DOCSLIB.ORG

Cradle Coast Natural Resource Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cradle Coast Natural Resource Management CRADLE COASTNRMANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 22015015 22016016 ANNUAL REPORT MANAGEMENT NATURAL RESOURCE CRADLE COAST 1 Cradle Coast NRM Annual Report 2015-2016 Copyright © Cradle Coast Authority 2016 No part of this publication may be reproduced without the express prior permission of the publisher. Published by: Cradle Coast Authority PO Box 338 Burnie TAS 7320 Ph: 03 6433 8400 [email protected] www.cradlecoastnrm.com www.facebook.com/cradlecoastnrm This report is produced to fulfi l the statutory reporting obligations of the Cradle Coast NRM Committee under the Tasmanian Natural Resource Management Act 2002. The Committee is required to report on its activity to the Minister for Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. This report covers the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. The Cradle Coast NRM Committee acknowledges the fi nancial support provided to it by the Australian and Tasmanian Governments. CONTENTS 4 Foreword 7 Introduction 8-10 Cradle Coast NRM Staff and Committee 12 Executive Off icer Report 14 Cradle Coast NRM Strategy Summary Cradle Coast NRM 2015/2016 Program Overview Sustainable Environment 16-17 Restoring and Maintaining Urban Waterways and Coastal Environments 18-19 Conserving and Protecting Species and Eco-Systems 20-21 Community Skills, Knowledge and Engagement Sustainable Agriculture 25 Regional Landcare Facilitator 26-27 Productive Landscapes 28 Building Indigenous People’s Capacity in NRM 29-33 Cradle Coast NRM Financial Statements 34 Thank You CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 3 FOREWORD I present the Annual Report clear that there is a crucial role for on our committee and staff , whose for 2015/16 on behalf of the regional NRM in supporting the impact experience, knowledge and passion Cradle Coast Natural Resource assessment and recovery actions. contributed so much to this region. Management Committee. While optimistic about our future, As we look to the future, I would A key task this year was to review the it is clear that the recovery from like to acknowledge the signifi cant Cradle Coast Regional NRM Strategy, recent events will take time. contribution of Committee members which was completed in 2015 and We are committed to working with Tina Alderson, Shane Broad, formally accredited in early 2016. We our regional community in the Sue Jennings and Bill Walker, who left developed the revised document recovery process. It is also important us in this period. I would particularly in response to feedback from our that we work on creating a more like to thank Bill for his support community and stakeholders. resilient region to ensure that we as Deputy Chair and Sue for her This Strategy will provide valuable are better prepared to deal with incredible passion and dedication guidance for strategic decisions and any future events. We refl ect this in to NRM. I am pleased to welcome investment in our region through the our commitment to supporting our Gemma Lewis to our Committee next fi ve years, at a time when we are farmers in sustainable agriculture, in this period and extend a warm recovering from a range of natural our schools education program and welcome to our new members who disasters and challenges. community participation in a diversity will be joining us later in 2016. of environmental activities. The 2015/16 year has been one of The task ahead for the NRM our most challenging, particularly for This Report is my last as Chair of the Committee will be challenging, but our region’s primary producers and Cradle Coast NRM Committee, and with the support of capable and dedicated staff , I am confi dent that the environment. With record dry I would like to acknowledge and we will deliver the best possible spells, devastating fi res then fl oods, refl ect on the incredible journey NRM outcomes for the region. compounded by diff icult economic and the Region has undertaken over conditions, notably in the dairy the last 15 years. At the beginning in On behalf of the Committee I would industry, and emerging biosecurity 2001/02 a combination of interest like to express our gratitude to the threats including Myrtle and Blueberry and fear of the unknown packed community of this region, who in Rust, the need to work together across initial public