DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of Program Evaluation 1500 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33132

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of Program Evaluation 1500 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33132 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Office of Program Evaluation 1500 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33132 Evaluation of the School Improvement Zone 2006-07 January 2009 Principal Evaluator/Author: Steven M. Urdegar, Ph.D. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Dr. Solomon C. Stinson, Chair Dr. Marta Pérez, Vice Chair Mr. Agustin J. Barrera Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman Ms. Perla Tabares Hantman Mr. Renier Diaz de la Portilla Dr. Martin Karp Dr. Wilbert “Tee” Holloway Ms. Ana Rivas Logan Ms. Angelique Gayle, Student Advisor Mr. Alberto M. Carvalho Superintendent of Schools Jerome L. Levitt, Ph.D., Executive Director Office of Program Evaluation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This is to recognize the contribution of Mr. Fred Reed, Regional Coordinator of the William C. Golden School Leadership Program, who with his team of retired administrators Ms. Thelma Davis, Mr. Jose Enriquez, Ms. Darleen Mooney, Dr. Fred Morley, Dr. Robert Russell, Ms. Sue- Ann Wendover, and Ms. Willa Young availed us of more than two centuries of combined expertise by conducting classroom observations and school reviews that enabled us to further the knowledge base and scope of this evaluation. Special thanks are owed to Dr. Beverly Karrenbauer who served as both a team member and a mentor principal for the Zone for also helping to develop the practices instrument, and to Ms. Barbara Bell for helping us adapt the principals’ walkthrough. Finally, I would like to thank Ms. Lucia Herrera for allowing the team to participate in this effort, and in so doing, serving as an exemplar for interdepartmental collaboration. i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... vii DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM ................................................................................... 1 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE......................................................................................... 7 Educational Practices......................................................................................................... 7 Implementation ................................................................................................................ 10 Change and Diffusion ...................................................................................................... 13 Leadership ........................................................................................................................ 14 Contextual Factors ........................................................................................................... 15 Value Added Modeling.................................................................................................... 17 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 19 Implementation ................................................................................................................ 19 Learning Environment ..................................................................................................... 25 Student Achievement....................................................................................................... 28 Student Performance on the FCAT-NRT ................................................................. 29 Student Performance on the FCAT-SSS................................................................... 31 FCAT Writing............................................................................................................ 31 School Accountability Grades................................................................................... 32 Other Indicators Associated with Student Achievement.......................................... 33 Home-School and School-Community Relations........................................................... 34 Program Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 34 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 35 Implementation ................................................................................................................ 35 Return Rates............................................................................................................... 35 Resources ................................................................................................................... 37 Adherence .................................................................................................................. 38 Capacity ..................................................................................................................... 43 Differentiation............................................................................................................ 55 Leadership.................................................................................................................. 59 Discrepant Events...................................................................................................... 64 Learning Environment ..................................................................................................... 64 Student Achievement....................................................................................................... 68 Student Performance on the FCAT-NRT ................................................................. 68 Reading ................................................................................................................ 68 Mathematics......................................................................................................... 73 Student Performance on the FCAT/SSS................................................................... 78 Reading ................................................................................................................ 79 Mathematics......................................................................................................... 83 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS, (CONTINUED) Science ................................................................................................................. 88 Student Performance on the FCAT Writing Assessment......................................... 