Clinical Manifestations of Congenital Aniridia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corneal Ectasia
Corneal Ectasia Secretary for Quality of Care Anne L. Coleman, MD, PhD Academy Staff Nicholas P. Emptage, MAE Nancy Collins, RN, MPH Doris Mizuiri Jessica Ravetto Flora C. Lum, MD Medical Editor: Susan Garratt Design: Socorro Soberano Approved by: Board of Trustees September 21, 2013 Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology® All rights reserved AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY and PREFERRED PRACTICE PATTERN are registered trademarks of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This document should be cited as follows: American Academy of Ophthalmology Cornea/External Disease Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines. Corneal Ectasia. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2013. Available at: www.aao.org/ppp. Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines are developed by the Academy’s H. Dunbar Hoskins Jr., MD Center for Quality Eye Care without any external financial support. Authors and reviewers of the guidelines are volunteers and do not receive any financial compensation for their contributions to the documents. The guidelines are externally reviewed by experts and stakeholders before publication. Corneal Ectasia PPP CORNEA/EXTERNAL DISEASE PREFERRED PRACTICE PATTERN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PARTICIPANTS The Cornea/External Disease Preferred Practice Pattern® Panel members wrote the Corneal Ectasia Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines (“PPP”). The PPP Panel members discussed and reviewed successive drafts of the document, meeting in person twice and conducting other review by e-mail discussion, to develop a consensus over the final version of the document. Cornea/External Disease Preferred Practice Pattern Panel 2012–2013 Robert S. Feder, MD, Co-chair Stephen D. McLeod, MD, Co-chair Esen K. -
Infantile Aphakia and Successful Fitting of Pediatric Contact Lenses; a Case Presentation Authors: Virji N, Patel A, Libassi D
Infantile aphakia and successful fitting of pediatric contact lenses; a case presentation Authors: Virji N, Patel A, Libassi D An eleven month old male presents with bilateral aphakia secondary to congenital cataracts. The patient is currently successfully wearing B&L Silsoft Pediatric contact lenses, with good prognosis for vision in both eyes. I. Case History -Patient demographics: African American male, DOB 8/18/2009 -Chief complaint: patient presents with bilateral aphakia secondary to bilateral congenital cataract extraction -Ocular, medical history: S/P CE with anterior vitrectomy OD 09/22/2009, followed by OS 09/29/09. (+) squinting, rubs eyes, light sensitivity -Medications: none -Other salient information: patient has been seen by SUNY Contact Lens clinic since 2 months old, 10/14/2009 II. Pertinent findings -Clinical: Keratometry readings 41.00/41.25 @ 005 OD, 38.50/41.00 @ 046 Axial length, immeasurable Horizontal corneal diameter 8mm OD/OS Fundus exam WNL OU -Others: surgical dates: successful CE OU, September 2009 III. Differential diagnosis -Primary/leading: Idiopathic -Others: Posterior lenticonus, persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous, anterior segment dysgenesis, and posterior pole tumors, trauma, intrauterine infection (rubella), maternal hypoglycemia, trisomy (eg, Down, Edward, and Patau syndromes), myotonic dystrophy, infectious diseases (eg, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex [TORCH]), and prematurity. (5) IV. Diagnosis and discussion -Elaborate on the condition: Bilateral infantile cataracts are one of the major treatable causes of visual impairment in children. (2) Hubel and Weisel’s research on the critical period of visual development determined that if infantile cataracts are removed within the critical period and appropriate correction is worn, vision is greatly improved. -
Intraocular Lenses and Spectacle Correction
