KBSP Local Arrangements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KBSP Local Arrangements KEEPING BRISTOL SAFE PARTNERSHIP Local Arrangements 2019/20 Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group July 2019 2 KEEPING BRISTOL SAFE PARTNERSHIP Contents 1 Introduction 2 Background 3 Priorities 4 Local Safeguarding Arrangements and Partners in Bristol 4.1 Geographical Boundary 4.2 Relevant Agencies 4.3 Early Years settings, schools, and other educational establishments 4.4 Residential Homes and Care Providers 4.5 Youth custody 4.6 Resourcing 5 Scrutiny and Assurance 5.1 Role of the Independent Chair 5.2 Partnership Oversight and Scrutiny Arrangements 5.3 Independent Scrutiny 5.4 Scrutiny Assurance Framework 5.5 Participation and Engagement 5.6 Policy and Procedure 6 Business Delivery and KBSP Structure 6.1 Business Delivery and Performance Groups 6.2 Task and Finish Groups 6.3 KBSP Structure 7 Statutory Reviews 8 Data and Intelligence 9 Thresholds 10 Annual Reports 11 Commissioning Multi Agency Training Appendices 1 Relevant Agencies LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 1. Introduction This document sets out the new multi-agency � ‘new’ safeguarding issues are identified early safeguarding arrangements in Bristol, known locally as � learning is promoted and embedded Keeping Bristol Safe Partnership (KBSP). � information is shared effectively The KBSP partnership has responsibility (and will be � the public feel confident that Bristol citizens are constituted) to deliver statutory duties to safeguard protected from harm and promote the wellbeing of children as required by The launch of this multi-agency integrated safeguarding Working Together to Safeguard Children 20181; to help and community safety partnership reflects Bristol’s and protect adults at risk of neglect and/or abuse by ambition to work collaboratively across local agencies delivering the functions of a Safeguarding Adults Board 2 and organisations to develop an equitable and robust (SAB) as required by The Care Act 2014 ; and to protect partnership. The arrangements set out an innovative new our local communities from crime and to help people feel way of working across the safeguarding system ensuring safe by delivering the functions of a Community Safety that contextual, place-based responses are modelled and Partnership Board (CSP) in accordance with the Crime facilitated by the strategic senior leadership. The KBSP 3 and Disorder Act 1998 . is a key driver of change as it brings partners together at a strategic and operational level, ensuring a proactive In responding to change, the safeguarding partners along and responsive approach to the needs of children, adults with local agencies and organisations are committed and communities and drives opportunities to shape to the transformational journey to improve local and influence policy development leading to improved safeguarding arrangements and outcomes for children, practice and outcomes. adults and communities. With specific regard to promoting the safeguarding and Under the KBSP arrangements, agencies will work welfare of children these arrangements were published together in a system where: on 29th June 2019 and will be implemented by 29th � the views and experiences of children, young September 2019 as required by Working Together 2018. people, families and adults are at the centre of all The arrangements will be refreshed and republished by we do January 2020. We will refine and shape the arrangements � excellent practice is the norm for adults and communities and taking account of our � partner agencies hold one another to account learning from bringing these functions together and effectively supporting us to embed the partnership. Jacqui Jensen Andy Marsh Julia Ross Executive Director Chief Constable Chief Executive Bristol City Council Avon and Somerset Police Bristol, North Somerset, South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children--2 2 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/contents/enacted 3 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/37/contents 4 KEEPING BRISTOL SAFE PARTNERSHIP 2. Background In 2016 the Government, in response to the Wood adults live in communities. We will take a person centred, Review (2015), proposed a stronger more flexible place based approach to safeguarding, one that is not statutory framework to support local partners to work bound by notional or unhelpful divides such as that together more effectively to protect and safeguard between vulnerable children and vulnerable adults. children and young people, embedding improved multi- agency behaviours and practice which are set out in It is our intention that the new partnership arrangements the Children and Social Work Act 2017 and Working will enable and support innovative solutions to high Together to Safeguard Children 2018. risk complex situations, for example extra-familial and complex safeguarding (the risk in the environment rather This legislation ends the local authority’s duty to have a than the traditional risk in the home) and will facilitate a Local Safeguarding Children Board and instead requires whole system approach. three statutory partners (Local Authority, Police and Clinical Commissioning Group) to have a shared and The proposed structure supports the strategic aims of the equal duty to make arrangements to work together to Bristol’s One City Plan (2019)4 which has the ambition safeguard and promote the welfare of children in a local that no one is left behind and everyone can achieve their area. Partners in Bristol took the opportunity to review potential; that we learn from the past and take action and restructure the strategic arrangements across the to unlock the