DOCSLIB.ORG

Making Purpose Pay: Inspiring Sustainable Living

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making Purpose Pay: Inspiring Sustainable Living MAKING PURPOSE PAY INSPIRING SUSTAINABLE LIVING PURPOSE OR SUSTAINABILITY: CONTENTS WHAT’S IN A NAME? There is a lot of talk today about brands with purpose, or sustainable brands, 03 A CONVERSATION WITH KEITH WEED or meaningful brands. The number of descriptions people use is exceeded only by the different interpretations people give them. Some simply mean brands that support a charity or, say, use ‘natural’ ingredients. At the other SUSTAINABLE 05 MAKING PURPOSE PAY: FAD OR FUTURE? extreme, people set up whole companies whose sole purpose is to ‘do good’. With so many terms in use, it helps to put some definition behind LIVING BRANDS the terminology. 09 GAINING INSIGHTS, DISPELLING MYTHS make a positive At Unilever we are in the business of helping people to live well and live within the natural limits of the planet, so we talk about ‘sustainable living’ difference to 11 FIVE GOLDEN RULES and ‘sustainable living brands’. For us that means helping to bring about society and our greater social equity and inclusiveness and helping people to: company purpose 22 DOVE: NURTURING SELF-ESTEEM • improve their health, nutrition and wellbeing • reduce their environmental impacts 24 BEN & JERRY’S: COMMITTED TO SOCIAL CHANGE • choose products that are better for them, society and the environment. SUSTAINABLE LIVING 26 SUSTAINABLE LIVING BRANDS GROW FASTER Purpose and product PURPOSE The concept of ‘purpose-driven’ brands is not new. Among our own brands, Lifebuoy and Ben & Jerry’s have had a social or environmental 28 GLOSSARY OF SUSTAINABILITY TERMS purpose at their heart since they were founded. But in today’s complex and interconnected world, having a powerful purpose is not enough. Brands must look at their impacts up and down the value chain and across the 29 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS public domain. For example, they cannot do social good while harming SUSTAINABLE LIVING the planet or improve the lives of consumers while ignoring the working conditions of the people who make them. BRANDS That is why our definition of a sustainable living brand is one that: • has a clear purpose that, over time, helps to tackle a social or environmental issue or cause SUSTAINABLE LIVING • produces products that reduce their environmental footprint and/or PRODUCTS improve health and wellbeing or livelihoods. In Unilever that means sustainable living brands make a positive difference to society and, ultimately, to our company purpose: Making sustainable living commonplace. For a full glossary of sustainability terms, see page 28 1 A CONVERSATION WITH KEITH WEED, CHIEF MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER DOES Q: Is the idea of brands with a purpose just brands that understand them and speak to Q: Why are you sharing your research and the latest fad or is it here to stay? their concerns. Having a sustainable living insights – isn’t this competitive information? purpose enables brands to connect with A: Brands having a sustainable living them at a deeper, emotional level. A: When we launched the Unilever purpose is not a new idea. Unilever’s British Sustainable Living Plan in 2010 we said that PURPOSE founder, William Lever, launched Sunlight Q: How do you encourage more people to if we went down the path of creating a new, soap in 1880 with the purpose of making buy these brands? sustainable business model but only a few cleanliness commonplace, and there have other companies joined us, we would have been many more examples over the years. A: The main drivers of sustainable failed. So we have committed to helping What makes it particularly relevant now is purchasing are trust and social norms. other brands and businesses by sharing that the moral case for business to help fix Consumers need to trust the people who what we have learned about sustainable the fault lines in society and the business make the product and they need to feel it is living in the hope of inspiring others to PAY? case for doing so are aligned. a purchase that is valued by the people they do the same. Make no mistake, we see care about. But they don’t want to pay more competitive advantage in being a first mover. Q: What makes you so sure consumers or sacrifice performance. They want great But we also believe that a rising tide lifts all really want sustainable living