DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Ori Inal Document. SCHOOL- CHOICE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 460 188 UD 034 633 AUTHOR Moffit, Robert E., Ed.; Garrett, Jennifer J., Ed.; Smith, Janice A., Ed. TITLE School Choice 2001: What's Happening in the States. INSTITUTION Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-0-89195-100-8 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 275p.; For the 2000 report, see ED 440 193. Foreword by Howard Fuller. AVAILABLE FROM Heritage Foundation, 214 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Washington, DC 20002-4999 ($12.95). Tel: 800-544-4843 (Toll Free). For full text: http://www.heritage.org/schools/. PUB TYPE Books (010) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; Charter Schools; Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Private Schools; Public Schools; Scholarship Funds; *School Choice ABSTRACT This publication tracks U.S. school choice efforts, examining research on their results. It includes: current publicschool data on expenditures, schools, and teachers for 2000-01 from a report by the National Education Association; a link to the states'own report cards on how their schools are performing; current private school informationfrom a 2001 report by the National Center for Education Statistics; state rankingson the new Education Freedom Index by the Manhattan Institute in 2000; current National Assessment of Educational Progress test results releasedin 2001; and updates on legislative activity through mid-July 2001. Afterdiscussing ways to increase opportunities for children to succeed, researchon school choice, and public opinion, a set of maps and tables offera snapshot of choice in the states. The bulk of the book containsa state-by-state analysis that examines school choice status; K-12 public schools andstudents; K-12 public school teachers; K-12 public and private school studentacademic performance; background and developments; position of the governor/composition of the state legislature; and statecontacts. An appendix presents national organizations that promote school choice. (Contains approximately 690 endnotes.) (SM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the ori inal document. SCHOOL- CHOICE 00 00 71- r-4 0 WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE STATES U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement Edited by Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D., EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) lifiThis document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization Jennifer J. Garrett and Janice A. Smith originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to Foreword by Howard Fuller Improve reproduction quality Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY BEST COPYAVAILABLE 114.-Aeri-lk3e.:SundaVtori TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES el . INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) GliefitageTowidatiort 4 1 School Choice 2001 What's Happening in the States 0 School Choice 2001 What's Happening in the States Edited by Robert E. Moffitt Ph.D., Jennifer J. Garrett, and Janice A. Smith ge clieritageGFoundatim Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D. is Director of Domestic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation. Jennifer J. Garrett is a Research Assistant at The Heritage Foundation. Janice A. Smith is Research Department Managing Editor at The Heritage Foundation. Published by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002-4999 800-544-4843 www.heritage.org Copyright © 2001 The Heritage Foundation ISBN 0-89195-100-8 Front cover design by Mark Hurlburt Photo copyright © 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. Table of Contents a- Acknowledgments iv Maryland 97 Foreword Massachusetts 103 Introduction vii Michigan 111 Increasing Opportunities for ix Minnesota 119 0 America's Children to Succeed Mississippi 125 r+ Missouri 127 Snapshots of Choice in the States Montana 133 Map A: School Choice and Charter School Programs: 2001 xxiv Nebraska 135 Table 1: School Choice and Nevada 137 Charter School Programs xxv New Hampshire 141 Map B: Private Scholarship Programs. .. xxvi New Jersey 145 Table 2: Private Scholarship New Mexico 151 Organizations and Programs xxvi New York 157 Table 3: Governor Support of North Carolina 169 State Vouchers and Composition of North Dakota 175 State Legislatures xxix Ohio 177 Table 4: Private Elementary and Secondary Schools, 1999-2000 xxx Oklahoma 185 Oregon 189 State by State Analysis Pennsylvania 193 About the State Profiles xxxiii Rhode Island 201 Alabama 1 South Carolina 203 Alaska 3 South Dakota 207 Arizona 5 Tennessee 209 Arkansas 11 Texas 213 California 15 Utah 221 Colorado 25 Vermont 225 Connecticut 31 Virginia 229 Delaware 35 Washington 235 District of Columbia 39 West Virginia 241 Florida 45 Wisconsin 243 Georgia 53 Wyoming 251 Hawaii 59 Mariana Islands 255 Idaho 63 Puerto Rico 257 Illinois 67 Indiana 73 Glossary Iowa 77 A School Choice Glossary 259 Kansas 81 Appendix Kentucky 85 National Organizations