Sustainable Development Overview 2009 Creating a Better Future Every Day Contents Highlights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Development Overview 2009 Creating a Better Future Every Day Contents Highlights Sustainable Development Overview 2009 Creating a better future every day Contents Highlights 1 Introduction 2 Our business and brands 4 An overview of our impacts 6 Creating a better future every day 9 Progress on our commitments 10 Health and well- being 11 Nutrition Launched ambitious new vision to double the 14 Hygiene and well- being size of our business while reducing our overall environmental impacts across the entire value chain 17 Sustainable living 18 Sustainable agriculture % 21 Climate change 15 of our palm oil now sourced 24 Water sustainably via GreenPalm certifcates 27 Packaging % 30 Supporting economic 15 of the tea we use globally development now sourced from Rainforest ™ Alliance Certifed farms 34 External commentary 36 Our Sustainable Development Report Reduced environmental impacts of 37 Awards and recognition our manufacturing operations by 41%* for CO2 from energy, 65%* for water use and %* 73 for total waste, measured per tonne of production over 1995-2009 This Overview summarises our most signifcant impacts. Our online Sustainable Lifebuoy promoted Development Report is our principal means of reporting: Global Handwashing Day it sets out our policies and performance on the issues in 23 countries, covered in this Overview reaching millions of people as well as many others. See page 36 44% of our food portfolio now in line www.unilever.com/ sustainability with internationally accepted guidelines for saturated and trans fat, sugar and salt Launched global ‘Brush Day and Night’ campaign with FDI World Dental Federation Food industry sector leader in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Indexes for the 11th year running – the only company ever to have achieved this *2009 data is preliminary – see Footnote, page 35 Introduction 2009 was a good year for Unilever. Despite diffcult economic conditions our growth momentum was strong and we laid many of the foundations needed for the long term. At the same time we continued to serve billions of consumers across the world with products and innovations that help them feel good, look good and get more out of life. A new vision of our volumes. And as a founder member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil 2009 saw the launch of a new vision (RSPO) we are helping to move the industry for Unilever – to double the size of the to sustainable palm oil. We have set our company while reducing our overall impact own target to be 100% sustainably sourced on the environment. The commitment by 2015. presents Unilever with a major challenge. The reduction we are talking about is an It is a similar story in tea. Around 15% of absolute one. It incorporates all our impacts our global volumes of tea now comes from right across the value chain – from the certifed sustainable sources. Commitments sourcing of our raw materials through to like these not only help the environment, but consumer use and disposal of our products. also have a positive impact on the lives of In short, we intend to decouple growth from millions of people. In Kenya alone, 38,000 environmental impact. smallholder tea farmers have achieved Rainforest Alliance certifcation. Again, our target is to be fully sourced with sustainable The starting point tea for our Lipton tea bags by 2015. Where do we start in addressing such In ice cream the challenge is different. a challenge? Here the task is to move to climate-friendly HC refrigerants in the point-of-sale freezer Shared value First, we have to put our own house in cabinets that we own around the world. order. And we are. Over the last 15 years This way of working, which has been the company has signifcantly improved the Ultimately, however, we will not achieve our described as ‘shared value creation’, has eco-effciency of its network of factories. CO2 environmental goals without persuading been at the heart of Unilever’s approach from energy has gone down by 41%*, water consumers to change their behaviour. For since the inception of the business. Today, we by 65%* and total waste by 73%* per tonne many of our products consumers generate are applying it to the challenges of the early of production. We recognise that we have around 70% of the environmental impact. 