brands? products that are good value for money and boats, so we want to encourage others to sustainable. That doesn’t mean they have to join us on our journey. A: We have two strong pieces of evidence. be new brands. They want the brands they Firstly, our own sustainable living brands already know and love to be sustainable. Q: What’s this booklet about and what’s in it grew 50% faster than the rest of our for the marketing world? business and accounted for more than 60% of our growth in 2016. Secondly, research A: In this booklet, we share the results we conducted that asked consumers about of our Making Purpose Pay research, the their attitudes to sustainable living and Research has shown insights it has given us, the lessons we have compared what they said against their till learned from integrating sustainability into receipts, showed that over 50% of people our leading brands and the work we have now buy or want to buy brands that are more been doing to measure their impact on sustainable and we expect this to grow. our business. I believe sustainable living brands represent a huge opportunity for the Q: Why do you think consumers want marketing world to build strong, sustainable brands with a sustainable living purpose? OVER 50% growth and enduring consumer relationships of people now want to in an increasingly resource-constrained, A: As marketers, we know that the best transparent and untrusting world. It’s also businesses understand their consumers buy brands that are more a wonderful opportunity for marketing to intimately as individuals. They are not just sustainable rediscover its original, noble purpose of a pair of armpits looking for deodorant developing brands that are good for business or a head of hair looking for shampoo, and good for the world, and reposition our but real people with real lives and real profession as a powerful driver of positive anxieties. People want to engage with social change. Keith Weed, Unilever’s Chief Marketing & Communications Officer 2 3 MAKING PURPOSE PAY: FAD OR FUTURE? Brands with purpose or sustainable brands may be talked about a lot but, so far, evidence that they contribute to growth or increase trust has been thin on the ground. Unsurprisingly, many brand specialists Most surveys that have appeared measure households were interviewed across two and marketers remain to be convinced. consumer attitudes or claimed behaviour. different categories (tea and laundry) in two Do such brands, whatever they are called, These show that consumers say they want markets (Turkey, United Kingdom). Data really make a meaningful difference? Do to buy brands whose causes they believe in was gathered on their general and category consumers really care about sustainability? and claim to prefer products that in some sustainability beliefs and behaviours. Over 50 Does it drive market penetration or brand way are better for the environment. “But, questions were asked covering a wide range loyalty? And, crucially, does having a as we all know, people don’t always do what of social and environmental topics, such as purpose lead to increased sales? they say or say what they do,” says Sue, “and recycling, travel, water usage, energy saving, there has always appeared to be a big gap treatment of workers, opportunities for “At Unilever we have put a lot of effort and between what consumers reply when asked women, responsibility for taking action, and reputational capital behind our big bet that and what they actually do at the point of shopping for Fairtrade products. consumers want their favourite brands purchase.” to be more than just responsible and will These were mapped against what increasingly prefer brands that connect Other surveys, notably by Nielsen and they actually bought and the reasons they with their personal values and concerns,” the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), have gave for their purchase decisions. This explains Unilever’s EVP, Global Sustainable measured sales. An analysis of products study was then added to by quantitative Business & Communications, Sue Garrard. in the United States in 2014 showed that research with Europanel in Brazil, India and “Or, to put it more simply, people want 16.5% of US consumer goods were what the United States on attitudes and beliefs to brands to do more good, not just do less bad. BCG called ‘responsible products’ and ensure our findings were globally relevant, that they were growing by 9% each year, and with qualitative research in the