that 261 Louisiana 89 Promote School Choice Maine 93 III For updates go to: www.heritage.org/schools Acknowledgments School Choice 2001: What's Happening in the States owes much to the painstaking work of school choice advocates around the country who invest their time, talent, and resources to improve and expand edu- cational opportunities for America's children. Many of these individuals keep our analysts and research assistants abreast of school choice initiatives and activities in their states. Too many to name, we owe all of our "state contacts" our deepest thanks. But we would be remiss not to give special recognition to those who worked most closely with us on this edition: Judy Alger and State Representative John Alger of New Hampshire, Lewis Andrews of Connecticut, Brian Backstrom of New York, George Clowes of Illinois, Zack Dawes of Texas, Dr. Anne Fox-Clarkson of Idaho, Joni Gardner of Maryland, Mary Gifford of Michigan, Patrick Heffernan of Florida, Frank Heller of Maine, Jeff Judson of Texas, Lisa Keegan of Arizona, Rob Kremer of Oregon, John McClaughry of Vermont, Susan Mitchell of Wisconsin, Rob Natelson of Montana, Senator Kay O'Connor of Kansas, Representative Fern Shuberg of North Carolina, Jim Spady of Washington State, Libby Sternberg of Vermont, Lil Tuttle of Virginia, Nancy Verber of Georgia, and Linda Williams of North Carolina. This annual analysis also relies heavily on the exceptional work of organizations like the Center for Edu- cation Reform, the Friedman Foundation, the Education Commission of the States, and Children First America that dedicate their resources to promote school choice. They analyze legislation and key devel- opments, monitor meetings, distribute fax and e-mail alerts, work with policymakers to craft good laws, and compile excellent state-by-state evaluations and rankings. Over the years, their work has proved to be solid, credible, timely, and extremely important to the public debate about school choice. We greatly value their efforts and sincerely appreciate their direct and indirect contributions to this ongoing proj ect. No product of this magnitude could be accomplished without the efforts of many committed people at The Heritage Foundation. We thank especially Nina Shokraii Rees, former Senior Education Policy Ana- lyst, whose work on previous editions forms the core of this one; Thomas Dawson, Fellow in Educa- tional Affairs, who generously gave his time to assuring that we had the latest and best information on the people and their efforts at the grassroots level; Rea Hederman, Manager of Operations for the Center for Data Analysis, and Kirk A. Johnson, Ph.D., Policy Analyst in the Center for Data Analysis for their assistance on standardized testing; and the former and current domestic policy interns who unfailingly and cheerfully assisted the staff in many ways to update the information herein, Marie Fishpaw, Robert Talerico, and Kathleen Sullivan. We most especially thank the dedicated members of our in-house publishing staff who gave this prod- uct its final polish. Special thanks to Richard Odermatt, Senior Editor, and Michelle Fulton Smith, Senior Design and Layout Specialist, whose many hours of expert attention greatly enhanced its quality; to Anne Gartland, former Design and Layout Specialist, for her unfailingly conscientious assistance; to Harris Byers, Graphic Design Specialist, and Chris Flemming, former Graphic Design Specialist, for their work on the charts and tables; to Mark Hurlburt for the cover design; to Erica Youngman, Publish- ing Services Intern, for helping us to keep to the schedule; to John Dickson, Web Producer, and the other Web producers in the Online Communications department for their work on the Internet-ready version; and to Thomas J. Timmons, Director of Publishing Services, and William Beach, Director of the Center for Data Analysis, for shepherding this project through production. The Editors iv 7 Foreword -n Howard Fuller As we say in the Black Alliance for Educational function with dignity, to exercise influence over a Options (BAEO), children are our most pre- our lives, and in the end to determine for our- cious resource. It is our responsibility to love selves the course of our reality. them, nurture them, and protect them. It is also Access, in a word, means accessible. For our our responsibility to ensure that they are prop- purposes, we must ask whether parental choice erly educated. The mission of BAEO is to enhances accessibility for the children with the actively support parental choice to empower greatest needs. I believe it does. low-income parents to choose the learning envi- ronments that they believe are best for their The issues of equity and access as they relate to children. parental choice must be seen within the frame- work of four critical concepts of the "American School choice, however, is often misunderstood ideal": by well-meaning people or distorted by those who oppose it. The term is often used to mean The mission of education, only vouchers.
Recommended publications
  • A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott

    A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott

    David Richard Hexter Thesis Title: A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1 Statement of Originality I, David Richard Hexter, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged and my contribution indicated. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the college has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. David R Hexter 12/01/2016 2 Abstract Author: David Hexter, PhD candidate Title of thesis: A Critical Assessment of the Political Doctrines of Michael Oakeshott Description The thesis consists of an Introduction, four Chapters and a Conclusion. In the Introduction some of the interpretations that have been offered of Oakeshott’s political writings are discussed. The key issue of interpretation is whether Oakeshott is best considered as a disinterested philosopher, as he claimed, or as promoting an ideology or doctrine, albeit elliptically.
  • The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn Vs Rauner John S

    The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn Vs Rauner John S

    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC The imonS Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Simon Public Policy Institute) 1-2015 The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner John S. Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers Paper #40 of the Simon Review Recommended Citation Jackson, John S., "The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner" (2015). The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute). Paper 40. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute) by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Simon Review The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs. Rauner By: John S. Jackson Paper #40 January 2015 A Publication of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Southern Illinois University Carbondale Author’s Note: I want to thank Cary Day, Jacob Trammel and Roy E. Miller for their valuable assistance on this project. THE SIMON REVIEW The Simon Review papers are occasional nonacademic papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale that examine and explore public policy issues within the scope of the Institute’s mission and in the tradition of the University. The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute acts on significant and controversial issues impacting the region, the state, the nation, and the world.
  • Libertarian Women Anti-Inflation Institute Fighting Newspeak

    Libertarian Women Anti-Inflation Institute Fighting Newspeak

    political battle would be won. Katz’s Committee to Eetabllsh the Gold Standard, 85 Fourth Ave., New York, NY 10003, and Jim Blanchard’s National Committee for Monetary Re- form, in New Orleans, are planning to West, New York, NY 10003 for more sponsor a nationwide advertising cam- Libertarian Women information. paign to highlight this difference in per- ceptions. Anyone interested in this cam- The Association of Libertarian Femiu- paign, which includes professionally ish was well represented at the Inter- Anti-Inflation prepared ad copy, cartoons, etc. should national Women’s Year Convention in contact Jim Blanchard at 1524 Hillary Houston, TX, Nov. 16-20. Tonie Nathan Institute Street, New Orleans, LA 70118. The was appointed as a national delegate-at- Committees are presently raising money large at the last minute, largely through The Institute on Money and Iaflation, to insert the ads in major national media. the lobbying efforts of Libertarian Party Suite B-1, 314 East Capitol Street, Inflation continues to top the chart of National Director, Chris Hocker in Washington, DC 20002, has recently issues which worry the general public the Washington. Nicole Bergland and Linda been formed “to make sound money a most, exceeding the unemployment issue Rader of California and Sue Bjornseth of respectable topic of discussion on Capitol by a substantial margin. Houston organized the libertarian effort Hill.” As a tax-exempt policy study Howard Katz has long advocated a at the convention. group, the I.M.I. plans to bridge the in- grass-roots, blue-collar approach to the The libertarians shared a display tellectual chasm between the significant gold standard struggle.
  • MAY 2 6 `Lg09 CLERK of COURT SUPREMECOURTOFOWIO TABLE of CONTENTS

    MAY 2 6 `Lg09 CLERK of COURT SUPREMECOURTOFOWIO TABLE of CONTENTS

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OHIO GROCERS ASSOCIATION, et al., . Case No. 2008-2018 Plaintiffs-Appellees, Appeal from the Franklin County Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate V. District RICHARD A. LEVIN, Ohio Tax . Court of Appeals Case Commioner . No.07AP-813 Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY SOLUTIONS AND THE TAX FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS- APPELLEES OHIO GROCERS ASSOCIATION, et al. Maurice A. Thompson (0078548) Charles Saxbe 1851 Center for Constitutional Law Donald C. Brey Buckeye histitute for Public Policy Solutions Gerhardt A. GosneO H 88 E. Broad, Suite 1120 Chester, Wilcox & Saxbe LLP Columbus, Ohio 43215 65 E. State Street Tel: (614) 224-4422 Suite 1000 Fax: (614) 224 4644 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Email: [email protected] (614) 221-4000 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Joseph D. Henchman Member of the Maryland Bar Richard Cordray District of Columbia Bar No. 985625 Attorney General of Ohio Tax Counsel, Tax Foundation Benjamin C. Mizer 2001 L Street, N.W., Suite 1050 Solicitor General Washington, DC 20036 Stephen Carney Tel: (202) 464-6200 Elizabeth Long Fax: (202) 464-6201 Deputy Solicitors Lawrence D. Pratt Attorneys for Amici Curiae Julie Brigner In support of Plaintiffs-Appellants Assistant Attorneys General 30 East Broad Street, 17`h Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 I IJ ^ ^ ^ (^3 1 (614) 466-8980 Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant MAY 2 6 `lG09 CLERK OF COURT SUPREMECOURTOFOWIO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ........................................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS ..........................................................................................................3 ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ..........................................3 Proposition of Law No.
  • 1 in the Court of Common Pleas Lucascounty, Ohio