21st century: climate change, water scarcity, more to do and have the plans to get there. Laundry detergents are a case in point. poverty alleviation and malnutrition to name The temperature and cycle at which the but a few. wash is done have a huge impact on the Of course we have had our share of setbacks Working across the energy and water used. The Cleaner Planet with which we have had to deal. Whether value chain Plan, which is being rolled out across our these were issues with contract labour in Omo, Persil and Surf brands, is a behaviour Pakistan or accusations levelled against some Unilever’s biggest impacts do not come from change programme that educates consumers of our palm oil suppliers, we have tried its own operations. Our 264 factories account on how to do their washing in a resource- to respond to these criticisms quickly and for only a small proportion of our emissions. effcient fashion. transparently. Our biggest effects on the world around us come from the sourcing of raw materials at We report on these matters in this document. one end of the value chain and consumer use Tackling social as well We hope that it provides a balanced account of our products at the other. as environmental issues of how Unilever is addressing the central issue facing companies everywhere – namely how These are issues which we cannot tackle On the social dimension we are also to grow in a genuinely sustainable manner. alone. Together with NGOs, customers making progress. Lifebuoy’s programme to and other partner organisations we have teach children and their families about the programmes and commitments in place importance of handwashing has reached to address them at each stage of the over 133 million people since 2002. Ben and value chain. Jerry’s has announced that it will go Fairtrade. As a food company half our raw materials In India our Shakti distribution network now come from agriculture and forestry. Our employs 45,000 women. They are not only ambition is to purchase all our key crops from making our products more accessible to some sustainable sources. We have already taken of the 800 million people who live in Indian the lead in many areas. In palm oil, we have villages but they provide a livelihood, dignity Paul Polman bought GreenPalm certifcates covering 15% and respect to many families along the way. Chief Executive Offcer 1 Our business and brands On any given day, 2 billion people use our products. This gives us a unique opportunity to help improve their everyday lives. Turnover (millions) Unilever is one of the leading suppliers of With consumers, customers, suppliers and E fast-moving consumer goods with products shareholders on every continent, we describe on sale in over 170 countries. Our strong ourselves as a ‘multi-local multinational’. 39,823 portfolio of foods, home and personal care An important part of the local communities in brands is trusted by consumers the world over. which we operate, we bring our international 32% 30% 38% expertise to the service of people everywhere. Our top 13 brands account for total sales of over €23 billion and our top 25 brands account for nearly 75% of our sales. * Our top 13 brands Leading category positions Savoury Spreads l Axe/Lynx l Hellmann’s l Rexona World Dressings Tea l l l Number 1 Blue Band Knorr Sunsilk Ice cream Mass skin care l l l Deodorants Dove Lipton Surf l l Flora/Becel Lux *Some of our brands World Laundry detergents l l may be marketed under Daily hair care Heartbrand Omo alternative names in Number 2 ice creams certain countries Local Household care strength Oral care 2 UNILEVER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW 2009 Operating proft Purchase of goods Employees (millions) and services (millions) (year end) E5,020 E28,549 163,000 37% 25% 38% 32% 31% 37% 25% 17% 58% 2009 l The Americas l Western Europe l Asia, Africa and Central & Eastern Europe Category highlights Savoury, dressings and spreads Personal care E million % underlying E million % underlying 13,256 turnover (0.1 ) sales growth 11,846 turnover 5.3 sales growth Ice cream and beverages Home care E million % underlying E million % underlying 7,753 turnover 4.0 sales growth 6,968 turnover 7.1 sales growth 3 An overview of our impacts Our business and brands have impacts at every stage of their lifecycle: in sourcing raw materials, packaging, manufacture, distribution, consumer use and disposal. Raw materials Operations E15.3 billion spent with 264 Unilever manufacturing over 10,000 suppliers sites globally of raw materials, packaging Consistent improvements in eco -effciency and goods for re -sale performance since 1995, per tonne of production −41%* CO2 from energy We buy 12% of the world’ s black tea and −65%* water use 3% of the world’ s palm oil −73%* total waste Our carbon footprint (estimate) Consumer use of our products accounts for by far the largest proportion of our impact. Raw materials and packaging x10 x1 x1 Raw materials Packaging Ben & Jerry’s Caring Unilever Distribution Sourcing our Primary and secondary Dairy programme operations Distribution of products helps farmers reduce agricultural and packaging, eg paper, Factories (including from factories to point their energy and chemical raw materials plastic, glass and metal third-party of sale via a network water use largely accounts for our manufacturing), including road, rail ‘upstream’ CO2 impacts travel and buildings and sea Our water footprint (estimate) Our impacts occur mainly in the growing of raw materials and in consumer use of our products.
