Evaluation-And-Assessment-Of-Ontarios-Waterpower-Potential-Final-Report-.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation-And-Assessment-Of-Ontarios-Waterpower-Potential-Final-Report-.Pdf prepared for and Ministry of Natural Resources Evaluation and Assessment of Ontario’s Waterpower Potential Final Report October 2005 prepared by The Energy Company Table of Contents DISCLAIMER LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 ONTARIO’S EXISTING WATERPOWER FACILITIES.......................................................... 1 1.2 EXISTING WATERPOWER ENERGY PRODUCTION ........................................................... 3 1.3 PRESENT STUDY BACKGROUND..................................................................................... 4 1.4 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................ 5 2 APPROACH.......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CATEGORIES OF ASSESSMENT........................................................................................ 6 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 9 3.1 IDENTIFICATION OF DATABASES AND PREVIOUS STUDIES OF HYDRO POTENTIAL ........ 9 3.1.1 Databases ................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Previous Studies ..................................................................................................... 10 3.2 ASSESSMENT OF DISCRETE SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS .................................................... 11 3.3 SCREENING CRITERIA .................................................................................................. 12 3.3.1 Economic Criteria .................................................................................................. 13 3.3.2 Transmission Criteria............................................................................................. 15 3.3.3 Policy Criteria........................................................................................................ 16 4 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................... 18 4.1 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 POTENTIAL SITES RELATED TO LAND-USE AND POLICY AREAS ................................. 21 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS ................................................. 22 LIST OF REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX A - DETAILED INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL WATERPOWER SITES Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Hatch Acres for the sole and exclusive use of the Ontario Waterpower Association (OWA) and shall not be used for any other purpose without authorization from Hatch Acres. Any use of or reliance upon this report by a third party is done at the sole risk of such third party and Hatch Acres hereby disclaims any responsibility or liability in connection therewith. This report contains opinions and conclusions made by Hatch Acres, using its judgment and reasonable care. Any use of or reliance upon this report by OWA is subject to the following conditions: a) This report is meant to be read as a whole, and sections or parts thereof should not be read or relied upon out of context. b) Hatch Acres provides no warranty, guarantee, or other assurances to OWA, express or implied, of any kind, nor assumes liability of any kind relative to the observations and conclusions set out in this report. Information gathered for this report is based on current information and knowledge available on existing plants, dams, and potential sites. Although considerable effort has been made to verify and ensure this information is accurate, it is possible or inevitable that there may be some oversights and/or mistakes made throughout this process. With future studies or investigations on waterpower sites in Ontario, these oversights and/or mistakes can be reviewed and corrected. It is important to note that the intent of the database created from this report is to provide a guideline for choosing waterpower sites to be further investigating for hydroelectric generation. The present study results should not be used as the sole criteria for choosing these sites. List of Tables No. Title 4.1 Summary of Potential Installed Capacity by Category 4.2 Summary of Number of Potential Sites by Category 4.3 Potential Installed Capacity – Land-Use and Policy Areas 4.4 Number of Sites – Land-Use and Policy Areas List of Figures No. Title 1.1 Number of Ontario Waterpower Facilities by Category 1.2 Total Capacity of Ontario Waterpower Facilities by Category 1 Introduction In the past, the Province of Ontario has studied in great detail the waterpower potential in the province. As stated by Ontario Hydro (OH, 1987): “The Province of Ontario is a land of many lakes and rivers, a legacy from the action of glaciers in the Ice Age. At last count, there are about 227,000 lakes in the province. These lakes and their interconnecting rivers cover an area of approximately 181,200 km2, or about 17 percent of the total area of the province. With these many lakes and rivers and a mean annual runoff of 309 mm from precipitation over the entire province, it is no wonder that fresh water is considered one of the most abundant and readily available resources of the province.” Despite this, there remains a perception that ‘there are no waterpower opportunities’ remaining in the province of Ontario. These