DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2015-2016 CONTENTS The Department .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 The John Forrester Case ........................................................................................................................ 4 Congratulations ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Staff and Affiliates .................................................................................................................................. 8 Visitors and Students ........................................................................................................................... 10 Comings and Goings ............................................................................................................................ 13 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................... 15 Prizes, Projects and Honours ............................................................................................................. 18 Seminars and Special Lectures ............................................................................................................ 19 Students ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Student Statistics ................................................................................................................................... 21 Part II Essay and Dissertation Titles ................................................................................................. 22 MPhil and Part III Essay and Dissertation Titles ............................................................................ 28 PhD Theses ........................................................................................................................................... 41 The Library ................................................................................................................................................. 44 The Museum .............................................................................................................................................. 54 Individual Reports ..................................................................................................................................... 81 Seminar Programmes .............................................................................................................................. 126 Michaelmas Term 2015 ...................................................................................................................... 126 Lent Term 2016 .................................................................................................................................. 141 Easter Term 2016 ............................................................................................................................... 159 Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RH Telephone: 01223 334500 Fax: 01223 334554 www.hps.cam.ac.uk 1 THE DEPARTMENT Introduction The Department of History and Philosophy’s annual report is a review of the 2015-16 academic year and a celebration of the staff and students that make the HPS department a world-class institution. We would like to thank our exceptional students and talented staff for all of their hard work this year to secure so many successes. We begin with hearty congratulations to Sachiko Kusukawa, a Fellow and Tutor in HPS at Trinity College who was promoted to Professor this year, and who gave her inaugural lecture on Friday 24th June, 2016, with the title 'Worth a thousand words? Early modern scientific images' at the Peterhouse Lecture Theatre. We also take this opportunity to extend our gratitude for her years of work with the Department and particularly her attention to our undergraduate students, many of whom have been fortunate to be supervised in history of science by Professor Kusukawa. Professor Sachiko Kusukawa Several members of the Department also had a successful year, in particular Simon Schaffer, Hasok Chang and Jim Secord who all received prestigious awards recognising their excellence in History and Philosophy of Science. More information, as well as the rest of the long list of congratulations for the year, can be found on page 6. Praise was given to everyone involved in our teaching and learning review, which takes place every six years. It concluded by saying that our teaching staff had delighted students and that the quality of our teaching and learning was fantastic. Thank you to everybody who took part in this important review, and to all those whose hard work is responsible for the Department's amazing reputation in this area. We welcomed several new members of staff this year, among them Dániel Margócsy as University Lecturer in Science, Technology and Medicine before 1800 and Jacob Stegenga as University Lecturer in Philosophy of Life Sciences. We also said goodbye to some of our staff as they continue on in their careers; we wish them every success. In-progress renovations on Rooms 20, 21, and 22 2 This academic year also saw the refurbishment of our top floor offices, where we divided two rooms in to three in order to make more space for our expanding academic community. The project is now complete and three of our University Teaching Officers are now based in the new rooms. Thanks to everyone who put up with the disruption caused by having a building site in the department! The Library has, as ever, had a very busy year, and their full report begins on page 44. The Whipple Museum's report also makes for informative reading on page 54. Sadly this year has also seen the passing of several members and friends of the Department. In November 2015, Professor John Forrester, foremost historian of Freud and psychoanalysis who was Head of the Department between 2007 and 2013, passed away. His life and work were commemorated by a day of talks and remembrance on Wednesday 16th May, appropriately titled ‘The John Forrester Case’, details of which are on pages 4 and 5. In April, we were saddened to learn of the death of Anita McConnell, an affiliated scholar in the Department who worked closely with the Whipple Museum. Lastly, in June, one of our John Forrester HPS alumni, Alison Winter, also passed away. On a happier note, we must mention that 2016 was a special birthday year for our Departmental Administrator, Tamara Hug. It was good to have a chance to celebrate after what had been a difficult start to the year. We end with thanks to everyone as they work hard to deliver the outstanding achievements demonstrated in this annual report. We conclude by paying tribute to the endeavour of all who play their part in our progress and we look forward to even greater success in the year to come Tamara Hug and Clare Matthews March 2017 3 The John Forrester Case Wednesday 18th May 2016 On Wednesday 18th May 2016, The Department of History and Philosophy of Science, together with John Forrester's family, held a day of talks in honour of the memory of Professor John Forrester, who sadly died in November 2015. Programme Chaired by Simon Schaffer and Liba Taub Talks take place in the McCrum Lecture Theatre, Bene’t Street 9.15 Arrival: Coffee and tea will be served in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science 9.45 Welcome: Liba Taub and Simon Schaffer 10.15 Boris Jardine: The master of the marginal annotation 10.25 Bonnie Evans: John’s insight and ability to raise new questions 10.40 Alexandra Bacopoulos-Viau: John Forrester, Doktorvater 10.50 Emm Johnstone: The supervisor as psychoanalyst 10.55 Leon Rocha: What does it have to do with my penis? 