DOCSLIB.ORG

BLM's Wild Areas Under Attack

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BLM's Wild Areas Under Attack FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS WINTER 2003 BLMs wild areas under attack By Shaaron Netherton eas the BLM recommended as non-suitable for It appears that the extractive industries may be Wilderness. The BLM’s reasons for why areas pushing the Bureau of Land Management to drop shouldn’t be Wilderness included: the areas are too protection for millions and millions of acres of Wil- flat, too steep, not enough vegetation, vegetation derness Study Areas. In a move that is blatantly too thick, it might have mineral values, and so the against the intent of Congress, the Administration excuses went. These recommendations were de- is looking to drop all of the Wilderness Study Ar- veloped over two decades ago when the face of the west was much different. When the final Wilderness suitability recom- WBy ildernessBrian Beffort fire fighting mendations were made in Nevada, of the 110 Wil- When BLM notifies Friends of Nevada Wil- derness study areas totalling over 5.1 million acres, derness of illegal activities and proposed actions in the Nevada BLM recommended less than 2 million Wilderness and Wilderness Study Areas, we have acres as suitable for designation. Under the 30 days to respond with our comments. Administration’s plan, over 2 million acres of This fall, we learned of two wildfires in WSAs Nevada’s Wilderness Study Areas could lose pro- in 2002 that resulted in unnecessary impacts. Last tection and their chances for designation be lost summer, crews fighting fires in the Desatoya forever. Success! Mountains WSA (Carson City district) and the Congress has shown time and time again that Parsnip Peak WSA (Ely district) used bulldozers BLM recommendations were outdated and no to cut fire lines. Similar fire mismanagement oc- longer valid. In 2000, Congress designated wilder- Clark County curred this last year in the Elko and Battle Moun- ness areas in the Black Rock Desert region that Conservation tain BLM districts. the BLM said were not suitable; areas like the Although it’s legal to use bulldozers to fight Calico Mountains, the Jackson Mountains, Pahute of Public Land fires, we believe they should be used when loss of Peak and the North Black Rock Range. Only a and Natural property, life or other emergencies could result few months ago, Congress designated areas like Resources Act without their use. In both of these situations, the the North McCullough Mountains, Arrow Canyon, BLM admitted the bulldozers were not necessary, Jumbo Springs, El Dorado and Ireteba Peaks, of 2002 stating that out-of-state fire crews, who were less which the BLM found were not suitable for Wil- designates familiar with the areas, used them accidentally. derness designation. Friends of Nevada Wilder- 452,000 acres While we understand that in the heat of a fire, ness will be closely monitoring the situation and these things can happen, these two events and will keep our members updated. of Wilderness other similar violations show that we need to work see story on harder with the BLM’s fire program to prevent From the front lines Page 2 page 3 violations. We are working with state director Bob Citizens at work on wilderness Page 3 Abbey and the field offices to implement sure-fire Wilderness areas and acerage Page 4 (yes, pun intended) Minimum Impact Suppression Kick off new 2003 campaign Page 4 Tactics that will allow crews to fight fires without Trek the Mormon Mountains Page 5 Inside: Action alert to acquire lands Page 6 unnecessarily damaging Wilderness values. Helping hands restore the land Page 7 1 d From the front lines by Shaaron Netherton, Executive Director Board of Directors Happy New Year to all! our watchdog efforts over all Wilderness Id like to welcome all the new quality lands within the state and fighting members who joined Friends of Neva- to keep WSAs protected. Well also be Las HermiVegas MembersHiatt da Wilderness last year. We appreciate working for expanded protection of our John Hiatt Theo Byrns your dedication to Nevadas wildlands. Forest Service roadless areas as part of We celebrated the upcoming Forest Plan Reno Members another Wilder- revision in Nevada. Ron Hunter It would not have Roger Scholl ness success in Friends of Nevada Wil- happened without Marge Sill southern Nevada derness will be working to you, our dedicated Karen Boeger with the passage protect Fish and Wildlife Henry Egghart of the Clark members. Service managed Wilder- Corey Lewis County Conserva- Thanks to each and ness- quality areas in both tion of Public every one of you! the Desert National Land and Natural Game Range and the Executive Director Shaaron Netherton Resources Act of Sheldon Antelope Range. 