Recommended publications
  • The Oil Palm (Elaeis Guineensis)
    PALM S Rival & Levang: Oil Palm Vol. 59(1) 2015 ALAIN RIVAL The Oil Palm Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche (Elaeis Agronomique pour le Développement guineensis ): Jakarta, Indonesia [email protected] Research AND Challenges PATRICE LEVANG Institut de Recherche pour Beyond le Développement Yaoundé, Cameroon Controversies [email protected] Scientists certainly have a part to play in the debate over oil palm ( Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) cultivation, which has captured and polarized public opinion, kindled and undoubtedly shaped by the media. How can this palm be viewed as a “miracle plant” by both the agro-food industry in the North and farmers in the tropical zone, but a serious ecological threat by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) campaigning for the environment or the rights of indigenous peoples? The time has come to move on from this biased and often irrational debate, which is rooted in topical issues of contemporary society in the North, such as junk food, biodiversity, energy policy and ethical consumption. One of the reasons the public has developed as nuclear energy, genetically modified crops such fixed ideas is that there has been a lack or shale gas) that is causing controversy but an of accurate information on the sector and its entire agrom-food sector that has come to actors and a clear-headed analysis of what is symbolize the conflict between the at stake. We point out that the production and conservation of natural spaces and de- processing of palm oil are part of a complex velopment. Consumers, elected representatives globalized agrom-industrial sector shared by and scientists are finally forced to take sides for multiple actors and stakeholders with often or against palm oil, with no room for ifs and conflicting interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Church & Dwight Co., Inc
    cd_2004_an_pdf_cov.qxd 5/3/05 5:16 PM Page 1 2004 CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. ® Annual Report cd_2004_an_pdf_cov.qxd 5/3/05 5:16 PM Page 2 Financial Highlights Dollars in millions, except per share data 2004 2003 CHANGE SALES $1,462 $1,057 +38% INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 172 112 +54% NET INCOME 89 81 +10% NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED 1.36 1.28 +6% DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 0.23 0.21 +10% Additional Information COMBINED SALES (1) (2) $1,702 $1,508 +13% ADJUSTED NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED(1) (3) 1.66 1.33 +25% (1) These are non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures of performance. See notes 2 and 3 for the reconciliations of the non-GAAP numbers to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. (2) Includes Armkel sales of $193 million and $411 million for 2004 and 2003, respectively, and Other Equity Affiliates sales of $56 million and $49 million for 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excludes intercompany sales of $9 million for both 2004 and 2003. Management believes this information is useful to investors because the businesses of the Company and its unconsolidated equity investees are managed on a combined basis, and management uses combined performance measures to analyze performance and develop financial objectives. Moreover, since the results of operations of the former Armkel business have been included in Church & Dwight's consolidated statement of income beginning on May 29, 2004, the information enhances comparability over the relevant period. (3) Excludes, in 2004, an accounting charge of $0.10 per share related to the acquisition of the 50% interest in Armkel that the Company did not previously own, as well as charges of $0.20 per share related to the early redemption of debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Nölken Palm(Kernel)Oil-Statement
    2 Nölken Palm oil and palm kernel oil Statement Palm oil is one of the most important vegetable oils as well as the displacement of indigenous people and in the world and is used in many consumer goods. the destruction of biodiversity. During the extraction of palm oil from the fruit, it is also possible to obtain palm kernel oil. This oil from For the variety of care and cosmetics products which palm kernel is a key ingredient for the production of we produce, we use raw materials such as surfactants washing and cleaning substances, e.g. for cosmetics and or emulsifiers based on renewable raw materials with detergents. Palm oil is also used in the food industry and palm kernel oil for example as a primary material. These as fuels or combustibles. However, the cultivation of oil raw materials are identified as palm oil or palm kernel palms (Elaeis guineensis) is often criticised because the oil derivatives. As a result of their productivity, palm production of palm oil is still associated with negative kernel oil derivatives are best suited to the production effects such as the clearance of rain forests, cultivation of cosmetic products. on peat soil with the emission of large amounts of CO2, Replacing palm kernel oil with other oils is not really a non-governmental organisations (i.e. WWF, Greenpea- solution. The shift to soy oil for example, the second ce) call not for an end to the use of palm (kernel) oil most important vegetable oil in the world, would then but for a transfer to a sustainable cultivation of palm cause problems in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies That Do Test on Animals