UK, “Consumers are becoming much more outpacing the market. At that rate of growth, Turkey and Brazil by consumer and cultural aware of the positive difference brands can they predicted these products would account insight agency Flamingo, to understand make to social and environmental issues for 70% of total grocery growth in US and the deeper drivers behind the attitudes and also the difference they themselves Europe by 2019. and purchasing behaviours we observed can make through their everyday shopping quantitatively. Across the study, 20,000 choices. This has been fuelled by the Until now research has been based either on people were interviewed. growth in social media and the opportunity consumer attitudes and reported behaviour, it provides for people to have closer, more or on measured sales behaviour. “So we intimate connections with brands. This in decided it was time to carry out bespoke turn creates a growing need for brands research to connect these two types to generate content that resonates with of research at the consumer level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unilever Trading Statement First Quarter 2018 a Good
    UNILEVER TRADING STATEMENT FIRST QUARTER 2018 A GOOD START WITH STRONG VOLUME GROWTH Performance highlights Underlying performance GAAP measures vs 2017 vs 2017 Underlying sales growth (USG)(a) 3.4% Turnover €12.6bn (5.2)% USG excluding spreads(a) 3.7% Turnover excluding spreads €11.9bn (5.2)% Quarterly dividend payable in June 2018 €0.3872 per share (a) These amounts do not include any Q1 price growth in Venezuela. See page 5 for further details. • Underlying sales growth excluding spreads 3.7% with volume 3.6% and price 0.1% • Emerging markets underlying sales growth 5.1% with volume 4.3% and price 0.8% • Share buy-back programme of up to €6 billion to start in May 2018 • Quarterly dividend raised 8% to €0.3872 per share Paul Polman: Chief Executive Officer statement “The first quarter demonstrates another good volume-driven performance across all three Divisions. The broad-based growth, including over 4% volume growth in emerging markets, shows that the ‘Connected 4 Growth’ programme is working and enhancing our long-term compounding growth model. We are further improving the quality and speed of our global and local innovation as a result of a more agile, consumer-facing organisation. At the same time, we are maintaining strong delivery from our savings programmes and expecting to complete the exit from spreads in the middle of the year. For the full year, we continue to expect underlying sales growth in the 3% - 5% range and an improvement in underlying operating margin and cash flow that keep us on track for our 2020 goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever (Breyer's & Good Humor) Using Genetical
    Unilever (Breyer’s & Good Humor) Using Genetical by Paris Reidhead more and more consumers want to choose unadulterated food, it’s disappoint- Summary: ing to see Unilever investing in this unnecessary development in overly Genetically-modified fish proteins in Breyer’s Ice Cream processed food.” Unilever, the British-Dutch global consumer marketing products giant, is On July 4, 2006, Prof. Cummins wrote in the GM Watch website: the largest producer of ice cream and frozen novelties in the U.S. Unilever’s (http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6706) brands sold in the U.S. include Breyer’s ice cream, Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, that Unilever has been selling GM ice cream in the U.S., with FDA approval. Klondike ice cream bars, and Popsicle products. Unilever’s Good Humor is a major producer of ice cream bars and other frozen Specifically: Breyer’s Light Double-Churned, Extra Creamy Creamy novelty products mainly targeted to young children. The applications for approval Chocolate ice cream, as well as a Good Humor ice cream novelty bar, contain of GM ice cream have all ignored the impact of GM ice cream on children. the genetically-modified fish “antifreeze” proteins. In the FDA GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) application, Unilever’s scientists have patented, and the company is using ice cream Unilever’s main focus of safety was the allergenicity of the ice structuring pro- products sold in the U.S., Australia and New Zealand, “antifreeze” protein sub- tein from the pout fish. The main test was to examine effect of the ice structur- stances from the blood of the ocean pout (a polar ocean species).
