In Re: Beckman Coulter, Inc., Securities Litigation 10-CV-01327

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Re: Beckman Coulter, Inc., Securities Litigation 10-CV-01327 Case 8:10-cv-01327-JST -RNB Document 59 Filed 09/19/11 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1064 1 Christopher J. Keller Sherrie R. Savett dmitted pro hac vice) admitted pro hac vice) 2 Christopher J. McDonald Barbara A. Podell (admitted pro hac vice) (admitted pro hac vice) 3 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP Douglas M. Risen 140 Broadwa (admitted pro hac vice) 4 New York, Nyew York 10005 Eric Lechtzin (Bar No. 248958) Telephone: (212) 907-0700 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. 5 Facsimile: {{212) 818-0477 1622 Locust Street Email: [email protected] Philadelphia Pennsylvania 19103 6 Telephone: 215) 875-3071 Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Facsimile: (215) 875-5715 7 Class Email: [email protected] g Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Mark Labaton (Bar No. 159555) and the Class 9 MOTLEY RICE LLP 1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor 10 Los Angeles, California 90024 Telephone: (310) 500-3488 11 Facsimile: (310) 824.2870 Email: [email protected] 12 Liaison Counsel for the Class 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 Case No.: 8: X 0-ev-L327-JST (RNBx) 17 IN RE BECKMAN COULTER, INC. DECLARATION OF SECURITIES LITIGATION CHRISTOPHER J. MCDONALD 18 IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED 19 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 20 SETTLEMENT 21 Judge: Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker Date: Oct. 24, 2011 22 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: l 0A 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER J. MCDONALD IN SUPPORT OP LEAD PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, CASE NO.: 8:16-cv- 1327-JST (RNBx) Case 8:1 0-cv-01327-JST -RNB Document 59 Filed 09/19/11 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1065 1 I, CHRISTOPHER J. MCDONALD, declare as follows pursuant to 28 2 U.S.C.§1746: 3 1. I am a member of the law firm of Labaton Sucharow LLP, court- 4 appointed Lead Counsel, together with Berger & Montague, P.C., for Lead 5 Plaintiff Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Iron Workers District Council 6 of New England Pension Fund and the Class, and am admitted to practice pro hac 7 vice before this Court. I respectfully submit this Declaration in support of Lead 8 Plaintiff s Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 9 and the Memorandum of Paints and Authorities in support thereof. I have personal 10 knowledge of the matters testified to herein. 11 2. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the 12 Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of September 13, 2011. 13 3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the firm 14 resume of Labaton Sucharow LLP, Lead Counsel in the Action. 15 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the firm 16 resume of Berger & Montague, P.C., Lead Counsel in the Action. 17 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of material 18 concerning the proposed claims administrator, A.B. Data., Ltd.. 19 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and 20 correct. 21 22 Dated: September 16, 2011 23 24 ^- Christopff^. McDonald (admitted pro hac vice) 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER J. MCDONALD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SrTTLEWN'r, CASE No.: 8:10-CV-1327-JST (RNBx) EXHIBIT 1 EXECUTION COPY 1 Christopher J. Keller Sherrie R. Savett 2 (admitted pro hac vice) (admitted pro hac vice) Christopher J. McDonald Barbara A. Podell 3 (admitted pro hac vice) (admitted pro hac vice) LABATON SUCHAROW LLP Douglas M. Risen 4 140 Broadway (admitted pro hac vice) New York, New York 10005 Eric Lechtzin (Bar No. 248958) 5 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. Facsimile: (212) 818-0477 1622 Locust Street 6 Email: [email protected] Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Telephone: (215) 875-3071 7 Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Facsimile: (215) 875-5715 Class Email: [email protected] 8 Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 9 Mark Labaton (Bar No. 159555) and the Class MOTLEY RICE LLP 10 1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor Los Angeles, California 90024 11 Telephone: (310) 500-3488 Facsimile: (310) 824-2870 12 Email: [email protected] 13 Liaison Counsel for the Class 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 ) 17 ) Case No.: 8:10-cv-1327-JST (RNBx) ) 18 IN RE BECKMAN COULTER, INC. ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 19 ) ) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker 20 ) ) 21 ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case No.: 8:10-cv-1327-JST (RNBx) 1 This stipulation and agreement of settlement (the “Stipulation” or 2 “Settlement”) is made and entered into by and between Arkansas Teacher 3 Retirement System and Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension 4 Fund (“Lead Plaintiff”), on behalf of itself and the putative Class (defined below), 5 and Beckman Coulter, Inc. (“Beckman” or the “Company”), and the Individual 6 Defendants (defined below, and together with the Company, the “Defendants”). 