    COMPANIES THAT DO TEST ON ANIMALS Frequently Asked Questions Why are these companies included on the 'Do Test' list? The following companies manufacture products that ARE tested on animals. Those marked with a are currently observing a moratorium (i.e., current suspension of) on animal testing. Please encourage them to announce a permanent ban. Listed in parentheses are examples of products manufactured by either the company listed or, if applicable, its parent company. For a complete listing of products manufactured by a company on this list, please visit the company's Web site or contact the company directly for more information. Companies on this list may manufacture individual lines of products without animal testing (e.g., Clairol claims that its Herbal Essences line is not animal-tested). They have not, however, eliminated animal testing from their entire line of cosmetics and household products. Similarly, companies on this list may make some products, such as pharmaceuticals, that are required by law to be tested on animals. However, the reason for these companies' inclusion on the list is not the animal testing that they conduct that is required by law, but rather the animal testing (of personal-care and household products) that is not required by law. What can be done about animal tests required by law? Although animal testing of pharmaceuticals and certain chemicals is still mandated by law, the arguments against using animals in cosmetics testing are still valid when applied to the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. These industries are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, respectively, and it is the responsibility of the companies that kill animals in order to bring their products to market to convince the regulatory agencies that there is a better way to determine product safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Sustainability Issues in the Palm Oil Sector
    Key Sustainability Issues in the Palm Oil Sector A Discussion Paper for Multi-Stakeholders Consultations (commissioned by the World Bank Group) By Cheng Hai Teoh THE WORLD BANK Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this discussion draft do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank Group or its member governments. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this draft and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this draft do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Table of Contents A. Introduction ................................................................................................... 2 Background ............................................................................................................ 2 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 Approach ............................................................................................................... 3 B. Overview of the Palm Oil Sector ..................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 Development of the palm oil sector ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Palm Derivatives in the Baked Goods and Prepared Foods
    Sustainable Palm Derivatives in the Baked Goods and Prepared Foods A CPET Special Newsletter March 2016 The Purpose of this Special Newsletter This newsletter provides information and guidance to businesses and government departments on sourcing baked goods and prepared foods made with sustainable palm oil and palm kernel oil and their derivatives. It outlines the complexities in the palm oil supply chain, explains why sustainable palm oil and palm-based derivatives have been difficult to source in the past, and provides an overview of what manufacturers are currently doing to manufacture baked good and prepared foods made with sustainable and traceable palm oil. It also provides a quick guide to sourcing certified palm oil in food products. Introduction to Palm-based Derivative Supply Chain Palm oil and palm kernel oil are complex commodities due to the demand for a large number of fractions and derivatives of the oils. In fact, about 60% of the palm oil and palm kernel oil consumed globally is in the form of derivatives such as olein and stearin.1 The versatility of palm makes it an attractive commodity, but the supply chains for these derivatives are multi-layered and have been historically difficult to trace. Although traceability is improving, the derivatives can be challenging to source as sustainable. At the most basic level of the refining process, palm oil and palm kernel oil are split, fractionated, and separated into liquid palm olein and solid palm stearin at a ratio of 4:1. Further fractionation, hydrogenation, refining and blending can then be carried out to produce different oil derivatives with unique physical and chemical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Palm Derivatives in Cleaning and Personal Care Products