2002 that designated 452,000 acres We want to help the Fish and Wildlife Las Vegas Staff Jeremy Garncarz of threatened Wilderness. A special Service celebrate their 100-year anni- Dino Fulgencio thanks to the leadership skills of Sena- versary in 2003 with a legacy gift of Reno Staff tor Reid and his staff. While this was a Wilderness protection. Lastly, were Brian Beffort bipartisan bill, it would not have suc- looking forward to working with the state Pat Patera ceeded without Senator Reids extreme legislature on Wilderness issues during Richard Knox ability and influence in the Senate. It the 2003 session. also would not have happened without Think big and act wild, you, our dedicated members. Thanks NorthernPO BoxNe v9754ada Office to each and every one of you! Reno, NV 89507 (775) 324-7667 Without breaking stride, Friends of Nevada Wilderness is jumping into our Foreman speaks Eastern Nevada Wilderness Campaign Sout1700hern E. Desert Nevada Inn #406Office with both feet. Our next issue will focus out for wild places Las Vegas, NV 89109 Friends of Nevada Wilderness in more detail on the incredible Wil- (702) 650-6542 hosted an evening fundraiser with derness values found in Lincoln, White Dave Foreman, leading Wilderness www.nevadawilderness.orgWebsite Pine and Nye Counties. With your con- activist and author on October 7th. tinued help, we hope to see significant Dave shared his passion and vision [email protected] Wilderness protection for some of for wild landscapes with over 100 these fabulous wild places. Were add- supporters at Patagonia in Reno. ing a rural Wilderness organizer in Ely Over $1,000 was raised to help pub- Get on the list to help make this protection a reality. lish the Nevada Wilderness Testimo- Our new year, 2003, is shaping up ny Book, scheduled to be out this To get Wilderness news to be a very busy onein addition to spring. A huge thanks to Dave for and action alerts, eastern Nevada, well be working for coming back to Nevada to help raise subscribe to the Friends sound management of our newly des- awareness about our stunning wild of Nevada Wilderness places. Many thanks to Roberta ignated Wilderness areas in the Las email list: Send post to Moore for putting the Nevada Wil- Vegas area as well as for the Black [email protected] derness Testimony book together. A subscribe with as subject Rock/High Rock Wilderness areas des- howling great time was had by all. ignated in 2000. Well be continuing 2 d CitizensKeeping it Wild: work creates Wilderness By Dino Fulgencio Barely two months ago, two years of exten- The bill was introduced as a comprehensive sive field work, public meetings, grassroots orga- conservation and growth plan for public lands in nizing and education efforts to obtain Wilderness Clark County. Nevada’s Congressional delegation protection for some of Southern Nevada’s spec- has been working with local governments and in- Southern tacular wild lands finally reached fruition. The terest groups for more than a year to develop the proposal, which will accommodate growth while Nevada Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Happenings Natural Resources Act of 2002 was signed into protecting natural resources for current and future law on November 6, 2002. Area list on page 4. generations of Nevadans. From the heights of the Ireteba Peaks to the Activists mapped potential protected areas. Volunteer Night depths of Arrow Canyon, from the Joshua trees They wrote letters, published brochures and gave every Thursday of Wee Thump to the pon- slide show presenta- 4-8 pm at Moose derosa pines of the LaMa- tions to the public to McGillicuddys dre Mountains, some introduce their fel- Happy Hour 452,000 acres of southern Clark County low citizens to the Nevada Wildernesss are Conservation of Public wild beauty in their Northern now permanently protect- Land and Natural own backyards. And Nevada ed as Wilderness. Resources Act of 2002 they met with other Happenings The new law balances stakeholders to en- The legislation, introduced by Nevadas sure that conserva- the needs for infrastruc- Volunteer Night ture development, recre- Senators Harry Reid (D) and John Ensign (R) tion was represented and Rep. Jim Gibbons (R), designated in the public lands first Wednesday, ational opportunities, and 5:30 - 7:00 at 452,000 acres of new Wilderness in Clark bill, which also ad- conservation of our pre- Silver Peak cious natural resources in County and created the Sloan Canyon dressed recreation and development Brewery southern Nevada. In a National Conservation Area. Happy Hour nutshell, this landmark concerns in the na- piece of legislation tem- tion’s fastest-grow- pers development with conservation measures ing county, Las Vegas’ own Clark County. that will protect our pristine vistas and promote Conservationists, although not entirely in favor responsible growth in what is becoming a highly- of every aspect of the legislation, welcomed the urbanized segment of Southern Nevada. wilderness component of the public lands bill be- cause it is a positive first step towards wilderness protection in Southern Nevada.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Nevada Wilderness Stewardship Program Accomplishments 2012