    1 in the Court of Common Pleas Lucascounty, Ohio

    IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LUCASCOUNTY, OHIO JOEL CURCIO ) 1968 S. Holland Rd. ) Maumee, Ohio 43537 ) CASE NO ) and ) ) SUMMER CURCIO ) 1968 S. Holland Rd. ) Maumee, Ohio 43537 ) ) and ) ) CHRIS ACKERMAN ) 5915 Shawnee Ave. ) Walbridge, Ohio 43465 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE: ) vs. ) ) KATHLEEN HUFFORD, in her official ) capacity as Finance Director ) of the City of Oregon, Ohio ) 5330 Seaman Rd. ) COMPLAINT FOR Oregon, Ohio 43616 ) DECLARATORY AND ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF and ) ) JOHN ZAWISTA, in his official ) capacity as Tax Commissioner of ) the City of Toledo, Ohio ) One Government Center ) 640 Jackson St. ) Toledo, Ohio 43604 ) ) and ) ) DAVE YOST, in his official capacity as ) Ohio Attorney General ) 30 East Broad St. ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) Defendants. ) 1 Plaintiffs Joel Curcio, Summer Curcio, and Chris Ackerman, by and through counsel, for their Complaint hereby states as follows: NATURE OF THE SUIT 1. The novel coronavirus and the State of Ohio’s efforts to limit its spread forced Ohioans to make significant changes to how they live and work. Though these changes were sudden and unexpected, by and large Ohioans responded by finding ways to continue to live and work safely. 2. Perhaps the most ubiquitous adaptation across Ohio workplaces was the shift to working from home. Indeed, in many cases, the health orders issued by the State of Ohio made working from home the only option for some workplaces. In many cases, those workplaces discovered that—subject to some minor inconveniences—employees could still successfully perform their jobs remotely, without physically setting foot in their offices. 3. It is well-established, however, that where an employee performs his or her work has tax consequences.
  • Specimen Ballot Mason County, Illinois General

    Specimen Ballot Mason County, Illinois General

    SPECIMEN BALLOT FEDERAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE REGION MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR FOR REGIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS GENERAL ELECTION (Vote for one) (MASON, TAZEWELL AND WOODFORD COUNTIES) NOVEMBER 4, 2014 RICHARD J. DURBIN DEMOCRATIC (Vote for one) REPUBLICAN No Candidate DEMOCRATIC I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIMEN BALLOT IS A TRUE AND JAMES D. "JIM" OBERWEIS CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICES AND CANDIDATES TO BE VOTED IN SHARON HANSEN LIBERTARIAN GAIL S. OWEN REPUBLICAN THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN MASON COUNTY ON Write-in COUNTY BOARD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2014. STATE FOR MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY BOARD FOR GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DISTRICT ONE (Vote for one) (Vote for not more than two) ELDON H. GARLISCH DEMOCRATIC SUMMER R. BROWN, COUNTY CLERK (PAT QUINN MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS (PAUL VALLAS DEMOCRATIC ROBERT D. HARRIS DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS (BRUCE RAUNER REBECCA SWITZER REPUBLICAN "NOTICE (EVELYN SANGUINETTI REPUBLICAN FOR MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY BOARD THE FAILURE TO VOTE THIS BALLOT MAY BE THE (CHAD GRIMM DISTRICT TWO EQUIVALENT OF A NEGATIVE VOTE, BECAUSE A (ALEXANDER CUMMINGS LIBERTARIAN (Vote for not more than two) CONVENTION SHALL BE CALLED OR THE AMENDMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE IF APPROVED BY EITHER ( Write-In __________________________________________________________ KENNETH WALKER DEMOCRATIC THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE VOTING ON THE QUESTION OR ( RICHARD SHOEMAKER DEMOCRATIC A MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING IN THE ELECTION. (THIS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A DIRECTION THAT YOUR FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL TONY GATHMAN REPUBLICAN VOTE IS REQUIRED TO BE CAST EITHER IN FAVOR OF OR (Vote for one) HUGH McHARRY REPUBLICAN IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSITION HEREIN LISA MADIGAN DEMOCRATIC CONTAINED.) BOARD OF REVIEW PAUL M.
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document

    Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 438 604 EA 030 238 TITLE Children First: A Discussion Paper on Public School Finance and Education Reform in Ohio. Building Community through Choice. INSTITUTION Buckeye Inst. for Public Policy Solutions, Dayton, OH. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 28p. AVAILABLE FROM Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Studies, 4100 N. High St., Suite 200, Columbus, OH 45402 ($5). Tel: 614-262-1593; Fax: 614-292-1927; e-mail: [email protected]. For full text: http://www.buckeyinstitute.org. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Educational Change; *Educational Equity (Finance); *Educational Finance; Elementary Secondary Education; *Finance Reform; School District Spending; Student Costs IDENTIFIERS *Child Centered Education; *Ohio ABSTRACT This document outlines a framework for a child-centered education approach to meet the requirements of the school-funding reforms mandated by the Ohio Supreme Court. The restructuring, which tied funding to education opportunity, was in response to the court case, "DeRolph vs. State," which ended reliance on the local property tax as the primary funding source for public schools, gave the state the primary responsibility for funding education, improved funding for facilities, and linked the costs of a child's education to school funding. The paper details how Child-Centered Education uses market-oriented reforms to transform public education, institutionalize accountability, improve productivity, and meet the mandate of "DeRolph." The mechanism provides incentives for stakeholders within the system to reform their own schools through competition for students. The report outlines how child-centered education works, and details some of the parameters connected with parental and local control of education.
  • ED438603.Pdf

    ED438603.Pdf

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 438 603 EA 030 237 AUTHOR Kozar, Ronald; Damask, James TITLE Giving Choice a Chance: Cleveland and the Future of School Reform. INSTITUTION Buckeye Inst. for Public Policy Solutions, Dayton, OH. PUB DATE 1998-09-00 NOTE 50p. AVAILABLE FROM Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, 4100 N. High St., Suite 200, Columbus, OH 45402 ($5). Tel: 614-262-1593; Fax: 614-262-1927; e-mail: buckeyeinstitute.org. For full text: http://www.buckeyeinstitute.org. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Change Strategies; Educational Change; Educational Policy; *Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; *School Choice; *Strategic Planning IDENTIFIERS *Cleveland Public Schools OH; *Ohio (Cleveland) ABSTRACT This report outlines the history and implementation of a voucher program in Cleveland, Ohio. It describes the difficulty educational reformers encounter when trying to place any public initiative on the ballot, and the importance of using the legislative process to implement a voucher system. The text describes the opposition to vouchers and how the support of the governor was essential in pushing voucher legislation through the legislature. Some of the key components of that success were: bipartisan support; a grassroots-support campaign organized by parents; the inclusion of vouchers as part of the overall budget rather than as a stand-alone bill; and the compromise in implementing the voucher system in one city rather than in the whole state. One of the unique features of the Cleveland voucher program was its inclusion of religious schools. It allocated $2,250 per student, and students below 200 percent of the poverty line qualified for the full 90 percent subsidy.
  • Alabama Commission on Improving State Government

    Alabama Commission on Improving State Government

    Office of the Governor - Robert Bentley Alabama Commission on Improving State Government Phase One Report 2011 Page | 1 Table of Contents Alabama Commission on Improving State Government Phase One Report Section Name Page Letter from the Chairman 2 Executive Order 4 3 - 4 Press Releases 5 - 10 Alabama Commission on Improving State Government Members 11 - 18 Executive Overview 19 - 21 Summary of Meetings and Methodology 22 Phase One: Recommendations for Executive Action and Executive Orders 23 - 46 Phase One: Recommendations Reviewed but Do Not Require Further Study 47 - 52 Phase Two: Recommendations Reviewed but Require Further Study 53 - 63 Conclusion 64 Appendix A: Executive Subcommittee Report 65 - 67 Appendix B: Memorandums and Letters 68 - 77 Appendix C: Consolidation Considerations 78 - 82 Appendix D: Website Submissions by Web Category 83 - 111 Appendix E: Website Submissions by Title 112 - 123 References 124 Page | 2 July 15, 2011 The Honorable Robert Bentley Governor of Alabama State Capitol Montgomery, Alabama Dear Governor Bentley: On behalf of the members appointed to the Commission, we are pleased to present to you this final report of the Alabama Commission on Improving State Government. The Commission was charged with the task of working with the Legislature and the Governor’s Policy Office to analyze and explore new ways to reduce government spending with minimal or no reduction to essential state services. From its inception, the focus of this Commission has been on the immediate implementation of recommendations, rather than merely establishing a set of recommendations to be placed in a report. In December 2008, the National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the U.S.
  • Christianity in America Congressman Gary Palmer, Speaker June 30, 2019 • Evening Sermon

