DOCSLIB.ORG

Modification 3 Report SILVERTON WIND FARM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modification 3 Report SILVERTON WIND FARM Modification 3 Report SILVERTON WIND FARM JULY 2016 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] Sydney Region Canberra ‐ NSW SE & ACT Wagga Wagga ‐ Riverina and Western NSW 18/21 mary st 17/27 yallourn st (po box 62) suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 (t 02 8202 8333) fyshwick act 2609 (t 02 6280 5053) wagga wagga nsw 2650 (t 02 6971 9696) Newcastle ‐ Hunter and North Coast Bega ‐ ACT and South East NSW Bathurst ‐ Central West and Orana 7/11 union st suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) 35 morrisset st (po box 434) newcastle west nsw 2302 (t 02 4929 2301) bega nsw 2550 (t 02 6492 8333) bathurst nsw 2795 (t 02 6331 4541) Document Verification Project Title: Modification 3 Report Silverton wind farm Project Number: 6773 Project File Name: SLVWF Modification Report Final v1 Revision Date Prepared by (name) Reviewed by (name) Approved by (name) Draft V1 8/07/16 Brooke Marshall Brooke Marshall Nick Graham‐Higgs Jane Mills Jane Blomfield Natascha Arens Bianca Heinze Final V1 20/07/16 Brooke Marshall Brooke Marshall Brooke Marshall Jane Mills Jane Blomfield NGH Environmental prints all documents on environmentally sustainable paper including paper made from bagasse (a by‐ product of sugar production) or recycled paper. NGH Environmental Pty Ltd (ACN: 124 444 622. ABN: 31 124 444 622) and NGH Environmental (Heritage) Pty Ltd (ACN: 603 938 549. ABN: 62 603 938 549) are part of the NGH Environmental Group of Companies. www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] Sydney Region Canberra ‐ NSW SE & ACT Wagga Wagga ‐ Riverina and Western NSW 18/21 mary st 17/27 yallourn st (po box 62) suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 (t 02 8202 8333) fyshwick act 2609 (t 02 6280 5053) wagga wagga nsw 2650 (t 02 6971 9696) Newcastle ‐ Hunter and North Coast Bega ‐ ACT and South East NSW Bathurst ‐ Central West and Orana 7/11 union st suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) 35 morrisset st (po box 434) newcastle west nsw 2302 (t 02 4929 2301) bega nsw 2550 (t 02 6492 8333) bathurst nsw 2795 (t 02 6331 4541) Modification 3 Report Silverton wind farm CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Stage 1 Project Approval ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Stage 2 Concept Plan Approval .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.3 Modification 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 THE APPROVED PROJECT .....................................................................................................................2 1.3 PREVIOUS MODIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Modification 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3.2 Modification 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION .............................................................................................................2 1.5 PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT .......................................................................................3 1.5.1 Modification 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5.2 Scope determined by internal consistency review ................................................................................ 3 1.5.3 Matters raised by Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) ..................................................... 4 1.6 SUMMARY OF PROJECT AND IMPACTS (APPROVED PROJECT) ............................................................5 1.6.1 Project description ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6.2 Key issues (Approved Project) ............................................................................................................... 6 1.6.3 Additional issues .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.4 Management strategies for impacts ...................................................................................................... 7 1.7 PROJECT BENEFITS AND JUSTIFICATION (APPROVED AND MODIFIED PROJECT) ................................8 1.7.1 Renewable energy generation ............................................................................................................... 8 1.7.2 Economic and community benefits ....................................................................................................... 9 2 DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION 3 ............................................................................................ 10 2.1 FEWER, LARGER TURBINES ................................................................................................................11 2.1.1 Turbine parameters ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Decrease in number turbines (282 reduced to a maximum of 172, Stage 1) ...................................... 11 2.1.3 Requirement for further assessment .................................................................................................. 13 2.2 SOURCING CONSTRUCTION WATER FROM PIPELINE ........................................................................13 2.2.1 Requirement for further assessment .................................................................................................. 14 2.3 STAGING .............................................................................................................................................14 2.3.1 Requirement for further assessment .................................................................................................. 