    Friends of Nevada Wilderness Stewardship Program Accomplishments 2012 Project Summary (Nevada Totals—no crew #s): Total Restoration Projects: 80 Total Number of Monitoring Projects: 60 Total Volunteers: 807 Total Volunteer Hours: 9,778 Total In-Kind Donations: $226,153 Total Number of Outreach Events: 52 Total Number of Youth/Education Programs: 27 Total Number of Youth/Education Participants: 818 Projects (southern Nevada totals): Total Restoration Projects: 43 Total Number of Monitoring Projects: 26 Total Volunteers: 470 Total Volunteer Hours: 4,270 Total In-Kind Donation: $93,728 Total Number of Outreach Events: 16 Total Number of Youth/Education Programs: 27 Total Number of Youth/Education Program Participants: 818 Project Summary (northern Nevada totals): Total Restoration Projects: 32 Total Number of Monitoring Projects: 34 Total Volunteers: 337 Total Volunteer Hours: 5,508 Total In-Kind Donation: $132,425 Total Number of Outreach Events: 36 Crews: Total Crew Members: 22 Total Crew Hours: 7,565.07 Total Crew In-Kind Donation: $164,145.67 Southern Nevada Stewardship January 22 - Mt. Charleston Wilderness: Cliff Rose Trail, Kyle Canyon – USFS Total Volunteers: 27 Total Volunteer Hours: 189 Total In-Kind Donation: $4,037 Description: Brushed 1.5 miles of trail in prep for new tread on the new Cliff Rose Trail. February 14 - DESERT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: Corn Creek-Intersection of Mormon Well Rd and Pine Nut Rd – USFWS, SCA Crew Description: Installed post and cable fencing to prevent "campsite creep" at the intersection of Mormon Well and Pine Nut Roads. The team dug 2ft holes into very rocky soil to install 14 posts, and strung 102ft of cable.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54
    STATE OF NEVADA ·DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City / Photograph by Lawrence Radiation Laboratory· Sedan Crater was formed in the dry a ll uv ium of Yucca Flat by on underground atomic detonation. WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 54 REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUNTIES, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior 1970 WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE: SEJUES REPORT 54 ·. REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS·IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUN'riE:S, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush PreparBd cooperatively by the Geological Survey, u.s. Department of the Interior 1971 -\ FOREWORD The progr~m of reconnaissance water-resources studies was authorized by the 1960 Legislature to be carried on by Division of Water Resources of the Departc.ment of· Conservation and Natural Resources in cooperation with the u.s. Geological Survey. This report is the 54th in the series to be prepared by the staff of the Nevada District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey. These 54 reports describe the hydrology of 185 valleys. The reconnaissance surveys make available pertinent information of great and immediate value to many State and Federal agencies, the State cooperating agency, and the public. As development takes place in any area, ,]c,,mands for more detailed information will arise, and studies to supply such information will be undertaken. In the meantime, these reconnaissance studies are timely and adequately In<'eet tlle immediate needs for information on the wate.r resources of the areas covered by the reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan O the Sky Highway T
    Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Highway to the Sky CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE & VISION PURPOSE & VISION 1 PLAN PURPOSE 2 CORRIDOR SETTING 3 VISION & GOALS 6 STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC OUTREACH 7 CHAPTER 2: MOUNT ROSE SCENIC BYWAY’S INTRINSIC VALUES INTRINSIC VALUES 19 TERRAIN 20 OWNERSHIP 22 LAND USE & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 24 VISUAL QUALITY 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES 30 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 34 HYDROLOGY 40 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES & WILDLIFE 42 FUEL MANAGEMENT & FIRES 44 CHAPTER 3: THE HIGHWAY AS A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 47 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 48 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES & TRENDS 49 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 50 EXISTING BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 50 EXISTING TRAFFIC SAFETY 50 EXISTING PARKING AREAS 55 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 55 CHAPTER 4: ENHANCING THE BYWAY FOR VISITING, LIVING & DRIVING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES & ACTION ITEMS 57 PRESERVE THE SCENIC QUALITY & NATURAL RESOURCES 59 BALANCE RECREATION ACCESS WITH TRANSPORTATION 68 & SAFETY NEEDS CONNECT PEOPLE WITH THE CORRIDOR 86 PROMOTE TOURISM 94 CHAPTER 5: CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP 99 MANAGING PARTNERS 100 CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS 102 | i This Plan was funded by an On Our Way grant from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and a Federal Scenic Byway Grant from the Nevada Department of Transportation. ii | Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER ONE 1 PURPOSE & VISION Chapter One | 1 The Corridor PLAN PURPOSE The Mount Rose Scenic Byway is officially named the “Highway to the Management Sky” and offers travelers an exciting ascent over the Sierra Nevada from Plan identifies the sage-covered slopes of the eastern Sierra west to Lake Tahoe. Not only goals, objectives does the highway connect travelers to a variety of recreation destinations and cultural and natural resources along the Byway, it also serves as a and potential minor arterial connecting both tourists and commuters from Reno to Lake enhancements to Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Iz Onautah California Cal If Orn Ia Oregon Idaho