consultation meetings partnership with our Committee government, industry and community to capacity. Our Committee operated and staff continue to support and is clear. with 15 representative members, and participate in NRM activities in our our discussions and debate were region, regardless of the adversities Cradle Coast NRM will continue to robust and informative, setting the and challenges we face. Thank you. play its part and evolve to meet culture of an open and respectful the regions’ needs, both current environment which was also Rick Rockliff and future. Recent events have challenging and productive. Committee Chairman highlighted the importance of our regional capacity and networks. It is gratifying to look back and The capacity to communicate and realise how far we have come in disseminate critical information on this time, to our acceptance today biosecurity threats and our ability as an integral part of the regional to respond swift ly to support State community which operates eff ectively agencies and others in fi re and fl ood in partnership with government, events has also been notable. industry and community. It is a credit With fewer resources and more to the many exceptional people centralised services, it has become I have been privileged to work with Opposite photo: Mark Wisniewski 4 CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 5 6 CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 INTRODUCTION Cradle Coast NRM work with North In 2000, these nine local government West Tasmanian communities municipalities established a regional and industry to manage natural organisation known as the Cradle Currie Naracoopa resources, such as land, water and Coast Authority to provide a regional coasts, to ensure a sustainable voice for North West Tasmania. Grassy future for the region. The Cradle Coast NRM Committee is an independent committee hosted by Cradle Coast NRM supports the Cradle Coast Authority. community and industry projects, facilitates funding, and coordinates The Cradle Coast NRM Annual Stanley natural resource activities and Report for 2015/16 outlines the Smithton Wynyard information sharing. The Cradle achievements of natural resource Marrawah Burnie Coast region’s natural resources and management activities within the UlverstoneDevonport landscapes sustain primary industries; Cradle Coast region. provide clean water, air and homes for a diverse range of animal and Additional copies of this report can be Waratah plant communities. found at www.cradlecoastnrm.com Cradle Valley The Cradle Coast region is bounded For information on the objectives by 2640km of coastline and covers and strategic direction of natural Zeehan approximately one-third of Tasmania. resource management in the Cradle Queenstown The region stretches from Narawntapu Coast, refer to the 2015-2020 Cradle Strahan National Park in the East to King Coast Regional Natural Resource Island and Cape Grim in the far North Management Strategy also available West and to Port Davey in the South. from www.cradlecoastnrm.com The region incorporates the nine local government municipalities of Burnie City, Central Coast, Circular Head, Devonport City, Kentish, King Island, Latrobe, Waratah-Wynyard and West Coast. Opposite photo: Geoff Gleave CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 7 STAFF Cradle Coast NRM staff have expertise in agriculture, water, coastal and biodiversity management, monitoring and mapping, and community engagement. They identify regional natural resource management priorities, prepare regional strategies, promotes NRM principles and support the Brett Smith – Richard Ingram – Grant Pearce – implementation of Chief Executive Off icer Executive Off icer Operations Manager NRM activities. Is responsible for leading Leads the team and is the Networks with stakeholder Cradle Coast NRM is a the Cradle Coast Authority’s link between the Cradle groups, project business unit based within services and functions Coast NRM Committee, management, and positions the Cradle Coast Authority. including Cradle Coast NRM. Cradle Coast Authority and Cradle Coast NRM to The Authority is responsible industry stakeholders. support the direction of for providing services relevant sciences. including economic development, tourism and natural resource management across the North West Region of Tasmania. This information refl ects the team composition at 30 June 2016. Ernst Kemmerer – Tom