DOCSLIB.ORG

Oriya-Speaking Feudatory States and Their Amalgamation with Orissa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oriya-Speaking Feudatory States and Their Amalgamation with Orissa Orissa Review * April - 2006 Oriya-Speaking Feudatory States and their Amalgamation with Orissa Dr. Hemanta Kumar Mohapatra In India there were at least twenty six feudatory of Central Province, was created. Its states with a pre-dominant Oriya-speaking headquarters was first situated at Ranchi and then population.1 In fact these states were not shifted to Calcutta. The Agency was administered sovereign. They were being ruled by the chiefs by a Resident to be controlled by the Political under British paramountcy. As per the Sanads Department, Government of India. This signed by Lord Elgin, the then Viceroy and arrangement continued till the end of the British Governor General of India, the Chiefs of the rule in India. Tributary Mahals of Orissa were formally But inspite of the British instruction not recognised as Feudatory chiefs in 1894.2 Their to oppress the States subjects, the Feudatory sons and successors were entitled to such Chiefs were found to have resorted to arbitrary privileges and liable to obligations. But it was rule and defective administrative system which led clearly pointed out in the sands that no succession to large scale suffering of the common people should be valid until it had been recognised by His Excellency the viceroy and Governor General there. This state of affairs provoked serious in Council.3 In the revised Sanads issued by Lord reactions amongst the people. They were allergic Minto in 1908 the British relationship with the to the illegal and forcible exactions like Rasad, Feudatory chiefs was redefined. As per the Magan, Bethi and Begari. There were resistance Sanads the Feudatory Chiefs were directed to movements in the states against these exactions. pronounce justice 'fairly and impartially' to all But they were suppressed by the Rajas (as the alike. They were also directed to consult the Feudatory Chiefs were called) with strong hands. commissioner of Orissa Division in all important During the Non-cooperation and Civil matters of administration and comply with his Disobedience Movements against the British decisions.4 Thus the Feudatory Chiefs were rulers in India, organised by the Indian National allowed to rule their States strictly under the British Congress, the Feudatory States of Orissa Paramountcy. remained calm. They were indifferent towards The administrative set-up of the States these national movements as they were struggling was further overhauled in 1933 in order to bring for their own survival vis-a-vis the arbitrary and the States directly under the Government of India. despotic rulers. During the Civil Disobedience The Eastern States Agency, comprising of twenty Movement of 1930-32 attempts were made to six Feudatory State of Orissa and fourteen States organise the people of the States. Accordingly, 45 Orissa Review * April - 2006 the 'Orissa States People Conference' was Balwant Ray Mehta and Lalmohan Patnaik. The convened at Cuttack. But it attracted little committee submitted its report in 1939. The response and was of no success. The second findings of this committee was shocking. The sad session of the Orissa State Peopl's Conference state of affairs in the Feudatory States, thus was also held at Cuttack on 23 June, 1937 under revealed, provoked serious attention in the country the presidentship of Dr. Pattavi Sitaramaya. He and abroad. It unveiled the miserable plight of encouraged the States people to form Congress the subjects and exposed the ineffective Committees and start a mass contact administration and prevailing lawlessness in the programme.5 The conference urged upon the States. The Committee suggested certain rulers of the States to abolish illegal exactions. It measures to restore normalcy in the States. Such also appointed a committee with Satish Chandra measures included the transfer of power of Bose, Balwant Rai Mehta and Brajasundar Das supervision over administration of the States from as its members. Sri Sarangdhar Das was the British Resident to Provincial Government.9 These convenor of this committee. This committee was recommendations created a flutter in the Ruler's to investigate and report on such illegal practices.6 dovecot and also amongst the Officers of the This conference was an august beginning in the political Department.10 The report of this path of formation of political association in the committee was also considered as the 'origin' of States. The awekening of the people in the States the idea of merger of the States with the received a further impetus with the formation of province.11 the popular Congress Ministry in Orissa in the month of July, 1937. Mahtab's Approach to the Problems in the States : In this background, a new movement named Prajamandal Movement started in the