Scientific Academies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scientific Academies View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AIR Universita degli studi di Milano S Scientific Academies process that science underwent in order to be autonomous from an organic and homogeneous Giulia Giannini view of knowledge, a view that was exactly the Max-Planck-Institut fur€ Wissenschaftsgeschichte hallmark of that model in which the academies (Berlin), Berlin, Germany were born. Abstract The expression “scientific academies” tradition- The first Renaissance academies developed ally refers to those state-supported learned socie- around the middle of the fifteenth century and ties that, from the second half of the seventeenth had a primarily encyclopedic character. The century, carried out collective, experimental main trait of the knowledge cultivated in their research and were regulated by a system of first phase was the revival of the classical culture. norms or by a formal charter. The emergence of On the one hand they, fostered a renewed interest academies such as the Royal Society in London especially in Platonic philosophy, and on the (1660), the Acade´mie Royale des Sciences in other hand they cultivated the dream of a some- Paris (1666), or the Kurfurstlich€ what all-embracing knowledge. Brandenburgische Societa¨t der Wissenschaften Vernacular literature, liberal arts, music, in Berlin (1700) is closely connected with a pro- mathematics, and the study of nature were all gressive specialization of the different types of parts, within the fifteenth to sixteenth-century learning that was largely foreign to the Renais- academies, of a wider landscape of interests. sance conceptions of knowledge. And yet, it is It is exactly this tension and strife towards a precisely during the Renaissance that the Acad- unifying and organic picture of knowledge that emy model developed and spread. threatens any attempt at formulating a classifica- Starting especially with the groups that origi- tion of themes and contents that were addresses nated c. 1440 around renowned humanists such as by the first renaissance academies. Ottaviano Rinuccini and Marsilio Ficino The question of the scientific academy in the (▶ Ficino, Marsilio) in Florence or Pomponio Renaissance should thus be posed and defined Leto and Cardinal Bessarione (▶ Bessarion, considering on the one hand the relation with Basil Cardinal) in Rome, hundreds of various the wider academic phenomenology and on the types of academies flourished and thrived other hand with the birth and rise of the “new throughout the Renaissance (▶ Academies). science,” in particular when it comes to the very Many such learned societies entertained close # Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 M. Sgarbi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_79-1 2 Scientific Academies connections with the courts, with their dynamics, entertain an organic relationship with more clas- and with the unstable political and dynastic lives sical forms of learning. Only from the of the signorie; and all of them depended on the mid-sixteenth century do academies begin to initiative and the patronage of a prince or an focus on specific disciplines and thus evolve aristocrat to survive. For this reason, academies into increasingly more formalized and structured were not only numerous, but also quite ephem- institutions. This process began with literary eral, often lacking a structure and a defined academies and later developed among scientific program. institutions – not only were the latter significantly An almost exclusively Italian phenomenon, fewer than the former but at least until the end of Renaissance academies are de facto a product of the seventeenth century they often lacked an humanistic culture, of aristocratic patronage, and organized structure and a program. of the polycentric cultural life of the time in Italy. The academies devoted to figurative arts and The first scientific academies were born in this drawing are in this respect an exception. Besides context and represent, at least at the beginning, a being considered among the most specialized variation on the humanistic academies of the scientific academies, they were also some of the Renaissance. most regulated and institutionalized ones. The In his monumental Storia delle accademie year 1563 marked the foundation of the d’Italia (5 vol., Bologna, 1926–1930), Michele Accademia delle Arti del Disegno in Florence, Maylender identifies the Accademia dei Fenici, under the influence of Giorgio Vasari (▶ Vasari, founded in Milan around 1550, as the first “sci- Giorgio). The academy’s main purpose was to entific” academy. The activities carried out by foster collaboration between artists, and from this academy are documented, according to 1569 it also officially included mathematics, Maylender, in Book I of Bartolomeno Taegio’ Il anatomy, and perspective among its fields of Liceo (Milan, 1571), which discusses “the order study. of the Academies and the Nobility.” The ency- The belief that mathematical sciences played a clopedic program described by Taegio is