DOCSLIB.ORG

NT Reporting Change in the Rangelands (PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NT Reporting Change in the Rangelands (PDF Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System, Reporting Change in the Rangelands – 2007 NT Information for the National Report Rangelands 2007 – Taking the Pulse October 2007 Data and Information Contributed by: Debbie Mullin and Kate Richardson NT Department of Natural Resources, Environment & the Arts With additional input by: Gary Bastin and Melissa Schliebs CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems & ACRIS Management Unit 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures..........................................................................................................................................3 Summary.................................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................5 Reporting Area ....................................................................................................................................6 Report Contents ..................................................................................................................................6 Seasonal Quality as Context for Reporting Change ...............................................................................7 Method.................................................................................................................................................7 Assigning Causality to Change ...........................................................................................................9 Pastoral Monitoring Activity...................................................................................................................10 Landscape Function..............................................................................................................................10 Sustainable Management .....................................................................................................................11 Critical stock forage...........................................................................................................................11 Woody Cover.....................................................................................................................................11 Distance from Water..........................................................................................................................12 Land Values ..........................................................................................................................................13 Photos Showing Change.......................................................................................................................15 Darwin Coastal IBRA.........................................................................................................................15 Darwin Coastal IBRA.........................................................................................................................16 Sturt Plateau IBRA ............................................................................................................................17 Ord Victoria Plain IBRA .....................................................................................................................18 References............................................................................................................................................19 Appendix One: GIS Analysis of Distance from Water...........................................................................20 Rationale ...........................................................................................................................................20 Datasets ............................................................................................................................................20 Data Analysis.....................................................................................................................................21 Results...............................................................................................................................................21 Proportion of sub-IBRA analysed ..................................................................................................21 Proportion of land in each distance from water class ....................................................................21 Comments: .................................................................................................................................21 Water remoteness index:...............................................................................................................23 Comments ..................................................................................................................................23 Attachment 1: Theme 1 – Change in Landscape