    [Show full text]
  • Church & Dwight Co., Inc
    cd_2004_an_pdf_cov.qxd 5/3/05 5:16 PM Page 1 2004 CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. ® Annual Report cd_2004_an_pdf_cov.qxd 5/3/05 5:16 PM Page 2 Financial Highlights Dollars in millions, except per share data 2004 2003 CHANGE SALES $1,462 $1,057 +38% INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 172 112 +54% NET INCOME 89 81 +10% NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED 1.36 1.28 +6% DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 0.23 0.21 +10% Additional Information COMBINED SALES (1) (2) $1,702 $1,508 +13% ADJUSTED NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED(1) (3) 1.66 1.33 +25% (1) These are non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures of performance. See notes 2 and 3 for the reconciliations of the non-GAAP numbers to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. (2) Includes Armkel sales of $193 million and $411 million for 2004 and 2003, respectively, and Other Equity Affiliates sales of $56 million and $49 million for 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excludes intercompany sales of $9 million for both 2004 and 2003. Management believes this information is useful to investors because the businesses of the Company and its unconsolidated equity investees are managed on a combined basis, and management uses combined performance measures to analyze performance and develop financial objectives. Moreover, since the results of operations of the former Armkel business have been included in Church & Dwight's consolidated statement of income beginning on May 29, 2004, the information enhances comparability over the relevant period. (3) Excludes, in 2004, an accounting charge of $0.10 per share related to the acquisition of the 50% interest in Armkel that the Company did not previously own, as well as charges of $0.20 per share related to the early redemption of debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Efficiency Development in Distribution and Damage Control”
    Internship report On “Logistics Efficiency Development in Distribution and Damage Control” Prepared For: Ms. Mahtab Faruqui Senior Lecturer BRAC Business School BRAC University. Prepared By: Irfan Rafique ID: 08104001 BRAC Business School BRAC University. Date: 23rd January, 2012. Letter of transmittal January 23rd, 2012 Ms. Mahtab Faruqui Senior Lecturer BRAC Business School BRAC University. Subject: Submission of internship report. Dear Madam, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you for the guidance and support you have provided me during the course of this report. I also want to express deep gratuities to Mr. Rezwan Hamid, Territory manager, Tejgoan territory for his cooperation and supervision. In this report this report I tried my level best to provide authentic information. I also tried to reflect my experience driven learning and findings. I request you to excuse me for any mistake despite my best effort. I also appreciate if you enlighten me with your thoughts and views regarding the report. Also, if you wish to enquire about any aspect of my report, I would gladly answer your questions. Yours Sincerely, Irfan Rafique ID: 08104001 BRAC Business School BRAC University ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prosperous conclusion of any course requires support from various personal and I was fortunate to have support, direction and supervision in every aspect from my teacher, Unilever officials and friends. I would also like to express my cordial thanks and gratitude to my supervisor of internship program Ms. Mahtab Faruqui, senior lecturer for farm encouragement as well as guidance in preparing this report. I acknowledge my gratitude to Mr. Rezwan Hamid for his guidance, cooperation and help.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies That Do Test on Animals