struc- fundamental role in the new political and military tured around ten monthly meetings or organization of the state brought Cosimo I to congregations, each devoted to a different subject create one of the first academies endowed with a and entirely carried out in the vernacular: dialec- legal status and financed by the state. Like the tic, rhetoric, poetry, natural philosophy, meta- Acade´mie Royale de Peinture et de physics, arithmetic, moral philosophy, Sculpture – founded in France in 1648 and household and state government, and reading of reorganized by Louis XIV in 1661 – the Floren- academic works. Although it is difficult to deter- tine academy of drawing had a formal charter, mine whether Taegio is actually referring to the was directly supported by the king and, more Accademia dei Fenici, the program of activities importantly, included teaching among its activi- described in Il Liceo appears to provide a faithful ties, something that academies both in the picture of the relationships between science and Renaissance and in modern times did not nor- the academies around the mid-sixteenth century. mally offer. Signs of interests that nowadays would be On the other hand, information regarding the defined as scientific are also found in other academies devoted to the study of nature is very “mixed” academies of the time, such as the scarce at least until the Lincean experience. Accademia degli Infiammati in Padua In the proem to his Secreti nuovi di (1540–1550), the Accademia Fiorentina maravigliosa virtu` (Venice 1567), Girolamo (Florence, 1541), the Accademia degli Affidati Ruscelli (c. 1518–1566) describes an academy in Pavia (1562), or the Accademia degli Unanimi “kept and called secreta” that he helped to estab- in Salo` (1564). Among their activities are topics lish in Naples. With the exception of his state- connected with arithmetic, cosmography, geom- ments, there is no evidence that the Accademia etry, or philosophy of nature, which in turn Segreta ever existed but it was probably founded Scientific Academies 3 in the early 1640s when Ruscelli moved to mechanics. Not unlike many other Renaissance Naples. According to Ruscelli, the aim of the academies, the Linceans had an emblem (the academy was “to make the most diligent inquiries lynx) and a motto (Sagacius ista). A set of rules and, as it were, a true anatomy of the things and similar to those found in religious or chivalric operations of Nature itself.” Even though the orders defined the selection criteria for new appli- activity of Ruscelli’s group was meant to be cants as well as the ideals and lifestyle to which kept secret, the members devoted themselves the members would have to conform. “equally to the benefit of the world in general The Lynceographum (2001), which Cesi and in particular, by reducing to certainty and began in 1605, regulated every aspect of the true knowledge so many most useful and impor- Linceans’ life and called for a radical reform of tant secrets of all kinds for all sorts of people, be learning and customs. The academy was initially they rich or poor, learned or ignorant, male or designed as a sort of lay confraternity in which female, young or old.” The Secreti nuovi contains scientific activity was driven by religious enthu- 1,245 recipes that Ruscelli claims were only a siasm. Every work published by one of its mem- fraction of the “experiments” carried out within bers had to display the title “Lincean” next to the the academy. Most of them dealt with medicine, name of the author; moreover, members were the others ranged from alchemical processes and forbidden to belong to any religious order and to cosmetics to various technical recipes. discuss matters connected with politics or reli- A similar academy, the Academia Secretorium gion. Cesi put forward a model of knowledge in Naturae, was founded by Giambattista della which a disinterested form of knowledge Porta (▶ della Porta, Giambattista) at his home contrasted with the “bookish” learning of the in Naples in the 1650s. As William Eamon schools as well as with courtly worldliness. In pointed out, “the nearly identical names of the his project, explained in the Discorso del natural two academies, their proximity in time and place, desiderio di sapere (1616), the study of nature is and the similarity of their experimental method- articulated into observation and experimentation. ologies, was surely no coincidence.” Della Porta However, this emphasis on the value of direct only mentioned the academy in the preface to the observation of nature and of experimental prac- second edition of his Magia Naturalis (1589), tice, which became even stronger in 1611 when which largely consists of a vast collection of Galileo joined the academy, was often relegated recipes and experiments ranging from medicine to a theoretical level rather than being adopted as to optics, from crafts to distillation. At least two a real research model. The academy was in fact artisans, the distiller Giambattista Melfi and the more an ideal community of scholars than a place herbalist Flavio Giordano, were involved in the for regular meetings.
