Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opisthokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa ⇑ Thomas Cavalier-Smith , Ema E
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81 (2014) 71–85 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa ⇑ Thomas Cavalier-Smith , Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney 1, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno 2, Rhodri Lewis Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK article info abstract Article history: Animals and fungi independently evolved from the protozoan phylum Choanozoa, these three groups Received 24 January 2014 constituting a major branch of the eukaryotic evolutionary tree known as opisthokonts. Opisthokonts Revised 2 August 2014 and the protozoan phylum Amoebozoa (amoebae plus slime moulds) were previously argued to have Accepted 11 August 2014 evolved independently from the little-studied, largely flagellate, protozoan phylum, Sulcozoa. Sulcozoa Available online 23 August 2014 are a likely evolutionary link between opisthokonts and the more primitive excavate flagellates that have ventral feeding grooves and the most primitive known mitochondria. To extend earlier sparse evidence Keywords: for the ancestral (paraphyletic) nature of Sulcozoa, we sequenced transcriptomes from six gliding flagel- Cell evolution lates (two apusomonads; three planomonads; Mantamonas). Phylogenetic analyses of 173–192 genes and Eukaryote phylogeny Podiates 73–122 eukaryote-wide taxa show Sulcozoa as deeply paraphyletic, confirming that opisthokonts and Protozoa Amoebozoa independently evolved from sulcozoans by losing their ancestral ventral groove and dorsal Transcriptome sequencing pellicle: Apusozoa (apusomonads plus anaerobic breviate amoebae) are robustly sisters to opisthokonts Sulcozoa and probably paraphyletic, breviates diverging before apusomonads; Varisulca (planomonads, Manta- monas, and non-gliding flagellate Collodictyon) are sisters to opisthokonts plus Apusozoa and Amoebozoa, and possibly holophyletic; Glissodiscea (planomonads, Mantamonas) may be holophyletic, but Manta- monas sometimes groups with Collodictyon instead. Taxon and gene sampling slightly affects tree topol- ogy; for the closest branches in Sulcozoa and opisthokonts, proportionally reducing missing data eliminates conflicts between homogeneous-model maximum-likelihood trees and evolutionarily more realistic site-heterogeneous trees. Sulcozoa, opisthokonts, and Amoebozoa constitute an often-pseudopo- dial ‘podiate’ clade, one of only three eukaryotic ’supergroups’. Our trees indicate that evolution of sulco- zoan dorsal pellicle, ventral pseudopodia, and ciliary gliding (probably simultaneously) generated podiate eukaryotes from Malawimonas-like excavate flagellates. Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). 1. Introduction derived Fungi that lost them (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). Originally ‘excavates’ excluded Euglenozoa (Simpson and Patterson, 1999), Phylogenetically, all eukaryotes have been assigned to just but later these distinctive flagellates were included despite not three supergroups: podiates, corticates (kingdoms Plantae and sharing excavate morphology (Cavalier-Smith, 2002, 2003; Chromista), and Eozoa (excavates and Euglenozoa) (Cavalier- Simpson, 2003) under the influence of a probably erroneous Smith, 2013a). The entirely heterotrophic podiates, the focus of this assumption about the location of the eukaryotic root; here we fol- paper, include Animalia, Fungi, and four protozoan phyla (Sulco- low Cavalier-Smith (2010a, 2013a) in excluding Euglenozoa from zoa, Amoebozoa, Choanozoa Microsporidia); they are so called excavates. Multigene trees usually show corticates as a clade, but because of the general presence of pseudopodia except in the are contradictory concerning the boundary between the excavate Eozoa and the putatively basal podiate phylum Sulcozoa. The prob- ⇑ Corresponding author. lem lies in the uncertain phylogenetic position of the excavate fla- E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Cavalier-Smith). gellate Malawimonas (Brown et al., 2013; Derelle and Lang, 2012; 1 Present address: Station Biologique de Roscoff, UMR7144/Groupe Evolution et10 Hampl et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2012, 2013). Some multigene trees PaléOcéans, CNRS/Université Paris VI, Roscoff, France. show podiates as a clade with Malawimonas one node deeper (e.g. 2 Present address: Zoology Institute, Terrestrial Ecology Group, Faculty of Math- Brown et al., 2013); others place Malawimonas within podiates, ematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Biozentrum Köln, Zülpicher Str. typically as sister to the sulcozoan flagellate Collodictyon (e.g. 47b, D-50674 Köln, Germany. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 1055-7903/Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). 72 T. Cavalier-Smith et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81 (2014) 71–85 Zhao et al., 2012, 2013). Either position is consistent with the pos- eton of the ventral feeding groove of Sulcozoa and excavates: tulate that the evolutionary transitions between the three super- opisthokonts, whose ancestor lost the anterior cilium and became groups (Fig. 1) all involved biciliate ventrally grooved cells uniciliate like human sperm, and Amoebozoa, which developed morphologically similar to Malawimonas (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). pseudopodia for efficient locomotion (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). A Podiates are proposed to have arisen from a Malawimonas-like 16-gene tree weakly grouped three sulcozoan orders as a clade, ancestor by evolving ventral pseudopodia and novel dorsal semi- but was based on only three or four genes for apusomonads and rigid pellicle and abandoning swimming in the plankton in favour planomonads (Katz et al., 2011), the best studied gliding sulcozoan of a benthic habitat, gliding on the posterior cilium over surfaces in flagellates; a sulcozoan clade was not seen in a 30-gene tree with search of prey (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). four Sulcozoa, because Malawimonas was weakly within Sulcozoa To clarify the deep branching of podiates one must determine (Grant et al., 2012). A study of 159 genes weakly excluded Malawi- the relationships of the various groups of Sulcozoa, a recently monas from Sulcozoa and podiates, but showed two or three dis- established protozoan phylum of mainly gliding flagellates. Sulco- tinct sulcozoan clades at the base of podiates, though sampling zoa are morphologically unified by a unique cell structure, combin- only five Sulcozoa from three orders, and only Collodictyon repre- ing ventral feeding groove, pseudopodia to catch prey (not for senting subphylum Varisulca (Brown et al., 2013). Brown et al. locomotion), and rigid dorsal pellicle (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). Sul- (2013) concluded that Apusozoa were paraphyletic; their trees also cozoa comprise subphyla Apusozoa (apusomonads and breviates) confirmed earlier evidence that Collodictyon branched deeper still, and Varisulca, proposed as the most basal podiate group as the most divergent podiate lineage to date, making Sulcozoa the (Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). Sulcozoa are phylogenetically important ancestral (paraphyletic) podiate group. as likely ancestors of two major groups, whose cell structure is pro- Most Sulcozoa are gliding not swimming flagellates: apusomo- posed to have been radically simplified from the complex cytoskel- nads (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2010) and planomonads (Cavalier- Smith et al., 2008) and Mantamonas (Glücksman et al., 2011) (the latter two grouped as Glissodiscea) glide over surfaces on their posterior cilium held rigidly behind their cell like a ski. Sulcozoa podiates also include Diphylleida (Brugerolle et al., 2002; Cavalier-Smith, ANIMALIA FUNGI 2003), alga-eating grooved swimming flagellates with two or four Microsporidia cilia, which emit pseudopodia from their groove and whose cyto- skeleton is substantially modified compared with gliding Sulcozoa corticates (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2010; Cavalier-Smith, 2013a). Diphylle- Amoebozoa ids, sometimes included in Apusozoa or Excavata (Cavalier-Smith, Choanozoa PLANTAE CHROMISTA 2003), were recently grouped with Glissodiscea and the non-flagel- CHLOROPLAST late Rigifilida (Yabuki et al., 2013) as Varisulca (Cavalier-Smith, Sulcozoa groove Colponema 2013a). Previously Glissodiscea included the gliding flagellate Dis- ciliary gliding pseudopodia cortical alveoli cocelia (Vørs, 1988; Cavalier-Smith, 2013a), but rRNA trees put it in Cercozoa (Cavalier-Smith et al., in preparation). Breviate amoebae neozoa lost the posterior cilium and glide instead by the remaining ante- cytopharynx Eozoa rior cilium held rigidly ahead (Heiss et al., 2013), and have become Excavata secondarily anaerobic. Ciliary gliding, pseudopodia, and dorsal pel- groove Euglenozoa licle differentiate Sulcozoa from the excavate phylum Loukozoa, Jakoba (Loukozoa) which includes Malawimonas, secondarily anaerobic metamonad flagellates like Giardia, and jakobid flagellates with the most prim- Fig. 1. Likely relationships amongst the eukaryote supergroups (podiates, corti- itive mitochondria (Lang et al., 1997; Burger et al., 2013). cates, Eozoa) highlighting major steps in eukaryote cell diversification. Group names in red are opisthokonts; those in green were ancestrally photosynthetic. The A better sulcozoan phylogeny is crucial