Abolitionists and Working-Class Problems In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abolitionists and Working-Class Problems In ABOLITIONISTS AND WORKING-CLASS PROBLEMS IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRIALIZATION By the same author JAMES GILLESPIE BIRNEY: Slaveholder to Abolitionist MEN AND BROTHERS: Anglo-American Antislavery Cooperation ABOLITIONISTS AND WORKING-CLASS PROBLEMS IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRIALIZATION BETTY FLADELAND M MACMILLAN © Betty Fladeland 1984 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1984 978-0-333-36207-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission First published 1984 by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London and Basingstoke Companies and representatives throughout the world British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Fladeland, Betty Abolitionists and working-class problems in the age of industrialization 1. Slavery - Great Britain - Anti-slavery movements I. Title 322.4'4'0941 HT1163 ISBN 978-1-349-06999-6 ISBN 978-1-349-06997-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-06997-2 Contents Acknowledgements VI Introduction Vll 1 Granville Sharp 1 2 A Quartet of Liverpudlians: William Rathbone, William Roscoe, James Currie and Edward Rushton 17 3 Joseph Sturge 49 4 Harriet Martineau 74 5 T. Perronet Thompson 93 6 Patrick Brewster and Henry Solly 111 7 Joseph Barker 132 Epilogue 171 Notes 176 Index 223 v Acknowledgements I should like to thank several colleagues in the field of antislavery research who have either directed me to materials, shared their own, or read and criticized these essays: the late Roger Anstey, Richard Blackett, Merton Dillon, Seymour Drescher, George Shepperson, Nicholas Spence, Fiona Spiers, Clare Taylor, James Walvin and John A. Woods. I should also like to thank the staff members of the British Library (including the Newspaper Library in Colindale and the Library of Political and Economic Science), Dr Williams's Library, the Friends House Library, University College Library and the Public Record Office, all in London; the Rhodes House and Bodleian Libraries in Oxford; Cambridge University Library; Birmingham Reference Library; the John Rylands and University of Manchester Libraries in Manchester; the Central Libraries and Harold Cohen Library in Liverpool; the Mitchell and University of Glasgow Libraries in Glasgow; the University of Edinburgh Library; the University of Hull Library; York Minster Library; the Record Office, Cumbria County; the Boston Public Library Manuscripts Division and Massachusetts Historical Library in Boston; the Historical Library of Pennsylvania; the State Historical Library of Nebraska; Duke University Library; and the Huntington Library. I especially wish to thank Mr Charles Holliday of the Morris Library, Southern Illinois University. Vl Introduction A question of some concern to current historians of the British and American antislavery movements is the degree of working­ class involvement in those causes. The issue appears as a recurring theme in several of the essays in a recently published volume edited by Christine Bolt and Seymour Drescher, Anti­ S lavery, Religion, and Reform (1980), and also in Slavery and British Society 1776-1846 (1982), edited by James Walvin. 1 Thomas Clarkson himself raised the point initially when he wrote of the large numbers of people who signed petitions against the slave trade and joined in boycotts of slave-grown sugar. 2 But there the matter rested for more than a hundred years without much attention being paid to it. The earliest works on the American movement, which were published at the turn of the century by A. B. Hart, Alice D. Adams and Mary Locke, did not address the question of mass involvement. The same was true of the standard histories of the British movement by Sir Reginald Coupland, Frank J. Klingberg and William L. Mathieson and of American studies by Gilbert H. Barnes and Dwight L. Dumond, which revived interest in the subject of antislavery among American historians. 3 For the most part, even the succeeding generation of historians of antislavery did not give much thought to the question, but generally accepted as a 'given' that the movements were initiated, led and supported by the middle classes. 4 Aspects which received the most attention were the impact of evangelicalism and the Enlightenment on antislavery attitudes, antislavery as a political issue, and the question of economic determinism. 5 Yet, some spadework on popular support, including that of the working classes, had begun in the 1950s and 1960s. Bernard Mandel's Labor: Free and Slave. Workingmen and the Anti­ Slavery Movement in the United States presented the relationship between abolitionists and workers as largely negative. In Britain several people writing theses explored the topic and found Vll Vlll Introduction decidedly positive connections, especially E. M. Hunt in 'The North of England Agitation for the Abolition of the Slave Trade 1780-1800', and James Walvin in 'English Democratic Societies and Popular Radicalism 1791-1800'. Gloria Clare Taylor pointed out the role of the Scottish churches in disseminating antislavery doctrine to all classes, and more recently Douglas Riach has emphasized the organized attempts of the Dublin abolitionists to reach the working populace. 