11.10 Break 11.30 Richard Ashcroft 11.45 Amanda Rees: John as a supervisor and rugby fan 12.00 Julia Borossa: John’s vision of psychoanalysis and his gift as a supervisor 12.15 Katherine Angel 12.25 Matt Drage: “Follow the money!” John’s supervision as libidinal cathexis 12.45 Buffet lunch in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science 14.00 Andreas Mayer: Thinking in cases and its ramifications for HPS 14.40 Michael Molnar: Emails and the origins of psychoanalysis 15.00 Laura Cameron: On generosity 15.15 Jim Secord 15.20 Nick Hopwood and colleagues: Generation to Reproduction 15.40 Rich McKay: Tiree Love Song 15.45 Final words 16.15 Memorial and afternoon tea in King’s College Hall 17.45 Drinks reception in the Whipple Museum 20.00 Finish 4 Memorial King’s College Hall at 16.15 Sam Yetman Schubert: Sonata in B flat major, D. 960, second movement Professor Simon Goldhill (University of Cambridge) Professor Liba Taub (University of Cambridge) Ian Patterson (University of Cambridge) Professor Maud Elman (University of Chicago) Professor Peter de Bolla (University of Cambridge) Professor Sherry Turkle (MIT) Professor Daniel Pick (Birkbeck, University of London) Professor Michael Ignatieff (Harvard University) Lisa Appignanesi Kryszia Osostowicz Bach: Sarabande in D from Partita no 2 Largo in F major from Sonata no 3 Followed by a drinks reception in the Main Gallery of the Whipple Museum from 17.45. 5 Congratulations The 2015-16 acaedemic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of a Comprehensive Public Engagement Training and Support Program on Scientists’ Outreach Attitudes and Practices
    International Journal of Science Education, Part B Communication and Public Engagement ISSN: 2154-8455 (Print) 2154-8463 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsed20 Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices Cathlyn Stylinski, Martin Storksdieck, Nicolette Canzoneri, Eve Klein & Anna Johnson To cite this article: Cathlyn Stylinski, Martin Storksdieck, Nicolette Canzoneri, Eve Klein & Anna Johnson (2018): Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2018.1506188 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1506188 Published online: 31 Aug 2018. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rsed20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, PART B https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1506188 Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices Cathlyn Stylinski a, Martin Storksdieck b, Nicolette Canzonerib, Eve Kleinc and Anna Johnson c aUMCES, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Appalachian Laboratory, Frostburg, MD, USA; bCenter for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; cInstitute for Learning Innovation, Seattle, WA, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Scientists are increasingly being called upon to play a more prominent role Received 1 November 2017 in the interface of science and society by contributing to science literacy in Accepted 24 July 2018 ways that support two-way exchanges with the public.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INDY STEM TEACHER RESIDENCY PROGRAM: a Teacher Quality Partnership Between Indianapolis Public Schools and Purdue University
    Table of Contents QUALITY OF THE PROJECT DESIGN 1-29 1.Extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a rationale 3-7 (a) Needs Assessment data 4-6 AppC (b) Project will prepare teachers with strong teaching skills 1-29 2.Goals, objectives, and outcomes are clearly specified and measurable 42-44 3.Project is designed to build capacity / yield results that extend beyond project period 29 4.Project represents exceptional approach for meeting statutory purposes/requirements 1-29 (c) Program will prepare teachers to understand/use research data to improve instruction 1-29 (f5i) Program aligns with state early learning standards… 1-29 ADEQUACY OF RESOURCES 29-33 1. Adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources 29-33 (e1) Assessment describing resources, including integration of funds from other sources 29-33 (e2) Assessment that describes the intended use of the grant funds 33 2. Relevance/demonstrated commitment of partners to project implementation/success 33 (e3) Commitment of resources and to the continuation of activities when the grant ends 29-33 QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT PLAN 33-41 1. Adequacy of management plan to achieve objectives on time/within budget, 33-39, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for AppJ accomplishing tasks (d1) Coordination of strategies/activities with funded teacher preparation or PD prog 13 (d2) How activities are consistent with State, local, and other education reform activities 8, 18- 19,21- that promote teacher quality and student academic
    [Show full text]
  • Realism for Realistic People
    Realism for Realistic People Author(s): Hasok Chang Source: Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9, No. 1 (2018) 31-34. Published by: The University of Toronto DOI: 10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27002 EDITORIALOFFICES Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Room 316 Victoria College, 91 Charles Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1K7 [email protected] Published online at jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations ISSN 1913 0465 Founded in 2006, Spontaneous Generations is an online academic journal published by graduate students at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto. There is no subscription or membership fee. Spontaneous Generations provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Focused Discussion Invited Paper Realism for Realistic People* Hasok Chang† Why should anyone care about the seemingly interminable philosophical debate concerning scientific realism? Shouldn’t we simply let go of it,in the spirit of Arthur Fine’s “natural ontological attitude” (NOA) (Fine 1986, chs. 7-8)? To a large extent I follow Fine, especially in relation to the endless arguments surrounding realist attempts to show that the impossible is somehow possible, that empirical science can really attain assured knowledge about what goes beyond experience. It is time to face the fact that we cannot know whether we have got the objective Truth about the World (even if such a formulation is meaningful). Realists go astray by persisting in trying to find a way around this fact, as do anti-realists in engaging with that obsession.