Describing the role of Mahtab in the States in 1938. Prajamandals or people's solution of the problems of the States, Durga Das Associations were formed in most of the States wrote, "Narrating the story of the first Merget and the leaders of these associations put forward Patel told me that the idea had originated with 12 charter of demands which include the abolition of Harekrushna Mahtab." as the Chairman of the numerous feudal exactions.7 Their charter of Orissa States Enquiry Committee, he demands included civil liberties like right to form recommended that the States be brought under free associations, right to expression and freedom the Provincial Government. Mahtab took up the of press. They also wanted enactment of just laws matter with the Governor General of India, Lord for their agricultural holdings, for the utilisation of Linlithgow when he came to Orissa in August, the forest products, abolition of monopoly trade 1939. Linlithgow admitted that there was no practices.8 The Prajamandals adopted agitational geographical boundary between British Orissa tactices to get their demands redressed and and Orissa States.13 Mahtab also took up this consequent revolts broke out in places like Nilgiri, matter with Cripps when he came to India as the Talcher and Dhenkanal. When these movements head of a Mission in 1942. The Political were going on unabated, the Orissa States Enquiry Department of the Government of India agreed Committee was reconstituted in 1938 with that the 'merger' was the only feasible solution of Harekrushna Mahtab as its Chairman. The other the emerging problems of the States.14 But no step members of the reconstituted committee were was taken in this respect. 46 Orissa Review * April - 2006 Mahtab also met the Cabinet Mission on bear the same meaning and implications. It did 6 April, 1946. As the prospective Prime Minister not mean subordination of one to the other. He of Orissa he put-forth his arguments in a appealed to the rulers that in the interest of the memorandum substantiated by a specially States, it would be best thing to merge with the prepared map showing how districts of Orissa province and bring about a common were islands in an ocean of States.15 The administration.19 memorandum was published on behalf of the But the reaction and response of the rulers Provincial Congress Committee. It strongly were not encouraging. Rather they tried to advocated for amalgamation of the Garjats with underscore the fundamental issue by raising petty the province of Orissa. On 26 April, 1946 Mahtab matters and complicating the whole issue. Even a wrote to Sir Stafford Cripps (then a member of petty ruler like N.C.B.M. Mahapatra of the Cabinet Mission) showing his interest in the Baramba20 made a baseless counter attack saying amalgamation of twenty six Orissa States with the 16 that the British districts which formed the province province of Orissa. The Cabinet Mission was of Orissa were one time States under the rulers deeply impressed with his arguments and a and he suggested that all those should be restored statement was issued by the mission on 16 May, to their former position.21 P.K. Deo, the 1946. In this statement it was contemplated that Maharaja of Kalahandi accused Mahtab for his a satisfactory solution to the problems of the Indian Parsuram like attitude and warned him that unless States would be achieved by mutual 17 he give up such attitude 'no fruitful decision can negotiations. be arrived at' in their meeting at this stage.22 When this question of negotiation The hostile attitude towards the rule was emerged, Mahtab took up the matter straight with completely exposed when in the month of July, the rulers of Orissa States. He wrote to them on 1946 they met in a conference at Alipore and 10 May, 1946 and again on 29 June, 1946 in decided to form a Federal Union of Chhatishgarh order to Convince them about the benefit of the and Orissa States. A Special Committee was set- mutual cooperation. In the first letter he up to expedite its formation. The British Resident rationalised his previous view of amalgamation of the Eastern States Agency was present in the stating that in the interest of both the states and conference and encouraged such a move.23 the province there should be some sort of coordination without which it was clear that neither In spite of such hostile attitude of the the States nor the province could prosper in that rulers, Mahtab did not give up hope of some circumstances.18 In the same letter he hoped that understanding with the rulling chiefs. On 16 if the resources of the States and the province October, 1946 he met some of them at Sambalpur could be pooled together in a reasonable way, and in the presence of the Political Agent tried to Orissa would be one of the richest provinces of impress upon them about the necessity of one India. administration for both the States and the province.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER VI (Contd.) Section-II Review of Economic Activities and Financial Position of the State
