DOCSLIB.ORG

Entomologische Litteraturblàtter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Entomologische Litteraturblàtter ENTOMOLOGISCHE LITTERATURBLÀTTER. Repertorium der neuesten Arbeiten auf dem Gesammt gebiet der Entomologie herausgegeben R. friedländer & Sohn Berlin. Neunter Jahrgang 1909. BERLIN N.W. 6, Karlstrasse 11. Totenliste der Entomologen aus dem Jahre 1909 (mit Nachträgen aus 1908). Albert C r a w (Ent. agr.). — John Adolphus Clark (Lep.) in London 16. XII. 1908. — Fritz Haverkampf (Lep.) in Elber­ feld. — Arthur von Lossberg (Ent. gen.) in Valdivia (Chile). — Fernando Paulsen (Col.) in Quillota (Chile). — A. J. v a n R o s s u m (Hyna.) in Arnhem 18. I. — Stephan Pdsztor (Ent. gen.) in Budapest 18. II. — Mark V. Slingerland (Ent. econ.) in Ithaca, N. Y., 10. III. — Gotthold Künow (Ent. gen.) in Königsberg i./Pr. 1*. III. — W. H. Edwards (Lep.) in Coalburgh, Va., 4. IV. — Van Lansberge (Col.) — Ludwig A. von Aigner (Abafi) (Lep.) in Budapest 19. VI. — Valéry Mayet (Lep., Col.) in Montpellier.— Gustav Kraatz (Col.) in Berlin 1. XI. ÏÏlufeum 9îeict)§gûue§ Oberbonou a. b. D. IHuieumftcajie 14 Register. Zeitschriften. Abeille (T. 31, 3). 232. Bulletin Soc. Hist. Nat. Mâcon (Vol. 3, 6—7). Annalen Naturh. Hofraue. (Bd. 22, 2—3). 130. 56, 98. Annales Biol. Lacustre (T. 3, 3). 115. — Soc. Lépidoptérol. Genève (Vol. 1,4). 150. — Hiet.-Nat. Mue. Hung. (Vol. 6, 2; Vol. 7,1). — Soc. Natur. Moscou (1907, 4). 79. 30, 174. — Soc. Scient. Ouest (T. 17, 2—4; T. 18, — Sc. Natur., Zool. (Sér. 9, A. 85, T. 9,1—2). 1—3) 10, 56, 157, 234. 98, 156. — Soc. Zool. France (T. 34, 1—4,7 —8). 98, — Scient. Univ. Jassy (T. 5, 3). 58. 115, 200. — Soc. Ent. Belg. (T. 52,10—13 ; T. 53,1—10). — West Ind. (Vol. 9, 4 ; Vol. 10, 1). 138, 185; 10, 35, 56, 76, 96, 116, 157, 179,198,219. — Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc. (N. S., Vol. 6, — Soc. Ent. France (Vol. 77,1 -4 ). 54,77,133. 3 - 4 ; Vol. 7, 1—2). 137, 220. Annale Carnegie Mus. (Vol. 6, 1). 38. Bullettino Soc. Ent. Ital. (A. 39, 1—4; A. 40. — Ent. Soc. America (Vol. 1,1 —4 ; Vol. 2,3). 1—2). 12, 99. 183, 236. Butlleti Inst. Catal. Hist. Nat. (II, A. 5, 8—9, — S. Afr. Mus. (Vol. 5, Pt. 6—7). 62, 164. A. 6, 5—6). 82, 201. — Transv. Mus. (Vol. 1, 4). 239. Casopis Ceské Spol. Ent. (U. 5). 213. — a. Magaz. Natur. Hist. (Ser. 8, Vol. 2,12; Centralblatt, Biol. (Bd. 28, 22—24; Bd. 29. Vol. 3, 13—18; Vol. 4, 19-23). 8, 54, 76, 1—7, 11, 18-21). 5, 29, 48, 74, 93, 128, 96, 113, 132, 177, 197, 216, 231. 212, 228. Annotationce Zool. Japon. (Vol.6, 5; Vol. 7, 2). — Forstwes. (Jg. 34, 12; Jg. 35, 4—6). 29, 83, 185. 111, 129, 149. Annuaire Mus. Zool. Acad. St.-Pétereb. (Bd. Echange, Rev. Linn. (287—298). 10, 34, 55, 13, 3; Beilage; Bd. 13, 4; Bd. 14, 1—2). 80, 98, 134, 156, 178, 198, 233. 12, 135, 182. Entomologist (547—558). 6, 31, 52, 74, 94, Anzeiger Akad. Krakau (1908, 9). 73. 