    COMPANIES THAT DO TEST ON ANIMALS Frequently Asked Questions Why are these companies included on the 'Do Test' list? The following companies manufacture products that ARE tested on animals. Those marked with a are currently observing a moratorium (i.e., current suspension of) on animal testing. Please encourage them to announce a permanent ban. Listed in parentheses are examples of products manufactured by either the company listed or, if applicable, its parent company. For a complete listing of products manufactured by a company on this list, please visit the company's Web site or contact the company directly for more information. Companies on this list may manufacture individual lines of products without animal testing (e.g., Clairol claims that its Herbal Essences line is not animal-tested). They have not, however, eliminated animal testing from their entire line of cosmetics and household products. Similarly, companies on this list may make some products, such as pharmaceuticals, that are required by law to be tested on animals. However, the reason for these companies' inclusion on the list is not the animal testing that they conduct that is required by law, but rather the animal testing (of personal-care and household products) that is not required by law. What can be done about animal tests required by law? Although animal testing of pharmaceuticals and certain chemicals is still mandated by law, the arguments against using animals in cosmetics testing are still valid when applied to the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. These industries are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, respectively, and it is the responsibility of the companies that kill animals in order to bring their products to market to convince the regulatory agencies that there is a better way to determine product safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line
    Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line: DATE Event Description 4th Origins of ice cream being made… China, Persians faloodeh, Nero in Rome (62 AD) century BC 15th Spanish, Italian royalty and wealthy store mountain ice in pits for summer use Century 16th Ice Cream breakthrough is when Italians learn to make ice by immersing a bucket of Century water in snow and adding potassium nitrate… later just use common salt. 1700s Jefferson and Washington In US serving ice cream 1776 First US ice cream parlor in New York City and American colonists first to use the term ice cream 1832 Augustus Jackson (Black) in Philadelphia adds salt to lower temp. White House chef to a catering business. 1846 Nancy Johnson patented hand-crank freezer 1848 William Young patents an ice cream freezer 1851 Jacob Fussell in Seven Valleys, Pennsylvania established the first large-scale commercial ice cream plant… moved to Baltimore 1870s Development of Industrial Refrigeration by German engineer Carl von Linde 1904 Walk away edible cone at the St Louis World’s Fair 1906 William Dreyer made his first frozen dessert to celebrate his German ship's arrival in America. Made Ice Cream in New York then moves to Northern California began 20 year apprenticeship with ice cream makers like National Ice Cream Company and Peerless Ice Cream. 1921 Dreyer opens own ice creamery in Visalia and one first prize at Pacific Slope Dairy Show. 1920s – Dreyer taught ice cream courses at the University of California and served as an officer in 1930s the California Dairy Industries Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Annual Report 1994
    Annual Review 1994 And Summary Financial Statement English Version in Childers Unilever Contents Directors’ Report Summary Financial Statement 1 Financial Highlights 33 Introduction 2 Chairmen’s Statement 33 Dividends 4 Business Overview 33 Statement from the Auditors 12 Review of Operations 34 Summary Consolidated Accounts 26 Financial Review 29 Organisation 36 Additional Information 30 Directors & Advisory Directors Financial Highlights 1994 1993 % Change % Change at constant atwrrent a* cOnSt.3nf exchange rates exchange rates exchange rates Results (Fl. million) Turnover 82 590 83 641 77 626 6 8 Operating profit 7 012 7 107 5 397 30 32 Operating profit before excepttonal items 7 294 6 763 6 8 Exceptional items (187) (1 366) Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 6 634 6 700 5 367 24 25 Net profit 4 339 4 362 3 612 20 21 Net profit before exceptional items 4 372 4 406 4 271 -~mpy~21 E Key ratios Operating margin before exceptional items (%) 8.7 8.7 Net profit margin before exceptional items (%) 5.3 5.5 Return on capital employed (%) 16.7 15.7 Net gearing (%) 22.7 24.8 Net interest cover (times) 12.2 12.8 Combined earnings per share Guilders per Fl. 4 of ordinary capital 15.52 12.90 20 Pence per 5p of ordinary capital 83.59 69.45 20 Ordinary dividends Guilders per Fl. 4 of ordinary capital 6.19 5.88 5 Pence per 5p of ordinary capital 26.81 25.03 7 Fluctuations in exchange rates can have a significant effect on Unilever’s reported results.