90 School Accountability Grades................................................................................... 92 Other Indicators Associated with Student Achievement.......................................... 93 School Characteristics ......................................................................................... 93 Teacher Movement.............................................................................................. 94 Pupil Progression................................................................................................. 95 Transitions ........................................................................................................... 96 Home, School, and Community Relations...................................................................... 97 Program Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 98 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................... 101 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 101 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 107 Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 108 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 109 APPENDIX A: Interview Protocols................................................................................... 115 APPENDIX B: Observation Instruments........................................................................... 119 APPENDIX C: Zone Stakeholder Surveys ........................................................................ 123 APPENDIX D: Reading Instruction and Leadership Survey ............................................ 131 APPENDIX E: School Climate Survey.............................................................................. 139 APPENDIX F: Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) Analysis....................................... 147 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of the School Improvement Zone, 2006-07 ......................2 Table 2: School Improvement Zone Schools by Feeder Pattern, 2006-07 .....................................3 Table 3: Schools in the Control Groups for the Analysis of Instruction and Leadership.............23 Table 4: Schools in the Control Groups for the Analysis of Learning Environment ...................27 Table 5: Schools in the Control Groups for the Analysis of Achievement on the FCAT-NRT.......................................................................................................................30 Table 6: Return
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Ori Inal Document. SCHOOL- CHOICE
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 460 188 UD 034 633 AUTHOR Moffit, Robert E., Ed.; Garrett, Jennifer J., Ed.; Smith, Janice A., Ed. TITLE School Choice 2001: What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-0-89195-100-8 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 275p.; For the 2000 report, see ED 440 193. Foreword by Howard Fuller. AVAILABLE FROM Heritage Foundation, 214 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC 20002-4999 ($12.95). Tel: 800-544-4843 (Toll Free). For full text: http://www.heritage.org/schools/. PUB TYPE Books (010) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; Charter Schools; Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Private Schools; Public Schools; Scholarship Funds; *School Choice ABSTRACT This publication tracks U.S. school choice efforts, examining research on their results. It includes: current publicschool data on expenditures, schools, and teachers for 2000-01 from a report by the National Education Association; a link to the states'own report cards on how their schools are performing; current private school informationfrom a 2001 report by the National Center for Education Statistics; state rankingson the new Education Freedom Index by the Manhattan Institute in 2000; current National Assessment of Educational Progress test results releasedin 2001; and updates on legislative activity through mid-July 2001. Afterdiscussing ways to increase opportunities for children to succeed, researchon school choice, and public opinion, a set of maps and tables offera snapshot of choice in the states. The bulk of the book containsa state-by-state analysis that examines school choice status; K-12 public schools andstudents; K-12 public school teachers; K-12 public and private school studentacademic performance; background and developments; position of the governor/composition of the state legislature; and statecontacts.
    [Show full text]
  • 0913-PT-A Section.Indd
    Racking up sales YOUR ONLINE LOCAL Netminder Recycling auto racks big biz DAILY NEWS Hawks’ Burke settles in — See SUSTAINABLE LIFE, C1 www.portlandtribune.com — See SPORTS, B10 PortlandPTHURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILYTribune PAPER • WWW.PORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED THURSDAY Counties, cities hit in rebate (P)RETIREMENT’S debate Local leaders balk as lawmaker seeks cuts NEW FRONTIER to job creation fund By JIM REDDEN The Tribune An infl uential Portland-ar- ea legislator thinks local and regional governments are owed too much money from state income taxes collected as part of their econom- ic develop- ment efforts. State Sen. Ginny Burdick, who repre- sents South- west Portland and parts of BURDICK Washington County, wants the 2013 Legislature to recon- sider how the state repays cit- ies, counties and special dis- tricts that waive their property taxes to attract new jobs. The state ■ Study focuses on city’s young creatives — economic saviors or slackers has not made “We’re not any such pay- he key thing to understand about Ev- But Jones isn’t lazy in his between job pre- ments yet be- an Jones is that he doesn’t lack ambi- tirement phases. He is, in fact, usually very asking for a cause of a pos- tion. It only looks like he does. busy in his home offi ce programming comput- handout. sible legal T A Southeast Portland resident, er-controlled machines that can carve out glitch in the Jones, who moved to Portland 15 years ago, three-dimensional structures. We entered program cre- admits he isn’t ambitious in the traditional “My ambition is to be able to do things I love into a ated by the sense.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read Claiming Prosperity, a Discussion of the Medgar Evers