    Christianity in America Congressman Gary Palmer, Speaker June 30, 2019 • Evening Sermon

    Christianity in America Congressman Gary Palmer, speaker June 30, 2019 • Evening Sermon A lot has changed in the last 11 years when I spoke here at Briarwood. George W. Bush was President of the U.S. and Spencer Bachus was your congressman. I didn’t have a beard. I have thought about what else has changed in the last 11 years. We are much more divided as a nation. We have a crisis on our hands that I think we have to think honestly to and be willing to acknowledge. The thing that bothers me most is how quickly we forget who we are. I recently had a meeting on Capitol Hill and it was one of those clear nights. I was walking past the Supreme Court and got in front of the Capitol. It’s rare that there is nobody there but that night there was nobody there. I could see the stars behind the dome and it was one of those times that it hit me where I was. It happened to be a day or two before the anniversary of D-Day and the question popped into my head ‘I wonder who was the first soldier to die that morning those boats hit those beaches and I wonder what he was thinking?’ He may have been 19 or 20 years old and could hear those bullets hitting the ramp as the engines were turning trying to get them as close as they could to the beach. When the ramp came down did his foot ever touch the surf? I am amazed but what is even more amazing is that the guys behind him kept going not knowing how that day might end for them.

  • 0913-PT-A Section.Indd

    Racking up sales YOUR ONLINE LOCAL Netminder Recycling auto racks big biz DAILY NEWS Hawks’ Burke settles in — See SUSTAINABLE LIFE, C1 www.portlandtribune.com — See SPORTS, B10 PortlandPTHURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILYTribune PAPER • WWW.PORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED THURSDAY Counties, cities hit in rebate (P)RETIREMENT’S debate Local leaders balk as lawmaker seeks cuts NEW FRONTIER to job creation fund By JIM REDDEN The Tribune An infl uential Portland-ar- ea legislator thinks local and regional governments are owed too much money from state income taxes collected as part of their econom- ic develop- ment efforts. State Sen. Ginny Burdick, who repre- sents South- west Portland and parts of BURDICK Washington County, wants the 2013 Legislature to recon- sider how the state repays cit- ies, counties and special dis- tricts that waive their property taxes to attract new jobs. The state ■ Study focuses on city’s young creatives — economic saviors or slackers has not made “We’re not any such pay- he key thing to understand about Ev- But Jones isn’t lazy in his between job pre- ments yet be- an Jones is that he doesn’t lack ambi- tirement phases. He is, in fact, usually very asking for a cause of a pos- tion. It only looks like he does. busy in his home offi ce programming comput- handout. sible legal T A Southeast Portland resident, er-controlled machines that can carve out glitch in the Jones, who moved to Portland 15 years ago, three-dimensional structures. We entered program cre- admits he isn’t ambitious in the traditional “My ambition is to be able to do things I love into a ated by the sense.
  • Remarks at James Ward Elementary School in Chicago, Illinois January 9, 2001

    Remarks at James Ward Elementary School in Chicago, Illinois January 9, 2001

    Jan. 9 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 2001 the money that we’re piling up on Social Secu- about balancing the economy and the environ- rity, we can save 54 years on Social Security. ment. So we didn’t solve global warming, but we And if we think about the future with those made a good dent in it. We haven’t solved all sorts of basic values and never forgetting our the economic problems in the inner cities, the mutual need for one another and that America Indian reservations, the rural communities that wins when we treat every single endeavor like have been left behind, but we left America with a team sport, the best days of this country are the tools to do it. still ahead. And what I want to ask all of you to do Thank you, and God bless you. is to think about where we are now and where NOTE: The President spoke at 1:40 p.m. in the we were 8 years ago. And then, imagine in your Jack Breslin Student Events Center. In his re- own mind—do what I did 8 years ago, especially marks, he referred to Peter McPherson, president, the young people—imagine where you would Michigan State University; Ed Foy, assistant di- like America to be 10 years from now; where rector, United Auto Workers Region I-C, who in- would you like Michigan to be 10 years from troduced the President; Michigan Attorney Gen- now? What do you think it would take to get eral Jennifer M.