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Annual Report & Accounts
    DISCLAIMER This is a PDF version of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018 and is an exact copy of the document filed with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Certain sections of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018 have been audited. These are on pages 75 to 127 and the Guarantor Statements on pages 158 to 162. The maintenance and integrity of the Unilever website is the responsibility of the Directors; the work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of these matters. Accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially placed on the website. Legislation in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. Except where you are a shareholder, this material is provided for information purposes only and is not, in particular, intended to confer any legal rights on you. This Annual Report on Form 20-F does not constitute an invitation to invest in Unilever shares. Any decisions you make in reliance on this information are solely your responsibility. The information is given as of the dates specified, is not updated, and any forward-looking statements are made subject to the reservations specified in the cautionary statement on the inside back cover of the Annual Report on Form 20-F 2018. Unilever accepts no responsibility for any information on other websites that may be accessed from this site by hyperlinks. MAKING SUSTAINABLE LIVING COMMONPLACE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTENTS FORM 20-F 2018 Strategic Report ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Top Dairy Processors in the Dairy 100
    DAIRY 100 In Millions Code to Type: C=Cooperative; Pr=Privately-held company; Pu=Publicly-traded company; S=Subsidiary; An asterisk on a sales figure denotes a Dairy Foods estimate. SALES SALES COMPANY LOCATION DAIRY EXECUTIVE TYPE PARENT COMPANY, LOCATION FY END ‘11 ‘10 1. Dean Foods Co. Dallas, TX Gregg Engles, Chairman/CEO Pu 12/31/2011 $12,700 $12,123 Brands: Alpro (Europe), Alta Dena, Arctic Splash, Atlanta Dairies, Barbers, Barbe’s, Berkeley Farms, Broughton, Borden (licensed brand), Brown Cow, Brown’s Dairy, Bud’s Ice Cream, Chug, Country Charm, Country Churn, Country Delite, Country Fresh, Country Love, Creamland, Dairy Fresh, Dean’s, Dipzz, Fieldcrest, Foremost (licensed brand), Friendship, Gandy’s, Garelick Farms, Hershey’s (licensed brand), Horizon Organic, Hygeia, International Delight, Jilbert, Knudsen (licensed brand), LAND O LAKES (licensed brand), Land-O-Sun & design, Lehigh Valley Dairy Farms, Liberty, Louis Trauth Dairy Inc, Maplehurst, Mayfield, McArthur, Meadow Brook, Meadow Gold, Mile High Ice Cream, Model Dairy, Morning Glory, Nature’s Pride, Nurture, Nutty Buddy, Oak Farms, Over the Moon, Pet (licensed brand), Pog (licensed brand), Price’s, Provamel (Europe), Purity, Reiter, Robinson, Saunders, Schenkel’s All*Star, Schepps, Shenandoah’s Pride, Silk, Silk Pure Almond, Silk Pure Coconut, Stok, Stroh’s, Swiss Dairy, Swiss Premium, Trumoo, T.GLee, Tuscan, Turtle Tracks, Verifine, Viva. Products: Milk, cultured dairy, juice/drinks, water, creamers, whipping cream, ice cream mix, ice cream novelties. Plants: Fresh Dairy
    [Show full text]
  • Case Analysis
    Case Analysis COMPETING THROUGH SUSTAINABILITY Introduction Consumer goods giant Unilever is the result of a 1927 merger between a Dutch butter company and an English soap company that encountered each other in the commodities market due to their common use of palm oil. The companies diversified into each other’s product markets becoming competitors before merging to establish Unilever in 1930. Unilever’s founding philosophy held that companies can only prosper if they conduct business ethically and responsibly, which was coined: “doing well by doing good.” Unilever gained success through fast-growing local markets during the postwar consumer boom. However, it overdiversified leading to decreased profits and an ensuing stagnancy that lasted throughout the 1990s. In 2004, Unilever issued its first profit warning amidst deteriorating market share. In 2009, the company brought in its first external CEO, Paul Polman, who committed to doubling revenues while reducing environmental footprint and increasing societal impact. In 2010, Polman introduced a bold sustainability-focused transformational strategy called Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (USLP). The highly measurable plan set three goals to reach by 2020: improve the wellbeing of a billion people, halve its environmental footprint, and enhance life for everyone in its value chain. Problem Statement Polman announced 2014 results, which were largely positive. The company grew ahead of slowing worldwide markets, saw internal growth for its fifth consecutive year, and produced an 18% increase in shareholder returns. USLP program results were also strong with 7 of 9 pillars remaining on track and only 7 of 67 metrics being off track. However, Polman warned of “strong headwinds” created by external factors beyond Unilever’s control, such as stalling developed markets and slowing emerging markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Certification the Following Products the Company Named Below Are Certified Kosher with the Following Certification Requirements
    Letter of Certification The following products the company named below are certified kosher with the following certification requirements. Unilever Ice Cream Code Brand Product Status Requires UKD ID 909 Packerland Drive, P O 84113371 Magnum Almond Dairy COR707290 Box 19007 Breyers BL Creamsicle Dairy COR456463 Green Bay, Wisconsin 84127808 Fruttare Banana Milk Bar Dairy COR716543 UNITED STATES, 543079007 Fruit 84127433 Fruttare Banana Milk Bar Dairy COR870812 Fruit 84127812 Fruttare Banana Milk Bar Dairy COR953832 Fruit 7739701 Breyers Big Bear Sandwich (Single Serve) Dairy COR18821 Novelties Breyers Birthday Blast Dairy COR285799 Expires: November 30 2021 Blends Breyers Breyers Classic Chocolate Dairy COR974651 Blends Explosion 84125809 Breyers Breyers Vanilla Honey Yogurt Dairy COR387107 Rabbi Dovid Rosen 84121991 Creamery Butterscotch Ripple Dairy COR684050 Kashrus Administrator Style Breyers Butterscotch Ripple Ice Cream Dairy COR33532 Cream Style Note: Ice Cream Unauthorized use of the COR symbol is a violation of applicable food labeling statutes and copyright law. 84121990 Breyers CREAMERY STYLE Dairy COR286038 CHOCOLATE Letter # 280973214 October 01, 2021 3200 Dufferin Street #308 | Toronto, ON M6A 3B2 | 416.635.9550 | [email protected] | www.cor.ca Letter of Certification The following products the company named below are certified kosher with the following certification requirements. Unilever Ice Cream Code Brand Product Status Requires UKD ID 909 Packerland Drive, P O 84113936 Breyers Cadbury Caramilk Bar Dairy COR448415 Blends
    [Show full text]
  • In Honor of the 10Th Anniversary of the Skoll World Forum
    Voices on Society The art and science of delivery In honor of the 10th anniversary of the Skoll World Forum COPYRIGHT © 2013 MCKINSEY & COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE COPIED OR REDISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF MCKINSEY & COMPANY. de·liv·ery | di-’li-v(e-)ré The art and science of delivering improvements in health care, education, food security, financial services, and other arenas to the people that need them most—at scale, effectively, efficiently, and sustainably. Visit our website: mckinseyonsociety.com Join the conversation on Twitter: @McKinseySociety 3 | Voices on Society | The art and science of delivery | Contents 05 07 10 10 10 13 15 17 19 21 21 24 24 26 28 28 30 32 35 38 Contents Preface 1. Manage and lead 2. Scale what works 05 Norbert Dörr | McKinsey & Company 10 Kathleen McLaughlin, 24 Beatriz Perez and Guy Wollaert | 07 Sally Osberg | The Skoll Foundation Jens Riese, and Lynn Taliento | The Coca-Cola Company McKinsey & Company 26 Nitin Paranjpe | Hindustan Unilever 13 Tony Blair | African Governance 28 Salman Khan and Jessica Yuen | Initiative Khan Academy 15 Sir Michael Barber | Pearson 30 Michael Schlein | Accion 17 Pravin Gordhan | Minister of 32 Yvette Alberdingk Thijm | Witness finance, Republic of South Africa 19 Dambisa Moyo | Economist and Author 21 Shaina Doar and Jonathan K. Law | McKinsey & Company 4 | Voices on Society | The art and science of delivery | Contents 3. Issue focus: Health and hunger 4. The future of delivery 35 Muhammad Ali Pate | Minister of 53 Jim Yong Kim | World Bank Group state for health, Nigeria 55 André Dua | McKinsey & Company 38 Jamie Oliver | Better Food 57 Karim Khoja | Roshan Foundation 59 Patrick Meier | Qatar Computing 40 Julia Martin | Office of the US Global Research Institute AIDS Coordinator 62 Eoin Daly and Seelan Singham | 42 Andrew Youn | One Acre Fund McKinsey & Company 44 Steve Davis and Anurag Mairal | 64 Richard McGill Murphy and Denielle Sachs | PATH McKinsey & Company 46 Feike Sijbesma | Royal DSM 49 Helene D.
    [Show full text]