15 2.4 CONSERVATION STATUS OF SPECIFIC ENTITIES SINCE THE APPROVAL .............................................16 6773 Final v1 i Modification 3 Report Silverton wind farm 2.4.1 Porcupine Grass ‐ Red Mallee ‐ Gum Coolabah Hummock Grassland / Low Sparse Woodland .......... 16 2.4.2 Barrier Range Dragon .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.3 Requirement for further assessment .................................................................................................. 17 3 CHANGES TO THE NATURE AND LEVEL OF IMPACT .................................................................... 19 3.1 VISUAL ................................................................................................................................................19 3.1.1 Potential impact types ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Level of impact for the Approved versus Modified Project ................................................................. 20 3.1.3 Mitigation strategies ............................................................................................................................ 25 3.2 NOISE..................................................................................................................................................27 3.2.1 Background noise monitoring .............................................................................................................. 27 3.2.2 Worst case scenario turbine model ..................................................................................................... 28 3.2.3 Level of impact for the Approved versus Modified Project ................................................................. 29 3.2.4 Mitigation strategies ............................................................................................................................ 30 3.3 BIRD AND BAT COLLISION RISK ..........................................................................................................31 3.3.1 Potential Impact types ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Level of impact for the Approved versus Modified Project ................................................................. 32 3.3.3 Mitigation strategies ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.4 BIODIVERSITY (VEGETATION CLEARING IMPACTS) ............................................................................34 3.4.1 Approved layout .................................................................................................................................. 34 3.4.2 Revised Modification 3 Layout ............................................................................................................ 35
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E-Program DO NOT PRINT!
    e-program DO NOT PRINT! You’ll receive a pocket program at registration, so no need to print this one. This e-program includes all presentation sessions and the associated abstracts, which are hyperlinked to the name of the presenter. Plenary abstracts are included in the pocket program. The plan on a page Tuesday June 20 Wednesday June 21 Thursday June 22 Friday June 23 7:30-8:30 am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: 7:30-8:30am Breakfast: Dining Hall Dining Hall Dining Hall 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: 8:50-10:00am Plenary: Rick Sabrina Fossette-Halot - Renee Catullo - Chapel. Shine - Chapel. Introduced Chapel. Introduced by Nicki Introduced by Scott Keogh by Ben Philips Mitchell 10:00-10:25 am Tea break 10:00-10:15am Tea break 10:00-10:25am Tea break 10:30-11:54am Short 10:20am -12:00pm Mike Bull 10:30-11:42am Short Talks: Talks: Session 1 - Symposium - Chapel Session 8 - Clubhouse: Clubhouse: upstairs and upstairs and downstairs downstairs 11:45 Conference close (upstairs) 12:00-2:00pm Lunch 12:00-1:00pm Conference 12:00-1:00pm Lunch: Dining (Dining Hall) and ASH photo and lunch Hall or Grab and Go, buses AGM (Clubhouse upstairs) depart for airport from midday High ropes course and 1:00-2:00pm Short Talks: climbing wall open. Book at Session 5 - Clubhouse: registration on Tuesday if upstairs and downstairs interested 2:00 -4:00pm 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: 2:00-3:00pm Speed talks: Registration, locate Session 2 Clubhouse Session 6 Clubhouse accommodation, light upstairs upstairs fires, load talks, book activities 3:00-3:25pm
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing the Dingo: the Risk of Dingo Predation to Threatened Vertebrates of Western New South Wales
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Wildlife Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11128 Reintroducing the dingo: the risk of dingo predation to threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales B. L. Allen A,C and P. J. S. Fleming B AThe University of Queensland, School of Animal Studies, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia. BVertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia. CCorresponding author. Present address: Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Sulfide Street, Broken Hill, NSW 2880, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract Context. The reintroduction of dingoes into sheep-grazing areas south-east of the dingo barrier fence has been suggested as a mechanism to suppress fox and feral-cat impacts. Using the Western Division of New South Wales as a case