7 WHEREAS: 8 A. All words or terms used herein that are capitalized shall have the 9 meaning ascribed to those words or terms as set forth herein and in ¶ 1 hereof 10 entitled “Definitions.” 11 B. In September 2010, two proposed class actions were filed against the 12 Defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California 13 (the “Court”) captioned, respectively, City of Southfield Fire & Police Ret. System 14 v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., Case No. 8:10-cv-1327 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2010) and 15 Pinchuck v. Beckman Coulter, Inc., Case No. 8:10 cv-1334 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 7, 16 2010). On December 8, 2010, the Court issued an order consolidating these cases 17 into the present Action and appointing Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and 18 Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension Fund as Lead Plaintiff, 19 permitting Steelworkers Pension Trust to serve as a named Plaintiff (collectively 20 “Plaintiffs”), and appointing Labaton Sucharow LLP and Berger & Montague, P.C. 21 as Lead Counsel for the putative Class. 22 C. Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint for 23 Violations of Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) on February 7, 2011 24 against the Defendants, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the 25 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) on behalf of any person or 26 entity who purchased or otherwise acquired Beckman common stock between July 27 31, 2009 and July 22, 2010, inclusive, and who were allegedly damaged thereby. 28 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 2 Case No.: 8:10-cv-1327-JST (RNBx) 1 D. On April 22, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, which was 2 currently pending before the Court at the time of this Settlement. 3 E. Lead Plaintiff, through Lead Counsel, states that it conducted a 4 thorough investigation relating to the claims and underlying events and 5 transactions of the Action. This process included reviewing and analyzing: 6 Beckman’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); 7 securities analysts’ reports; public statements by Defendants; media reports about 8 Defendants; court records in multiple actions involving Beckman; trading data; 9 documents obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration 10 (“FDA”) pursuant to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act; recall 11 notices of Beckman’s products dating back to January 2006; adverse event reports 12 from the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database; and 13 product and other information available on Beckman’s website, 14 www.beckmancoulter.com. 15 F. Lead Counsel also states that it interviewed more than 60 former 16 employees of Beckman and consulted with FDA industry experts regarding, among 17 other things, medical devices and radiation producing electronic products, site and 18 plant inspections, good manufacturing practices, quality control, health and safety 19 requirements, and pre-market notification requirements pursuant to Section 510(k) 20 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 360(k)), as well as 21 damages experts. 22 G. On June 9, 2011, Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants (collectively, the 23 “Parties”) participated in a mediation regarding potential settlement of the Action 24 facilitated by the Honorable Daniel Weinstein of JAMS. In connection with the 25 mediation process, the Parties exchanged confidential mediation statements and 26 information regarding their respective views of the merits of the claims and of 27 alleged damages. In connection with the mediation process, Lead Plaintiff and 28 Lead Counsel conducted arm’s-length negotiations with counsel for Defendants STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 3 Case No.: 8:10-cv-1327-JST (RNBx) 1 with respect to a potential compromise and settlement of the Action with a view to 2 achieving the best relief possible consistent with the interests of the Class. 3 H. Based upon their investigation and the mediation, Lead Plaintiff and 4 Lead Counsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of this Settlement are 5 fair, reasonable and adequate to Plaintiffs and the Class. Lead Plaintiff believes 6 that the claims asserted in the Action have merit and that evidence developed to 7 date supports the claims asserted. However, Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel 8 recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings 9 necessary to prosecute the Action against the Defendants through trial and appeals. 10 Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain 11 outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as the 12 Action, and the possibility that the Court could dismiss the Action with prejudice 13 on a ruling on the Defendants’ motion to dismiss or at summary judgment.