MEDICAL POLICY POLICY TITLE INTRAOCULAR LENSES, SPECTACLE CORRECTION AND IRIS PROSTHESIS POLICY NUMBER MP-6.058 Original Issue Date (Created): 6/2/2020 Most Recent Review Date (Revised): 6/9/2020 Effective Date: 2/1/2021 POLICY PRODUCT VARIATIONS DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND RATIONALE DEFINITIONS BENEFIT VARIATIONS DISCLAIMER CODING INFORMATION REFERENCES POLICY HISTORY I. POLICY Intraocular Lens Implant (IOL) Initial IOL Implant A standard monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implant is medically necessary when the eye’s natural lens is absent including the following: Following cataract extraction Trauma to the eye which has damaged the lens Congenital cataract Congenital aphakia Lens subluxation/displacement A standard monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implant is medically necessary for anisometropia of 3 diopters or greater, and uncorrectable vision with the use of glasses or contact lenses. Premium intraocular lens implants including but not limited to the following are not medically necessary for any indication, including aphakia, because each is intended to reduce the need for reading glasses. Presbyopia correcting IOL (e.g., Array® Model SA40, ReZoom™, AcrySof® ReStor®, TECNIS® Multifocal IOL, Tecnis Symfony and Tecnis SymfonyToric, TRULIGN, Toric IO, Crystalens Aspheric Optic™) Astigmatism correcting IOL (e.g., AcrySof IQ Toric IOL (Alcon) and Tecnis Toric Aspheric IOL) Phakic IOL (e.g., ARTISAN®, STAAR Visian ICL™) Replacement IOLs MEDICAL POLICY POLICY TITLE INTRAOCULAR LENSES, SPECTACLE CORRECTION AND IRIS PROSTHESIS POLICY NUMBER -
Megalocornea Jeffrey Welder and Thomas a Oetting, MS, MD September 18, 2010
Megalocornea Jeffrey Welder and Thomas A Oetting, MS, MD September 18, 2010 Chief Complaint: Visual disturbance when changing positions. History of Present Illness: A 60-year-old man with a history of simple megalocornea presented to the Iowa City Veterans Administration Healthcare System eye clinic reporting visual disturbance while changing head position for several months. He noticed that his vision worsened with his head bent down. He previously had cataract surgery with an iris-sutured IOL due to the large size of his eye, which did not allow for placement of an anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) or scleral-fixated lens. Past Medical History: Megalocornea Medications: None Family History: No known history of megalocornea Social History: None contributory Ocular Exam: • Visual Acuity (with correction): • OD 20/100 (cause unknown) • OS 20/20 (with upright head position) • IOP: 18mmHg OD, 17mmHg OS • External Exam: normal OU • Pupils: No anisocoria and no relative afferent pupillary defect • Motility: Full OU. • Slit lamp exam: megalocornea (>13 mm in diameter) and with anterior mosaic dystrophy. Iris-sutured posterior chamber IOLs (PCIOLs), stable OD, but pseudophacodonesis OS with loose inferior suture evident. • Dilated funduscopic exam: Normal OU Clinical Course: The patient’s iris-sutured IOL had become loose (tilted and de-centered) in his large anterior chamber, despite several sutures that had been placed in the past, resulting now in visual disturbance with movement. FDA and IRB approval was obtained to place an Artisan iris-clip IOL (Ophtec®). He was taken to the OR where his existing IOL was removed using Duet forceps and scissors. The Artisan IOL was placed using enclavation iris forceps. -
Recessive Buphthalmos in the Rabbit' Rochon-Duvigneaud
RECESSIVE BUPHTHALMOS IN THE RABBIT’ BERTRAM L. HANNA,2 PAUL B. SAWIN3 AND L. BENJAMIN SHEPPARD4 Received September 8, 1961 BUPHTHALMOS (hydrophthalmos, congenital infantile glaucoma) in rabbits has been of interest to European geneticists but has attracted little attention in the United States despite its recurrent appearance in laboratory and commercial breeding stocks. This condition is of particular interest to the field of expen- mental ophthalmology because of its similarity to congenital glaucoma in hu- mans. The earliest report of rabbit buphthalmos appears to be that of SCHLOESSER (1886), who presented the detailed histopathology of the left eye of a brown rab- bit which developed an acute glaucoma following irritation of both corneas to induce traumatic cataract. Other single case reports are by PICHLER(1910), ROCHON-DUVIGNEAUD(1921) and BECKH(1935), although in the last case the buphthalmos may have been secondary to a yaws infection. VOGT(1919), re- ported the occurrence of buphthalmos