112, 131, 152, 175, 196, 214, 230. — Zool. (Bd. 33, 19—26; Bd. 34, 1, 3—4, — Canadian (Vol. 40,11 -1 2 ; Vol. 41,1-10), 6 -8 ,1 1 —21, 24—26; Bd. 35, 4 -5). 4, 29, 14, 38, 60, 82, 101,118,138,162,184, 201, 48, 73, 93, l i t , 128, 147, 173, 196, 212. 220, 238. Archiv Biontol. (Rd. 2, 2). 194. Entomologieta Brasil. (A. 2, 1—9). 61, 83, —• Naturgesch. (Jg. 76, Bd. 1,1—2). 128,194. 103, 162, 202, 238. — Protistenk. (Bd. 14,1 ; Bd. 15, 3). 48, 148. Entomologist’s Monthly Magas. (228—239). Archives Paraeitol. (T. 12, 2—3; T. 13, 3). 7, 31, 63, 75, 95, 112, 131, 153, 176, 197, 10, 79, 218. 215, 230. — Zool. (Sér. 5, T. 1, 6—7 ; T. 2, 1 ; Not. — Record (Vol. 20, 11—12; Vol. 21, 1—10). et Rev., Vol. 42, 1 ; T. 2, 4—5). 179, 199, 7, 32,53, 75, 95, 113,132,153,176, 215, 231. 200, 217. Feuille d. Jeunes Naturalistes (458—465, 468 Archivum Zool. (Vol. 1, 1). 229. - 469). 9,34,56, 80,99,115,134,156,218,233. Bericht Senckenb. Ges. Frankf. a. M. (40). 194. Frelon (A. 16, 9—12; A. 17, 1 -5 ). 78, 114, — Stat. PQ.-Schutz Hamb. (10). 194. 155, 199, 217, 232. Biologien (Vol. 2, Fase. 4). 234. Horae Soc. Ent. Ross. (T. 38, 4). 11. Blätter, Ent. (Jg. 4, 11—12; Jg. 5, 1 -9 ). 4, Jahrbücher Nass. Ver. Naturk. (Jg. 61—62). 28, 70, 128, 146, 172, 193, 211. 5, 228. Boletin Soc. Aragon. Cienc. Nat. (T. 7,8—10; — Zool. (Abt. Anat.) (Bd. 27, 3 -4). 148, 172. T. 8, 5). 58, 135. (Abt. Syst.) (Bd. 27, 3, 6; Bd. 28, 2). — Soc. Eepan. Hist. Nat. (T. 8, 8; T. 9, 3—6). 74, 172, 228. 13, 135, 181. -------(Suppl.) (XI, 1). 111. Bollettino Lab. Zool. Fortici (Vol. 3). 180. Jahresbericht Wien. Ent. Ver. (1908). 173. — Teen. Tabacchi (A. 7,3—4 ; A. 8,1). 13,116. Journal, Agricult., Cape (Vol. 33, 4, 5 ; Vol. 31, Broteria (Vol. 8, 1 -3 ). 100, 158, 234. 4). 39, 84, 139. Bulletin Acad. St.-Pétersb. (1908, 12—13). 36. ------ India (Vol. 4, 3). 204. — Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Vol. 24). 59. — Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. (Vol. 18, 4; Vol. — Biol. (Vol. 15, 6; Vol. 16, 1, 5; Vol. 17, 2). 19, 1). 61, 163. 37, 60, 137, 184. — comp. Neurol. (Vol. 18, 5). 38. — Science, Univ. Kansas (Vol. 4, 7—20). 103. — Cooper Research Laborat. (V ol.1,1). 414. — Soc. Ent. Égypte (1908, 4; 1909, 1—2). — econom. Biol. (Vol. 3, No. 4; Vol. 4, 163, 239. No. 1 -3 ). 33, 133, 177, 216. -------France (1908, 15—20; 1909, 1—14). — econom. Ent. (Vol. 1, 6; Vol. 2, 1—5). 9, 33, 54, 77, 96, 114, 154, 216. 37, 82, 116, 161, 201, 237. IV Journal eiperim. Zoöl. (Vol. 6,1,4; Vol. 7.2). Revue Russe Ent. (T. 7, 4; T. 8, 1—4; T. 9, 60, 184, 237. 1—2). 11, 36, 67, 159, 234. — Microac. Soc. (1608, 4). 8. — Scient. Bourb. (1909, 1—3). 99,157, 218. — Morphol. (Vol. 1», 2 ; Vol. 20, 1—2). 14, Riviata Coleotterol. Ital. (A. 6, 8—12; A. 7, 137, 202. i ) > 1—7). 13, 35, 57, 100, 116, 136, 158, 180. — New York Ent. Soc. (Vol. 16,4; Vol. 17. Rovartani Lapok (Bd. 15, 7—10; Bd. 16, 1 -3 ). 59, 102, 159, 236. 