    ( 283) CHAPTER VI (Contd.) Section-II Review of Economic Activities and Financial Position of the State The economy of the Princely State of Gooch Behar, some scholars held, was of a static semi-feudal nature, heavily dependent upon traditional agriculture in pre-British days. The minimum daily needs of the people could be met with the meagre resource available to them within the State.' But there was merely subsistence living and no economic prosperity and social mobility in the State. There was a lack of transport and communication and no foreign contact. Hence no trade and commerce could develop either within the State or with the outside world.' With the conclusion of a treaty between the Coach Behar State and the English East India Company in 1773 (which was in the latter's favour), this intercourse began to generate its impact on the traditional economic set up of this region and the consequent change followed the logic of history. The reign of Harendra Narayan (1783 -1839) had set the stage for change. The State of Coach Behar came into direct contact with the British administration. From then onwards the land tenure system and land revenue settlement began to be geared into motion and the traditional agrarian economy of the state started shaking off its age old slumber.3 Before the arrival of the English East India Company and at the initial period of their rule the economy of Bengal was mainly dependent on agriculture and artisan industry.' But British policy brought about a commercial revolution, estalished a new economy and bound India's economy to the heels of the British economy, the process of deindustrialisation commenced' and gradually India was converted into a centre for the supply of raw-materials for British industries and a market for the import of British manufactured articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Care and Human Rights
    Mental Health Care and Human Rights Editors D Nagaraja Pratima Murthy National Human Rights Commission New Delhi National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences Bangalore Title: Mental Health Care and Human Rights D Nagaraja Pratima Murthy Technical and Editorial Assistance Y S R Murthy, Director (Research), NHRC Utpal Narayan Sarkar, AIO, NHRC Joint copyright: National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi and National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore. First Edition: 2008 All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holders ISBN- 978-81-9044117-5 Published by: National Human Rights Commission Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg New Delhi 110 001, India Tel: 23385368 Fax: 23384863 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nhrc.nic.in Design and printed by Rajika Press Services Pvt. Ltd. Cover: Biplab Kundu Table of Contents Editors and Contributors............................................................... 5 Foreword........................................................................................ 7 Preface............................................................................................ 9 Editors’ Introduction.................................................................... 11 Section 1 Human rights in mental health care: ........................................... 15 an introduction Lakshmidhar
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Asiatic Society
    ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN & IRELAND (FOUNDED MARCH, 1823) LIST OF MEMBERS 1959 PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY 56 QUEEN ANNE STREET LONDON W. 1 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 30 Sep 2021 at 11:37:45, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00117630 PRESIDENTS OF THE SOCIETY SINCE ITS FOUNDATION 1823 RT. HON. CHARLES WATKIN WILLIAMS WYNN, M.P. 1841 RT. HON. THE EARL OF MUNSTER. 1842 RT. HON. THE LORD FITZGERALD AND VESEY. 1843 RT. HON. THE EARL OF AUCKLAND. 1849 RT. HON. THE EARL OF ELLESMERE. 1852 RT. HON. THE EARL ASHBURTON. 1855 PROFESSOR HORACE HAYMAN WILSON. 1859 COLONEL WILLIAM HENRY SYKES, M.P. 1861 RT. HON. THE VISCOUNT STRANGFORD. 1864 SIR THOMAS EDWARD COLEBROOKE, BART., M.P. 1867 RT. HON. THE VISCOUNT STRANGFORD. 1869 SIR T. E. COLEBROOKE, BART. 1869 MAJOR-GENERAL SIR HENRY CRESWICKE RAWLINSON, BART. 1871 SIR T. E. COLEBROOKE, BART. 1872 SIR HENRY BARTLE EDWARD FRERE. 1875 SIR T. E. COLEBROOKE, BART. 1878 MAJOR-GENERAL SIR H. C. RAWLINSON, BART. 1881 SIR T. E. COLEBROOKE, BART. 1882 SIR H. B. E. FRERE. 1884 SIR WILLIAM MUIR. 1885 COLONEL SIR HENRY YULE. 1887 SIR THOMAS FRANCIS WADE. 1890 RT. HON. THE EARL OF NORTHBROOK. 1893 RT. HON. THE LORD REAY. 1921 LIEUT.-COL. SIR RICHARD CARNAC TEMPLE. BART. 1922 RT. HON. THE LORD CHALMERS. 1925 SIR EDWARD D. MACLAGAN. 1928 THE MOST HON. THE MARQUESS OF ZETLAND. 1931 SIR E.
