Get Active in the NORTH WEST 2019
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cradle Coast Natural Resource Management
CRADLE COASTNRMANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 22015015 22016016 ANNUAL REPORT MANAGEMENT NATURAL RESOURCE CRADLE COAST 1 Cradle Coast NRM Annual Report 2015-2016 Copyright © Cradle Coast Authority 2016 No part of this publication may be reproduced without the express prior permission of the publisher. Published by: Cradle Coast Authority PO Box 338 Burnie TAS 7320 Ph: 03 6433 8400 [email protected] www.cradlecoastnrm.com www.facebook.com/cradlecoastnrm This report is produced to fulfi l the statutory reporting obligations of the Cradle Coast NRM Committee under the Tasmanian Natural Resource Management Act 2002. The Committee is required to report on its activity to the Minister for Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. This report covers the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. The Cradle Coast NRM Committee acknowledges the fi nancial support provided to it by the Australian and Tasmanian Governments. CONTENTS 4 Foreword 7 Introduction 8-10 Cradle Coast NRM Staff and Committee 12 Executive Off icer Report 14 Cradle Coast NRM Strategy Summary Cradle Coast NRM 2015/2016 Program Overview Sustainable Environment 16-17 Restoring and Maintaining Urban Waterways and Coastal Environments 18-19 Conserving and Protecting Species and Eco-Systems 20-21 Community Skills, Knowledge and Engagement Sustainable Agriculture 25 Regional Landcare Facilitator 26-27 Productive Landscapes 28 Building Indigenous People’s Capacity in NRM 29-33 Cradle Coast NRM Financial Statements 34 Thank You CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 3 FOREWORD I present the Annual Report clear that there is a crucial role for on our committee and staff , whose for 2015/16 on behalf of the regional NRM in supporting the impact experience, knowledge and passion Cradle Coast Natural Resource assessment and recovery actions. -
Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5 -
State and Local Government Partnership Agreements
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS Report to Parliament November 2004 Including progress from November 2003 to October 2004 Premier Paul Lennon and Mayor Ross Hine sign the revised Circular Head Partnership Agreement. © P Hoysted 2004 Prepared by the Local Government Division of the Department of Premier and Cabinet State and Local Government Partnership Agreements November 2004 Executive Summary Welcome to the State and Local Government Partnership Agreements Report to Parliament 2004. The program is into its sixth year and the number of Agreements and positive outcomes continues to rise. This year has seen the signing of the first reviewed Agreement under the program. The Circular Head Agreement was originally signed in June 1999 and a renegotiated Agreement was signed in September this year. A number of other Councils have also agreed to review and renegotiate their Agreements, including Launceston City, Flinders, Glenorchy City, Kingborough and Northern Tasmania Development. The Partnership Agreements program has proven that it can deliver tangible outcomes to local communities. Progress in the last twelve months has included: • Up to $10 million in State Government levies on Local Government have been abolished under the new Financial Reform Partnership Agreement. • The Rivers Run Tourism Association has been established and has produced a touring map and guide for tourists in Central Highlands and Derwent Valley municipal areas. • The Circular Head Community and Recreation Centre was opened in August. The facility caters for a range of sports and includes function facilities. The State Government provided funding under the original Partnership Agreement and allocated a further $200,000 under the revised Agreement signed this year. -
GAZETTE Index 2018 July-December.Indd
THE TASMANIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE JULY TO DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME CCCXXXI Printed by Mercury Walch Pty Ltd 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018 2018 INDEX JULY TO DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME CCCXXXI AS far as is possible in this Index subject-matter is grouped under the Act which gave authority for, or the department or body which promulgated, the notice concerned. The reference ‘above’ or ‘below’ infers that the subject heading referred to is in close proximity to such reference, and not in any other alphabetical section. Municipal affairs are dealt with under ‘CITIES/COUNCILS’, but regard must be had as to whether the subject-matter is within the jurisdiction of the municipal body or is such as would be promulgated by an Act of Parliament or a Government Department acting under the provisions of an Act or Statutory Rule. With regard to notices originating from governmental bodies or local authorities, entries are made under the title of the body concerned. Gregory, 975, 998; Hall, 920; Handasyde, 1035; Hardy, A 750; Haros, 1036; Havu, 1046; Heese, 902; Hennicke, 956; Henri, 749; Henry, 1036; Hewitt, 1024; Heywood, Abandoned Lands, see under Lands 820; Hinsley, 749; Hodge, 975; Hodgetts, 634; Acts of Parliament—see Bills under Parliament Holloway, 872; Holmes, 820; Hutchins, 998; Johns, Acquisition of Land, see Land Acquisition Act under Lands 1046; Johnston, 919; Jones, 985, 1059; Keal, 1058; Keating, 819; King, 1024; Kingston, 872; Kirkland, Administration and Probate— 947; Kolenda, 807; Kulakauskas, 653; Larcombe, 654; Application to Seal or Reseal -
Aboriginal Society in North West Tasmania:Dispossession And