bilaterally in three siblings purchased at nine months of age. A mating between two of these produced a litter of three, all of which developed high grade buphthalmos. NACHTSHEIM(1937) and GERI (1954, 1955) studied the inheritance of buphthalmos and concluded that it is transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait. FRANCESCHETTI(1930) noted a de- ficiency of affected offspring from matings of heterozygous carrier parents. GERI (1955) found 12.5 percent affected offspring from carrier matings and suggested that the deficiency results from fetal death of buphthalmic animals. MCMASTER (1960) reported a mating of two animals with bilateral buphthalmos which pro- duced a litter of seven, only four of which were affected. -
Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum of PAX6 Mutations: from Congenital Cataracts to Nystagmus
G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum of PAX6 Mutations: From Congenital Cataracts to Nystagmus Maria Nieves-Moreno 1,* , Susana Noval 1 , Jesus Peralta 1, María Palomares-Bralo 2 , Angela del Pozo 3 , Sixto Garcia-Miñaur 4, Fernando Santos-Simarro 4 and Elena Vallespin 5 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (S.N.); [email protected] (J.P.) 2 Department of Molecular Developmental Disorders, Medical and Molecular Genetics Institue (INGEMM) IdiPaz, CIBERER, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Bioinformatics, Medical and Molecular Genetics Institue (INGEMM) IdiPaz, CIBERER, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 4 Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical and Molecular Genetics Institue (INGEMM) IdiPaz, CIBERER, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (S.G.-M.); [email protected] (F.S.-S.) 5 Department of Molecular Ophthalmology, Medical and Molecular Genetics Institue (INGEMM) IdiPaz, CIBERER, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background: Congenital aniridia is a complex ocular disorder, usually associated with severe visual impairment, generally caused by mutations on the PAX6 gene. The clinical phenotype of PAX6 mutations is highly variable, making the genotype–phenotype correlations difficult to establish. Methods: we describe the phenotype of eight patients from seven unrelated families Citation: Nieves-Moreno, M.; Noval, with confirmed mutations in PAX6, and very different clinical manifestations. -
Solved/Unsolved
Supplementary Materials: Supplementary table 1. Demographic details for the 54 individual patients (solved/unsolved) and their clinical features including cataract type, details of ocular co-morbidities, systemic features and whether cataract was the presenting feature (non-isolated cataract patients only). Abbreviations: yes (Y), no (N), not applicable (N/A). Age at Famil Ag M/ Age at Cataract Cataract Cataract Systemic Consanguinit Patient ID Gene Confirmed genetic diagnosis Ethnicity diagnosi Ocular co-morbidities FH y ID e F surgery type RE type LE presenting sign features y s (days) Aniridia, nystagmus, 23 years Posterior Posterior 1-1 1 PAX6 Aniridia White British 25 F - glaucoma, foveal N N N Y 4 months subcapsular subcapsular hypoplasia Cleft palate, epilepsy, high Aphakia Aphakia Macular atrophy, myopia, 7 years 9 7 years 8 arched palate, 2-1 2 COL11A1 Stickler syndrome, type II Not Stated 34 F (post- (post- lens subluxation, vitreous N N N months months flattened surgical) surgical) anomaly maxilla, short stature (5'2ft) Anterior segment dysgenesis, pupillary abnormalities including 12 years Posterior Posterior ectopic pupils, ectropion 3-1 3 CPAMD8 Anterior segment dysgenesis 8 Other, Any other 27 F - N N Y N 5 months subcapsular subcapsular UVAE and irodensis, nystagmus, dysplastic optic discs, large corneal diameters Gyrate atrophy of choroid and 23 years 29 years 1 Posterior Posterior Retinal dystrophy, Bipolar 4-1 4 OAT White British 42 F N N N retina 7 months month subcapsular subcapsular exotropia disorder 1 year 6 1 year -
Feasibility and Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complex Anterior Segment and Vitreous Disease