future; that diversity is recognised as an safeguarding system. asset; and that we work in partnership with each other to We recognise the changing landscape of safeguarding achieve shared ambitions. and noted considerable and growing overlaps in the These arrangements are set to enable strength based, issues of concern to the LSCB, SAB and CSP and the aspirational and optimistic approaches for children, shortfalls that can result from silo working that these groups may inadvertently create. The partnership adults and communities. The partnership is focussed identified an increase in connectivity between the on enabling and empowering children, young people groups for example, sexual exploitation, hate crime, and adults to be more resilient and safeguarded within modern slavery, serious violence and gang crime, criminal their families, peer groups, schools and communities exploitation and mate crime that affects children, adults, and to find resolutions for themselves, for example families and communities. in recognising that by taking a life course approach, reducing Adverse Childhood Experiences will improve We recognise that children live in families; families and individual’s aspirations and achievements in adulthood. 4 https://www.bristolonecity.com/one-city-plan LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3. Priorities The outgoing Boards have developed strategic and The Strategic plan 2020-23 can be found here. business plans based on consultation with the public. It is the commitment of the KBSP that the delivery of improvements is not impaired by the transition to new arrangements. Therefore the KBSP commits to continuing to deliver against the following integrated priorities over the next 9 months whilst the 2020-2023 KBSP Strategic Plan is consulted on and developed. Further detailed business activity such as delivering action plans from statutory reviews has transferred to the new arrangements as agreed by the outgoing Boards. Priority 1 – End to end excellent Integrated Partnership that is equipped to seamlessly meet the ever-changing needs of our communities Priority 2 – Citizens of Bristol are our equal partners Ensuring individuals and their choices remain the centre of all work Priority 3 – Domestic Abuse response across the life-course Commission and deliver domestic abuse services which are trauma- informed and recovery-focused Priority 4 – Seamless transitions Priority 5 – Safe in our communities-Safe in our homes 6 KEEPING BRISTOL SAFE PARTNERSHIP 4. Local Safeguarding Arrangements and Partners in Bristol The arrangements meet each of the individual statutory As set out in Working Together 2018 and the Care Act requirements in respect of representation and leadership. 2014 (statutory guidance), the lead representatives are Further detail about how this will be achieved is set out in able to delegate their functions although they retain the document and the constitution of the partnership. accountability for any actions or decisions taken on behalf of their agency. In Bristol, the lead representatives have The three named statutory partners defined under the identified the following senior officers in their respective Children Act 2004 (as amended by the Children and agencies who have responsibility and authority for Social Work Act 2017) are the Local Authority, a clinical ensuring full participation with these arrangements5. commissioning group for an area any part of which falls within the local authority area and the chief officer of The senior officers have delegated authority to speak on police for an area any part of which falls within the local behalf of the safeguarding partner they represent, make authority area. decisions on behalf of their organisation or agency and commit them on policy, resourcing and practice matters, Working Together 2018 identifies the lead and will hold their own organisation or agency to
Recommended publications
  • COTHAM SCHOOL Claimant - and - BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL Defendant
    Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1022 (Admin) Case No: CO/1208/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 3 May 2018 Before: SIR WYN WILLIAMS (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: THE QUEEN on the application of COTHAM SCHOOL Claimant - and - BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL Defendant - and - (1) DAVID MAYER Interested (2) BRISTOL UNIVERSITY Parties (3) ROCKLEAZE RANGERS FOOTBALL CLUB - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Claimant was represented by Richard Ground QC and Dr Ashley Bowes (instructed by Harrison Grant Solicitors) The Defendant was represented by Stephen Morgan (instructed by The Defendant’s Legal Services Department) The First Interested Party was represented by Andrew Sharland QC (instructed by DAC Beachcroft) The Second and Third Interested Parties did not appear and were not represented Hearing dates: 21 and 22 November 2017 Further written submissions on behalf of the Claimant dated 20 April 2018, the First Interested Party dated 22 April 2018 and the Defendant dated 23 April 2018 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment Judgment Approved by the court for handing down. The Queen on the application of Cotham School v Bristol City Council & Ors Sir Wyn Williams: Introduction 1. The Defendant is the registered owner of the freehold interest in an area of land known as Stoke Lodge Playing Fields, Shirehampton Road, Stoke Bishop, in the city of Bristol (hereinafter referred to as “the land”). It is also the Commons Registration Authority empowered to register land as a town or village green pursuant to section 15 Commons Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”).