    [Show full text]
  • John Andrew Higgins
    John Andrew Higgins Assistant Professor Princeton University Tel: 609-258-7024 Department of Geosciences Fax: 609-258-5275 212 Guyot Hall Email: [email protected] Princeton, NJ, 08544 Web: carboncycle.princeton.edu Education: 2003-2009 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Ph.D. in Earth and Planetary Sciences, June 2009 Dissertation Supervisor: Daniel P. Schrag 2002-2003 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK M.Phil. in Earth Science, August 2003 Dissertation Supervisor: Harry Elderfield 1998-2002 Harvard College, Cambridge, MA A.B. in Earth and Planetary Sciences (Summa Cum Laude), June 2002 Employment: 2018-present Associate Professor, Department of Geosciences, Princeton University 2012-2018 Assistant Professor, Department of Geosciences, Princeton University 2011-2012 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIfAR) Junior Fellow 2009-2011 Hess Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Geosciences, Princeton University 2003-2009 Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University Fellowships and Awards: 2011-2013 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIfAR) Global Scholars Program 2009-2011 Hess Postdoctoral Fellow, Princeton University 2007-2009 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 2004-2007 National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship 2002-2003 Henry Fellowship to the University of Cambridge 2002 Phi Beta Kappa, Harvard College Research Interests: Interactions between Earth's climate, life, and the global geochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen on timescales of millennia to billions of years using measurements of the chemistry and isotopic composition of cations in sedimentary rocks and bubbles of trapped air in polar ice cores. Higgins - CV 1 Publications: *Lab -affiliated graduate student or postdoctoral fellow **First author or co-first author manuscripts In Review: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Perspectivism
    This impressive collection is essential reading for appreciating the inevi- table contextualities of scientific knowledge. It explores how notions of “perspective” can illuminate the epistemic upshot of the sciences and how they are situated in their history, practices, representations, and sometimes competing aims, provocatively advancing debates about realism, pragma- tism, explanation, and modeling in the process, all through a wealth of cases from physics, biology, neuroscience, and medical science . —Anjan Chakravartty, University of Miami An excellent collection of essays on a topic rapidly establishing itself as an important interpretive programme in philosophy of science. One of the volume’s many merits consists in showing the diversity and versatil- ity of perspectivism while illustrating common features among its differ- ent varieties. The reader is thus provided an enormously rich foundation for evaluating the role of perspectivism in understanding science and its practices . —Margaret Morrison, University of Toronto Perspectivism is a fruitful metaphor for imagining alternatives to tradi- tional realism in philosophy of science. Massimi and McCoy have gath- ered ten essays which show how perspectivism is illuminating in areas such as molecular biology and measurement theory, and also explore the relationships between perspectivism and other recent accounts including pragmatism, structural realism, pluralism, and scientific modelling. There is an excellent balance of established and emerging scholars in the field. This volume is a superb, cutting-edge text to use in an advanced graduate seminar . —Miriam Solomon, Temple University Understanding Perspectivism This edited collection is the first of its kind to explore the view called perspectivism in the philosophy of science. The book brings together an array of essays that reflect on the methodological promises and scientific challenges of perspectivism in a variety of fields such as physics, biology, cognitive neuroscience, and cancer research, just for a few examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia a Into Virtual Reality
    Walking Through an Exploded Star: Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A into Virtual Reality 1 2 1 1 2 1 Arcand, K.K. , Jiang, E. , Price, S. , Watzke, M. , Sgouros, T. , Edmonds, P. 1 2 ( Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory/Chandra X-ray Observatory, Brown University) ABSTRACT: NASA and other astrophysical data of the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant have been rendered into a three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) program, the first of its kind. This data-driven experience of a supernova remnant allows viewers to “walk” inside the leftovers from the explosion of a massive star, select the parts of the supernova remnant to engage with, and access descriptive texts on what the materials are. The basis of this program is a unique 3D model of the 340- year old remains of a stellar explosion, made by combining data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, Spitzer Space Telescope, and ground-based facilities. A collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Brown University allowed the 3D astronomical data collected on Cassiopeia A to be featured in the VR/AR program - an innovation in digital technologies with public, education, and research-based impacts. Key Words: data, virtual reality, science communication, visualization, augmented reality, narrative 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview of Virtual Reality (VR) Virtual Reality (VR) is computer technology that simulates a user's physical presence in a virtual environment. (VR’s close relative, Augmented Reality (AR), adds elements, such as text, overlays and audio, to enhance that experience with sensory input and is briefly discussed in section 1.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Annenberg Science Media Monitor – Report 3