~boriginal Society in North West Tasmania: Dispossession and Genocide by Ian McFarlane B.A. (Hons) submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania October 2002 Statement of Authorship This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the _University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. 31 lf?~?.. Zoo-z.. Signed ...... /~ .. ~ .. 'f.-!~.. D at e ..............................t.,. .. Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. stgne. d............................................... J._ ~~-1-- . 19 March 2002 Abstract Aboriginal Society in North West Tasmania: Dispossession and Genocide As the title indicates this study is restricted to those Aboriginal tribes1 located in the North West region of Tasmania. This approach enables the regional character and diversity of Aboriginal communities to be brought into focus; it also facilitates an . ex:a.miJ,lation of the QJlique process of dispossession that took place in the North West region, an area totally under the control of the Van Diemen's Land Company (VDL Co). Issues dealing with entitlement to ownership and sovereignty will be established by an examination of t~e structure and function of traditional. Aboriginal Societies in the region, as well as the, occupation and use they made of their lands. -
Northwest Tasmania Groundwater
300000mE 350000mE 400000mE 450000mE MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA CAPE WICKHAM Tasmania Disappointment DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE Cape ENERGY and RESOURCES Farewell Bay 5600000mN NORTHWEST TASMANIA 5600000mN GROUNDWATER MAP PHOQUES Lavinia Pt BAY New Year Is Christmas Is PERCENT PERCENTAGE AVERAGE SALINITY PROSPECTIVITY NUMBER MAXIMUM IRRIGATION VULNERABILITY TO POLLUTION AQUIFER TYPE (Whole of Tasmania) ROCK GROUPS SUCCESSFUL YIELD (L/s) RANGE GENERAL AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS OF BORES YIELD (L/s) SUCCESSFUL (mg/L) (YIELD >0.03) # (YIELD >=1.5) Whistler Pt Quaternary aeolian deposits marginal to the coast 60 95 0.65 (11) 1.3 0 270 - 980 These aquifers are contained in surface sand deposits of limited thickness - usually up to a maximum thickness of 10-15 metres, but often much less. Yields depend on grain High. consisting of fine to medium grain size sand. POROUS size, clay content and the thickness of saturated material. Yields decrease with an increase in the clay content. Groundwater is usually extracted from these aquifers using spear (INTERGRANULAR) HIGH bores installed to a depth of 7-8 metres. A single spear in a prospective area may yield 0.75 L/s (e.g. Currie area) which would be sufficient for domestic, garden, and stock use. A nest of spear bores (10-20) using a central pump may yield irrigation or small town supplies (7-15 L/s). Significant extraction from these deposits takes place at Currie, where the town supply comes from dune sand, and at Stanley where the golf club installed a system to water the course. Other areas including Woolnorth, Stanley, Arthur River and Peggs Beach have proved to have potential for useful supplies. -
A Survey of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of the Tarkine Region, North-West Tasmania
Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 A survey of the freshwater fish fauna of the Tarkine region, north-west Tasmania 27 January – 6 February 2015 Submitted: 26 March 2015 Scott Hardie Page 1 of 29 Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Collection methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 General methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 8 2.3 Identifying the collections ......................................................................................... -
Economic Implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage Listing of the Tarkine Area
Potential Socio- economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Tasmanian Government submission to the Australian Government - Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities October 2011 Table of Contents Section Section Heading Page Number Number Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 1 North-West Region – Economic Data 5 2 Sovereign Risk and Uncertainty 12 3 Existing Mining Projects and Developments 12 4 Review of Adverse Impacts on Future Value Adding 19 Projects (Mining) 5 Potential for New Mineral Discovery in the Area 20 Under Assessment for National Heritage Listing 6 Current Regulation of Mineral Exploration and Mining 22 in Tasmania 7 Tourism Overview 23 8 Forestry 24 Conclusion 25 Attachment Comments from Local Government Authorities 27 1 2 Potential Socio-economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Executive Summary As outlined in the Tasmanian Government’s submission to the Australian Heritage Council on the Proposed National Heritage listing, the Tasmanian Government does not agree with the proposed National Heritage values and boundary listing of the area of North-West Tasmania referred to as the Tarkine. The Government has issues with the approach taken to identifying values within the proposed boundary. In addition, pursuant to section 324JJ (5)(b) of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999, the Government wishes to draw to the attention of the Minister that it believes serious immediate and long term social impacts should be taken into account which would occur in an already depressed region of Tasmania resulting from the closure of key industries such as mining and forestry. -
Central North Fire Management Area Fire Protection Plan