statements have likely arisen because there have been no significant waterpower developments in Ontario for more than 25 years. Such statements are not accurate. As the demand for electricity increases, many waterpower sites that were previously deemed impractical or uneconomic will become more feasible. As well, developments that were previously proposed but not pursued may also become of interest. Hatch Acres was commissioned at the beginning of August 2005 by the Ontario Waterpower Association (OWA) to undertake an evaluation and assessment of the waterpower potential in the province of Ontario. The intent of the present study is to support OWA’s submission [in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)] to the Ontario Power Authority (OPA), for the OPA’s initiative focused on long-term energy supply options. The present study is a compilation of available information from a large number of sources. No additional fieldwork or site reconnaissance was undertaken for this study. 1.1 Ontario’s Existing Waterpower Facilities The province of Ontario has close to 200 operating waterpower facilities geographically distributed across the province. In total, these facilities have an installed capacity of more than 8000 MW and account, on average, for approximately one quarter of the province’s annual average energy production. 2 Figures 1.1 and 1.2 provide an overview of the relative percentage of facilities by the number of plants (Figure 1.1) and by the total capacity (Figure 1.2) by category. 10% 24% 25% 41% Categories: Capacity under 1 MW Capacity between 1 MW - 10 MW Capacity between 10 MW - 100 MW Capacity over 100 MW Figure 1.1: Number of Ontario Waterpower Facilities by Category 0.2% 4% 21.6% 74.2% Categories: Capacity under 1 MW Capacity between 1 MW - 10 MW Capacity between 10 MW - 100 MW Capacity over 100 MW Figure 1.2: Total Capacity of Ontario Waterpower Facilities by Category 3 Waterpower has been produced in Ontario for more than 100 years, and up until the middle of the 20th century, accounted for almost all the electricity production in the province. Through the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, little waterpower capacity was added, as nearly all of the new plants built were small, with the province choosing to focus investment in other technologies and sources, namely fossil and nuclear generation. Beginning in the mid-1980s and into the early 1990s, the province, through Ontario Hydro, embarked upon the development of a ‘Demand-Supply’ plan that explored electricity options for Ontario going forward. With respect to waterpower, the plan (“Providing the Balance of Power,” OH, 1990) identified in Chapter 12 (The Hydraulic Plan) proposed for Ontario Hydro to develop an additional 3591 MW of hydroelectricity and allocated more than 1300 MW to the private sector. More than a decade later, the majority of that potential remains unrealized. 1.2 Existing Waterpower Energy Production Waterpower plays a unique and increasingly important role in Ontario’s energy supply mix, serving both base-load and peak-load system requirements. The ‘value’ of flexibility was aptly described in the most recent Independent Electricity System Operator’s (IESO’s) 10-Year Outlook (January 2006 – December 2015) (IESO, 2005). “The IESO is concerned with the future management of the province’s water resources as they relate to electricity production. The flexibility available in the operation of hydroelectric facilities is of value to the Ontario power system. The importance of this needs to continue to be reflected and balanced with other uses which may influence provincial requirements with respect to water management. Ontario’s electricity consumption pattern has changed over the last decade. Consumers have historically used more electricity in the winter than they did in the summer. This has reversed. Peak electricity demands now occur during the summer, the season in which water management is typically most restricted. Within
Recommended publications
  • " What Indians Are We Talking About?": a Discourse Analysis Of
    "What indians Are We Talking About?": A Discourse Analysis of Intercultural Dialogues in an Ojibway Setting Jordan Davidson A Thesis in The Department of Sociology and Anthropology Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (Social and Cultural Anthropology) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada June 2008 © Jordan Davidson, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-42480-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-42480-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Lake and Ogoki River Water Diversion Projects