    CLAIMING PROSPERITY lm/efchb A MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE CAMPAIGN 2 CLAIMING PROSPERTY A MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE CAMPAIGN The purpose of this document is to describe Claiming Prosperity, President Rudy Crew’s vision for Medgar Evers College (MEC) and Central Brooklyn. It provides the reader with a view of the College in its full historic, physical, human, economic, and educational contexts. It spells out an important plan of action. Finally, it identifies which of the initiatives proposed are investment opportunities for interested partners and explains how MEC and CUNY will invest in the plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement from the President......................................................................................................................................3 The Story of Medgar Evers College.............................................................................................................................5 Brooklyn: Soaring Prospects.......................................................................................................................................7 The Pipeline...............................................................................................................................................................10 Portrait of the College................................................................................................................................................16 The Promise...............................................................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in Standardized Tests: a Systemic Problem
    The National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy Errors in Standardized Tests: A Systemic Problem ErrorsErrors in in Standardized Tests: A Systemic Problem About the National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy Standardized Created as an independent monitoring system for assessment in America, the National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy is located in the Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education at Boston College. The National Board provides research-based test information for policy decision making, with special attention to National Board on Educational groups historically underserved by the educational systems of our country. Specifically, the National Board Testing and Public Policy •Monitors testing programs, policies, and products •Evaluates the benefits and costs of testing programs in operation Tests: •Assesses the extent to which professional standards for test development and use are met in practice This National Board publication is supported by grants from The Ford Foundation and The Atlantic Philanthropies Foundation. A Systemic The National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy Lynch School of Education, Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Kathleen Rhoades & George Madaus Telephone: (617)552-4521 Fax: (617)552-8419 Email: [email protected] BOSTON COLLEGE NBETPP Boston College Problem Visit our website at www.bc.edu/nbetpp for more articles, the latest educational news, and information on NBETPP. Kathleen Rhoades & George Madaus Lynch School of Education Boston College May 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the Ford Foundation for their encouragement and generous support of this project. We would also like to thank Walt Haney and Monty Neil for contributing reports on testing errors and related material.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Colin Baenziger & Associates
    MEMORANDUM COLIN BAENZIGER & ASSOCIATES TO: Mayor and City Council Vero Beach, FL FROM: Colin Baenziger DATE: April 22, 2019 RE: City Attorney Search Update: Recommended Candidates The following is a summary of the six candidates that we are recommending the City consider to be its next City Attorney. We believe all the candidates are very strong and that any one of them would do an excellent job for Vero Beach. Brief summaries of the recommended credentials follow. We have also provided materials for one other candidate you may wish to consider. Although beyond the scope of our assignment, we have additionally provided some information concerning the law firm that submitted a proposal. Those We Are Recommending • Cynthia A. Everett: Ms. Everett was most recently the City Attorney for the City of Fort Lauderdale, FL (population 180,072), for five years. Prior to that she was the Village Attorney for the Village of Pinecrest, FL (population 19,201), for fourteen years. She has a collegial, flexible management style believing no one style fits every situation. Employees have different backgrounds and experiences, and those factors must be considered in managing people. Throughout her legal career she has had many notable accomplishments. Among other things, has had the honor of successfully arguing before the Florida Supreme Court and being elected to The Florida Bar Board of Governors. She feels her greatest achievement to date is being a role model and inspiration to others. Throughout her legal career, students, lawyers, non-lawyers and staff have told her how they admire her leadership, professionalism and career guidance to them over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading, Writing, and Privatization: the Narrative That Helped Change the Nation’S Public Schools
    READING, WRITING, AND PRIVATIZATION: THE NARRATIVE THAT HELPED CHANGE THE NATION’S PUBLIC SCHOOLS by Merrie Elyn Meyers, APR, Fellow PRSA A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May 2013 © Copyright Merrie Elyn Meyers 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Following the death of my husband, I spent some time pondering the question, “What now?” I found the answer in this doctoral program. Despite many personal and professional hurdles, the goal of completing the program kept me on an even keel. It was the light at the end of the tunnel. Thanks, FAU College of Arts and Letters. I am truly grateful to so many people, but I want to offer a special thank you to Kimberly Ann Crockett. Kim is a fabulous proofreader, writing coach, and Socratic style editor. She has been my sounding board from the application to the dissertation. As an editor, she helped me by gently asking, “What the heck are you talking about?” without getting my hackles up. Also, I would like to thank my counselor and guidepost, Dr. Hilda Besner. She encouraged me to apply to the Comparative Studies doctoral program and move forward toward graduation. She never stopped cheering me on, even on my crankiest days. I would be remiss if I did not thank my committee chair, Dr. Ann Branaman for her constant encouragement, even on my days of total self doubt. Ann always has many balls in the air, but she never said no to my request for her time.