study, Dickman et al. (2009) recently assessed the risk of fox and cat predation to extant threatened species and concluded that reintroducing dingoes into the area would have positive effects for most of the threatened vertebrates there, aiding their recovery through trophic cascade effects. However, they did not formally assess the risk of dingo predation to the same threatened species. Aims. To assess the risk of dingo predation to the extant and locally extinct threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales using methods amenable to comparison with Dickman et al. (2009). Methods. The predation-risk assessment method used in Dickman et al. (2009) for foxes and cats was applied here to dingoes, with minor modification to accommodate the dietary differences of dingoes. This method is based on six independent biological attributes, primarily reflective of potential vulnerability characteristics of the prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Parasitology
    January 2000 Number 1 Comparative Parasitology Formerly the Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington A semiannual journal of research devoted to Helminthology and all branches of Parasitology BROOKS, D. R., AND"£. P. HOBERG. Triage for the Biosphere: Hie Need and Rationale for Taxonomic Inventories and Phylogenetic Studies of Parasites/ MARCOGLIESE, D. J., J. RODRIGUE, M. OUELLET, AND L. CHAMPOUX. Natural Occurrence of Diplostomum sp. (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) in Adult Mudpiippies- and Bullfrog Tadpoles from the St. Lawrence River, Quebec __ COADY, N. R., AND B. B. NICKOL. Assessment of Parenteral P/agior/iync^us cylindraceus •> (Acatithocephala) Infections in Shrews „ . ___. 32 AMIN, O. M., R. A. HECKMANN, V H. NGUYEN, V L. PHAM, AND N. D. PHAM. Revision of the Genus Pallisedtis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) with the Erection of Three New Subgenera, the Description of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) ^vietnamensis subgen. et sp. n., a Key to Species of Pallisentis, and the Description of ,a'New QuadrigyridGenus,Pararaosentis gen. n. , ..... , '. _. ... ,- 40- SMALES, L. R.^ Two New Species of Popovastrongylns Mawson, 1977 (Nematoda: Gloacinidae) from Macropodid Marsupials in Australia ."_ ^.1 . 51 BURSEY, C.,R., AND S. R. GOLDBERG. Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae) and'Other Intestinal Hehninths of the Japanese Clawed Salamander,^ Onychodactylns japonicus (Caudata: Hynobiidae), from Japan „„ „..„. 60 DURETTE-DESSET, M-CL., AND A. SANTOS HI. Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. (Nematoda: Tricho- strongyUna: Heligmosomoidea) from the White-Ankled Mouse, Peromyscuspectaralis Osgood (Rodentia:1 Cricetidae) from Texas, U.S.A. 66 AMIN, O. M., W. S. EIDELMAN, W. DOMKE, J. BAILEY, AND G. PFEIFER. An Unusual ^ Case of Anisakiasis in California, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Assessment of the Ctenophorus Decresii Complex (Reptilia: Agamidae) Reveals a New Species of Dragon Lizard from Western New South Wales
    © The Authors, 2013. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2013 Records of the Australian Museum 65(3): 51–63 (2013). ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.65.2013.1600 Taxonomic Assessment of the Ctenophorus decresii Complex (Reptilia: Agamidae) Reveals a New Species of Dragon Lizard from Western New South Wales Claire A. McLean1, 2*, Adnan Moussalli2, Steve Sass3, 4, and Devi Stuart-Fox1 1 Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia 2 Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, Carlton Gardens VIC 3053, Australia 3 EnviroKey, PO Box 7231, Tathra NSW 2550, Australia 4 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Thurgoona NSW 2640, Australia [email protected] Abstract. We describe a new species of agamid lizard, Ctenophorus mirrityana sp.nov. currently known from two disjunct populations in western New South Wales. The species is a member of the C. decresii species complex, and was formerly recognized as an outlying population of C. decresii due to similarities in dorsal colour pattern and adjacent distributions. Previous work documented deep molecular divergence, across multiple loci, with no genetic admixture between the new species and proximal C. decresii populations. We find that the new species differs in morphology from all other members of the species complex and is characterized by distinct male throat and lateral coloration, a small head size relative to snout-vent length, a large number of labial scales, and a lack of tubercular scales. We also identify two geographically structured lineages (northern and southern) within C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus
    JEZ Mde 2035 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 291:339–353 (2001) A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus JANE MELVILLE,* JAMES A. SCHULTE II, AND ALLAN LARSON Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 ABSTRACT We present phylogenetic analyses of the lizard genus Ctenophorus using 1,639 aligned positions of mitochondrial DNA sequences containing 799 parsimony-informative charac- ters for samples of 22 species of Ctenophorus and 12 additional Australian agamid genera. Se- quences from three protein-coding genes (ND1, ND2, and COI) and eight intervening tRNA genes are examined using both parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses. Species of Ctenophorus form a monophyletic group with Rankinia adelaidensis, which we suggest placing in Ctenophorus. Ecological differentiation among species of Ctenophorus is most evident in the kinds of habitats used for shelter. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the ancestral condition is to use burrows for shelter, and that habits of sheltering in rocks and shrubs/hummock grasses represent separately derived conditions. Ctenophorus appears to have undergone extensive cladogenesis approximately 10–12 million years ago, with all three major ecological modes being established at that time. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291:339–353, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The agamid lizard genus Ctenophorus provides ecological categories based on whether species abundant opportunity for a molecular phylogenetic shelter in rocks, burrows, or vegetation. Eight spe- study of speciation and ecological diversification. cies of Ctenophorus are associated with rocks: C. Agamid lizards show a marked radiation in Aus- caudicinctus, C. decresii, C. fionni, C.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
    State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Iguanian Lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D
    The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D. Daza, Tiago R. Simões, Jean Claude Rage To cite this version: Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D. Daza, Tiago R. Simões, Jean Claude Rage. The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa. Royal Society Open Science, The Royal Society, 2016, 3 (9), pp.160462. 10.1098/rsos.160462. hal-01426066 HAL Id: hal-01426066 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01426066 Submitted on 4 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on January 4, 2017 The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org Sebastián Apesteguía1,JuanD.Daza2, Tiago R. Simões3 and Jean Claude Rage4 Research 1CEBBAD (CONICET), Fundación de Historia Natural ‘Félix de Azara’, Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, 7°p (1405), Buenos Aires, Argentina Cite this article: Apesteguía S, Daza JD, 2Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, 1900 Avenue I Lee Simões TR, Rage JC. 2016 The first iguanian Drain Building Suite 300, Huntsville, TX 77341-2116, USA lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Ecology and Conservation Genomics of North-Eastern Australian Earless Dragons (Agamidae: Tympanocryptis Spp.)
    TAXONOMY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION GENOMICS OF NORTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIAN EARLESS DRAGONS (AGAMIDAE: TYMPANOCRYPTIS SPP.) KIRILEE JANE CHAPLIN Bachelor of Science (Hons) Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JUNE 2018 School of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Taxonomy, Ecology and Conservation Genomics of North-Eastern Australian Earless Dragons (Agamidae: Tympanocryptis spp.) By Kirilee Chaplin © 2018 Supervisors: Jane Melville and Joanna Sumner Title Page: Tympanocryptis darlingensis sp. nov., photo by K. Chaplin ABSTRACT Land clearing and modification of natural habitats is threatening biodiversity globally. In Australia, most native grassland habitats have been heavily modified for agriculture, including cropping and grazing. Grassland specialist species, including earless dragon lizards (Tympanocryptis spp.) in north-eastern Australia, are of conservation concern due to this continued habitat loss and fragmentation. However, the north-eastern Australian group of earless dragons (including the recently described T. condaminensis, T. wilsoni and T. pentalineata) are at significant risk, due to the presence of multiple undescribed cryptic Tympanocryptis lineages within this region. It is imperative that the taxonomy is resolved for these cryptic lineages of conservation concern, so conservation of these species may occur. One of the major challenges for taxonomists in recent times has been the species delimitation of morphologically cryptic taxa. The detection of distinct molecular
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns, Mechanisms and Genetics of Speciation in Reptiles and Amphibians
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Patterns, Mechanisms and Genetics of Speciation in Reptiles and Amphibians Katharina C. Wollenberg Valero 1,* , Jonathon C. Marshall 2, Elizabeth Bastiaans 3, Adalgisa Caccone 4, Arley Camargo 5 , Mariana Morando 6, Matthew L. Niemiller 7, Maciej Pabijan 8 , Michael A. Russello 9, Barry Sinervo 10, Fernanda P. Werneck 11 , 12, 13 14 Jack W. Sites Jr. y, John J. Wiens and Sebastian Steinfartz 1 Department of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK 2 Department of Zoology, Weber State University, 1415 Edvalson Street, Dept. 2505, Ogden, UT 84401, USA 3 Department of Biology, State University of New York, College at Oneonta, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA 4 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 5 Centro Universitario de Rivera, Universidad de la República, Ituzaingó 667, Rivera 40000, Uruguay 6 Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales (IPEEC, CENPAT-CONICET) Bv. Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn U9120ACD, Argentina 7 Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA 8 Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, ul. Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Kraków, Poland 9 Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada 10 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Coastal Biology Building,
    [Show full text]