Recommended publications
  • Il Microscopio Di Galileo Antologia
    Il microscopio di Galileo Antologia Qui di seguito sono stati raccolti alcuni brani antologici relativi al microscopio di Galileo e alla microscopia del Seicento a cura dell’ Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze. 1 Indice John Wedderburn: una preziosa testimonianza sul microscopio di Galileo (1610).............................3 Galileo Galilei: "un Telescopio accomodato per veder gli oggetti vicinissimi" (1623) ......................4 Giovanni Faber: Galileo "è un altro Creatore" (1624).........................................................................5 Galileo Galilei: descrizione del microscopio (1624) ...........................................................................6 Giovanni Faber: il nome “microscopio” (1625) ..................................................................................7 Vincenzo Viviani: Galileo inventore del microscopio (1654).............................................................8 Accademia del Cimento: un’osservazione al microscopio (1657).......................................................9 Carlo Antonio Manzini, le conquiste del microscopio (1661)...........................................................10 Robert Hooke: un ampliamento del dominio dei sensi (1665) ..........................................................11 Anonimo: "Modo di adoperare il microscopio" (1665-1667)............................................................13 Lorenzo Magalotti: la digestione d’alcuni animali (1667).................................................................14 Francesco
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionoftherm00boltrich.Pdf
    Evolution of the Thermometer Dalence's Thermometer 1688. Evolution of the Thermometer^ 3> BY HENRY CARRINGTON BOLTON Author of Scientific Correspondence of Joseph Priestley EASTON, PA.: THE CHEMICAL PUBLISHING Co. 1900. COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY EDWARD HART. CONTENTS. I. The Open Air-thermometer of Galileo, . 5 II.. Thermoscopes of the Accademia del Cimento, 25 III. Attempts to obtain a scale from Boyle to Newton, 41 IV. Fahrenheit and the first reliable Thermom- eters 61 V. Thermometers of Reaumur, Celsius, and others 79 Table of Thirty-five Thermometer Scales,. 88 Chronological Epitome, 90 Authorities, 92 Index, 97 91629 EVOLUTION OF THE THERMOMETER I. THE OPEN AIR-THERMOMETER OF GALILEO. Discoveries and inventions are sometimes the product of the genius or of the intelligent in- dustry of a single person and leave his hand in a perfect state, as was the case with the ba- rometer invented by Torricelli, but more often the seed of the invention is planted by one, cultivated by others, and the fruit is gathered only after slow growth by some one who ig- nores the original sower. In studying the ori- gin and tracing the history of certain discov- eries of scientific and practical value one is often perplexed by encountering several claim- ants for priority, this is partly due to the cir- " cumstance that coincidence of independent thought is often the cause of two or more per- " sons reaching the same result about the same time and to the effort of each nation ; partly to secure for its own people credit and renown. Again, the origin of a prime invention is some- i 6 EVOLUTION OF THE THERMOMETER, times obscured by the failure of the discoverer to claim definitely the product of his inspira- tion owing to the fact that he himself failed to appreciate its high importance and its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Galileo's Experiments with Pendulums