O’Malley – Anna Wind – Strategy and Regional Landcare Coordinator: Coastal Implementation Manager Facilitator Heads the Coastal, Develops strategies and Facilitates community Estuarine and Marine programs that better align access to skills and and Community State and Commonwealth knowledge related Skills, Knowledge and funding with community to sustainable land Engagement programs aspirations management practices 8 CRADLE COAST NRM ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 Will Hogg – Spencer Gibbs – Sherrie Jaff ray – Dionna Newton – Coordinator: Biodiversity Coordinator: Productive Project Off icer: Project Off icer: Coastal, Landscapes Community Education Estuarine & Marine Heads projects to protect healthy ecosystems by Leads the Sustainable Works with school groups Facilitates Coastal, monitoring threatened Agriculture program, and youth organisations Estuarine and Marine fl ora and fauna species, facilitating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Society in North West Tasmania:Dispossession And
    ~boriginal Society in North West Tasmania: Dispossession and Genocide by Ian McFarlane B.A. (Hons) submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania October 2002 Statement of Authorship This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the _University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. 31 lf?~?.. Zoo-z.. Signed ...... /~ .. ~ .. 'f.-!~.. D at e ..............................t.,. .. Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. stgne. d............................................... J._ ~~-1-- . 19 March 2002 Abstract Aboriginal Society in North West Tasmania: Dispossession and Genocide As the title indicates this study is restricted to those Aboriginal tribes1 located in the North West region of Tasmania. This approach enables the regional character and diversity of Aboriginal communities to be brought into focus; it also facilitates an . ex:a.miJ,lation of the QJlique process of dispossession that took place in the North West region, an area totally under the control of the Van Diemen's Land Company (VDL Co). Issues dealing with entitlement to ownership and sovereignty will be established by an examination of t~e structure and function of traditional. Aboriginal Societies in the region, as well as the, occupation and use they made of their lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Tasmania Groundwater
    300000mE 350000mE 400000mE 450000mE MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA CAPE WICKHAM Tasmania Disappointment DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE Cape ENERGY and RESOURCES Farewell Bay 5600000mN NORTHWEST TASMANIA 5600000mN GROUNDWATER MAP PHOQUES Lavinia Pt BAY New Year Is Christmas Is PERCENT PERCENTAGE AVERAGE SALINITY PROSPECTIVITY NUMBER MAXIMUM IRRIGATION VULNERABILITY TO POLLUTION AQUIFER TYPE (Whole of Tasmania) ROCK GROUPS SUCCESSFUL YIELD (L/s) RANGE GENERAL AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS OF BORES YIELD (L/s) SUCCESSFUL (mg/L) (YIELD >0.03) # (YIELD >=1.5) Whistler Pt Quaternary aeolian deposits marginal to the coast 60 95 0.65 (11) 1.3 0 270 - 980 These aquifers are contained in surface sand deposits of limited thickness - usually up to a maximum thickness of 10-15 metres, but often much less. Yields depend on grain High. consisting of fine to medium grain size sand. POROUS size, clay content and the thickness of saturated material. Yields decrease with an increase in the clay content. Groundwater is usually extracted from these aquifers using spear (INTERGRANULAR) HIGH bores installed to a depth of 7-8 metres. A single spear in a prospective area may yield 0.75 L/s (e.g. Currie area) which would be sufficient for domestic, garden, and stock use. A nest of spear bores (10-20) using a central pump may yield irrigation or small town supplies (7-15 L/s). Significant extraction from these deposits takes place at Currie, where the town supply comes from dune sand, and at Stanley where the golf club installed a system to water the course. Other areas including Woolnorth, Stanley, Arthur River and Peggs Beach have proved to have potential for useful supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of the Tarkine Region, North-West Tasmania
    Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 A survey of the freshwater fish fauna of the Tarkine region, north-west Tasmania 27 January – 6 February 2015 Submitted: 26 March 2015 Scott Hardie Page 1 of 29 Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Collection methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 General methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 8 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage Listing of the Tarkine Area
    Potential Socio- economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Tasmanian Government submission to the Australian Government - Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities October 2011 Table of Contents Section Section Heading Page Number Number Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 1 North-West Region – Economic Data 5 2 Sovereign Risk and Uncertainty 12 3 Existing Mining Projects and Developments 12 4 Review of Adverse Impacts on Future Value Adding 19 Projects (Mining) 5 Potential for New Mineral Discovery in the Area 20 Under Assessment for National Heritage Listing 6 Current Regulation of Mineral Exploration and Mining 22 in Tasmania 7 Tourism Overview 23 8 Forestry 24 Conclusion 25 Attachment Comments from Local Government Authorities 27 1 2 Potential Socio-economic implications for Tasmania of the Proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine area Executive Summary As outlined in the Tasmanian Government’s submission to the Australian Heritage Council on the Proposed National Heritage listing, the Tasmanian Government does not agree with the proposed National Heritage values and boundary listing of the area of North-West Tasmania referred to as the Tarkine. The Government has issues with the approach taken to identifying values within the proposed boundary. In addition, pursuant to section 324JJ (5)(b) of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999, the Government wishes to draw to the attention of the Minister that it believes serious immediate and long term social impacts should be taken into account which would occur in an already depressed region of Tasmania resulting from the closure of key industries such as mining and forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction of the Thylacine
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.18.427214; this version posted January 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Main Manuscript title: Extinction of the Thylacine. 2 3 Authors: Barry W. Brook1,2*, Stephen R. Sleightholme3, Cameron R. Campbell4, Ivan Jarić5,6 4 and Jessie C. Buettel1,2. 5 6 Affiliations: 7 1 School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Australia. 8 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH). 9 3 Project Director - International Thylacine Specimen Database (ITSD), 26 Bitham Mill, 10 Westbury, BA13 3DJ, UK. 11 4 Curator of the online Thylacine Museum: http://www.naturalworlds.org/thylacine/ 8707 Eagle 12 Mountain Circle, Fort Worth, TX 76135, USA. 13 5 Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České 14 Budějovice, Czech Republic. 15 6 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecosystem Biology, České 16 Budějovice, Czech Republic. 17 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 18 19 Author Contributions: B.W.B., S.R.S., C.R.C. and J.C.B. conceived the project and developed 20 the database, B.W.B. performed the data analysis and wrote the paper, B.W.B., I.J. and J.C.B. 21 created the display items. All authors discussed the draft structure, results, and interpretation, and 22 commented on the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 1
    2017/18 Annual Report Kentish Council Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 1 Kentish Council PO Box 63 (69 High Street) SHEFFIELD TAS 7306 P: 6491 0200 F: 6491 1659 E: [email protected] W: www.kentish.tas.gov.au Front Cover: Kelly Slater Kentish Council Annual Report 2017/18 | 2 WELCOME CONTENTS THE YEAR IN REVIEW 4 The Kentish Council proudly presents the Mayor & General Manager’s Welcome 5 2017/18 Annual Report to the Community. Performance at a Glance 6 Kentish Profile 7 The Annual Report highlights Council’s A Year in Kentish 8 performance against the 2017/18 Annual Plan Activity Overview 9 and Budget. Financial Overview 14 OUR PERFORMANCE 23 The Annual Plan and Budget sets out 18 strategic Infrastructure 25 objectives grouped under four categories: Economic & Community Development 34 1. Infrastructure; Governance & Organisational Development 40 2. Economic and Community Development; Planning & Development 48 3. Governance and Organisational