    [Show full text]
  • Superintendents
    2007 Finalist Superintendents Rudolph F. “Rudy” Crew, Miami-Dade County Public Schools Dr. Rudy Crew, a lifelong educator, became superintendent of Miami-Dade County Public Schools in July 2004. Crew began his career as a teacher and then served as principal of several public schools in California. Crew moved into numerous district executive positions, including assistant superintendent for instruction and personnel for the Duarte Unified School District in California, deputy superintendent for curriculum and instruction for the Boston Public Schools and deputy superintendent and chief operational officer for the Sacramento City Unified School District. In 1989, Crew became superintendent of the Sacramento City Unified School District. Then, in 1993, he was named superintendent of the Tacoma Public Schools in Washington. From 1995 to 1999, he served as chancellor of the nation’s largest school district, then called the New York City Board of Education. Before being tapped to lead Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Crew served as executive director of the Institute for K-12 Leadership at the University of Washington and as director of school district reform initiatives at the Stupski Foundation. Crew has received many awards, including The Executive Educator’s “Top 100 Educators in North America” in 1993, the NAACP’s “Educational Leadership Award,” the Association of California School Administrators “Administrator of the Year Award” in 1990 and the California State University’s “Teacher of the Year Award” in 1982. Crew earned his bachelor’s degree in management from Babson College in Wellesley, Mass. and his master’s degree in urban education and doctorate in educational administration from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Minutes 1998
    Board of Trustees Minutes of Proceedings, January 7,1998 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK HELD ! JANUARY 7,1998 AT THE BOARD HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 535 EAST BOTH STREET - BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN i The Chairperson called the meeting to order at 450 P.M. There were present: I Anne A. Paolucci, chairwoman Herman Badillo, Vice Chairperson Satish K. Babbar Ronald J. Marino John J. Calandra John Morning Kenneth E. Cook Susan Moore Mouner Michael C. Crimmins James P. Murphy Alfred B. Curtis Nilda Soto Ruiz Edith B. Everett Richard B. Stone Sandi E. Cooper, ex officio Md. Mizanoor Biswas, ex officio Secretary Genevieve Mullin Roy Moskowitz, Acting General Counsel and Acting Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs t Hourig Messerlian, Executive Assistant Anthony Vargas Interim Chancellor Christoph M. Kimmich Vice Chancellor Brenda Malone Vice Chancellor Jay Hershenson Vice Chancellor Louise Mirrer Vice Chancellor Emma E. Macari Vice Chancellor Richard F. Rothbard The absence of Trustee George Rios was excused. A. ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW STANDING COMMITTEE: Chairwoman Paolucci announced that after reviewing the situation that was called to her attention several months ago in fact, and after talking with several people including Vice Chancellor Emma Macari, she has decided to set up a new committee that will focus on Facilities Planning and Management because there is never, it seems, enough time in the Fiscal Affairs Committee for items dealing with facilities. B. UPDATE ON THE CHANCELLOR'S AND NEW YORK CITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE PRESIDENTIAL SEARCHES: Chairwoman Paolucci reported that today was the deadline for proposals to be submitted for the executive search firms who will be helping us with the searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Making It Count: a Guide to High-Impact Education Philanthropy. INSTITUTION Thomas B
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 464 397 EA 031 633 AUTHOR Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Amis, Kelly TITLE Making It Count: A Guide to High-Impact Education Philanthropy. INSTITUTION Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2001-09-00 NOTE 118p. AVAILABLE FROM Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 1627 K Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20006. Tel: 888-823-7474 (Toll Free); e-mail: [email protected]. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Secondary Education; Philanthropic Foundations; *Private Financial Support ABSTRACT The level of philanthropic giving to K-12 education in the U.S. is at an all-time high, yet there are instances in which large amounts of money bestowed seem to have vanished into the system without leaving lasting footprints or a meaningful transformation. The aim of this guide is to provide practical advice for philanthropists who are tired of the status quo and want to have their donations make a difference for all children. The guide begins with an overview of American education today. Chapter one can be considered as a primer on what is and is not working by way of policy-driven reform and why private intervention isneeded. In chapter two, theories of change embraced by education reformers are discussed, and explanations are given on why some theories work better than others. Chapter three details issues that every reform-minded philanthropist should ask him or herself before writing a check. Some philanthropists are profiled in chapter four to demonstrate how theories of change work in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Oswego Man Sept