    14 Wawatay News NOVEMBER 20, 2020 ᐧᐊᐧᐊᑌ ᐊᒋᒧᐧᐃᓇᐣ Community Regional Assessment in the Ring of Fire Area Engagement Activities and Participant Funding Available November 12, 2020 — The Minister of Environment and Climate Change has determined that a regional assessment will be conducted in an area centred on the Ring of Fire mineral deposits in northern Ontario. The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) is inviting the public, Indigenous communities, and organizations to provide input to support the planning of the Regional Assessment in the Ring of Fire area. Participants may provide their input to the Agency in either official Rick Garrick/Wawatay language until January 21, 2021. Participants are encouraged to refer to The impacts of waterway diversions in the Matawa region were raised during Treaties Recognition Week the Ring of Fire regional assessment planning information sheet for on the Matawa First Nations Facebook page. additional details. Participants can visit the project home page on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry (reference number 80468) for more options to submit Waterway diversion information. All input received will be published to the Registry as part of the regional assessment file. The Agency recognizes that it is more challenging to undertake meaningful public engagement and Indigenous consultation in light of the education important circumstances arising from COVID-19. The Agency continues to assess the situation with key stakeholders, make adjustments to engagement activities, and is providing flexibility as needed in order to prioritize the health and safety of all Canadians, while maintaining its duty to conduct meaningful for youth engagement with interested groups and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement-In-Principle
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE AMONG: THE ALGONQUINS OF ONTARIO -and- ONTARIO -and- CANADA AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE ................................................................................................ 1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ............................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE .................................. 5 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1: DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 2: GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 3: ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLMENT .......................................................... 8 CHAPTER 4: CLAIMS INSTITUTIONS ....................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 5: LANDS ................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 6: CAPITAL TRANSFERS AND LOAN REPAYMENT............................. 13 CHAPTER 7: FORESTRY ......................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 8: HARVESTING ..................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 9: PARKS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing the Flow Regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus Fontinalis) Incubation Habitats and the Implications for Management in a Hydro-Regulated River
    Characterizing the flow regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) incubation habitats and the implications for management in a hydro-regulated river by Stephen Slongo A Master’s thesis presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario January 2018 1 Abstract Hydropower accounts for more than one third of Ontario Power Generation’s electrical production. Hydroelectric development often occurs on rivers that also support recreational fisheries. The construction and operation of dams, diversions and generating facilities unavoidably influence the ecological function of rivers. The Aguasabon River is a northern Canadian Shield river with major developments for water diversion, storage, and power generation. This river offers opportunity to examine the importance of vertical flows through the substrate at a Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) spawning area. The vertical and horizontal hydraulic gradients and subsequent water temperature changes are the subject of this study. Piezometers were used to monitor the river and subsurface water levels near Brook Trout redds during the spawning and incubation period under normal and increasing discharge conditions. The Brook Trout spawning area in the Aguasabon River experienced upwelling conditions for the entire monitoring period (Oct 28th, 2016 – Jan 13th, 2017) before water release at the Long Lake Control Dam (LLCD). Hyporheic temperatures declined gradually, remaining >3.7 °C. The river temperature in the winter before water release was 1.5 °C. Rapid increase in water level after discharge from above the LLCD resulted in the reversal of flow in the hyporheic zone.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak: a Case Study
    C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak: A Case Study Summative Overview Assisting Remote Communities Across Canada to Access & Use C-Band Public Benefit By Keewaytinook Okimakanak Research Institute Draft Report - March 28, 2005 Page 1 C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Pre-Deployment Activities 3 Inputs 3.1 Bandwidth Allocated 3.2 Marketing the Benefit and Developing Stakeholders 3.2.1 An Open Invitation to Collaborate 3.2.2 Continued Marketing and Stakeholder Development 3.2.3 Coordination with Telesat Canada and Industry Canada 3.2.4 Residential Internet and Public Benefit Discussions 3.3 MHz Allocated per Recipient 3.4 Financial Investments by Stakeholders 3.5 Organizational Development: Training and Staffing 3.5.1 Service Providers 3.5.2 User Organizations, Northern Ontario 3.5.3 Service Providers 4 Activities 4.1 Current Services/Applications Enhanced 4.2 New Services 5 Outputs 5.1 Traffic Reports 5.2 Application Statistics 6 Outcomes 6.1 Passionate Adoption of ICT applications 6.2 Outcomes Identified by Users in Satellite-Served Communities 6.3 Outcomes: Stakeholder Organizations 6.4 Economic Outcomes / Cost Avoidance / Savings 6.5 Social Enterprise 6.6 Employment Opportunities Created 6.7 Outcomes Recognized by Five Communities in Ontario’s far north 6.7.1 Fort Severn: Supporting Local Economic and Social Development On- line 6.7.2 Slate Falls: The power of partnerships: “We’re not remote anymore” 6.7.3 Weagamow: Making education opportunities available in
