Planty08 UTILCODE PLNTCODE PLNTNAME 7 10867 Tate & Lyle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Economic Development
January/February 2017 GEORGIA’S ECONOMIC POLITICAL OUTLOOK GPTQ DESIGN AWARDS PAT WILSON GEORGIA’S NEW COMMISSIONER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 1 2 ENGINEERING GEORGIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 26 COVER STORY: ADVANCING THE ECONOMY From Film to Factories, Georgia’s Economic Development Efforts Hinge Upon a Skilled Workforce and Industry Partnerships 34 GEORGIA’S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Viewpoints on the State’s Economic Vitality, Market Trends and Top Issues 42 TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSPORTATION DESIGN A Look Back at the 2016 GPTQ 26 Preconstruction Design Awards 6 THE PULSE News Coverage from In and Around the Engineering Community 50 PROJECT SPOTLIGHT A Whole New Ballgame: Inside the Underground Detention System at SunTrust Park 55 ASSOCIATION NEWS Updates from Georgia Engineering Associations 66 ENGINEERS BEYOND THEIR CAREERS 34 42 Pursuing Passions Outside of the Industry CHECK OUT OUR NEW LOOK ONLINE! ON THE COVER View Engineering Georgia’s new website at EngineeringGa.com for Pat Wilson, the new Commissioner of the Georgia behind-the-scenes photos, exclusive online-only articles and more Department of Economic Development, shot exclusively for Engineering Georgia by about the official magazine of Georgia’s engineering industry. Matt Druin – Matt Druin + Co. Photography. JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 3 Publisher: Michael “Sully” Sullivan Editor-in-Chief: EDITORIAL Sasha Ugi BOARD Managing Editor: Nikki Welch ANITA ATKINSON P.E., Patterson & Dewar Engineers, Inc./ASCE Georgia Creative Director | Designer: Sabrina Tongren CHAD BECKER Kimley-Horn www.in8-design.com JEFF CORBIN Parsons STEPHANIE DAMMEN-MORRELL Hussey Gay Bell Contributing Editors: MICHELLE ERSTE Wolverton & Associates, Inc./SMPS Atlanta Kasie Bolling Allison Floyd ERIK M. -
Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian -
Florida Keys Vessel Pumpout Facilities Marine Sanitation Device
Marine Sanitation Device Discharge Regulations Effective: December 27, 2010 Activities prohibited Sanctuary-Wide: q Discharge of sewage incidental to vessel use and generated by a marine sanitation device in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (also called the Clean Water Act). q Having a marine sanitation device that is not secured in a manner that prevents discharges or deposits of treated and untreated sewage. Acceptable methods include, but are not limited to, all methods that have been approved by the U.S. Coast Guard. Pumpout facilities are located throughout the Keys to assist boat operators in complying with this rule. For a list of pumpout facilities, visit http://www.dep.state.fl.us/cleanmarina/about.htm. Florida Keys Vessel Pumpout Facilities * Designated Clean Marina Facility Key West Duck Key Mobile Pumpout Services • A & B Marina • Hawk’s Cay Resort Marina Free pumpout services for vessels • Conch Harbor Marina* anchored within unincorporated Long Key • City Marina at Garrison Bight* Monroe County (Key Largo, • Key West Bight Marina* • Fiesta Key KOA Tavernier, Cudjoe, Big Pine, Stock Stock Island Upper Matecumbe Key Island, etc.) and the Village of • Stock Island Marina Village • Bayside Marina- World Wide Sportsman* Islamorada. • Sunset Marina • Coral Bay Marina • Pumpout USA at 305-900-0263 or visit www.po-keys.com. Lower Keys Plantation Key • Plantation Yacht Harbor* • Bahia Honda State Park* • City of Key West 305-292-8167 • Sunshine Key RV Resort & Marina • Treasure Harbor Marine* • Stock Island, Mark LPS 305-587-2787 Marathon Tavernier • City of Marathon 305-289-8877 • Boot Key Harbor City Marina • Mangrove Marina • Key Colony Beach 305-289-1310 • Burdines Waterfront • Marathon Yacht Club Key Largo • Panchos Fuel Dock & Marina • All Keys Portalet Tips: • Sombrero Marina Dockside* • John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park* • Check with marina ahead of time on • Manatee Bay Marina status of pumpout equipment. -
Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. -
TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy. -
Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
+44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy. -
Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders. -
Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001. -
Are State Constitutional Conventions Things of the Past? the Ncri Easing Role of the Constitutional Commission in State Constitutional Change Robert F
Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium Volume 1 Article 4 1-1-1996 Are State Constitutional Conventions Things of the Past? The ncrI easing Role of the Constitutional Commission in State Constitutional Change Robert F. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlps Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Robert F. (1996) "Are State Constitutional Conventions Things of the Past? The ncrI easing Role of the Constitutional Commission in State Constitutional Change," Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium: Vol. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlps/vol1/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS THINGS OF THE PAST? THE INCREASING ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE* ROBERT F WILLIAMS** Increasing use of the constitutional commission as an auxiliary device for initiating both major and minor changes is one of the most significant developments in the procedure of modernizing state constitutions. Constitutional commissions were developed initially, and have been used primarily, as auxiliary staff arms of state legislative assemblies. Their principal function has been to provide expert advice on constitutional problems and issues and to propose and draft amendments, revisions, and even entire constitutions. The 1968 Florida Constitution was the first state organic law to accord constitutional status to the commission as a formal method of proposing constitutional change. -
Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST. -
Outside Counsel Firm/Attorney/Consultant Address
Outside Counsel Firm/Attorney/Consultant Address City State Zip IES Company Name Role Type of Case Akin Gump Strauss 1111 Louisana Street, 44th Floor Houston TX 77002 Ron's Electric, Inc., dba IES - North Plains Defendant Employment Agreement Dispute Allen & Gooch 1015 St. John Street Lafayette LA 70501 IES New Iberia, Inc./ Ernest P. Breaux Defendant Wrongful Termination Allen and Gooch 1015 St. John Street/PO Drawer 3768 Lafayette LA 70502 IES New Iberia, Inc./ Ernest P. Breaux Defendant Property Damage Allen Martin & Blue 121 Majorca Ave., Suite 300 Coral Gables FL 33134 Daniel Electrical Contractors, Inc. Both Employment Agreement Dispute * Baker & McKenzie 2300 Trammell Crow Center Dallas TX 75201 Bryant Electric Comm. Dispute Bracewell & Patterson, LLP 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900 Houston TX 77002 Galbraith Electric Co., Inc. Defendant Property Damage Brazeale Sachese & Wilson LLP PO Box 3197 Baton Rouge LA 70821 Cypress Electrical Contractors, Inc. Plaintiff Collection Bugg & Wolf P. O. Box 2917 Durham NC 27715 Bryant Electric Both Comm. Dispute Burns Day & Presnell 2626 Glenwood Ave., Suite 560 Raleigh NC 27608 Houston-Stafford Electric Holdings III, Inc. Plaintiff Collection Canterbury Stuber Elder 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1000 Dallas TX 75244 Pollock Summit Electric LP Defendant NLRB Carter & Ansley 191 Peachtree Tower Atlanta GA 30303 Mark Henderson, Incorporated Defendant Personal Injury * Chamberlain Hrdlicka 191 Peachtree Street North East, 9th Fl Atlanta GA 30303 Bryant Electric Company, Inc. Both Commercial Dispute Cheifetz, Iannitelli, Marcolini, PC 1850 N. Central Avenue Phoenix AZ 85004 Hatfield Reynolds Electric Company Both Collection Chrissinger & Baumberger Three Milll Road, Suite 301 Wilmington DE 19806 Primo Electric Company Defendant Property Damage DeCaro Doran Siciliano 4601 Forbes Blvd., Suite 200 Lanham MD 20703 ARC Electric, Incorporated Defendant Personal Injury, Property Damage Bryant Electric Company, Inc. -
Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.