Development; and GOVERNANCE 54 4. Planning and Development Corporate Governance 55 against which Council’s performance is measured. Our Councillors 61 Our Organisation 65 Section 72 of the Local Government Act 1993 Our Staff 67 requires all councils to prepare an Annual Report Our Volunteers 69 including prescribed content. Workplace Health & Safety 70 Legislative Reporting 71 As well as meeting this statutory requirement, General Reporting 77 Council sees the Annual Report as a great opportunity to keep residents and stakeholders FINANCIAL REPORT 79 informed about its performance and future direction. The report demonstrates the breadth of Council’s operations and identifies achievements and challenges during the 2017/18 financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Response To, and Lessons Learnt From, Recent Bushfires in Remote Tasmanian Wilderness
    Submission to the Senate Inquiry: Response to, and lessons learnt from, recent bushfires in remote Tasmanian wilderness. Summary This submission addresses “part f) any related matter”, as it refers to events occurring outside the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nevertheless, it is the opinion of the author that these events deserve scrutiny in that the bushfires occurring in a wilderness area (ie the Tarkine) as a result of climate change impacts, bore direct adverse impacts on public health, animal welfare and regional economics for a prolonged period due to inadequate planning and resourcing of fire fighting services. This occurred despite recent recommendations in the 2013 Tasmanian Bushfires Inquiry advising early and comprehensive intervention in remote fires. These are dealt with in Part 1. Additionally, the Tarkine area has been identified as having World Heritage Values and campaigns continue to have this area recognized as a National Park. There was significant impact on this landscape in the recent fire events resulting from global warming climate and weather outcomes, and delayed fire fighting response due to lack of resources despite recommendations made repeatedly in previous years. This is addressed in Part 2. Several aspects of this Northwest fire event are pertinent to the other terms of reference listed. This submission seeks to examine the events in detail: the timing, resources, coordination and limitations of the emergency response, the fire behavior & its predictability, wilderness and industry environmental factors precipitating the event, the relevant local impacts of global warming, and make some recommendations to direct future emergency response to wilderness fires posing significant risk to adjacent communities and globally significant natural values.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Convicts
    GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, INC. PO Box 60, PROSPECT, Tasmania 7250 PATRON His Excellency General Sir Phillip Bennett, A.C., K.B.E., D.S.O., Governor of Tasmania. EXECUTIVE President: Mrs. D. McNeice (002) 28 3564 Vice President: Mrs. D. Collins ( 004) 3 1 1 1 13 Vice President: Mr. D. Harris (004) 24 5328 Executive Secretary: Mrs. C. Read (002) 44 4527 Executive Treasurer: Mr. G. Thom (002) 28 3298 COMMITTEE Mrs. V. Dudman, Mr. J. Grunnell, Mrs. I.Harris, Mrs. P. Harris, Mrs. C. Morris, Mrs. A. Rawlins, Mrs. B. Richardson, Mrs. M. Rumney, Mrs. I. Schaffer, Mrs. M. Strempel. JOURNAL EDITOR Mrs. A. Bartlett (003) 44 5258 JOURNAL CO-ORDINATOR Mrs. B. Perkins (003) 39 1270 LIBRARY CO-ORDINATOR Mr. M. Lansdell (002) 23 2226 MEMBERS INTERESTS and AGCI Mr. A. Wilson (002) 44 1837 MEMBERSHIP SECRET ARY Mrs. L, Hookway (004) 33 0767 PUBLIC OFFICER Mr. J. Wall (002) 43 6810 RESEARCH CO-ORDINATOR Mr. J. Dare (004) 24 7889 SALES & PUBLICATIONS CO-ORDINATOR Mrs. A. Bartlett (003) 44 5258 T AMIOT CO-ORDINATOR Mrs. B. Calverley (003) 44 5608 VDL HERITAGE INDEX Mr. N. Chick (002) 28 2083 BRANCHES OF THE SOCIETY Burnie: PO Box 748 BURNIE 7320 Devon port: PO Box 587, DEVONPORT 7310 Hobart: GPO Box 640G, HOBART 7001 Huon: PO Box 117, HUONVILLE 7109 Launceston: PO Box 1290, LAUNCESTON 7250 TASMANIAN ANCESTRY Yol13No4 March 1993 ISSN 0159-0677 Editorial Panel - Anne Bartlett, Jenny Gill, Jo Keen, Maureen Martin, Bet Wood Postal Address:· PO Box 60 PROSPECT, Tasmania 7250 Contents Editorial .. ................... .. ....... .. .. ...... .... .. .......... ........................ ........ .. .. .. .. .... ... .... .... .. .. .. ... 178 President's Message .