CLINICAL SCIENCE Feasibility and Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complex Anterior Segment and Vitreous Disease Julia M. Weller, MD, Theofilos Tourtas, MD, and Friedrich E. Kruse, MD escemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is Da technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty, involves becoming the method of choice for treating Fuchs endothelial a graft consisting only of the thin Descemet membrane with dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. We investigated adherent corneal endothelial cells. Introduced in 2006 by whether DMEK can serve as a routine procedure in endothelial Melles et al,1 DMEK is becoming more popular as several decompensation even in complex preoperative situations. studies show its superiority to Descemet stripping automated Methods: Of a total of 1184 DMEK surgeries, 24 consecutive eyes endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), regarding visual function 2,3 with endothelial decompensation and complex preoperative situa- and the time of visual rehabilitation after DMEK. However, tions were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 5 groups: group because DMEK grafts are thinner than DSAEK grafts, it is fi 1: irido-corneo-endothelial syndrome (n = 3), group 2: aphakia, more dif cult to handle them and typically takes surgeons subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens or anterior chamber longer to learn. intraocular lens (n = 6), group 3: DMEK after trabeculectomy (n = In difficult situations, most surgeons prefer DSAEK or 4), group 4: DMEK with simultaneous intravitreal injection (n = 6), penetrating keratoplasty to DMEK because of its possible and group 5: DMEK after vitrectomy (n = 5). Main outcome intraoperative complications. For example, if corneal edema 4 parameters were best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thick- is advanced, Ham et al recommend performing DSAEK first ness, endothelial cell density, rebubbling rate, and graft failure rate. -
Journal of Ophthalmology & Clinical Research
ISSN: 2573-9573 Case Report Journal of Ophthalmology & Clinical Research Bilateral Congenital Ectropion Uveae, Anterior Segment Dysgenesis and Aniridia with Microspherophakic Congenital Cataracts and RubeosisIridis Rao Muhammad Arif Khan* and Ashal Kaiser Pal *Corresponding author Rao Muhammad Arif Khan, MCPS, FCPS, FPO, FACS, Pediatric Ophthalmologist, King Edward Medical University, Al-Awali Street, Taif Road, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, Pediatric Ophthalmologist, King Edward Medical University, Tel: 00966560479694; E-mail: [email protected] Makkah, Saudi Arabia Submitted: 02 Apr 2018; Accepted: 12 Apr 2018; Published: 19 Apr 2018 Abstract In recent times, multiple eye diseases have been seen associated with an increase in the rate of Demodex infestation as a possible cause, but in the particular case of dry eye syndrome in patients treated with platelet-rich plasma, this increase in mite may be relevant to guide a more adequate treatment focusing on the elimination of the mite in conjunction with the recovery of the ocular ecology. The demodex mite is a commensal parasite that lives in hair follicles, sebaceous glands and meibomian, which in a high rate of infestation can generate alterations in the ocular area. Performing an adequate diagnosis for the detection of the mite and treatment for its eradication can be effective for the recovery of the normal physiology of the tear film that constitutes a cause of dry eye. Introduction Congenital ectropion uvea is a rare ocular manifestation of neural crest syndrome [1]. It is a non-progressive anomaly characterized by presence of iris pigment epithelium on anterior surface of iris from the pigment ruff [2]. Congenital glaucoma is its common association [3-8]. -
Congenital Ocular Anomalies in Newborns: a Practical Atlas