Recommended publications
  • Participant List
    Participant list Please find below a list of current participants in theAustralian Life Sciences Remuneration Review. For a complete list by super sector, sector and segment refer to Mercer WIN®. A. Menarini Australia B Braun Avitum Australia Cardinal Health AbbVie Australia Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Cepheid Abbott Australasia Baxter Healthcare Cochlear Acrux Bayer Coloplast Australia Alcon Beckman Coulter - Diagnostics Convatec (Australia) Alere Beckman Coulter - Life Sciences CooperVision Australia Allergan Becton Dickinson DH Dental Alphapharm Besins Healthcare Australia DSM Nutritional Products Amgen Biogen Idec Australia Device Technologies Aust Ascom Australia Biomerieux Australia Ecolab Aspen Australia Blackmores Edwards Lifesciences Astellas Pharma Boehringer Ingelheim Eisai Australia AstraZeneca Boston Scientific International Elanco Australasia Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Boucher & Muir Eli Lilly Australia Organisation (ANSTO) Bristol-Myers Squibb Evolution Health Australian Pharmaceutical Industries CSL Ferring Pharmaceuticals B Braun Australia © September 2020 Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Australian Life Sciences Remuneration Review 4.1 Participant list Fresenius Kabi Australia Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) Merck Serono Fresenius Medical Care Australia Invisalign Australia Mindray Medical International GE Australia Healthcare Ipsen Molnlycke Health Care GN Netcom Australia J&J Pacific Mundipharma Galderma Australia Janssen-Cilag - Australia Nevro Medical Australia Getinge Johnson & Johnson Medical
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures
    ALA San Francisco Chapter Lessons Learned from Law Firm Failures Kristin Stark Principal, Fairfax Associates July 2016 Page 0 About Fairfax Fairfax Associates provides strategy and management consulting to law firms Strategy & Performance & Governance & Merger Direction Compensation Management Strategy Development and Partner Performance and Governance and Merger Strategy Implementation Compensation Management Firm Performance and Operational Structures & Practice Strategy Merger Search Profitability Improvement Reviews Market and Sector Merger Negotiation and Pricing Partnership Structure Research Structure Client Research and Key Process Improvement Alternative Business Models Client Development Merger Integration Page 1 1 Topics for Discussion • Disruptive Change • Dissolution Trends • Symptoms of Struggle: What Causes Law Firms to Fail? • What Keeps Firms From Changing? • Managing for Stability Page 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Today 10 Years 2004 Ago Number of US firms at $1 billion or 2327 4 more in revenue: Average gross revenue for Am Law $482$510 million $271 million 200: Median gross revenue for Am Law $310$328 million $193 million 200: NLJ 250 firms with single office 4 11 operations: Number of Am Law 200 lawyers 25,000 10,000 based outside US: Page 4 2 How Rapidly is the Legal Industry Changing? Changes to the Law Firm Business Model Underway • Convergence • Dramatic reduction • Disaggregation in costs • Increasing • Process Client commoditization Overhead improvement • New pricing Model efforts models • Outsourcing
    [Show full text]
  • 03.031 Socc04 Final 2(R)
    STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Prepared by Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation May 2008 STATEOF CENTER CITY 2008 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation 660 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA, 19106 215.440.5500 www.CenterCityPhila.org TABLEOFCONTENTSCONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 OFFICE MARKET 2 HEALTHCARE & EDUCATION 6 HOSPITALITY & TOURISM 10 ARTS & CULTURE 14 RETAIL MARKET 18 EMPLOYMENT 22 TRANSPORTATION & ACCESS 28 RESIDENTIAL MARKET 32 PARKS & RECREATION 36 CENTER CITY DISTRICT PERFORMANCE 38 CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENTS 44 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 48 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation www.CenterCityPhila.org INTRODUCTION CENTER CITY PHILADELPHIA 2007 was a year of positive change in Center City. Even with the new Comcast Tower topping out at 975 feet, overall office occupancy still climbed to 89%, as the expansion of existing firms and several new arrivals downtown pushed Class A rents up 14%. For the first time in 15 years, Center City increased its share of regional office space. Healthcare and educational institutions continued to attract students, patients and research dollars to downtown, while elementary schools experienced strong demand from the growing number of families in Center City with children. The Pennsylvania Convention Center expansion commenced and plans advanced for new hotels, as occupancy and room rates steadily climbed. On Independence Mall, the National Museum of American Jewish History started construction, while the Barnes Foundation retained designers for a new home on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway. Housing prices remained strong, rents steadily climbed and rental vacancy rates dropped to 4.6%, as new residents continued to flock to Center City. While the average condo sold for $428,596, 115 units sold in 2007 for more than $1 million, double the number in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Eprocurement Small Order Process: Vendors with Item Catalogs