1 -8 ). 50, 81, 100, 180, 175, 229. — Pomona, Ent. (Vol. 1, 1). 117. Rundschau, Ent. (Jg. 26, 1—21). 28, 45, 71, — Paychol. u. Neurol. (Bd. 13). 29. 92, 110, 126, 146, 170, 191, 211, 227. Marcellia (Vol. 7, 4—6; Vol. 8, 1—3). 13. Sitxungeberichte Gea. naturf. Freunde Berl. 57, 158, 180. (1908, 8—9; 1909, 1—3, 5—7). 5, 47, 93, Meddelelaer, Ent. (R. II, Bd. 3, H. 4; Bd. 4, 129, 195, 212, 228. H. 1). 100, 151. Societaa Ent. (Jg. 23, 16—24; Jg. 24, 1—15). — Grönland (H. 29, 2). 151. 6, 31, 50, 71, 93, 112, 131, 150, 175, 193, — Naturh. Foren. KJöbenh. (1908). 151. 214, 229. HAmoirea Soc. Ent. Belg. (15—16). 78. Spolia Zeyl. (Vol. 6, 21). 138. Égypte (Vol. 1, 1). 119. Tidakrift, Ent. (Ag. 29, 1—4). 51. — Soc. Zool. France (T. 22, 1—2). 200. Tijdechrift Ent. (Dl. 51, 2—4; Dl. 52, 1—2). Memoriaa Inat. O. Crua (T. 1, 1). 220. 6, 51, 150. Miacellanea Ent. (Vol. 16, 1—12; Vol. 17, Traneactiona Amer. Ent. Soc. (Vol. 34, 4; 1 -6). 34, 55, 78, 97, 133,155,178,199, 233. Vol. 35, 1). 58, 219. Mitteilungen Naturw. Ver. Steierm. (Bd. 45, — Ent. Soc. London (1908, 3—4; 1909, 2). 195. 1—3). 52, 162, 210. — Polyxena (Jg. 3, 7—12; Jg. 4, 1—6). 5, Verhandlungen Naturf. Ver. Brünn (Bd. 46). 50. 49, 70, 92, 112,130, 149, 174, 193, 213, 229. — Naturb.Ver. Preuaa. Rheinlands (1908). 195. — Schweia. Ent. Gee. (Vol. 11, 9). 149. — Zool.-Bot. Gee. Wien (Bd. 58, 8—10; Bd. Monitore Zool. Ital. (A. 20, 4, 6). 158, 181. 59, 1—6). 49, 74, 94, 149, 195. Naturaliet, Amer. (504, 609 —510). 37, 137, Wochenblatt, Ent. (Jg. 25, 47—62). 2, 27. 161. Zeitachrift Ausbau Entwicklungslehre (Bd. 3, — Ohio (Vol. 9, 3—5, 8). 83, 117, 162. — Victor. (Vol. 25, 7; Vol. 26, 4). 39, 204. — HEnt! (Jg. 22, 32-52; Jg. 23, 1—31). 8, 26, Naturaliate (521-543). 9, 34, 55, 80, 99, 115, 46, 71, 91, 110, 127, 146, 171, 191, 210, 226. 134, 156, 179, 200, 218, 233. — Berl. Ent. (Bd. 53, 2—4; Bd. 54, 1—2). Newa, Ent. (Vol. 19, 9—10; Vol. 20, 1—8). 25 89 189. 14, 59, 101, 136, 160, 182, 237. — Dt. Ent. (1908, 6; 1909, 1—6; Beih.). 1, Notea Leyd. Mue. (Vol. 30, 2 -3 ). 52. 26, 69, 90, 126, 169, 190, 225. NovitateeZool. (Vol. 15, 2; Vol. 16,1). 8,164. -------Iris (Bd. 21, 3 - 4 ; Bd. 22, 1—3; Bd. Paraeitology (Vol. 2, 1—2). 178. 23, Beih. 1). 109, 209. Proceedinga Ent. Soo. Waahington (Vol. 10, — Jen., Naturwiea. (Bd. 45, 1). 148. 3—4; Vol. 11, 1—3). 160,*) 183, 202, 236. — Ineektenbiol. (Bd. 4, 8 —12; Bd. 5, 1—9). — Hawaiian Ent. Soc. (Vol. 2, 1—2). 16,238. 2, 47, 72, 145, 170, 191, 211, 226. — Linn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Dissection of Azuki Bean Weevil (Callosobruchus Chinensis L.) Resistance in Moth Bean (Vigna Aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal)