    [Show full text]
  • About Chhattisgarh
    About Chhattisgarh Map Chhatisgarh state and districts (Stand 2007) At the time of separation from Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh originally had 16 districts. Two new districts: Bijapur and Narayanpur were carved out on May 11, 2007[1] and nine new districts on Jan 1, 2012. The new districts have been created by carving out the existing districts to facilitate more targeted, focused and closer administration. These districts have been named Sukma, Kondagaon, Balod, Bemetara, Baloda Bazar, Gariaband, Mungeli, Surajpur and Balrampur[2] Contents [hide] 1 Background 2 Administrative history 3 Districts of Chhattisgarh 4 References 5 External links Background[edit] A district of an Indian state is an administrative geographical unit, headed by a district magistrate or a deputy commissioner, an officer belonging to the Indian Administrative Service. The district magistrate or the deputy commissioner is assisted by a number of officials belonging to different wings of the administrative services of the state. A superintendent of Police, an officer belonging to Indian Police Service is entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining law and order and related issues. Administrative history Before Indian independence, present-day Chhattisgarh state was divided between the Central Provinces and Berar, a province of British India, and a number of princely states in the north, south, and east, which were part of the Eastern States Agency. The British province encompassed the central portion of the state, and was made up of three districts, Raipur, Bilaspur, and Durg, which made up the Chhattisgarh Division of the Central Provinces. Durg District was created in 1906 out of the eastern portion of Raipur District.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Xi Orissa
    CENOl.T~ 0~~ li~DIA, 1951 VOLUME XI ORISSA PART 1-REP\.R'·' M. AHMED, M.A. · Superintende: 1: oi Censils Operations )rissa CUTTAUJ~ SUPERINTENDENT, OrussA GovF iflmNT PRBSS . 1958 CENSUS OF INDIA, 1951 VOLUME XI ORISSA Part 1-Report . ai't:l~ CENSUS OF INDIA, 1951. VOLUME XI ORISSA PART I-REPORT M. AHMED, M.A. Superintendent of Census Operations Orissa OUT'l'AOX 8lJl'liBIHTBlQ)~. OmasA Go'VBBRJIBJI'I Pus• ~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION • .1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE-Geographical Setting-Physical Configuration-Rivers-Cross-Section of Orissa 1-4 II. BRIEF IDSTORY OF THE J,.AND AND THE PEOPLE 4-6 m. dHANGE IN AREA 7 • IV. POPULATION ZONES.. AND NATURAL DIVISIONS 7-9 V. GEOLOGY AND MINERALS-Geological Outline-Mining : Early History­ Slow Unmethodical Development-Mineral Resources-Orissa Inland. Division -Orissa Coastal Division-Economic Minerals-Iron-Coal-Manganese­ Bauxite-Chromite-Limestone-Mica-Glasss-and-Vanadium-0 t h. e r Minerals .• 9-15 VI. THE SOIL-Constituents-The Northern Plateau-The Eastern Ghats Region....:.. The Central Tract-The Coastal Division-Soil Erosion 15-17 VII. CLIMATE AND RAINFALL-Orissa Inland Division-Orissa Co.astal Division_:_ Rainfall.Satatistics .. 17-20 VIII. FORESTS-Area-Classification-Districtwise Distribution-Extent-Income and Forest Produce •• 21-23' CHAPTER !-General Population @ SECTION 1-Preliminary .Remarks Population-Comparison with Other States-Reference to Statistics-Non-census Data Inadequate and Erroneous-Indispensability of up-to-date Statistics ·•• 25-27 SECTION 11-General Distribution and Density Comparison with In(lia-Comparison with other States-Comparison with other Countries -Average Density-Thinly Populated Areas-Thickly Populated Areas-Orissa Inland Division-Orissa Coastal Division-Disparity in Density between two Natural Divisions -Increase in Density-Distribution by Districts-Distribution by Police-stations •.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 18 History of Odisha