    ANNENBERG SCIENCE MEDIA MONITOR – REPORT 3 How the Media Frame News Stories About Retractions of Scientific Findings Introduction The third report of the Annenberg Science Media Monitor focuses on news coverage of three high- profile retracted scientific findings. Our analysis examines reporting on withdrawn research by four authors: Miguel Ángel Martínez González, whose paper, “Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet,” was published in February 2013 in The New England Journal of Medicine; Oona Lönnstedt and Peter Eklöv, whose paper, “Environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic particles influence larval fish ecology,” was published in June 2016 in Science; Brian Wansink, who has had a number of papers on human eating behavior retracted, including “Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste,” published in September 2005 in The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. News pieces about retractions treat those due to unintended error differently than those withdrawn for malfeasance or fraud. Here we examine one of the former and two of the latter. Reports on the Lönnstedt-Eklöv study and on Wansink’s withdrawn work adopted the counterfeit quest narrative, while coverage of the Mediterranean diet attributed the retractions to researcher error rather than intentional deception. Articles covering retractions often employ the counterfeit quest narrative, in which storylines chronicle the activities of a deceptive researcher who has gulled custodians of knowledge, such as journal editors and peer reviewers. Our analysis shows that, in general, counterfeit quest narratives report the circumstances leading to retractions, how errors or misconduct were uncovered, and the individuals who identified the issues, but fail to explain how retractions are evidence of the self-corrective norm of science in action.
    [Show full text]
  • Hasok Chang Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo 1 Operational Coherence as the Source of Truth1 (version for publication, 14 February 2017) Hasok Chang Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge Abstract In this paper I seek to defend an epistemology that does not confine itself to the knowledge of propositions. The first section motivates this move, especially from the standpoint of the philosophy of science. The second section presents the notion of operational coherence as the key to understanding how knowledge resides in activities. The third section presents a proposal for making sense of truth on the basis of operational coherence. The final section briefly re- considers the relation between knowledge-as-ability and knowledge-as- information. 1. Knowledge beyond propositions The overall direction of this paper is to move beyond the propositional conception of knowledge. What I mean by that phrase is the widespread notion that knowledge (or at least the kind of knowledge that deserves the attention of epistemologists) consists in possessing the right sort of belief in the right sort of propositions.2 Without denying the importance of propositional knowledge, I want to pay attention to other aspects of what we commonly call knowledge, which cannot comfortably be fitted into a propositional framework. I will not pretend that the move I am making is a novel one, especially in this journal. 1 I would like to thank various members of the audience at the Aristotelian Society meeting of 9 January 2017 for helpful objections and suggestions, as well as encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Biology Education Research
    Challenges in Biology Education Research Challenges in Biology Education Research – Challenges in Biology This volume consists of 24 original papers related to biology education research. The papers were first presented at the 11th Conference of Eu- ropean Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB) organized by the Education Research Academic Committee of ERIDOB and the Centre of Science, Mathema- tics and Engineering Education Research (SMEER) at Karlstad University in Sweden. The conference took place on 5-9 September 2016 with 165 Edited by Niklas Gericke and Marcus Grace participants representing 24 countries. There were 77 oral presentations, including four symposia, and 52 poster presentations. After the conference the presenters were asked to send in extended papers, which all then went through a rigorous peer review process and these 24 were selected for this volume. They are presented in section one. The theme for the 11th ERIDOB conference was Challenges of Biology Education Research – the same as the title of this book of collected pa- pers, and a panel debate around this issue was arranged with William Niklas Gericke and Marcus Grace McComas as organizer. Included in the debate were contributions from seven scholars in the field of biology education research representing se- ven countries from four continents. In section two of this volume, we in- clude the peer-reviewed versions of these short papers as a joint article commenting on the current challenges, trajectories and opportunities for biology education. We hope that this volume will find its way to biology educators as well as biology education researchers and make a useful contribution to the deve- lopment of biology education in Europe and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatic Realism†
    Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso Año 4 / 2016 / 2do semestre / N° 8 Págs. 107 - 122 ISSN 0719-4234 / eISSN 0719-4242 Pragmatic Realism† Hasok Chang* Abstract In this paper I seek to articulate and develop Roberto Torretti’s advocacy of pragmatic realism. At the core of Torrietti’s view is a rejection of the notion that the truth of scientific theories consists in their correspondence to the world. I propose to understand correspondence in that sense as a metaphorical notion. I articulate a notion of pragmatist coherence, on the basis of which I make new coherence theories of truth and reality. Then it becomes possible to say that pragmatic realism consists in the pursuit of true knowledge of reality, in a way that is also consonant with Torretti’s pluralism. Keywords: pragmatism, realism, pluralism, coherence, truth, reality Realismo Pragmático Resumen En este trabajo intento articular y desarrollar la defensa que Roberto Torretti hace del realismo pragmático. En el núcleo de la visión de Torretti existe un rechazo a la idea de que la verdad de las teorías científicas consista en su correspondencia con el mundo. Propongo entonces entender la correspondencia como una noción metafórica. Articularé una noción de coherencia pragmática sobre la cual establezco una nueva teoría de la coherencia entre verdad y realidad. __________________En consecuencia, resultará posible afirmar que el realismo pragmático † Recibido: octubre 2016. This paper is partly based on a presentation entitled “Pragmatist Coherence as the Source of Truth and Reality,” given at the sixth biennial conference of the Society for Philosophy of Science in Practice (SPSP) on 17 June 2016 at Rowan University.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrealistic Science and the Reception of Narrative Fiction
    Screaming When There is Sound in Space: Unrealistic Science and the Reception of Narrative Fiction A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University By Jarrod L. Green © Copyright by Jarrod Leigh Green 2017 All rights reserved ii Declaration This thesis is my original work completed between March 2013 and December 2016. I personally completed all of the data collection, transcription, analysis, and writing described herein. To the best of my knowledge, this thesis contains no material previously published elsewhere, except where acknowledgement is made in the text. No part of this thesis has been previously submitted for an educational qualification at any university. A preliminary version of Chapter 6 was presented as a paper titled, “Who screams when there’s sound in space? Why audiences discuss unrealistic science in fiction,” at the March 2016 Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association (PCA/ACA) National Conference, Seattle, Washington. I was the sole author and presenter. Jarrod L. Green June, 2017 iii iv When a work is acutely consonant with the facts which it adduces, it is praised for fidelity; when it lapses from its claims, the idea of infidelity is held to be farcically solemn and inadmissible. This is not criticism but public relations. Christopher Ricks, “Literature and the matter of fact,” 1996 v vi Acknowledgements My first thanks go to my research participants. This thesis is indebted to your contributions. To Dr Lindy Orthia, my research supervisor, you have been both a champion of my work and a discerning critic. Thank you for your ongoing support.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    1 GRANT FISHER Graduate School of Science and Technology Policy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea Tel: +82-42-350-4855 Mobile: +82-(0)10-2800-4303 Email: [email protected] Research interests. Philosophy of science, ethics and governance of emerging technologies, history and philosophy of chemistry. Education. October 1999- University of Leeds Ph.D. in Philosophy September 2003 Specialization: Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Chemistry Supervisor: Steven French October 1998- University of Leeds M.A. in History and Philosophy of Science September 1999 Pass with Distinction. September 1995- University College London B.Sc. (Honours) in History and Philosophy of Science, June 1998 University College London, 1998. Class I (First Class Honours). Academic appointments. August 2013-present Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Associate Professor, Graduate School of Science and Technology Policy. August 2010-August 2013 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Science; Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Science and Technology Policy. August 2008-August 2010 Boğaziçi University Lecturer in Humanities (fixed term) June 2005-July 2008 University College London Research Fellow in Philosophy of Science, Department of Science & Technology Studies. Worked on the research project “Evidence in the Natural Sciences” (Project Leader: Hasok Chang) as part of the UCL Research Programme: “Evidence, Inference and Enquiry: Towards an Integrated Science of Evidence”. (Principle Investigator: Philip Dawid). September 2004-May 2005 University of Leeds Temporary Lecturer in Philosophy of Science, Department of 2 Philosophy. October 2003-June 2004 Durham University Temporary Lecturer in History of Science, Department of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]