www.jpnim.com Open Access eISSN: 2281-0692 Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine 2020;9(2):e090207 doi: 10.7363/090207 Received: 2019 Jul 19; revised: 2019 Jul 23; accepted: 2019 Jul 24; published online: 2020 Sept 04 Mini Atlas Congenital ocular anomalies in newborns: a practical atlas Federico Mecarini1, Vassilios Fanos1,2, Giangiorgio Crisponi1 1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 2Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy Abstract All newborns should be examined for ocular structural abnormalities, an essential part of the newborn assessment. Early detection of congenital ocular disorders is important to begin appropriate medical or surgical therapy and to prevent visual problems and blindness, which could deeply affect a child’s life. The present review aims to describe the main congenital ocular anomalies in newborns and provide images in order to help the physician in current clinical practice. Keywords Congenital ocular anomalies, newborn, anophthalmia, microphthalmia, aniridia, iris coloboma, glaucoma, blepharoptosis, epibulbar dermoids, eyelid haemangioma, hypertelorism, hypotelorism, ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum, dacryocystitis, dacryostenosis, blepharophimosis, chemosis, blue sclera, corneal opacity. Corresponding author Federico Mecarini, MD, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; tel.: (+39) 3298343193; e-mail: [email protected]. -
Ectopia Lentis: Weill Marchesani Syndrome
Review Articles Ectopia Lentis: Weill Marchesani Syndrome HL Trivedi*, Ramesh Venkatesh** Abstract A 20 yr old boy came to our OPD with decreased vision since 3 yrs. He complained of double vision in both the eyes. There were no other ocular or systemic complaints. On systemic exami- nation, the boy had a short stature compared to his age, short fingers and limbs. On ophthalmic examination, Vn in RE was 20/200 and LE was finger counting 5 ft. Cornea and other ocular adnexa were normal. The lens was spherical in shape and dislocated in the anterior chamber. There were no signs of iridocyclitis. Intraocular tension in both eyes was 20.6 mm Hg. Posterior segment evaluation was normal. Introduction of lens displacement. ctopia lentis is defined as displacement Frequency Eor malposition of the crystalline lens of the eye. The lens is considered dislocated or United States luxated when it lies completely outside the Ectopia lentis is a rare condition. Incidence lens patellar fossa, in the anterior chamber, in the general population is unknown. The free-floating in the vitreous, or directly on most common cause of ectopia lentis is the retina. The lens is described as subluxed trauma, which accounts for nearly one half when it is partially displaced but contained of all cases of lens dislocation. within the lens space. In the absence of Mortality/Morbidity trauma, ectopia lentis should evoke suspicion for concomitant hereditary systemic disease Ectopia lentis may cause marked visual disturbance, which varies with the degree of or associated ocular disorders. lens displacement and the underlying Weil Marchesani syndrome is also known aetiologic abnormality. -
3Rd Annual Meeting July 21 - 23, 2017 Warangal, Telangana Organized by Warangal Ophthalmological Association OPHTHA L a M N O a L
OPHTHA L A M N O A L O G G N I A C L A E L T Telangana Ophthalmological Society 3rd Annual Meeting July 21 - 23, 2017 Warangal, Telangana Organized by Warangal Ophthalmological Association OPHTHA L A M N O A L O G G N I A C L A E Telangana Ophthalmological Society L T CONTACT INFORMATION Secretary, TSOS Chairperson, Scientific Committee Ravindra Aitharaju Pravin K Vaddavalli +91 9866426367 +91 9849094245 [email protected] L V Prasad Eye Institute Organizing Secretary Road No 2, Banjara Hills G R Bharath Kumar Hyderabad 500034 +91 9849191090 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Members, Scientific Committee Ashok Madiraju Samatha G +91 9032047350 +91 9985550479 [email protected] [email protected] Rishi Swarup Srinivas Prasad K +91 9885812617 +91 9848019856 [email protected] [email protected] 2 3rd Annual Meeting CONTENTS S. No. Page No 1 Contact information ............................................................................................................. 2 2 Message from the Scientific Committee .......................................................................... 4 3 Executive Committee ............................................................................................................. 5 4 Managing Committee ............................................................................................................. 7 5 Local Organizing Committee ................................................................................................ 8 6 Lifetime Achievement