ‘Utopia is x’, where ‘x’ can be anything from ‘the receding horizon’ to ‘the nation of the virtuous’. To such statements, I want to put the questions: ‘Which utopias?’; ‘In what sense?’; and ‘When was that, is that, or will that be, the case for utopias?’ Through an exploration of these lines of questioning, I arrive at three archetypes of utopian theorizing which serve to provide the answers: namely, utopian historicism, utopian presentism, and utopian futurism. The employment of these archetypes temporally grounds statements about utopia in the past, present, or future, and thus forces discussion of discrete particulars instead of abstract universals with no meaningful referents. Given the vague manner in which the term ‘utopia’ is employed in discourse—whether academic or non-academic—confusion frequently, and rightly, ensues. There are various possible sources for this confusion, the first of which is the sheer volume and wide variety of socio-political schemes that have been regarded as utopian, by utopian theorists, historians, or authors of fiction. Bibliographers of utopian literature (such as Lyman Tower Sargent) face the onerous task of sorting out those visions of other worlds that belong in the utopian canon from those that do not. However, utopian bibliographies generally err on the side of inclusiveness, and a sufficient range and number of utopias remain in the realm of discourse to make the practice of distinguishing a utopia from a non-utopia (or even a dystopia) challenging at best and baffling at worst.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(Es)
    Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(es) Location Remains UN Plaza Hotel (Park Hyatt) 1981 1 UN Plaza Manhattan N Reader's Digest 1981 28 West 23rd Street Manhattan Y NYC Dept of General Services 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Summit Hotel 1981 51 & LEX Manhattan N Schieffelin and Company 1981 2 Park Avenue Manhattan Y Ernst and Company 1981 1 Battery Park Plaza Manhattan Y Reeves Brothers, Inc. 1981 104 W 40th Street Manhattan Y Alpine Hotel 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Brooks Brothers 1982 1120 Ave of Amer. Manhattan Y Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Sanwa Bank 1982 220 Park Avenue Manhattan Y City Miday Club 1982 140 Broadway Manhattan Y Royal Business Machines 1982 Manhattan Manhattan * Billboard Publications 1982 1515 Broadway Manhattan Y U.N. Development Program 1982 1 United Nations Plaza Manhattan N Population Council 1982 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza Manhattan Y Park Lane Hotel 1983 36 Central Park South Manhattan Y U.S. Trust Company 1983 770 Broadway Manhattan Y Ford Foundation 1983 320 43rd Street Manhattan Y The Shoreham 1983 33 W 52nd Street Manhattan Y MacMillen & Co 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Solomon R Gugenheim 1983 1071 5th Avenue Manhattan * Museum American Bell (ATTIS) 1983 1 Penn Plaza, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y NYC Office of Prosecution 1983 80 Center Street, 6th Floor Manhattan Y Mc Hugh, Leonard & O'Connor 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Keene Corporation 1983 757 3rd Avenue Manhattan Y Melhado, Flynn & Assocs. 1983 530 5th Avenue Manhattan Y Argentine Consulate 1983 12 W 56th Street Manhattan Y Carol Management 1983 122 E42nd St Manhattan Y Chemical Bank 1983 277 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y Merrill Lynch 1983 55 Water Street, Floors 36 & 37 Manhattan Y WNET Channel 13 1983 356 W 58th Street Manhattan Y Hotel President (Best Western) 1983 234 W 48th Street Manhattan Y First Boston Corp 1983 5 World Trade Center Manhattan Y Ruffa & Hanover, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons in Neoliberal Survival from Rupaul's Drag Race
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 21 Issue 3 Feminist Comforts and Considerations amidst a Global Pandemic: New Writings in Feminist and Women’s Studies—Winning and Article 3 Short-listed Entries from the 2020 Feminist Studies Association’s (FSA) Annual Student Essay Competition May 2020 Postfeminist Hegemony in a Precarious World: Lessons in Neoliberal Survival from RuPaul’s Drag Race Phoebe Chetwynd Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Chetwynd, Phoebe (2020). Postfeminist Hegemony in a Precarious World: Lessons in Neoliberal Survival from RuPaul’s Drag Race. Journal of International Women's Studies, 21(3), 22-35. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol21/iss3/3 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2020 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Postfeminist Hegemony in a Precarious World: Lessons in Neoliberal Survival from RuPaul’s Drag Race By Phoebe Chetwynd1 Abstract The popularity of the reality television show RuPaul’s Drag Race is often framed as evidence of Western societies’ increasing tolerance towards queer identities. This paper instead considers the ideological cost of this mainstream success, arguing that the show does not successfully challenge dominant heteronormative values. In light of Rosalind Gill’s work on postfeminism, it will be argued that the show’s format calls upon contestants (and viewers) to conform to a postfeminist ideal that valorises normative femininity and reaffirms the gender binary.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Journal of Law and Policy Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 11 2010 Smash or Save: The ewN York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation Rebecca Birmingham Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Rebecca Birmingham, Smash or Save: The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J. L. & Pol'y (2010). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol19/iss1/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. SMASH OR SAVE: THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ACT AND NEW CHALLENGES TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION Rebecca Birmingham* “[W]e will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed. Ada Louise Huxtable, Farewell to Penn Station”1 INTRODUCTION A demolition crew lops a meticulously maintained cornice off an architecturally unique building.2 A church begs for permission to erect a soaring office tower next to a turn-of-the-century chapel.3 A pop star wields her considerable clout to finagle a dispensation to install historically inappropriate windows in her Brooklyn brownstone.4 These are just a few examples of the most recent challenges * J.D. Candidate, Brooklyn Law School, 2011; B.A., Individualized Study, New York University, 2008. Many thanks to the editorial staff at the Journal of Law and Policy for their input and suggestions.
    [Show full text]