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Genetic Dissection of Azuki Bean Weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) Resistance in Moth Bean (Vigna aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal) Prakit Somta 1,2,3,* , Achara Jomsangawong 4, Chutintorn Yundaeng 1, Xingxing Yuan 1, Jingbin Chen 1 , Norihiko Tomooka 5 and Xin Chen 1,* 1 Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing 210014, China; [email protected] (C.Y.); [email protected] (X.Y.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand 3 Center for Agricultural Biotechnology (AG-BIO/PEDRO-CHE), Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand 4 Program in Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; [email protected] 5 Genetic Resources Center, Gene Bank, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (X.C.) Received: 3 September 2018; Accepted: 12 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: The azuki bean weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) is an insect pest responsible for serious postharvest seed loss in leguminous crops. In this study, we performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping of seed resistance to C. chinensis in moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal). An F2 population of 188 plants developed by crossing resistant accession ‘TN67’ (wild type from India; male parent) and susceptible accession ‘IPCMO056’ (cultivated type from India; female parent) was used for mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Nghiên Cứu Thành Phần Mọt Hại Ngô Sau
    VIỆN HÀN LÂM KHOA HỌC BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ VIỆT NAM HỌC VIỆN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ ----------------------------- NGUYỄN VĂN DƯƠNG NGHIÊN CỨU THÀNH PHẦN MỌT HẠI NGÔ SAU THU HOẠCH VÀ ẢNH HƯỞNG CỦA MỘT SỐ YẾU TỐ SINH THÁI ĐẾN SỰ PHÁT TRIỂN CỦA LOÀI MỌT Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky TRONG KHO BẢO QUẢN Ở SƠN LA LUẬN ÁN TIẾN SĨ SINH HỌC Hà Nội – 2021 VIỆN HÀN LÂM KHOA HỌC BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ VIỆT NAM HỌC VIỆN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ ----------------------------- NGUYỄN VĂN DƯƠNG NGHIÊN CỨU THÀNH PHẦN MỌT HẠI NGÔ SAU THU HOẠCH VÀ ẢNH HƯỞNG CỦA MỘT SỐ YẾU TỐ SINH THÁI ĐẾN SỰ PHÁT TRIỂN CỦA LOÀI MỌT Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky TRONG KHO BẢO QUẢN Ở SƠN LA Chuyên ngành: Sinh thái học Mã số: 9 42 01 20 Người hướng dẫn khoa học: 1. PGS.TS. Khuất Đăng Long 2. PGS.TS. Lê Xuân Quế Hà Nội – 2021 LỜI CAM ĐOAN Để đảm bảo tính trung thực của luận án, tôi xin cam đoan: Luận án “Nghiên cứu thành phần mọt hại ngô sau thu hoạch và ảnh hưởng của một số yếu tố sinh thái đến sự phát triển loài mọt Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky trong kho bảo quản ở Sơn La”. Là công trình nghiên cứu của cá nhân tôi, dưới sự hướng dẫn khoa học của PGS.TS. Khuất Đăng Long và PGS.TS. Lê Xuân Quế, các tài liệu tham khảo đều được trích nguồn. Các kết quả trình bày trong luận án là trung thực và chưa từng được công bố ở bất kì công trình nào trước đây./.