Function...................................................................25 Attachment 2: Theme 2 – Change in Sustainable Grazing Management ..........................................142 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Number of cattle stations and percentage area of pastoral lease tenure for bioregions where land values are being reported...............................................................13 Table 2. Change in average unimproved value of pastoral land by bioregion. Values are CPI adjusted to 2005 dollar values. .......................................................................14 Table 3. Percentage area of each sub-IBRA covered by the distance-from-water layer. .......22 Table 4. The percentage of land per sub-IBRA in each distance from water class. The percentages are based on the proportion of area that was analysed in the NT. ................24 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Bioregions in the NT. ................................................................................................5 Figure 2. Matrix for filtering seasonal effects on change. ........................................................9 Figure 3. Rate of clearing (%) in ‘Top End’ bioregions of the Northern Territory for 2004 and 2005. ...................................................................................................................12 Figure 4. Geographical extent of the distance from water layer available for the NT. ..........20 Figure 5. Mapped remoteness-index values based on the percentage of sub-IBRA area that is >8 km from permanent and semi-permanent sources of stock water....................23 ACRIS Rangelands 2007 – Taking the Pulse; NT contribution to national reporting, October 2007 3 SUMMARY This document integrates reports provided by the Northern Territory Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts (NRETA) that contribute to the NT’s reporting of change in Australia’s rangelands for the period 1992 to 2005. A national synthesis (Rangelands 2007 – Taking the Pulse) has been compiled from relevant jurisdictional and national data by the Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System (ACRIS). Taking the Pulse will be printed by the National Land and Water Resources Audit and will be released in the early part of 2008. Information in this (NT) report relates to: • Change in landscape function, as Attachment 1 to this report (pages 111 to 226). This attachment is also available as the separate Word document, NT ACRIS Theme 1 - Landscape Function.doc. • Change in critical stock forage, as Attachment 2 to this report (pages 227 to 284) and also in the separate Word document, NT ACRIS Theme 2 - Sustainable Management.doc. • Other components of the sustainable pastoral management theme, i.e. change in woody cover and distance from water (refer to table of contents at the start of this report). • Change in unimproved pastoral land values. • Landscape photos from Tier 1 and Tier 2 monitoring sites showing typical changes. Reporting is mainly at bioregion level (version 6.1 of the Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia, IBRA). Where available data are limited spatially, reporting is confined to relevant sub IBRAs of bioregions. The ACRIS Biodiversity Working Group has compiled data and information for the 2007 report based on ten indicators. NRETA, and particularly Alaric Fisher, has contributed biodiversity information for the NT (but that information is not included in this report). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cameron Yates as the former NT representative on the ACRIS Management Committee initiated this work. Graeme Fagan provided oversight and support to the reporting of NRETA staff. We thank both for their input and support. Vanessa Chewings produced the site seasonal quality scores and provided general GIS support and advice. Again, our thanks to Vanessa for her valuable contribution. Members of the ACRIS Management Committee provided more general direction and guidance with jurisdictional contributions to the 2007 national report. NT reporting was supported by Natural Heritage Trust funding administered by the Desert Knowledge CRC. We thank the DK-CRC Secretariat, and Ange Vincent in particular, for their contribution by way of implementing and managing contractual arrangements. ACRIS Rangelands 2007 – Taking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BGC Construction Pty Ltd Report for Great Northern Highway - Lay Down Areas Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment Turkey Creek Lay Down Areas