    eProcurement Small Order Process: Vendors with Item Catalogs Updated April 18, 2012 V000142495 ABCAM INC V000137051 ILLUMINA INC V000081265 ACO MEDICAL SUPPLY V000014509 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC V000125369 ACTIVE MOTIF V000080847 INTREX COMPUTERS INC V000112094 AFFYMETRIX INC V000006118 INVITROGEN CORPORATION V000114793 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC V000130596 INVIVOGEN V000000082 ALLTECH ASSOCIATES INC V000005714 JACKSON IMMUNORES V000000118 AMRESCO V000001442 JACKSON LAB V000152997 ANASPEC INC V000001558 LABORATORY SAFETY V000132756 ASYLUM RESEARCH CORP V000047258 LABREPCO INC V000000126 ATCC V000108167 LEICA MICROSYSTEMS V000068824 ATLANTA BIOLOGICALS V000088788 LI-COR INC V000162435 ATLANTIC FITNESS V000111733 LIST BIOLOGICAL LABS V000000307 BASI V000002832 LONZA WALKERSVILLE INC V000000261 BD BIOSCIENCES V000149811 MATRIX TECH V000000259 BECKMAN COULTER V000135360 MEDICAL SPECIALTIES V000176191 BENCHMARK TECH V000022962 MIDWEST SCIENTIFIC V000101618 BETHYL LABS V000078901 MILTENYI BIOTEC INC V000159330 BIO BASIC V000008542 MOLECULAR DEVICES INC V000004901 BIOGENIX LABORATORIES V000001340 MP BIOMEDICALS V000145647 BIOLEGEND V000188293 NETA SCIENTIFIC INC V000157241 BIOLINE USA INC V000186184 NEWEAST BIOSCIENCES V000112934 BIOLOGICAL SPECIALTY CORP V000001880 NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS INC V000000303 BIO-RAD V000004850 NEWPORT V000000305 BIO-TEK INSTRUMENTS V000052248 NIKON INSTRUMENTS INC V000000349 BRAINTREE V000167597 OCEAN OPTICS V000190375 BUTLER SCHEIN V000001937 OLYMPUS AMERICA INC V000000429 CAMCOR V000139707 OPEN BIOSYSTEMS V000000454
    [Show full text]
  • Staying Put the Great Recession Led to a Ten-Year Low in Lateral Partner Moves
    www.americanlawyer.com February 2011 THE LATERAL REPORT STAYING PUT The Great Recession led to a ten-year low in lateral partner moves. BY VICTOR LI FTER A RECORD YEAR for lateral moves What accounts for the drop? For one thing, the 2009 in 2009, law firm partners looked around numbers were artificially high because the market was in 2010 and decided that there was flooded with partners from firms that went under, such as no place like home. In the 12-month Heller Ehrman, Thacher Proffitt & Wood, Thelen, and period ending September 30, 2010, WolfBlock. (Those four firms accounted for 15 percent only 2,014 partners left or joined of the 2009 moves.) Additionally, continued economic un- Am Law 200 firms. That number certainty in 2010 meant that some firms were reluctant to was a hefty decrease—27 percent—from the same period hire. “In general, firms have been much more opportunistic a year earlier, when a whopping 2,775 partners moved. In [about partner recruiting], and that’s due to the relative sta- fact, 2010 marked the lowest number of partner moves bilization of the industry,” says Ari Katz, national director since 2000, when only 1,859 partners switched firms, and of legal recruiting at Bingham McCutchen. was well off the average of 2,458 partner moves each year Still, some firms defied this trend. DLA Piper could from 2005 to 2009. have installed turnstiles in its lobbies with all the turnover Illustration By JOHN UELAND it experienced as it brought in 67 partners, more than any other Am Rochester-based partners departed for LeClairRyan after our survey Law 200 firm, and was also among the leaders in departures—42.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorable Nelson A. Diaz
    HONORABLE NELSON A. DIAZ Senior Attorney, Retired 1500 Market St., Suite 3500E 99 Park Avenue Assistant: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 Suite 320 Alicia Baldwin Phone (215) 575-7053 New York, New York 10016 Direct (215) 575-7173 Fax (215) 575-7200 Phone (917) 675-4254 [email protected] [email protected] Fax (212) 208-6874 Industries The Honorable Nelson Diaz concentrates his practice in the areas of litigation, dispute resolution, public housing issues and government relations. He has represented public entities, corporations, Construction Contracts and Labor hospitals, banks, and non-profit organizations in both state and federal courts. Construction Litigation Education Nelson served as a judge for the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas from 1981 through 1993. He was the youngest judge elected to the Court and the first Latino judge in Pennsylvania history. Practices Litigation In addition to his legal practice, Nelson served as the city solicitor of Philadelphia and was Real Estate appointed by President Clinton to be the general counsel for the U.S. Department of Housing and Repositioning Group Urban Development, where he focused on reforming public and mixed-use housing programs. Education Nelson also served as a White House Fellow as special assistant to Vice President Walter J.D., Temple University Mondale. James E. Beasley School of Law, 1972 Professional and Community Activities B.S., St. John's University, 1969 – Member of advisory committee of the Puerto Rican Arts Alliance Certificate on Mediation and Arbitration,
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Society Page It Was the Usual Political Overdose at the 109Th Annual Pennsylvania Society Confab