    BJHS, Page 1 of 35. f British Society for the History of Science 2009 doi:10.1017/S0007087409990033 A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums PAOLO PALMIERI* Abstract. The paper reports new findings about Galileo’s experiments with pendulums and discusses their significance in the context of Galileo’s writings. The methodology is based on a phenomenological approach to Galileo’s experiments, supported by computer modelling and close analysis of extant textual evidence. This methodology has allowed the author to shed light on some puzzles that Galileo’s experiments have created for scholars. The pendulum was crucial throughout Galileo’s career. Its properties, with which he was fascinated from very early in his career, especially concern time. A 1602 letter is the earliest surviving document in which Galileo discusses the hypothesis of pendulum isochronism.1 In this letter Galileo claims that all pendulums are isochronous, and that he has long been trying to demonstrate isochronism mechanically, but that so far he has been unable to succeed. From 1602 onwards Galileo referred to pendulum isochronism as an admirable property but failed to demonstrate it. The pendulum is the most open-ended of Galileo’s artefacts. After working on my reconstructed pendulums for some time, I became convinced that the pendulum had the potential to allow Galileo to break new ground. But I also realized that its elusive nature sometimes threatened to undermine the progress Galileo was making on other fronts. It is this ambivalent nature that, I thought, might prove invaluable in trying to understand crucial aspects of Galileo’s innovative methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Saint in the History of Cardiology
    Arch Cardiol Mex. 2014;84(1):47---50 www.elsevier.com.mx SPECIAL ARTICLE A saint in the history of Cardiology Alfredo de Micheli ∗, Raúl Izaguirre Ávila National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chavez, Tlalpan, DF, Mexico Received 19 December 2012; accepted 22 January 2013 KEYWORDS Abstract Niels Stensen (1638---1686) was born in Copenhagen. He took courses in medicine Niels Stensen; at the local university under the guidance of Professor Thomas Bartholin and later at Leiden Anatomy; under the tutelage of Franz de la Boë (Sylvius). While in Holland, he discovered the existence of Physiology; the parotid duct, which was named Stensen’s duct or stenonian duct (after his Latinized name Muscular fibers; Nicolaus Stenon). He also described the structural and functional characteristics of peripheral Heart muscles and myocardium. He demonstrated that muscular contraction could be elicited by appropriate nerve stimulation and by direct stimulation of the muscle itself and that during contraction the latter does not increase in volume. Toward the end of 1664, the Academic Senate of the University of Leiden awarded him the doctor in medicine title. Later, in Florence, he was admitted as a corresponding member in the Academia del Cimento (Experimental Academy) and collaborated with the Tuscan physician Francesco Redi in studies relating to viviparous development. In the Tuscan capital, he converted from Lutheranism to Catholicism and was shortly afterwards ordained in the clergy. After a few years, he was appointed apostolic vicar in northern Germany and died in the small town of Schwerin, capital of the Duchy of Mecklenburg- Schwerin on November 25, 1686.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The academization of art A practice approach to the early histories of the Accademia del Disegno and the Accademia di San Luca Jonker, M.J. Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Jonker, M. J. (2017). The academization of art: A practice approach to the early histories of the Accademia del Disegno and the Accademia di San Luca. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 Appendix 1 Money in Florence and Rome in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Florence 1 scudo = 7 lire = 140 soldi = 1680 danari 1 giulio = 13 soldi and 4 danari 1 carlino = 10 soldi Rome 1 scudo = 10 giuli and 100 baiocchi 1 giulio = 10 baiocchi 1 grosso = 5 baiocchi 1 quatttrino = 1/5 of a baioccho 435 Appendix 2 Letters from Agnolo Guicciardini to Cosimo I de’ Medici AG, Legazione, XII, 18 (Published in Ridolfi 1931, 46-47).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Publication Year 2020-05-18T17:09:00Z Acceptance