    BGC Construction Pty Ltd Report for Great Northern Highway - Lay Down Areas Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment Turkey Creek Lay Down Areas May 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report 1 2. Environmental Aspects 2 3. Existing Environment 4 3.1 Climate 4 3.2 Landuse 5 3.3 Topography and Soils 5 3.4 Hydrology 6 3.5 Reserves and Conservation Areas 7 3.6 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 7 3.7 Vegetation 7 3.8 Threatened Ecological Communities 10 3.9 Flora 10 3.10 Weeds 11 3.11 Fauna 13 3.12 Heritage (non-Indigenous) 15 3.13 Aboriginal Heritage 15 3.14 Noise and Vibration 15 3.15 Dust 15 3.16 Visual Amenity 15 3.17 Public Safety and Risk 16 4. Vegetation Clearing 17 4.1 DEC’s Ten Clearing Principles 17 4.2 Clearing in Environmentally Sensitive Areas 17 5. Potential Impacts 18 6. Recommendations and Approvals Required 21 7. Report Limitations 22 8. References 23 61/23982/13940 Great Northern Highway - Lay Down Areas Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment Turkey Creek Lay Down Areas Table Index Table 1 Environmental Aspects Considered for the Project 2 Table 2 Soil Types 5 Table 3 Vegetation Extent and Status 8 Table 4 Regional Assessment of Vegetation Extent (Shepherd, 2005) Ord Victoria Plain IBRA Region 9 Table 5 Regional Assessment of Vegetation Extent (Shepherd, 2005) Central Kimberley IBRA Region 9 Table 6 Weeds Of National Significance (WONS), Declared Plants and Regionally significant weed species that may occur in the Project Areas 12 Table 7 Assessment of Environmental and Social Aspects and Impacts 18 Table 8 Recommendations and Approvals required for the Project 21 Table 9 Conservation Categories and Definitions for EPBC Act Listed Flora and Fauna Species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riparian Flora and Plant Communities of the Pilbara Region Of
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.78(2).2015.485-513 Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement 78: 485–513 (2015). The riparian fl ora and plant communities of the Pilbara region of Western Australia M.N. Lyons Department of Parks and Wildlife, Science and Conservation Division, Kieran McNamara Conservation Science Centre, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract – A survey of riparian fl ora and plant communities was undertaken at 98 wetlands and rivers in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Sampling was quadrat-based, with fl oristics, surface soils and wetland attributes recorded. Selected sites captured the full range of Pilbara wetland types including springs, river pools, claypans, salt marshes and rock pools. A total of 455 taxa was recorded from the survey sites, representing ca. 25% of the known fl ora of the Pilbara bioregion. The fl ora is dominated by taxa with Eremaean and tropical affi nities, with only six taxa endemic in the region. Of recorded taxa known from four or fewer bioregions, most are shared with the adjacent Carnarvon and Gascoyne bioregions rather than the adjoining internally draining deserts. Sixteen taxa of conservation signifi cance were documented, with claypans, the Fortescue Marsh, and Millstream and Karijini National Park sites dominating occurrences of rare species. Eight major groups were defi ned by classifying wetlands in terms of species presence/absence data. Floristic patterning was strongly aligned with the major wetland types (geomorphic/hydrological) used in the primary sampling stratifi cation. A combination of wetland morphology/hydrological setting, site edaphic attributes and distance to the coast were dominant variables related to riparian fl oristic composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Total Grazing Pressure 29 4.4.7
    Review of total grazing pressure management issues and priorities for biodiversity conservation in rangelands: A resource to aid NRM planning Final Report August 2004 A report to the Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage prepared by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Authors Alaric Fisher NT Department of Infrastructure Planning and Environment, Darwin Leigh Hunt CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Darwin Craig James CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Alice Springs Jill Landsberg James Cook University, Cairns David Phelps Queensland Department of Primary Industry, Longreach Anita Smyth CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Alice Springs Ian Watson WA Department of Agriculture, Northam Suggested citation method Fisher, A., Hunt, L., James, C., Landsberg, J., Phelps, D., Smyth, A., Watson, I. 2004. Review of total grazing pressure management issues and priorities for biodiversity conservation in rangelands: A resource to aid NRM planning. Desert Knowledge CRC Project Report No. 3 (August 2004); Desert Knowledge CRC and Tropical Savannas Management CRC, Alice Springs. Acknowledgements The following people generously gave of their time to provide information and comments for this report: Vanessa Chewings, Mitchell Jones, Gail Kenmuir, Joyee King, Bronwyn Myers, Ruth Brown. The National Land and Water Resources Audit provided access to the BADES database. COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMERS © Commonwealth of Australia 2004 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Safari (4-6) Extensions