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Reform in Tasmania 1906-1939: with Special Reference to the North West Coast
    Local Government Reform in Tasmania 1906-1939: with special reference to the North West Coast Grant Rootes A Thesis submitted as part of the requ ir ements for the degree of Ma ster of Arts in History School of History and Classics University of Tasmania April 2004 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other university and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. .. ,r;�::?.�.!h.�...... Date . ... ;.?._.. S ..... ./.... �....... /2004 I authorise the reading of this thesis by bona fid e researchers, students, and members of the staff of the University of Tasmania, and it may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. .6 '?V!-:d./!a-2!:?:-:. .... '}'/ �� ( Date .... .... ./ ... ........ ./2004 Abstract This thesis examines local government reform in Tasmania primarily between 1906 and 1939. The Local Government Act 1906 gave the state for the first time a comprehensive system of municipal government. This Act arose from the economic pressures placed on the new state government by federation. The government had tried several times to impose a more efficient system on the island, but failed due to an obstinate Legislative Council and strident opposition from local bodies. The 1906 Act was a compromise between the aim of the government for greater economy and efficiency and the desire of local bodies to preserve their existing interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Details
    Place Details • edit search • new search Send Feedback The Tarkine, Waratah Rd, Savage River, TAS, Australia Photographs: None List: National Heritage List Class: Natural Legal Status: Place not included in NHL Place ID: 105751 Place File No: 6/02/031/0052 Nominator's Summary Statement of Significance: Summary of National Heritage Values in the Tarkine This summary is adapted from Draft Proposal for a Tarkine National Park (in. press) This proposal is for a National Heritage Area in the Tarkine Wilderness in North- West Tasmania. The proposal covers an area of 447,000 ha. The word 'Tarkine' has been adopted for the region in recognition of the Tarkine (Tar.kine.ner) people who occupied the Sandy Cape region of the Tarkine' Coast for many thousands of years. The natural and cultural values of the Tarkine are well recognised and include; - The largest single tract of rainforest in Australia, and the largest Wilderness dominated by rainforest in Australia; - 190,000 ha of rainforest in total; - The northern limit of Huon Pine (Lagarostrobus franklinii); - A high diversity of wet eucalypt (tall) forests including large, contiguous areas of Eucalyptus obliqua; - A great diversity of other vegetation communities, such as; dry sclerophyll forest and woodland, buttongrass moorland, sandy littoral communities, wetlands, grassland, dry coastal vegetation and sphagnum communities; - A high diversity of non-vascular plants (mosses, liverworts and lichens) including at least 151 species of liverworts and 92 species of mosses; - A diverse vertebrate
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Investment Proposal April 2021
    04-2021 Regional Investment Proposal Dulverton Organics Recycling Facility: Upgrade Program Project Summary Implementation-ready, major investment project creating 102 jobs in Tasmania and underpinning 1000 existing food manufacturing jobs. Operating the upgraded facility will require four ongoing positions and support 20 indirect, ongoing positions in the North West. $16.05 million infrastructure investment in Tasmania ideally suited for three-tier government support. Significant scale and industry-reach, innovative plant construction with closed-loop leachate and enclosed odour control, plus a technology life of 25+ years. Aligned with Tasmanian Government policies of building Tasmania’s infrastructure for the 21st century, essential service delivery and more jobs for regional Tasmania. Construction phase will result in a direct contribution of $11.3M into the Tasmanian economy through the utilisation of Tasmanian contractors and suppliers. Strengthens Tasmania’s biosecurity and quarantine capabilities and delivers TasWater Trade Waste Policy solutions for biosolids and grease-trap waste. Delivers against the Cradle Coast Waste Management Group Strategy and Tasmanian Government’s Draft Waste Action Plan 2019 to reduce the volume of organic waste sent to landfill by 25% by 2025 and 50% by 2030. Addresses the 46% of North West landfill waste classified as organics and assists the introduction of a regional-scale organics kerbside collection and processing service for 40,000 households. Announced as a Project of Regional Importance in June 2020 by North West Tasmania’s Regional Economic Development Steering Group and Cradle Coast Authority Board. Proven operational capabilities and project governance, backed by Kentish Council, Latrobe Council, Waratah Wynyard Council, Circular Head Council, Burnie City Council, Devonport City Council, Central Coast Council and Dulverton Waste Management (national Landfill Excellence Award winner 2017).
    [Show full text]