    [Show full text]
  • England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey
    England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey College Birmingham 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 865/4000 Abbeyfield School Chippenham 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton-on-Trent 312/5409 Abbotsfield School Uxbridge 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 825/6015 Akeley Wood Senior School Buckingham 935/4059 Alde Valley School Leiston 919/6003 Aldenham School Borehamwood 891/4117 Alderman White School and Language College Nottingham 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 845/4003 ARK William Parker Academy Hastings 371/4021 Armthorpe Academy Doncaster 885/4008 Arrow Vale RSA Academy Redditch 937/5401 Ash Green School Coventry 371/4000 Ash Hill Academy Doncaster 891/4009 Ashfield Comprehensive School Nottingham 801/4030 Ashton
    [Show full text]
  • Allocation Statement September 2016 Year 7 Intake Ashton Park School
    Allocation Statement September 2016 Year 7 Intake Ashton Park School As Ashton Park is oversubscribed, the criteria stated in the booklet “A guide for parents and carers on applying for a secondary school place for the school year 2016-2017” have been applied to allocate the places that are available at the school. 434 on-time applications have been received for Ashton Park School which has an admission number of 216. 2 places are required at the school as it is named in their Statement of Special Educational Need/ Education Health & Care Plan (EHCP). The remaining 214 places have been allocated using the Academy’s published admissions criteria as follows; How the Initial Allocation of Places was made The 214 places have been offered to the following children: 1. Those children who are defined as 'Children in Care'; or children who were previously in care, but immediately after being in care became subject to an adoption, residence, or special guardianship order. (2 places). 2. Siblings living in the school’s area of first priority where there are older siblings of statutory school age in attendance at the school and who will still be on roll in the year of entry. The term “sibling” means a full, step, half, adopted or fostered brother or sister, or other child living permanently within the same household. The school reserves the right to ask for proof of relationship. (44 places) 3. Children who live the nearest distance from the School within the area of first priority. (123 places) 4. Children living outside Ashton Park’s first area with older siblings attending the school and who will be still on roll in the year of entry.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Schools Who Process Their Own in Year Admissions
    List of Schools who process their own In Year admissions If a Bristol school appears on this list you will need to apply directly to the school. We are unable to process applications for any school on this list. Primary, Infant and Junior Schools (4-11) St Bonaventure's Catholic Ashton Vale Primary Henbury Court Academy Primary Bannerman Road Academy Holy Cross Catholic Primary St Joseph’s Catholic Primary Badocks Wood E-ACT Hotwells Primary St Mary Redcliffe Academy Academy Ilminster Avenue E-ACT St Nicholas Of Tolentine Barton Hill Academy Academy Catholic Primary Bridge Learning Campus Little Mead Academy St Patrick’s Catholic Primary May Park Primary St Pius X Catholic Primary Cathedral Primary (closing 31.8.2021) Cheddar Grove Primary Merchant’s Academy St Teresa's Catholic Primary Easton CE Academy Oasis Academy Bank Leaze St Ursula's E-ACT Academy Elmlea Infant School Oasis Academy Connaught School of Christ the King Catholic Primary Elmlea Junior School Oasis Academy Long Cross Stoke Bishop C of E Primary Fairlawn Academy Oasis Academy Marksbury Road Stoke Park Primary Filton Avenue Primary Oasis Academy New Oak The Dolphin School Fishpond CE Academy Our Lady of the Rosary Catholic The Kingfisher School Primary Fonthill Academy Parson Street Primary Wansdyke Primary School Four Acres Academy Perry Court E-ACT Academy Waycroft Academy Greenfield E-ACT Academy Redfield Educate Together West Town Lane Academy Primary Academy Hareclive E-ACT Academy SS Peter & Paul Catholic Primary Wicklea Academy St Anne’s Infant Woodlands Academy
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Schools - Open Sessions 2017