    Frisch’s Outreach: Australasian Safari (4-6) Extensions At a glance This program will allow your students to learn about the Geography and Climate of Australia and Southeast Asia. Goal islands, learn where these This class is designed to familiarize habitats are located. students with Australia and Southeast The students will understand how Asia. The students will learn what its the program animal lives and climate is like, what types of animals survives in its habitat. live there and how they survive. The student will be able to identify what is the range of the Objectives program animal. The students will gain an understanding of the basic Theme features of maps and how to read The Australasian region has a them. unique geography that has an The students will know where impact on its wildlife. the major geographic features of Australia and Southeast Asia are Sub-themes located. What types of habitats are found The students will be able to in Australasia. identify what types of habitats What adaptations do animals are found on the Australian and have to survive in their habitats. Southeast Asian continents and Title (X-X): Extensions Page 1 of 7 Academic standards Science Standards Ohio Science Academic Grade 7 Earth and Space Sciences Content Standards Benchmark C-8, Grade 10 Life Sciences Benchmark E-14, Benchmark F-14,16,17, Benchmark G-18,19, Grade 11 Earth and Space Sciences Benchmark B-4, Benchmark C-12, Life Sciences Benchmark E-6,8, Grade 12 Earth and Space Sciences Benchmark B-5, Life Sciences Benchmark C-12 Benchmark E-7,8,
    [Show full text]
  • Human Refugia in Australia During the Last Glacial Maximum and Terminal Pleistocene: a Geospatial Analysis of the 25E12 Ka Australian Archaeological Record
    Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013) 4612e4625 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Human refugia in Australia during the Last Glacial Maximum and Terminal Pleistocene: a geospatial analysis of the 25e12 ka Australian archaeological record Alan N. Williams a,*, Sean Ulm b, Andrew R. Cook c, Michelle C. Langley d, Mark Collard e a Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Building 48, Linnaeus Way, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia b Department of Anthropology, Archaeology and Sociology, School of Arts and Social Sciences, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia c School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia d Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, United Kingdom e Human Evolutionary Studies Program and Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada article info abstract Article history: A number of models, developed primarily in the 1980s, propose that Aboriginal Australian populations Received 13 February 2013 contracted to refugia e well-watered ranges and major riverine systems e in response to climatic Received in revised form instability, most notably around the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (w23e18 ka). We evaluate these 3 June 2013 models using a comprehensive continent-wide dataset of archaeological radiocarbon ages and geospatial Accepted 17 June 2013 techniques. Calibrated median radiocarbon ages are allocated to over-lapping time slices, and then K-means cluster analysis and cluster centroid and point dispersal pattern analysis are used to define Keywords: Minimum Bounding Rectangles (MBR) representing human demographic patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management in the Kimberley and Other Rangeland Regions of Western Australia
    Fire Management in the Kimberley and other Rangeland Regions of Western Australia Advice of the Environmental Protection Authority to the Minister for the Environment under Section 16(e) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 1243 December 2006 Strategic Advice Timelines Date Progress stages 12 July 2005 Request for advice from Minister for the Environment 21 October 2005 Release of Issues Paper prepared by Dr Jeremy Russell- Smith for the EPA Fire Review Committee for 8 weeks 7-10 and 28-30 EPA Fire Review Committee conducts initial round of November 2005 consultations in the Pilbara and Kimberley regions 19 December 2005 Close of public comment period on Issues Paper 20 March 2006 Initial consultation in Kalgoorlie 22 May 2006 Release of Synopsis and accompanying Appendix for public consultation for 3 months 21 July 2006 EPA Fire Review Committee conducts second round of consultations in Kalgoorlie 27 July 2006 Teleconference with EPA Fire Review Committee and pastoralists 7-11 August 2006 EPA Fire Review Committee conducts second round of consultation in the Kimberley region and Darwin 11 August 2006 Close of public comment period on Synopsis Paper 4 December 2006 EPA section 16(e) advice released Report Released: 29 November 2006 There is no appeal period on s16(e) advice. ISBN. 0 7307 6882 1 ISSN. 1030 – 0120 The Environmental Protection Authority acknowledges the significant contribution of the following people in preparing this Review. FIRE REVIEW COMMITTEE