    Answer me this Homegrown mermaid Not-too-serious questions for Collette Remsen may be coming to our local candidates a pool near you — See LO, Inside — See NEIGHBORS, B1 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2012 • ONLINE AT LAKEOSWEGOREVIEW.COM • VOLUME 99, NO. 43 • 75 CENTS Attorneys Pacers celebrate homecoming Meiser no debate state role longer a white in lake supremacist, access case attorney says Procedural issue Suspect faces six counts holds up federal of aggravated murder in lawsuit LO home-invasion case By KARA HANSEN MURPHEY The Review By KARA HANSEN MURPHEY The Review Attorneys defending the city against a federal lawsuit Erik John Meiser, accused in the brutal that could open up public ac- murder of a retired Lake Oswego man Sept. cess to Oswego Lake urged a 17, no longer fancies himself a white su- judge to dismiss the case in premacist or neo-Nazi, his attorneys said court this week. Friday, when he was ar- REVIEW PHOTO: VERN UYETAKE About 15 people attended the raigned in Clackamas County Lakeridge High School celebrated homecoming last week and Pacer spirit was sky high. The marching band put in extra hearing before U.S. District Circuit Court. practices to prepare for the parade and the halftime entertainment. Pictured marching down A Avenue are, from left, Danny Judge Ancer L. Haggerty in a Meiser, 37, who appeared on a Shapiro, Nick Abbot in front, Caleb Warden and Greg Conan. For more pictures of the Pacer homecoming activities turn to downtown Portland courtroom. live video feed from Clackamas The hearing was the latest page A17 in today’s Education section.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester E. Finn, Jr. Kelly Amis MAKING IT C OUNT
    Chester E. Finn, Jr. Kelly Amis MAKING IT C OUNT: A GUIDE TO HIGH-IMPACT EDUCATION PHILANTHROPY CHESTER E. FINN,JR. KELLY AMIS The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation September 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . .5 CHAPTER ONE . .9 WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT EDUCATION REFORM CHAPTER TWO . .19 SEEKING SOLUTIONS THROUGH PHILANTHROPY CHAPTER THREE . .35 ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS 3 CHAPTER FOUR . .43 EDUCATION PHILANTHROPISTS IN ACTION CHAPTER FIVE . .101 ON THE GROUND IN DAYTON: THE FORDHAM EXPERIENCE CHAPTER SIX . .111 GETTING STARTED INTRODUCTION WHY, DESPITE ALL the effort and money directed at reforming and renew- ing American public education, does it continue to fail so many students? Is this a hopeless case or can the system still be changed to serve all American children far better? What would a transformed, effective system look like? And what, if anything, can reform-minded philanthropists do to help make that vision a reality? We believe that every young American deserves a top-notch education characterized by high academic standards, great teachers, and a strong commitment to developing the values, character, and skills necessary to thrive in the 21st century.A system characterized by equity and excel- 5 lence: that’s our dream and our mission, and we believe that nearly every philanthropist who gets involved in education reform shares it. We also believe it is possible. In these pages, we share with you some ideas for high- impact giving, whether your focus is local or national, whether your time and resources are modest or vast. Why are we doing this? Because our own commitment to education reform is strong, because we seek more allies in this quest, because it’s too urgent a national need for any willing contributor to waste time or squander money, and because, alas, many an earnest philanthropist has already tried to better our schools, only to be dismayed by the lack of lasting, tangible results.
    [Show full text]
  • FOUNDATIONS for SUCCESS Case Studies of How Urban School Systems Council of the Great City Schools 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 702, Washington, D.C
    47544_CGCS_cvr 8/22/02 8:57 AM Page 1 FOUNDATIONS FOR SUCCESS Case Studies of How Urban School Systems Council of the Great City Schools 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 702, Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: 202-393-2427 • Fax: 202-393-2400 Improve Student Achievement www.cgcs.org MDRC for the Council of the Great CIty Schools FOUNDATIONS FOR SUCCESS FOUNDATIONS FOUNDATIONS FOR SUCCESS CASE STUDIES OF HOW URBAN SCHOOL SYSTEMS IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SEPTEMBER 2002 AUTHORS JASON SNIPES FRED DOOLITTLE CORINNE HERLIHY RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY MDRC FOR THE COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY SCHOOLS 47544_CG_001_022_R2.p65 1 8/27/02, 3:43 AM FINANCIAL SUPPORT PROVIDED BY OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & IMPROVEMENT, US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE FORD FOUNDATION COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY SCHOOLS The findings and conclusions presented in this report do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the Office of Educational Research & Improvement, US Depart- ment of Education (grant no R215U000020) or the Ford Foundation 47544_CG_001_022_R2.p65 2 8/27/02, 3:43 AM PREFACE This study, Foundations for Success, began almost four years ago as the Council of the Great City Schools began thinking about whether all the reforms that urban schools were pursuing actually improved their performance A great deal of effort, expertise, and resources were being devoted to boosting urban school achievement, but almost no one was asking the question about whether the reforms were working The primary question, of course, involved whether or not urban
    [Show full text]