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service
    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Community Profile TOWN OF SPANISH, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0104 NOVEMBER 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Community Profile: Spanish, ON November 28, 2014 Document History Title: Community Well-Being Assessment – Community Profile – the Town of Spanish, ON Revision: 0 Date: June 29, 2012 Hardy Stevenson and Associates Limited Prepared By: Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 1 Date: August 3, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 2 Date: September 21, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 3 Date: August 30, 2013 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Andrzej Schreyer, Noah Brotman and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 4 Date: January 31, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Dave Hardy and Noah Brotman Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 5 Date: February 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 6 Date: March 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 7 Date: May 29, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave
    [Show full text]
  • The English-Wabigoon River System: 11. Suppression of Mercury and Selenium Bioaccumulation by Suspended and Bottom Sediments
    The English-Wabigoon River System: 11. Suppression of Mercury and Selenium Bioaccumulation by Suspended and Bottom Sediments JOHNB%i'. M. RUDDAND MICHAELA. TURNER Freshwater Institute, Department c.f FisBzeries and Oceans, 581 Unbversi~g'Crescent, Wblznigeg, Mata. R3T 21V$ Rum, 9. W. AND M. A. TURNER.1983. The English-Wabigr~sn River system: II. Suppression of mercury and selenium bioaccumulation by suspended and bottom sediments. Can. 9. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 2218-2227. Bioaccumulation of "3Wg and 75Seby several members of the food chain, including fish, was followed in large in situ enclosures in the presence and absence of organic-poor sediment. When the sediment was absent. 203Hgwas bioaccumulated 8- to 16-fold faster than when it was either suspended in the water or present on the bottom of the enclosures. Mercury- contaminated and uncontaminated sediments were equally effective at reducing the rate of radiolabeled mercury biasaccurnanlation, apparently by binding the mercury to fine particulates making it less available for methylation and/or bioaccumulation. Based on these results, a mercury ameliorating procedure involving senlicdpntinuous resuspension of organic-poor sediments with downstream deposition onto surface sediments is suggested. The presence of sediments, in the water or on the bottom of enclosures, also reduced radiolabeled selenium bisaccumulation. The degree of inhibition (2- to IO-fold) may have been related to the concentration of organic material in the predominantly inorganic sediments. Implications of this research with respect to mercury-selenium interactions in aquatic ecosystems are discussed. RUDD, J. W. M., AND M. A. TURNER.1983. The English- Wabigoon River system: HI. Suppression of mercury and selenium bioaccurnulation by suspended and bottom sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
    Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada Report Prepared for Report Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. 2CG026.000 Effective Date: March 25, 2013 Amended: October 7, 2016 2CG026.000 – Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Canada Page i Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada Prepared for: Prepared by: Gold Canyon Resources Inc. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Suite 810–609 Granville Street 2200–1066 West Hastings Street P.O. Box 10356, Pacific Centre Vancouver, BC V6E 3X2 Vancouver, BC V7Y 1G5 Canada Canada Tel: +1 604 682 3234 Tel: +1 604 681 4196 Tel 2: +1 888 242 3234 Web: www.srk.com Fax: +1 604 682 0537 Web: www.goldcanyon.ca Email: [email protected] SRK Project Number: 2CG026.000 Effective date: March 25, 2013 Signature date: October 7, 2016 Authored by: Dr. Gilles Arseneau, PGeo Bruce Murphy, FSAIMM Associate Consultant (Geology) Principal Consultant (Geotechnical) Dr. Adrian Dance, PEng Michael Royle, PGeo Principal Consultant (Metallurgy) Principal Consultant (Hydrogeology) John Duncan, PEng Dr. Maritz Rykaart, PEng Principal Consultant (Water Resources Principal Consultant (Geotechnical Engineering) Engineering) Chris Elliott, FAusIMM Dino Pilotto, PEng Principal Consultant (Mining) Principal Consultant (Mining) Mark Liskowich, PGeo Principal Consultant (Environmental) Peer Reviewed by: Neil Winkelmann, FAusIMM Principal Consultant (Mining) Acknowledgement: SRK would like to acknowledge the support and collaboration provided by Gold Canyon personnel. Their collaboration was greatly appreciated and instrumental to the success of this report. Cover: Springpole camp March 2013 (source: The Northern Sun News) AD/NW 2CG026 000_Springpole_PEA_TechnicalReport_20161014_FNL October 7, 2016 2CG026.000 – Gold Canyon Resources Inc.
    [Show full text]