6 Building on those foundations, several scholars, both British and American, are currently addressing the problem. Richard Blackett has just completed a study of black American abolitionists' missions to Britain in which he reveals the degree to which they attracted working-class audiences in the thousands. James Walvin has carried forward his initial exploration of the subject to the reform campaign of 1832, and Seymour Drescher has contrasted the degree of mass support for the British movement with the lack of it in France. He argues that as long as the antislavery movement remained elitist, slavery 'pursued its unhampered course', but was abolished when abolitionism became 'a vehicle adopted by underrepresented and dynamic social, regional, and religious groups'. 7 Patricia Hollis, on the other hand, has concluded that the British antislavery movement 'failed to forge a working-class constituency', at least prior to George Thompson's Anti-Slavery League of 1846, and that 'anti­ slavery leaders preferred to acquire a more reputable con­ stituency than that of working men'. 8 Alan Kraut, Edward Magdol and John Jentz are among those using quantitative techniques to analyse working-class participation in American antislavery organizations. They have found positive, active involvement to a surprising degree. 9 The obverse side of the question of working-class interest in the antislavery cause is that of abolitionists' concern with working­ class movements. Perhaps it is not surprising how a widespread acceptance of the idea that abolition was largely a conservative, middle-class reform tended to perpetuate the old Dickensian stereotype of emancipationists as a collection of Mrs Jellybys who were oblivious to the fact that exploited white labour at home needed emancipation just as did black slaves in the West Indies or in a far-off section of the United States. Even when historians began to recognize abolitionists as interested in broad-based reform with many interrelated movements, they almost always Introduction IX depicted them, along with reformers in general, as paternalistic, usually evangelical, do-gooders motivated by the need for social control but unhampered by any deep concern for the rights of the working classes. 10 However, Ernest M. Howse in Saints in Politics defended the Clapham Sect as men who though they 'unmis­ takably and inevitably' were men of their own times, yet in many ways were ahead of their times. Frank Thistlethwaite in The Anglo-Amen"can Connection in the Early Nineteenth Century pointed out that eventually the more 'practical spirits' among the abolitionists 'turned their energies toward linking antislavery to broader political issues' including, in Britain, Chartism and the anti-Corn Law fight. 11 In his seminal volumes on the intellectual origins and development of antislavery thought, David Brion Davis, while considering the possibility that antislavery 'bred a new sensitivity to social oppression', emphasizes even more the idea of social control and the degree to which the antislavery movement supported the contemporary social order. He sees this not only as an inadvertent result but also as a conscious aim of the antislavery leaders. In citing abolitionists' defences of the existing social and economic structure, particularly their rationalisations of current labour conditions, he tends to resurrect the old stereotype: 'Abol­ itionists could contemplate a revolutionary change in status precisely because they were not considering the upward mobility of workers, but rather the rise of distant Negroes to the level of humanity.'12 My impression is that they were, consciously, advocating the upward mobility of the working classes but not solely, and often not primarily, from an economic viewpoint. Civil liberties, political rights and educational opportunity were of equal importance in their vision of the just and good society. Davis was, of course, dealing with the early period of abolition (in which support for the status quo may have been truer than I think it was later), and his evidence is drawn to a large extent from the positions of Wilberforce, James Stephen, Granville Sharp and their colleagues of the revolutionary era. As is apparent in my first essay, I disagree with him on Granville Sharp, and believe that one can find many others of the same period who do not fit so neatly into the category of upholders of the status quo. 1 ~ To illustrate, one has only to name Major John Cartwright, Thomas Hardy, Tom Paine, Capel Lofft, Thomas Walker, Christopher Wyvill and Richard Price- all antislavery and political radicals. X Introduction Indeed, Roger Anstey held that even Wilberforce had the potential for 'a more modern syndrome'. Although Wilberforce voted for what Will Cobbett termed the 'gagging and dungeoning' bills, he supported Pitt's abortive reform bill of 1785, subsequent bills to curtail election corruption, and Peel's factory acts of 1802 and 1818. He advocated the expenditure of public as well as private monies to relieve the poor and carry out prison reform.