    Sustainable Palm Derivatives in Cleaning and Personal Care Products A CPET Special Newsletter July 2015 The Purpose of this Special Newsletter This newsletter is meant to provide information and guidance to businesses and government departments on sourcing cleaning products and personal care products made with sustainable palm oil derivatives. It outlines the complexities in the derivatives supply chain, explains why sustainable palm-based derivatives have been difficult to source in the past, and provides a quick guide to sourcing certified derivatives. Introduction to Palm-based Derivative Supply Chain Palm oil and palm kernel oil are complex commodities because of the demand for a large number of fractions and derivatives of the oils. In fact, about 60% of the palm oil and palm kernel oil consumed globally is in the form of derivatives such as olein and stearin.1 The supply chains for these derivatives are multi-layered and have been historically difficult to trace. Although traceability is improving, the derivatives can be challenging to source as sustainable. Oleochemicals, which are produced from the fatty acid distillates that result from the refining process of palm oil and palm kernel oil, are typically used in the production of cleaning products and personal care products. Palm based oleochemicals have a diverse range of applications. In the past decade, many European manufacturers and traders have shifted towards the use of palm-derived oleochemicals (as opposed to petrochemicals or other plant based oleochemicals), due to the increase in the number of plants in Southeast Asia with access to palm feedstocks. The environmental and social repercussions of this shift in usage, and the parallel significant increase in oil palm plantations in Southeast Asia, have been dramatic, leading to deforestation, climate change, habitat loss, and disruptions to local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pemakaian Bahasa Dalam Iklan Berita Dan Papan Reklame.Tif
    L8 IIDIIK DIPERDAGANGKIIN UNl UK UMUM Pemakaian Bahasa Dalam lklan Berita Dan Papan Reklame E. Zaenal Arifin Zulkarnain Jumariam I - ~ ... j t' ~ ... '; ,1 f ~~~ . ~ f <~.~./If!... ___ _ I •L ---.... + ~~~~ ..... t.J ".. - ... ___ -...._..__iii Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Jakarta 1992 iii r r . ISBN 979 459 203 X Hak cipta dilindungi oleh undang-undang Sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini dilarang diperbanyak dalam bentuk apapun tanpa izin tertulis dari penerbit, kecuali dalam hal pengutipan unt uk keperlu­ an penulisan artikel atau karangan ilmiah . Staf Proyek Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah Jakarta: Dr. Hans Lapoliwa, M.Phil (Pemimpin Proyek), Drs. K. Biskoyo (Sekretaris) , A. Rachman Idris (Bendaharawan), Drs. M. Syafei Zein, Nasim , dan Hartatik (Staf). Pewajah kulit: K. Biskoyo iv KATAPENGANTAR Masalah bahasa dan sastra di Indonesia mencakup tiga masalah pokok, yaitu masalah bahasa nasional, bahasa daerah, dan bahasa asing. Ketiga masalah pokok itu p<>rlu digarap dengan sungguh-sungguh dan berencana dalam rangka pembinaan dan pengernbangan bahasa Indonesia. Pembinaan bahasa ditujukan kepada peninf;,k.atan mutu pemakaian bahasa Indonesia dengan baik dan pengembangan bahasa itu ditujukan pada pelengkapan bahasa Indonesia sebagai sarana komunikasi nasional dan sebagai wahana pengungkap berbagai aspek kehidupan sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman. Upaya pencapaian tujuan itu dilakukan melalui penelitian bahasa dan sastra dalam berbagai aspeknya baik bahasa Indonesia, bahasa daerah maupun bahasa asing ; dan peningkatan mutu pemakaian bahasa Indonesia dilakukan melalui penyuluhan tentang penggunaan bahasa Indonesia dengan baik dan benar dalam masyarakat serta penyebarluasan berbagai buku pedoman dan hasil penelitian. Sejak tahun 1974 penelitian bahasa dan sastra, baik Indonesia, daerah maupun asing ditangani oleh Proyek Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, yang berkedudukan di Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 5 POPSIG Newsletter 2017 Q1 View Document
    IChemE POPSIG Newsletter Issue 05 Cover Story 4 IChemE Malaysia Awards 2016 In the News 2 Message from Editor 3 RSPO RT14 2016 5 Interview with IChemE Malaysia Palm Oil Award 2016 Winner 6 Supply Chain Management for Palm Oil Industry 6 Refreshing Rapport 7 Seminar on Environmental Mainstreaming of Palm Oil Sector POPSIG gratefully acknowledges the following sponsors: Monash University Malaysia, Desmet Ballestra Malaysia, for provision of venue facilities and refreshment for sponsoring quarterly newsletter IChemE POPSIG Newsletter Issue 05 Editor’s Message 2016 has been a highly successful first full year for POPSIG as a provisional SIG of IChemE and in 2017 is now a full fledged SIG. We look forward to IChemE members signing up for POPSIG as their first or even second SIG as you pay your 2017 subscription. The first 10 signups in early October 2016 saw 2 from Australia, 3 from Malaysia, 1 from The Netherlands and 3 from United Kingdom reflecting the global interest in palm oil. 2017 promises to be an exciting year and the POPSIG committee has lined up a very full programme for the year. It is a year that Ma- laysia celebrates 100 years of palm oil and to mark this centenary POPSIG will host a day long seminar reviewing the process achievements made as well as the process improvements sought after in the next decade. It will be rounded off with a panel discus- sion by distinguished personalities in the palm oil industry who will also appraise the contribution of chemical engineers to the palm oil industry. In this issue we cover the annual RSPO RT 14 in Bangkok which started with hard hitting comments from the Co-chair of RSPO.