    DDCE/History (M.A)/SLM/Paper-18 HISTORY OF ODISHA (FROM 1803 TO 1948 A.D.) By Dr. Manas Kumar Das CONTENT HISTORY OF ODISHA (From 1803 TO 1948 A.D.) Unit.No. Chapter Name Page No UNIT- I. a. British Occupation of Odisha. b. British Administration of Odisha: Land Revenue Settlements, administration of Justice. c. Economic Development- Agriculture and Industry, Trade and Commerce. UNIT.II. a. Resistance Movements in the 19th century- Khurda rising of 1804-05, Paik rebellion of 1817. b. Odisha during the revolt of 1857- role of Surendra Sai c. Tribal uprising- Ghumsar Rising under Dara Bisoi, Khond Rising under Chakra Bisoi, Bhuyan Rising Under Ratna Naik and Dharani Dhar Naik. UNIT – III. a. Growth of Modern Education, Growth of Press and Journalism. b. Natural Calamities in Odisha, Famine of 1866- its causes and effect. c. Social and Cultural changes in the 19th Century Odisha. d. Mahima Dharma. UNIT – IV. a. Oriya Movement: Growth of Socio-Political Associations, Growth of Public Associations in the 19th Century, Role of Utkal Sammilini (1903-1920) b. Nationalist Movement in Odisha: Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience Movements in Odisha. c. Creation of Separate province, Non-Congress and Congress Ministries( 1937-1947). d. Quit India Movement. e. British relation with Princely States of Odisha and Prajamandal Movement and Merger of the States. UNIT-1 Chapter-I British Occupation of Odisha Structure 1.1.0. Objectives 1.1.1. Introduction 1.1.2. British occupation of Odisha 1.1.2.1. Weakness of the Maratha rulers 1.1.2.2. Oppression of the land lords 1.1.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAGT'e of NATIONS Communicated to the Council And
    LEAGT'E OF NATIONS Communicated to the C.11.M.11.1946.XI. Council and the Members (0.C/A.K.1942/57) of the League. ANNEX (Issued in English only). Geneva, January 22nd, 1946. TRAFFIC IN OPIUM AND OTHER DANGEROUS DRUGS. ANNUAL REPORTS BY GOVERNMENTS FOR 1942. INDIAN STATES. Communicated by the Government of India. Note by the Acting,. Secretary-General. In accordance with Article 21 of. the Convention of 1931 for limiting the Manufacture and regulating the Distribution of Narcotic Drugs, the Acting Secretary-General has the honour to communicate the above-mentioned report to the parties to the Convention. The report is also communicated to other States and to the Advisory Committee on Traffic in Opium and other Dangerous Drugs. (For the form of annual reports, see document.0.C .1600). NOTE ON PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, IMPORT AND EXPORT, ETC. OF OPIUM AND OTHER DANGEROUS DRUGS IN INDIAN STATES RELATING TO THE YEAR 1942.. NOTE.- Wherever figures for the calendar year‘-1942 are not available they have been given for the Hindi Sammat 1999 which corresponds closely to the British Indian financial year 1942-43. In certain cases they have.also been given for the State financial year 1941-42 which generally began either from October 1st or November 1 st, 1941. 1. General position regarding use., manufacture and sale of each drug separately.- The position during the year under report was practically the same as reported in the ’Note' for the previous year. The States are now fully conscious of the evil effects of drug addiction and the measures which they have adopted to suppress this pernicious habit have been-satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • British Relations with the Princely States of Odisha (1905-1947)
    Odisha Review ISSN 0970-8669 The princely or feudatory states, their evolution, therefore, in spirit were the part and parcel of the contact with the British, internal administration and British Empire in India. The people of the princely the movements emerged there known as the states were completely ignorant about the day to Prajamandal movement formed an important day happenings of the outer world. The ruler had aspect of the colonial history of Odisha. Without unrestrained power over the public revenue for referring to them, the history of Odisha during the personal use. The people of the princely states British or the colonial rule would be incomplete. were subjected to some obnoxious systems like During the British rule, there were 26 princely bethi (free / forced labour), begari (free carriage states (Garjats) in Odisha which were spread of luggage of raja or his officers), magan (free / over such a vast