    [Show full text]
  • Callosobruchus Spp.) in Vigna Crops: a Review
    NU Science Journal 2007; 4(1): 01 - 17 Genetics and Breeding of Resistance to Bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.) in Vigna Crops: A Review Peerasak Srinives1*, Prakit Somta1 and Chanida Somta2 1Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Parham, 73140 Thailand 2Asian Regional Center, AVRDC-The World Vegetable Center, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, 73140 Thailand *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Vigna crops include mungbean (V. radiata), blackgram (V. mungo), azuki bean (V. angularis) and cowpea (V. unguiculata) are agriculturally and economically important crops in tropical and subtropical Asia and/or Africa. Bruchid beetles, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and C. maculatus (F.) are the most serious insect pests of Vigna crops during storage. Use of resistant cultivars is the best way to manage the bruchids. Bruchid resistant cowpea and mungbean have been developed and comercially used, each with single resistance source. However, considering that enough time and evolutionary pressure may lead bruchids to overcome the resistance, new resistance sources are neccessary. Genetics and mechanism of the resistance should be clarified and understood to develop multiple resistance cultivars. Gene technology may be a choice to develop bruchid resistance in Vigna. In this paper we review sources, mechanism, genetics and breeding of resistance to C. chinensis and C. maculatus in Vigna crops with the emphasis on mungbean, blackgram, azuki bean and cowpea. Keywords: Bruchid resistance, Callosobruchus spp., Legumes, Vigna spp. INTRODUCTION The genus Vigna falls within the tribe Phaseoleae and family Fabaceae. Species in this taxon mainly distribute in pan-tropical Asia and Africa. Seven Vigna species are widely cultivated and known as food legume crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Use of Varieties of Beans Resistant to Certain Insect Pests of Legumes
    THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF VARIETIES OF BEANS RESISTANT TO CERTAIN INSECT PESTS OF LEGUMES, DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By JOSE CALDERON GUEVARA, Ing. Agr., M. Sc. The Ohio State University. 1957 Approved by: CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...................... 1 REVIEW OE LITERATURE ............................. 4 Insect Outbreaks .................... 4 Food Plant Selection by Insects ................ 11 The Mechanisms of Resistance .................. 14 Cause of Resistance ........................... 18 Factors that Affect the Expression or the Permanence of Resistance .................. 22 SYNOPSIS OF THE BIOLOGY OF THE APION POD WEEVIL .... 29 SELECTION OF VARIETIES RESISTANT TO THE APION POD WEEVIL, APION GODMANI WAG................... 30 Seasonal infestation of A. godmani Wagner in Susceptible Varieties .............. 31 Investigation of the Cause of Resistance on beans to Apion godmani Wagner ........... 37 Crossing Program for A. godmani Resistance ....... 42 Classification of Bean Varieties and Lines ac­ cording to Resistance to the ApionPod Weevil .. 49 NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY OF THE SEED CORN MAGGOT IN MEXICO .... 52 Experiments on Seed Color Preference of Hylemya cilicrura .................................. 59 Preliminary Selection of Resistant Varieties to the Seed Corn Maggot ........... 61, ii PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS ON THE SELECTION. OF BEAN VARIETIES RESISTANT TO THE POTATO LEAFHOPPER .... 64 Experiments at the University Farm, Columbus,Ohio. 67 Experimental Designs ........................... 67 Relationship Between the Potato Leafhopper and Bean Plants ................................. 68 Leafhopper Damage .................... ......... 69 Recuperation of the Bean Plant from Insect Attack and Seasonal Differences .............. 72 Effect of Weather on the Potato Leafhopper and the Bean Plant .............................. 76 Tolerance of Different Bean Varieties to the Potato Leafhopper .....