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num
    Appendix A-4--Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num. Num. (sq.mi.) (acres) Desig Hydrograph Area/Sub-Area Counties [1] [2] [3] [4] Nearest Cities [6] Name Included [5] Carson City, 8 104 69 44,160 Eagle Valley Carson City Yes Douglas Frenchman, 10 125 43 27,520 Stingaree Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 5 77 58 37,120 Fireball Valley Churchill Nixon, Fernley No Frenchman, 10 126 110 70,400 Cowkick Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 10 133 416 266,240 Edwards Creek Valley Churchill Eastgate, Austin No 10 127 216 138,240 Eastgate Valley Area Churchill Eastgate Yes Bradys Hot Springs, 5 75 178 113,920 Brady Hot Springs Area Churchill, Lyon Yes Fernley Churchill, Frenchman, Fallon, 10 124 285 182,400 Fairview Valley Yes Mineral Eastgate Churchill, 10 123 227 145,280 Rawhide Flats Schurz, Fallon No Mineral, Lyon Churchill, 4 74 164 104,960 White Plains Lovelock, Fernley Yes Pershing Churchill, 10 128 1,303 833,920 Dixie Valley Dixie Valley, Fallon Yes Pershing, Lander Churchill, 8 101 2,022 1,294,080 Carson Desert Fallon, Stillwater Yes Pershing, Lyon North Las Vegas, 13 217 80 51,200 Hidden Valley Clark No Moapa Boulder City, 10 167 530 339,200 Eldorado Valley Clark Yes Searchlight Las Vegas, 13 212 1,564 1,000,960 Las Vegas Valley Clark Yes Henderson 13 223 533 341,120 Gold Butte Area Clark Overton, Logandale No 10 165 96 61,440 Jean Lake Valley Clark Jean, Goodsprings Yes Three Lakes Valley-Southern 13 211 311 199,040 Clark Indian Springs Yes Part Bunkerville, 13 224
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water - Surface Water Interactions in the Lower Virgin River Area, Arizona and Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1995 Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada Lynn Metcalf University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Metcalf, Lynn, "Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada" (1995). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 502. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/z90f-mtsv This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • [Nps-Pwr-Pwro-0926-8514] 8360-C19d-454
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/15/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-03037, and on FDsys.gov 4310 A7 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE [NPS-PWR-PWRO-0926-8514] 8360-C19D-454 Jimbilnan, Pinto Valley, Black Canyon, Eldorado, Ireteba Peaks, Nellis Wash, Spirit Mountain, and Bridge Canyon Wilderness Areas Wilderness Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Lake Mead National Recreation Area AGENCY: National Park Service ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Wilderness Management Plan for the Jimbilnan, Pinto Valley, Black Canyon, Eldorado, Ireteba Peaks, Nellis Wash, Spirit Mountain, and Bridge Canyon Wilderness Areas, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Nevada. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service (NPS) is the lead agency for the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for a wilderness management plan for eight wilderness areas in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, three of which are partially located on adjacent Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands. The BLM will serve as a cooperating agency in the preparation of the EIS. The wilderness management plan (plan) will establish management goals for these wilderness areas, develop long term direction for monitoring and preserving wilderness character (i.e., natural, untrammeled, undeveloped, and outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation) in the wilderness areas, while also providing for the use and enjoyment of the areas by current and future generations. Additionally, this plan will provide for accountability, interagency consistency, and continuity in the stewardship of these NPS and BLM wilderness areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada
    Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729-D t **. i &. i-wj'-sA" ..,. r .»\ '* ~ "'" ^^-J5?#^ Chapter D Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada By BARRY MORING, H. RICHARD BLANK, Jr., and JAMES D. HOFFMAN U.S. Geological Survey EDWARD L McHUGH U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade names and trademarks in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-D) Bibliography: p. 1. Mines and mineral resources Nevada Clover Mountains Wilderness. 2. Clover Mountains Wilderness (Nev.) I. Moring, Barry, C. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1729-D 557.3 s 88-600195 [TN24.N3] [553'.09793'14] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Area The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]