    SECONDARY SCHOOLS - OPEN SESSIONS 2017 Ashton Park School: Evening Thursday 21st September 2017 - 6pm – 8:30pm Day Monday 25th and Tuesday 26th September 2017 Monday 16th and Monday 30th October 2017 All 11.15am - 12.30pm Bedminster Down School: Evening Thursday 14th September 2017 - 6pm – 8pm Morning Saturday 7th October 2017 - 10am – 12pm Bridge Learning Campus: Evening Tuesday 26th September 2017 - 5pm – 7 pm Morning Saturday 30th September 2017 - 10am – 12pm School Tours are available at any time – call to arrange Bristol Brunel Academy: Evening Wednesday 20th September 2017 - 6pm – 8:30pm Morning Friday 22nd, Monday 25th and Tuesday 26th September 2017 All 9am – 10:30am Bristol Cathedral Choir School: Evening Tuesday 12th September 2017 - 5:30pm – 8pm (last tour 7:30pm) Morning Saturday 23rd September 2017 - 9am – 1pm (last tour 12:30am) (No requirement to book, Principal’s talk throughout the morning) Bristol Free School: Morning & Afternoon Tuesday 19th September 2017 - Morning and Afternoons Wednesday 27th September 2017 - Morning, Afternoon and Evening Thursday 19th October 2017 - Morning and Afternoon Registration required at: www.bristolfreeschool.org.uk Bristol Metropolitan Academy: Evening Monday 18th September 2017 - 6pm – 8pm Morning Saturday 16th September 2017 - 9am – 12pm Academy Tours Tuesday 19th, Wednesday 20th, Thursday 21st and Friday 22nd September 2017 - All 9:30am – 11am City Academy: Evening Thursday 21st September 2017 Morning 12th September until 19th October 2017 - 9am – 10.30am every Tuesday, Wednesday and
    [Show full text]
  • Globe 140611
    June 2011 INSIDE Who’s keeping an eye on College Green? The Memory Shed all our histories Music in Exile A taste of England Welcome to my home My favourite food… Kenya comes to Bristol Faith in the City Bristol City of Sanctuary Steering Committee Bristol City of Sanctuary Supporters CONTENTS June Burrough (Chair) Founder and Director, The Pierian Centre Co If your organisation would like to be Hotwells Primary School ng 3 Letter to Bristol ratula added this lists, please visit Imayla International Organisation tions Lorraine Ayensu Team Manager, Asylum Support and Refugee In - www.cityofsanctuary.org/bristol for Migration Inderjit Bhogal tegration Team, Bristol City Council Churches Council for Industry and Alistair Beattie Chief Executive, Faithnetsouthwest ACTA Community Theatre Social Responsibility 4 Editorial Caroline Beatty Co-ordinator, The Welcome Centre, Bristol African and Caribbean Chamber of John Wesley’s Chapel Mike Jempson to Bris Commerce and Enterprise Kalahari Moon to Refugee Rights l – Jo Benefield Bristol Defend Asylum Campaign African Initiatives Kenya Association in Bristol 5 A movement gaining ground Adam Cutler Bristol Central Libraries African Voices Forum Kingswood Methodist Church Stan Hazell Afrika Eye Malcom X Centre Mohammed Elsharif Secretary, Sudanese Association Amnesty International Bristol MDC Bristol Elinor Harris Area Manager, Refugee Action, Bristol p 6-7 The Memory Shed ro Group Methodist Church, South West ud to b Reverend Canon Tim Higgins The City Canon, Bristol Cathedral Eugene Byrne e Anglo-Iranian
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Main Building Whitehall London SW1A 2HB United Kingdom Telephone : +44 (0)20 721 89000
    Ministry of Defence Main Building Whitehall London SW1A 2HB United Kingdom Telephone : +44 (0)20 721 89000 Our Reference: XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX Dear XXXXXXXXX, Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Defence (MOD) dated XXXXXXX in which you requested the following information: Please provide the following information: 1. How many armed forces visits to schools have taken place to schools in Bristol in the most recent academic year for which data are available. 2. The purpose of those visits; 3. What types of activities took place. I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) 2000. In regard to your request, the data for Army visits to schools is exempt under Section 21 of the FOIA, because it is already in the public domain at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi-responses-published-by-mod-week-commencing- 2-november-2015 I can confirm that the MOD does hold the remaining information within the scope of your request; this is provided in the attached Annex. School visits can comprise presentations, citizenship talks, meetings with staff, participation in career events, practice interviews and activities with the students, such as science and maths challenges, and other indoor or outdoor exercises. The Armed Forces never visit schools for recruitment purposes and would only ever visit a school after being invited by a teacher to support school activities. Similar contributions to schools are made by the Police, Fire, Ambulance and other emergency services. The Armed Forces receive numerous requests from schools each year and the three Services take these opportunities to both explain their role, and to assist schools in teaching valuable skills such as leadership, teamwork and citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 114/11 Crimes in Schools September 2010 – February 2011