    Publication Year 2019 Acceptance in OA@INAF 2020-05-18T17:09:00Z Title Della Porta, Colonna e Fontana e le prime osservazioni astronomiche a Napoli Authors GARGANO, MAURO DOI 10.35948/9788869521188/c25 Handle http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/24943 Della Porta, Colonna e Fontana e le prime osservazioni astronomiche a Napoli Mauro Gargano ‒ INAF ‒ Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte ‒ [email protected] Abstract: Giovan Battista Della Porta is known for his idea of experimental science, Fabio Colonna is well-known for his botanical studies, and Fran- cesco Fontana for his powerful telescopes and the exact observations of the Moon and planets. All three interested in astronomy. But when and what was observed in Naples for the first time with a telescope? And by whom? This communication, based on the correspondence of the protagonists, wants to contribute to retrace the events of the first Neapolitan astronomical observations. Keywords: Astronomy, Telescopes, Observations, Giovanni Battista Della Porta, Fabio Colonna, Francesco Fontana. 1. Il cannocchiale di Galileo «El S.r Galileo de i Galiliegi, vero arecoltore delle smatemateghe, e slenzaore in lo Bo de Pava à gi scuelari della so prefission» è l’intestazione di una dedicatoria in dialetto pavano scritta nel marzo 1608 dal gioviale poeta e pittore padovano Giuseppe Gagliardi (Firenze, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale (FBNC), Manoscritti Galileiani (Mss. Gal.), Gagliardi 1608, P. I, T. III, cc. 68-82). In quest’epoca il “Coltivatore” Galilei è senza dubbio un raffinato professore dell’Università di Padova e un eccellente costruttore di strumenti matematici. Lo scienziato di Pisa comincia a praticare l’astronomia con l’esplosione “de stella nova in pede serpentari” verso la fine dell’ottobre 1604.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Paola Malanotte Rizzoli Place of Birth: Lonigo (Vicenza), Italy Home Address: 75 Cambridge Parkway, #W502 Cambridge, MA 02142 Work Address: Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room 54-1416 . Cambridge, MA 02139 EDUCATION 1978 Ph.D., Physical Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, Dissertation: “Solitary Rossby Waves Over Variable Relief and Their Stability Properties” 1968 Ph.D., Physics, University of Padua, Italy, “summa cum laude” Dissertation: “Quantum-mechanical structure of biologically important molecules. Investigation of the complex molecules of nucleic acids” 1963 B.S., Physics and Mathematics, Lyceum “Benedetti,” Venice, Italy; with highest honors EMPLOYMENT 1997 - 2009 MIT Director of the Joint Program in Oceanography and Ocean Engineering between M.I.T. and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) 1992- Professor of Physical Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1987-1992 Associate Professor of Physical Oceanography with tenure, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1985-1987 Associate Professor of Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1981-1985 Assistant Professor of Oceanography, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1978-1980 Cecil and Ida Green Scholar at the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at San Diego (when on leave of absence from Italy) 2 1976-1981 Senior Scientist (tenured) at the “Istituto Dinamica Grande Masse,” CNR, Venice, Italy 1972-1976
    [Show full text]
  • Physics in Italy from 1870 to 1940 Antonio Casella, Silvana Galdabini
    Physics in Italy from 1870 to 1940 Antonio Casella, Silvana Galdabini, Giuseppe Giuliani, Paolantonio Marazzini Gruppo Nazionale di Storia della Fisica del CNR, Unit`adi Pavia The fact that, as you know, this Conference will be followed by another one dedicated to a century of physics in Italy, has induced us to present here firstly a general overview of our research, then a brief outline af our most recent findings. Our research started in the fall of 1983 as a project limited to the pre- history of solid state physics in Italy. It began with a study of the institutional context of physical research between 1870 and 1940, with particular attention given to the four decades of our century. The analisys of scientific production in fields that would have become parts of today solid state physics has not been completed. We have studied in some detail