    The Annual Society Page It was the usual political overdose at the 109th annual Pennsylvania Society confab. by Mary F. Patel Published: Dec 12, 2007 It was the usual political overdose — from eating, drinking and running around to make all the parties — during last weekend's 109th annual Pennsylvania Society confab, held at the Waldorf- Astoria in midtown Manhattan. Despite the Pennsylvania moniker, the Society, which was founded by a consortium of journalists, politicians, businessmen and wealthy magnates, met in New York City because founding member Andrew Carnegie built the Waldorf. Back then, he convinced members to convene there, and the tradition has continued ever since. Events kicked off at noon Friday with the Republican State Committee's annual Commonwealth Club luncheon held at the Rainbow Room, costing $1,000. Next up was the Scrimmage Party at ESPN Zone; it was hosted by the sports-cable behemoth and Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney. That event rolled right into a reception honoring the new Pennsylvania House majority caucus at the InterContinental Hotel, which flowed into the "Friends of Jack Wagner" reception back at the Waldorf. (Wagner, a Democrat, is seeking re-election as auditor general.) Competing parties included the Waste Management Group and the Dan Onorato event — the Allegheny County chief executive is considered to be a future Democratic gubernatorial candidate — and state Sen. Dominic Pileggi's reception, before a bigger event hosted by Blank Rome at the InterContinental. Always popular, the Blank gig was packed despite the retirement of chairman David Girard-diCarlo. On the scene was former Democratic mayoral candidate Tom Knox, who said he is running for governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Plans Falter After Blast Debris Hundreds Soon As Possible,Even If It Is of Feet Into the Air
    nb30p01.qxp 7/20/2007 7:45 PM Page 1 TOP STORIES BUSINESS Tech demand LIVES returns PR firms New Yorkers follow to the glory days Angelina Jolie far PAGE 2 afield to adopt ® How people meters PAGE 27 are bringing oldies back to NY radio VOL. XXIII, NO. 30 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM JULY 23-29, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 PAGE 2 Mayor Bloomberg eyes a clear road on congestion Disaster pricing approval PAGE 3 plans falter News and Post buck national ad trends; Milford after blast Plaza gets redo NEW YORK, NEW YORK, P. 6 Firms scramble to keep operations going; Economic adages busy commercial district paralyzed for optimists who say market will rise der over and over; then the win- STILL FRESH: BY ELISABETH BUTLER CORDOVA dows shattered, and thick, dark GREG DAVID, PAGE 13 Contaminants AND AMANDA FUNG smoke flooded the of- haven’t been found in fice,”says David Bernard, imported first came the terrorist managing director of DB seafood in attacks on Sept. 11, Marketing Technolo- Chinatown. 2001, and then the 30- gies. The 10-employee hour blackout that hit on consulting firm is based Aug. 14, 2003. Each at 370 Lexington Ave., event sent an unmistak- one of the six buildings able message to New closest to the blast. York’s business commu- Mr. Bernard and his BUSINESS nity: Firms have to be colleagues hid under their OF SPORTS prepared to cope with the desks for several minutes. unexpected. Real estate When it became appar- G Suite deals at Now add the Man- at site* ent that the flow of mud stadiums bring teams hattan steam-pipe explo- pouring through the bro- sion of July 18, 2007— ken windows wasn’t abat- into 21st century buck ennis PAGE 17 which paralyzed one of ing, they fled down nine HIDDEN DANGER? the city’s busiest com- 1.6M flights of stairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 INVESTOR & ANALYST DAY December 14, 2017
    2017 INVESTOR & ANALYST DAY December 14, 2017 Forward Looking Statements Statements in this presentation that are not strictly historical, including any statements regarding events or developments that we believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results, developments and business decisions to differ materially from those suggested or indicated by such forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, deterioration of or instability in the economy, the markets we serve and the financial markets, contractions or growth rates and cyclicality of markets we serve, competition, our ability to develop and successfully market new products and technologies and expand into new markets, the potential for improper conduct by our employees, agents or business partners, our compliance with applicable laws and regulations (including regulations relating to medical devices and the health care industry), our ability to effectively address cost reductions and other changes in the health care industry, our ability to successfully identify, consummate and integrate appropriate acquisitions and successfully complete divestitures and other dispositions, our ability to integrate the recent acquisitions of Pall Corporation and Cepheid and achieve the anticipated benefits of such transactions, contingent
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.6175 - DANAHER/ BECKMAN COULTER
    EN Case No COMP/M.6175 - DANAHER/ BECKMAN COULTER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/06/2011 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32011M6175 Office for Publications of the European Union L-2985 Luxembourg EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.06.2011 C(2011)4423 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION general description. To the notifying party: Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.6175 - Danaher/ Beckman Coulter Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 139/20041 1. On 6 May 2011, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Djanet Acquisition Corp. (USA) controlled by Danaher Corporation (USA) ("Danaher") acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Beckman Coulter, Inc. (USA) ("Beckman") by way of public bid announced on 15 February 2011. Danaher and Beckman are designated hereinafter as the "parties (to the proposed transaction)"2. 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation").