    FOI 114/11 Crimes in Schools September 2010 – February 2011 Incident Premisies Name Town / City Current Offence Group Count Abbeywood Community School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 4 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Criminal Damage 1 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 4 Alexandra Park Beechen Cliff School Bath Violence Against The Person 1 Allen School House Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 0 Archbishop Cranmer Community C Of E School Taunton Burglary 1 Ashcombe Cp School Weston-Super-Mare Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 2 Ashcombe Primary School Weston-Super-Mare Violence Against The Person 0 Ashcott Primary School Bridgwater Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 0 Ashill Primary School Ilminster Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Ashley Down Infant School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 2 Ashton Park School Bristol Other Offences 1 Ashton Park School Bristol Sexual Offences 1 Ashton Park School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Avon Primary School Bristol Burglary 2 Backwell School Bristol Burglary 3 Backwell School Bristol Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Backwell School Bristol Violence Against The Person 1 Badminton School Bristol Violence Against The Person 0 Banwell Primary School Banwell Theft And Handling Stolen Goods 1 Bartletts Elm School Langport Criminal Damage 0 Barton Hill County Infant School & Nursery Bristol Burglary 1 Barton Hill Primary School Bristol Violence Against The Person 0 Barwick Stoford Pre School Yeovil Fraud Forgery 1 Batheaston Primary
    [Show full text]
  • Outrun 2011 to 2012
    OUTTURN 2011-12 DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION DATA COLLECTION LA Bristol City of LA No. 801 Year 2011-12 TABLE A SPENDING BY SCHOOLS Nursery Primary Secondary Special Schools Schools Schools Schools Total £ £ £ £ £ (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) EXPENDITURE 1 Teaching staff (E01) 2405470.4 59905550.79 33074836.5 7243632.1 102629489.8 2 Supply teaching staff (E02) 109799.2 2266041.82 537265.5 155924.9 3069031.42 3 TOTAL TEACHING STAFF 2515269.6 62171592.61 33612102 7399557 105698521.2 4 Education Support Staff (E03) 1951827.2 20504680.03 6109539.5 5583486.7 34149533.43 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 5 Premises staff (E04) 102974.4 2378181.41 916879.8 328467.9 3726503.51 6 Administrative & clerical staff (E05) 364175.8 5561638 4046825.4 841464.6 10814103.8 7 Catering Staff (E06) 0 72022.1 231132.7 107681.2 410836 8 Cost of other staff (E07) 159186.4 2358273.88 1288068.6 1381611 5187139.88 9 Indirect employee expenses (E08) 20931.4 251808.25 164809.3 62324.4 499873.35 10 Development and training (E09) 48942.5 524781.5 154284.7 161251.2 889259.9 11 Supply teacher insurance (E10) 38596 926164.92 53406.8 78761.8 1096929.52 12 Staff related insurance (E11) 29336.4 272333.96 0 52406.2 354076.56 13 TOTAL OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 764142.9 12345204.02 6855407.3 3013968.3 22978722.52 RUNNING EXPENSES 14 Building maintenance and improvement (E12) 250692.1 3054478.44 860730.5 377803.8 4543704.84 15 Grounds maintenance and improvement (E13) 57916.1 422702.53 110841.2 35078.1 626537.93 16 Cleaning and caretaking (E14) 117656.7 1773093.55 325222.4 123048.6 2339021.25 17 Water and
    [Show full text]
  • AAS for Schools
    Annual Activity Survey 2018 - What your Year 11 students have gone onto do in 2019 Stat School Total Students Residential Local Authority of Number of Students Students Oasis Academy John Williams 147 Bristol 144 Unknown 3 Activity of your students by DfE activity group Post 16 Activity Group Number of Students Current Situation Not Known 5 3.4% Employment 7 4.8% In Learning 133 90.5% NEET 2 1.4% Total 147 100% Local Authority Y12 Average NEET Y12 Average Current Situation Y12 Average In Learning Not Known Bath and North East Somerset 2.53 % 6.85% 89.07% Bristol, City of 1.15 % 5.21% 92.74% North Somerset 1.17 % 4.09% 94.34% South Gloucestershire 0.86 % 4.24% 94.42% What your students are doing in more detail Post 16 Participation Type