area that they constituted more forced contribution both in cash and kind), rasad than half of the present state of Odisha. These (free supply of ration/ food), suniya bethi (new states were situated mostly in hilly tracts and were year gift), abwals (gifts and presents made to the inaccessible. The British did not prefer to intervene palace on different occasions of feasts and in the internal affairs of these states; as a result, festivals) etc. All these hardships consequently British Relations with the Princely States of Odisha (1905-1947) Sunita Panigrahy the political development in these states has a led to growing discontentment and opposition from characteristic of its own. The local Rajas or the the people not only against the autocratic princely princely rulers, ruling over the princely states, rulers but also against the British imperialism which however, were responsible for their own internal became popular in history as Prajamandal administration to the British.
    [Show full text]
  • List of WDRA Registered Warehouses As on 18-09-2019 Registration S
    List of WDRA Registered Warehouses as on 18-09-2019 Registration S. No. State Name and Address Warehouseman Name Mobile Capacity WH Code Valid Upto Date CW Kadapa,CW Rims Road,Yerramukkapally, Kadapa , Distt- 1 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 25000 3030031 08-05-2018 07-05-2023 Y.S.R. CW Ongole,Central Warehouse, Throvagunta P.O.,Ongole , 2 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 10000 2390021 06-04-2018 05-04-2023 Distt-Prakasam CW Tadepalligudem,Nallajarla Road,Tadepalligudem , Distt- 3 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 72000 2350023 05-04-2018 04-04-2023 West Godavari 4 ANDHRA PRADESH CW, RENIGUNTA,Airport road,Renigunta, , Distt-Chittoor Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 20000 3950015 05-07-2018 04-07-2023 CW Ananthapur,C/O AP Oil fed,Tapovanam, Ananthapur , 5 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 7700 3270026 23-05-2018 22-05-2023 Distt-Anantapur APSWC, JAGGAIAHPET,BESIDE MARKET YARD,KODAD ROAD , ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 6 ANDHRA PRADESH 9849059571 9150 8551020 06-09-2019 05-09-2024 Distt-Krishna WAREHOUSING CORPORATION CW Vijayawada II,76-15-8,Opposite Out Agency. 7 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 15000 2810011 01-05-2018 30-04-2023 Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada , Distt-Krishna CW Nandikotkur,K.G Road,Beside Market Yard, Nandikotkur , 8 ANDHRA PRADESH Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 10000 2310022 02-04-2018 01-04-2023 Distt-Kurnool 9 ANDHRA PRADESH CW,KAKINADA,New port area, Kakinada, , Distt-East Godavari Central Warehousing Corporation 9535724444 30000 4010019 10-07-2018 09-07-2023 10 ANDHRA PRADESH CW Kaikalur,Atapaka, Kaikalur,Krishna Dist.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. III 1 Ch. 16-D PART D.—MISCELLANEOUS 1
    Vol. III 1 Ch. 16-D PART D.—MISCELLANEOUS 1. It should be noted that section 54(1) seventhly, of Power of the Code of Criminal Procedure, authorises police officers Police to to arrest, without an order from a Magistrate and arrest without a warrant, persons liable under any law relating without warrant. to extradition or under the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881, to apprehension or detention in British India on account of offences committed at any place out of British India. Such persons may, under sections 23 of the Extradition Act, 1903 be detained under the orders of a Magistrate, within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the arrest was made, in . the same manner and subject to the same restrictions as a person arrested on a warrant issued by such Magistrate under section 10. 