only five topics: magnetic properties • galvanomagnetic effects • elastic properties • photoelectric effect and photoconductivity • electric conductivity. • However it must be stressed that these five topics cover about 75% of the entire production concerning `solid state'. Moreover, it is in these fields that Italian contribution has been, for several reasons, more interesting. The results of this first effort have been described and discussed, among others, in the publications reported in footnotes.1;2;3;4 The study of the pre-history of solid state physics has found a kind of accomplishment in the organisation of a meeting on `The origins of solid state physics in Italy: 1945-1960', held in Pavia in 1987. Apart from five lectures given by historians, the contributions came from physicists who contributed to the development of this field in Italy (16) and abroad (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Birth and Life of Scientific Collections in Florence
    BIRTH AND LIFE OF SCIENTIFIC COLLECTIONS IN FLORENCE Mara Miniati 1 RESUMO: em Florença. Este artigo descreve as trans- formações ocorridas entre os séculos 18 e O artigo centra-se na história das coleções 19 na vida cultural da capital da Toscana: as científicas em Florença. Na era dos Medici, artes e ciências foram promovidos, e os flo- Florença foi um importante centro de pes- rentinos cultivados estavam interessadas no quisa científica e de coleções. Este aspecto desenvolvimento recente da física, na Itália e da cultura florentina é geralmente menos no exterior. Nesse período, numerosas co- conhecido, mas a ciência e coleções científi- leções científicas privadas e públicas de Flo- cas foram uma parte consistente da história rença existentes, que eram menos famosas, da cidade. O recolhimento de instrumentos mas não menos importantes do que as co- científicos era um componente importante leções Médici e Lorena se destacaram. Final- das estratégias políticas dos grão-duques flo- mente, o artigo descreve como as coleções rentinos, convencidos de que o conhecimen- florentinas se desenvolveram. A fundação to científico e controle tecnológico sobre do Instituto e Museu de História da Ciência a natureza conferiria solidez e prestígio ao deu nova atenção aos instrumentos cientí- seu poder político. De Cosimo I a Cosimo ficos antigos. Sua intensa atividade de pes- III, os grão-duques Médici concederam o seu quisa teve um impacto sobre a organização patrocínio e comissões sobre gerações de do Museu. Novos estudos levaram a novas engenheiros e cientistas, formando uma co- atribuições aos instrumentos científicos, as leção de instrumentos matemáticos e astro- investigações de arquivamento contribuiram nômicos, os modelos científicos e produtos para um melhor conhecimento da coleção, naturais, exibidos ao lado das mais famosas e os contactos crescentes com instituições coleções de arte na Galleria Uffizi, no Pala- italianas e internacionais feitas do Museu zzo Pitti, e em torno da cidade de Florença tornaram-no cada vez mais ativo em uma e outros lugares da Toscana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paper Museum of Cassiano Dal Pozzo
    The Paper Museum of Cassiano dal Pozzo Brent Elliott Historian Royal Horticultural Society The Paper Museum of Cassiano dal Pozzo - a unique publishing project DRAWINGS AND PRINTS IN THE ROYAL LIBRARY AT WINDSOR CASTLE, THE BRITISH MUSEUM, THE INSTITUT DE FRANCE AND OTHER COLLECTIONS Cassiano dal Pozzo (1588-1657) Life of Cassiano • 1588 born in Torino, grandson of the prime minister • educated at the University of Pisa • 1612 moved to Rome • 1615 began collecting his “museo cartaceo” • 1623 Secretary to Cardinal Barberini • 1633 purchased Cesi’s library Museo Cartaceo: a collection of drawings amassed by Cassiano, by commission, purchase, and inheritance, on themes of natural history, architecture and antiquities Prince Federico Cesi (1585-1630) Life of Federico Cesi • 1585 born at Rome, son of the Marchese de Monticelli • 1603 founds Accademia dei Lincei (other members: Francisco Stelluti, Johannes van Heeck [Heckius], Anastasio di Filiis) • Cesi’s father forbids the association • 1610 Giambattista della Porta joins the Accademia • 1611 Galileo Galilei joins the Accademia • 1613 Cesi publishes Galileo’s letter on sunspots • 1618 Cesi moves to Acquasparta • 1624 Galileo gives Cesi a microscope • 1630 Cesi dies • 1633 Cassiano dal Pozzo buys Cesi’s library The later history of the Paper Museum • 1657 Cassiano dal Pozzo bequeaths the Paper Museum to his heirs • Early C18 Cassiano’s heirs sell the Paper Museum to Pope Clement XI Albani • 1762 George III buys the Paper Museum from the Albani family, and transfers it to Buckingham House •