Recommended publications
  • Class and Ocupation
    Theory and Society, vol. 9, núm. 1, 1980, pp. 177-214. Class and Ocupation. Wright, Erik Olin. Cita: Wright, Erik Olin (1980). Class and Ocupation. Theory and Society, 9 (1) 177-214. Dirección estable: https://www.aacademica.org/erik.olin.wright/53 Acta Académica es un proyecto académico sin fines de lucro enmarcado en la iniciativa de acceso abierto. Acta Académica fue creado para facilitar a investigadores de todo el mundo el compartir su producción académica. Para crear un perfil gratuitamente o acceder a otros trabajos visite: http://www.aacademica.org. 177 CLASS AND OCCUPATION ERIK OLIN WRIGHT Sociologists have generally regarded "class" and "occupation" as occupy- ing essentially the same theoretical terrain. Indeed, the most common operationalization of class is explicitly in terms of a typology of occupa- tions: professional and technical occupations constitute the upper-middle class, other white collar occupations comprise the middle class proper, and manual occupations make up the working class. Even when classes are not seen as defined simply by a typology of occupations, classes are generally viewed as largely determined by occupations. Frank Parkin expresses this view when he writes: "The backbone of the class structure, and indeed of the entire reward system of modern Western society, is the occupational order. Other sources of economic and symbolic advantage do coexist alongside the occupational order, but for the vast majority of the population these tend, at best, to be secondary to those deriving from the division of labor."' While the expression "backbone" is rather vague, nevertheless the basic proposition is clear: the occupational structure fundamentally determines the class structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Middle Class
    Inside the Middle Class: Bad Times Hit the Good Life FOR RELEASE WEDNESDAY APRIL 9, 2008 12:00PM EDT Paul Taylor, Project Director Rich Morin, Senior Editor D'Vera Cohn, Senior Writer Richard Fry, Senior Researcher Rakesh Kochhar, Senior Researcher April Clark, Research Associate MEDIA INQUIRIES CONTACT: Pew Research Center 202 419 4372 http://pewresearch.org ii Table of Contents Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Overview……………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Section One – A Self-Portrait 1. The Middle Class Defines Itself ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..28 2. The Middle Class Squeeze………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..…….36 3. Middle Class Finances ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….……………………..47 4. Middle Class Priorities and Values………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….53 5. Middle Class Jobs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….65 6. Middle Class Politics…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………71 About the Pew Social and Demographic Trends Project ……………………………………………………….…………………………….78 Questionnaire and topline …………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………..79 Section Two – A Statistical Portrait 7. Middle Income Demography, 1970-2006…………………………………………………………………………………………………………110 8. Trends in Income, Expenditures, Wealth and Debt………………………………………..…………………………………………….140 Section Two Appendix ……………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………..163
    [Show full text]
  • English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform
    English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform The Library of Sir Geoffrey Bindman, QC. Part I. BERNARD QUARITCH LTD MMXX BERNARD QUARITCH LTD 36 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4JH tel.: +44 (0)20 7297 4888 fax: +44 (0)20 7297 4866 email: [email protected] / [email protected] web: www.quaritch.com Bankers: Barclays Bank PLC 1 Churchill Place London E14 5HP Sort code: 20-65-90 Account number: 10511722 Swift code: BUKBGB22 Sterling account: IBAN: GB71 BUKB 2065 9010 5117 22 Euro account: IBAN: GB03 BUKB 2065 9045 4470 11 U.S. Dollar account: IBAN: GB19 BUKB 2065 9063 9924 44 VAT number: GB 322 4543 31 Front cover: from item 106 (Gillray) Rear cover: from item 281 (Peterloo Massacre) Opposite: from item 276 (‘Martial’) List 2020/1 Introduction My father qualified in medicine at Durham University in 1926 and practised in Gateshead on Tyne for the next 43 years – excluding 6 years absence on war service from 1939 to 1945. From his student days he had been an avid book collector. He formed relationships with antiquarian booksellers throughout the north of England. His interests were eclectic but focused on English literature of the 17th and 18th centuries. Several of my father’s books have survived in the present collection. During childhood I paid little attention to his books but in later years I too became a collector. During the war I was evacuated to the Lake District and my school in Keswick incorporated Greta Hall, where Coleridge lived with Robert Southey and his family. So from an early age the Lake Poets were a significant part of my life and a focus of my book collecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Cobden, Educationist, Economist