Central North Fire Management Area Fire Protection Plan 2017 Central North Fire Protection Plan 2017 1 Document Control Document History Version Date Author Section 1.0 19 October 2016 M Lorang Draft 2.0 21 December 2016 C Moore Final Central North Fire Management Area Committee Members Agency Name Devonport City Council Kylie Lunson Central Coast Council Tony King (Chair) Meander Valley Council Michael Kelly Kentish Council/Latrobe Council Gerald Monson Latrobe Council Jonathan Magor Tasmania Fire Service Phillip Harvey Tasmania Fire Service Neville Bingham TasNetworks Michael Philpott TasNetworks David Inglis Hydro Tasmania Craig Emmett Tas Parks & Wildlife Eddie Staier Tas Water Louise McConachie Forestry Tasmania Bob Knox Forestry Tasmania Peter Rowlands Tasmania Farmers and Graziers Andrew Craigie SES Wayne Richards Document Endorsement FMAC Chair – Tony King Date: 21/12/2016 Accepted by State Fire Management Council SFMC Chair – Ian Sauer Date: 16 February 2017 Central North Fire Protection Plan 2017 2 Table of Contents Document Control ............................................................................................................ 2 Document History ......................................................................................................... 2 Central North Fire Management Area Committee Members ......................................... 2 Document Endorsement ............................................................................................... 2 Glossary ......................................................................................................................... -
Extinction of the Thylacine
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.427214; this version posted January 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Main Manuscript title: Extinction of the Thylacine. 2 3 Authors: Barry W. Brook1,2*, Stephen R. Sleightholme3, Cameron R. Campbell4, Ivan Jarić5,6 4 and Jessie C. Buettel1,2. 5 6 Affiliations: 7 1 School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Australia. 8 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH). 9 3 Project Director - International Thylacine Specimen Database (ITSD), 26 Bitham Mill, 10 Westbury, BA13 3DJ, UK. 11 4 Curator of the online Thylacine Museum: http://www.naturalworlds.org/thylacine/ 8707 Eagle 12 Mountain Circle, Fort Worth, TX 76135, USA. 13 5 Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České 14 Budějovice, Czech Republic. 15 6 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecosystem Biology, České 16 Budějovice, Czech Republic. 17 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 18 19 Author Contributions: B.W.B., S.R.S., C.R.C. and J.C.B. conceived the project and developed 20 the database, B.W.B. performed the data analysis and wrote the paper, B.W.B., I.J. and J.C.B. 21 created the display items. All authors discussed the draft structure, results, and interpretation, and 22 commented on the manuscript. -
Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 1
2017/18 Annual Report Kentish Council Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 1 Kentish Council PO Box 63 (69 High Street) SHEFFIELD TAS 7306 P: 6491 0200 F: 6491 1659 E: [email protected] W: www.kentish.tas.gov.au Front Cover: Kelly Slater Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 2 WELCOME CONTENTS THE YEAR IN REVIEW 4 The Kentish Council proudly presents the Mayor & General Manager’s Welcome 5 2017/18 Annual Report to the Community. Performance at a Glance 6 Kentish Profile 7 The Annual Report highlights Council’s A Year in Kentish 8 performance against the 2017/18 Annual Plan Activity Overview 9 and Budget. Financial Overview 14 OUR PERFORMANCE 23 The Annual Plan and Budget sets out 18 strategic Infrastructure 25 objectives grouped under four categories: Economic & Community Development 34 1. Infrastructure; Governance & Organisational Development 40 2. Economic and Community Development; Planning & Development 48 3. Governance and Organisational Development; and GOVERNANCE 54 4. Planning and Development Corporate Governance 55 against which Council’s performance is measured. Our Councillors 61 Our Organisation 65 Section 72 of the Local Government Act 1993 Our Staff 67 requires all councils to prepare an Annual Report Our Volunteers 69 including prescribed content. Workplace Health & Safety 70 Legislative Reporting 71 As well as meeting this statutory requirement, General Reporting 77 Council sees the Annual Report as a great opportunity to keep residents and stakeholders FINANCIAL REPORT 79 informed about its performance and future direction. The report demonstrates the breadth of Council’s operations and identifies achievements and challenges during the 2017/18 financial year. -
Response To, and Lessons Learnt From, Recent Bushfires in Remote Tasmanian Wilderness
Submission to the Senate Inquiry: Response to, and lessons learnt from, recent bushfires in remote Tasmanian wilderness. Summary This submission addresses “part f) any related matter”, as it refers to events occurring outside the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nevertheless, it is the opinion of the author that these events deserve scrutiny in that the bushfires occurring in a wilderness area (ie the Tarkine) as a result of climate change impacts, bore direct adverse impacts on public health, animal welfare and regional economics for a prolonged period due to inadequate planning and resourcing of fire fighting services. This occurred despite recent recommendations in the 2013 Tasmanian Bushfires Inquiry advising early and comprehensive intervention in remote fires. These are dealt with in Part 1. Additionally, the Tarkine area has been identified as having World Heritage Values and campaigns continue to have this area recognized as a National Park. There was significant impact on this landscape in the recent fire events resulting from global warming climate and weather outcomes, and delayed fire fighting response due to lack of resources despite recommendations made repeatedly in previous years. This is addressed in Part 2. Several aspects of this Northwest fire event are pertinent to the other terms of reference listed. This submission seeks to examine the events in detail: the timing, resources, coordination and limitations of the emergency response, the fire behavior & its predictability, wilderness and industry environmental factors precipitating the event, the relevant local impacts of global warming, and make some recommendations to direct future emergency response to wilderness fires posing significant risk to adjacent communities and globally significant natural values.