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge, Freedom, and Brotherly Love: Homosociality and the Accademia Dei Lincei Mario Biagioli Special Cluster: Gender and Early-Modern Science
    Copyright © 1995, The Johns Hopkins University Press and the Society for Literature and Science. All rights reserved. Configurations 3.2 (1995) 139-166 ../toc Knowledge, Freedom, and Brotherly Love: Homosociality and the Accademia dei Lincei Mario Biagioli Special Cluster: Gender and Early-Modern Science The Accademia dei Lincei, often considered the earliest of scientific organizations, was established in 1603 by Federico Cesi, a young Roman aristocrat who was soon to become prince of San Polo and Sant'Angelo, duke of Aquasparta, and marquis of Monticelli. 1 After a period of very limited activity, which lasted until 1609, the academy quickly revived its membership and visibility, and by 1611 it included prestigious figures like Galileo and Giovanbattista della Porta. Its ranks continued to increase until 1625, when it listed thirty-two members, most of them located in Rome, Naples, and Florence. 2 The Lincei became an important reference point in the fledgling Italian philosophical community and played a relevant role in Galileo's later career, but it collapsed shortly after the prince's death in 1630. Cesi left behind a vast, elaborate, and well-documented academic project that usually bore little more than a family resemblance to the [End Page 139] actual academy. This essay analyzes the gender dimensions of Cesi's project and traces them into some aspects of the academy's historical record. Unlike all other seventeenth-century scientific academies that excluded women from their membership without making that ban explicit or providing reasons for their policies, the Lincei's oath stated that the academy was a "philosophical army" whose recruits were exclusively male.
    [Show full text]
  • HORUS'tan GÜNÜMÜZE İLLUMİNATİ Ve YENİ DÜNYA DÜZENİ
    HORUS’TAN GÜNÜMÜZE İLLUMİNATİ ve YENİ DÜNYA DÜZENİ Veli Metin Türkoğlu Kutlu Yayınevi İstanbul – 2021 T. C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı yayıncı belgesi: 44113 bétik: 786 Yazar: Veli Metin TÜRKOĞLU Düzenleyici: V. Metin TÜRKOĞLU Dizer: Deniz ÇATICI Kapak tasarımcısı: V. Metin TÜRKOĞLU 1. baskı: Şubat, 2021 – İstanbul ISBN: 978-625-7665-08-7 © Veli Metin TÜRKOĞLU Tüm içerik yazarının sorumluluğundadır. Yayınevi yalnızca basım, dağıtım ve satış işlemlerinden yükümlüdür. KUTLU YAYINEVİ – göksel sözcükleriñ yayıncısı Siyavuşpaşa Mah. Aydede Sok. No: 2A Bahçelievler/İstanbul Çağrı: 0212 603 5661 [email protected] Kaya Basımevi: 47102 HORUS’TAN GÜNÜMÜZE İLLUMİNATİ ve YENİ DÜNYA DÜZENİ Veli Metin Türkoğlu ! Tüm hakları saklıdır © Sadece okunabilir. Hiçbir içerik izin alınmadan kullanılamaz. İÇİNDEKİLER GİRİŞ …………………………………………………………………. 13 Yeni Dünya Düzeni (Tek Din – Tek Yönetim) …............ 15 Armageddon (Kıyamet Savaşı) …………………………….. 18 Yeni Dünya Düzeni Huzur ve Mutluluk Getirir mi …. 19 Yeni Dünya Düzeni ve Mısır’ın Tanrı Kralları ………… 21 Uygarlaşma ve Yeni Dünya Düzeni ……………………….. 21 HORUS’TAN İLLUMİNATİ’YE TAPINAKÇILARIN İNANÇ, GELENEK ve SEMBOLLERİNİN KÖKENİ ………………………………….. 27 Hz. Yakup ……………………………………………………………. 32 Hz. Yusuf …………………………………………………………….. 34 Hz. Musa ……………………………………………………………... 36 Hz. Davut …………………………………………………………….. 40 Hz. Süleyman ………………………………………………………. 41 Mitra İnancı ………………………………………………………… 46 Gül Haç Kardeşliği Oluşmaya Başladı ……………………. 50 Hz. İsa ………………………………………………………………… 56 Hristiyanlığın Dönemleri …………………………………….
    [Show full text]