    [Show full text]
  • General-Poster
    XXIV International Congress of Entomology General-Poster > 157 Section 1 Taxonomy August 20-22 (Mon-Wed) Presentation Title Code No. Authors_Presenting author PS1M001 Madagascar’s millipede assassin bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Ectrichodiinae): Taxonomy, phylogenetics and sexual dimorphism Michael Forthman, Christiane Weirauch PS1M002 Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Papilio memnon complex suggests multiple origins of mimetic colour pattern and sexual dimorphism Chia-Hsuan Wei, Matheiu Joron, Shen-HornYen PS1M003 The evolution of host utilization and shelter building behavior in the genus Parapoynx (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Acentropinae) Ling-Ying Tsai, Chia-Hsuan Wei, Shen-Horn Yen PS1M004 Phylogenetic analysis of the spider mite family Tetranychidae Tomoko Matsuda, Norihide Hinomoto, Maiko Morishita, Yasuki Kitashima, Tetsuo Gotoh PS1M005 A pteromalid (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) parasitizing larvae of Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and the fi rst fi nding of the facial pit in Chalcidoidea Kazunori Matsuo, Junichiro Abe, Kanako Atomura, Junichi Yukawa PS1M006 Population genetics of common Palearctic solitary bee Anthophora plumipes (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) in whole species areal and result of its recent introduction in the USA Katerina Cerna, Pavel Munclinger, Jakub Straka PS1M007 Multiple nuclear and mitochondrial DNA analyses support a cryptic species complex of the global invasive pest, - Poster General Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Chia-Hung Hsieh, Hurng-Yi Wang, Cheng-Han Chung,
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta Diptera) in Freshwater (Excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel
    Entomology Publications Entomology 2008 Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel Miroslav Barták Czech University of Agriculture Art Borkent Salmon Arm Gregory W. Courtney Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs BoudewPart ofijn the GoBddeeiodivrisersity Commons, Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the TRoyerarle Bestrlgiialan a Indnstit Aquaute of Nticat uErcaol Scienlogyce Cs ommons TheSee nex tompc page forle addte bitioniblaiol agruthorapshic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ent_pubs/41. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Entomology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Abstract Today’s knowledge of worldwide species diversity of 19 families of aquatic Diptera in Continental Waters is presented. Nevertheless, we have to face for certain in most groups a restricted knowledge about distribution, ecology and systematic,
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) Collected in Southern Spain
    Entomologiske M eddelelser 37 (1969) 97 Some Lonchopteridae and Chamaemyiidae (Diptera) collected in Southern Spain. With an appendix. By Kenneth G. V. Smith British Museum (Natural History), Loudon. The family Lonchopteridae has only one genus, Lonchoptera Meigen, which is represented in the Palaearctic region by 14 spe­ cies. The species are very variable in colour and numerous varie­ ties have been described and named, but these are ignored in the present paper since they have no true taxonomic status. Three species have been recorded from Spain (Strobl1899, 1906; Czerny and Strobl, 1909). Two of these are present in the material report­ ed upon. The family Chamaemyiidae is represented in the Palaearctic region by 9 genera and subgenera containing some 72 described species. There was much confusion in the determination of species until modern workers, notably Tanasijtshuk in the U.S.S.R., began biological studies coupled with detailed descriptions and illustra­ tions of the male genitalia. In the present author's opinion the genus Leucopis in particular should be regarded by Dipterists in the same way that Hymenopterists regard many Chalcidoidea, and descriptions or even determinations of some groups of species should be avoided unless reared series are available for study. The immature stages should be sought among colonies of Hemip­ tera-Homoptera of the families Aphididae, Adelgidae and Coccidae upon which the larvae are predaceous. Eleven species have previously been recorded from Spain of which 6 are present in the collections reported upon. The recorded species not present are Chamaemyia flavipalpis Haliday (= ma­ ritima Zetterstedt) and C. geniculata Zetterstedt (Strobl, 1900); Leucopis grise.ola Fallen, L.