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation and Social Risks in the Uk's Commodity
    1 RISKY BUSINESS WORKING TOGETHER TO UNDERSTAND RISKS TO NATURAL CAPITAL DEFORESTATION AND SOCIAL RISKS IN THE UK’S COMMODITY SUPPLY CHAINS Lead authors: Steve Jennings, Richard Sheane and Catherine McCosker This report sets out research commissioned by WWF and the RSPB, carried out by consultancy 3Keel. It calculates the volume and source of UK imports (from 2011-15) of seven key forest-risk commodities: beef and leather, cocoa, palm oil, pulp and paper, rubber, soy, and timber. This data is then used to estimate the location and scale of the land footprint created by UK consumption of these commodities, and explores the risks associated with this footprint. The research uses publicly available data and sets out the assumptions made in estimating the footprint and risks. The findings of this research are summarised and analysed in a separate report, which also includes recommendations on what UK government, companies and citizens can do to address the risks. Risky Business: Understanding the UK’s overseas footprint for deforestation-risk commodities Available at: wwf.org.uk/riskybusiness Reports published October 2017. Contents 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 About this document ............................................................................................ 6 3 Overview of method .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Global Deforestation: Policy Options for Consumer Countries Ending Global Deforestation: Ending Global Deforestation: Policy Options for Consumer Countries
    Ending Global Deforestation: Options for Consumer Countries Policy Ending Global Deforestation: Policy Options for Consumer Countries Duncan Brack with Rob Bailey September 2013 Duncan Brack with Rob Bailey Chatham House, 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T: +44 (0)20 7957 5700 E: [email protected] F: +44 (0)20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Charity Registration Number: 208223 Ending Global Deforestation: Policy Options for Consumer Countries Duncan Brack with Rob Bailey September 2013 © The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2013 Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) is an independent body which promotes the rigorous study of international questions and does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. Forest Trends is a Washington D.C.-based international non-profit organization that was created in 1998. Our mission is four-fold: to expand the value of forests to society; to promote sustainable forest management and conservation by creating and capturing market values for ecosystem services; to support innovative projects and companies that are developing these markets; and to enhance the livelihoods of local communities living in and around those forests. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publishers. Chatham House 10 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4LE T: +44 (0) 20 7957 5700 F: + 44 (0) 20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Charity Registration No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2015 11 Global Business Overview Wilmar International Limited Sustainability Report 2015 12
    Scope & Boundaries We have sought to apply the guidance of GRI G4 for the boundary settings, focusing on performance data and reporting on aspects which are most significant, as reflected in our No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation Policy. We will report at policy-level on our policies with regards to crude palm oil (CPO) suppliers and fresh fruit bunches (FFB) suppliers. Whilst we now have better insights into the performance of our key suppliers, we have not included these in our metrics, as such information is subject to confidentiality agreements, and we believe that performance metrics should be disclosed by these companies themselves. Performance metrics are focused on Wilmar’s palm oil operations globally in our upstream business. We are primarily focusing on the performance of our own plantations in Indonesia and Malaysia as these are the most scrutinised among our activities and the key concern of our stakeholders. However, we have also included metrics for our African operations where these are considered material. Detailed About This Design Specific Issue Performance Policy Raised By Data On Material Commitments Stakeholders Wilmar International Limited recognises the importance Aspects of transparency and accountability in the supply chain Plantations in order to achieve our end-goal of a deforestation- and Mills in and exploitation-free palm oil industry. Indonesia, Yes Yes Yes Malaysia and Being able to trace supply flows back to palm Africa oil mills and over time to plantations is therefore a means towards that end, including knowing FFB Suppliers No Yes Yes supplier’s locations and practices on the ground.
    [Show full text]