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL ECOLOGICAL ZONES for FAO FOREST REPORTING: 2010 Update
    Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 179 GLOBAL ECOLOGICAL ZONES FOR FAO FOREST REPORTING: 2010 UPDate NOVEMBER, 2012 Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 179 Global ecological zones for FAO forest reporting: 2010 Update FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2012 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. All rights reserved. FAO encourages the reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. Contents Acknowledgements v Executive Summary vi Acronyms vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The GEZ 2000 map 1 2. Methods 6 2.1 The GEZ 2010 map update.
    [Show full text]
  • North Australian Pastoralists and Graziers Are Ready for Contractual Biodiversity Conservation
    North Australian pastoralists and graziers are ready for contractual biodiversity conservation Romy Greiner Charles Darwin University 28 April 2014 All photographs taken by the presenter unless otherwise attributed Purpose of the research . Develop a grazing industry perspective: Snapshot of what graziers and pastoralists think. Conservation for enterprise/income diversification? What conservation models would work? Where? How? What are preferred contractual conditions? . Establish foundation for a strategic industry position on potential supply of environmental services. Enhance the ability of potential investors to understand the needs of pastoralists. Support market formation and negotiations about the provision of contractual biodiversity conservation by pastoralists. Research area Bioregions as per colloquial reference but aligned with interim biogeographic regionalisation for Australia, version 7 (DE, 2013); E.U.=’Einasleigh Uplands’; V.R.D.=’Victoria River District’. ‘Einasleigh Uplands’ also includes directly adjacent areas of Cape York and Desert Uplands; ‘Gulf Plains’ also includes Mount Isa Inlier and parts of Mitchell Grass Downs; ‘Barkly’ comprises western parts of Mitchell Grass Downs, Davenport Murchison Ranges and eastern parts of Tanami; ‘Sturt’ also includes western parts of Gulf Falls and Uplands; Victoria River District’ comprises Ord Victoria Plain and Victoria Bonaparte; ‘Kimberley’ comprises Northern Kimberley, Central Kimberley and Dampierland. Survey response Total QLD NT WA (n=104) (n=61) (n=25) (n=18) Property
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia
    Preliminary Agency Statement of Natural Resource Management Priorities in Western Australia Department of Agriculture Department of Conservation and Land Management Department of Environment Department of Fisheries November 2003 “Results contained within this report do not represent a final priority listing of assets for investment, but provide a starting point or guide for further discussion and investigations that will contribute to a final investment decision.” Acknowledgments Contribution Personnel Title Organisation Team Leader Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Eve Bunbury Manager, Marine Planning Department of Fisheries Report Preparation Keith Claymore Senior Policy Advisor Department of Conservation and Land Management Report Preparation Verity Klemm Restoration and Management Department of Environment Section Manager Report Preparation Damien McAlinden Natural Resource Management Department of Environment Officer Report Preparation Brendan Nicholas Research Officer, Esperance Department of Agriculture Office Report Preparation Noel Schoknecht Unit Manager for Natural Department of Agriculture Resources Report Preparation Rob Tregonning Senior Policy Officer, Department of Fisheries Environmental Assessment Report Preparation Ian Watson Advisor, Land Management Department of Agriculture Report Preparation Gordon Wyre Acting Director, Nature Department of Conservation and Conservation Land Management For more information contact: Verity Klemm Catchment Management
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia, Version 7 Data Used Are Assumed to Be Correct As Received from the Data Suppliers
    ARC Arnhem Coast ARP Arnhem Plateau TIW AUA Australian Alps AVW Avon Wheatbelt DARWIN BBN Brigalow Belt North ARC BBS Brigalow Belt South BEL Ben Lomond ITI DAC PCK ARP BHC Broken Hill Complex CEA BRT Burt Plain CAR Carnarvon ARC CEA Central Arnhem DAB CYP CEK Central Kimberley CER Central Ranges NOK VIB CHC Channel Country CMC Central Mackay Coast GUC COO Coolgardie GFU STU COP Cobar Peneplain COS Coral Sea CEK CYP Cape York Peninsula OVP DAB Daly Basin DAC Darwin Coastal DAL WET GUP EIU DAL Dampierland DEU Desert Uplands DMR Davenport Murchison Ranges COS DRP Darling Riverine Plains DMR TAN EIU Einasleigh Uplands MII ESP Esperance Plains GSD EYB Eyre Yorke Block FIN Finke FLB Flinders Lofty Block CMC FUR Furneaux BRT GAS Gascoyne PIL DEU