    RICHARD COBDEN, EDUCATIONIST, ECONOMIST AND STATESMAN. BY PETER NELSON FARRAR M.A. (oxoN), M.A. (LVPL). THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD. Division of Education, June 1987. ii CONTENTS Page Ref. Summary iv Abbreviations vi Photographs vii Preface and Acknowledgements viii Part I. An Analysis of Cobden's Ideas and the Formative Influences. Chapter 1. An introductory analysis of Cobden's social philosophy and political activities. 1, 18 2. Cobden's character and formative years. 21, 39 3. Cobden's religious, moral and educa- tional philosophy. 41, 63 4. Cobden's approach to economics. 65, 81 Part II. Thought and Action 1835-1865. 5. The pen of "a Manchester manufacturer". 85, 98 6. Education for the people of Sabden and Chorley. 100, 120 7. Awakening Manchester 1835-1836 123, 147 8. The establishment of the Manchester Society for Promoting National Education. 152, 173 9. Educating the working class: schools and lyceums. 177, 195 10. "The education of 17 millions" the Anti-Corn Law League. 199, 231 11. Cobden and Frederic Bastiat: defining the economics of a consumer society. 238, 264 12. Amid contending ideals of national education 1843-1850. 269, 294 13. Guiding the National Public School Association 1850-1854. 298, 330 14. The Manchester Model Secular School. 336, 353 15. Cobden's last bid for a national education 1855-57. 355, 387 iii Page Ref. 16. The schooling of Richard Cobden junior. 391, 403 17. Newspapers for the millions. 404, 435 18. Investing in a future civilisation: the land development of the Illinois Central Railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Class the Concept of the Lumpenproletariat
    The Dangerous Class The Concept of the Lumpenproletariat Marx and Engels’ concept of the “lumpenproletariat,” or underclass (an anglicized, politically neutral term), appears in The Communist Manifesto and other writings. It refers to “the dangerous class, the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society,” whose lowly status made its residents potential tools of the capitalists against the working class. Surprisingly, no one has made a substantial study of the lumpenproletariat in Marxist thought until now. Clyde Barrow argues that recent discussions about the downward spiral of the American white working class (“its main problem is that it is not working”) have reactivated the concept of the lumpenproletariat even among arguments that it is a term so ill-defined as to not be theoretical. Using techniques from etymology, lexicology, and translation, Barrow brings analytical coherence to the concept of the lumpenproletariat, revealing it to be an inherent component of Marx and Engels’ analysis of the historical origins of capitalism. However, a proletariat that is destined to decay into an underclass may pose insurmountable obstacles to a theory of revolutionary agency in post-industrial capitalism. The Concept of the Lumpenproletariat is the first comprehensive analysis of the concept of the lumpenproletariat in Marxist political theory. Clyde Barrow excavates and analyzes the use of this term from its introduction by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels in The German Ideology (1846) and Save 30% at The Communist Manifesto (1848) through the central role of the relative surplus population in Post-Marxist political theory. He argues that when press.umich.edu organized by a strong man—whether a Bonaparte, a Mussolini, or a with promotion code Trump—the lumpenproletariat gravitates toward a parasitic and violent UMLUMPEN lumpen-state created in its own image, and such a state primarily serves the interests of the equally parasitic finance aristocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Class: the Concept of the Lumpenproletariat
    Review The dangerous class: The concept of the lumpenproletariat Clyde W. Barrow, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2020, xii+196pp., ISBN: 978-0472132249 Contemporary Political Theory (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00487-9 An oft-cited description of the lumpenproletariat comes from Marx’s The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. The Parisian lumpenproletariat that Louis Bonaparte recruited during the French class struggles of 1848–1851 in order to defeat the proletariat and ultimately to seize state power consisted of the following: Alongside decayed roue´s with dubious means of subsistence and of dubious origin, alongside ruined and adventurous offshoots of the bourgeoisie, were vagabonds, discharged soldiers, discharged jailbirds, escaped galley slaves, swindlers, mountebanks, lazzaroni, pickpockets, tricksters, gamblers, ma- quereaus, brothel keepers, porters, literati, organ grinders, ragpickers, knife grinders, tinkers, beggars – in short, the whole indefinite, disintegrated mass, thrown hither and thither, which the French call la bohe`me (1963: 75). As self-interested hustlers whose services are for sale to the highest bidder, the lumpenproletariat – a term Marx and Engels created – is typically co-opted, as Bonaparte demonstrates, by reactionary movements. However, Marx’s taxonomy indicates the difficulty of locating a synthesized and explanatory definition for a term presented here as an ‘indefinite’ alterity with no clear framework of composition. The term has seemed, to some commentators, incoherent or reflective of scorn toward the disreputable or poor (Bussard, 1987; Draper, 1972; Hardt and Negri, 2004). Others – typically literary and cultural critics (Stallybrass, 1990; Mills, 2017) – have approached it as the discursive trace of a complex social scene that escapes full schematization by class relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Class, and Slavery During the American Civil