    [Show full text]
  • EC) No 338/97 on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade Therein
    12.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 212/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 709/2010 of 22 July 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (7) The species Ctenosaura bakeri, C. oedirhina, C. melanosterna, C. palearis, Agalychnis spp., Dynastes satanas, Operculicarya hyphaenoides, O. pachypus, Zygosicyos pubescens, Z. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European tripartitus, Aniba rosaeodora (with annotation), Adenia Union, olaboensis, Cyphostemma elephantopus, C. montagnacii and Bulnesia sarmientoi (with annotation) have been included in Appendix II. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna 1 and flora by regulating trade therein ( ), and in particular (8) The Appendix II listing of Beccariophoenix madagascariensis Article 19(5) thereof, and Neodypsis decaryi was extended to include seeds from Madagascar. Whereas: (9) The following species have been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention at the request of Malaysia: Arbo­ (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species rophila campbelli, Arborophila charltonii, Caloperdix oculeus, in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Lophura erythrophthalma, Lophura ignita, Melanoperdix niger, Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices Polyplectron inopinatum, Rhizothera dulitensis, Rhizothera to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered longirostris and Rollulus rouloul, and the species Haliotis Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the midae has been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention’.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the Separation of Dynastini and Oryctini
    Chromosome analyses challenge the taxonomic position of Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the separation of Dynastini and Oryctini Anne-Marie DUTRILLAUX Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7205-OSEB, case postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Zissis MAMURIS University of Thessaly, Laboratory of Genetics, Comparative and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 41221 Larissa (Greece) Bernard DUTRILLAUX Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7205-OSEB, case postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Dutrillaux A.-M., Mamuris Z. & Dutrillaux B. 2013. — Chromosome analyses challenge the taxonomic position of Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the separation of Dynastini and Oryctini. Zoosystema 35 (4): 537-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2013n4a7 ABSTRACT Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Melolonthidae: Dynastinae), one of the largest Scarabaeoid beetles of the Ethiopian Region, is classified in the tribe Dynastini MacLeay, 1819, principally on the basis of morphological characters of the male: large frontal and pronotal horns, and enlargement of fore legs. With the exception of A. centaurus, the 62 species of this tribe belong to ten genera grouped in Oriental plus Australasian and Neotropical regions. We performed cytogenetic studies of A. centaurus and several Asian and Neotropical species of Dynastini, in addition to species belonging to other sub-families of Melolonthidae Leach, 1819 and various tribes of Dynastinae MacLeay, 1819: Oryctini Mulsant, 1842, Phileurini Burmeister, 1842, Pentodontini Mulsant, 1842 and Cyclocephalini Laporte de Castelnau, 1840. The karyotypes of most species were fairly alike, composed of 20 chromosomes, including 18 meta- or sub-metacentric autosomes, one acrocentric or sub-metacentric X-chromosome, and one punctiform Y-chromosome, as that of their presumed common ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta, Diptera) 213 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.441.7197 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441:Checklist 213–223 (2014) of the families Lonchopteridae and Phoridae of Finland (Insecta, Diptera) 213 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7197 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the families Lonchopteridae and Phoridae of Finland (Insecta, Diptera) Jere Kahanpää1 1 Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Jere Kahanpää ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Salmela | Received 5 February 2014 | Accepted 26 March 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/0C0D4F58-4F6C-488B-B3F0-ECFDF449FEF1 Citation: Kahanpää J (2014) Checklist of the families Lonchopteridae and Phoridae of Finland (Insecta, Diptera). In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 213–223. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7197 Abstract A checklist of the Lonchopteridae and Phoridae recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, Lonchopteridae, Phoridae Introduction The superfamily Phoroidea includes at least the fly families Phoridae, Lonchopteridae, and the small family Ironomyiidae known only from Australia. The flat-footed fly families Platypezidae and Opetiidae, treated in a separate paper in this volume, are placed either in their own basal superfamily Platypezoidea or included in Phoroidea (see Cumming et al. 1995, Woodley et al. 2009 and Wiegmann et al. 2011). Lonchoptera Meigen, 1803 is the only currently recognized genus in Lonchopteri- dae. Five Lonchoptera species have been added to the Finnish fauna after the checklist of Hackman (1980) (Andersson 1991, Kahanpää 2013). The scuttle flies (family Phoridae) may be the largest single family in Diptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryo Polarity in Moth Flies and Mosquitoes Relies on Distinct Old
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Embryo polarity in moth flies and mosquitoes relies on distinct old genes with localized transcript isoforms Yoseop Yoon1, Jeff Klomp1†, Ines Martin-Martin2, Frank Criscione2, Eric Calvo2, Jose Ribeiro2, Urs Schmidt-Ott1* 1Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States; 2Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, United States Abstract Unrelated genes establish head-to-tail polarity in embryos of different fly species, raising the question of how they evolve this function. We show that in moth flies (Clogmia, Lutzomyia), a maternal transcript isoform of odd-paired (Zic) is localized in the anterior egg and adopted the role of anterior determinant without essential protein change. Additionally, Clogmia lost maternal germ plasm, which contributes to embryo polarity in fruit flies (Drosophila). In culicine (Culex, Aedes) and anopheline mosquitoes (Anopheles), embryo polarity rests on a previously unnamed zinc finger gene (cucoid), or pangolin (dTcf), respectively. These genes also localize an alternative transcript isoform at the anterior egg pole. Basal-branching crane flies (Nephrotoma) also enrich maternal pangolin transcript at the anterior egg pole, suggesting that pangolin functioned as ancestral axis determinant in flies. In conclusion, flies evolved an unexpected diversity of anterior determinants, and alternative transcript isoforms with distinct expression can adopt fundamentally distinct developmental roles. *For correspondence: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46711.001 Present address: †University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Introduction Chapel Hill, United States The specification of the primary axis (head-to-tail) in embryos of flies (Diptera) offers important Competing interests: The advantages for studying how new essential gene functions evolve in early development.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosearch 2004 Report
    Biosearch Nyika: Malawi 2004 Edited by Marianne J Overton FOREWORD Peter Overton It is ten years since the Biosearch Nyika project was first mooted and agreement with the Director of National Parks and Wildlife obtained for our exploration of the remoter parts of the Nyika National Park. Over this period the teams have focused mainly on the northern part of the park where patrolling has been very limited and our gathering of intelligence has been most helpful to the Nyika management. In 2004 we undertook the most challenging expedition to date, launched from the extreme north of the park at Uledi, a four-hour drive from Thazima. The team‟s first challenge was to cross the unbridged North Rukuru River with all their supplies. They then had to climb up the western escarpment of the Mpanda ridge to a point on the Mpero River, where they set up a Base Camp, from which to launch out on their surveys. The greatest achievement was to climb both Mpanda and Kawozya and discover the remote Bleak House, now derelict but offering stunning views over Lake Malawi and far beyond. At this point they could certainly claim to be in remote country since this old site is much talked about but very rarely seen by visitors. We have yet to have clear information about who built it, when and why. Perhaps it was a holiday „retreat‟ for Livingstonia or a staging post for missionaries who conducted business on the west of the Nyika National Park and into Zambia. In many ways this expedition was the pinnacle of logistical achievement.
    [Show full text]