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    2018 Annual Report Danaher 2018 Annual Report Financial Operating Highlights (dollars in millions except per share data and number of associates) 2018 2017 Sales $ 19,893.0 $ 18,329.7 Operating Profit $ 3,403.8 $ 2,990.4 Net Earnings $ 2,650.9 $ 2,469.8 Net Earnings Per Share (diluted) $ 3.74 $ 3.50 Operating Cash Flow $ 4,022.0 $ 3,477.8 Investing Cash Flow $ (2,949.4) $ (843.4) Financing Cash Flow $ (797.4) $ (3,098.5) Capital Expenditures $ (655.7) $ (619.6) Capital Disposals $ 6.3 $ 32.6 Free Cash Flow (Operating Cash Flow less Capital Expenditures plus Capital Disposals) $ 3,372.6 $ 2,890.8 Number of Associates 71,000 67,000 Total Assets $ 47,832.5 $ 46,648.6 Total Debt * $ 9,740.3 $ 10,522.1 Stockholders’ Equity $ 28,226.7 $ 26,367.8 Total Capitalization (Total Debt plus Stockholders’ Equity) $ 37,967.0 $ 36,889.9 * Long-Term Debt ($9,688.5 for 2018 and $10,327.4 for 2017) plus Notes Payable and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt ($51.8 for 2018 and $194.7 for 2017) All financial data set forth in this annual report relates solely to continuing operations unless otherwise indicated. 2018 Annual Report Dear Shareholders, As I begin my 30th year at Danaher, it is humbling to reflect on what our team has achieved over that time and exciting to think about the opportunities that still lie ahead. Financially and strategically, 2018 was an outstanding year. With the Danaher Business System (DBS) as our driving force, we strengthened our footholds in attractive, fast-growing markets and enhanced our competitive positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beckman Coulter Expanding Operations
    NEWS RELEASE Contacts: Hillary Hunter, Public Relations Phone: (561) 714-7826 E-mail: [email protected] Steve Ernst, Veris Communications Phone: (973) 702-7249 E-mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Expands Particle Characterization Group, Adds Hach Company’s Particle Counting Division Combined Businesses to Offer World-Class Expertise, Service and Solutions INDIANAPOLIS – October 21, 2013 – Beckman Coulter Life Sciences announces it is combining its Particle Characterization business with the Particle Counting business from Hach Company. This move brings together Beckman Coulter’s expertise in cell viability, particle sizing and particle analysis with Hach’s prominence in air and liquid particle counting, and will enable deeper particle characterization solutions, world-class customer support and superior service. In some countries the transition is subject to completing consultation and/or information with certain employee representative bodies. “This is an exciting time in the histories of these two storied enterprises,” said Jennifer Honeycutt, president, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences. “The Coulter, MET ONE and HIAC™ brands helped found the particle counting and characterization industry. Bringing them together allows us to continue to build on the success of these businesses and bring tremendous value to our customers.” Personnel from the particle counting business of Hach will transition into the Beckman Coulter Life Sciences business to work alongside the Particle Characterization team. Combing these two leading, Danaher Corporation-owned life science companies redefines the Beckman Coulter Particle Characterization business and uniquely positions it to provide innovative technologies to a number of important markets. For more information, please visit www.particle.com.
    [Show full text]