Number of Students Apprenticeship 4 Cannot be contacted - no current address 1 Current situation not known 4 Employment with training (other) 1 Employment without training 2 Full time education - school sixth-form 11 Full-time education - further education 73 Full-time education - other 5 Full-time education - sixth-form college 43 Not available to labour market/learning - teenage parent 1 Part-time education 1 Seeking employment, education or training 1 Where students are undertaking their activity Post 16 Provider Name Number of Students 5 A2a 1 Ashton Park School 2 B & M 1 Bath College 2 Boomsatsuma 1 BRIDGWATER AND TAUNTON COLLEGE 1 Bristol Brunel Academy 1 Bristol Cathedral Choir School 1 Bristol City Football Club 2 Bristol Grammar School 1 Cabot Learning Federation 1 City of Bristol College 59 Coachmakers 2 Colston's Girls' School 2 Cotham School 1 Digitech Studio School 2 Education Otherwise (Home Educated) 1 HWV 1 Oasis Academy John Williams 4 Reflections Training Academy 1 REMIT GROUP LIMITED 1 S & B AUTOMOTIVE ACADEMY LIMITED 1 South Gloucestershire and Stroud College 2 St Brendan's Sixth Form College 42 St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School 8 Unknown Organisation 4 Weston College 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • School/College Name Post Code Group Size Abbeywood Community
    School/college name Post Code Group Size Abbeywood Community School BS34 8SF 60 Ashton Park School, Bristol BS3 2JL 70 Bath College BA1 1UP 260 Bath College BA1 1UP 260 Bath College BA11UP 50 Beechen Cliff School BA24RE 200 Bradley Stoke Community School BS32 9BS 100 Bridgwater & Taunton College TA5 2LS 48 Brimsham Green School BS37 7LB 73 Bristol Free School Sixth Form BS10 6NJ 60 Bristol Free School Sixth Form BS10 6NJ 55 Bristol Grammar School BS8 1SR 170 Bristol Grammar School BS8 1SR 170 Cathedral Schools Trust BS1 5TS 220 Chew Valley School BS40 8QB 90 Chipping Sodbury School BS37 6EW 40 Churchill Academy & Sixth Form BS25 5QN 140 Cirencester College GL7 1XA 100 City of Bristol College (College Green) 50 City of Bristol College (College Green) BS1 5UA 100 City of Bristol College (College Green) 50 City of Bristol College (College Green) BS1 5UA 100 Clevedon School BS21 6AH 100 Clifton High School BS83JD 30 Colston's School BS65RD 70 Downend Comprehensive School BS16 6XA 74 EF International Academy UK Ltd, Torquay TQ1 3BG 100 Frome Community College BA11 2HQ 100 Gordano School BS20 7QR 194 Hayesfield Sixth Form, Bath BA2 3LA 160 John Cabot Academy BS15 4JT 150 Kingswood School BA1 5RG 90 Midsomer Norton Sixth Form BA3 4AD 220 Nailsea School BS48 2HN 95 North Bristol Post 16 Centre BS6 6BU 75 Oldfield School BA1 9AB 27 Patchway Community College BS32 4AJ 40 Queen Elizabeth's Hospital School BS16 1QG 2 Ralph Allen School BA27AD 95 Redland Green School BS6 7EH 80 Sexey's School BA100DF 85 Sir Bernard Lovell Academy, Bristol BS30 *TS
    [Show full text]
  • A Review and Evaluation of Secondary School Accountability in England: Statistical Strengths, Weaknesses, and Challenges for ‘Progress 8’ Raised by COVID-19
    Social Research Institute A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for ‘Progress 8’ raised by COVID-19 Lucy Prior John Jerrim Dave Thomson George Leckie Quantitative Social Science Working Paper No. 21-12 April 2021 Disclaimer Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the UCL Social Research Institute. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. QSS Workings Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Quantitative Social Science UCL Social Research Institute University College London 55-59 Gordon Square London WC1H 0NU 2 Social Research Institute A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for ‘Progress 8’ raised by COVID-19 Lucy Prior1 John Jerrim2 Dave Thomson3 4 George Leckie Abstract School performance measures are published annually in England to hold schools to account and to support parental school choice. This article reviews and evaluates the ‘Progress 8’ secondary school accountability system for state-funded schools. We assess the statistical strengths and weaknesses of Progress 8 relating to: choice of pupil outcome attainment measure; potential adjustments for pupil input attainment and background characteristics; decisions around which schools and pupils are excluded from the measure; presentation of Progress 8 to users, choice of statistical model, and calculation of statistical uncertainty; and issues related to the volatility of school performance over time, including scope for reporting multi-year averages.
    [Show full text]