1-A The following instructions have been issued by Provincial Government :— States which have agreed to It has been brought to the notice of the Punjab the procedure laid down as to Government that applications made by the Police of the requisition of India States for the arrest of fugitive offenders from Police for fugi- tives. their territories under the provisions of the seventh clause of section 54(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code are sometimes accompanied by no details which would assist the Magistrate before whom the alleged offender is produced to decide whether he should be released on bail or not. The Magistrate is thus placed in an un-satisfactory position when extradition is delayed and it is necessary (1) All states in the Punjab State to grant remands under section 344 of the Criminal Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT in MANIPUR 1919-1949 DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY Political Science S. M. A. W. CHISHTI Professor S. A. H. HAQOI
    POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN MANIPUR 1919-1949 iiBSTRACT OF THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN Political Science BY S. M. A. W. CHISHTI Under the Supervision of Professor S. A. H. HAQOI Head of the Department of Political Science FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH X&7B POLITICHL DEVELOPFtEM IN PlrtNlPUR, 1919-1949 The study deals with the political and constitutional deuelopments in the erstwhile princely State of C'lanipur from 1919 till its merger uith India in 1949. Bordered with Burma, she occupies one of the strategically situated states in the north-eastern region. In the uake of the political upheaval of 1891, Planipur lost her identity and became a protectorate of the British Government of India. Since the Flanipuri uprising of 1891 against the British Government, the^Kuki insurgency during 1917-19 uas the most significant political occurring dui-ing the entire period of the British rule in Manipur. The Kukis, one of the most powerful tribes of Fianipur, revolted against foreign domination. The administration uas very much upset by the disturbances in the hills. The Government felt considerably annoyed with frequent troubles which often resulted in losses of life and property. The Government could, however, bring the situation under control only in 1919, The experience of the Kuki rebellion made the British Government realise the inadequacy of the rules which wore framed for the administration cf flanipur State in 191G, The unrest among the Kacha Magas and the Kabul riagas of the north-uest of Manipur during the early l93CJs uas a turning point In the political hlctory of tribal rianlpur.
    [Show full text]
  • Extradition and Foreign Jurisdiction (Criminal Courts)
    CHAPTER 16 Ch. 16 Extradition and Foreign Jurisdiction (Criminal Courts) Part A] Part A EXTRADITION FROM BRITISH INDIA 1. Definition—Extradition means the surrender of a fugitive offender by one State to another in which the offender is liable to be punished or has been convicted. The law of extradition is based on the broad principle that it is in the interests of all nations that crimes recognised as such by the civilized world should not go unpunished. 2. Law applicable—The Indian Extradition Act, 1903, deals with the surrender of fugitive criminals to States outside the British Empire. The Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881, 44 and (45 Victs. 69) deals with the surrender of fugitive offenders as between British possessions. 3. Procedure for surrender of fugitives to Indian and Foreign States—The Indian Extradition Act, 1903, defines a “Foreign State” as a State to which the English Extradition Acts, 1870 and 1873 apply. These are certain foreign countries (mostly in Europe and America) with which the British Government has entered into extradition treaties and to which the English Extradition Acts have been applied by an Order-in-Council. The procedure for surrender of fugitive criminals to such “Foreign States” is laid down in Chapter II of the Indian Extradition Act (which has been declared a part of the English Extradition Act, 1870, by an Order-in-Council,— vide the appendix to this Chapter), while the procedure for surrender to States other than “Foreign States” is laid down in Chapter III of that Act. In the case of States other than “Foreign States” the procedure varies according as there is or is not an extradition treaty with the State concerned.
    [Show full text]