GAW Gawler MGD BBN GES Geraldton Sandplains GFU Gulf Fall and Uplands MAC GID Gibson Desert LSD GID GSD Great Sandy Desert GUC Gulf Coastal GUP Gulf Plains CAR GAS CER FIN CHC GVD Great Victoria Desert HAM Hampton ITI Indian Tropical Islands SSD JAF Jarrah Forest KAN Kanmantoo KIN King GVD LSD Little Sandy Desert STP BBS MUR SEQ MAC MacDonnell Ranges MUL BRISBANE MAL Mallee MDD Murray Darling Depression YAL MGD GES Mitchell Grass Downs STP MII Mount Isa Inlier MUL Mulga Lands NUL MUR Murchison NAN Nandewar GAW NET NCP Naracoorte Coastal Plain SWA COO NAN NET New England Tablelands AVW HAM BHC DRP NNC NSW North Coast FLB NOK Northern Kimberley PERTH COP NSS NSW South Western Slopes MDD NNC NUL Nullarbor MAL EYB OVP Ord Victoria Plain PCK Pine Creek JAF ESP SYB PIL Pilbara ADELAIDE SYDNEY PSI PSI Pacific
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse Contents
    Extract from Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse Contents © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 Suggested citation This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for Bastin G and the ACRIS Management Committee, study, research or training purposes subject to the Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse, published on inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and behalf of the ACRIS Management Committee by the no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for National Land & Water Resources Audit, Canberra. purposes other than those above requires written Acknowledgments permission from the Commonwealth. Requests should be addressed to: Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse is the work of many people who have provided data and information that Assistant Secretary has been incorporated into this report. It has been Biodiversity Conservation Branch possible due to signicant in-kind contributions from the Department of the Environment,Water, Heritage State andTerritory governments and funding from the and the Arts Australian Government through the Natural Heritage GPO Box 787 Trust. Particular thanks are due to sta of the Desert Canberra ACT 2601 Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre, including Australia Melissa Schliebs,Ange Vincent and Craig James. Disclaimer Cover photograph This report was prepared by the ACRIS Management West MacDonnell Ranges (photo Department of Unit and the ACRIS Management Committee.The the Environment,Water, Heritage and the Arts) views it contains are not necessarily those of the Australian Government or of state or territory Principal author: Gary Bastin, CSIRO and Desert governments.The Commonwealth does not accept Knowledge CRC responsibility in respect of any information or advice Technical editor: Dr John Ludwig given in relation to or as a consequence of anything Editors: Biotext Pty Ltd contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Protected Areas - IBRA Boundaries
    Appendix 7 Terrestrial protected areas - IBRA boundaries AA Australian Alps TIW ARC Arnhem Coast Terrestrial Protected Areas - ARP Arnhem Plateau ARC AW Avon Wheatbelt 80,895,099 hectares (10.52%) BBN Brigalow Belt North DARWIN BBS Brigalow Belt South DAC ARP BEL Ben Lomond PCK CA BHC Broken Hill Complex BRT Burt Plain CA Central Arnhem DAB CYP CAR Carnarvon CHC Channel Country NK VB CK Central Kimberley GUC CMC Central Mackay Coast GFU COO Coolgardie STU CP Cobar Peneplain CR Central Ranges CK OVP CYP Cape York Peninsula DAB Daly Basin DL WT DAC Darwin Coastal GUP EIU DEU Desert Uplands DL Dampierland DMR Davenport Murchison Ranges DMR DRP Darling Riverine Plains TAN EIU Einasleigh Uplands MII ESP Esperance Plains GSD EYB Eyre Yorke Block FIN Finke FLB Flinders Lofty Block MGD BRT CMC FLI Flinders PIL DEU GAS Gascoyne BBN GAW Gawler GD Gibson Desert MAC GFU Gulf Fall and Uplands LSD GD GS Geraldton Sandplains GSD Great Sandy Desert CR FIN GUC Gulf Coastal CAR GAS GUP Gulf Plains CHC GVD Great Victoria Desert HAM Hampton SSD JF Jarrah Forest BBS KAN Kanmantoo SEQ KIN King STP ML LSD Little Sandy Desert MUR GVD BRISBANE MAC MacDonnell Ranges MAL Mallee MDD Murray Darling Depression GS YA L MGD Mitchell Grass Downs MII Mount Isa Inlier ML Mulga Lands NUL MUR Murchison NAN NAN Nandewar GAW DRP NET NCP Naracoorte Coastal Plain AW COO BHC NET New England Tablelands FLB NK Northern Kimberley PERTH HAM CP NNC NSW North Coast NSS NSW South Western Slopes SWA NNC MAL EYB NUL Nullarbor OVP Ord Victoria Plain JF SB PCK Pine Creek ESP NSS PIL Pilbara RIV SYDNEY RIV Riverina ADELAIDE SB Sydney Basin SEH ± WAR MDD SCP South East Coastal Plain 200100 0 200 400 KAN SEC South East Corner SEH South Eastern Highlands NCP AA SEQ South Eastern Queensland Kilometres VM SSD Simpson Strzelecki Dunefields Sources: STP Stony Plains IBRA 6.1 - IBRA Version 6.1 (2004), Australian Government Department of the Environment and VVP SEC STU Sturt Plateau Heritage through compilation of State/Territory SCP SWA Swan Coastal Plain datasets.
    [Show full text]