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works Title Marx’s Intertwining of Race and Class During the Civil War in the U.S. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6238s7h2 Journal Journal of Classical Sociology, 17(1) Author Anderson, Kevin Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Marx’s Intertwining of Race and Class During the Civil War in the U.S. Kevin B. Anderson, University of California, Santa Barbara [author’s last version of article published in Journal of Classical Sociology 17:1 (2017), pp. 24-36] As the U.S. marked the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, some attention was given to African-American resistance to slavery and to the northern radical abolitionists. Increasingly, it was admitted, even in the South, that the Confederacy’s supposedly “noble cause” was based upon the defense of slavery. Yet to this day U.S. public opinion continues to deny the race and class dimensions of the war. There is also a denial, sometimes even among critical sociologists, of the war’s revolutionary implications, not only for African-Americans, but also for white labor and for the U.S. economic and political system as a whole. And there is still greater ignorance of the fact that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote extensively on the dialectics of race and class in the American Civil War, something I have tried to remedy in my recent book, Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies. Marx on Ireland: Class, Ethnicity, and National Liberation Sometimes, as I have tried to show in Marx at the Margins, Marx conceptualized the pathway to class-consciousness and to socialist revolution as direct rather than indirect.
    [Show full text]
  • Keywords—Marxism 101 Session 1 Bourgeoisie
    Keywords—Marxism 101 Session 1 Bourgeoisie: the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour. Capital: an asset (including money) owned by an individual as wealth used to realize a fnancial proft, and to create additional wealth. Capital exists within the process of economic exchange and grows out of the process of circulation. Capital is the basis of the economic system of capitalism. Capitalism: a mode of production in which capital in its various forms is the principal means of production. Capital can take the form of money or credit for the purchase of labour power and materials of production; of physical machinery; or of stocks of fnished goods or work in progress. Whatever the form, it is the private ownership of capital in the hands of the class of capitalists to the exclusion of the mass of the population. Class: social stratifcation defned by a person's relationship to the means of production. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/Pyramid_of_Capitalist_System.png Class struggle: an antagonism that exists within a society, catalyzed by competing socioeconomic interests and central to revolutionary change. Communism: 1) a political movement of the working class in capitalist society, committed to the abolition of capitalism 2) a form of society which the working class, through its struggle, would bring into existence through abolition of classes and of the capitalist division of labor. Dictatorship of the Proletariat: the idea that the proletariat (the working class) has control over political power in the process of changing the ownership of the means of production from private to collective ownership as part of a socialist transition to communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Everywhere and All at Once: Transitioning to Free Labor Across the British Empire, 1837­1838
    Reforming everywhere and all at once: transitioning to free labor across the British empire, 1837-1838 Article (Accepted Version) Boehme, Kate, Mitchell, Peter and Lester, Alan (2018) Reforming everywhere and all at once: transitioning to free labor across the British empire, 1837-1838. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 60 (3). pp. 688-718. ISSN 0010-4175 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/68393/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk 1 Reforming Everywhere and All at Once: Transitioning to Free Labor Across the British Empire, 1837-1838 Kate Boehme, Peter Mitchell and Alan Lester Abstract In late 1837 and early 1838 the British imperial government was preparing for an empire-wide transition from bonded to nominally free labor.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Sturge and the Anti-Slavery Society
    Library of Birmingham Archives & Collections JOSPEH STURGE AND THE ANTI SLAVERY SOCIETY Birmingham is perhaps less obviously a centre of the slave trade than cities such as Liverpool and Bristol. However, with its strong manufacturing base, Birmingham was well equipped to provide goods for sale in West Africa and the Caribbean. Inevitably, many local businesses profited from this 'triangular' trade route; but it was just as inevitable that a city famous for non-conformity and dissent should also become a centre for the campaigns of the abolitionists. One of the leading activists was Joseph Sturge (1793-1859). Born in 1793 in Gloucestershire, Sturge moved to Birmingham in 1822 following the collapse of his company. Starting again with a warehouse and tiny office, he was soon diversifying into other areas such as railways and canals. However, after establishing himself Sturge left much of the day-to-day work to his partner and brother Charles, preferring to concentrate on more philanthropic pursuits. Sturge became involved with the local Anti-Slavery Society soon after his arrival in Birmingham, and became secretary in 1826. He quickly lost patience with the more cautious character of the Society's London leadership, arguing instead for more public meetings and agitation of a wider kind. 'The people must emancipate the slaves,' was Sturge's argument, 'for the Government never will.' The campaigns by the Anti-Slavery Society and other groups resulted in the 1833 Emancipation Act, which abolished slavery and replaced it with a system of apprenticeship. Visiting the Caribbean in 1836, Sturge saw first hand that little had changed, and that working conditions were as harsh as ever.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of an Anti-Slavery Society
    Southeastern University FireScholars Selected Honors Theses 4-2015 Quakers and Slavery: The evelopmeD nt of an Anti- Slavery Society Ryan P. Murray Southeastern University - Lakeland Follow this and additional works at: http://firescholars.seu.edu/honors Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Murray, Ryan P., "Quakers and Slavery: The eD velopment of an Anti-Slavery Society" (2015). Selected Honors Theses. Paper 11. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by FireScholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Selected Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of FireScholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quakers and Slavery: The Development of an Anti-Slavery Society Ryan P. Murray Southeastern University Honors Program Undergraduate Thesis April 1, 2015 Murray Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Review of Literature……………………………………………………………………………....4 Chapter One: The Pro-Slavery Era and the Later Development of Anti-Slavery Sentiments…...13 Chapter Two: The Spread of Anti-Slavery Sentiments, John Woolman………………………....21 Chapter Three: The Spread of Anti-Slavery Sentiments, Anthony Benezet……………….…….37 Chapter Four: The Anti-Slavery Era……………………………………………………….…….51 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….....61 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..63 2 Murray Introduction In the late 1640s and early 1650s, in the midst of the English Civil War, a British shoemaker brought together some fellow dissenters to create the Religious Society of Friends. This sect of Christianity formed itself on the basis that any person could know and communicate with God because of an “Inner Light” that dwelt within all people. In 1668, a young aristocrat named William Penn joined the Society which had become known collectively as the Quakers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of the English Corresponding Societies 1792-95
    ‘A curious mixture of the old and the new’? The nature of the English Corresponding Societies 1792-95. by Robin John Chatterton A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Arts by Research. Department of History, College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham, May 2019. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis relates to the British Corresponding Societies in the form they took between 1792 and 1795. It draws on government papers, trial transcripts, correspondence, public statements, memoirs and contemporary biography. The aim is to revisit the historiographical debate regarding the societies’ nature, held largely between 1963 and 2000, which focused on the influence on the societies of 1780s’ gentlemanly reformism which sought to retrieve lost, constitutional rights, and the democratic ideologies of Thomas Paine and the French Revolution which sought to introduce new natural rights. The thesis takes a wider perspective than earlier historiography by considering how the societies organised and campaigned, and the nature of their personal relationships with their political influences, as well as assessing the content of their writings.
    [Show full text]